Efficacy and safety of first-line bevacizumab (Bv) and cisplatin/gemcitabine (CG) in elderly patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the BO17704 study (AVAiL)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8050-8050 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. B. Leighl ◽  
P. Zatloukal ◽  
J. Mezger ◽  
R. Ramlau ◽  
V. Archer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Safety Signals

8050 Background: AVAiL, an international, placebo-controlled, phase III trial, evaluated Bv plus CG in pts with previously untreated advanced, non-squamous NSCLC, with performance status 0/1. A retrospective analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of Bv plus CG in the subpopulation of elderly pts (≥65 years [yrs]). Methods: 1,043 pts (age 20–83) were randomized to C 80mg/m2 and G 1,250mg/m2 q3w for up to 6 cycles plus either Bv 7.5mg/kg q3w (Bv 7.5; n=345), Bv 15mg/kg q3w (Bv 15; n=351) or placebo (Pl; n=347). Bv/Pl was administered until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (RR) and safety. Efficacy and safety were compared between pts <65 yrs vs ≥65 yrs. Results: Efficacy data were available for 304 pts ≥65 yrs (median age 68), and 739 pts <65 yrs (median age 55). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. In the Bv arms, 179 pts (93%) received ≥1 cycle of treatment; 85 (47.5%) completed >6 cycles. Bv-treated pts ≥65 yrs derived an improvement in PFS compared to Pl (Bv 7.5: HR 0.71, p 0.023; Bv 15: HR 0.84, p= 0.25). ORRs were 40%, 29% and 30% for pts ≥65 in the Bv 7.5, Bv 15 and Pl arms. Survival was similar in all treatment arms regardless of age, (pts ≥65 Bv 7.5 HR 0.84; Bv 15 HR 0.88, p=NS). Safety data were available for 284 pts ≥65 yrs and 702 pts <65 yrs. There were no safety signals of concern in older patients. Grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 84%, 80% and 80% of older pts treated with Bv 7.5, Bv 15 and Pl. Pts ≥65 yrs had no episodes of severe hemoptysis, but in Bv 7.5 and Pl arms, were more likely to have other bleeding, compared to pts <65. The incidence of hypertension and febrile neutropenia were similar in pts ≥65 and <65 yrs. Treatment-related deaths were not increased in Bv-treated pts ≥65 yrs vs pts <65 yrs or in Bv-arms vs Pl. Conclusions: The PFS benefit from Bv-based treatment in the elderly subpopulation is similar to that observed in the overall patient population. No particular safety signals were identified in this population, suggesting acceptable tolerability of Bv in elderly pts in AVAiL. [Table: see text]

The anti–PD-1 antibody spartalizumab in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib in advanced BRAF V600–mutant melanoma: Efficacy and safety findings from parts 1 and 2 of the Phase III COMBI-i trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10028-10028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgina V. Long ◽  
Celeste Lebbe ◽  
Victoria Atkinson ◽  
Mario Mandalà ◽  
Paul D. Nathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

10028 Background: Treatment (tx) with checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy improves outcomes in patients (pts) with BRAF V600–mutant advanced melanoma; however, many pts subsequently progress and die. Preliminary evidence suggests that targeted therapy may enhance the impact of checkpoint inhibitors and improve efficacy compared with either treatment alone. Methods: COMBI-i is investigating first-line spartalizumab 400 mg every 4 wk + dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily + trametinib 2 mg once daily in pts with unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600–mutant melanoma (NCT02967692). We report efficacy and safety data from parts 1 (run-in cohort) and 2 (biomarker cohort), with a median follow-up of 24.3 mo. Response was assessed per RECIST v1.1. The randomized part 3 is ongoing. Results: 36 pts were enrolled (part 1: n = 9; part 2: n = 27); 20 (56%) had stage IV M1c disease and 15 (42%) had elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (≥ upper limit of normal). At the data cutoff (August 19, 2019), tx was ongoing in 10 pts (28%). The confirmed investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) was 78% (n = 28), with 16 complete responses (CRs; 44%) and 12 partial responses (33%). Median duration of response (DOR; 10/28 responders with events) was not reached (NR); 24-mo DOR rate was 53.4% (95% CI, 29%-73%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 22.7 mo; 24-mo PFS rate was 41.4% (95% CI, 23%-59%). At the cutoff, median overall survival (OS) was NR, with a 24-mo OS rate of 74.1% (95% CI, 56%-86%). In pts with elevated LDH, ORR was 67%, with 4 CRs (27%); median PFS was 10.7 mo (95% CI, 4.6-19.1 mo), and median OS was NR. The estimated 24-mo PFS and OS rates in these pts were 26.7% and 52.5%, respectively. All pts had ≥ 1 tx-related adverse event (TRAEs); 26 (72%) had grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. The most common grade ≥ 3 TRAEs were pyrexia (17%), increased lipase (11%), neutropenia (11%), increased blood creatine phosphokinase (8%), and increased γ-glutamyltransferase (8%). AEs leading to discontinuation of all 3 study drugs occurred in 6 pts (17%). All-causality grade ≥ 3 AEs requiring immunosuppressive medication occurred in 19 pts (53%). One pt died of cardiac arrest that was not considered tx related. Conclusions: The combination of spartalizumab + dabrafenib + trametinib resulted in high ORR and CR rates, with a high frequency of durable responses, including in patients with poor prognostic factors. Clinical trial information: NCT02967692.

Vandetanib versus erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of at least one prior cytotoxic chemotherapy: A randomized, double-blind phase III trial (ZEST)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8009-8009
Author(s):  
R. B. Natale ◽  
S. Thongprasert ◽  
F. A. Greco ◽  
M. Thomas ◽  
C. M. Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Equivalent Efficacy ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

8009 Background: Vandetanib is a once-daily oral inhibitor of VEGFR, EGFR and RET signaling. This phase III study compared the efficacy of vandetanib vs erlotinib in patients (pts) with advanced, previously treated NSCLC. Methods: Eligible pts (stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, PS 0–2, 1–2 prior chemotherapies; all histologies permitted) were randomized 1:1 to receive vandetanib 300 mg/day or erlotinib 150 mg/day until progression/toxicity. The primary objective was to show superiority in progression-free survival (PFS) for vandetanib vs erlotinib. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), time to deterioration of symptoms (TDS; EORTC QoL Questionnaire) and safety. Results: Between Oct 06-Nov 07, 1240 pts (mean age 61 yrs; 38% female; 22% squamous) were randomized to receive vandetanib (n=623) or erlotinib (n=617). Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms. Median duration of follow-up was 14 months, with 88% pts progressed and 67% dead. There was no difference in PFS for pts treated with vandetanib vs erlotinib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.98, 95.22% CI 0.87–1.10; P=0.721), and no difference in the secondary endpoints of OS (HR 1.01, 95.08% CI 0.89–1.16; P=0.830), ORR (both 12%) and TDS (pain: HR 0.92, P=0.289; dyspnea: HR 1.07, P=0.407; cough: HR 0.94, P=0.455). A preplanned non-inferiority analysis for PFS and OS demonstrated equivalent efficacy for vandetanib and erlotinib. The adverse events (AEs) observed for vandetanib were generally consistent with previous NSCLC studies with vandetanib 300 mg. There was a higher incidence of some AEs (any grade) with vandetanib vs erlotinib, including diarrhea (50% vs 38%) and hypertension (16% vs 2%); rash was more frequent with erlotinib (38% vs 28%). The overall incidence of CTCAE grade ≥3 AEs was also higher with vandetanib (50% vs 40%). The incidence of protocol-defined QTc prolongation in the vandetanib arm was 5%. Conclusions: The study did not meet its primary objective of demonstrating PFS prolongation with vandetanib vs erlotinib in pts with previously treated advanced NSCLC. However, vandetanib and erlotinib showed equivalent efficacy for PFS and OS in a preplanned non-inferiority analysis. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of pemetrexed (Pem) and cisplatin (Cis) plus cetuximab (Cet) followed by Pem and Cet maintenance therapy in patients (Pts) with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7554-7554
Author(s):  
Gerald Schmid-Bindert ◽  
Vittorio Gebbia ◽  
Frank Mayer ◽  
Edurne Arriola ◽  
Diego Marquez-Medina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
One Year

7554 Background: A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study was conducted to assess the effect of adding cet to pem and cis in pts with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Methods: 113 Caucasian performance status 0-1 pts received 1st line pem (500 mg/m2) and cis (75 mg/m2) on day 1 (21d cycle) for 4-6 cycles and cet (400 mg/m2 loading dose followed by 250 mg/m2) weekly. Non-progressive pts received pem 500 mg/m2 on day 1 (21d cycle) plus cet (250mg/m2 weekly) until progression. Pts received vitamin B12/folic acid and dexamethasone. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) (RECIST 1.0). Secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), 1 year survival rate, translational research (TR) and safety. Results: Pts’ characteristics: median age 59.7 years, 64% male, 50% PS 0, 92% stage IV, and 78% adenocarcinoma. All pts completed ≥ 1 cycle of induction therapy and 45% and 43% completed ≥ 1 cycle of maintenance with pem and cet, respectively. ORR (n=109) was 38.5% (80% CI 32.2-45.1), all partial responses. Disease control rate (response/stable disease) was 59.6% (80% CI: 53.1-65.9). Median PFS was 5.82 months (80% CI: 4.40-6.70). One year survival rate was 0.45 (80% CI: 0.39-0.51). Significant associations were seen between high EGFR by IHC and increased PFS (cytoplasm: HR=0.46, p=0.035; membrane: HR=0.41, p=0.008), and between high nuclear TTF-1 and increased ORR (OR=7.73, p=0.021) / PFS (HR=0.21, p<0.001) / OS (HR=0.25, p=0.035). Of 113 pts evaluated for safety, 73 (64.6%) pts had drug related CTC Grade 3/4 adverse events (AE): most frequent were neutropenia (14.2%), rash (15%), and vomiting (8.8%). Drug related serious AEs were reported in 27.4% pts: most frequent were anemia (5.3%), neutropenia (5.3%), vomiting (3.5%), and rash, renal failure, diarrhea and fatigue (1.8% each). There were 2 potential on-study drug related deaths (sudden death and large intestinal perforation). Conclusions: Pem, cis and cet appeared efficacious and tolerable. These results support further evaluation in a randomized trial. The TR outcomes are hypothesis generating given the study’s size and nonrandomized nature.

Randomized phase III study of panitumumab (pmab) vs. cetuximab (cmab) in chemorefractory wild-type (WT) KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Outcomes by hypomagnesemia (hypomag) in ASPECCT.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 705-705
Author(s):  
Timothy Jay Price ◽  
Marc Peeters ◽  
Tae Won Kim ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
Stefano Cascinu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Exon 2 ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Modifications ◽  
Kras Exon

705 Background: ASPECCT met its primary endpoint of non-inferiority of overall survival (OS) of pmab vs. cmab. We evaluate outcomes by hypomag, an on-treatment, anti-EGFR related adverse event that develops due to the inhibition of EGFR function. Conflicting reports have suggested hypomag is associated with survival. Methods: Patients with previously treated WT KRAS exon 2 mCRC were randomized 1:1 to receive pmab or cmab. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of OS. Progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) were secondary endpoints. Patients were categorized ± any grade hypomag during the study and data analyzed by treatment arm. Analysis of Mg supplementation during hypomag was not conducted. Results: 999 patients were randomized and treated: 499 pmab, 500 cmab. Any grade hypomag was 28.8% and grade ≥3 was 7.3% in the pmab arm vs. 18.9% and 2.6% in the cmab arm, respectively. Median time to first hypomag onset was 82 days in the pmab arm and 57 days in the cmab arm. In the pmab arm, 1.0% of patients discontinued treatment and 5% of patients had dose modifications due to hypomag vs. <0.5% and 3% in the cmab arm, respectively. Results are shown (Table). Conclusions: In ASPECCT, rates of hypomag were higher in the pmab vs. the cmab arm. Patients who developed any grade hypomag with pmab or cmab had higher ORR, PFS, and OS compared with those patients who did not. Clinical trial information: NCT00788957. [Table: see text]

A randomized phase II trial comparing different schedules of nab-paclitaxel (nabP) combined with gemcitabine (GEM) as first line treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4100-4100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippa Corrie ◽  
Wendi Qian ◽  
Bristi Basu ◽  
Juan W. Valle ◽  
Stephen Falk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cytidine Deaminase ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Age Range

4100 Background: NabP+GEM chemotherapy improves survival compared with GEM monotherapy as treatment for mPDAC. A PDAC mouse model suggested that nabP potentiates GEM activity by reducing cytidine deaminase levels and scheduling may be critical to optimise clinical benefit. Methods: Patients (pts) were randomised to receive standard concomitant (CON) nabP+GEM or sequential (SEQ) administration, with nabP given 24 hours before GEM. After 6 cycles, pts benefiting from treatment could continue the same regimen until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1; secondary endpoints included safety, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL). Serial blood and baseline tumour samples were collected for exploratory biomarkers. Results: Between March 2014 and 2016, 146 pts (71 SEQ, 75 CON) were recruited. Median age (range) was 66 (45-82) years; Karnofsky performance status was 70 (in 12% pts), 80 (27%), 90 (38%) or 100 (24%); 47% had pancreatic head primaries; 84% had liver metastases. Median no. cycles received was 4 SEQ, 3 CON; 51 pts (35%) received ≥6 cycles of treatment (42% SEQ, 28% CON). A 24+2hr interval was achieved in > 90% SEQ admin. Grade ≥3 adverse events experienced by ≥10% pts (SEQ, CON) were neutropaenia (54%, 30%; p = 0.003), febrile neutropaenia (12%, 12%), fatigue (22%, 15%), vomiting (7%, 11%) and anaemia (10%, 5%). G-CSF was administered at local investigator's discretion to 35 pts (23 SEQ, 12 CON; p = 0.015). To date, 112 pts have died. 6 month (m) PFS by SEQ and CON arms were 47% and 33%; median PFS were 5.8 and 4.0m; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.46-0.95; 12m OS by SEQ and CON arms were 29% and 26%; median OS were 10.1 and 7.9m; HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.61-1.29. ORR was 50% SEQ and 33% CON (p = 0.065). Mean baseline QoL Global health status score was 60.6 SEQ and 63.4 CON. The mean change in QoL score from baseline at 24 weeks was -2.1 SEQ and -12.1 CON. Conclusions: Sequential delivery of nabP combined with GEM trended towards improving all clinically relevant efficacy end points: PFS, OS, and ORR. Translational correlates will be reported in due course. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN71070888.

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with advanced melanoma (MEL) and poor prognostic factors who progressed on or after ipilimumab (IPI): Results from a phase II study (CheckMate 172).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9524-9524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Schadendorf ◽  
Paolo Antonio Ascierto ◽  
John B. A. G. Haanen ◽  
Enrique Espinosa ◽  
Lev V. Demidov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label

9524 Background: In the phase III CheckMate 037 study, NIVO improved the objective response rate and progression-free survival with less toxicity vs chemotherapy in patients (pts) with MEL who progressed after prior IPI treatment. We report the first efficacy and updated safety data from pts with MEL in CheckMate 172, including those with rare melanoma subtypes (uveal, mucosal), brain metastases, or an ECOG performance status (PS) of 2. Methods: In this ongoing phase II, single-arm, open-label, multicenter study, pts with MEL who progressed on or after IPI were treated with NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W for up to 2 years until progression or unacceptable toxicity (NCT02156804). We report efficacy and updated safety data from 734 treated pts with ≥1 year of follow-up (database lock: November 2016). Results: Of 734 pts, 50% had LDH>ULN, 7% ECOG PS 2, 66% M1c disease, 15% a history of brain metastases, and 23% received ≥3 prior therapies. Overall, 593 pts (81%) received more than 4 doses of NIVO. Overall, response rate at 12 weeks was 32%, with a complete response in 1% (Table). The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 63%. Any grade and grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 66% and 17% of pts, respectively. Discontinuations due to treatment-related AEs occurred in 4% of pts. The most common treatment-related select (potentially immune-related) AEs were diarrhea (12%), hypothyroidism (9%), and pruritus (7%). Conclusions: CheckMate 172 is the largest study of NIVO efficacy and safety in pts with MEL who progressed on or after IPI. NIVO demonstrated a safety profile consistent with that of prior clinical trials. Efficacy outcomes were encouraging in some difficult-to-treat subgroups of pts with poor prognostic factors, such as mucosal melanoma and brain metastases. Clinical trial information: NCT02156804. [Table: see text]

Efficacy and safety data from patients with advanced renal cell cancer treated with tivozanib hydrochloride after progression on sorafenib.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 364-364
Author(s):  
Robert John Motzer ◽  
Dmitry Nosov ◽  
Piotr Tomczak ◽  
Anna Berkenblit ◽  
Brooke Esteves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Duration ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Extension Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

364 Background: Tivozanib hydrochloride (tivozanib) is a potent, selective, tyrosine kinase inhibitor of all three vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, with a long half-life and has shown superior efficacy, measured as progression-free survival (PFS), as first-line, targeted therapy vs. sorafenib in a phase III trial (TIVO-1) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (J Clin Oncol2012;30[suppl]:Abstract 4501). Patients who progressed (PD) on sorafenib could receive tivozanib in an open-label, prospective multicenter extension study of TIVO-1. We report preliminary efficacy and safety data for patients who had PD on sorafenib and subsequently received tivozanib in this extension study. Methods: Patients with PD on sorafenib, per RECIST version 1.0, were eligible to receive tivozanib dosed at 1.5 mg/day PO for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week rest, in repeated 4-week cycles, until PD or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were to have been no more than 4 weeks from last dose of sorafenib until initiation of tivozanib, and have an ECOG performance status of ≤2. Dose adjustments were performed as previously reported. Objectives included assessing objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, PFS for tivozanib following PD on sorafenib, and overall survival. Results: As of January 20, 2012, 127 patients (72.4% male) were evaluable for response. Median age was 59.0 years (range: 23–85 years). ORR was 7.9% (95% CI 3.8–14.0%; partial response [PR]=7.9%; stable disease [SD]=65.4%; PD=18.9%), and 71.3% of patients showed tumor shrinkage. Median duration of PR was 11.1 months (95% CI ≥7.5 months). Median duration of SD was 12.7 months (95% CI ≥7.4 months). Median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI 5.4–9.1 months). Median OS was not yet reached. Most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events (all grades/Grade ≥3) were hypertension (22.4%/10.2%), asthenia (11.0%/3.1%), fatigue (11.0%/3.9%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (11.0%/1.6%), and diarrhea (10.2%/1.6%). Conclusions: Tivozanib has anti-tumor activity after PD on sorafenib. The adverse-event profile of tivozanib after sorafenib is similar to that observed in TIVO-1. Clinical trial information: NCT01076010.

18-month efficacy and safety update from JAVELIN Merkel 200 part A: A phase II study of avelumab in metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma progressed on chemotherapy.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 192-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra P. D'Angelo ◽  
Jeffery Scott Russell ◽  
Shailender Bhatia ◽  
Omid Hamid ◽  
Janice M. Mehnert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Merkel Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Merkel Cell ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

192 Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer. Avelumab, a human anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, is FDA and EMA approved for the treatment of metastatic MCC (mMCC). Here, we report efficacy and safety data for avelumab in patients (pts) with mMCC at ≥18-mo of follow-up. Methods: Pts with mMCC and progression on prior chemotherapy received avelumab 10 mg/kg IV Q2W. Objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by independent review committee (RECIST v1.1) with tumor assessment every 6 wks; overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs; NCI CTCAE v4.0) were also evaluated. Results: As of Mar 24, 2017, 88 pts were treated and followed for a median of 23.0 mo (range 18.7–32.0). Median treatment duration was 17 wks (range 2–132; mean 35 wks ±37). Treatment was ongoing in 15 pts (17%); 7 pts (8%) voluntarily discontinued with continuing responses (5 complete responses [CR] and 2 partial responses). Other reasons for discontinuation were disease progression (n = 42; 48%), death (n = 10; 11%), AE (n = 8; 9%), or consent withdrawal/other (n = 6; 7%). Confirmed ORR of 33% (95% CI 23.3–43.8; CR in 11.4%) remained unchanged from previous analysis and median DOR has not been reached (range 2.8–24.9 mo; 95% CI 18.0–not estimable). Responses were ongoing in 20/29 pts (69%), including 5 pts with > 2 y of follow-up. PFS curve showed a plateau with identical 12- and 18-mo rates of 29% (95% CI 19–39). Median OS was 12.6 mo (95% CI 7.5-19.0) and the 12- and 18-mo OS rates were 51% (95% CI 40–61) and 40% (95% CI 29–50), respectively. 66 pts (75%) had a treatment-related (TR)AE, most commonly ( > 10%) fatigue (25%), infusion-related reaction (15%; all grade 1/2), nausea (11%), and diarrhea (11%); 8 (9%) had a grade ≥3 TRAE. 17 pts (19%) had an immune-related AE, which was grade ≥3 in 4 pts (4.5%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Updated results demonstrate continued durable antitumor activity of avelumab in pts with mMCC, beyond that expected with cytotoxic chemotherapy. The median OS exceeding 1 y and manageable safety profile of avelumab signify a clinically meaningful benefit in pts with mMCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02155647.

The anti–PD-1 antibody spartalizumab (S) in combination with dabrafenib (D) and trametinib (T) in previously untreated patients (pts) with advanced BRAF V600–mutant melanoma: Updated efficacy and safety from parts 1 and 2 of COMBI-i.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9531-9531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgina V. Long ◽  
Celeste Lebbe ◽  
Victoria Atkinson ◽  
Mario Mandalà ◽  
Paul D. Nathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Antigen Expression ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Grade 3

9531 Background: Checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies have improved outcomes in pts with BRAF V600–mutant advanced melanoma; however, many pts progress and new treatment (tx) strategies are needed. BRAF inhibition increases T-cell infiltration, melanoma antigen expression, and PD-1/PD-L1 expression, which may lead to synergistic activity with anti–PD-1 therapy. Methods: COMBI-i is investigating first-line S 400 mg Q4W + D 150 mg BID + T 2 mg QD in pts with unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600–mutant melanoma (NCT02967692). Here we report pooled efficacy and safety data from parts 1 (run-in cohort) and 2 (biomarker cohort). Response was assessed per RECIST v1.1. Results: 36 pts were enrolled (part 1: n = 9; part 2: n = 27); 18 (50%) had stage IV M1c and 15 (42%) had elevated LDH levels. At the data cutoff (median follow-up, 15.2 mo), tx was ongoing in 17 pts (47%). The confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by investigator assessment was 75% (n = 27), with 33% complete responses (CRs; n = 12). Medians for duration of response (DOR; 7/27 pts with events), progression-free survival (PFS; 13/36 pts with events), and overall survival (OS; 7/36 pts with events) were not reached. 12-mo DOR rate was 71.4% (95% CI, 49%-85%). 12-mo PFS and OS rates were 65.3% (95% CI, 47%-79%) and 85.9% (95% CI, 69%-94%), respectively. In pts with high baseline LDH: ORR was 67%, with 3 CRs (20%), median PFS was 10.7 mo (events in 10/15 pts [67%]), and median OS was not reached, with events in 6/15 pts (40%). All pts had ≥ 1 AE; 27 (75%) had grade ≥ 3 AEs. 6 pts (17%) had AEs leading to discontinuation of all 3 study drugs. Any-grade AEs in ≥ 40% of pts included pyrexia, chills, fatigue, cough, and arthralgia. Grade ≥ 3 AEs in > 3 pts were neutropenia, pyrexia, and increased lipase. One pt died of cardiac arrest that was not considered related to study tx. Conclusions: S+D+T showed promising and durable ORR (75%) with CR in 33% of pts. With > 15 mo of follow-up, median PFS was not reached. The safety profile was manageable reflecting individual toxicities of D, T, and S. The global, placebo-controlled, randomized phase 3 (part 3) of COMBI-i is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02967692.

The anti–PD-1 antibody spartalizumab (S) in combination with dabrafenib (D) and trametinib (T) in previously untreated patients (pts) with advanced BRAF V600–mutant melanoma: Updated efficacy and safety from parts 1 and 2 of COMBI-I.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 57-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgina V. Long ◽  
Celeste Lebbe ◽  
Victoria Atkinson ◽  
Mario Mandalà ◽  
Paul D. Nathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Antigen Expression ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Grade 3

57 Background: Checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies have improved outcomes in pts with BRAF V600–mutant advanced melanoma; however, many pts progress and new treatment (tx) strategies are needed. BRAF inhibition increases T-cell infiltration, melanoma antigen expression, and PD-1/PD-L1 expression, which may lead to synergistic activity with anti–PD-1 therapy. Methods: COMBI-i is investigating first-line S 400 mg Q4W + D 150 mg BID + T 2 mg QD in pts with unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600–mutant melanoma (NCT02967692). Here we report pooled efficacy and safety data from parts 1 (run-in cohort) and 2 (biomarker cohort). Response was assessed per RECIST v1.1. Results: 36 pts were enrolled (part 1: n = 9; part 2: n = 27); 18 (50%) had stage IV M1c and 15 (42%) had elevated LDH levels. At the data cutoff (median follow-up, 15.2 mo), tx was ongoing in 17 pts (47%). The confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by investigator assessment was 75% (n = 27), with 33% complete responses (CRs; n = 12). Medians for duration of response (DOR; 7/27 pts with events), progression-free survival (PFS; 13/36 pts with events), and overall survival (OS; 7/36 pts with events) were not reached. 12-mo DOR rate was 71.4% (95% CI, 49%-85%). 12-mo PFS and OS rates were 65.3% (95% CI, 47%-79%) and 85.9% (95% CI, 69%-94%), respectively. In pts with high baseline LDH: ORR was 67%, with 3 CRs (20%), median PFS was 10.7 mo (events in 10/15 pts [67%]), and median OS was not reached, with events in 6/15 pts (40%). All pts had ≥ 1 AE; 27 (75%) had grade ≥ 3 AEs. 6 pts (17%) had AEs leading to discontinuation of all 3 study drugs. Any-grade AEs in ≥ 40% of pts included pyrexia, chills, fatigue, cough, and arthralgia. Grade ≥ 3 AEs in > 3 pts were neutropenia, pyrexia, and increased lipase. One pt died of cardiac arrest that was not considered related to study tx. Conclusions: S+D+T showed promising and durable ORR (75%) with CR in 33% of pts. With > 15 mo of follow-up, median PFS was not reached. The safety profile was manageable reflecting individual toxicities of D, T, and S. The global, placebo-controlled, randomized phase 3 (part 3) of COMBI-i is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02967692.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document