Methylnaltrexone treatment of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9081-9081 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. B. Karver ◽  
N. E. Slatkin ◽  
J. Thomas ◽  
R. J. Israel
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Opioid Withdrawal ◽  
Withdrawal Symptoms ◽  
Advanced Illness ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Study Drug Administration ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Clinically Significant

9081 Background: Constipation is a common and distressing side effect of opioid treatment particularly in patients with cancer. Two phase 3 trials (Studies 301 and 302) reported that subcutaneous (SC) methylnaltrexone was well tolerated and effective in inducing laxation in patients with advanced illness with opioid-induced constipation (OIC) while maintaining central analgesia. Aims: To evaluate improvement in constipation in cancer patients treated with methylnaltrexone in the above studies. Methods: In Study 301, 124 cancer patients received a single dose of methylnaltrexone (SC 0.15mg/kg, 0.30mg/kg) or placebo. In Study 302, 78 cancer patients received either 0.15mg/kg SC QOD methylnaltrexone for 2 weeks (total of 7 doses) or placebo. Patients had a life expectancy of 1–6 months, no laxation within 48 hours, and were maintained on stable opioids and baseline laxatives. The primary efficacy endpoints were laxation within 4 hours after a single or first dose of study drug and laxation within 4 hours for at least 2 of the first 4 doses (Study 302). The secondary endpoints were laxation within 24 hours, pain scores, and opioid withdrawal symptoms. Results: A majority of the methylnaltrexone-treated cancer patients had a laxation within the first 4 hours of study drug administration ( Table ). There were no clinically significant changes in pain scores or opioid withdrawal symptoms. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that in cancer patients with advanced illness and OIC, methylnaltrexone significantly improved constipation, without loss of pain control or opioid withdrawal. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals The influence of brain metastases on the central nervous system effects of methylnaltrexone: a post hoc analysis of 3 randomized, double-blind studies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren M. Brenner ◽  
Neal E. Slatkin ◽  
Nancy Stambler ◽  
Robert J. Israel ◽  
Paul H. Coluzzi
Keyword(s):  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Opioid Withdrawal ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Opioid Receptor Antagonists ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Purpose Peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists such as methylnaltrexone (MNTX, Relistor®) are indicated for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC). The structural properties unique to MNTX restrict it from traversing the blood-brain barrier (BBB); however, the BBB may become more permeable in patients with brain metastases. We investigated whether the presence of brain metastases in cancer patients compromises the central effects of opioids among patients receiving MNTX for OIC. Methods This post hoc analysis of pooled data from 3 randomized, placebo-controlled trials included cancer patients with OIC who received MNTX or placebo. Endpoints included changes from baseline in pain scores, rescue-free laxation (RFL) within 4 or 24 h of the first dose, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including those potentially related to opioid withdrawal symptoms. Results Among 356 cancer patients in the pooled population, 47 (MNTX n = 27; placebo n = 20) had brain metastases and 309 (MNTX n = 172; placebo n = 137) did not have brain metastases. No significant differences in current pain, worst pain, or change in pain scores from baseline were observed between patients treated with MNTX or placebo. Among patients with brain metastases, a significantly greater proportion of patients who received MNTX versus placebo achieved an RFL within 4 h after the first dose (70.4% vs 15.0%, respectively, p = 0.0002). TEAEs were similar between treatment groups and were generally gastrointestinal in nature and not related to opioid withdrawal. Conclusion Focal disruptions of the BBB caused by brain metastases did not appear to alter central nervous system penetrance of MNTX.

Enoxaparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism Associated With Central Vein Catheter: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study in Cancer Patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (18) ◽  
pp. 4057-4062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melina Verso ◽  
Giancarlo Agnelli ◽  
Sergio Bertoglio ◽  
Franco C. Di Somma ◽  
Francesco Paoletti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Placebo Treatment ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Central Vein ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Study Drug Administration

Purpose The extent of venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with central vein catheters (CVC) in cancer patients remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the low molecular weight heparin, enoxaparin, in the prevention of VTE. Patients and Methods In a multicenter, double-blind study, consecutive cancer patients scheduled for CVC insertion were randomly assigned to receive either subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once a day or placebo. Treatment was started 2 hours before CVC insertion and continued for 6 weeks. The primary end points of the study were deep vein thrombosis (DVT), confirmed by venography of the CVC limb performed 6 weeks after randomization, or clinically overt pulmonary embolism, confirmed by objective testing during the study drug administration. Patients were assessed for bleeding complications. Results Three hundred eighty-five patients were randomized, of which 321 (83.4%) underwent venography. A venography was adequate for adjudication in 155 patients in each treatment group. A DVT was observed in 22 patients (14.1%) treated with enoxaparin and in 28 patients (18.0%) treated with placebo, corresponding to a relative risk of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.47 to 1.31). No major bleeding occurred. Five patients (2.6%) in the enoxaparin group and two patients (1.0%) in the placebo group died during the treatment period. Conclusion In this study, no difference in the rate of CVC-related VTE was detected between patients receiving enoxaparin and patients receiving placebo. The dose of enoxaparin used in this study proved to be safe. Clinical trials evaluating higher enoxaparin doses could optimize the efficacy of this agent for this indication.

scholarly journals Monitored Anesthesia Care with Dexmedetomidine Supplemented by Midazolam/Fentanyl versus Midazolam/Fentanyl Alone in Patients Undergoing Pleuroscopy: Effect on Oxygenation and Respiratory Function

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3510
Author(s):  
Andreas Kostroglou ◽  
Emmanouil I. Kapetanakis ◽  
Paraskevi Matsota ◽  
Periklis Tomos ◽  
Konstantinos Kostopanagiotou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gas Exchange ◽  
Respiratory Function ◽  
Lung Mechanics ◽  
Procedural Sedation And Analgesia ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Fentanyl Consumption ◽  
Sedation And Analgesia ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Fentanyl Group

Although pleuroscopy is considered a safe and well tolerated procedure with a low complication rate, it requires the administration of procedural sedation and analgesia. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of dexmedetomidine administration on oxygenation and respiratory function in patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic pleuroscopy. Through a prospective, single center, cohort study, we studied 55 patients receiving either a dexmedetomidine intravenous infusion supplemented by midazolam/fentanyl (Group DEX + MZ/F) or a conventional sedation protocol with midazolam/fentanyl (Group MZ/F). Our primary outcome was the changes in lung gas exchange (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) obtained at baseline and at predetermined end points, while changes in respiratory mechanics (FEV1, FVC and the ratio FEV1/FVC) and PaCO2 levels, drug consumption, time to recover from sedation and adverse events were our secondary endpoints (NCT03597828). We found a lower postoperative decrease in FEV1 volumes in Group DEX + MZ/F compared to Group MZ/F (p = 0.039), while FVC, FEV1/FVC and gas exchange values did not differ between groups. We also found a significant reduction in midazolam (p < 0.001) and fentanyl consumption (p < 0.001), along with a more rapid recovery of alertness postprocedure in Group DEX + MZ/F compared to Group MZ/F (p = 0.003), while pain scores during the postoperative period, favored the Group DEX + MZ/F (p = 0.020). In conclusion, the use of intravenous dexmedetomidine during pleuroscopy is associated with a smaller decrease in FEV1, reduction of the consumption of supplementary sedatives and analgesics and quicker awakening of patients postoperatively, when compared to midazolam/fentanyl. Therefore, dexmedetomidine administration may provide clinically significant benefits in terms of lung mechanics and faster recovery of patients undergoing pleuroscopy.

Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in cancer patients treated with fidaxomicin or vancomycin.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9067-9067
Author(s):  
Oliver A. Cornely ◽  
Mark Miller ◽  
Bruno Fantin ◽  
Kathleen M. Mullane ◽  
Yin Kean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Bowel Movements ◽  
65 H ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Clostridium Difficile Associated Diarrhea

9067 Background: Oncology patients are at risk for infections, including C difficile infection (CDI). Fidaxomicin (FDX) is a novel antibiotic highly specific for C difficile with improved sustained response compared with vancomycin (VAN). Another important clinical outcome of CDI is time to resolution of diarrhea (TTROD), corresponding to the duration of passing unformed bowel movements. Methods: 183 patients with a current diagnosis of cancer were compared to non-cancer patients from a combined population of 1105 subjects with CDI in two phase 3 trials comparing 10 days of treatment with FDX (400 mg/day) or VAN (500 mg/day). Number of unformed bowel movements (UBM) per 24 h was monitored. Response was considered as ≤3 UBM/24 h. Time to resolution of diarrhea was defined as time in hours from the first dose of study drug to the last UBM on the day preceding two days of ≤3 UBM/24 h. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (K-M) used the log rank test for significance (p<0.05). Results: The response rate at end of treatment was 79.2% for 183 patients with cancer, compared to 88.6% for 922 patients without cancer (p<0.001). Median TTROD was longer by 45 h in patients with cancer than those without. In the VAN treatment group, median TTROD was 65 h longer in patients with cancer vs those without and significant by K-M. In the FDX group, although median TTROD was longer by 20 h in patients with cancer vs those without, the difference was not significant by K-M. For patients with cancer, TTROD was significantly shorter during treatment with FDX than with VAN. Conclusions: Patients with cancer responded more slowly to treatment for CDI than did non-cancer patients; however, resolution of diarrhea was more rapid by 49 h during treatment with FDX than with VAN. [Table: see text]

506 Samelisant: Baseline Characteristics from a Phase 2 Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Narcolepsy

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A199-A199
Author(s):  
Ramakrishna Nirogi ◽  
Jyothsna Ravula ◽  
Pradeep Jayarajan ◽  
Satish Jetta ◽  
Gopinadh Bhyrapuneni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Fixed Ratio ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Healthy Humans ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Introduction histamine H3 receptor (H3R) antagonists/ inverse agonists increase histaminergic neurotransmission and offer a therapeutic option for the treatment of narcolepsy. Samelisant (SUVN-G3031) is a potent and selective H3R inverse agonist exhibited selectivity over 70 other targets. Samelisant showed wake-promoting and anticataplectic effects in orexin knockout mice suggesting its potential therapeutic utility in the treatment of EDS and cataplexy associated with narcolepsy. Safety and tolerability studies in animals and healthy humans suggested a favorable risk/benefit profile. Methods The current study is a 2 week treatment, multicenter, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel-group study in patients with Narcolepsy with or without Cataplexy. Eligibility criteria include age between 18 to 50 years old, an ESS score of ≥ 12; and mean MWT time of &lt; 12 minutes and a confirm diagnosis of narcolepsy as per ICSD-3. Further, the randomization will be stratified according to type of narcolepsy (Type-1 or Type-2). Each subject will receive either placebo or study drug once daily for 2 weeks in a fixed ratio of 1:1:1. The primary efficacy endpoint is change in maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT) score from baseline to week 2. Key secondary endpoints include change from baseline to week 2 in ESS and an improvement in CGI-S scores. Safety will be monitored by medical monitor and by an independent data safety monitoring committee. Baseline clinical and demographic data for the currently enrolled study is summarized descriptively. Since the study is blinded, a breakdown of baseline characteristics by treatment group will not be available until after completion. Results As of data cutoff date of Dec 20, 2020, a total of 54 subjects were completed in the study. The median age of subjects was 30 years (range: 18 - 50 years) with mean BMI of 28.6 (range: 18.3 - 43.1 kg/m2). Overall, 74% of subjects were female and 83% were Caucasian. Mean (SD) baseline values of MWT and ESS are 5.65 (3.5) and 16.7 (2.5), respectively. Conclusion Baseline characteristics are consistent with the general narcolepsy population. The study is currently enrolling the subjects with Narcolepsy with or without Cataplexy, and the Data readout is expected in the second half of 2021. Support (if any):

scholarly journals Phase II study of an oxaliplatin-based regimen for relapsed colon cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (INSPIRE study)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiichiro Ishibashi ◽  
Toru Aoyama ◽  
Masahito Kotaka ◽  
Hironaga Satake ◽  
Yasushi Tsuji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Peripheral Sensory ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy with re-introduction of oxaliplatin (OX) more than 6 months after adjuvant chemotherapy including OX. Methods Stage II/III colon cancer patients with neuropathies of grade ≤ 1 who relapsed more than 6 months after adjuvant chemotherapy including OX were considered eligible. Eligible patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil, l-leucovorin and OX plus molecularly targeted agents or capecitabine and OX plus bevacizumab (BV) or S-1 and OX plus BV. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and toxicity. Results A total of 50 patients were enrolled between September 2013 and May 2019. Twelve patients received 5-fluorouracil, l-leucovorin and OX (FOLFOX) plus BV, 21 patients received capecitabine and OX plus BV, 10 patients received S-1 and OX plus BV and 7 patients received FOLFOX plus cetuximab or panitumumab. The median PFS was 11.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.3–16.0), the median OS was 45.4 months (95% CI 37.4–NA), and the RR was 56.0% (95% CI 42.3–68.8). Adverse events of grade ≥ 3 that occurred in ≥ 5% of cases were neutropenia in 6 patients (12%), peripheral sensory neuropathy in 5 patients (10%), diarrhea in 4 patients (8%), hypertension in 4 patients (8%), anorexia in 3 patients (6%) and allergic reactions in 3 patients (6%). Conclusions First-line chemotherapy with re-introduction of OX more than 6 months after adjuvant chemotherapy including OX can be used safely with expected efficacy for relapsed colon cancer patients.

Accuracy incentives and framing effects to minimize the influence of cognitive bias among advanced cancer patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 135910532110256
Author(s):  
Eric A Finkelstein ◽  
Yin Bun Cheung ◽  
Maurice E Schweitzer ◽  
Lai Heng Lee ◽  
Ravindran Kanesvaran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Cognitive Biases ◽  
Survey Design ◽  
Framing Effects ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Illness ◽  
Treatment Benefits ◽  
Hypothetical Treatment ◽  
Survival Expectations

Many patients with advanced illness have unrealistic survival expectations, largely due to cognitive biases. Studies suggests that when people are motivated to be accurate, they are less prone to succumb to these biases. Using a randomized survey design, we test whether offering advanced cancer patients ( n = 200) incentives to estimate their prognosis improves accuracy. We also test whether presenting treatment benefits in terms of a loss (mortality) rather than a gain (survival) reduces willingness to take up a hypothetical treatment. Results are not consistent with the proposed hypotheses for either accuracy incentives or framing effects.

scholarly journals Randomized, controlled trial of lasmiditan over four migraine attacks: Findings from the CENTURION study

Cephalalgia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Messoud Ashina ◽  
Uwe Reuter ◽  
Timothy Smith ◽  
Judith Krikke-Workel ◽  
Suzanne R Klise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Statistical Testing ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Common Teaes

Background We present findings from the multicenter, double-blind Phase 3 study, CENTURION. This study was designed to assess the efficacy of and consistency of response to lasmiditan in the acute treatment of migraine across four attacks. Methods Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to one of three treatment groups – lasmiditan 200 mg; lasmiditan 100 mg; or a control group that received placebo for three attacks and lasmiditan 50 mg for either the third or fourth attack. The primary endpoints were pain freedom at 2 h (first attack) and pain freedom at 2 h in ≥2/3 attacks. Secondary endpoints included pain relief, sustained pain freedom and disability freedom. Statistical testing used a logistic regression model and graphical methodology to control for multiplicity. Results Overall, 1471 patients treated ≥1 migraine attack with the study drug. Both primary endpoints were met for lasmiditan 100 mg and 200 mg ( p < 0.001). All gated secondary endpoints were met. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was highest during the first attack. The most common TEAEs with lasmiditan were dizziness, paresthesia, fatigue, and nausea; these were generally mild or moderate in severity. Conclusions These results confirm the early and sustained efficacy of lasmiditan 100 mg and 200 mg and demonstrate consistency of response across multiple attacks. Trial Registration Number: NCT03670810

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document