Progression-Free Survival Ratio As End Point for Phase II Trials in Advanced Solid Tumors

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15) ◽  
pp. e451-e452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Buyse ◽  
Emmanuel Quinaux ◽  
Alain Hendlisz ◽  
Vassilis Golfinopoulos ◽  
Christophe Tournigand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Survival Ratio ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
End Point

Progression-Free Survival Rate As Primary End Point for Phase II Cancer Clinical Trials: Application to Mesothelioma—The EORTC Lung Cancer Group

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (19) ◽  
pp. 3007-3012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Francart ◽  
Catherine Legrand ◽  
Richard Sylvester ◽  
Martine Van Glabbeke ◽  
Jan P. van Meerbeeck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
End Point

Purpose Phase II cancer clinical trials play a key role in the development of new drugs. These trials should be designed to accurately determine if the drug should be abandoned or if it is sufficiently promising for further investigation in phase III trials. With new cytostatic agents or when the response assessment is difficult, using the progression-free survival rate (PFSR) at a fixed time point, such as 3, 4, 5, or 6 months, instead of the response rate (RR) as the primary end point is an alternative approach. To design future phase II trials, reference values for PFSRs that correspond to drugs with insufficient (P0) and sufficient (P1) clinical activity (CA) are necessary. This article provides these values in mesothelioma. Materials and Methods The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer database registered ten closed mesothelioma trials (nine phase II trials and one phase III trial) with 523 total patients. Trials were grouped into three categories according to the published RR: significant (n = 259), moderate (n = 142), and insufficient (n = 122) CA. Results The PFSRs at 3, 4, 5, and 6 months, respectively, were as follows: 72%, 67%, 51%, and 43% in the group with significant CA; 59%, 51%, 42%, and 35% with moderate CA; and 52%, 40%, 34%, and 28% with insufficient CA. Conclusion These values may be used to define relevant P0 and P1 values in future phase II mesothelioma trials that use PFSR as the primary end point.

scholarly journals Phase II Study of Lenvatinib in Patients With Progressive, Recurrent or Metastatic Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (18) ◽  
pp. 1529-1537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vatche Tchekmedyian ◽  
Eric J. Sherman ◽  
Lara Dunn ◽  
Crystal Tran ◽  
Shrujal Baxi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
End Point ◽  
Adenoid Cystic

PURPOSE Recurrent or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma (R/M ACC) is a malignant neoplasm of predominantly salivary gland origin for which effective therapies are lacking. We conducted a phase II trial evaluating the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor lenvatinib in patients with R/M ACC. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study was conducted with a two-stage minimax design. Patients with histologically confirmed R/M ACC of any primary site with radiographic and/or symptomatic progression were eligible. Any prior therapy was allowed except previous lenvatinib. Patients received lenvatinib 24 mg orally per day. The primary end point was overall response rate. Secondary end points were progression-free survival and safety. An exploratory analysis of how MYB expression and genomic alterations relate to outcomes was conducted. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were enrolled; 32 were evaluable for the primary end point. Five patients (15.6%) had a confirmed partial response, 24 patients (75%) had stable disease, two patients (6.3%) discontinued treatment as a result of toxicity before the first scan, and one patient (3.1%) had progression of disease as best response. Median progression-free survival time was 17.5 months (95% CI, 7.2 months to not reached), although only eight progression events were observed. Patients otherwise were removed for toxicity (n = 5), as a result of withdrawal of consent (n = 9), or at the treating physician’s discretion (n = 6). Twenty-three patients required at least one dose modification, and 18 of 32 patients discontinued lenvatinib for drug-related issues. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypertension (n = 9; 28.1%) and oral pain (n = 3; 9.4%). Three grade 4 adverse events were observed (myocardial infarction, n = 1; posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, n = 1; and intracranial hemorrhage, n = 1). CONCLUSION This trial met the prespecified overall response rate primary end point, demonstrating antitumor activity with lenvatinib in R/M ACC patients. Toxicity was comparable to previous studies, requiring monitoring and management.

Regorafenib in patients with refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer: a Phase II study (RESOUND)

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (35) ◽  
pp. 4009-4017
Author(s):  
Silvia Bozzarelli ◽  
Lorenza Rimassa ◽  
Laura Giordano ◽  
Simona Sala ◽  
Maria Chiara Tronconi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
End Point ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

Aim: Regorafenib may be active in different cancer types. This Phase II trial included patients with various refractory cancer types treated with regorafenib. Here, we report the results of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma cohort. Methods: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 8 weeks; further investigation of regorafenib would be warranted with a PFS rate ≥50%. Results: A total of 20 patients were enrolled. The best response was stable disease in four patients (20%). The 8-week PFS rate was 25% with a median PFS of 1.7 months (95% CI: 1.5–2.0). A total of 13 patients (65%) experienced grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events. Conclusion: The study did not meet its primary end point. Further investigation of regorafenib monotherapy in this setting is not recommended. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02307500

Four Years of Follow-Up of 1027 Patients with Late Chronic Phase (L-CP), Accelerated Phase (AP), or Blast Crisis (BC) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Treated with Imatinib in Three Large Phase II Trials.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 23-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard T. Silver ◽  
Moshe Talpaz ◽  
Charles L. Sawyers ◽  
Brian J. Druker ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Large Phase

Abstract Background This report updates the results of 3 large phase II studies of the orally available BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib for patients (pts) in AP, BC and late chronic phase (L-CP) CML failing prior interferon therapy (Kantarjan et al, ASH 2003; Talpaz et al, ASH 2003). Methods Between August 1999 and June 2000, 1027 pts were enrolled in phase II trials for CML in L-CP (n=532), AP (n=235) or BC (n=260). Pts in L-CP were treated with 400 mg/day and pts in AP or BC with either 400 or 600 mg/day. Dose escalation up to 800 mg/d was allowed in the late-chronic phase study. Pts with a confirmed diagnosis of AP (n=181), BC (n=229) and late-chronic phase (n=454) were evaluated for efficacy. All pts were evaluated for safety. The median time from initial diagnosis to study entry was 32 months for L-CP pts. Results As of 31-Jul-03, 5% patients with BC, 25% of CML-AP and 64% of L-CP patients still remain on treatment. At the recommended dose of 600 mg, an estimated 40% (AP) and 7% (BC) of patients remained progression-free at 36 months, and an estimated 55% (AP) and 14% (BC) patients were alive at 36 months after initiation of imatinib. The 3-year survival rates for pts with AP with a major cytogenetic response at 3 months were 85% vs. 52% for pts with no response (p<0.001). In L-CP patients with a median follow-up of 40 months, 65% of patients achieved a major cytogenetic response, which was complete in 52%. The cytogenetic responses were durable with an estimated 82% of the pts in continuos major cytogenetic response at 3 years. The estimated rates of progression-free survival and overall survival at 3 years were 80% and 88%. Pts with at least a minor cytogenetic response at 6 months ≤65% Ph+ cells) had an estimated 3-year survival rate of 96% vs. 86% for pts with a ( minimal response and 81% for pts with no cytogenetic response (p<0.001). Conclusion In large phase II studies, continuous imatinib treatment is safe and has improved progression-free survival of patients at all stages of CML. Responses to imatinib are durable and are predictive of long-term outcomes. These results will be further updated at the meeting using a data base lock planned for 20-Sept-04 (using data collected up to 31-July-04, i.e. more than 4 years after the last pts enrollment).

Safety and Activity of Varlilumab, a Novel and First-in-Class Agonist Anti-CD27 Antibody, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (18) ◽  
pp. 2028-2036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard A. Burris ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Stephen M. Ansell ◽  
John J. Nemunaitis ◽  
Geoffrey R. Weiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Costimulatory Molecule ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

Purpose CD27, a costimulatory molecule on T cells, induces intracellular signals that mediate cellular activation, proliferation, effector function, and cell survival upon binding to its ligand, CD70. Varlilumab is a novel, first-in-class, agonist CD27 antibody that stimulates the CD27 pathway, which results in T-cell activation and antitumor activity in tumor models. This first-in-human, dose-escalation and expansion study evaluated the safety, pharmacology, and activity of varlilumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods In a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design (n = 25), patients received a single dose of varlilumab (0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, or 10 mg/kg intravenously) with a 28-day observation, followed by up to five multidose cycles (one dose per week for 4 weeks), depending on tumor response. Expansion cohorts were initiated at 3.0 mg/kg in patients with melanoma (n = 16) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC; n = 15). Primary objectives were to assess the safety and the maximum tolerated and optimal biologic doses of varlilumab. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical antitumor activity of varlilumab. Results Exposure to varlilumab was linear and dose proportional across dose groups. Only one patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity—grade 3 transient asymptomatic hyponatremia at the 1.0-mg/kg dose level. Treatment-related adverse events were generally grade 1 or 2 in severity. Evidence of biologic activity consistent with CD27 stimulation—chemokine induction, T-cell stimulation, regulatory T cell depletion—was observed at all dose levels. A patient with metastatic RCC experienced a partial response (78% shrinkage, progression-free survival > 2.3 years). Eight patients experienced stable disease > 3 months, including a patient with metastatic RCC with progression-free survival of > 3.9 years. Conclusion Dose escalation of varlilumab to 10 mg/kg was well tolerated without identification of a maximum tolerated dose. Varlilumab was biologically and clinically active.

Combination of a MEK inhibitor, pimasertib (MSC1936369B), and a PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, SAR245409, in patients with advanced solid tumors: Results of a phase Ib dose-escalation trial.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2530-2530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Suk Heist ◽  
Leena Gandhi ◽  
Geoffrey Shapiro ◽  
Naiyer A. Rizvi ◽  
Howard A. Burris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Skin Rash ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Mtor Inhibitor ◽  
Mapk Signaling ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Phase Ib

2530 Background: PI3K/mTOR and MAPK signaling pathways are often deregulated in tumors. Simultaneous inhibition of these pathways with the MEK1/2 inhibitor, pimasertib, plus the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, SAR245409, (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01390818) was investigated. Methods: This was a phase Ib, modified 3+3, dose-escalation trial in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Pts received pimasertib and SAR245409 at the following dose levels (DLs): DL1, 15/30; DL2a, 30/30; DL2b, 15/50; DL3, 30/50; DL4a, 60/50; DL4b, 30/70; DL5, 60/70; DL6a, 90/70; DL6b 60/90 and DL7, 90/90 mg (once-daily, qd). After the qd maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was established, twice-daily (bid) dosing was tested: DL1a, 60/30; DL1b, 45/50 and DL2 60/50 mg bid. A recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was determined. Enrollment continued at the RP2D in four expansion cohorts (18 pts each): dual KRAS/PIK3CA mutated (mt) colorectal cancer (CRC), triple-negative breast cancer, KRAS mt non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and BRAFmt melanoma. Results: 53 pts were treated qd and 7 pts bid. The most common tumors were CRC (n=16), NSCLC (n=8), ovarian and pancreatic (n=7, each). At DL6b 2/3 pts had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; both grade [Gr] 3 nausea/vomiting). DL6a was confirmed as the MTD for the qd schedule. At bid DL1a 2/4 pts (both Gr 3 skin rash) and at DL1b 2/3 pts (Gr 3 skin rash and Gr 3 asthenia) had DLTs. DL5 was the RP2D based on tolerability after prolonged exposure. The most common adverse events in qd schedule were: rash (62%, 13% Gr 3), diarrhea (56%, 4% Gr 3), fatigue (51%, 2% Gr 3), nausea (49%, 2% Gr 3), vomiting (45%, 2% Gr 3), peripheral edema and pyrexia (34%, each) and visual impairment with underlying serous retinal detachment (21%). Preliminary pharmacokinetic results suggest no drug-drug interaction. There were 4 partial responses: KRAS mt CRC (n=1) and low-grade ovarian cancer (n=3, 1 KRAS mt/PIK3CA mt and 2 wild-type). Enrollment in expansion cohorts at DL5 is ongoing. Conclusions: Continuousqd dosing of pimasertib and SAR245409 is tolerated and has shown signs of activity. Phase II trials are being planned. Clinical trial information: NCT01390818.

Surveillance or metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence (STOMP): Five-year results of a randomized phase II trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piet Ost ◽  
Dries Reynders ◽  
Karel Decaestecker ◽  
Valerie Fonteyne ◽  
Nicolaas Lumen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference

10 Background: Multiple randomized phase II trials suggest that metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) for oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) improves progression-free survival, but the majority of trials lack longer follow-up. We present the updated 5-year results from the STOMP-trial. Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, phase II study, asymptomatic PCa patients were eligible in case of a biochemical recurrence following primary PCa treatment with curative intent and presenting with up to 3 extracranial on choline PET-CT and a serum testosterone levels > 50 ng/ml. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either surveillance or MDT of all detected lesions. Randomisation was balanced dynamically on two factors: PSA doubling time (≤3 vs. > 3 months) and nodal vs non-nodal metastases. The primary endpoint was androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival. Castrate resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CRPC) was a secondary endpoint. Tests were performed two-sided; p values less than 0.20 were deemed significant. Results: The 5-year ADT-free survival was 8% for the surveillance group and 34% for the MDT group (Figure 1, hazard ratio 0.57 [80% CI: 0.38-0.84], log-rank p = 0.06). There was no significant difference in effect for the different stratification factors (interaction test). The 5-year CRPC-free survival was 53% for the surveillance group and 76% for the MDT group (hazard ratio 0.62 [80% CI: 0.35−1.09]; log−rank p = 0.27). At a median follow for survival of 5.3 years (IQR 4.3-6.3), the 5-year overall survival was 85%, with 6 out of 14 deaths attributed to prostate cancer. Conclusions: The updated STOMP trial outcomes confirm the earlier reported significant difference in ADT free survival in favor of the MDT group compared to surveillance. Prostate-cancer related mortality is low within the first 5 years of diagnosis of oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01558427.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document