Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of the antitemolerase agent KML001 (KML) and cisplatin (CDDP) in advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2515-2515
Author(s):  
Martin J. Edelman ◽  
Josephine Louella Feliciano ◽  
Miroslav Styblo ◽  
Tao Liu ◽  
Rena G. Lapidus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Inorganic Arsenic ◽  
Compartmental Analysis ◽  
Hepatic Function ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Qtc Interval ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Blood Specimens ◽  
Grade 3

2515 Background: Telomerase is overexpressed in most solid tumors and rarely expressed in adult tissues and is therefore a promising target. We have previously demonstrated that KML001 (sodium metaarsenite) displaces hTERT from the nucleus and is cytotoxic (Clin Cancer Res 14:4593-602, 2008). We have also demonstrated that it is synergistic with cisplatin. Methods: Pts with advanced solid tumors, PS 0-1, normal renal and hepatic function were eligible. Treatment was with CDDP 75 mg/m2 day 1 and KML p.o. daily days 1-14 on a 21 day cycle. It was planned that KML doses would be escalated by 2.5 mg beginning at 15 mg/day. A 3+3 design was employed. Blood specimens for arsenic and platinum pk were obtained at hours 0,1,2,3,4,5,6, 24 and day 15 and 22. Tumor blocks were required to assess for telomerase expression. Results: 18 patients (7M,11F) are evaluable for toxicity. Pts were heavily pretreated (median number of prior regimens =3). 16 had prior platinum therapy. The dose limiting toxicity was QTc interval prolongation seen in three patients in cohort 3 (20 mg) (two during cycle 1, one during cycle 2). A PR was seen in a patient with heavily pretreated SCLC in cohort 1. 1 other pt with SCLC and 2 with NSCLC also experienced reduction in disease burden. 10/18 pts received >3 cycles of therapy. Other common toxicities observed were nausea, vomiting and cytopenias. Significant, but not dose limiting, neutropenia or thrombocytopenia (> grade 3) was observed in cohorts 1 and 2. Myelosuppression was primarily seen in pts with prior radiotherapy. Non-compartmental analysis for inorganic arsenic (iAs) and the mono (MAs) and dimethylarsenic (DMAs) metabolites was performed (Table). Conclusions: 1. The combination of KML-001 and CDDP is feasible and active. 2. We are currently evaluating CDDP 75 mg/m2 and KML 17.5 mg in an expansion cohorts of advanced SCLC and NSCLC. 3. Studies of telomerase expression are in progress. (R21CA130349-01) Clinical trial information: NCT01110226. [Table: see text]

A phase Ib study of the PI3Kδ inhibitor linperlisib in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3099-3099
Author(s):  
Jin Li ◽  
Nong Xu ◽  
Tianshu Liu ◽  
Jianjin Huang ◽  
Yongmei Yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Cell Functions ◽  
Potential Clinical Benefit ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

3099 Background: Phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) pathways are important elements of tumor survival and progression, and PIK3C genes are often mutated or overexpressed in many cancers. Additionally, PIK3D (PI3Kδ) modulates immune cell functions in tumors, elaborating another PI3Kδ inhibition feature with a potential clinical benefit. Linperlisib, an oral and highly selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, demonstrated potent anti-tumor activity in syngeneic animals from previous research. In this Phase 1b study, the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of linperlisib is under investigation for patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Linperlisib was given orally once daily (QD) in 28-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from the study. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v5.0. Efficacy was assessed according to RECIST1.1 criteria. Results: As of December 28, 2020, 70 patients were enrolled in the Phase1b study, with advanced cancers, including colorectal (n = 22), breast (n = 8), lung (n = 8), kidney (n = 5), liver (n = 4), ovarian (n = 1), head and neck (n = 5), and esophageal (n = 1) cancers; sarcomas, (n = 4), small intestinal stromal tumor (n = 3), thymic (n = 2), gallbladder (n = 2), gastric (n = 4), and pancreatic (n = 1) carcinomas. The patients were heavily pretreated with an average of 4 previous lines of therapy. Among the 70 patients, the most common nonhematologic TEAEs (all grades/grade≥3) were proteinuria (37.14%/0%), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (20%/0%), nausea (20%/0%), oral mucositis (2.8%/2.8%), diarrhea (2.8%/2.8%). The most common hematological TEAEs were leukopenia (24.28%/0%) and neutropenia (17.14%/4.28%). There were no unexpected toxicities in this study. Of 42 patients evaluable for response, the overall response rate was 2.38%. Notably, the disease control rate (DCR) was 45.24% from monotherapy treatment. One patient with thymic carcinoma obtained a partial response (80.8% reduction of the target lesion), with a duration of response of more than 6 cycles. The treatment of this subject is continuing. A lung adenocarcinoma subject reached radiological stable disease associated with 13.7% reduction in the target lesion and disease control for approximately 6 months. Conclusions: In this study, the PI3K inhibitor, linperlisib exhibited a favorable safety profile as was previously seen in lymphoma patients. Monotherapy treatment with linperlisib was observed to impart a high DCR in advanced solid cancers of many types. Available data from linperlisib and other PI3K inhibitors suggests that linperlisib may limit tumor growth directly, but also by affecting the tumor immune microenvironment. With these promising indications of clinical tolerability and activity, further investigation of linperlisib alone or in key therapeutic combinations is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT04049929.

Glufosfamide (GLU) plus gemcitabine (GEM) in advanced solid tumors: Phase 1 results

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14022-14022
Author(s):  
E. G. Chiorean ◽  
T. Dragovich ◽  
J. T. Hamm ◽  
V. K. Langmuir ◽  
S. Kroll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Isophosphoramide Mustard ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types

14022 Background: Glufosfamide is glucose linked to isophosphoramide mustard, the active metabolite of ifosfamide. Cancer cells use glucose at a higher rate than normal cells, which may lead to preferential metabolic targeting by GLU. GLU has shown activity in patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer in Phase 1/2 studies with the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) being nephrotoxicity and neutropenia. The MTD was 4500 mg/m2. In preclinical studies, GLU has shown additive activity when combined with GEM. The objectives of this study are to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate the safety, efficacy and PK of GLU + GEM in advanced solid tumors. Methods: Eligible pts had Karnofsky Performance Status ≥70, no prior GEM, at least one lesion by RECIST, creatinine clearance (CrCL) ≥60 mL/min and acceptable hematologic and liver function. Cohorts of 3–6 patients were treated with GLU 1500–4500 mg/m2 IV over 4 hours on Day 1 and GEM 1000 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of every 28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles. CT scans were obtained every 8 weeks. Detailed PK sampling was performed. Results: Nineteen pts with pancreatic (8), gall bladder (4) and other (7) cancers were enrolled. Two DLTs have occurred: Grade 3 fatigue at 2500 mg/m2 and Grade 4 thrombocytopenia at 4500 mg/m2. Both cohorts were expanded. No DLTs occurred in the 1500 or 3500 mg/m2 cohorts. Three pts completed all 6 cycles and 3 pts continue on study. Reasons for early discontinuation were progressive disease (10), clinical deterioration (1), AE (1) and death (1). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 7 pts (5 during Cycle 1) and Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 5 pts (2 during Cycle 1). The CrCL fell below 60 mL/min in one patient. No objective tumor responses have been reported; 10 of 18 (56%) evaluable pts had stable disease (SD) at 8 weeks, including 1 pt with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer with ongoing SD after 8 months on therapy. PK analyses suggest no interaction between GLU and GEM. Conclusions: Phase 1 data indicate that full dose GLU (4500 mg/m2) can be given safely in combination with GEM. Both early and delayed Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia have been observed. A Phase 2 cohort of 28 pts with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is currently enrolling. Studies with GEM/GLU in other tumor types are planned. [Table: see text]

A QTc study of cabazitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 257-257
Author(s):  
James Lloyd Wade ◽  
Shaker R. Dakhil ◽  
Ari David Baron ◽  
Sylvie Rottey ◽  
Frederick E. Millard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Qtc Interval ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

257 Background: Cabazitaxel (Cbz) improves overall survival in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after docetaxel failure, compared with mitoxantrone (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.59–0.83; P < 0.0001). Following Cbz approval for the treatment of mCRPC, this study was undertaken to evaluate any effect of Cbz on the QTc interval. Methods: This prospective, multinational, open-label study ( NCT01087021 ) enrolled pts with advanced solid tumors (without other therapeutic options). Cbz 25 mg/m² IV was administered on Day 1 Q3W. QTc and other ECG intervals were assessed on Day 1 of Cycle 1. Triplicate ECGs were obtained from 12-lead Holter recordings and concomitant serial blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the corrected QTc interval (according to the Fridericia formula QTcF). Results: A total of 96 pts were enrolled; 32 pts under the original protocol (6-h Holter) and 64 pts following protocol amendment 1, which extended ECG and PK monitoring (24-h Holter). Median age was 63 yrs (69.8% male), 30.5% and 57.9% of pts were ECOG PS 0 and 1 respectively; 33 pts (34.4%) had prostate cancer. Screening ECG was abnormal but not clinically significant in 39.6% of pts. The majority (n = 65) of pts received ≥ 3 treatment cycles; safety and ECG parameters were evaluated in 95 and 94 pts, respectively. In the 24-h Holter group (n = 63), the maximum least squares (LS) mean change from baseline in QTcF was 4.8 msec (90% CI 2.1–7.5), returning to baseline by 24 h. Similar results were observed in the overall population (n = 94). At Cmax, Cbz concentration had no effect on QTcF change from baseline; the mean (CV%) Cmax (n = 91) and AUC (n = 92) were 276 ng/ml (63%) and 1245 ng.h/ml (82%). The LS mean change from baseline in heart rate increased up to 24 h but remained < 10 beats per minute. The most common Grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (27.4%), febrile neutropenia (12.6%), fatigue (12.6%) and dehydration (5.3%). No Grade 3/4 cardiac AEs were reported. Of the 6 deaths reported, 1 (infection) was study drug related. Conclusions: Cbz had no significant effect on QTc interval in pts with advanced tumors. The Cbz safety profile is consistent with previous findings and with other taxane-based therapies.

Phi-53: (NCI#7251): Phase I trial of belinostat (PXD101) in combination with 13-cis-retinoic acid (13c-RA) in advanced solid tumor malignancies—A California Cancer Consortium NCI/CTEP sponsored trial.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2526-2526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thehang H. Luu ◽  
Paul Henry Frankel ◽  
Dean Lim ◽  
Mihaela C. Cristea ◽  
Jan Hendrik Beumer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Qtc Interval ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3

2526 Background: Belinostat has a reported maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 1,000 mg/m2 given days 1 to 5 every 21 days as a single agent, although in one study in hepatocellular carcinoma belinostat was given at 1,400 mg/m2on the same schedule. Pre-clinical evidence suggests HDAC inhibitors enhance retinoic acid signaling with a synergistic impact in a variety of solid tumors. We conducted a phase I study of belinostat and 13c-RA in advanced solid tumors. Methods: Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as cycle 1 hematologic toxicity: ≥grade 3 that not resolved to <grade 1 within 1 week or non-hematologic toxicity: ≥grade 3. We sought the MTD of belinostat days 1-5 with 13-cRA days 1-14, every 21 days, in patients (pt) with advanced solid tumors. Eligibility criteria included normal organ function and QT/QTc interval; 4 weeks from previous therapy. Results: 51 pt were treated: median age 61 (range 40-80); 29 men; 57% ECOG 0, 41% ECOG 1, 2% ECOG 2; 13 lung, 11 breast, 8 colorectal, 3 pancreatic. 11 dose levels (DL) were tested starting from belinostat 600 mg/m2/day and 13c-RA 50 mg/m2/day to belinostat 2000 mg/m2/day and 13c-RA 100 mg/m2/day. Only two DLTs were observed: a grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction with dizziness and hypoxia at DL 8 (belinostat 1700 mg/m2/day, 13c-RA 100 mg/m2/day); and a grade 3 allergic reaction in a patient with an ECOG PS 2 at DL 11 (belinostat 2000 mg/m2/day, 13c-RA 100 mg/m2/day). The MTD was not reached. Pharmacokinetics of belinostat suggests dose proportionality. Median number of cycles: 2 (range 1–56). 10 patients had SD including: 1 neuroendocrine pancreatic stable for 56 cycles; 1 breast pt for 12 cycles; 1 lung pt 8 cycles. 2 pt had PRs: a keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (tonsil) and a lung cancer pt. Conclusions: Belinostat 2000 mg/m2 days 1-5and 13-cis-Retinoic acid 100 mg/m2days 1-14, every 21 days, was well-tolerated and an MTD was not reached despite doubling the established single agent MTD. Future studies building on this combination to belinostat are warranted. Support: U01CA062505 and P30CA033572 (City of Hope); U01CA099168 and P30CA047904 (University of Pittsburgh).

Absence of interaction of cabazitaxel on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam: Results of a drug–drug interaction study in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 126-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Rixe ◽  
John Sarantopoulos ◽  
Chung-Tsen Hsueh ◽  
A. Craig Lockhart ◽  
Sharona Ross ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Hepatic Function ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Fixed Sequence ◽  
Normal Hepatic Function ◽  
Grade 3

126 Background: Cabazitaxel (Cbz) is approved in combination with prednisone/prednisolone for the treatment of men with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer previously treated with a docetaxel-containing treatment regimen. In vitro studies showed that Cbz is mainly metabolized through CYP3A, resulting in inhibition of this family of enzymes. Midazolam (Mdz) is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4. We aimed to determine the effect of Cbz on CYP3A activity by comparing the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of Mdz when administered alone and following co-administration with Cbz. Methods: An ongoing safety and PK study of Cbz in patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors and varying degrees of hepatic impairment (NCT01140607) included a cohort with normal hepatic function to assess the effect of a single Cbz dose on the PK profile of a single dose of Mdz. This was an open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence study in patients aged between 45 and 60 years with advanced solid tumors and normal hepatic function. A single dose of Mdz (2 mg) was administered orally alone (Day –1) and at the end of a 1-hour infusion of Cbz (25 mg/m2) (Day 1), with a 24-hour interval between the two administrations of Mdz. Endpoints included AUC and AUClastof Mdz with and without Cbz administration, and safety evaluations. Results: Of the 13 patients enrolled and treated in the cohort, 11 patients were included in the PK analysis. Exposure (AUC and AUClast) and other PK parameters after a single administration of Mdz alone and in combination with Cbz (Day 1) were similar. The AUC ratio for Mdz administered alone or with Cbz was 0.97 (90% CI: 0.76–1.23). The AUClast ratio for Mdz administered alone or with Cbz was 1.04 (90% CI: 0.81–1.34). All 13 patients had ≥1 adverse event (AE), 11 (84.6%) experienced a Grade 3–4 AE, and 4 (30.8%) experienced a serious AE. The majority of Grade 3–4 AEs were haematological and no new or unexpected safety findings were observed. Conclusions: In this study, Cbz did not increase the plasma exposure of Mdz. This indicates that Cbz is not a CYP3A inhibitor in the clinical setting and can be administered in combination with drugs metabolized by CYP3A. Clinical trial information: NCT01140607.

A phase I study of a novel MDM2 antagonist APG-115 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3126-3126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Drew W. Rasco ◽  
Nehal J. Lakhani ◽  
Yufeng Li ◽  
Lichuang Men ◽  
Hengbang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Mdm2 Protein ◽  
Mdm2 Antagonist ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Suppressive Function

3126 Background: APG-115 is a potent and orally active small-molecule MDM2 protein inhibitor. Binding to MDM2 protein, APG-115 restores p53 tumor suppressive function via induction of apoptosis in tumor cells retaining wild-type p53. In addition, enhanced antitumor activity was demonstrated in the syngeneic tumor models after APG-115 combined with PD-1 blockade. Methods: This Phase I study (APG-115-US-001) was designed to enroll the patients with advanced solid tumors in US (NCT02935907). Study objectives included to assess safety, dose limited toxicity (DLT), pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and antitumor activity (assessed every 8 weeks per RECIST v1.1). The patients received APG-115 orally every other day (QOD) at the designated dose (ranging from 10 to 300 mg) for first 21 days of a 28-day cycle, until disease progression. Results: Up until Jan 4 2019, total 28 patients were treated with APG-115 at various doses (one patient at 10mg, 20mg and 50mg, respectively; 14 patients at 100mg, 6 patients at 200mg, and 5 patients at 300mg). The median number of prior systemic anticancer therapies was 4 (range 0-15). The DLTs were observed during cycle 1, including one grade 2 thrombocytopenia at 200mg, one grade 3 thrombocytopenia at 300mg, and one grade 3 fatigue at 100mg and 300mg respectively. The most common AEs (reported in ≥10% of pts) included: fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, decreased appetite, dehydration, neutrophil count decreased, white blood cell count decreased, pain in extremity, thrombocytopenia. The most common Grade 3 or 4 treatment related AEs were fatigue (10.7%), and thrombocytopenia (10.7%). Six patients had stable disease (SD) after two cycle treatments, two of them are continuing in this study. PK analyses indicated that exposure (Cmax and AUC) generally increases with the increase of dose level from 20 mg to 300 mg. Conclusions: APG-115 was well tolerated and had manageable adverse events. The MTD/RP2D of APG-115 monotherapy with oral administration, QOD for 21 days of a 28-day cycle for treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors was determined as 100 mg. Further evaluation of APG-115 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02935907.

A phase I trial combining motexafin gadolinium (MGd) with docetaxel in the treatment of advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13115-13115
Author(s):  
K. J. Pandya ◽  
S. Phan
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Foot Drop ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Motexafin Gadolinium ◽  
Grade 3

13115 Background: MGd is a novel therapeutic agent that concentrates in tumors and generates reactive oxygen species. Pre-clinical models show that MGd enhances in tumors the cytotoxic activity of selected chemotherapies, including taxanes. This phase I trial studied the combination of MGd and docetaxel. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors, adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function were eligible. Cohorts of 3 pts were treated with MGd starting at 2.5 mg/kg followed 30 minutes later by docetaxel 75 mg/m2. Treatments were repeated q3wks. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MGd in combination with docetaxel on this schedule and to determine the dose limiting toxicities (DLT). The secondary objective was to evaluate the response rate. MGd dose was escalated in successive cohorts while docetaxel dose remained fixed. Results: Sixteen pts were entered (9 males, 7 females) at MGd dose of 2.5 to 10 mg/kg. The median age was 60.5 yrs (range 35 -75). ECOG PS0 (4), 1 (14). Diagnoses included prostate (1); ovarian (2); breast (2) and non-small cell lung (NSCLC) (11). Median number of prior chemotherapy regimens: 2 (range 1–14), 7 pts had previously received a taxane: paclitaxel 5, docetaxel 2. Reported toxicities (all grades) include urine discoloration from excretion of MGd (68%), fatigue (87%), diarrhea (81%) and nausea (56%), Grade 3 neutropenia (37.5%) febrile neutropenia (6%), neuropathy (foot drop) was seen in 1 patient, therefore additional pts were entered (4 registered, but 1 never treated) at 10 mg/kg dose. Recurrence of prior radiation esophagitis was seen in 1 pt therefore it was felt that DLT was reached and study was closed. Responses are as follows: PR by CT in 1 breast and 4 NSCLC, and by PSA in 1 prostate; SD by CT in 1 breast and 2 NSCLC. Conclusion: MGd 10 mg/kg in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 is feasible and did not increase docetaxel toxicity while showing promising responses. Phase II study of this combination is underway in NSCLC. [Table: see text]

A QTc study of cabazitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15115-e15115
Author(s):  
James Lloyd Wade ◽  
Shaker R. Dakhil ◽  
Ari David Baron ◽  
Sylvie Rottey ◽  
Frederick E. Millard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Interval Methods ◽  
Qtc Interval ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

e15115 Background: Cabazitaxel (Cbz) improves overall survival in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after docetaxel failure, compared with mitoxantrone (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.59–0.83; p<0.0001). Following Cbz approval for the treatment of mCRPC, this study was undertaken to evaluate any effect of Cbz on the QTc interval. Methods: This prospective, multinational, open-label study (NCT01087021) enrolled pts with advanced solid tumors (without other therapeutic options). Cbz 25 mg/m² IV was administered on Day 1 Q3W. QTc and other ECG intervals were assessed on Day 1 of Cycle 1. Triplicate ECGs were obtained from 12-lead Holter recordings and concomitant serial blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the corrected QTc interval (according to the Fridericia formula [QTcF]). Results: A total of 96 pts were enrolled; 32 pts under the original protocol (6-h Holter) and 64 pts following protocol amendment 1, which extended ECG and PK monitoring (24-h Holter). Median age was 63 yrs (69.8% male), 30.5% and 57.9% of pts were ECOG PS 0 and 1 respectively; 33 pts (34.4%) had prostate cancer. Screening ECG was abnormal but not clinically significant in 39.6% of pts. The majority (n=65) of pts received ≥ 3 treatment cycles; safety and ECG parameters were evaluated in 95 and 94 pts, respectively. In the 24-h Holter group (n=63), the maximum least squares (LS) mean change from baseline in QTcF was 4.8 msec (90% CI 2.1–7.5), returning to baseline by 24 h. Similar results were observed in the overall population (n=94). At Cmax, Cbz concentration had no effect on QTcF change from baseline; the mean (CV%) Cmax (n=91) and AUC (n=92) were 276 ng/ml (63%) and 1245 ng.h/ml (82%). The LS mean change from baseline in heart rate increased up to 24 h but remained < 10 beats per minute. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (27.4%), febrile neutropenia (12.6%), fatigue (12.6%) and dehydration (5.3%). No grade 3/4 cardiac AEs were reported. Of the 6 deaths reported, 1 (infection) was study drug related. Conclusions: Cbz had no significant effect on QTc interval in pts with advanced tumors. The Cbz safety profile is consistent with previous findings and with other taxane-based therapies.

An open-label expanded-access study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with advanced solid tumors and hepatic impairment.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2559-2559
Author(s):  
Wasif M. Saif ◽  
Lee S. Rosen ◽  
Michelle A. Rudek ◽  
Weijing Sun ◽  
Dale Randall Shepard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Hepatic Impairment ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Hepatic Function ◽  
Moderate Hepatic Impairment ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Impaired Hepatic Function ◽  
Grade 3

2559 Background: The Phase 3 RECOURSE study showed that trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) was effective in the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (Mayer et al. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1909-19). A Phase 1 open-label study evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of FTD/TPI in patients with advanced solid tumors and varying degrees of hepatic impairment to inform dosing recommendations for these patients. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with advanced solid tumors, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, normal hepatic function, and mild, moderate, or severe impaired hepatic function according to the National Cancer Institute criteria were enrolled. Patients received FTD/TPI 35 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-5 and days 8-12 of each 28-day cycle, except for those with severe impaired hepatic function (dose was to be determined). Results: 24 patients were enrolled to normal (n=8), mild (n=10), and moderate (n=6) groups. Study enrollment was stopped as 5/6 patients in the moderate group experienced elevated bilirubin levels (grade ≥3). The other baseline characteristics were similar across groups. Overall, 12 patients (50%) had at least 1 adverse event leading to study discontinuation: 2 in normal, 5 in mild, and 5 in the moderate hepatic impairment groups. Pharmacokinetic results are summarized in the table. Conclusions: The exposure to FTD or TPI was not increased by hepatic impairment and the patients who experienced grade 3 and 4 increased total bilirubin were not overexposed to FTD or TPI. Clinical trial information: NCT02301104. [Table: see text]

287 Safety and antitumor activity of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO-1) inhibitor KHK2455 in combination with anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody mogamulizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A313-A314
Author(s):  
Solmaz Sahebjam ◽  
Jameel Muzaffar ◽  
Timothy Yap ◽  
David Hong ◽  
Olivier Rixe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dependent

BackgroundIDO-1 inhibitors have shown antitumor activity in combination with immunotherapeutic agents in multiple cancers. KHK2455 is a novel and selective oral IDO-1 inhibitor. KHK2455 inhibits IDO-1 apo-enzyme, with long-lasting and potent activity. Mogamulizumab is an anti-C-C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) monoclonal antibody that has shown synergy with KHK2455 in preclinical models. Mogamulizumab is approved in the US and EU for treatment of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.MethodsIn this first-in-human study, patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating oral doses of KHK2455 alone (0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30 and 100 mg once daily) for 4 weeks (Cycle 0), followed by combination with 1 mg/kg weekly of IV mogamulizumab for 4 weeks (Cycle 1), and then on Days 1 and 15 (from Cycle 2 onward) in a standard 3+3 Phase I design. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and IDO activity (kynurenine [Kyn] and tryptophan [Trp] levels and ex vivo Kyn production) were evaluated.ResultsThirty-six patients were enrolled across all cohorts. One patient with lower esophageal cancer in the 100 mg cohort exhibited dose-limiting toxicity (Grade 3 gastrointestinal necrosis). The most frequent (≥10%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are presented in table 1. Overall numbers of TEAEs, ≥Grade 3 TEAEs, and serious TEAEs related to KHK2455 and mogamulizumab are presented in table 2. Serious KHK2455-related TEAEs included gastrointestinal necrosis (KHK2455 monotherapy), and nausea and drug eruption (combination therapy). In addition, five drug-related TEAEs in combination therapy led to discontinuation; there were no fatal outcomes related to either study drug. Plasma KHK2455 concentrations reached steady state by Day 8 (Cycle 0) and increased dose-dependently. Potent dose-dependent inhibition of IDO activity was demonstrated by plasma Kyn concentration and Kyn/Trp ratio (median inhibition 70.5% and 70.8%, respectively, at 100 mg dose on Day 15, compared to baseline) and ex vivo Kyn production (>95% inhibition at ≥10 mg KHK2455), confirming target modulation. Six of 26 evaluable patients from all dosing groups achieved durable disease stabilization (≥6 months, RECIST 1.1), and one patient with bevacizumab-resistant glioblastoma demonstrated confirmed partial response (43.5% tumor reduction over a 2-year observation period). Median overall survival was 13.4 months, with 30% of subjects surviving for 2 years or longer (figure 1).Abstract 287 Table 1Study 2455-001: Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (≥10% by Preferred Term)Abstract 287 Table 2Abstract 287 Figure 1Study 2455-001: Overall SurvivalConclusionsKHK2455 in combination with mogamulizumab was well-tolerated and manageable at all doses tested, suppressed Kyn production in a dose-dependent and sustained manner, and demonstrated signals of antitumor activity. These data support the continued development of this combination.AcknowledgementsMedical writing assistance was provided by Susan E. Johnson, PhD, S.E. Johnson Consulting, LLC, New Hope, PA, USA.Trial RegistrationNCT02867007 (www.clinicaltrials.gov)Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by Ethics Committees at all participating study institutions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document