Women With Synchronous Primary Cancers of the Endometrium and Ovary: Do They Have Lynch Syndrome?

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (36) ◽  
pp. 9344-9350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela T. Soliman ◽  
Russell R. Broaddus ◽  
Kathleen M. Schmeler ◽  
Molly S. Daniels ◽  
Delia Gonzalez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Germline Mutation ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Degree Relative ◽  
Cancer Predisposition Syndrome ◽  
Amsterdam Criteria ◽  
Medium Risk

Purpose Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer; HNPCC) is an autosomal-dominant cancer predisposition syndrome that increases risk for multiple cancers, including colon, endometrial, and ovarian cancer. Revised Bethesda Criteria recommend that patients with two HNPCC-associated cancers undergo molecular evaluation to determine whether they have a mismatch repair (MMR) defect associated with HNPCC. The purpose of our study was to determine the likelihood of MMR defects (MSH2, MSH6, MLH1) in women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer. Patients and Methods Between 1989 and 2004, 102 women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers were identified; 59 patients had tumor blocks available for analysis. Patients were divided into risk groups based on family history: high (met Amsterdam criteria), medium (personal history or first-degree relative with an HNPCC-associated cancer), and low (all others). Protein expression for MSH2, MSH6, and MLH1 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Microsatellite instability and MLH1 promoter methylation analyses were performed on a subset of cases. Results Median age was 50 years. Two patients met Amsterdam criteria for HNPCC. Five additional patients, all medium-risk, had molecular findings consistent with a germline mutation of either MSH2 or MLH1. None of the low-risk patients had molecular results consistent with a germline mutation. Conclusion Overall, 7% of women in our cohort met either clinical or molecular criteria for Lynch syndrome. All of these women had a prior history or a first-degree relative with an HNPCC-associated cancer. Limiting genetic evaluation to women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer who have a family history suggestive of HNPCC may appropriately identify women with Lynch syndrome.

scholarly journals PMS2 germline mutation c.943C>T (p.Arg315*)‐induced Lynch syndrome‐associated ovarian cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqing Guo ◽  
Weimin Wu ◽  
Hao Gao ◽  
Xiaofeng Li ◽  
Qizhi He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Germline Mutation

Lynch Syndrome: From Screening to Diagnosis to Treatment in the Era of Modern Molecular Oncology

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 293-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacey A. Cohen ◽  
Colin C. Pritchard ◽  
Gail P. Jarvik
Keyword(s):  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cancer Therapeutics ◽  
Cancer Predisposition Syndrome ◽  
Molecular Oncology ◽  
Repair Protein ◽  
Amsterdam Criteria ◽  
Common Etiology ◽  
Somatic Alterations

Lynch syndrome is a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome caused by germline alterations in the mismatch repair genes and is the most common etiology of hereditary colorectal cancer. While Lynch syndrome was initially defined by the clinical Amsterdam criteria, these criteria lack the sensitivity needed for clinical utility. This review covers the evolution of screening for Lynch syndrome from the use of tumor microsatellite instability and/or somatic alterations in mismatch repair protein expression by immunohistochemistry to the newest methods using next-generation sequencing. Additionally, it discusses the clinical implications of the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome as it affects cancer therapeutics and the role of screening in noncolorectal Lynch-associated cancers. As molecular oncology continues to evolve, it is crucial to remain current on the increasing complexity of Lynch syndrome diagnostics and treatment options.

Characterisation of heterozygous PMS2 variants in French patients with Lynch syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 487-499
Author(s):  
Qing Wang ◽  
Julie Leclerc ◽  
Gaëlle Bougeard ◽  
Sylviane Olschwang ◽  
Stéphanie Vasseur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family History ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Founder Effect ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Haplotype Analysis ◽  
Genomic Rearrangements ◽  
Colorectal Cancers ◽  
Amsterdam Criteria ◽  
Insight Into

BackgroundHeterozygous germline PMS2 variants are responsible for about 5% of Lynch syndrome (LS) but their prevalence is most likely underestimated because of complicated routine screening caused by highly homologous pseudogenes. Consequently, there is limited knowledge on the implication of the PMS2 gene in LS.MethodsWe report 200 PMS2 heterozygous variants identified in 195 French patients, including 112 unique variants classified as class-3/4/5.ResultsGenomic rearrangements account for 18% of alterations. The c.137G>T variant was observed in 18% of the patients, but a founder effect could not be clearly identified by haplotype analysis. Among class-4/5 variant carriers, the median age at first tumour onset was 49 years with a predominance of colorectal (80%) and endometrial (8.1%) cancers. Seven patients developed colorectal cancers before the age of 30 with the youngest at the age of 21. Only 6.2% of class-4/5 carriers had a family history fulfilling Amsterdam I/II criteria among patients with available data. Tumours from PMS2 variant carriers exhibited microsatellite instability (96%) and loss of PMS2 expression (76%), confirming the high predictive value of somatic analysis.ConclusionOur results provide further insight into the role of the PMS2 gene in LS. While PMS2 variants are mostly detected in families not fulfilling Amsterdam criteria, which supports their lower penetrance, they can nevertheless cause early-onset cancers, highlighting the variability of their penetrance.

Prospective Determination of Prevalence of Lynch Syndrome in Young Women With Endometrial Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (33) ◽  
pp. 5158-5164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen H. Lu ◽  
John O. Schorge ◽  
Kerry J. Rodabaugh ◽  
Molly S. Daniels ◽  
Charlotte C. Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Germline Mutation ◽  
Age Of Onset ◽  
Cancer Syndrome ◽  
Degree Relative ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Tumor Studies ◽  
The Mean

Purpose Age younger than 50 years at the time of colon cancer diagnosis is often used as a screening criterion for Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome). The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 mutations in an unselected cohort of women diagnosed with endometrial cancer at age younger than 50 years. Methods A prospective, multicenter study was performed at three institutions. After written consent was obtained, germline mutation testing by full sequencing and large deletion analysis of the MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes was performed. Tumor studies included immunohistochemistry of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6; microsatellite instability analysis; and hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter. Results Of the 100 women, nine (9%; 95% CI, 4.2 to 16.4) carried a deleterious germline mutation: seven women with mutations in MSH2, one woman with a mutation in MLH1, and one woman with a mutation in MSH6. Two additional women had molecular studies consistent with the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome. The mean body mass index (BMI) for the entire cohort was 34.4, which is significantly higher than 29.2, the mean BMI for the mutation carriers. Predictors of finding a germline mutation included having a first-degree relative with a Lynch syndrome–associated cancer, endometrial tumor with loss of MSH2 expression, tumors with high microsatellite instability, and lower BMI. Conclusion In this prospective study of endometrial cancer patients younger than age 50 years, 9% were found to carry germline Lynch syndrome–associated mutations. In addition to young age of onset, family history, BMI, and molecular tumor studies can improve the likelihood of identifying a Lynch syndrome–associated germline mutation in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6.

Characterization of family history profiles in a large series of Lynch syndrome carriers.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 414-414
Author(s):  
Devki Saraiya ◽  
Sara J. Wiyrick ◽  
Barry S. Tong ◽  
Kelsey Moyes ◽  
Elizabeth Garner
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Single Gene ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Degree Relative ◽  
Large Rearrangement ◽  
Full Sequence ◽  
Bethesda Criteria ◽  
Second Degree

414 Background: The identification of Lynch syndrome carriers is an unmet medical need. Large studies characterizing family history profiles of unaffected individuals diagnosed with Lynch syndrome in the absence of a known family mutation have not been reported. Methods: We queried our laboratory database for unaffected patients who underwent Lynch syndrome genetic testing between September 2010 and May 2013 and had a positive test result. All individuals underwent full sequence and large rearrangement analysis of MLH1 and MSH2, and full sequence analysis of MSH6. Some patients also underwent full sequence and large rearrangement analysis of PMS2 and large rearrangement analysis of MSH6 and EPCAM. Those being tested for a known mutation in the family and patients undergoing single gene testing were excluded. We assessed family history profiles in 200 unaffected patients with genetically confirmed Lynch syndrome. Results: Of the 200 patients, 162 female and 38 male Lynch syndrome carriers were identified. Mutations in MLH1 and MSH2 were the most common (30.0% and 32.5%) while mutations in MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM accounted for 21.0%, 13.5%, and 3.0% of all deleterious mutations, respectively. Eighteen patients did not have a first or second degree relative with colorectal cancer. Only 37.8% (73/193) of individuals had a first- or second-degree relative meeting the Amsterdam II criteria and 76.8 % (149/194) of individuals had a first or second degree relative meeting the Revised Bethesda criteria. The average PREMM1,2,6 score was 10.0% with 43.5% (87/200) falling below 5%. In this large cohort, 15.5% (31/200) had neither a first or second degree relative who met the Amsterdam II or Revised Bethesda criteria nor a PREMM1,2,6 score of 5% or greater. Conclusions: In order to improve detection of Lynch syndrome in the population, it is important to consider genetic testing in unaffected individuals even in the absence of a known family mutation. Development of guidelines that include having a single affected relative and extra-colonic cancers is needed to support healthcare providers in identifying appropriate patients for testing.

scholarly journals The genetic analysis of a founder Northern American population of European descent identifies FANCI as a candidate familial ovarian cancer risk gene

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin T Fierheller ◽  
Laure Guitton-Sert ◽  
Wejdan M Alenezi ◽  
Timothée Revil ◽  
Kathleen K Oros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Family History ◽  
Serous Carcinoma ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Risk ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Degree Relative ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Familial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
History Of

AbstractSome familial ovarian cancer (OC) could be due to rare risk alleles in genes that each account for a relatively small proportion of cases not due to BRCA1 and BRCA2, major risk genes in the homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair pathway. We report a new candidate OC risk allele, FANCI c.1813C>T in a Fanconi anemia (FA) gene that plays a role upstream of the HR DNA repair pathway. This variant was identified by whole exome sequencing of a BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-negative French Canadian (FC) OC family from a population exhibiting founder effects. In FCs, the c.1813C>T allele was detected in 7% (3/43) of familial and 1.6% (7/439) of sporadic OC cases; and in 3.7% (3/82) of familial breast cancer (BC) cases with a family history of OC and in 1.9% (3/158) of BC only families. This allele was significantly associated with FC BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-negative OC families (OR=5.6; 95%CI=1.6-19; p=0.006). Although FANCI c.1813C>T was detected in 2.5% (74/2950) of cancer-free FC females, carriers had a personal history of known OC risk reducing factors, and female/male carriers were more likely to have reported a first-degree relative with OC (ρ=0.037; p=0.011). Eight rare potentially pathogenic FANCI variants were identified in 3.3% (17/516) of Australian OC cases, including 10 carriers of FANCI c.1813C>T. Potentially pathogenic FANCI variants were significantly more common in AUS OC cases with a family history of OC than in isolated OC cases (p=0.027). The odds ratios (OR) were >3 for carriers of any of the seven rarest FANCI alleles, and 1.5 for c.1813C>T. Data from the OC Association Consortium revealed that the ORs for the c.1813C>T allele were highest for the most common OC subtypes. Localization of FANCD2, part of the FANCI-FANCD2 (ID2) binding complex in the FA pathway, to sites of induced DNA damage was severely impeded in cells expressing the p.L605F isoform. This isoform was expressed at a reduced level; unstable by formaldehyde or mitomycin C treatment; and exhibited sensitivity to cisplatin but not to olaparib (a poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase inhibitor). By tissue microarray analyses, FANCI protein was robustly expressed in fallopian tube epithelial cells but expressed at low-to-moderate levels in 88% (83/94) of high-grade serous carcinoma OC samples. This is the first study to describe potentially pathogenic variants in OC in a member of the ID2 complex of the FA DNA repair pathway. Our data suggest that potentially pathogenic FANCI variants may modify OC risk in cancer families.

Brief family history questionnaire to screen for Lynch syndrome in women with newly diagnosed non-serous, non-mucinous ovarian cancers

2022 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2021-003082
Author(s):  
Soyoun Rachel Kim ◽  
Alicia Tone ◽  
Raymond Kim ◽  
Matthew Cesari ◽  
Blaise Clarke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Extended Family ◽  
Screening Strategy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Family History Questionnaire ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

ObjectivesWhile ovarian cancer is the third most common Lynch syndrome-associated cancer in women, there is no established screening strategy to identify Lynch syndrome in this population. The objective of this study was to assess whether the 4-item brief Family History Questionnaire can be used as a screening tool to identify women with ovarian cancer at risk of Lynch syndrome.MethodsIn this prospective cohort study, participants with newly diagnosed non-serous, non-mucinous ovarian cancer completed the brief Family History Questionnaire, extended Family History Questionnaire, and had tumors assessed with immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins, MLH1 methylation, and microsatellite instability testing. All underwent universal germline testing for Lynch syndrome. Performance characteristics were compared between the brief Family History Questionnaire, extended Family History Questionnaire, immunohistochemistry±MLH1 methylation, and microsatellite instability testing.ResultsOf 215 participants, 169 (79%) were evaluable with both the brief Family History Questionnaire and germline mutation status; 12 of these 169 were confirmed to have Lynch syndrome (7%). 10 of 12 patients (83%) with Lynch syndrome were correctly identified by the brief Family History Questionnaire, compared with 6 of 11 (55%) by the extended Family History Questionnaire, 11 of 13 (85%) by immunohistochemistry±MLH1 methylation, and 9 of 11 (82%) by microsatellite instability testing. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values of the brief Family History Questionnaire were 83%, 65%, 15%, and 98%, respectively. A combined approach with immunohistochemistry and the brief Family History Questionnaire correctly identified all 12 patients with Lynch syndrome. The brief Family History Questionnaire was more sensitive than the extended Family History Questionnaire and took <10 min for each patient to complete.ConclusionsThe brief Family History Questionnaire alone or combined with immunohistochemistry may serve as an adequate screening strategy, especially in centers without access to universal tumor testing.

scholarly journals Lynch syndrome I: A case report

2008 ◽  
Vol 61 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 79-82
Author(s):  
Vesna Zivkovic ◽  
Vuka Katic ◽  
Jasmina Gligorijevic ◽  
Zlatibor Andjelkovic ◽  
Aleksandar Petrovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Degree Relative ◽  
Mmr Genes ◽  
Amsterdam Criteria

Introduction. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), also known as Lynch syndromes J and II, accounts for about 5-8% of colorectal cancers. Lynch syndrome I is an autosomal domi?nant inherited disorder characterized by early onset of colorectal cancer, predominance of proximal and multiple tumors, and microsatellite instability. In order to identify HNPCC, the international "Amsterdam criteria" have been used. Case report. The proband was a 40-year-old male who was admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of advanced rectal cancer. Left colectomy was carried out. A histopathologic diagnosis of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of clinical stage Dukes C was made. The family talking was done and it was revealed that the pro-band had five family members (one of first degree relative) with colorectal cancer, and two successive generations affected. All malignancy were diagnosed before 45 years of age. In one family member, metachronous transverse cancer was revealed 12 years after surgery for cecal adenocarcinoma. Discussion and conclusion. The main molecular cause for HNPCC is constitutional mutation in one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes that regulate the excision of errors occurring during DNA replication. The most often are mutations of MLHI and MSH2 genes, and microsatellite instability is present in about 90-95% HNPCC. In this report, we present a case of an HNPCC patient who met the Amsterdam criteria for Lynch syndrome I. Family members that fulfill the Amsterdam criteria should be investigated for mutation in MMR genes. The genetic tests are not routinely available, so colonoscopic screening of all asymptomatic family members older than 25 has been recommended.

scholarly journals Synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer in Lynch syndrome with a MSH2 germline mutation: A case report

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Takeda ◽  
Kouji Banno ◽  
Megumi Yanokura ◽  
Mayuka Anko ◽  
Arata Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Germline Mutation

Screening for Lynch syndrome in unselected women with endometrial cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5508-5508
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Ferguson ◽  
Melyssa Aronson ◽  
Lua R Eiriksson ◽  
Golnessa Mojtahedi ◽  
Aaron Pollett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Germline Mutation ◽  
Mutation Testing ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Family History Questionnaire

5508 Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is often the sentinel cancer in women with Lynch Syndrome (LS) however it is often not recognized in this population. A prospective cohort study comparing family history, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, and tumour morphology to germline mutation status in MMR genes was performed in unselected women with EC to determine which screening strategy was superior in identifying women with LS. Methods: All women with newly diagnosed EC between July 2010 and June 2011 were asked to participate in the prospective screening protocol for LS which included completing an extended family history questionnaire (eFHQ), tumor assessment for LS-associated morphologic features and IHC as well as germline mutation testing. Results: 119 (n = 182, 65%) consented to the study. The median age was 61 (26-91), 96 (81%) stage I, and 42 (35%) had high risk histology. There were 6 (7.4%, n = 81) women that were germline mutation positive (MLH1 N=3; MSH6 n = 2; MSH2 n =1), representing a mutation positive rate of at least 5% in this cohort (6/119). All 3 MLH1 mutation positive women had low grade histology while mutations in MSH2/6 were exclusively found in women with high risk histology. Two of the six mutation positive women were not identified by family history. Mutation positivity was higher in women under age 50 (23%; 5/22) compared to women > age 50 (1%; 1/97)( (p = 0.0008). LS-morphologic features were found in 58 (59%, n = 98) women. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the LS-associated features in predicting LS mutation status was 100%, 42.6%, 7.9% and 100% compared to IHC which was 100%, 76%, 18% and 100% and eFHQ which was 67%, 84%, 27%, 97%. Conclusions: In this unselected population of women with newly diagnosed EC the germline mutation rate for LS was 2-3 times that has previously been reported. Previously described LS-associated morphologic features were not specific to germline mutation status and family history missed one third of women with LS. IHC was the best strategy to identify women with EC who should undergo germline mutation testing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document