A randomized clinical trial of chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy in combination with cetuximab in k-RAS wild-type patients with operable metastases from colorectal cancer: The new EPOC study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3504-3504 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Neil Primrose ◽  
Stephen Falk ◽  
Meg Finch-Jones ◽  
Juan W. Valle ◽  
David Sherlock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Egf Receptor ◽  
Primary Tumour ◽  
Data Monitoring Committee ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Free Survival

3504 Background: Resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care. The EPOC study (Nordlinger et al, Lancet 2008) randomised patients between surgery and surgery with chemotherapy and demonstrated an improvement in 3 year progression free survival (PFS) of 7·3% (from 28·1% to 35·4%). As a rational extension to the EPOC study data, the New EPOC study evaluates the benefit of cetuximab, an EGF receptor antibody, in addition to standard chemotherapy in patients with operable liver metastases. Methods: 272 patients were randomised between February 2007 and November 2012 into the New EPOC study. Eligible patients were required to be k-RAS wild type, have operable liver metastases and to be sufficiently fit for chemotherapy and surgery. Patients with the primary tumour in situ, and those who required short course rectal radiation were eligible. Patients were randomised to receive a fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin plus or minus cetuximab for 12 weeks before, then 12 weeks following surgery. Patients who had been treated with adjuvant oxaliplatin could receive irinotecan and 5 – fluorouracil. Results: Following a recommendation from the Independent Data Monitoring Committee on 19/11/2012, the New EPOC study was stopped when the study met a protocol pre-defined futility analysis. With 45.3% (96/212) of the expected events observed, progression free survival was significantly worse in the cetuximab arm (14.8 vs 24.2 months, HR (95%CI) 1.50037 (1.000707 to 2.249517) p< 0.048). The result of a pre-planned analysis excluding the 23 patients treated with irinotecan based chemotherapy was similar (15.2 vs 24.2 months, HR 1.565546 (1.014967-2.414793) P<0.043). Conclusions: Although the data are immature, the accumulation of more events is unlikely to change this result. In patients with resectable liver metastases and K-RAS wt tumours the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy is not beneficial. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN22944367.

scholarly journals FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer: final survival and per-protocol analysis of FIRE-3, a randomised clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Heinemann ◽  
Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal ◽  
Thomas Decker ◽  
Alexander Kiani ◽  
Florian Kaiser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Primary Tumour ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Exon 2 ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Protocol Population

Abstract Background Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI improved overall survival compared with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in FIRE-3, but no corresponding benefit was found for progression-free survival. This analysis aimed to determine whether cetuximab improves response and survival versus bevacizumab among response-evaluable patients receiving first-line FOLFIRI for RAS wild-type mCRC and the effect of primary tumour side on outcomes. Methods The intent-to-treat population included 593 patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type mCRC. Further testing identified 400 patients with extended RAS wild-type disease; of these, 352 (88%) who received ≥3 cycles of therapy and had ≥1 post-baseline scan were evaluable for response and constituted the per-protocol population (169 cetuximab and 183 bevacizumab). Patients received 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) with either weekly cetuximab or biweekly bevacizumab given on day 1 of each 14-day cycle until response, progression or toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) in the per-protocol population. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The effect of primary tumour location was evaluated. Results Median OS in the RAS wild-type population was 31 vs 26 months in the cetuximab and bevacizumab groups, respectively (HR 0.76, P = 0.012). In the per-protocol population, outcomes favoured cetuximab for ORR (77% vs 65%, P = 0.014) and median OS (33 vs 26 months, HR 0.75, P = 0.011), while PFS was comparable between groups. The advantage of cetuximab over bevacizumab occurred only in patients with left-sided primary tumours. Conclusions FOLFIRI plus cetuximab resulted in a significantly higher ORR and longer OS compared to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab among patients with left-sided tumours. The superior response associated with cetuximab may particularly benefit patients with symptomatic tumours or borderline-resectable metastases. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00433927.

scholarly journals Molecular subtype-specific efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer is dependent on the chemotherapy backbone

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanne ten Hoorn ◽  
Dirkje W. Sommeijer ◽  
Faye Elliott ◽  
David Fisher ◽  
Tim R. de Back ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Molecular Subtype ◽  
Primary Tumour ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tumour Location ◽  
Selection For

Abstract Background Patient selection for addition of anti-EGFR therapy to chemotherapy for patients with RAS and BRAF wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer can still be optimised. Here we investigate the effect of anti-EGFR therapy on survival in different consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) and stratified by primary tumour location. Methods Retrospective analyses, using the immunohistochemistry-based CMS classifier, were performed in the COIN (first-line oxaliplatin backbone with or without cetuximab) and PICCOLO trial (second-line irinotecan with or without panitumumab). Tumour tissue was available for 323 patients (20%) and 349 (41%), respectively. Results When using an irinotecan backbone, anti-EGFR therapy is effective in both CMS2/3 and CMS4 in left-sided primary tumours (progression-free survival (PFS): HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.26–0.75, P = 0.003 and HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04–0.36, P < 0.001, respectively) and in CMS4 right-sided tumours (PFS HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04–0.71, P = 0.02). Efficacy using an oxaliplatin backbone was restricted to left-sided CMS2/3 tumours (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36–0.96, P = 0.034). Conclusions The subtype-specific efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy is dependent on the chemotherapy backbone. This may provide the possibility of subtype-specific treatment strategies for a more optimal use of anti-EGFR therapy.

scholarly journals Primary Tumor Location Is a Prognostic Factor for Intrahepatic Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Undergoing Portal Vein Embolization as Preparation for Major Hepatic Surgery

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1638
Author(s):  
Lea Hitpass ◽  
Daniel Heise ◽  
Maximilian Schulze-Hagen ◽  
Federico Pedersoli ◽  
Florian Ulmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Portal Vein Embolization ◽  
Hepatic Metastases ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Right Hemihepatectomy

The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors affecting intrahepatic progression-free survival (ihPFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) undergoing portal vein embolization (PVE) and subsequent (extended) right hemihepatectomy. A total of 59 patients (mean age: 60.8 ± 9.3 years) with CRCLM who underwent PVE in preparation for right hemihepatectomy were included. IhPFS and OS after PVE were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression analyses were conducted to investigate the association between the following factors and survival: patient age, laterality of the colorectal cancer (right- versus left-sided), tumor location (colon versus rectal cancer), time of occurrence of hepatic metastases (synchronous versus metachronous), baseline number and size of hepatic metastases, presence or absence of metastases in the future liver remnant (FLR) before PVE, preoperative carcinoembryogenic antigen (CEA) levels, time between PVE and surgery, history of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, and the presence or absence of extrahepatic disease before PVE. Median follow up was 18 months. The median ihPFS was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval: 6.2–10.2 months), and median OS was 34.1 months (95% confidence interval: 27.3–40.9 months). Laterality of the primary colorectal cancer was the only statistically significant predictor of ihPFS after PVE (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.242; 95% confidence interval: 1.125, 4.465; p = 0.022), with patients with right-sided colorectal cancer having significantly shorter median ihPFS than patients with left-sided cancer (4.0 ± 1.9 months versus 10.2 ± 1.5 months; log rank test: p = 0.018). Other factors, in particular also the presence or absence of additional metastases in the FLR, were not associated with intrahepatic progression-free survival. The presence of extrahepatic disease was associated with worse OS (HR = 3.050, 95% confidence interval: 1.247, 7.459; p = 0.015).

scholarly journals Conversion Chemotherapy With a Modified FLOX Regimen for Borderline or Unresectable Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: An Alternative for Limited-Resources Settings

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Renata Colombo Bonadio ◽  
Paulo Henrique Amor Divino ◽  
Jorge Santiago Madero Obando ◽  
Karolina Cayres Alvino Lima ◽  
Débora Zachello Recchimuzzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Unresectable Liver Metastases

PURPOSE Conversion chemotherapy is often used for borderline or unresectable (B/U) liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) with the aim of achieving resectability. Although intensive and costly regimens are often used, the best regimen in this scenario remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with B/U liver metastases from CRC treated with conversion chemotherapy with the modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFLOX) regimen followed by metastasectomy. METHODS We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with B/U liver metastases from CRC treated with chemotherapy with the mFLOX regimen followed by surgery. B/U disease was defined as at least one of the following: more than four lesions, involvement of hepatic artery or portal vein, or involvement of biliary structure. RESULTS Fifty-four consecutive patients who met our criteria for B/U liver metastases were evaluated. Thirty-five patients (64%) had more than four liver lesions, 16 (29%) had key vascular structure involvement, and 16 (29%) had biliary involvement. After chemotherapy, all patients had surgery and 42 (77%) had R0 resection. After a median follow-up of 37.2 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.9 months and median overall survival (OS) was 68.3 months. R1-R2 resections were associated with worse PFS and OS compared with R0 resection (PFS: hazard ratio, 2.65; P = .007; OS: hazard ratio, 2.90; P = .014). CONCLUSION Treatment of B/U liver metastases from CRC with conversion chemotherapy using mFLOX regimen followed by surgical resection was associated with a high R0 resection rate and favorable survival outcomes. On the basis of our results, we consider mFLOX a low-cost option for conversion chemotherapy among other options that have been proposed.

Phase II study of combination chemotherapy with biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan for wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 561-561
Author(s):  
S. Yuki ◽  
K. Shitara ◽  
M. Yoshida ◽  
D. Takahari ◽  
S. Utsunomiya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Free Survival

561 Background: Weekly cetuximab and irinotecan is a standard regimen in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of combination chemotherapy with biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with pretreated MCRC harboring wild-type KRAS. Methods: Patients with wild- type KRAS MCRC that had progressed after chemotherapy with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidine were included in this study. Cetuximab was administered at 500 mg/m2 biweekly with irinotecan. The primary endpoint was response rate. The secondary endpoints included adverse events, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The pharmacokinetics of cetuximab was also evaluated in five patients. Results: From May, 2009 to February, 2010, a total of 31 patients were enrolled from five institutions. One patient was not eligible. Among the 30 assessable patients, ECOG PS was 0 in 12, 1 in 16, and 2 in two patients. The objective response rate was 30.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.7-49.4), and the disease control rate (complete response, partial response, or stable disease) was 76.7% (95%CI, 61.4-92.3). The median progression-free survival was 5.3 months (95%CI, 3.4-7.3). Grade 3 skin toxicity was observed in 3 patients (10%), and treatment related death due to pneumonia occurred in one patient. Conclusions: The efficacy data are similar to those of standard dose of cetuximab plus irinotecan. Combination chemotherapy with biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan is effective for pretreated metastatic wild-type KRAS MCRC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Down-regulation of KRAS-interacting miRNA-143 to predict prognosis and response to EGFR-targeted agents in colorectal cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14066-e14066
Author(s):  
Florian Eisner ◽  
Michael Stotz ◽  
Hellmut Samonigg ◽  
Sigurd Lax ◽  
Gerald Hoefler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Down Regulation ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Expression Levels

e14066 Background: MicroRNA-143 is frequently down-regulated in colorectal cancer (CRC) and influence CRC cell proliferation, apoptosis and sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil. mRNA encoded by the KRAS oncogene has been identified as a target of microRNA-143. However, the prognostic significance of microRNA-143 expression and the ability to predict the patient response to EGFR-targeted agents have not been explored yet. Methods: In this study, we analyzed 77 CRC harboring wild-type KRAS and obtaining treatment with the EGFR-targeting monoclonal antibodies cetuximab or panitumumab. MicroRNA-143 expression was measured by RT-PCR in both CRC and corresponding non-neoplastic colon tissue and the expression levels were correlated with clinico-pathological characteristics. Cancer-specific survival was calculated by uni- and multivariate analyses. The progression-free survival and objective response rates on EGFR-targeted therapy were also evaluated. Results: Down-regulation of microRNA-143 was observed in 47/77 (61%) CRC. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified low levels of microRNA-143 expression as an independent prognostic factor with respect to cancer-specific survival (HR=1.92, CI=1.1-3.4, p=0.024). A significant difference was observed with respect to progression-free survival on EGFR-targeted therapy (p=0.031, log-rank test), but there were no significant differences with regard to the objective response rate. Conclusions: Our data suggest that microRNA-143 expression levels serve as independent prognostic biomarker for KRAS wild-type CRC patients but not as predictor for EGFR-targeted therapy. In addition, we consider microRNA-143 as a potential drug target for future therapy of CRC.

Cost-effectiveness of front-line trials in metastatic colorectal cancer: Integrating the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) with the costs of drugs.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6622-6622
Author(s):  
Andrea Bonetti ◽  
Jcopo Giuliani
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Medical Oncology ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Cost

6622 Background: In Western Countries, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of death from cancer. In light of the relevant expenses of drugs it might be interesting to make a balance between the cost of the drugs and clinical parameters of interest such as progression free survival (PFS). Methods: Phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared at least two front-line chemotherapy regimens for mCRC patients were evaluated. Differences in PFS between the different arms were calculated and compared with the pharmacological costs (at the Pharmacy of our Hospital) needed to get one month of PFS. Subsequently we applied the ESMO-MCBS (a 1 to 5 scale) to the above phase III RCTs. Results: Overall 28 phase III RCTs, including 19 958 patients, were analyzed. The FOLFOX resulted the least expensive (56 € per month of PFS gained) while the addition of irinotecan to FOLFOX (FOLFOXIRI) increased only marginally the costs (90 € per month of PFS gained). Treatments including the monoclonal antibodies showed a cost per month of PFS gained of 2823 € (FOLFIRI with cetuximab in KRAS wild-type patients and liver-only metastases), of € 15 822 (FOLFOX with panitumumab in KRAS wild type) and of 13 383 € (FOLFOX with bevacizumab). According to the ESMO-MCBS the treatments including an EGFR-inhibitor (cetuximab or panitunumab) were associated with a score of 4 while the inclusion of bevacizumab reached a score of 3. The remaining phase III RCTs obtained a low (grade 1-2) score.Dividing the costs per month of PFS gained with the grade of ESMO-MCBS, for each RCTs, we obtained the costs of each point of ESMO-MCBS per month of PFS gained. FOLFOX was confirmed as being the least expensive (18.7 €) while among treatments including a targeted biological agent panitunumab in combination with FOLFOX in K-RAS wild type patients was less expensive (3955 €) than the combinations FOLFOX-bevacizumab (13 383 €) and FOLFIRI-cetuximab in K-RAS wild type patients (21 854.6 €). Conclusions: Our data demonstrate a huge difference in cost per month of PFS gained and per each point of the ESMO-MCBS in modern front line treatments in mCRC.

Hsa-miR-31-3p Expression Is Linked to Progression-free Survival in Patients with KRAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Anti-EGFR Therapy

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 3338-3347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Manceau ◽  
Sandrine Imbeaud ◽  
Raphaële Thiébaut ◽  
François Liébaert ◽  
Karine Fontaine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Free Survival

Cetuximab Plus Various Chemotherapy Regimens for Patients with KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Chemotherapy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Payam Azadeh ◽  
Nafiseh Mortazavi ◽  
Arezoo Tahmasebi ◽  
Farnaz Hosseini Kamal ◽  
Kambiz Novin
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The Other ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and hematologic toxicity of cetuximab combined with various types of chemotherapy regimens in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: The response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival of the patients were analyzed. Results: In total, 45 patients were included in the study. The overall response rate for the combination of cetuximab and FOLFOX, FOLFIRI and CAPOX was 20, 46 and 30%, respectively, but the differences were not statistically significant. The median PFS for the three groups were 8, 6 and 3.5 months, respectively, but again these differences were not significant. All-grade leukopenia and anemia for the cetuximab plus FOLFOX group were significantly higher than for the other chemotherapy regimens. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the combination of cetuximab and the three standard chemotherapy regimens resulted in the same outcomes in our patient population of mCRC, with higher hematologic toxicities among the FOLFOX subgroup.

scholarly journals PREMIUM: A French prospective multicenter observational study of factors impacting on efficacy and compliance to cetuximab treatment in first-line KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0243997
Author(s):  
L. Mineur ◽  
E. François ◽  
C. Plassot ◽  
J. M. Phelip ◽  
L. Miglianico ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Multicenter Observational Study ◽  
Ecog Ps

Background Cetuximab improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with KRAS wild type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Few data are available on factors impacting both efficacy and compliance to cetuximab treatment, which is, in combination with chemotherapy, a standard-of-care first-line treatment regimen for patients with KRAS wt mCRC. Patients and methods PREMIUM is a prospective, French multicenter, observational study that recruited patients with KRAS wt mCRC scheduled to receive cetuximab, with or without first-line chemotherapy, as part of routine clinical practice, between October 28, 2009 and April 5, 2012 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01756625). The main endpoints were the factors impacting on efficacy and compliance to cetuximab treatment. Predefined efficacy endpoints were PFS and safety. Results A total of 493 patients were recruited by 94 physicians. Median follow-up was 12.9 months. Median progression-free survival was 11 months [9.6–12]. In univariate analyses, ECOG performance status (PS), smoking status, primary tumor location, number of metastatic organs, metastasis resectability, surgery, folliculitis, xerosis and paronychia maximum grade, and acne preventive treatment were statistically significant. In multivariate analysis (Hazard Ratios of multivariate stepwise Cox models), ECOG PS, surgery, xerosis and folliculitis were positive prognostics factors for longer PFS. Among all patients, 69 (14%) were non-compliant. In multivariate analysis, no variables were statistically significant. The safety profile of cetuximab was consistent with previous studies. Conclusions ECOG PS <2, surgical treatment performed, and maximum grade xerosis or folliculitis developed were predictive factors of cetuximab efficacy on KRAS wt mCRC patients. Unfortunately, we failed in identifying predictive factors for compliance in these patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document