Everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who are intolerant of or have progressed after prior vascular endothelial growth factor receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFr-TKI) therapy: An international expanded access program (EAP).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 314-314
Author(s):  
V. Grunwald ◽  
I. Bodrogi ◽  
K. Miller ◽  
J. H. Machiels ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anticancer Agents ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Marketing Approval ◽  
Good Tolerability ◽  
Medical Need ◽  
Grade 3

314 Background: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus is the first agent to show efficacy in a randomized, controlled phase III trial in patients with mRCC after progression on VEGFr-TKIs (RECORD-1). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly improved (4.9 vs 1.9 months) and the risk of disease progression was reduced by 67% with everolimus compared with placebo. To fulfill an unmet medical need, everolimus was offered globally in this EAP. Presented here are preliminary results on 605 patients. Methods: The program began in July 2008 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00655252 ; EudraCT: 2007-005460-28), and since then over 1,000 patients in 34 countries have been enrolled. Patients with clear cell and non–clear cell mRCC who failed or became intolerant of VEGFr-TKIs received daily oral doses of everolimus with investigator assessment every 3 months. Results: Data were collected for 605 patients who had discontinued treatment as of January 15, 2010. Evaluable patients had a mean age of 63 years, and most (94%) had progressed after prior VEGFr-TKI therapy. The adverse event (AE) profile did not differ significantly from that reported in the RECORD-1 trial. Most frequently reported grade 3–4 AEs were anemia (6.1%), stomatitis (4.6%), fatigue (4.6%), hyperglycemia (4.0%), and infection (3.6%). Grade 3–4 noninfectious pneumonitis was reported in 2.8%. Best overall response was stable disease, which was evident in 42% of patients. Conclusions: The EAP has allowed patients with mRCC access to everolimus before marketing approval. The rapid enrollment rate of this EAP confirms the unmet medical need after failure of VEGFr-TKIs. Everolimus has shown good tolerability, and no new safety issues have been identified. The investigator-assessed response rate is consistent with that reported in the RECORD-1 trial. The EAP provides an efficient framework for the development of other programs for innovative anticancer agents in patients without satisfactory therapeutic options. [Table: see text]

Activity of tivozanib (AV-951) in patients (Pts) with different histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 327-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Bhargava ◽  
B. Esteves ◽  
M. Al-Adhami ◽  
D. Nosov ◽  
O. N. Lipatov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Histologic Subtype ◽  
Papillary Rcc ◽  
Vegfr Inhibitor ◽  
Histologic Subtypes

327 Background: This phase 2 randomized discontinuation trial evaluated tivozanib, a potent and selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1, -2, and -3 kinase inhibitor. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in all pts was 11.8 mo, and the objective response rate (ORR) was 27%. Methods: Pts received 1.5 mg/d tivozanib (3 wk on, 1 wk off = 1 cycle). A retrospective analysis evaluated efficacy and safety by histologic subtype. Response was evaluated by independent radiology review using standard RECIST criteria. Results: 272 pts were enrolled: 70% were male; median age was 56 y (range, 26–79). 226 (83%) pts had clear cell (CC) RCC; 46 had non–clear cell (NCC) RCC, including 11 with papillary RCC. Of pts with CC RCC, 176 (78%) had undergone nephrectomy; of pts with NCC RCC, 23 (50%) had undergone nephrectomy. Median treatment duration was 8.5 mo (range, 0.03– 23.8) as of the data cutoff. Median PFS was 12.5 mo (range, 9.9–17.7) for pts with CC RCC, not yet reached for pts with papillary RCC, and 5.4 mo (range, 3.7–12.0) for pts with other NCC subtypes. ORR and disease control rate (DCR; ORR + stable disease), respectively, were 29% and 85% for pts with CC RCC, 18% and 100% for pts with papillary RCC, and 17% and 74% for pts with other NCC subtypes. For pts with CC RCC, median PFS, ORR, and DCR, respectively, were 14.8 mo, 32%, and 88% for those who had undergone nephrectomy and 8.9 mo, 18%, and 76% for those who had not. Among pts with NCC RCC, median PFS was 6.6 mo for pts who had undergone nephrectomy and 7.2 mo for pts without nephrectomy; ORR was 17% for both NCC subgroups, with a DCR of 78% for pts who had undergone nephrectomy and 83% for pts who had not. Common drug- related adverse events (AEs) for pts with CC and NCC RCC, respectively, included hypertension (49% and 48%), dysphonia (22% and 22%), asthenia (12% and 13%), and diarrhea (13% and 9%). The most common grade ≥3 drug-related AE was hypertension (CC, 8%; NCC, 4%). Conclusions: Disease control was observed for pts with all RCC histologic subtypes. The rate of AEs was similar among patients with CC and NCC RCC and consistent with that of a selective VEGFR inhibitor with minimal off-target toxicities. Tivozanib is currently being tested in a phase 3 trial in pts with CC RCC. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Pazopanib in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma

2018 ◽  
pp. 90-94
Author(s):  
M. I. Volkova ◽  
A. S. Olshanskaya
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Good Tolerability ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Renal Cancer ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Stem Cell Growth Factor

Pazopanib is an oral multitargeted tyrozine kinase inhibitor that is used in advanced renal cancer in most countries of the world. Pazopanib inhibits tyrosine kinase receptors involved in tumor angiogenesis and proliferation, including VEGF, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and stem cell growth factor receptor c-Kit, which leads to inhibiting angiogenesis, growth and proliferation of tumor cells. In clinical trials, pazopanib demonstrated improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in previously untreated patients and patients treated with cytokines, as well as the absence of worsening PFS versus sunitinib in the first-line therapy of clear cell RCC in the good- and intermediate prognosis groups. In addition, pazopanib demonstrated a better safety profile than sunitinib. The results of use of pazopanib in broad clinical practice are consistent with data from randomized trials that confirms the high efficacy combined with good tolerability of this drug even in patients who do not meet the generally accepted criteria for the inclusion in clinical trials.

scholarly journals Osimertinib Rechallenge With Bevacizumab vs. Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patients With Osimertinib Resistance

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingli Cui ◽  
Yanhui Hu ◽  
Qingan Cui ◽  
Daoyuan Wu ◽  
Yuefeng Mao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Vegf Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Benefits ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Egfr Mutant

At present, treatment options for osimertinib resistance are very limited. Dual inhibition of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) significantly improved the progression-free survival (PFS) of advanced EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). After EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance, EGFR-TKI continuation combined with VEGF inhibitors still had clinical benefits. It is unclear whether the addition of bevacizumab after osimertinib progresses will prolong the duration of the osimertinib benefit. We screened 1289 patients with NSCLC and finally included 96 patients to evaluate osimertinib combined with bevacizumab (osi + bev) versus chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab (che + bev) for patients with acquired resistance to osimertinib. The overall response rate (ORR) for osi + bev and chem + bev was 15.8% (6 of 38) and 20.7% (12 of 58), respectively. The median PFS for osi + bev and che + bev was 7.0 and 4.9 months (HR 0.415 95%CI: 0.252–0.687 p = 0.001). The median OS for osi + bev and che + bev was 12.6 and 7.1 months (HR 0.430 95%CI: 0.266–0.696 p = 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that no brain metastases and osi + bev treatment after osimertinib resistance correlated with longer PFS (p = 0.044, p = 0.001), while the median PFS of osimertinib less than 6 months (p = 0.021) had a detrimental effect on sequent treatment. Only osi + bev treatment was identified as an independent predictor of OS (p = 0.001). The most common adverse events (AEs) of grade ≥3 were hypertension (13.2%) and diarrhea (10.5%) in the osi + bevacizumab group. Neutropenia (24.1%) and thrombocytopenia (19%) were the most common grade ≥3 AEs in the che + bev group. The overall incidence of serious AEs (grade ≥3) was significantly higher in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group. Our study has shown the superiority of osi + bev compared to che + bev after the failure of osimertinib, making it a preferred option for patients with acquired resistance to osimertinib.

A phase III, randomized, controlled study to compare tivozanib with sorafenib in patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 310-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Motzer ◽  
P. Bhargava ◽  
B. Esteves ◽  
M. Al-Adhami ◽  
W. Slichenmyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Vegf Receptor ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Clear Cell Rcc

310 Background: Drugs that block vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway signaling, such as the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib, have become standard treatment for pts with RCC. Tivozanib (AV-951) is a potent, selective small-molecule pan-VEGF receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor, with activity against the VEGFR-1, -2, and -3 kinases at subnanomolar concentrations. Preliminary results from a phase II randomized discontinuation trial of tivozanib (1.5 mg/d; 3 wks on, 1 wk off) in pts with RCC demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 27% and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 11.8 mo by independent radiology review, with a favorable safety profile. Patients with clear cell RCC who had undergone nephrectomy had an ORR of 32% and median PFS of 14.8 mo (Bhargava, et al. ASCO 2010. Abstract 4599). Based on this antitumor activity a phase III, randomized, controlled, global, multicenter trial is currently in progress to compare tivozanib with sorafenib in pts with advanced RCC. Methods: Approximately 500 adults with clear cell RCC who have undergone nephrectomy and received ≤ 1 prior systemic treatment (no prior VEGF-targeted therapy) were randomized 1:1 to treatment with tivozanib or sorafenib. Pts are receiving 1.5 mg/d tivozanib orally in 4-week cycles (3 wks on, 1 wk off) or continuous 400 mg sorafenib orally twice daily. The primary endpoint will be PFS by independent radiology review; secondary endpoints will include overall survival, ORR, and duration of response. Safety is being monitored through adverse event reporting and laboratory analyses; toxicities are graded using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. The effect of therapy on health-related quality of life will be compared between arms using kidney cancer-specific (FKSI-DRS), oncology (FACT-G), and general (EQ-5D) assessments. Pharmacokinetics and biomarker analyses will be performed. Results: Pending. Conclusions: Enrollment completed in August 2010. An ongoing extension study will allow access to tivozanib for pts who demonstrate progressive disease on sorafenib, as well as long-term treatment with tivozanib or sorafenib for pts who demonstrate clinical benefit. [Table: see text]

Everolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Subgroup analysis of patients (pts) with one versus two prior vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) therapies enrolled in the phase III RECORD-1 study.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 304-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Figlin ◽  
E. Calvo ◽  
R. J. Motzer ◽  
T. E. Hutson ◽  
S. Oudard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Risk Of Disease ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

304 Background: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus is the only medication to have shown efficacy in a randomized, controlled, phase III clinical trial (RECORD-1) in pts with mRCC after progression on VEGFR-TKIs. Everolimus more than doubled progression-free survival (PFS) vs. placebo (4.9 vs 1.9 months) and reduced the risk of disease progression by 67%. This analysis evaluated the effect of everolimus on survival in pts who had received 1 vs 2 prior VEGFR-TKIs. Methods: Pts with mRCC who progressed on sunitinib (SU) and/or sorafenib (SOR) were randomized (2:1) to receive everolimus 10 mg/day (n = 277) or placebo (n = 139) plus best supportive care in the double- blind, phase III RECORD-1 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00410124 ). Results: Before enrollment, the majority of pts received only 1 VEGFR- TKI (317 pts, 74%), with 317 pts receiving either SU or SOR (everolimus = 211; placebo = 106) and 99 pts receiving both SU and SOR (everolimus = 66; placebo = 33). Median PFS was 5.42 mo (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.30, 5.82) in pts receiving everolimus who had received 1 prior VEGFR-TKI and 1.87 mo (95% CI: 1.84, 2.14) in those receiving placebo (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.42; p < .001). Median PFS was 3.78 mo (95% CI: 3.25, 5.13) for the everolimus group in pts who received 2 prior VEGFR-TKIs, versus 1.87 mo (95% CI: 1.77, 3.06) for the placebo group (HR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.22, 0.63; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Pts in all stratified subgroups derived significant clinical benefit from everolimus treatment, including pts previously treated with either 1 or 2 VEGFR-TKIs. However, there was a trend toward a longer PFS in pts treated with 1 prior VEGFR-TKI compared with 2 VEGFR-TKIs. [Table: see text]

Lapatinib in combination with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOx) in HER2-positive advanced or metastatic gastric, esophageal, or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (AC): The TRIO-013/LOGiC Trial.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4001-LBA4001 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Randolph Hecht ◽  
Yung-Jue Bang ◽  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Hyun-Chul Chung ◽  
Jian-Ming Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Grade 3

LBA4001 Background: HER2 amplification is common in upper GI tract (UGIT) adenocarcinomas and inhibition improves clinical outcomes. Lapatinib ditosylate (L), a dual anti EGFR and anti HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor with preclinical activity against these cancers, was investigated in a phase III, randomized, double blind trial evaluating efficacy and safety in combination with CapeOx as first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic HER2+ UGIT ACs. Methods: Subjects had measurable and/or non-measurable disease with overexpression or amplification of HER2 (IHC2+ and FISH amplified, or IHC 3+, or FISH, CISH, or SISH amplified). HER2 status was reviewed by the central lab. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to CapeOx q3w (oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 day 1; capecitabine 850mg/m2/BID days 1 – 14), and daily L (1250mg) (CapeOx+L) or placebo (CapeOx+P). The primary efficacy population (PEP) comprised all subjects whose tumors were centrally confirmed to be FISH amplified. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) of the PEP. Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: 545 pts were randomized and 487 had HER2+ centrally confirmed. The primary endpoint was not reached with a hazard ratio (HR) for OS of CapeOx+L compared to CapeOx+P of 0.91 (95% CI 0.73, 1.12, p=0.35); median 12.2 vs. 10.5 months, respectively. HR for uncensored PFS was 0.86 (95% CI 0.71 - 1.04, p=0.10); median 6.0 vs. 5.4 months. The analysis of PFS censored by the time of subsequent anticancer therapy as per protocol showed a HR of 0.82 (95% CI 0.68, 1.00, p=0.04). ORR was 53% in the CapeOx+L arm and 40% in the CapeOx+P arm. Pre-specified subgroup analyses showed significant improvements in OS in Asian pts (HR= 0.68) and those under 60 years (HR=0.69). There was no association between IHC and OS. Toxicity profiles were similar except for increased overall diarrhea, and skin toxicity and grade 3+ diarrhea (12 vs 3%) with CapeOx+L. Conclusions: The addition of L to CapeOx did not reach its primary endpoint, though certain subgroups showed improvement. Further clinical and molecular analyses will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT00680901.

Anlotinib in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase II trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 95-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Huang ◽  
Juxiang Xiao ◽  
Wentao Fang ◽  
Ping Lu ◽  
Qingxia Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Vegfr Inhibitor ◽  
Loss Of Appetite

95 Background: The treatment option for ESCC patients (pts) progressing after chemotherapy is still uncertain. Anlotinib is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor involved in tumor angiogenesis and growth, such as vascular endothelia growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 2/3, etc. Methods: Eligible pts were advanced ESCC who had progressed after platinum or taxane containing chemotherapy. Between January 6, 2016 and May 22, 2018, a total of 165 pts from 13 centers in China were randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) to anlotinib arm (n=110), and placebo arm (n=55). Pts were given anlotinib (12 mg/day) or placebo orally from day 1 to day 14 in a 21-day cycle until disease progression or had unacceptable toxic effects. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Median PFS was 3.0 months with anlotinib and 1.4 months with placebo (HR 0.5, 95% CI, 0.3-0.7; P<0.0001). Complete response occured in 2 pts with anlotinib and 0 pt with placebo. The objective response rates were 7% in the anlotinib group and 4% in the placebo group (P=0.498), and the disease control rates (DCR) were 64% and 18%, respectively (P<0.0001). In anlotinib arm, median duration of response was 5.8 months (range, 3.1-19.7+). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were reported in 36.7% and 11.0% of the two group pts, and grade 5 TRAE were 2.8% and 0%, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 TRAE (>5%) in anlotinib arm were hypertension (15.6%) and loss of appetite (5.5%). Median overall survival were similar between the groups (6.1 months vs 7.2 months; HR 1.2, 95%CI 0.8-1.8, P=0.4261). The ratio of pts received post study treatments was 41.2% (40/97) in anlotinib arm and 72.7% (40/55) in placebo arm (P=0.0002), including chemotherapy (23.7% vs 54.6%), PD-1 inhibitors (4.1% vs 11.0%), and Apatinib, a VEGFR inhibitor, (10.3% vs 20.0%), etc. Conclusions: In pretreated advanced ESCC pts, anlotinib significantly improved PFS and DCR compared with placebo, with a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT02649361.

SAVOIR: A phase III study of savolitinib versus sunitinib in pts with MET-driven papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5002-5002
Author(s):  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Daniel Yick Chin Heng ◽  
Jae-Lyun Lee ◽  
Mathilde Cancel ◽  
Remy B Verheijen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Chromosome 7 ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Modifications

5002 Background: PRCC is the most common type of non-clear cell RCC, accounting for 10–15% of renal malignancies. As a subset of PRCC cases are MET-driven, MET inhibition may be an appropriate targeted treatment approach. In a single-arm Phase II study, savolitinib (AZD6094, HMPL‐504, volitinib), a highly selective MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrated antitumor activity in pts with MET-driven PRCC (Choueiri et al. JCO 2017). The Phase III SAVOIR study (NCT03091192) further assessed savolitinib vs standard of care sunitinib in pts with MET-driven PRCC. Methods: In this open-label (sponsor blinded), randomized study, pts with centrally confirmed MET-driven ( MET and/or HGF amplification, chromosome 7 gain and/or MET kinase domain mutations), metastatic PRCC were randomized to savolitinib 600 mg once daily (QD), or sunitinib 50 mg QD 4 weeks on / 2 weeks off. Primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review). Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety and tolerability. Results: After external data on predicted PFS with sunitinib in pts with MET-driven disease became available, study enrollment was closed. At data cutoff (Aug 2019), only 60 of the planned 180 pts were randomized (savolitinib n = 33; sunitinib n = 27). Most had chromosome 7 gain (savolitinib 91%; sunitinib 96%) and no prior therapy (savolitinib 85%; sunitinib 93%). PFS, OS, and ORR were numerically improved with savolitinib vs sunitinib (Table). CTCAE grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 42% and 81% of pts; dose modifications were related to AEs in 30% and 74% of pts with savolitinib and sunitinib respectively. After discontinuation, 36% of all savolitinib and 19% of all sunitinib pts received subsequent anticancer therapy. Conclusions: Although pt numbers and follow-up were limited, savolitinib demonstrated encouraging efficacy and an improved safety profile vs sunitinib, with fewer grade ≥3 AEs and fewer dose modifications required. Sunitinib performance was poorer than expected based on external retrospective data. Further investigation of savolitinib as a treatment option for MET-driven PRCC is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03091192 . [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Camrelizumab Plus Apatinib in Patients With Advanced Cervical Cancer (CLAP): A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (34) ◽  
pp. 4095-4106
Author(s):  
Chunyan Lan ◽  
Jingxian Shen ◽  
Yin Wang ◽  
Jundong Li ◽  
Zhimin Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Camrelizumab is an antibody against programmed death protein 1. We assessed the activity and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, in patients with advanced cervical cancer. METHODS This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study enrolled patients with advanced cervical cancer who progressed after at least one line of systemic therapy. Patients received camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks and apatinib 250 mg once per day. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by investigators per RECIST version 1.1. Key secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response, and safety. RESULTS Forty-five patients were enrolled and received treatment. Median age was 51.0 years (range, 33-67 years), and 57.8% of patients had previously received two or more lines of chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic disease. Ten patients (22.2%) had received bevacizumab. Median follow-up was 11.3 months (range, 1.0-15.5 months). ORR was 55.6% (95% CI, 40.0% to 70.4%), with two complete and 23 partial responses. Median PFS was 8.8 months (95% CI, 5.6 months to not estimable). Median duration of response and median OS were not reached. Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 71.1% of patients, and the most common AEs were hypertension (24.4%), anemia (20.0%), and fatigue (15.6%). The most common potential immune-related AEs included grade 1-2 hypothyroidism (22.2%) and reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (8.9%). CONCLUSION Camrelizumab plus apatinib had promising antitumor activity and manageable toxicities in patients with advanced cervical cancer. Larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate our findings.

scholarly journals Apatinib Plus Temozolomide: An Effective Salvage Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingjing Ge ◽  
Cheng Li ◽  
Fengjun Xue ◽  
Shaopei Qi ◽  
Zhimeng Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Symptomatic Treatment ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Salvage Regimen ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

BackgroundTreatment for recurrent glioblastoma is poor, and there is a need for better therapies. Here we retrospectively assessed the efficacy and toxicity of temozolomide plus apatinib, an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 in recurrent glioblastoma.Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients with recurrent glioblastoma who underwent apatinib plus temozolomide treatment was performed. Apatinib was given at 500 mg once daily. Temozolomide was administered at 200 mg/m2/d on days 1–5 or 50 mg/m2/d continuous daily according to whether they had experienced temozolomide maintenance treatment before. The main clinical data collected included tumor characteristics, status of MGMT promoter, and IDH mutation, number of relapse, response, survival, adverse reactions, and salvage therapies.ResultsFrom April 2016 to August 2019, thirty-one patients were identified. The objective response rate was 26.3%, and the disease control rate was 84.2%. The progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months and overall survival (OS) at 12 months were 44.6 and 30.2%. The median PFS and OS were 4.9 and 8.2 months, respectively. Two patients achieved long PFS of 30.9 and 38.7+ months. The median survival time after progression of the patients with or without salvage bevacizumab was 5.1 versus 1.2 months. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were hypertension (5.8%), decreased appetite (5.8%), and thrombocytopenia (4.3%), most of which were resolved after symptomatic treatment or dose reduction.ConclusionApatinib plus temozolomide is an effective salvage regimen with manageable toxicities for recurrent glioblastoma and could not reduce the sensitivity to bevacizumab.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document