Infusion-related reactions (IRR) associated with cetuximab plus irinotecan treatment in patients with irinotecan-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Findings from the MABEL study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4137-4137 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Siena ◽  
R. Glynne-Jones ◽  
J. Thaler ◽  
A. Adenis ◽  
P. Preusser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Primary Efficacy Variable ◽  
Primary Efficacy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Secondary Objective ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Events Study

4137 Background: Cetuximab is an IgG1 anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, active alone and in combination with irinotecan in mCRC patients (pts) who have failed prior irinotecan therapy. In previous studies with cetuximab, IRRs were observed in a small proportion of pts especially at the first infusion. Methods: MABEL investigated cetuximab plus irinotecan in pts with EGFR-detectable mCRC whose last treatment regimen contained irinotecan. A secondary objective of MABEL was to further study cetuximab-related adverse events. Study treatment was cetuximab, initial dose 400 mg/m2, weekly 250 mg/m2, plus irinotecan with dose and schedule as pre-study. Data analyzed included prophylactic pre-medication, IRRs and medication for IRRs. Prophylactic medication given before the first cetuximab infusion was categorized as chlorphenamine antihistamines, antihistamines other than chlorphenamine, and any antihistamines plus corticosteroids. Results: Overall, 1147 pts were treated in this study: median age was 62 years [25–84], Karnofsky performance status was =70% and 64% pts were male. 1,122 patients were pre-treated with antihistamines. The frequency of IRRs was lower in pts who received antihistamines plus corticosteroids than in pts who received antihistamines alone (9.6% vs 25.6% any grade, 1% vs 4.7% grade 3/4 IRRs). The primary efficacy variable of MABEL was the 12-weeks progression-free survival (PFS) status. Efficacy results by pre-medication groups for PFS (see table ) and overall survival do not suggest differences related to prophylactic pre-medication. Conclusions: The data suggest that the type of pre-medication impacts on the occurrence of IRRs, and that the addition of corticosteroids to antihistamines reduces IRRs without altering antitumor efficacy in the analyzed pre-medication groups. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Patients Treated with NAb-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: The NAPA Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 887-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Catalano ◽  
Giandomenico Roviello ◽  
Raffaele Conca ◽  
Alberto D’Angelo ◽  
Valeria Emma Palmieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Prognostic And Predictive Markers

Background: The phase III MPACT trial demonstrated the superiority of gemcitabine (Gem) combined with Nab-paclitaxel (Nab-P) versus gemcitabine alone in previously untreated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of Gem/Nab-P in routine clinical practice. Methods: From January 2015 to December 2018, patients with metastatic PDAC receiving firstline treatment with a combination of gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel were included in a multicentre retrospective observational study. Exploratory analyses of efficacy, and prognostic and predictive markers, were performed. Results: The cohort comprised 115 patients (median age 65 [range 50-84] years) with good performance status (ECOG PS 0-1). The median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (95% CI; 9-13) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6 months (95% CI 5-7). Partial response and stable disease were achieved in 44 and 30 patients, respectively, yielding an overall disease control rate (DCR) of 64.3%. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity frequency was 22.61% for neutropenia, 5.22% for anemia, and 3.48% for thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 asthenia was recorded in 2.61% of patients. No grade 4 non-hematological events were reported. Dose reduction was necessary in 51.3% of the patients. Conclusions: Our results confirm the efficacy and safety of a first-line regimen comprising gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel in metastatic PDAC in a real-life population.

scholarly journals Survival benefits of hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with temozolomide or temozolomide plus bevacizumab in elderly patients with glioblastoma aged ≥ 75 years

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Ohno ◽  
Yasuji Miyakita ◽  
Masamichi Takahashi ◽  
Hiroshi Igaki ◽  
Yuko Matsushita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Promoter Hypermethylation ◽  
Hypofractionated Radiotherapy ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background and purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), who were treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy comprising 45 Gy in 15 fractions combined with temozolomide (TMZ) or TMZ and bevacizumab (TMZ/Bev). Materials and methods Between October 2007 and August 2018, 30 patients with GBM aged ≥75 years were treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy consisting of 45 Gy in 15 fractions. Twenty patients received TMZ and 10 received TMZ/Bev as upfront chemotherapy. O-6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status was analyzed by pyrosequencing. The cutoff value of the mean level of methylation at the 16 CpG sites was 16%. Results Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 12.9 months and 9.9 months, respectively. The 1-year OS and PFS rates were 64.7 and 34.7%, respectively. Median OS and PFS did not differ significantly between patients with MGMT promoter hypermethylation (N = 11) and those with hypomethylation (N = 16) (17.4 vs. 11.8 months, p = 0.32; and 13.1 vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.11, respectively). The median OS and PFS were not significantly different between TMZ (N = 20) and TMZ/Bev (N = 10) chemotherapy (median OS: TMZ 12.9 months vs. TMZ/Bev 14.6 months, p = 0.93, median PFS: TMZ 8.5 months vs TMZ/Bev 10.0 months, p = 0.64, respectively). The median time until Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score decreasing below 60 points was 7.9 months. The best radiological responses included 11 patients with a partial response (36.7%). Grade 3/4 toxicities included leukopenia in 15 patients (50%), anorexia in 4 (13.3%), and hyponatremia during concomitant chemotherapy in 3 (10%). Conclusion Our hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen combined with TMZ or TMZ/Bev showed benefits in terms of OS, PFS, and KPS maintenance with acceptable toxicities in elderly patients with GBM aged ≥75 years.

Preliminary results from a phase II study of infusional 5-FU, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3579-3579 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kopetz ◽  
J. L. Abbruzzese ◽  
C. Eng ◽  
R. B. Adinin ◽  
J. Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

3579 Background: Irinotecan (I) plus bolus 5-FU (F) and leucovorin (L) comprise the IFL regimen, a very active treatment in mCRC when combined with bevacizumab (B). The response rate (RR) for IFL-B given as first-line treatment is 45%, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 10.6 months and a median survival of 20.3 months. The IFL regimen is now considered inferior to infusional 5-FU regimens, such as FOLFIRI, which have less toxicity and improved efficacy. Methods: We designed a 43 patient (pt), single-arm phase II trial of FOLFIRI-B with B (5mg/kg), I (180mg/m2), bolus of F (400mg/m2) and L (400mg/m2) followed by a 46-hour infusion of F (2400mg/m2), with a primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS). Chemotherapy naïve mCRC patients (pts) with adequate organ function and performance status 0–2 received B alone on Day minus 14, starting FOLFIRI + B on Day 1. DCE-MRI and laboratory correlates were completed before and after B alone and cycle 1. Once cycle is equivalent to two weeks. Results: 21 pts, median age 59 y/o (range 26–75), M:F = 15:6, 4 with prior F in adjuvant setting, have been enrolled to date. 20 pts are evaluable for response. One pt is too early. A total of 215 cycles have been administered (median 11). Median PFS has not been reached after a median follow-up of 8 months. By intent-to-treat analysis, there were 14 PRs (70%), and 5 (25%) pts with stable disease observed (including 1 unconfirmed PR). PRs were observed from 9 to 35 weeks after the first cycle (median: 18 weeks). 9 pts remain on treatment (1–12 months); 12 pts are off study (3 for progressive disease, 1 withdrew, 4 sent for curative surgery, 2 for toxicity, 2 sent for surgery unrelated to cancer). Toxicity included 10 cases of grade 3 neutropenia, including 1 febrile neutropenia, 4 venous thrombi, and 6 cases of hypertension requiring medication change. One pt included in the analysis developed peritonitis, considered a possible microperforation, after B alone and never received FOLFIRI. No ≥ grade 3 diarrhea was observed. Analysis of correlative studies will be presented at a later date. Conclusion: Our preliminary results indicate that FOLFIRI-B is well tolerated and an excellent choice as a first-line treatment for mCRC. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of pemetrexed (Pem) and cisplatin (Cis) plus cetuximab (Cet) followed by Pem and Cet maintenance therapy in patients (Pts) with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7554-7554
Author(s):  
Gerald Schmid-Bindert ◽  
Vittorio Gebbia ◽  
Frank Mayer ◽  
Edurne Arriola ◽  
Diego Marquez-Medina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
One Year

7554 Background: A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study was conducted to assess the effect of adding cet to pem and cis in pts with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Methods: 113 Caucasian performance status 0-1 pts received 1st line pem (500 mg/m2) and cis (75 mg/m2) on day 1 (21d cycle) for 4-6 cycles and cet (400 mg/m2 loading dose followed by 250 mg/m2) weekly. Non-progressive pts received pem 500 mg/m2 on day 1 (21d cycle) plus cet (250mg/m2 weekly) until progression. Pts received vitamin B12/folic acid and dexamethasone. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) (RECIST 1.0). Secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), 1 year survival rate, translational research (TR) and safety. Results: Pts’ characteristics: median age 59.7 years, 64% male, 50% PS 0, 92% stage IV, and 78% adenocarcinoma. All pts completed ≥ 1 cycle of induction therapy and 45% and 43% completed ≥ 1 cycle of maintenance with pem and cet, respectively. ORR (n=109) was 38.5% (80% CI 32.2-45.1), all partial responses. Disease control rate (response/stable disease) was 59.6% (80% CI: 53.1-65.9). Median PFS was 5.82 months (80% CI: 4.40-6.70). One year survival rate was 0.45 (80% CI: 0.39-0.51). Significant associations were seen between high EGFR by IHC and increased PFS (cytoplasm: HR=0.46, p=0.035; membrane: HR=0.41, p=0.008), and between high nuclear TTF-1 and increased ORR (OR=7.73, p=0.021) / PFS (HR=0.21, p<0.001) / OS (HR=0.25, p=0.035). Of 113 pts evaluated for safety, 73 (64.6%) pts had drug related CTC Grade 3/4 adverse events (AE): most frequent were neutropenia (14.2%), rash (15%), and vomiting (8.8%). Drug related serious AEs were reported in 27.4% pts: most frequent were anemia (5.3%), neutropenia (5.3%), vomiting (3.5%), and rash, renal failure, diarrhea and fatigue (1.8% each). There were 2 potential on-study drug related deaths (sudden death and large intestinal perforation). Conclusions: Pem, cis and cet appeared efficacious and tolerable. These results support further evaluation in a randomized trial. The TR outcomes are hypothesis generating given the study’s size and nonrandomized nature.

Phase III study of nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) plus gemcitabine (Gem) versus Gem alone in patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPC): Subgroup analysis of Canadian pts from the MPACT trial.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 439-439
Author(s):  
Mustapha Ali Tehfe ◽  
Scot D. Dowden ◽  
Hagen F. Kennecke ◽  
Robert Hassan El-Maraghi ◽  
Bernard Lesperance ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Intent To Treat

439 Background: Weekly nab-P + Gem is a new option for first-line treatment (Tx) of mPC. In the MPACT trial, nab-P/Gem demonstrated superior overall survival (OS; primary endpoint) vs Gem alone as first-line Tx of mPC (Table). Here we report a subgroup analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety outcomes with nab-P + Gem vs Gem alone from the Canadian cohort of the MPACT trial. Methods: Previously untreated pts (N = 861) with mPC were randomized 1:1 (stratified by Karnofsky Performance Status [KPS], region, and the presence of liver metastases) to receive nab-P 125 mg/m2 + Gem 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle or Gem 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 7 weeks followed by 1 week of rest (cycle 1) and then days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle (cycle ≥ 2). Results: 63 pts from Canada enrolled in the MPACT trial. Baseline pt characteristics were well balanced. Median age was 61 years and KPS was similar for both groups and comparable to the intent-to-treat (ITT) populations. Primary lesion in the pancreatic head was more common among pts in the nab-P + Gem vs Gem arm (55% vs 30%); use of biliary stent was similar (33% nab-P + Gem; 27% Gem). Median OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were longer with nab-P + Gem vs Gem (Table). Median Tx duration was 4.2 mo with nab-P + Gem vs 3.2 mo with Gem. Use of subsequent therapy was 30% in the nab-P + Gem arm vs 43% in the Gem arm. The median relative dose intensity for Gem was similar in each arm (81% nab-P + Gem vs 85% Gem). The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs for nab-P + Gem vs Gem were neutropenia (22% vs 10%), fatigue (34% vs 33%), and neuropathy (25% vs 0%). Conclusions: Canadian pts participating in MPACT were similar to the ITT population and nab-P + Gem was well tolerated and showed improved median OS, PFS, and ORR vs Gem alone, although not statistically significant (likely due to the small number of pts). Clinical trial information: NCT00844649. [Table: see text]

A randomized phase II trial comparing different schedules of nab-paclitaxel (nabP) combined with gemcitabine (GEM) as first line treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4100-4100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippa Corrie ◽  
Wendi Qian ◽  
Bristi Basu ◽  
Juan W. Valle ◽  
Stephen Falk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cytidine Deaminase ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Age Range

4100 Background: NabP+GEM chemotherapy improves survival compared with GEM monotherapy as treatment for mPDAC. A PDAC mouse model suggested that nabP potentiates GEM activity by reducing cytidine deaminase levels and scheduling may be critical to optimise clinical benefit. Methods: Patients (pts) were randomised to receive standard concomitant (CON) nabP+GEM or sequential (SEQ) administration, with nabP given 24 hours before GEM. After 6 cycles, pts benefiting from treatment could continue the same regimen until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1; secondary endpoints included safety, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL). Serial blood and baseline tumour samples were collected for exploratory biomarkers. Results: Between March 2014 and 2016, 146 pts (71 SEQ, 75 CON) were recruited. Median age (range) was 66 (45-82) years; Karnofsky performance status was 70 (in 12% pts), 80 (27%), 90 (38%) or 100 (24%); 47% had pancreatic head primaries; 84% had liver metastases. Median no. cycles received was 4 SEQ, 3 CON; 51 pts (35%) received ≥6 cycles of treatment (42% SEQ, 28% CON). A 24+2hr interval was achieved in > 90% SEQ admin. Grade ≥3 adverse events experienced by ≥10% pts (SEQ, CON) were neutropaenia (54%, 30%; p = 0.003), febrile neutropaenia (12%, 12%), fatigue (22%, 15%), vomiting (7%, 11%) and anaemia (10%, 5%). G-CSF was administered at local investigator's discretion to 35 pts (23 SEQ, 12 CON; p = 0.015). To date, 112 pts have died. 6 month (m) PFS by SEQ and CON arms were 47% and 33%; median PFS were 5.8 and 4.0m; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.46-0.95; 12m OS by SEQ and CON arms were 29% and 26%; median OS were 10.1 and 7.9m; HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.61-1.29. ORR was 50% SEQ and 33% CON (p = 0.065). Mean baseline QoL Global health status score was 60.6 SEQ and 63.4 CON. The mean change in QoL score from baseline at 24 weeks was -2.1 SEQ and -12.1 CON. Conclusions: Sequential delivery of nabP combined with GEM trended towards improving all clinically relevant efficacy end points: PFS, OS, and ORR. Translational correlates will be reported in due course. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN71070888.

scholarly journals Radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with lung oligometastases

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goda Kalinauskaite ◽  
Ingeborg Tinhofer ◽  
Marcus Kufeld ◽  
Anne Kathrin Kluge ◽  
Arne Grün ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: Patients with oligometastatic disease can potentially be cured by using an ablative therapy for all active lesions. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a non-invasive treatment option that lately proved to be as effective and safe as surgery in treating lung metastases (LM). However, it is not clear which patients benefit most and what are the most suitable fractionation regimes. The aim of this study was to analyze treatment outcomes after single fraction radiosurgery (SFRS) and fractionated SBRT (fSBRT) in patients with lung oligometastases and identify prognostic clinical features for better survival outcomes. Methods: Fifty-two patients with 94 LM treated with SFRS or fSBRT between 2010 and 2016 were analyzed. The characteristics of primary tumor, LM, treatment, toxicity profiles and outcomes were assessed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used for estimation of local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression free survival and distant metastases free survival (DMFS). Results: Ninety-four LM in 52 patients were treated using SFRS/fSBRT with a median of 2 lesions per patient (range: 1–5). The median planning target volume (PTV)-encompassing dose for SFRS was 24 Gy (range: 17-26) compared to 45 Gy (range: 20-60) in 2-12 fractions in fSBRT. The median follow-up time was 21 months (range: 3-68). LC rates at 1 and 2 years for SFSR vs. fSBRT were 89% and 83% vs. 75% and 59%, respectively (p=0.026). LM treated with SFSR were significantly smaller (p=0.001). The 1 and 2-year OS rates for all patients were 84% and 71%, respectively. In univariate analysis treatment with SFRS, an interval of ≥ 12 months between diagnosis of LM and treatment, non-colorectal cancer histology and BED <100 Gy were significantly associated with better LC. However, none of these parameters remained significant in the multivariate Cox regression model. OS was significantly better in patients with negative lymph nodes (N0), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >70% and time to first metastasis ≥12 months. There was no grade 3 acute or late toxicity. Conclusions: We observed good LC and low toxicity rates after SFRS for small lung metastases. Longer time to first metastasis, good KPS and N0 predicted better OS.

Ultrafractionated radiation therapy (3x per day) for glioblastoma: Preliminary results of a phase II study

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1570-1570
Author(s):  
P. D. Beauchesne ◽  
L. Taillandier ◽  
V. Bernier ◽  
M. Djabri ◽  
X. Michel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3

1570 Background: Ultrafractionation radiation therapy consists in irradiating cells or tumors several times daily, delivering low doses at which hyperradiosensitivity occur. We recently reported the high efficiency of ultrafractionation radiotherapy in glioma cell lines and xenografts, and are now conducting a phase II clinical trial to determine the effect of an ultrafractionation regimen for glioblastoma patients. Methods: A prospective, multicenter, phase II study has opened for accrual in September 2003. Patients over 18 years of age who are able to give informed consent and have histologically proven, newly diagnosed and unresectable, supratentorial glioblastoma (WHO grade IV) are eligible. Three doses of 0.75 Gy spaced by at least four hours are delivered daily, five days a week for six consecutive weeks for a total of 67.5 Gy. Conformal irradiation includes the tumor bulk including a margin of 2.5 cm. Tolerance and toxicity are the primary endpoints; survival and progression-free survival are secondary endpoints. Results: To date 25 patients have been enrolled in this study, 19 currently evalualbe: 11 men and 8 women, median age 58 (range 37 to 76), median Karnofsky performance status (80 range from 70 to 100). The median time between histological diagnosis and the start of treatment is 7 weeks. The ultrafractionated radiation therapy has been well tolerated; no acute grade 3 and/or 4 CNS toxicity has been observed. Minor responses at the end of irradiation were seen in 5 patients. Median survival from initial diagnosis was 13.5 months, nine patients remain alive. Conclusions: Ultrafractionated radiation therapy is safe and well tolerated. No acute CNS toxicitiy has been observed. Overall survival of over 13 months for patients without prior debulking surgery compares favorably with other reports. Updated definitive results will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Preliminary data from a phase II study of cetuximab with irinotecan in heavily pretreated patients with epidermal growth factor (EGFR)-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): LABEL

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14521-14521 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Buzaid ◽  
C. de Cerqueira Mathias ◽  
F. Perazzo ◽  
S. Simon ◽  
L. Fein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Latin American ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

14521 Background: Cetuximab (Erbitux) is a monoclonal antibody directed against EGFR that is active in combination with irinotecan in patients (pts) with mCRC, who have progressed during or after a prior irinotecan therapy. Methods: This open, single-arm phase II Latin American study investigated this combination in pts with EGFR-expressing mCRC progressing on or within 3 months of chemotherapy containing at least 6 weeks (w) of irinotecan-based therapy. The primary objective was to assess the best overall confirmed response rate (RR). Sample size calculations were based on an expected rate of 20% (±8%). Planned enrollment was 100 pts. Secondary objectives were to explore the duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) time, the 12-week PFS rate, and overall survival time. Pts were treated with cetuximab (initial dose 400 mg/m2 then 250 mg/m2 weekly), plus irinotecan at the same dose and schedule (including dose reductions) as pre-study. Preliminary Results: Of 151 pts from 14 centers screened and in the database, 106 (70%, 3 pts missing) were EGFR-expressing and, of these, 79/106 (75%) were treated on-study. Forty (51%) were male; median age was 59 years [27–82]; 70 (89%) pts had a Karnofsky performance status = 90 and 9 (11%) pts = 80. Nineteen (24%) pts had received = 3 prior treatment regimens, 42 (53%) were previously treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen for metastatic disease. The confirmed overall RR was 26.6% [17.3–37.7]. Median DOR was 23.9 w [17.1–30], median PFS time was 17.7 w [11.7–18.9], and the 12-week PFS rate was 58% [47–69]. Thirty-three (42%) pts were alive at data cut-off. Median survival was 9.7 months [7.9–13.1]. Treatment was well tolerated with the most common grade 3/4 adverse events including: diarrhea, 20%; neutropenia,10%; acne-like rash, 9%. No grade 3/4 infusion-related reactions were reported. Conclusions: The overall confirmed RRs observed in this heavily pretreated population fully met the expectations for the primary endpoint of this study. LABEL confirmed in a Latin American setting the activity and safety of cetuximab plus irinotecan seen in previous studies. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Updated survival results of the randomized phase II study comparing cisplatin/capecitabine (CX) with epirubicin plus CX (ECX) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 46-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Lim ◽  
J. Yun ◽  
J. Lee ◽  
S. Park ◽  
J. Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

46 Background: We previously reported results of a randomized study showing that CX is equally active to ECX in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) (Yun et al. Eur J Cancer. 2010). Here we report updated overall survival (OS) results with an additional 12 months' follow-up. Methods: Ninety-one chemotherapy-naïve patients with histologically-confirmed, measurable AGC were randomized to receive CX (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 iv on day 1 and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 bid po on days 1-14, n=45) or ECX (epirubicin 50 mg/m2 plus CX, n=44) every 3 weeks. After CX or ECX had failed, second-line chemotherapy (SLC) was recommended for all patients if their performance status was preserved. Results: Treatment duration was similar for both arms (4.4 for CX v 4.2 months for ECX). There was no relevant difference in the occurrence of overall grade 3 or 4 toxicities between the CX and ECX arms (80% v 78%, respectively; p=0.516). However, none in the CX and 12% in the ECX arm discontinued treatment because of toxicity. There were no significant differences in therapeutic efficacy between CX and ECX with respect to the response rate (38% v 37%, respectively), PFS (6.4 v 6.5 months), as well as OS (12.7 v 13.8 months; p=0.51). After failure, 60% of patients (26 CX and 28 ECX patients) received SLC. However, OS was not differed whether a patient was treated with SLC or not (13.1 v 11.2 months; p=0.94). Conclusions: The present analysis confirms previous findings that both CX and ECX appear to be comparatively active as first-line chemotherapy for AGC. Furthermore, the role of SLC in AGC warrants further evaluation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document