Assessment of the Fanconi anemia repair pathway as a predictor of clinical activity of pembrolizumab (PEM).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2555-2555
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel Villalona-Calero ◽  
John Paul Diaz ◽  
Zuanel Diaz ◽  
Wenrui Duan ◽  
Eric Douglas Schroeder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fanconi Anemia ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Phase 2 Trial

2555 Background: Given the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in mismatch repair deficient tumors, we evaluated if homologous recombination repair deficiency associates with solid tumor response to ICI. Methods: We conducted a phase 2 trial (NCT03274661) of PEM in metastatic solid tumor patients progressing on standard of care and for whom PEM had no FDA approved indication. We evaluated a triple stain (FANCD2foci/DAPI/Ki67) immunofluorescence functional assay of the Fanconi Anemia pathway (FATSI) in treated patients’ archived tumors as a correlative biomarker. Patients with microsatellite unstable tumors were not eligible. The primary objective was objective response rate (iORR, CR+PR) by Immune Response Criteria, with the hypothesis that patients with FATSI negative tumors will have better clinical outcome. Secondary objectives were progression free survival (PFS), 6 months PFS and survival. PEM was given every 3 weeks and computed tomography scans were performed every 6 weeks. We utilized a two-stage phase II trial design to detect an iORR ≥ 20% in the whole population tested vs. the null hypothesis that the true iORR ≤5%. If ≥ 2 of the first 20 evaluable patients had an objective response the trial proceeded to full accrual of 39 evaluable patients. Outcomes were evaluated according to FATSI staining. Results: 42 patients (40 evaluable) (35F,7M; median age 62[36-83]) enrolled. Median # of prior regimens was 2[1-7]. Primary Dx included ovarian/fallopian (13), endometrial (10), colorectal (3), cervix (2), pancreatic(2), vaginal (2) and 1 each of various others. No unexpected toxicities occurred. Response evaluation showed 2 CR, 5 PR, 11 SD, 22 PD and 2 NE (iORR 18%). FATSI tumor analyses results are available in 34 patients; 25 FATSI positive, 9 negative. 2 PR, 8 SD, 14 PD, 1 NE occurred among the FATSI (+) (iORR 8%) and 2 CR, 2 PR, 2 SD, 3 PD among the FATSI (-) patients (iORR 44%). mPFS and 6m-PFS were 54 days and 12% (3/25) in FATSI (+), versus 248 days and 56% (5/9) in FATSI (-) patients; p = 0.017. Conclusions: PEM has meaningful antitumor activity in non MSI-high malignancies with no current FDA approved indications. Evaluation of FATSI as a biomarker supports a biomarker selected population approach. Clinical trial information: NCT03274661.

Modified FOLFOX versus modified FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction: Moonlight, a randomized phase 2 trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4144-TPS4144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran ◽  
Claudia Pauligk ◽  
Thorsten Oliver Goetze ◽  
Jorge Riera-Knorrenschild ◽  
Eray Goekkurt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type I Error ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Type I ◽  
First Line

TPS4144 Background: The majority of patients (pts) with gastroesophageal cancer present with inoperable or metastatic disease and there is a strong need for efficient and tolerable first-line (1L) treatment. Oxaliplatin-based regimens like FOLFOX have become one standard of care. However, median survival is still below 12 months. Results from trials using nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment of subjects with advanced/metastatic GC and GEJ cancers demonstrated clinical activity, in pts whose tumors did or did not express PD-L1; in addition, nivolumab alone and in combination with ipilimumab demonstrated clinical benefits in various other tumor types. Based on this clinical experience, the AIO-STO-0417 trial (Moonlight) has been designed to evaluate the combination of chemotherapy with two checkpoint inhibitors in first-line therapy of pts with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, investigator-initiated phase II trial. Pts with Her2-negative, inoperable, advanced or metastatic gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer will be randomized 1:1 to 1L treatment with FOLFOX (Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m²; Leucovorin 400 mg/m²; 5FU 400 mg/m² on d1 of each treatment cycle and 5FU 1200 mg/m² continuous infusion over 24 hrs d1 and d2) every 2 weeks plus Nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks and Ipilimumab 1mg/kg every 6 weeks (Arm A) or FOLFOX alone (Arm B). Primary endpoint of the trial is progression-free survival based on the ITT population. Main secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, Safety and Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30). 118 pts (59 per arm) will be enrolled to provide 80% power for detecting an average HR of 0.68 using the log rank test at a one-sided type I error of 10%. At the date of submission, (Feb 2019), 28 of planned 118 pts are randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT03647969.

A randomized, open-label phase II study of nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI)-containing regimens versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS482-TPS482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Dean ◽  
Li-Tzong Chen ◽  
Ramesh K. Ramanathan ◽  
Sarah Blanchette ◽  
Bruce Belanger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

TPS482 Background: Two combination chemotherapy regimens have emerged as standard of care options for first-line treatment of mPAC: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) + irinotecan + oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX), and nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine. Nal-IRI (MM-398) is a nanoliposomal formulation of irinotecan. In a randomized phase 3 study (NAPOLI-1), of patients with mPAC who had been previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy, nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV demonstrated its safety and significant clinical activity, increasing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) relative to 5-FU/LV. The goal of this current study is to determine the preliminary safety and efficacy of nal-IRI+ + 5-FU/LV with or without oxaliplatin as compared to nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with mPAC. Methods: This open-label, phase 2 comparative study will be conducted in two parts. Part 1 is a safety run-in of a nal-IRI+5-FU/LV + oxaliplatin regimen. The safety run-in will enroll small cohorts of patients following a traditional 3 + 3 dose escalation design to confirm the target dose of oxaliplatin (n = ~6-18). The primary objective of Part 1 is the safety and tolerability of nal-IRI + 5FU/LV + oxaliplatin. Part 2 is a randomized, efficacy study of a nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV + oxaliplatin regimen (Arm 1), the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV combination that previously demonstrated efficacy in the NAPOLI-1 trial (Arm 2), versus a nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine control arm (Arm 3) (n = ~156-168). The primary objective of Part 2 is to assess the efficacy of nal-IRI-containing regimens in first-line mPAC patients compared to nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine using the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 24 weeks as the primary endpoint. Secondary of part 1 is a PK study and Part 2 secondary endpoints will include OS, PFS, objective response rate (per RECIST, v1.1), decrease in CA19-9 levels and quality of life assessments. Clinical trial information: NCT02551991.

scholarly journals CTIM-15. PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A PHASE II STUDY OF NIVOLUMAB WITH HYPOFRACTIONATED RE-RADIATION AND BEVACIZUMAB FOR RECURRENT MGMT METHYLATED GLIOBLASTOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii36-ii36
Author(s):  
Christian Grommes ◽  
Minesh Mehta ◽  
Alexandra Miller ◽  
Mariza Daras ◽  
Anna Piotrowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Significant Finding ◽  
Trial Treatment

Abstract Standard of standard of care for glioblastoma (GBM) remains unsatisfactory with universal disease recurrence and a median survival of < 2 years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have shown limited single-agent activity in GBM thus far. GBMs with methylated MGMT promoter and no baseline corticosteroid dependence may be most likely to derive benefit from ICI. The combination of ICIs with radiation has shown promising activity in other human cancers. Combining nivolumab and re-RT/bevacizumab in GBM may augment ICI activity through immunogenic effects of radiation, may reduce the risk of radiation necrosis by addition of bevacizumab at the time of radiation, and may reduce the need for corticosteroids. In this multicenter phase II study, nivolumab is combined with re-irradiation and optional concurrent bevacizumab followed by nivolumab in patients with first recurrence of IDH-wildtype and MGMT methylated glioblastoma. Primary objective is to improve 1-year overall survival (OS) from 33 (based on EORTC 26101) to 50%. Nine-three patients are required to show a significant finding with an α of 0.05 and 81% power. Thirteen of 93 patient (14%) have been enrolled with a median age of 59 (range 42–71) with a median KPS of 90 (range 70–90). Treatment has been tolerated well without any grade ≥ 4 toxicities and only one grade 3 (amylase elevation). The most common adverse events were pruritus and hypothyroidism in 3/13 (23%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) is 7 months with a 6months PFS of 55.6%. The 12months OS is 66.7%. Patients with recurrent MGMT methylated, IDH-wildtype glioblastoma tolerate trial treatment with acceptable toxicities. Clinical efficacy in the first patients enrolled shows a promising effect. Enrollment is ongoing.

Phase II study of cabozantinib (cabo) combined with pembrolizumab (pembro) in metastatic or recurrent gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEC) to overcome resistance to checkpoint inhibitors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS253-TPS253
Author(s):  
Farshid Dayyani ◽  
Chloe Thomas ◽  
Gwendolyn Ung ◽  
Thomas H Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Secondary Resistance ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Number Of Patients

TPS253 Background: GEC is the third leading cause of cancer mortality and the fifth most common malignancy worldwide. Fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based combinations are the most commonly used 1L treatment regimens. There are few standard treatment options after 1st line regimens. In the 3L+ GEC Keynote-059 trial, objective response rate (ORR) with Pembro was 15.5% in PD-L1(+) vs. 6.4% in PD-L1(-) tumors. While the responses were durable, the 6-months PFS (6-PFS) was only 14.1% and the median PFS was 2.0 mo. This highlights the remaining unmet need for the majority of patients who either are refractory or develop disease progression following treatment with PD-1 inhibitors in GEC. Cabo plus checkpoint inhibitors have shown clinical benefit in various cancers including hepatocellular, renal cell (RCC), urothelial and castration-resistant prostate cancers. In the CheckMate-9ER trial, Cabo+Nivolumab improved both OS and PFS vs sunitinib in 1L RCC. In patients with RCC who had progression on anti-PD1 inhibitor treatment, Cabo showed promising activity with an ORR of 33% and DCR of 79% (ESMO 2018, abstract 3793). Hypothesis: Based on preclinical and clinical observations, Cabo might contribute to overcoming primary or secondary resistance to PD-1 blockade in GEC. Methods: Prospective, open label, non-randomized phase 2 trial. Eligibility: Diagnosis of GEC, 2+ line of treatment including previous fluoropyrimidine/platinum, ECOG 0-2, adequate organ function, prior checkpoint inhibitor if tumor PD-L1 CPS≥10%. Treatment: Cabozantinib 40mg PO daily, Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on day 1 of 21d cycle. Primary objective: Feasibility of the combination and estimate of efficacy. Primary endpoint:PFS-6. Secondary objectives: OS, ORR, adverse events. Total number of patients to be enrolled N = 27. Current enrollment (Sep 2020) N = 10. Statistics: If the PFS-6 is > 25%, the study would be regarded as positive, in which case it is planned to expand patient enrollment into a larger single arm phase 2 trial with additional sites to establish the efficacy of the regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT04164979.

scholarly journals Ramucirumab in Combination with Pembrolizumab in Treatment-Naïve Advanced Gastric or GEJ Adenocarcinoma: Safety and Antitumor Activity from the Phase 1a/b JVDF Trial

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2985
Author(s):  
Ian Chau ◽  
Nicolas Penel ◽  
Andres O. Soriano ◽  
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau ◽  
Jennifer Cultrera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Combined Positive Score ◽  
Grade 3

Ramucirumab (anti-VEGFR2) plus pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) demonstrated promising antitumor activity and tolerability among patients with previously treated advanced cancers, supporting growing evidence that combination therapies modulating the tumor microenvironment may expand the spectrum of patients who respond to checkpoint inhibitors. Here we present the results of this combination in first-line patients with metastatic G/GEJ cancer. Twenty-eight patients (≥18 years) with no prior systemic chemotherapy in the advanced/metastatic setting received ramucirumab (8 mg/kg days 1 and 8) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg day 1) every 3 weeks as part of JVDF phase 1a/b study. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS). Tumors were PD-L1-positive (combined positive score ≥ 1) in 19 and -negative in 6 patients. Eighteen patients experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events, most commonly hypertension (14%) and elevated alanine/aspartate aminotransferase (11% each), with no grade 4 or 5 reported. The ORR was 25% (PD-L1-positive, 32%; PD-L1-negative, 17%) with duration of response not reached. PFS was 5.6 months (PD-L1-positive, 8.6 months; PD-L1-negative, 4.3 months), and OS 14.6 months (PD-L1-positive, 17.3 months; PD-L1-negative, 11.3 months). Acknowledging study design limitations, ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab had encouraging durable clinical activity with no unexpected toxicities in treatment-naïve biomarker-unselected metastatic G/GEJ cancer, and improved outcomes in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors.

Results of the JAVELIN Gastric 100 phase 3 trial: avelumab maintenance following first-line (1L) chemotherapy (CTx) vs continuation of CTx for HER2− advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 278-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus H. Moehler ◽  
Mikhail Dvorkin ◽  
Mustafa Ozguroglu ◽  
Min-hee Ryu ◽  
Alina Simona Muntean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Post Induction

278 Background: We report the primary analysis of JAVELIN Gastric 100, which compared avelumab (anti–PD-L1) maintenance after 1L CTx vs continued CTx in patients (pts) with GC/GEJC. Methods: In this global, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT02625610), eligible pts had previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced/metastatic (LA/M) HER2− GC/GEJC. Pts without progressive disease (PD) after 12 weeks of 1L oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine induction were randomized 1:1 to avelumab 10 mg/kg Q2W switch maintenance or continued CTx, stratified by region (Asia vs non-Asia). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) post induction in all randomized or PD-L1+ (≥1% of tumor cells, 73-10 assay) pts. Results: 805 pts received induction CTx and 499 pts were randomized (avelumab, n = 249; CTx, n = 250). At data cutoff (Sep 13, 2019), minimum follow-up was 18 months. In the avelumab and CTx arms, median OS post induction/randomization was 10.4 months (95% CI 9.1-12.0) vs 10.9 months (95% CI 9.6-12.4), hazard ratio (HR) 0.91 (95% CI 0.74-1.11; p = 0.1779); 24-month OS rates were 22.1% (95% CI 16.8-28.0) vs 15.5% (95% CI 10.8-20.9), respectively. The HR for OS in PD-L1+ pts (n = 54) was 1.13 (95% CI 0.57-2.23). No OS trend was seen in Asian pts (n = 114; HR 0.90 [95% CI 0.59-1.36]) or other subgroups, except for a potential benefit with avelumab in pts with no metastatic sites at randomization (n = 60; HR 0.52 [95% CI 0.28-0.98]). Progression-free survival was similar between arms (HR 1.04 [95% CI 0.85-1.28]). In the avelumab vs CTx arms, objective response rates (post randomization only) were 13.3% (95% CI 9.3-18.1) vs 14.4% (95% CI 10.3-19.4), and 12-month rates for duration of response were 62.3% (95% CI 40.9-77.9) vs 28.4% (95% CI 13.2-45.7), respectively. Treatment-related adverse event rates (all grades/grade ≥3) were 61.3%/12.8% with avelumab and 77.3%/32.8% with CTx. Conclusions: Avelumab maintenance showed clinical activity and favorable safety vs continued CTx in pts with LA/M GE/GEJC; however, JAVELIN Gastric 100 did not meet its primary objective of demonstrating superior OS in the randomized or PD-L1+ population. Clinical trial information: NCT02625610.

A phase II trial of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with advanced, progressive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 619-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Halperin ◽  
Suyu Liu ◽  
Arvind Dasari ◽  
David R. Fogelman ◽  
Priya Bhosale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Yield Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Pre Treatment

619 Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively rare and heterogeneous tumors arising throughout the aerodigestive tract, which are incurable and life-limiting when metastatic. Prior studies of checkpoint inhibitors in NET patients have yielded minimal evidence of efficacy. Historically, effective therapies for advanced, progressive NET yield response rates less than 10% and progression-free survival (PFS) durations of approximately 11 months, as compared to approximately 4.5 months with placebo. Methods: We undertook a phase II basket study of atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab in patients with rare cancers, and present here the data from the pancreatic NET (pNET) cohort and extrapancreatic NET (epNET) cohort, each of which included 20 patients with grade 1-2 NET that was progressive under any prior therapy. Patients received 1200mg of atezolizumab and 15mg/kg of bevacizumab IV q 21 days. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response by RECIST 1.1. Results: The confirmed objective response rate with this combination was 20% (95% CI 6-44%) in the pNET cohort and 15% (95% CI 3-38%) in the epNET cohort. The median PFS in the pNET cohort is 19.6 months (95% CI 10.6-NR), while it was 14.9 months (95% CI 6.1-NR) in the epNET cohort, 1-year PFS was 75% and 52%, respectively. The combination was well-tolerated in this patient population, with the most common related treatment-emergent adverse events being hypertension (47.5%), proteinuria (37.5%), and fatigue (35%). The most common related grade 3/4 adverse events were hypertension (20%) and proteinuria (7.5%). Conclusions: The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab demonstrated moderate clinical activity in patients with advanced NETs. As pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies were obtained for all patients, correlations with immune infiltration, mutations, and transcriptome alterations should provide additional insight into the mechanisms of response and resistance. Clinical trial information: NCT03074513.

The GAIN-C study (BP25438): Randomized phase II trial of RG7160 (GA201) plus FOLFIRI, compared to cetuximab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFIRI alone in second-line KRAS wild type (WT) or mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3637-TPS3637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Cervantes-Ruiperez ◽  
Ben Markman ◽  
Salvatore Siena ◽  
Carles Pericay ◽  
Giuseppe Aprile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Tumor Biopsy ◽  
Egfr Expression ◽  
To Receive

TPS3637 Background: GA201 is a novel, dual-acting, humanized, glycoengineered IgG1 anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, with enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity in combination with signal inhibition. GA201 demonstrates significantly enhanced in vitro/vivo activity compared to cetuximab (cet) both as a single agent and in combination with irinotecan, in both KRAS mutant and BRAF mutant models and promising clinical activity in ph I and neo-adjuvant trials (Paz Ares et al, JCO 2011) including KRAS mutant mCRC. A randomized ph II program was launched: one study in NSCLC and GAIN-C in mCRC (NCT01326000), which is presented here. Methods: Main inclusion criteria are progression on 1L containing oxaliplatin, ECOG 0-1, and adequate hematological and liver function. Main exclusion criteria: prior anti-EGFR treatment. A total of 160 patients in 2L mCRC (stratified for EGFR expression, disease progression before or after 6 months after starting 1L, prior treatment with bevacizumab Y vs N) will be randomized to receive either GA201 (day 1, 8 of cycle 1 then q2W) or cet (qW) + FOLFIRI q2W (KRAS WT) or to receive GA201+ FOLFIRI or FOLFIRI alone (KRAS mutant). Collection of archival tumor plus a mandatory fresh tumor biopsy at baseline were implemented because ph I data showed that EGFR expression is not concordant between the two specimen types and to optimize assessment of potential immune related biomarkers. The fresh tumor biopsy will be centrally analyzed for EGFR (immunohistochemistry) and KRAS status. Primary objective is progression free survival; secondary endpoints are to define objective response rates, the safety profile, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. A comprehensive biomarker program (blood and tumor), mainly immune-phenotyping, immunohistochemistry in tumor samples (Ventana) and immune functional tests (including adaptive responses) were set up to investigate potential predictive biomarkers and the mode of action of GA201. Study is ongoing worldwide in 9 countries with the safety run-in phase completed in Nov 2011. Recruitment is planned to be completed by end of April 2012.

Phase I study of irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) with sunitinib for advanced gastroesophageal cancers (EGC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15569-e15569
Author(s):  
Sarbajit Mukherjee ◽  
Christos Fountzilas ◽  
Patrick McKay Boland ◽  
Kristopher Attwood ◽  
Wei Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Free Survival

e15569 Background: Sunitinib (S) is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against VEGFR, PDGRF, KIT, FLT-3, and RET. S is synergistic with chemotherapy in preclinical models. We hypothesized that S+FOLFIRI combination will have increased efficacy in advanced EGC. Methods: This was a phase I study for patients with advanced chemo naïve EGC. Dose escalation used a standard 3+3 design. The primary objective was to determine the tolerability and safety of S+FOLFIRI. Secondary objectives were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Results: Twenty-three patients participated in the study (Male 78%, Female 22%). Median age was 60 (Range: 37-77) years. Median follow up time was 67.5 (95% CI: 58.9, 76) months. The most frequently reported adverse events were neutropenia (78%; G3/4: 43%), nausea (74%; G3/4:13%), diarrhea (65%; G3/4: 4%), vomiting (61%, G3/4: 9%) lymphopenia (52%; G3/4: 13%) and fatigue (52%; G3/4:17%).Two dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were noted each at dose level (DL) 1 and 1A, one at DL 1B and 3 at DL 2 (Table 1). Maximum tolerated dose was determined at DL 1B. At the time of data reporting 21 patients had died. Two patients came off the study per investigator request. All patients were evaluated for efficacy. The median OS and PFS were 12.4 (95% CI: 8.9, 16.5) months and 6.2 (95% CI: 3.4, 13.5) months, respectively. Conclusions: S+FOLFIRI was reasonably tolerated, with a manageable safety profile and signs of clinical activity in patients with advanced EGC. This study was supported by a research grant from Pfizer, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT00524186. [Table: see text]

Enhanced efficacy of anti-VEGFR2/taxane therapy after progression on immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in patients (pts) with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (mGEA).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4541-4541
Author(s):  
Lionel Aurelien Kankeu Fonkoua ◽  
Sakti Chakrabarti ◽  
Mohamad Bassam Sonbol ◽  
Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi ◽  
Jason Scott Starr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Small Subset ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Ecog Ps

4541 Background: Anti-VEGFR2 therapy (ramucirumab/paclitaxel [RAM/TAX]) and ICI are approved as 2nd- and 3rd-line therapy (Tx), respectively, for pts with mGEA. We unexpectedly saw durable responses in 2 pts on RAM/TAX after progression on an ICI trial (KN-059; PMID 29674442). We performed a pilot to examine the clinical activity of ICI followed by RAM/TAX. Then we retrospectively compared the outcomes of pts who received this serial Tx to pts who received RAM/TAX without prior ICI. Methods: All pts with mGEA at Mayo Clinic who received RAM/TAX (2014-19) were included (N = 87). Outcomes were best objective response rate (ORR: complete [CR] or partial response) per RECIST1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS). Chi square and multivariate (MV) logistic and Cox regression were used. Results: 15 consecutive pts with measurable mGEA received ICI immediately followed by RAM/TAX after irRECIST progression. Most pts (95%) did not respond to ICI. Yet on RAM/TAX, 100% (15/15) had tumor reduction (range -8% to -100%) with an ORR of 73% (11/15), including 3 CRs. In these pts (who received ICI followed by RAMTAX), PFS on RAMTAX was longer than on last chemotherapy before ICI (12.3 vs 3.0 m, P < .001). Outcomes on RAM/TAX in these pts were significantly better than in pts who received RAM/TAX alone (see Table). Associations were strengthened after adjusting for total lines of Tx, line of Tx of RAM/TAX, age, and ECOG PS. Exploratory analysis of paired tumor biopsies collected pre-ICI and on RAM/TAX in a small subset revealed that the frequency of intratumoral immunosuppressive FOXP3+ Tregs decreased on RAM/TAX, whereas the frequency of antitumor CD8+ T cells was preserved. Conclusions: RAM/TAX immediately preceded by ICI was associated with significantly higher OS, ORR, and DOR than RAM/TAX alone, suggesting ICI may enhance efficacy of subsequent anti-VEGFR/taxane therapy. This novel sequence of therapy will be tested prospectively in a new randomized phase 2 trial (NCT04069273). [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document