Bevacizumab (BEV) plus chemotherapy (CT) continued beyond first progression in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously treated with BEV plus CT: Results of a randomized phase III intergroup study (TML study).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. CRA3503-CRA3503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Arnold ◽  
Thierry Andre ◽  
Jaafar Bennouna ◽  
Javier Sastre ◽  
Pia J. Osterlund ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Reported Data ◽  
The Impact

CRA3503 Background: BEV in combination with fluoropyrimidine-based CT is standard treatment for mCRC in the first-line (1L) and BEV-naïve second-line (2L) settings. This is the first randomized study evaluating the benefit of continuing BEV in combination with standard CT as 2L treatment for patients with mCRC who progressed after receiving a standard BEV-containing regimen in the 1L setting. Methods: Patients with unresectable, histologically confirmed mCRC who progressed within 3 months after discontinuation of 1L BEV + CT were randomised to 2L fluoropyrimidine-based CT ± BEV (2.5 mg/kg/wk equivalent). Choice of oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based 2L CT was dependent on the regimen used in 1L (crossover) and included as a stratification variable. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate and safety. Results: 820 patients were randomized from February 2006 to June 2010 (409 to BEV + CT and 411 to CT alone). Baseline patient and disease characteristics were well balanced between arms. The study met its primary endpoint; median OS was 11.2 months for BEV + CT and 9.8 months for CT (HR=0.81; 95% CI 0.69–0.94; unstratified log-rank test, p=0.0062). Median PFS was 5.7 months for BEV + CT and 4.1 months for CT (HR=0.68; 95% CI 0.59–0.78; unstratified log-rank test, p<0.0001). The response rate was 5.4% for BEV + CT and 3.9% for CT (unstratified Chi-Square Test, p=0.3113). The adverse event profile was consistent with previously reported data for BEV + CT. Compared with historical data from BEV treatment in 1L or 2L mCRC, BEV-related adverse events were not increased when continuing BEV beyond progression. Conclusions: This is the first randomized study to prospectively investigate the impact of continuing BEV treatment in 2L mCRC for patients who progressed after receiving a BEV-containing regimen in 1L. Our findings demonstrate that BEV + CT (crossed over from 1L regimen) continued beyond progression significantly prolongs OS and PFS in 2L mCRC. Additional analysis (including biomarker evaluation) is ongoing.

Pharmacogenetic analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treated with second-line irinotecan (IR)+/− cetuximab (CB): The EPIC experience

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4022-4022
Author(s):  
D. Yang ◽  
A. Pohl ◽  
W. Zhang ◽  
G. Lurje ◽  
Y. Ning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Ca Repeat ◽  
Ras Mutation ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Log Rank Test

4022 Background: EPIC, a multinational phase III clinical trial with IR + CB vs IR alone in mCRC pts in the second-line setting after failure of FOLFOX demonstrated a benefit for IR+CB in progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR). We evaluated functional germline polymorphisms involved in the EGFR- (EGF, EGFR), angiogenesis- (VEGF, IL-8, CXCR-2) - and drug- metabolism related genes (UGT1A1, MTHFR) for their potential role as molecular predictors for clinical outcome in pts treated with CB/IR vs. IR alone. Methods: DNA was extracted from all available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples from the phase III EPIC trial (US sites only). Genotyping was performed using PCR-RFLP assays and 5’ -end [g-33P] ATP’ labeled PCR-protocols. Results: 186 pts were treated either with IR/CB (arm A, 84 pts) or IR (arm B, 102 pts) only. In arm A, 11/84 pts (13%) showed CR or PR, whereas 73/84 (87%) pts had SD or PD. For arm B, 6/102 pts (6%) showed CR or PR, whereas 96/102 pts (94%) had SD or PD. Median PFS in arm A was 3.0 months (95%CI: 2.4- 4.1 months) vs 2.7 months (95%CI: 2.2–2.9 months) in arm B; median overall survival (OS) was 9.3 months (95%CI: 7.1–12.1 months) in arm A vs. 12.3 months (95%CI: 10.4- 17.9 months) in arm B. K-ras mutation status was not significantly associated with PFS or response to CB/IR in the subgroup of 186 patients. We found an EGFR-CA- repeat in intron 1 in arm A to be associated with PFS (p=0.031, log-rank test). In arm B, we found a significant association with RR (p=0.0103, Fisher's exact test) for MTHFR1298. Furthermore, MTHFR 677 (p =0.0048, log-rank test) and MTHFR 1298 (p=0.038, log-rank test) were also found to be associated with OS in arm B. In multivariate analysis, EGFR-CA-repeat was significantly associated with PFS (adjusted p= 0.023). Furthermore, MTHFR 677 and MTHFR 1298 was associated with OS (adjusted p=0.028 and 0.026, respectively, Cox-proportional hazards models), independent from K-ras mutation status, race and number of disease sites. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the potential predictive value of polymorphisms in the EGFR- and MTHFR- gene in mCRC pts treated with IR+ CB. Further validation in additional clinical trials is necessary. [Table: see text]

Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, and Streptozocin in the Treatment of Patients With Locally Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Endocrine Carcinomas

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (23) ◽  
pp. 4762-4771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria A. Kouvaraki ◽  
Jaffer A. Ajani ◽  
Paulo Hoff ◽  
Robert Wolff ◽  
Douglas B. Evans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Median Response ◽  
Log Rank Test

Purpose The role of systemic chemotherapy in the management of pancreatic endocrine carcinoma (islet cell carcinoma; PEC) is an area of considerable controversy. Response rates ranging from 6% to 69% have been reported for streptozocin-based chemotherapy. We retrospectively studied 84 patients with locally advanced or metastatic PEC who had been treated with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and streptozocin (FAS) to determine the objective response rate, duration of progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of overall survival (OS). Patients and Methods Eligible patients had histologic or cytologic confirmation of their tumor and measurable disease on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans. Response to treatment was evaluated in this study using the new international criteria proposed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Committee. Results Sixty-one of the patients were male and 23 were female, with a median age of 54 years (range, 24 to 78 years). The response rate (RR) to FAS was 39%, with a median response duration of 9.3 months. The 2-year PFS rate was 41%, and the 2-year OS rate was 74%. The extent of liver metastatic disease correlated with a worse PFS (P = .01 by log-rank test) and a worse OS (P < .0001 by log-rank test). Analyses showed that metastatic replacement of more than 75% of the liver and prior chemotherapy were independently associated with inferior PFS. Conclusion Patients with locally advanced or metastatic PEC who are treated with FAS may have a reasonable RR, and responders may experience longer PFS and OS. The volume of metastases in the liver is the most important predictor of outcome.

An EORTC Gastrointestinal Group phase III evaluation of combinations of methyl-CCNU, 5-fluorouracil, and adriamycin in advanced gastric cancer.

1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 1387-1393 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Lacave ◽  
J Wils ◽  
H Bleiberg ◽  
E Diaz-Rubio ◽  
N Duez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Multicenter Trial ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Short Survival ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Prospective Phase ◽  
To Receive

In a prospective phase III multicenter trial, 189 patients with advanced measurable and nonmeasurable gastric cancer were randomized to receive 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with Adriamycin (FA) or FA plus methyl-CCNU (MeFA). The response rate in patients with measurable disease was 10% (three of 29), and 18% (five of 28), respectively. No difference in the duration of survival was detected (P = .14; log rank test). Median survivals were 21 and 32 weeks, respectively. Toxicity was moderate, but there have been two toxic deaths among the patients who received FA. Because of the low response rate and the short survival, neither regimen can be recommended for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Updated result on the 2.5-year follow-up of GC0301/TOP-002: Randomized phase III study of irinotecan plus S-1 (IRI-S) versus S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4544-4544
Author(s):  
A. Tsuburaya ◽  
H. Narahara ◽  
H. Imamura ◽  
K. Hatake ◽  
H. Imamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Diffuse Type ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Significant Superiority

4544 Background: IRI-S had longer in median survival time (MST) than S-1 alone, and was well tolerated in previously untreated AGC, but not statistically significant. Considering 68 patients (pts) were censored, further follow-up was needed to confirm the OS with more precision (Imamura et al. ASCO-GI 2008). We now present updated results of OS and exploratory analysis with the prolonged 2.5 year follow-up data. Methods: Treatments Arm A (oral S-1 80 mg/m2/day from Day 1 to 28, q6w), or Arm B (IRI-S; oral S-1 80 mg/m2/day from Day 1 to 21 and intravenous irinotecan 80 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 15, q5w) were continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities were observed. The primary endpoint was to compare OS between groups. This updated result was regarded as exploratory position. Results: Although the MST of Arm A was 319 days (95%Cl: 286–395) and of Arm B was 389 days (95%Cl: 324–459), Arm B didn’t show statistically significant superiority to Arm A (log-rank test p=0.54; hazard ratio (HR) =0.93). The 1-year survival was 45.0% in Arm A and 52.0% in Arm B, and the 2-year survival was 22.5% and 18.0%, respectively. Response rate was significantly different (Arm A/B, 26.9%/41.5%; chi-square test p=0.04) in 187 patient evaluated by RECIST criteria. Time to treatment failure was also favored in Arm B (median=138 days) compared to Arm A (111 days; log-rank test p=0.16; HR=0.85). In subset analyses, two groups showed possibility of clinical benefit in Arm B. The HR of diffuse type group was 0.71 (95%Cl: 0.52–0.96), and of PS1, 2 group was 0.63 (95%Cl: 0.42–0.95). As post protocol treatment, 45.6% of Arm A patients received an irinotecan-based regimen, and the MST of them was 496 days (95%Cl: 395–573). Conclusions: IRI-S did not show statistically significant superiority to S-1 alone in OS with this follow-up data. Post protocol treatment, effective treatment after S-1 failure might have affected survival. According to exploratory analyses, IRI-S may have clinical benefit in early-term of treatment, group of the diffuse type and that of PS1, 2. We need more considering predictive factors, because the gastric cancer is heterogeneous adenocarcinoma. [Table: see text]

Everolimus in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET): Updated results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial (RADIANT-3).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 158-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Shah ◽  
T. Ito ◽  
C. Lombard-Bohas ◽  
E. M. Wolin ◽  
E. Van Cutsem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Somatostatin Analogs ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Patient Subgroups

158 Background: There is an unmet medical need for effective treatments for patients with advanced pNET. Systemic therapies for advanced pNET are limited both by toxicity and efficacy. Everolimus, an oral mTOR inhibitor, has shown promising antitumor activity in 2 phase II studies, leading to further investigation in the largest phase III randomized controlled trial completed in pNET patients. Methods: Patients with advanced low- or intermediate-grade pNET were randomly assigned to everolimus 10 mg/d orally + best supportive care (BSC; n = 207) or placebo + BSC (n = 203). Long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSAs) were permitted as BSC during the study. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). At progression (RECIST), patients could be unblinded and those randomly assigned to placebo were offered open-label everolimus. Results: Compared with placebo, everolimus reduced the risk of progression by 65% and increased median PFS by more than 6 months, from 4.6 to 11.0 months (HR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.27-0.45; p < 0.0001), by investigator review (primary endpoint). Median PFS by central review was consistent (HR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.44; p < 0.001] in favor of everolimus. Eighteen-month PFS estimates were 34% for everolimus (95% CI: 26-43) vs 9% (95% CI: 4-16) for placebo. Everolimus demonstrated a significant PFS benefit across all patient subgroups according to baseline characteristics and prior SSA use. Prior SSA use was 49% in the everolimus arm and 50% in the placebo arm. Updated analyses of the impact of concomitant SSA will be reported. The most common drug-related adverse events were stomatitis, rash, diarrhea, fatigue, and infections (primarily upper respiratory); most were grade 1 or 2. Stomatitis (6.9% vs 0%), anemia (6% vs 0%), and hyperglycemia (5% vs 2%) were the most common grade 3-4 events. Conclusions: Everolimus significantly prolonged PFS compared with placebo in patients with advanced pNET in this large phase III clinical trial. This benefit was seen across all patient subgroups. Treatment resulted in a significant 6.4-month prolongation in median PFS. Everolimus had an acceptable and predictable safety profile. [Table: see text]

ROCHOP study: A phase III randomized study of CHOP compared to romidepsin-CHOP in untreated peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8616-TPS8616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Delarue ◽  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Mark S. Hertzberg ◽  
Won Seog Kim ◽  
Dolores Caballero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
T Cell Lymphomas ◽  
Ann Arbor ◽  
Efficacy Parameters

TPS8616 Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) account for 10-15% of lymphomas. They share an aggressive clinical behaviour and a poor prognosis when treated by CHOP-like regimen which is nevertheless consider as a standard because others regimens failed to demonstrate survival advantage. Romidepsin is a histone deacetylase inhibitor with promising results in PTCL. First trials showed a response rate of 38% in heavily pre-treated PTCL patients. These results were confirmed with 15% of patients reaching a CR/CRu, 89% of them without disease progression at 13 months. Adverse events include gastrointestinal, hematologic and asthenic conditions. A phase I study of romidepsin combined with CHOP was conducted by LYSA. A total of 18 patients were included. The recommended dose was 12 mg/m² administered at day 1 and day 8 of each cycle. Methods: Ro-CHOP study is an international phase III study comparing 6 cycles of CHOP21 with 6 cycles of romidepsin-CHOP21 (EUDRACT 2012-001580-68). Primary endpoint is Progression-Free Survival assessed independently. Secondary objectives include overall survival, other efficacy parameters, analysis of response rate according to 18FDG-PET, safety, quality of life and biological ancillary studies. A total of 420 subjects aged from 18 to 80 years will be enrolled in the study. Main inclusion criteria are untreated PTCL whatever Ann Arbor stage and a performance status of 0-2. Main exclusion criteria are other subtypes of lymphoma, HTLV1 positivity, any cardiac abnormality, poor renal, hepatic and marrow functions unless related to lymphoma. Patients are randomized 1:1 between the two regimens. A stratification is performed with IPI score, age and histology. The first patient has been included in January 2013. A recruitment of 10.5 patients per month is anticipated, with a total duration of the study of 60 months. An update on enrolment will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: 2012-001580-68.

Weekly selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (SVd) versus twice weekly bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after one to three prior therapies: Initial results of the phase III BOSTON study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8501-8501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Sosana Delimpasi ◽  
Maryana Simonova ◽  
Ivan Spicka ◽  
Ludek Pour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Full Dataset ◽  
Boston Study ◽  
Eortc Qlq

8501 Background: Selinexor is an oral, selective inhibitor of XPO1-mediated nuclear export, leading to the reactivation of tumor suppressor proteins. In a phase 1b/2 study, the combination of once weekly (QW) selinexor with bortezomib and dexamethasone (SVd) was well tolerated with anti-MM activity in patients (pts) with PI-sensitive and PI-refractory disease. While twice weekly (BIW) bortezomib in combination therapy is efficacious, prolonged use is limited due to peripheral neuropathy (PN, 50-60%). The BOSTON study was designed to determine if SVd improves progression free survival (PFS), overall response rates (ORR) and reduces the rate of PN vs Vd. Methods: BOSTON is a global, phase 3, randomized study of QW SVd vs BIW Vd after 1-3 prior anti-MM regimens. The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints include ORR, overall survival (OS) and PN (rates and EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 outcomes). Randomization is stratified by treatment with prior PI therapies, number of prior anti-MM regimens (1 vs > 1), and Revised International Staging System (R-ISS; Stage III vs I or II). Following confirmation of progressive disease, pts on Vd could cross over to either: 1) SVd for pts able to tolerate continued bortezomib or 2) selinexor and dexamethasone for pts with bortezomib intolerance. Results:402 pts were enrolled; 195 and 207 to SVd and Vd, respectively. Median age was 67 (range: 38-90). Most (59.6%) pts were > 65 years and 57.1% were male. R-ISS stage at the time of MM diagnosis was III for 18.5% of pts. Baseline characteristics were balanced across the 2 arms. SVd significantly prolonged PFS vs Vd (median 13.93 vs 9.46 months, HR = 0.70, P = 0.0066). SVd was associated with a significantly higher ORR (76.4% vs 62.3%, P = 0.0012). Median OS was not reached on SVd vs 25 months on Vd (P = 0.28). Most frequent treatment-related adverse events (grade ≥3) for SVd vs Vd were thrombocytopenia (35.9% vs 15.2%), fatigue (11.3% vs 0.5%) and nausea (7.7% vs 0%). Clinically important differences were reported on the motor, autonomic and sensory scales on CIPN20. PN rates (grade ≥2) were significantly lower with SVd vs Vd (21.0% vs 34.3%, P = 0.0013). Conclusions: BOSTON is the first phase 3 study to evaluate the clinical benefit of SVd for relapsed/refractory MM. The study met the primary endpoint: once weekly SVd significantly improved PFS and ORR compared to twice weekly Vd. Rates of PN were significantly reduced with numerically fewer deaths on SVd vs Vd. Full dataset will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03110562 .

A phase III randomized study of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, for active ankylosing spondylitis

2021 ◽  
pp. jrheum.201088
Author(s):  
Peter C. Taylor ◽  
Désirée van der Heijde ◽  
Robert Landewé ◽  
Shannon McCue ◽  
Sue Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Upper Respiratory Infection ◽  
Phosphodiesterase 4 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitor

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods This phase III, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT01583374) randomized patients with active AS (1:1:1) to placebo, apremilast 20 mg twice daily, or apremilast 30 mg twice daily for 24 weeks, followed by a long-term extension phase (up to 5 years). The primary endpoint was assessment of the SpondyloArthritis International Society 20 (ASAS 20) response at Week 16. The impact of treatment on radiographic outcomes after 104 weeks was assessed using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). Results In total, 490 patients with active AS were randomized in the study (placebo: n=164; apremilast 20 mg twice daily: n=163; apremilast 30 mg twice daily: n=163). The primary endpoint of ASAS 20 response at Week 16 was not met (placebo: 37%; apremilast 20 mg twice daily: 35%; apremilast 30 mg twice daily: 33%; p=0.44 vs placebo). At Week 104, mean (SD) changes from baseline in mSASSS were 0.83 (3.6), 0.98 (2.2), and 0.57 (1.9) in patients initially randomized to placebo, apremilast 20 mg twice daily, and apremilast 30 mg twice daily, respectively. The most frequently reported adverse events through Week 104 were diarrhea, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory infection, and nausea. Conclusion No clinical benefit was observed with apremilast treatment in patients with active AS. The safety and tolerability of apremilast were consistent with its known profile.

scholarly journals Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Uterine Adenosarcoma

Sarcoma ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Nathenson ◽  
Anthony P. Conley ◽  
Heather Lin ◽  
Nicole Fleming ◽  
Vinod Ravi
Keyword(s):  
Hormonal Therapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Study Population ◽  
The Difference

Purpose. This study retrospectively evaluated overall survival (OS) by treatment of recurrent or metastatic uterine adenosarcoma including surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy and evaluated OS and progression-free survival (PFS) after 1st line systemic chemotherapy. Methods. 78 patients with recurrent or metastatic adenosarcoma comprised the study population. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and PFS. The log-rank test was performed to test the difference in survival between groups. Results. Median OS from diagnosis of recurrent or metastatic disease was 1.8 yrs. OS was influenced by pathology on recurrence, p=0.035. Median OS differed by surgery for 1st recurrence 26.3 months versus 15.1 months. OS was not influenced by chemotherapy, p=0.58, palliative radiation, p=0.58, or hormonal therapy, p=0.15. The response rate (CR + PR) per RECIST 1.1 for chemotherapy was 31.2% for doxorubicin-based regimens and 14.3% for gemcitabine/docetaxel. OS since 1st line chemotherapy was not significantly different among chemotherapy regimens. However, the median PFS was superior for doxorubicin/ifosfamide (15.4 months) compared to gemcitabine/docetaxel (5.0 months), platinum-based regimens (5.7 mo), or other doxorubicin-based regimens (6.5 months). Conclusion. These results suggest that surgery is an important treatment modality for recurrent or metastatic uterine adenosarcoma, and the most effective chemotherapeutics are doxorubicin/ifosfamide and gemcitabine/docetaxel.

scholarly journals Role of radiotherapy to bulky sites of advanced Hodgkin lymphoma treated with ABVD: final results of FIL HD0801 trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umberto Ricardi ◽  
Mario Levis ◽  
Andrea Evangelista ◽  
Daniela Maria Gioia ◽  
Gian Mauro Sacchetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sample Size ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Metabolic Response ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Consolidation Radiotherapy

The role of consolidation radiotherapy (RT) to bulky lesions is controversial for advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients achieving complete metabolic response (CMR) after ABVD-based chemotherapy. Herein we present the final results of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi HD0801 trial, investigating the potential benefit of RT in that particular setting. In this phase III randomized study, patients with a bulky lesion at baseline (mass with the largest diameter ≥5 cm) achieving CMR after 2 and 6 ABVD cycles were randomly assigned 1:1 to RT vs observation with a primary endpoint of event-free survival (EFS) at two years. The sample size was calculated estimating an EFS improvement for RT of 20% (from 60% to 80%). The secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). One-hundred and sixteen (116) patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomized. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed a 2-year EFS of 87.8% vs. 85.8% for RT vs. observation, respectively (HR:1.5, CI:0.6-3.5, p=0.34). Per-protocol (PP) analysis showed a 2-year EFS of 89.6% vs. 85.8%, respectively (HR:1.19, CI:0.47-3.02, p=0.71). At 2 years, ITT PFS was 91.3% vs. 85.8% (HR:1.2, CI:0.5-3, p=0.7), while PP PFS was 93.8% vs. 85.8% (HR:0.7, CI:0.2-2.1, p=0.52) for RT vs observation, respectively. Our study showed that patients in CMR randomized to observation have a very good outcome and the primary endpoint of a 20% benefit in EFS for RT was not met. However, the sample size was under-powered to detect a benefit of 10% or less, keeping open the question on potential, more limited, role of RT in this setting. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT00784537.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document