Prediction of outcome using positron emission tomography (PET) compared to standard response criteria and potential role in treatment decisions in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7565-7565
Author(s):  
M. Trneny ◽  
U. Jaeger ◽  
O. Belohlavek ◽  
C. Skrabs ◽  
J. Koren ◽  
...  

7565 Background: PET has been demonstrated to give valid information about viable tumor residua. There are however only limited data regarding the combination of classical response criteria with PET and there is a lack of information on the impact of additional therapy (add-Th) on the outcome of PET neg. or PET pos. pts. Methods: One hundred thirty-nine pts (median age 50y) with newly diagnosed DLBCL who were examined by PET during (after 2–4 cycles CHT - ‘early PET’) or/and at the end of therapy (‘end PET’) were analyzed retrospectively. IPI risk distribution were as follows: L 28%, LI 24%, IH 33% and H 15% pts. All pts were treated with anthracyclin based CHT. “Early PET” was performed in 84 pts. and “end PET” in 103 pts before add-Th, PET at both time points was performed in 48 pts. Add-Th (HDT with ASCT or/and radiotherapy), was given as planned or as a result of response evaluation (conventional methods - CT, trephine biopsy). No treatment modification was made on PET result only, except for 2 cases when planned RT was skipped because of PET neg. RT was performed in 59 pts (42.4%) and HDT with ASCT as consolidation in 54 pts (38.8%). Median follow up was 30 m. Results: CR or CRu was achieved after CHT in 102 (74%) pts, PR in 24 (17%) pts, stable or progress dis. in 13 (9%). ‘Early PET’ was neg. in 60% pts and ‘end PET’ was neg in 67% pts. PET neg. was achieved at least once in 97 (70%) pts, and PET pos. at least once was found in 50 pts (36%). The PFS at 30 m according to the combination of conventional and PET response was as follows: for CR PET-neg. pts 89%, for PR PET-neg. pts 90%, for CR PET-pos. pts 45% and for PR PET-pos. pts 64% (p=0.0001). OS was 93%, 63%, 90% and 83%, respect.(p=0.004). The analysis of impact of add-Th showed PFS at 30 m: for PET-neg pts with Add-Th 96%, for PET-neg. pts without Add-Th 82%. PET-pos. pts without Add-Th had a PFS of only 10% and PET-pos. pts with add-Th had PFS 58% (p=0.0001). The OS was 92%, 98%, 38% and 74% respect. (p=0.0001). Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that PET give more powerful information than standard response criteria. The second analysis support the the idea that pts with DLBCL in CR who remain PET pos. should undergo the additional therapy. Partial support: Grant MSM 0021620808 No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 442-449
Author(s):  
Rebecca R. Schoen ◽  
Michael W. Nagy ◽  
Andrea L. Porter ◽  
Amanda R. Margolis

Background: For highly stable warfarin patients, limited data exists regarding patient satisfaction on extended international normalized ratio (INR) follow-up intervals and how this population compares with patients on a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). Objective: To assess the impact on patient satisfaction of extending INR follow-up intervals. Methods: Veterans on stable warfarin doses had extended INR follow-up intervals up to 12 weeks in a single-arm prospective cohort study for 2 years. This analysis included participants who completed at least 2 Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scales (DASS). The primary outcome was the change in the DASS. A focus group described participant experiences. Participant satisfaction was compared to patients on a DOAC. Results: Of the 51 participants, 48 were included in the warfarin extended INR follow-up group. Compared with baseline, the mean DASS score (42.9 ± 12.08) was worse at 24 months (46.82 ± 15.2, P = 0.0266), with a small effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.29). The 8 participants in the focus group were satisfied with the extended INR follow-up interval but would be uncomfortable extending follow-up past 2 to 3 months. The extended INR follow-up interval study had similar DASS scores as the 33 participants included on DOAC therapy (46.8 ± 15.1, P = 0.9970) but may be limited by differing populations using DOACs. Conclusion and Relevance: For patients currently stable on warfarin therapy, extending the INR follow-up interval up to 12 weeks or changing to a DOAC does not appear to improve patient satisfaction.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4456-4456
Author(s):  
Yoshiki Terada ◽  
Hirohisa Nakamae ◽  
Takahiko Nakane ◽  
Hideo Koh ◽  
Yasunobu Takeoka ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: The achievement of a clinical response to the first induction chemotherapy has been considered for predicting survival in patients (pts) with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Reduced dose intensity of chemotherapy has been likely to compromise long-term outcome of the patients with aggressive NHL treated with a standard chemotherapy of cyclophosphamide (CY), doxorubicin (ADR), vincristine and prednisone (CHOP). In particular, recent studies have revealed the relevance of relative dose intensity (RDI) to clinical outcomes, with reduced RDI leading to a poor survival, as well as the impact of RDI<85% for aggressive NHL with detailed analysis of risk factors influencing reduce RDI<85% (Gary H. Lyman, J. Clin Oncol22: 4302, 2004). This study was conducted to investigate the impact of RDI<85% of CHOP on outcomes of the pts with diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma (DLCL). Methods: Data were retrospectively collected on 100 pts with DLCL who had been initially treated with more than 3 courses of CHOP (n=70) or CHOP plus rituximab (CHOP-R, n=30) at our institution between 1995 and 2006. We evaluated whether RDI might affect clinical outcomes, including complete response (CR) and event free survival (EFS). The average RDI derived from CY and ADR (referred to as RDI-CY/ADR) was determined for each patient, with classified into 2 populations according to the differences from the value of 85%, including RDI-CY/ADR<85% (n=60), and RDI-CY/ADR≥85% (n=40). Results: The median age of the study population was 54 years (range, 17 to 76), with 36 pts older than 60 years (yrs) of age. According to International Prognostic Index (IPI) score, pts were classified into 2 groups of low/ low-intermediate (n=46) and high/ high-intermediate (n=54). The overall CR rate reached 62%, and the probability of overall survival (OS) or EFS at 5 years estimated 77% or 43%, respectively with a median follow-up of 13.3 months. Multivariate analysis identified RDI-CY/ADR<85%, as well as IPI score to be associated with CR rate and EFS. Thus, RDI-CY/ADR<85% and IPI score of high/ high-intermediate were significant factors for lower CR rate (as RDI-CY/ADR≥85%, HR=0.3, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.7, p=0.009, and HR=5.5, 95% CI 2.2 to 14, p<0.001, respectively), and for reduced EFS (HR=1.9, 95% CI 1.0 to 3.7, p=0.048, and as IPI score of low/ low-intermediate HR=0.3, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.6, p<0.001, respectively). Furthermore, logrank analysis revealed that CY/ADR-RDI<85% was the significant factor for reduced EFS in non elderly pts (≤60 yrs of age), or in pts with IPI score of low/ low-intermediate (p=0.01, p=0.02, respectively). Conclusion: These data thus suggested the impact of RDI-CY/ADR<85% in influencing outcomes of the pts with DLCL, in terms of CR rate and EFS. Further investigation is currently planned to confirm this promising results with longer follow-up in larger numbers of pts with NHL.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (34) ◽  
pp. 5435-5441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Völker ◽  
Timm Denecke ◽  
Ingo Steffen ◽  
Daniel Misch ◽  
Stefan Schönberger ◽  
...  

Purpose The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18–fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for initial staging and therapy planning in pediatric sarcoma patients. Patients and Methods In this prospective multicenter study, 46 pediatric patients (females, n = 22; males, n = 24; age range, 1 to 18 years) with histologically proven sarcoma (Ewing sarcoma family tumors, n = 23; osteosarcoma, n = 11; rhabdomyosarcoma, n = 12) were examined with conventional imaging modalities (CIMs), including ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scintigraphy according to the standardized algorithms of the international therapy optimization trials, and whole-body FDG-PET. A lesion- and patient-based analysis of PET alone and CIMs alone and a side-by-side (SBS) analysis of FDG-PET and CIMs were performed. The standard of reference consisted of all imaging material, follow-up data (mean follow-up time, 24 ± 12 months), and histopathology and was determined by an interdisciplinary tumor board. Results FDG-PET and CIMs were equally effective in the detection of primary tumors (accuracy, 100%). PET was superior to CIMs concerning the correct detection of lymph node involvement (sensitivity, 95% v 25%, respectively) and bone manifestations (sensitivity, 90% v 57%, respectively), whereas CT was more reliable than FDG-PET in depicting lung metastases (sensitivity, 100% v 25%, respectively). The patient-based analysis revealed the best results for SBS, with 91% correct therapy decisions. This was significantly superior to CIMs (59%; P < .001). Conclusion In staging pediatric sarcoma, subsidiary FDG-PET scanning depicts important additional information and has a relevant impact on therapy planning when analyzed side-by-side with CIMs.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1195-1195
Author(s):  
Irit Avivi ◽  
Ariane Boumendil ◽  
Hervé Hervé Finel ◽  
Arnon Nagler ◽  
Aïda Sousa Bothello ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: The addition of rituximab to induction therapy had improved the outcome of patients with primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBCL). For those patients who are primary refractory or relapse after having achieved a remission, high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered as standard treatment. Only scanty information, however, is available regarding the role of ASCT in patients with relapsed / refractory PMBCL in the rituximab era. Moreover, the impact of pre- and post-transplant irradiation remains uncertain. The objective of the current study was to investigate the results of ASCT for PMBCL in the rituximab era, identify variables predictive for outcome, and assess the role of adjuvant radiotherapy. Patients and methods: For this retrospective study, all EBMT registered patients with PMBCL aged between 18 and 70 years who were treated with a first ASCT between 2000 and 2012 were eligible. Baseline patient, disease, and transplant data were collected from MED-A forms. Centers with potentially eligible patients were contacted to provide additional treatment and follow-up information including a written histopathology report. Statistical analysis used log rank test to assess the impact of baseline characteristics on survival endpoints. In multivariate analysis, the relevance of prognostic factors was estimated using Cox regression models. Curves of cumulative incidence of relapse (IR) were compared by Gray's test. Multivariate analysis of IR used Fine and Gray models. Results: 86 patients with confirmed PMBCL were eligible and had the full data set required for this analysis. 51% were female, median age was 34 years (range 20-69). Median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 12 months (12-299). 63.5% of the patients presented with a bulky mediastinal mass, larger than 10cm at diagnosis, 30.5% had stage IV disease, and 44% had B symptoms. 92% had received at least 2 lines of therapies, 85% had rituximab and 30% had received radiotherapy prior to transplantation. At ASCT, 11% still had a mass greater than 10 cm, and 19% a mass of 5-10cm. Remission status at ASCT was CR/PR1 in 21% of the patients, CR/PR>1 in 51%, and refractory disease in 28%. 31 patients (41%) received irradiation post-transplant. Thirteen patients of 24 patients (54%) transplanted in PR attained CR at day +100 post ASCT. With a median follow-up of 39 months (24-73), 3-year non-relapse mortality, IR, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for the whole series were 9%, 33%, 58% and 71%, respectively. By univariate analysis, refractory disease at ASCT and residual mass > 5cm at ASCT were significant adverse predictors for IR, EFS, and OS. 3-year EFS was 35% in refractory subjects vs 66% in chemosensitive patients (p=0.001), and 100% in those autografted in CR/PR1 vs 60% in those transplanted in more advanced response p=0.018. Notably, patients transplanted with refractory disease with a history of irradiation prior to ASCT had a superior outcome compared with non-irradiated refractory patients.Multivariate analysis suggested post-transplant irradiation to be associated with a significantly reduced IR (HR=0.24; p=0.028) and improved EFS (HR=0.24; p=0.018) and OS (HR=0.21; p=0.032). Discussion: In conclusion, this analysis gives first specific evidence that ASCT can provide durable remissions in patients with relapsed / refractory PMBCL in the rituximab era. Pre or post-transplant irradiation appears to be important, though deserves further studies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3950-3950
Author(s):  
Roopesh R. Kansara ◽  
Joseph M. Connors ◽  
Kerry J. Savage ◽  
David W Scott ◽  
Randy D. Gascoyne ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who achieve a complete (CR) or partial (PR) response to rituximab-containing chemotherapy followed by maintenance rituximab (MR) experience improved progression-free survival (PFS). In contrast, MR does not improve outcomes in chemo-sensitive patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). There are no published data describing the impact of MR in patients presenting with indolent and aggressive histology lymphoma simultaneously in the same biopsy (composite, COM) or two separate sites (discordant, DIS). Methods: Patients with newly-diagnosed COM/DIS lymphomas composed of an indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (excluding CLL/SLL, mantle cell lymphoma, and grade 3B FL) and DLBCL were identified in the British Columbia Cancer Agency Lymphoid Cancer Database. All patients received first-line chemotherapy with R-CHOP. In early 2006, a treatment policy was introduced recommending MR 375 mg/m2 IV every 3 months for 2 years in patients with COM/DIS lymphomas achieving a CR/PR to R-CHOP induction. PFS, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the time of diagnosis and compared between treatment groups. Results: 98 patients with COM/DIS lymphomas were identified between January 2001 and December 2013: median age 64 y (range 22 - 86), 56% male, 48% elevated LDH, 30% performance status ≥ 2, 87% stage III/IV, and 51% high-intermediate or high IPI. 58 (59%) and 40 (41%) patients had COM and DIS lymphoma, respectively. FL was the indolent component in 65% of all cases. 35/40 patients with DIS had low-grade histology in the bone marrow. Following R-CHOP, 77 (79%) and 21 (21%) patients achieved CR and PR, respectively. 43 patients were treated with R-CHOP alone before the MR policy introduction, and 55 were treated with R-CHOP+MR; the latter group received a median of 8 (range 1 - 8) MR doses. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or response rates between the two groups with the exception of a higher proportion of patients with poor performance status in the group not given MR. With a median follow-up of 10y (range 1.5 - 13.6) in living patients treated with R-CHOP and 6y (range 0.9-9.5) in patients treated with R-CHOP+MR, there were 20 (47%) and 15 (27%) relapses, respectively (p=0.26). Of these, 11 relapsed with indolent histology, 11 relapsed with DLBCL, 3 relapsed in the central nervous system (CNS), and 10 had no biopsy at relapse (8 had aggressive and 2 indolent clinical behavior on review of medical records). There were 6 (30%) indolent and 14 (70%) aggressive relapses in patients treated with R-CHOP, while there were 7 (47%) indolent and 8 (53%) aggressive relapses in patients treated with R-CHOP+MR (p=0.31). 19 patients eventually died from lymphoma (8 with DLBCL relapse, 5 without a biopsy at relapse, and all 3 with CNS recurrence). The 6-y PFS was 60% (standard error [SE] 5%) with no difference between patients treated with or without MR (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.74, 95% CI 0.39 - 1.37, p= 0.33). The 6-year TTP was 64% (SE 5%), again with no differences between the two groups (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.34 - 1.33, p= 0.25). The 6-year OS was similar between the two groups (p= 0.89). In the subgroup of patients with FL (21 R-CHOP and 43 R-CHOP+MR) the addition of MR did not impact PFS (p= 0.90), TTP (p= 0.99), or OS (p=0.55). An additional 52 patients were diagnosed after the treatment policy introduction in 2006, but did not receive MR for several reasons including physician non-adherence, progressive disease on R-CHOP, toxicity from R-CHOP or patient refusal. In an intent-to-treat analysis (43 pre-policy and 107 post-policy) there were no differences in outcomes. In a per-protocol analysis (95 R-CHOP and 55 R-CHOP+MR), there were no significant differences in outcomes. Conclusion: The addition of MR does not appear to improve PFS, TTP or OS in patients with COM/DIS lymphomas achieving CR/PR to R-CHOP, although comparisons are likely underpowered and 6-year median length of follow-up in the MR group may not be sufficient. However, the majority (63%) of relapses are aggressive and unlikely to be impacted by MR. The role of MR in these uncommon lymphomas requires further exploration. Disclosures Connors: Roche: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Savage:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria; Infinity: Honoraria; Roche: Other: Institutional research funding. Scott:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; NanoString: Patents & Royalties: Inventor on a patent that NanoString has licensed. Gerrie:Roche: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory board. Villa:Roche: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2-3
Author(s):  
Dai Chihara ◽  
Melissa C. Larson ◽  
Dennis P. Robinson ◽  
Carrie A. Thompson ◽  
Matthew J. Maurer ◽  
...  

Background: Obesity is increasing worldwide, with the highest prevalence in the United States. High or low body mass index (BMI) is a well-established risk factor for increased all-cause mortality and also has been associated with cancer-specific mortality. However, the impact of BMI on survival following diagnosis with lymphoma currently remains controversial. We leveraged a prospective cohort of lymphoma patients to assess the relationship of BMI two years prior to diagnosis (BMI-2), at diagnosis (BMI-dx), and three-years post-diagnosis (BMI+3) with lymphoma-specific survival (LSS) as the primary endpoint and with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) as secondary endpoints. Patient and Method: Patients were prospectively enrolled at lymphoma diagnosis to the SPORE Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) cohort at Mayo Clinic and University of Iowa from 2002-2015. BMI-2 and BMI+3 were self-reported in patient questionnaires, while BMI-dx was extracted from the medical chart. Patients with extreme BMI (BMI &lt;14 and BMI ≥50) were excluded from the analysis. BMI change from BMI-2 to BMI-dx and from BMI-dx to BMI+3 was categorized as no change (-5% to 5%), decrease (&gt;-5%), and increase (&gt;+5%). Person-time at risk was assessed from lymphoma diagnosis until death or last follow-up, except for analyses of BMI change from BMI-dx to BMI+3, which started person-time at risk when the 3-year (+/- 6 months) follow-up questionnaire was returned. Cause of death was assigned by a study clinician. For all lymphoma patients combined and in the most common subtypes, we evaluated the association of BMI at each time point and change in BMI with EFS, LSS, and OS using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from multivariable adjusted Cox models. Results: A total of 4,009 lymphoma patients (including 670 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], 689 follicular lymphoma [FL] and 1018 chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma [CLL/SLL] and 1,632 others) with data on BMI-dx were included. Among them, 2,955 patients had BMI-2 and 2,004 had BMI+3 and were evaluable for change in BMI. The median age of all patients at diagnosis was 61 years (range 18-92 years), and 94% of patients had ECOG performance status &lt;2. At the time of diagnosis, 28% were normal weight (BMI 18.5-25), 1% were underweight (BMI &lt;18.5), 39% were overweight (BMI 25-30) and 32% were obese (BMI ≥30). With a median follow-up of 108 months from diagnosis (IQR 83-143 months), 1320 deaths were observed, 48% of which were due to lymphoma. Patients with FL who were obese at BMI-2 had significantly shorter LSS (HR: 3.02, 95%CI: 1.43-6.41, p=0.004). Associations between obesity at BMI-2 and LSS were not evident for DLBCL (HR: 1.04, 95%CI: 0.62-1.76, p=0.879) or CLL/SLL (HR: 1.10, 95%CI: 0.71-1.70, p=0.668) (Table). BMI-dx was not associated with LSS in any lymphoma patients, except that DLBCL patients who were underweight at BMI-dx (n=10) experienced shorter LSS (HR: 3.52, 95%CI: 1.22-10.1, p=0.020). This correlated significantly with presence of B symptoms (p=0.004) and may signify aggressive disease. Across all subtypes, &gt;5% decrease in BMI from BMI-2 to BMI-dx was associated with significantly shorter LSS in patients with (HR: 2.02, 95%CI: 1.65-2.48, p&lt;0.001). However, only for FL patients, &gt;5% increase in BMI from BMI-dx to BMI+3 also was associated with significantly shorter LSS in subsequent years (HR: 3.74, 95%CI: 1.30-10.8, p=0.014). The associations reported for LSS generally were similar for EFS and OS. Conclusions: FL patients with obesity prior to diagnosis or who experienced increasing BMI after the diagnosis had significantly shorter LSS. The impact of weight control after the diagnosis of FL patient outcomes warrants investigation. Figure Disclosures Maurer: Celgene / BMS: Research Funding; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanostring: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Flowers:Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Denovo Biopharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; Kite: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: Research Funding; Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas: Research Funding; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; V Foundation: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; OptumRx: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cerhan:NanoString: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (18) ◽  
pp. 3647-3655
Author(s):  
Phoebe T. M. Cheng ◽  
Diego Villa ◽  
R. Petter Tonseth ◽  
David W. Scott ◽  
Alina S. Gerrie ◽  
...  

Abstract Radiotherapy (RT) is typically incorporated into the treatment of limited-stage nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL), although it remains unknown whether chemotherapy alone may be suitable in select patients. We evaluated outcomes of limited-stage NLPHL at BC Cancer on the basis of era-specific guidelines: routine RT era, 1995 to 2005 (n = 36), combined modality with 2 cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy followed by RT or RT alone; positron emission tomography (PET) era, after 2005 (n = 63), ABVD alone (4 cycles) if the PET scan after the second cycle of ABVD (PET2) is negative, or treatment is changed to RT if PET2 is positive. Median age of patients was 38 years (range, 16-82 years), 73% were male, and 43% had stage II. With a median follow-up of 10.5 years for all patients, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 93% and was 97% for overall survival (OS), with no difference by treatment era (PFS, P = .13; OS, P = .35). For the 49 patients who had a PET2 scan, 86% were PET negative and 14% were PET positive by Deauville criteria with 5-year PFS rates of 92% and 80% (P = .70), respectively. This is the largest study of a PET-adapted approach in NLPHL and supports that ABVD alone may be a viable option in select patients with a negative PET2 scan, with consideration of acute and long-term toxicities.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4708-4708
Author(s):  
Mustafa Cetiner ◽  
Taflan Salepci ◽  
Elif Birtas Atesoglu ◽  
Mahmut Gumus ◽  
Aslihan Guven ◽  
...  

Abstract Recently, the cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) regimen plus rituximab (R-CHOP) have been used widely to treat patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and it has also been reported to improve the outcome of DLBCL. We represent a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed DLBCL patients between the years of 2003–2005 to evaluate the impact of R-CHOP therapy on response rates. Patients with DLBCL between 20–80 years of age (median: 46.0 and mean 56.2 ± 14.92) received 6 cycles of R-CHOP (n=28). For comparison, DLBCL patients between 15–76 years of age (median: 60.5 and mean 47.3 ± 16.6) who received 6 courses of CHOP therapy (n=30) were used as the control group. All patients received classical CHOP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m m2 on day 1 and prednisone 40 mg/m m2 for 5 days) every 4 weeks. In R-CHOP group, rituximab 375 mg/m m2 was administered one day before CHOP chemotherapy. The median follow-up for R-CHOP and CHOP groups were 15.66 ± 5.90 (7–29) and 21.79 ± 9.20 (8–46) months, respectively. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores were not significantly different between these groups (median IPI of R-CHOP: 2.0 and mean IPI 2.01.27 ± 1.16 versus median IPI of CHOP: 1.0 and mean IPI 1.88 ± 1.26). Complete response (CR) and complete undetermined response (CuR) rate for R-CHOP was 92% (26 of 28 patients) which was statistically significantly higher than CHOP (24 of 30 patients, 80%) (p=0.004). Partial response (PR) rates for R-CHOP and CHOP groups were 7% (2 of 28 patients) and 10% (3 of 30 patients), respectively. While there were no unresponsive patients in the R-CHOP group, refractory disease rate was 10% (3 of 30 patients) in the CHOP group. Relapse rates during the follow up period were 13% (4 of 30 patients) for CHOP and 4% (1 of 28 patients) for R-CHOP group (p&lt;.0001). No long-term toxicity appeared to be associated with the addition of rituximab to the CHOP combination. These results also confirmed the benefit of the addition of rituximab to standard CHOP chemotherapy in DLBCL even in young patients with low IPI scores.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1380-1380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Ciminello ◽  
Christiana E. Toomey ◽  
Jeremy S. Abramson ◽  
Aliyah R. Sohani ◽  
Ephraim P. Hochberg

Abstract Abstract 1380 Poster Board I-402 Background: The impact of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) on cardiovascular mortality is well established. The pleotropic effects of statins extend beyond inhibition of cholesterol synthesis and the mevalonate pathway, including secondary prevention of prenylation and ubiquitination. Independent of the effect on HMG-CoA reductase, increasing evidence suggests that their lactone moiety may independently block the chymotrypsin activity of the proteasome. Proteosome inhibition results in the accumulation of p21 and p27 with subsequent inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases and G1 arrest. We investigated the impact of incidental statin use on patients with systemic Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). Concurrently, we investigated the effect of statins on p27 expression in DLBCL. Methods: We used an IRB-approved clinicopathologic database, derived from comprehensive tumor registry data at the Massachusetts General Hospital to identify all patients 18 years or older diagnosed with DLBCL between 2000 and 2006 (n=411). Patients were considered eligible for the study if they had a pathology-confirmed diagnosis of systemic DLBCL without evidence of a prior low grade lymphoma, received therapy with curative intent and had routine follow-up care within the system. 178 patients who did not meet these criteria were excluded. Final analysis included 233 patients who were evaluated for statin use via automated review of electronic medial records and billing databases (n=93 with statin use). Immunohistochemical staining for p27 was performed on six existing tissue samples. p27 IHC staining was performed manually using clone 57 (BD Biosciences) at a 1:100 dilution. Two control patient samples could not be assessed for p27 due to high background signal. Samples of two statin patients were compared to two control patients. Results: A total of 233 patients met eligibility and are included in the analysis. Median age was 60 years (range 19-92 years). 50% of patients were above 60 years of age, and 5% had an IPI score of 4 or higher. 74% of patients received CHOP + rituximab (RCHOP). 23% received CHOP alone. 3% recieved R-EPOCH and one received ProMACE-CytaBOM. At a median follow-up of 51 months (range 0-166 months), PFS and OS for the entire cohort are 72% and 77%, respectively. On univariate analysis of outcome, the incidental use of statins did not improve PFS (66.7% vs. 69.3%,p=0.955, Logrank Test) or OS (72.4% vs. 73.6%, p=0.456, Logrank Test). In relapsed patients (n=30) statins prolonged disease free survival (DFS) (p=0.0515). Median DFS was 833 days for statin patients and 384 days for controls. Mean age of the relapsed patients on statins was 65 vs. 54 for controls. Tumor cells showed weak p27 staining in comparison to strong staining in background small lymphocytes in patients treated with statins, while patients not treated with statins showed no staining of tumor cells. Conclusions: Incidental use of statins did not impact PFS or OS in DLBCL. Statins may slow disease progression in patients with relapsed DLBCL. One potential mechanism is upregulation of p27 and G1 cell cycle arrest. Disclosures: Hochberg: Enzon: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Biogen-Idec: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document