Comparative evaluation of capecitabine or infusional leucovorin/5-fluorouracil (LV/5-FU) with or without oxaliplatin (Ox) for stage III colon cancer (CC): A pooled analysis of individual patient data from four randomized controlled trials.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3525-3525
Author(s):  
Weijing Sun ◽  
Hans-Joachim Schmoll ◽  
Michael O'Connell ◽  
Thomas H. Cartwright ◽  
Christopher Twelves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Grade 3

3525 Background: A fluoropyrimidine + Ox is the standard of care for stage III CC but a fluoropyrimidine alone is recommended for selected patients in several practice guidelines. We assessed efficacy and safety of adjuvant capecitabine ± Ox vs. LV/5-FU ± Ox across a population of stage III CC patients enrolled in four trials. Methods: N = 5,819 patients from NSABP C-08, XELOXA, X-ACT, and AVANT were pooled and analyzed; bevacizumab-treated patients were excluded. Endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS, primary), relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Multivariate Cox regression analyses (MVA) controlled for age, gender, T, and N stage. Results: Patient demographics and disease characteristics (except lymph nodes examined) were well balanced across groups. The number of patients receiving capecitabine and LV/5-FU were 1,942 and 3,877, respectively. Median follow-up was shorter in NSABP C-08 and AVANT (36 and 50 months) vs. XELOXA and X-ACT (83 and 74 months). Five-year DFS was 62.8% for capecitabine ± Ox and LV/5-FU ± Ox. The capecitabine by Ox interaction was significant for OS with a trend for DFS and RFS; likely due to improved outcomes with capecitabine alone and similar outcomes for capecitabine or LV/5-FU + Ox. Serious adverse event (AE) rates were similar for LV/5-FU- and capecitabine-based therapy (16% vs. 20%, respectively). Overall, treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs were more common with LV/5-FU (59% vs. 47%). Treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs of interest included peripheral sensory neuropathy (5% vs. < 1%), diarrhea (12% vs. 15%), febrile neutropenia (2% vs. < 1%), and hand–foot syndrome (< 1% vs. 12%). Conclusions: Adjuvant capecitabine ± Ox and LV/5-FU ± Ox show comparableefficacy benefits for the treatment of stage III CC; further supporting capecitabine or LV/5-FU-based regimens as standard options for the adjuvant therapy of stage III CC. [Table: see text]

Impact of age and medical comorbidity (MC) on adjuvant treatment outcomes for stage III colon cancer (CC): A pooled analysis of individual patient data from four randomized controlled trials.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3522-3522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel G. Haller ◽  
Michael O'Connell ◽  
Thomas H. Cartwright ◽  
Christopher Twelves ◽  
Edward McKenna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

3522 Background: Studies show significantly improved disease-free and overall survival (DFS, OS) for oxaliplatin (Ox)-based vs. leucovorin/5-fluorouracil (LV/5-FU) adjuvant therapy in CC, with conflicting reports of Ox benefit in patients > 70 years old. The impact of MC on Ox benefit has not been assessed. We assessed the impact of age and MC on adjuvant treatment outcomes for stage III CC. Methods: N = 4,819 patients from NSABP C-08, XELOXA, X-ACT, and AVANT were analyzed by Ox therapy (XELOX/FOLFOX) vs. LV/5-FU, MC, and age; patients treated with bevacizumab were excluded. Endpoints were DFS (primary), OS, and safety. MC was assessed (except NSABP C-08) by adapted Charlson Comorbidity and NCI Combined Indices (CCI, NCI): Low (≤ 1) vs. high (> 1). Hazardratios (HR) were estimated by Cox regression analyses. Multivariate Cox regression analyses (MVA) tested for independent effects of age and MC on Ox benefit, controlling for gender, T, and N stage. Results: Patient demographics, MC, and disease characteristics (except lymph nodes examined) were well balanced across groups. Median follow-up was shorter in NSABP C-08 and AVANT (36 and 50 months) vs. XELOXA and X-ACT (83 and 74 months). MVA-confirmed DFS/OS benefit was consistently shown for XELOX/FOLFOX vs. LV/5-FU, regardless of age or MC. Grade 3/4 serious adverse event (AE) rates were comparable across cohorts and CCI scores, and higher in patients aged ≥ 70. Grade 3/4 AEs of interest, including peripheral sensory neuropathy, were comparable across ages and CCI scores, and higher with XELOX/FOLFOX. Conclusions: Ox benefit is modestly attenuated in patients aged ≥ 70; however, significant benefit is observed regardless of age or MC in this analysis. Our results further support XELOX or FOLFOX as standard options for the adjuvant management of stage III CC in all age groups. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals 300 Final analysis of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial of tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell vaccine in stage III/IV melanoma: 36-month analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A327-A327
Author(s):  
Lexy Adams ◽  
Robert Chick ◽  
Guy Clifton ◽  
Timothy Vreeland ◽  
Patrick McCarthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Tumor Lysate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Resected Stage ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Stage Iv Melanoma

BackgroundThe tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine is created ex vivo by loading autologous dendritic cells (DC) with yeast cell wall particles (YCWP) containing autologous tumor lysate, thus delivering tumor antigens to the DC cytoplasm via phagocytosis. TLPLDC then activates a robust T cell response against the unique antigens for each patient. The primary analysis of the prospective, randomized, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial in patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma showed TLPLDC improved 24-month disease-free survival (DFS) in the per-treatment (PT) analysis (patients completing the 6-month primary vaccine series). Here, we examine the secondary endpoint of 36-month DFS and overall survival (OS).MethodsPatients with resected stage III/IV melanoma were randomized 2:1 to TLPLDC vaccine or placebo (autologous DC loaded with empty YCWP). Treatments were given at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12 and 18 months. The protocol was amended to include patients receiving concurrent checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) to follow changes in standard of care. The co-primary endpoints were 24-month DFS by intention-to-treat (IT) analysis and per-treatment (PT) analysis, with secondary endpoints including 36-month DFS and OS by ITT and PT analysis, pre-specified analysis by stage, and safety as measured by CTCAE v4.03.ResultsOverall, 103 patients received TLPLDC and 41 placebo. In PT analysis, 65 patients received TLPLDC and 32 placebo. Total adverse events (AEs), grade 3+ AEs, and serious AEs (SAEs) were similar in placebo vs TLPLDC groups, with one related SAE per treatment arm. By ITT analysis, 36-month OS was 76.2% for TLPLDC vs 70.3% for placebo (HR 0.72, p=0.437) and 36-month DFS was 35.6% vs 27.1% (HR 0.95, p=0.841). By PT analysis, 36-month DFS was improved with TLPLDC (57.5% vs 35.0%; HR 0.50, p=0.025, figure 1). This effect was even more dramatic in resected stage IV patients (36-month DFS: 60.9% vs 0%; HR 0.12, p=0.001, figure 2).ConclusionsThis phase IIb trial again demonstrates the safety of the TLPLDC vaccine, and an improved 36-month DFS in patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma who complete the primary vaccine series, particularly in the stage IV subgroup. Next, a phase III trial will evaluate the efficacy of TLPLDC vaccine as adjuvant treatment for resected stage IV melanoma, with patients randomized to receive standard of care PD-1 inhibitors + TLPLDC versus PD-1 inhibitors + placebo.Abstract 300 Figure 136-month disease free survival for patients receiving TLPLDC vs placebo by PT analysisAbstract 300 Figure 236-month disease free survival for subset of stage IV melanoma patients receiving TLPLDC vs placebo by PT analysisTrial RegistrationThis is a phase IIb clinical trial registered under NCT02301611Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by Western IRB, protocol 20141932.

Prospective pooled analysis of six phase III trials investigating duration of adjuvant (adjuv) oxaliplatin-based therapy (3 vs 6 months) for patients (pts) with stage III colon cancer (CC): The IDEA (International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant chemotherapy) collaboration.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA1-LBA1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Shi ◽  
Alberto F. Sobrero ◽  
Anthony Frank Shields ◽  
Takayuki Yoshino ◽  
James Paul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Model ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Differential Outcomes ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Stratified Cox Model

LBA1 Background: Since 2004, 6 months (m) of oxaliplatin (oxali)-based treatment has been the standard of care as adjuvant therapy for stage III CC. Since oxali is associated with cumulative neurotoxicity, shorter duration of adjuv therapy could spare pts toxicity and lead to substantial saving in health expenditures. Methods: A prospective, pre-planned pooled analysis of 6 concurrently conducted randomized phase III trials (SCOT, TOSCA, Alliance/SWOG 80702, IDEA France (GERCOR/PRODIGE), ACHIEVE, HORG) was performed to evaluate the non-inferiority (NI) of 3m compared with 6m (ref) of adjuv FOLFOX/XELOX. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), defined as time from enrolment to relapse, 2nd CRC, and death (all causes). NI was to be declared if the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for DFS hazard ratio (HR 3m v 6m) estimated by a stratified Cox model was below 1.12. NI was examined within regimen and stage subgroups as pre-planned. Results: The analysis included 12,834 pts from 12 countries, accrued from 6/07 to 12/15. Stage distribution: 13% T1-2, 66% T3, 21% T4; 28% N2; 40% received XELOX. G3+ neurotoxicity was higher in the 6m v 3m arm (16 v 3% FOLFOX, 9 v 3% XELOX, p<0.0001). With a median follow-up of 39 mos, 3263 DFS events were observed. Overall, the 3 year DFS rate was 74.6% (3m) and 75.5% (6m), with estimated DFS HR of 1.07 (95%CI, 1.00-1.15). The 3m v 6m DFS HRs were 1.16 (95%CI, 1.06-1.26) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.85-1.06) for FOLFOX and XELOX treated pts, respectively. The 3m v 6m DFS HRs were 1.01 (95%CI, 0.90-1.12) in T1-3 N1, and 1.12 (95%CI, 1.03-1.23) for T4 or N2 pts. Conclusions: While NI was not established for the overall cohort, NI of 3m v 6m oxali-based adjuv therapy was supported for XELOX. As each IDEA trial treated varying proportions of pts with XELOX (0 to 75%), the regimen interaction likely produced the differential outcomes observed between individual studies. Certain substages (T1-3 N1) also showed NI for 3m v 6m. These data provide a framework for discussions on risks and benefits of individualized adjuv therapy approaches. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U10CA180888, U10CA180835, INCA, PHRC2009, EME 09/800/34, HTA 14/140/84, CRUK C1348/A15960, JFMC. Clinical trial information: NCT01150045.

Improved Overall Survival With Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin As Adjuvant Treatment in Stage II or III Colon Cancer in the MOSAIC Trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (19) ◽  
pp. 3109-3116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry André ◽  
Corrado Boni ◽  
Matilde Navarro ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Tamas Hickish ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Peripheral Sensory

Purpose Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly improved in patients who had undergone resection with curative intent for stage II or III colon cancer who received bolus plus continuous-infusion fluorouracil plus leucovorin (LV5FU2) with the addition of oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4). Final results of the study, including 6-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year updated DFS, are reported. Patients and Methods A total of 2,246 patients were randomly assigned to receive LV5FU2 or FOLFOX4 for 6 months. The primary end point was DFS. Secondary end points were OS and safety. Results Five-year DFS rates were 73.3% and 67.4% in the FOLFOX4 and LV5FU2 groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.93; P = .003). Six-year OS rates were 78.5% and 76.0% in the FOLFOX4 and LV5FU2 groups, respectively (HR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.00; P = .046); corresponding 6-year OS rates for patients with stage III disease were 72.9% and 68.7%, respectively (HR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97; P = .023). No difference in OS was seen in the stage II population. The incidence of second noncolorectal cancers was 5.5% and 6.1% in the FOLFOX4 and LV5FU2 groups, respectively. Among patients receiving oxaliplatin, the frequency of grade 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy was 1.3% 12 months after treatment and 0.7% at 48 months. Conclusion Adding oxaliplatin to LV5FU2 significantly improved 5-year DFS and 6-year OS in the adjuvant treatment of stage II or III colon cancer and should be considered after surgery for patients with stage III disease.

scholarly journals Oncologic Benefit of Adjuvant Chemoradiation after D2 Gastrectomy: A Stepwise Hierarchical Pooled Analysis and Systematic Review

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2125
Author(s):  
Chai Hong Rim ◽  
In-Soo Shin ◽  
Hye Yoon Lee ◽  
Won Sup Yoon ◽  
Sunmin Park
Keyword(s):  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
D2 Gastrectomy ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Cochrane Library ◽  
Evaluation Of Data

Our study aimed to evaluate the benefits of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) after D2 gastrectomy, as compared to adjuvant chemotherapy, alone. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. We applied stepwise analyses that enabled the evaluation of data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), balanced studies, and all studies separately and in a hierarchical manner. Thirteen controlled studies, including six RCTs involving 2603 patients, were included. Overall pooled analysis revealed a disease-free survival benefit of CRT (odds ratio (OR): 1.264, p = 0.053), which was more evident in the subgroup analysis of RCTs (OR: 1.440, p = 0.006) and balanced studies (OR: 1.417, p < 0.001). Overall survival was insignificantly different in the overall pooled analysis (OR: 1.124, p = 0.347). However, the difference was marginally significant in the subgroup analysis of balanced studies (OR: 1.279, p = 0.055) and significant in the subgroup analysis of studies involving stage ≥III patients only (OR: 1.663, p = 0.005). Locoregional recurrence (LRR) reduction was noted in the overall pooled analysis (OR: 0.559, p = 0.012; pooled rate: 11.3% vs. 18.1%) and was more robust in the subgroup analyses. Grade ≥3 leukopenia was higher in the CRT arm (OR: 1.387, p = 0.004; pooled rate: 26.4% vs. 15.7%). CRT after D2 gastrectomy should be applied for patients with high risk of LRR (e.g., stage ≥ III), along with efforts to reduce leukopenia.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy In Subgroups of Stage III Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An Analysis Based On 10-Year Follow-Up

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Wang ◽  
Wu Zheng ◽  
Wanqin Cheng ◽  
Dehuan Xie ◽  
Feifei Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
N2 Disease

Abstract PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in subgroups of stage III nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the context of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).Methods272 patients with stage III NPC who underwent IMRT with or without concurrent chemotherapy (CCT) were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological features were evaluated by a Cox regression model to identify independent prognostic factors. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 108 months. The 10-year locoregional-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 87.8%, 80.7%, 68.8%, and 74.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the N classification was significantly associated with DMFS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.616, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.387-9.428, P=0.009), DFS (HR 2.417, 95% CI 1.291-4.423, P=0.006), and OS (HR 3.024, 95% CI 1.385-6.602, P=0.005). In patients with T1-3N2 disease, CCRT was associated with improved 10-year LRFS (89.6% vs. 65.4%, P=0.005), DFS (71.9% vs. 39.4%, P=0.001) and OS (80.0% vs. 50.5%, P=0.004) compared with IMRT alone. However, in patients with T3N0-1 disease, no significant survival differences were observed between patients treated with IMRT alone and CCRT (P>0.05). ConclusionCCRT is an effective therapy in stage III NPC, especially for patients with N2 disease but N0-1 disease. Individualized treatment strategies are essential for patients with varying disease risks.

Effect of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy on post-relapse survival (PRS) in patients with stage III colon cancer: A pooled analysis of individual patient data from four randomized controlled trials.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3523-3523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Twelves ◽  
Hans-Joachim Schmoll ◽  
Michael O'Connell ◽  
Thomas H. Cartwright ◽  
Edward McKenna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen ◽  
N Stage

3523 Background: Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy is the standard of care for stage III colon cancer; however, its impact on PRS in these patients is unclear. We therefore compared PRS in trials of patients with stage III colon cancer treated with oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) or 5-flourouracil (5-FU; FOLFOX) vs. leucovorin/5-FU (LV/5-FU). Methods: Individual patientdata (N = 4,819) from NSABP C-08, XELOXA, X-ACT, and AVANT were pooled and analyzed by XELOX/FOLFOX vs. LV/5-FU; patients treated with bevacizumab were excluded. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated by Cox regression analyses and multivariate Cox regression analyses controlled for age, gender, T, and N stage. Post-relapse treatment data were collected when available. Results: Patient demographics and disease characteristics (except lymph nodes examined) were well balanced across analytic groups. Median follow-up was shorter in NSABP C-08 and AVANT (36 and 50 months) than in XELOXA and X-ACT (83 and 74 months). PRS was very similar for XELOX/FOLFOX and LV/5-FU (HR 0.94, 95% CI, 0.82–1.07; P = .33). Multivariate analyses supported these findings, but showed that PRS was associated with younger age and lower N stage at diagnosis after controlling for gender and T stage. PRS was also comparable for capecitabine or XELOX vs. LV/5-FU or FOLFOX (N = 5,819, HR 1.07, 95% CI, 0.95–1.20; P = .26). Post-relapse therapies were comparable across the two cohorts. Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy regimen did not impact on PRS in patients with stage III colon cancer; however, both N stage and age demonstrated independent effects on PRS. Studies have demonstrated significantly improved disease-free and overall survival for oxaliplatin-based therapy, and our data show that survival is not compromised by worsened PRS at subsequent relapse. [Table: see text]

A prospective, multicentric clinical study of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC): A 4-year follow-up report.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16054-e16054
Author(s):  
Fang Wu ◽  
Ren-sheng Wang ◽  
Guosheng Feng ◽  
Guisheng Li ◽  
Meilian Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Regional Recurrence ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
N Stage ◽  
Grade 3

e16054 Background: To evaluate the treatment efficacy, toxicity and prognostic factors of patients with NPC treated with IMRT. Methods: Between January 2006 and August 2008, 300 patients with pathologically diagnosed NPC from 6 medical center received IMRT. The number of patients with stage I, II, III, IVa-b disease (UICC/AJCC 2002 staging system) was 6, 45,141, and 108, respectively. The prescription doses were as follows: 70~74Gy/30 fraction to GTVnx, 68~70Gy/30 fraction to GTVnd, 60~64Gy/30 fraction to CTV1,50~54Gy /30 fraction to CTV2. Patients with stage III, IVa-b disease also received cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Results: The median follow-up time was 47.1 months (range,11-68 months). There were 18,15 and 42 patients who had developed local, regional recurrence and distant metastasis, respectively. There were 45 patients died. 34 patients died of distant metastasis,6 died of local and regional recurrence, 2 died of re-treatment, one died of hemorrhage complications of nasopharynx,one died of second primary tumor, and the other one died of unknown cause.The 4-year rate of local control (LC), regional control(RC), metastasis-free survival(DMFS),disease-free survival(DFS) and overall survival(OS) was 94.0%, 95.5%, 87.4%, 80.8%, 86.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that N stage was the only prognostic factor for OS (x2=3.912, p=0.048, HR=14.565), DMFS (x2=5.195, p=0.023, HR=8.737)and DFS (x2=7.613,p=0.006, HR=7.628), in these patients. Mucositis was the most severe acute toxicity, with 18.1% grade 1, 48.6% grade 2, 33.3% grade 3 . No patient suffered from grade 4 mucositis. Xerostomia was the most common seen late toxicity, with 8% grade 0, 50.5% grade 1, 4.6% grade 2. No grade 3-4 xerostomia was observed. Conclusions: IMRT can improve the treatment efficacy of patients with NPC. The acute and late toxicities were tolerated. Distant metastasis becomes the main treatment failure. N stage is a significant prognostic factors.

A regimen of weekly nab-paclitaxel with weekly carboplatin in recurrent ovarian cancer: A retrospective analysis.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15516-e15516
Author(s):  
Amit Rauthan ◽  
Poonam Patil ◽  
S. P. Somashekhar ◽  
Shabber Zaveri
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Grade 3

e15516 Background: The standard of care for patients with recurrent platinum resistant ovarian cancer is treatment with non cross-resistant drugs. Carboplatin retreatment is usually not an option in the platinum resistant population. Weekly paclitaxel has been tried in recurrent patients. But paclitaxel can cause hypersensitivity reactions due to its Cremophor based solvent. nab-paclitaxel being a nano-particle albumin bound paclitaxel is devoid of this toxictity. Also, it is thought that nab-paclitaxel may have a higher intratumoral uptake leading to enhanced anti-tumor action. We looked at a regimen using weekly carboplatin with weekly nab-paclitaxel in platinum resistantrelapsed carcinoma ovary who had failed multiple lines of treatment. Methods: We treated 10 patients with recurrent platinum resistant ovarian cancer with measurable disease with nab-paclitaxel 100mg/m2 on days 1,8,15 with carboplatin at AUC 1.5 on days 1,8,15 intravenously, repeated every 28 days for 4 cycles. All patients had received 3 or more lines of chemotherapy for recurrent disease. We looked for response rate, progression free survival and toxicities. Results: Three patients had complete response, 5 patients had partial response and 2 patients had disease progression. Median PFS was 6 months. There were no instances of paclitaxel induced hypersensitivity reactions. Two patients developed grade 3 neutropenia. One patient developed grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Three patients required blood transfusions. One patient developed grade 3 neuropathy. Conclusions: Weekly combination of nab-paclitaxel with weekly carboplatin is a safe and potentially active treatment in recurrent platinum resistant ovarian cancers who had failed multiple lines of treatment. Considering the efficacy and favorable toxicity profile, this weekly combination needs to be tested in a larger number of patients.

Effects of Red Ginseng Upon Postoperative Immunity and Survival in Patients with Stage III Gastric Cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (04) ◽  
pp. 483-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Ock Suh ◽  
Matthew Kroh ◽  
Nam Ryeol Kim ◽  
Yong Geul Joh ◽  
Min Young Cho
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Postoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Red Ginseng ◽  
T Lymphocyte Subsets ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
D2 Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Flow Cytometric ◽  
Number Of Patients

In this paper, we present evidence that the red ginseng powder from Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer inhibits the recurrence of AJCC stage III gastric cancer and shows immunomodulatory activities during postoperative chemotherapy, after a curative resection with D2 lymph node dissection. Flow cytometric analyses for peripheral T-lymphocyte subsets showed that the red ginseng powder restored CD4 levels to the initial preoperative values during postoperative chemotherapy. Depression of CD3 during postoperative chemotherapy was also inhibited by the red ginseng powder ingestion. This study demonstrated a five-year disease free survival and overall survival rate that was significantly higher in patients taking the red ginseng powder during postoperative chemotherapy versus control (68.2% versus 33.3%, 76.4% versus 38.5%, respectively, p < 0.05). In spite of the limitation of a small number of patients (n = 42), these findings suggest that red ginseng powder may help to improve postoperative survival in these patients. Additionally, red ginseng powder may have some immunomodulatory properties associated with CD3 and CD4 activity in patients with advanced gastric cancer during postoperative chemotherapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document