Quality of life, depression and anxiety in chronic lymphocytic leukemia during phases of “watchful waiting” and active treatment

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6603-6603
Author(s):  
T. Levin

6603 Background: Although chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) accounts for 25–30% of leukemia cases in the USA, little is known about its quality of life (QOL) and psychosocial burden. The purpose of this study was to compare QOL, anxiety and depression in watch and wait versus actively treated CLL. Methods: Using a cross-sectional design, 105 patients were recruited from a CLL research database. 57 were classified as watch and wait and 48 as receiving or having received chemotherapy for CLL. The patients completed a battery of QOL measures including the SF-36, FACT-Lym, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and the Patient Health Questionnaire. Results: No differences were found between the treatment groups on the main QOL outcome measures - Mental Component Score, Physical Component Score, FACT-G, FACT-lymphoma (15 item), BDI-II and BAI. There was a clear age effect: younger patients (<60 years old) have worse Mental Component (p=0.0001), FACT-G (p=0.060), depression (p=0.014), Role Emotional (p=0.042), Mental Health (p=0.001), FACT-Emotional (p=0.0001) and FACT-Social (p=0.002) scores. Younger watch and wait patients seem to be particularly vulnerable to anxiety (p=0.052). Social and emotional QOL are statistically similar in both newly diagnosed and patients diagnosed six or more years ago, although patients do carry a greater physical QOL burden with time (p=0.05). Conclusions: Overall QOL, depression and anxiety are remarkably similar in watch and wait versus actively treated CLL, despite the latter group having, by definition, later stage disease. Younger patients (<60 years old) seem particularly vulnerable to having a reduced emotional and social QOL and having more depression. Younger watch and wait patients stood out as suffering from more anxiety. Patients diagnosed for more than 6 years carry a greater physical QOL burden, but social and emotional QOL are similar to newly diagnosed patients. Implications of these findings are considered. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3491-3491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Danilov ◽  
Habte A Yimer ◽  
Michael Boxer ◽  
John M Burke ◽  
Sunil Babu ◽  
...  

Introduction: Longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). GIBB (NCT02320487) is an open-label, single-arm phase II study of obinutuzumab (GA101; G) in combination with bendamustine (G-Benda) in patients with previously untreated CLL. A previous report from the GIBB study demonstrated an investigator-assessed objective response rate of 89.2%, a complete response rate of 49.0%, and no unexpected safety signals with G-Benda (Sharman et al. J Clin Oncol 2017). Here we report the final HRQoL data over 3 years from the GIBB study. Methods: Enrolled patients received G-Benda by intravenous infusion over six 28-day cycles: G 100mg on Day (D)1, 900mg on D2, and 1000mg on D8 and D15 of Cycle (C)1, then 1000mg on D1 of C2-6; benda 90mg/m2 on D2-3 of C1, and on D1-2 of C2-6. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) includes a global health status measure, 5 functional scales (physical, emotional, cognitive, social, and role functioning), 8 symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea), and an item on financial difficulties (Aaronson et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993). The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 16 (QLQ-CLL16) is a 16-item module, specific to CLL, containing 4 multi-item scales (fatigue, treatment side effects, disease symptoms, and infection) and 2 single items (social activities and future health worries). Both questionnaires were completed by patients on C1D1 (baseline), C3D1, and C6D1, at the end of induction (EOI) treatment (defined as +28 days from C6D1 or early treatment termination visit), at the response visit (defined as 2-3 months after the EOI treatment for all patients who received study treatment and had not experienced disease progression), and every 3 months thereafter at follow-up visits for up to 2 years. In total, there were 14 timepoints where data were collected. HRQoL scores were linear transformed to a 0-100-point scale. Mean baseline scores and mean score changes from baseline at each visit were evaluated. A threshold of ≥10-point change in score represents a clinically meaningful difference. For symptoms, negative change scores from baseline reflect an improvement in symptom burden. For global health status and functioning, positive change scores from baseline reflect improvements. Results: The trial enrolled 102 patients. Median age was 61 years and 68.4% of patients were male. Ninety-eight patients (96%) completed a questionnaire at baseline and at least 1 other questionnaire during a follow-up visit. Questionnaire completion rates at 14 time points ranged from 96% at baseline to 66% at 27 months follow-up (Table 1). According to the EORTC QLQ-C30 (Figure 1), improvements were observed for global health status at all follow-up visits, and clinically meaningful improvements were observed at the response visit, 3 months follow-up, and 27 months follow-up. Clinically meaningful improvements in role functioning were observed at EOI and persisted throughout the 27-month follow-up. For fatigue, clinically meaningful improvements were observed at every visit starting from the end of treatment (EOT) visit. Improvements were also observed for insomnia with mean reductions from baseline ≥10 points at various time points during follow-up. There was no worsening in other patient-reported symptoms or functional status over time. Similarly, with the EORTC QLQ-CLL16 (Figure 2), clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms were observed for fatigue, disease symptoms, and future health worries during treatment, at the EOT and/or throughout the follow-up. The largest improvement was observed for fatigue (-24.7) at the 24-month follow-up and future health worries (-25.4) at the 27-month follow-up. Conclusions: We previously reported that G-Benda is an effective regimen for first-line treatment of CLL with no unexpected safety signals. The HRQoL data from the GIBB trial suggest that G-Benda treatment consistently improved patient HRQoL over time. Several clinically meaningful improvements were observed in HRQoL, including global health status, functioning, symptoms, and future health worries. Disclosures Danilov: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; MEI: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Travel Reimbursement , Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Aptose Biosciences: Research Funding; Aptose Biosciences: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Bayer Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Travel Reimbursement , Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Curis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; MEI: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Yimer:AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Clovis Oncology: Equity Ownership; Puma Biotechnology: Equity Ownership; Amgen: Consultancy. Boxer:Gerson Lerman: Consultancy; Best Doctors: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Burke:Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy. Babu:Genentech: Research Funding. Li:Genentech: Employment; Roche: Equity Ownership. Mun:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trask:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Masaquel:Roche: Equity Ownership; Genentech: Employment. Sharman:Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: GAZYVA (obinutuzumab) is a CD20-directed cytolytic antibody and is indicated: in combination with chlorambucil, for the treatment of patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia; in combination with bendamustine followed by GAZYVA monotherapy, for the treatment of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who relapsed after, or are refractory to, a rituximab-containing regimen


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. S218-S219
Author(s):  
Maria Jose Mela Osorio ◽  
Carolina Pavlovsky ◽  
Astrid Pavlovsky ◽  
Isolda Fernandez ◽  
Federico Sackmann Massa ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
pp. 755-762
Author(s):  
Padma Youron ◽  
Charanpreet Singh ◽  
Nishant Jindal ◽  
Pankaj Malhotra ◽  
Alka Khadwal ◽  
...  

Haematologica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (10) ◽  
pp. e519
Author(s):  
Paolo Ghia ◽  
Steven E. Coutre ◽  
Bruce D. Cheson ◽  
Jacqueline C. Barrientos ◽  
Peter Hillmen ◽  
...  

Hematology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 (1) ◽  
pp. 324-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tait D. Shanafelt ◽  
Neil E. Kay

The current management of B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is no longer straightforward for the practicing hematologist. Rapid advances in diagnostic precision, methods of predicting prognosis, understanding of natural history of CLL, recognition of clinical complications, clarification of the quality of life (QOL) issues facing the CLL patient, and the exciting array of novel treatment approaches have made the care of the CLL patient more demanding. This review is focused on summarizing these advances in order to provide a framework for integrating this knowledge into routine hematologic practice.


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-454
Author(s):  
Tomer T. Levin ◽  
John Riskind ◽  
Yuelin Li

AbstractObjective:Looming cognitive styles (LCS) bias the velocity of potential threats and have been implicated in anxiety and depression vulnerability. This study aims to explore their contribution to impaired quality of life (QOL), beyond that of depression and anxiety, in a cancer cohort.Method:In a cross-sectional design, an ambulatory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cohort completed a psychological battery that included the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories, the SF-36 Health Survey, the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACT), the Looming Cognitive Style Questionnaire (LCSQ), and the Looming Cancer measure.Results:The Looming Cancer measure correlated significtly with overall QOL (FACT-G, p = 0.005). This effect was largely due to the contribution of emotional QOL (Mental Component Score: SF-36, p = 0.001; FACT-emotional, p = 0.001) and functional QOL (FACT-functional, p = 0.001). Looming, unlike anxiety and depression, did not correlate with a worse physical QOL (Physical Component Score: SF-36, FACT-physical). Looming did not impact on social QOL. Hierarchical regression analysis showed that looming predicted 5.4% of the varience on the FACT-emotional, 5.1% on the Mental Component Score (SF-36), and 9.3% on the mental health subscale (SF-36), above and beyond the varience predicted by a constellation of psychosocial factors (including age, marital status, education, income) and the combined effect of depression and anxietySignificance of results:LCS predicts worse emotional and functional QOL, above and beyond the contribution of anxiety, depression, and other psycho-social variables. This suggests that it makes a unique contribution to a worse QOL. Nevertheless, the looming construct still remains primarily a research tool in psycho-oncology at this time.


Hematology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Ferrajoli

Abstract Younger patients (defined as patients younger than 50–55 years of age) represent a small group of newly diagnosed patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, accounting only for 10% to 20% of newly diagnosed cases. However, once these patients become symptomatic and require treatment, their life expectancy is significantly reduced. Therapeutic approaches for younger patients should be directed at improving survival by achieving a complete remission and, where possible, eradicating minimal residual disease. Chemoimmunotherapy combinations carry the highest response rates and are commonly offered to younger patients. Additional strategies that should be considered for younger patients include early referral for stem-cell transplantation and clinical trials of consolidation therapy to eliminate minimal residual disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document