Effect of lymphadenectomy on survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 65-65
Author(s):  
Khaldoun Almhanna ◽  
Jill M. Weber ◽  
Ravi Shridhar ◽  
Sarah E. Hoffe ◽  
Richard C. Karl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Gastrointestinal Malignancies ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Nodal Harvest ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Disease Free

65 Background: The number of resected lymph nodes is associated with overall and disease-free survival in some gastrointestinal malignancies. The impact of nodal harvest during esophagectomy remains to be determined. We examined the influence of lymphadenectomy on overall survival in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods: Utilizing a prospectively maintained comprehensive esophageal cancer database we identified patients who underwent esophagectomy with between 1994 and 2011. The association between disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and nodal harvest was evaluated using multivariable Cox regression models. The number of harvested nodes was examined as a categorical variable based on strata(S): 1) ≤8, 2) 9-12, 3) 13-20, and 4) >20. Results: We identified 635 patients, 541 males and 94 females with a median age of 65 years (28-86) and median follow-up of 22 months (0-168). Adenocarcinoma 559 (88 %) was the predominant histology where as squamous cell carcinoma represented 76 (12%) of the cases. The 5-year OS and DFS rate for S1-S4 was (43%, 42%, 55%, and 36%, p=0.1836) and (44%, 37%, 46%, and 36%, p=0.5166) respectively. There were 209 patients with metastatic disease in 1 or more lymph nodes. The 5-year OS and DFS for S1-S4 was (17%, 31%, 21%, and 27%, p=0.4372) and (17%, 23%, 16%, and 25%, p=0.2726). There were 418 node negative patients. The 5-year OS and DFS rates by S1-S4 was (54%, 51%, 79%, and 26%, p=0.0538) and (55%, 48%, 64%, and 27%, p=0.3703). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients within S3 exhibited a survival benefit adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.57 (CI 0.360-0.916, p=0.020). However patients within S1 were more likely to die, AOR 1.74 (CI 1.09-2.78, p=0.020). No survival benefit was demonstrated for patients within (S4) AOR 1.11 (CI 0.60-2.09, p=0.731). There were 171 (27.5%) recurrences with a median time to recurrence of 12.2 (1-101) months. There were no differences in recurrences between strata p=0.129. Conclusions: We demonstrated that patients with ≤8 lymph nodes resected were more likely to die of their disease compared to those with 13-20 nodes resected. Additionally, extended lymphadenectomy (>20 nodes) does not increase the likelihood of proper staging and does not improve patient outcome.

Prognostic significance of lymphadenectomy in patients with esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 87-87
Author(s):  
Charmi Vijapura ◽  
Ravi Shridhar ◽  
Jill M. Weber ◽  
Sarah E. Hoffe ◽  
Jeremiah Lee Deneve ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Nodal Harvest ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Disease Free

87 Background: The optimal number of lymph nodes that should be harvested in esophageal cancer patients remains to be defined, particularly in patients that receive neoadjuvant therapies. We investigated the impact of nodal resection and survival in esophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NT). Methods: Using our comprehensive esophageal cancer database we identified patients treated with NT followed by esophagectomy between 2000-2011. Clinical and pathologic data were compared using Fisher’s exact and chi-square while, Kaplan Meier estimates were used for survival analysis. Overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared with varying numbers of lymph nodes resected <10 and ≥10 (ST-1), <12 and ≥12 (ST-2), and <15 and ≥15 (ST-3). Multivariate analysis was analyzed by the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: We identified 358 patients treated with NT and esophagectomy with a median follow-up of 18.5 months (range, 0-116 months). There was no survival benefit demonstrated for patients with increased lymph nodes removed during their surgery (ST-1 OS p=0.400, DFS p=0.8727; ST-2 OS p=0.6833, DFS p=0.6092; ST-3 OS p=0.1798, DFS p=0.4028). Patients were further stratified by pathologic response to NT and nodal harvest. There were no differences in OS or DFS in patients with increased nodal harvest when analyzed by complete (pCR) (ST-1 OS p=0.7278, DFS p=0.3602; ST-2 OS p=0.6182, DFS p=0.3592; ST-3 OS p=0.4489, DFS p=0.6976), partial (pPR) (ST-1 OS p=0.3762, DFS p=0.5061; ST-2 OS p=0.8036, DFS p=0.6497; ST-3 OS p=0.0890, DFS p=0.3364), or non response (pNR) (ST-1 OS p=0.6825, DFS p=0.7161; ST-2 OS p=0.7084, DFS p=0.8351; ST-3 OS p=0.5002, DFS p=0.7314) to NT. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age (p=0.028), t-stage (p=0.006), pPR (p=0.025), and pNR (p<0.0005) to NT were all independent predictors of mortality. Conclusions: In our experience, the number of lymph nodes resected was not predictive for overall or disease free survival in esophageal cancer patients treated with NT. In addition, extended lymph node resection did not improve survival for those with residual disease.

855 OPTIMIZATION OF SURGICAL DELAY AFTER INDUCTION CHEMORADIATION FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: 10 YEARS RETROSPECTIVE MULTI-CENTER STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Legault-Dupuis ◽  
Philippe Bouchard ◽  
Frederic Nicodème ◽  
Jean-Pierre Gagne ◽  
Serge Simard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Pathologic Response ◽  
Complete Pathologic Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Surgical Delay ◽  
Multi Center Study ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Center Study

Abstract   The treatment of esophageal cancer is in constant evolution. Most of the esophageal cancer receive induction chemoradiation therapy. Surgical delay has been studied but the optimal timing has not been clarified. Through the years, surgical delay has been modified by surgeons in our institutions, going from an average of 6 weeks delay to an average of 10 weeks delay. It is time to ask if this change has a real positive impact on our patient. Methods In this retrospective multi-center study, we combined data from two center in Quebec city that performs oncologic esophagectomy. The surgical delay went from 6 to 10 weeks around 2014. All surgeons changed their practice at that moment. We retrospectively analysed 5 years before and after the change of practice and created two cohorts of patients. Our primary outcome compared complete pathologic response rate. Our secondary outcomes were surgical complications, anastomotic leak, disease free survival and overall survival. Results Thirty-eight patients had surgery under 8 weeks (mean: 6 weeks) after their induction chemoradiation compared to 64 patients that had surgery after 8 weeks (mean: 10 weeks). There was no statistical significant difference between groups for the complete pathologic response (32% vs 25%, p = 0,16). Important complications were similar, with a rate of 24% vs 28% (p = 0,69). Anastomotic leaks were less frequent in the less than 8 weeks group, but no statistical significance was obtained (13% vs 27%, p = 0,14).No difference in the disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate was noted (DFS 40% vs 55% (p = 0,32), OS 38% vs 38% (p = 0,29)). Conclusion The treatment of esophageal cancer is in constant evolution, induction therapy and surgical technics involve over time. Surgical delay has no impact on complete pathologic response, complication and overall survival. There is no advantage to wait longer before surgery.

Increased Expression of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) Receptor CD74 Is Associated with Inferior Outcome in Younger Patients (Pts) with Cytogenetically Normal Acute Myeloid Leukemia (CN-AML): a Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Study.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1616-1616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eyal C. Attar ◽  
Kati Maharry ◽  
Krzysztof Mrózek ◽  
Michael D. Radmacher ◽  
Susan P. Whitman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cellular Proliferation ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Abstract 1616 Poster Board I-642 CD74 is a type II integral membrane protein receptor that binds its ligand MIF to induce phosphorylation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 (ERK-1/2) and drive cellular proliferation via nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB) activation. CD74 expression has been identified in human solid tumors, and its expression is associated with adverse prognosis in advanced pancreatic cancer. As CD74 is expressed and NF-kB constitutively activated in myeloblasts, we hypothesized that CD74 expression might also be associated with adverse outcome in AML. To investigate the prognostic impact of CD74 expression in the context of other predictive molecular markers in CN-AML, we assessed CD74 expression levels by Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 microarray in 102 younger [<60 years (y)] adults with primary CN-AML, treated on the front-line CALGB 19808 trial with an induction regimen containing daunorubicin, cytarabine, etoposide and, in some cases, the inhibitor of multidrug resistance valspodar, and consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation. Microarray data were analyzed using the Robust Multichip Average method, making use of a GeneAnnot chip definition file, which resulted in a single probe-set measurement for CD74. At diagnosis, CD74 expression, when assessed as a continuous variable, was significantly associated only with extramedullary disease involvement (P=.006) among clinical features, and with none of the molecular prognostic variables tested, including NPM1, WT1, CEBPA, FLT3 (FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD) mutations, MLL partial tandem duplication, or differential BAALC and ERG expression levels. Although CD74 expression levels were not associated with achievement of complete remission (CR; 83% vs 81%), higher levels of CD74 were associated with shorter disease-free survival [DFS; P=.046, hazard ratio (HR) 1.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-3.08] and with shorter overall survival (OS; P=.02, HR 1.32, CI 1.04-1.67). In multivariable analyses, higher CD74 expression was independently associated with shorter DFS (P=.045, HR 1.98, CI 1.16-3.40), after adjusting for WT1 mutations (P<.001) and FLT3-TKD (P=.04), and shorter OS (P=.01, HR 1.58, CI 1.11-2.25) after adjusting for FLT3-TKD (P=.02), WT1 mutations (P=.007), BAALC expression levels (P=.02), white blood counts (P=.007), and extramedullary involvement (P=.04). As quartiles 2-4 had similar expression levels distinct from the lowest quartile, to display the impact of CD74 expression levels on clinical outcome only, pts were dichotomized into low (the lowest quartile) and high (the top three quartiles) CD74 expressers. The Kaplan-Meier curves for DFS and OS (Figures 1 and 2) are shown below. In conclusion, our study identifies elevated CD74 expression as associated with adverse prognosis in younger CN-AML pts. Since we previously reported that higher CD74 expression was favorably associated with achievement of CR in AML patients receiving chemotherapy plus bortezomib, an inhibitor of the proteasome and NF-kB (Attar et al., Clin Cancer Res, 2008;14:1446-54), it is possible that in future studies elevated CD74 levels can be used not only for prognostication, but also to stratify CN-AML pts to study of bortezomib-containing chemotherapy regimens. Figure 1 Disease free survival Figure 1. Disease free survival Figure 2 Overall survival Figure 2. Overall survival Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Can CRM status on MRI predict survival in locally advanced rectal cancers: Experience from the Indian subcontinent.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15167-e15167
Author(s):  
Jay Rashmi Anam ◽  
Mihir Chandarana ◽  
Supreeta Arya ◽  
Ashwin Luis Desouza ◽  
Vikas S. Ostwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mri Scans ◽  
Rectal Cancers ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Disease Free

e15167 Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation has become the standard approach for treatment of locally advanced rectal cancers. Magnetic Resonence Imaging (MRI) is the staging modality of choice in rectal carcinoma. Recent reports have studied the impact of MRI on local recurrence and survival both in treatment naïve and post treatment settings Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospective database was performed over a period of 1 year. All pretreatment patients with carcinoma of rectum were included in the study. The status of CRM on MRI was compared to that on the histopathology and as a predictor of recurrence and survival. For analysis, the MRI scans done for patients at presentation were labeled as MRIT. This included all patients irrespective of further treatment received. Patients who were treated with NACTRT had two MRI scans. The MRI at presentation in this subset of patients was labeled as MRI1 and the reassessment MRI after NACTRT was labeled as MRI2. Thus, MRI1 represented a subset of MRIT with locally advanced tumors treated with NACTRT. All the sets of MRI scans were analyzed separately for prediction of CRM involvement and for their effect on local recurrence and survival rates. Results: 221 patients were included with a median follow-up 30 months. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of MRIT, MRI1 and MRI2 to predict CRM status were 50%, 62.3%, 96.5%, 5.6% and 61.8%, 50%, 55%, 95%, 6% and 54.7% and 77.8%, 63.7%, 98%, 11%, 64.5% respectively. On multivariate analysis pathological positive margins alone predicted a poor overall survival (OS) whereas involved CRM on pathology and pretreatment MRI predicted poorer disease free survival and OS Conclusions: CRM status on pathology remains the most important prognostic factor to impact overall survival, disease free survival and local recurrence. CRM status on MRI at presentation alone has significant impact on disease free survival and local recurrence. Although MRI done after neoadjuvant treatment may not predict survival, it has a role in helping modify the surgical approach with a goal to achieve a negative CRM on pathology.

Long-Term Results of RTOG Trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113): A Random Assignment Trial Comparison of Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Compared With Surgery Alone for Esophageal Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (24) ◽  
pp. 3719-3725 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. Kelsen ◽  
Katryn A. Winter ◽  
Leonard L. Gunderson ◽  
Joanne Mortimer ◽  
Norman C. Estes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Preoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
R1 Resection ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose We update Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113), a comparison of chemotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for patients with localized esophageal cancer. The relationship between resection type and between tumor response and outcome were also analyzed. Patients and Methods The chemotherapy group received preoperative cisplatin plus fluorouracil. Outcome based on the type of resection (R0, R1, R2, or no resection) was evaluated. The main end point was overall survival. Disease-free survival, relapse pattern, the influence of postoperative treatment, and the relationship between response to preoperative chemotherapy and outcome were also evaluated. Results Two hundred sixteen patients received preoperative chemotherapy, 227 underwent immediate surgery. Fifty-nine percent of surgery only and 63% of chemotherapy plus surgery patients underwent R0 resections (P = .5137). Patients undergoing less than an R0 resection had an ominous prognosis; 32% of patients with R0 resections were alive and free of disease at 5 years, only 5% of patients undergoing an R1 resection survived for longer than 5 years. The median survival rates for patients with R1, R2, or no resections were not significantly different. While, as initially reported, there was no difference in overall survival for patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy compared with the surgery only group, patients with objective tumor regression after preoperative chemotherapy had improved survival. Conclusion For patients with localized esophageal cancer, whether or not preoperative chemotherapy is administered, only an R0 resection results in substantial long-term survival. Even microscopically positive margins are an ominous prognostic factor. After a R1 resection, postoperative chemoradiotherapy therapy offers the possibility of long-term disease-free survival to a small percentage of patients.

scholarly journals Outcome in Advanced Ovarian Cancer following an Appropriate and Comprehensive Effort at Upfront Cytoreduction: A Twenty-Year Experience in a Single Cancer Institute

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marszalek ◽  
Séverine Alran ◽  
Suzy Scholl ◽  
Virginie Fourchotte ◽  
Corinne Plancher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Surgical Procedure ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Disease Free

Objectives. The purpose of this retrospective evaluation of advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients was to compare outcome with published findings from other centers and to discuss future options for the management of advanced ovarian carcinoma patients.Methods. A retrospective series of 340 patients with a mean age of 58 years (range: 17–88) treated for FIGO stage III and IV ovarian cancer between January 1985 and January 2005 was reviewed. All patients had primary cytoreductive surgery, without extensive bowel, peritoneal, or systematic lymph node resection, thereby allowing initiation of chemotherapy without delay. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in combination with alkylating agents before 2000, whereas carboplatin and paclitaxel regimes were generally used after 1999-2000. Overall survival and disease-free survival were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.Results. With a mean followup of 101 months (range: 5 to 203), 280 events (recurrence or death) were observed and 245 patients (72%) had died. The mortality and morbidity related to surgery were low. The main prognostic factor for overall survival was postoperative residual disease (P<.0002), while the main prognostic factor for disease-free survival was histological tumor type (P<.0007). Multivariate analysis identified three significant risk factors: optimal surgery (RR=2.2for suboptimal surgery), menopausal status (RR=1.47for postmenopausal women), and presence of a taxane in the chemotherapy combination (RR=0.72).Conclusion. These results confirm that optimal surgery defined by an appropriate and comprehensive effort at upfront cytoreduction limits morbidity related to the surgical procedure and allows initiation of chemotherapy without any negative impact on survival. The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to improve resectability while lowering the morbidity of the surgical procedure is discussed.

Effect of lymph node harvest for squamous cell cancer of the esophagus on survival.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 102-102
Author(s):  
Jeremiah Lee Deneve ◽  
Jill M. Weber ◽  
Sarah E. Hoffe ◽  
Ravi Sridhar ◽  
Khaldoun Almhanna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Pathologic Response ◽  
Carcinoma Of The Esophagus ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Disease Free

102 Background: The optimal number of lymph nodes harvested remains controversial in patients with esophageal cancer. Pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy (NT) has demonstrated improved survival. However, little is known regarding the impact of NT or nodal harvest in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus. We examined the extent of LN harvest and outcome in patients who underwent esophagectomy for SCC. Methods: After IRB approval, using a comprehensive esophageal cancer database we identified patients who underwent esophagectomy between 1994-2011. Clinical and pathologic data were compared using Fisher’s exact and chi-square when appropriate while Kaplan-Meier estimates were utilized for survival analysis. Nodal strata were set at 12 (ST-1), 15 (ST-2), and 20 nodes (ST-3). Pathologic response to NT was defined as complete (pCR), partial (pPR), or non-response (pNR). Results: We identified 76 patients who underwent esophagectomy for SCC between 1994-2011. The median age was 62.5 years (40-85 months) with median follow up of 18.5 months (1-157 months). 48 (63%) were male and 28 (37%) were female. Twenty-eight patients (37%) underwent primary esophagectomy alone (PE) while 48 (63%) patients were treated with NT. Extent of lymphadenectomy had no significant impact on overall survival (OS) or disease free survival (DFS) for the entire cohort ST-1 p=0.8 and p=0.9, ST-2 p=0.5 and p=0.4, and ST-3 p=0.5 and 0.4, respectively. Among the patients who received NT, pCR was observed in 28 (58%), pPR in 14 (29)%, and pNR in 6 (13)%. When examining the degree of pathologic response to treatment, extent of LN harvest had no significant impact on OS or DFS for patients who underwent esophagectomy after NT (p=ns across all strata). Conclusions: The extent of LN harvest failed to demonstrate an overall or disease free survival benefit in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Moreover, patients treated with NT also did not benefit from increased nodal resection irrespective of their pathologic response.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document