Quality of life and adverse drug reaction measured in patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 214-214
Author(s):  
Harminder Singh ◽  
Raja Banipal ◽  
Ritu Bala

214 Background: Cancer prevalence in India is estimated around 2.0-2.5 million, 0.7- 0.8 million new cases identified every year, and cancer deaths reported per year is 0.4-0.5 Million. The objective of this study was to analyze and compare patient-reported QoL (quality of life), and their physical/psychosocial symptom and adverse drug reaction in cancer patients. Methods: Study done by questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30. Comparison among 3 distinctive groups (G) (varied number of Chemotherapy cycles) was done. ADR measured appropriately Results: 131 patients were recruited and QoL scoring GHS (global health status) and 4 items of symptom scale i.e. insomnia, pain, appetite loss, constipation, and financial difficulties attained a significance difference. GHS significantly improved in G3 as compared to G1, indicating that the patient overall health improved as the chemotherapy sessions progressed. Female patients had more ADR (mean 3.2/person) and G3 had more ADR (mean 3.96). Conclusions: QoL score didn’t show significant improvement in all areas (except insomnia, pain, appetite loss, constipation & financial difficulties), a judicious diagnosis with an appropriate treatment including chemotherapy may lessen the negative perception of cancer. [Table: see text]

2010 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 270-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kean Fatt Ho ◽  
Damien J.J. Farnell ◽  
Jacqueline A. Routledge ◽  
Meriel P. Burns ◽  
Andrew J. Sykes ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
André L. Mihaljevic ◽  

Abstract Background The patient-reported outcomes (PRO) version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) and the computerized adaptive testing (CAT) version of the EORTC quality-of-life questionnaire QLQ-C30 have been proposed as new PRO measures in oncology; however, their implementation in patients undergoing cancer surgery has not yet been evaluated. Methods Patients undergoing elective abdominal cancer surgery were enrolled in a prospective multicenter study, and postoperative complications were recorded according to the Dindo–Clavien classification. Patients reported PRO data using the CAT EORTC QLQ-C30 and the PRO-CTCAE to measure 12 core cancer symptoms. Patients were followed-up for 6 months postoperatively. The study was carried out by medical students of the CHIR-Net SIGMA study network. Results Data of 303 patients were obtained and analyzed across 15 sites. PRO-CTCAE symptoms ‘poor appetite’, ‘fatigue’, ‘exhaustion’ and ‘sleeping problems’ increased after surgery and climaxed 10–30 days postoperatively. At 3–6 months postoperatively, no PRO-CTCAE symptom differed significantly to baseline. Patients reported higher ‘social functioning’ (p = 0.021) and overall quality-of-life scores (p < 0.05) 6 months after cancer surgery compared with the baseline level. There was a lack of correlation between postoperative complications or death and any of the PRO items evaluated. Feasibility endpoints for student-led research were met. Conclusion The two novel PRO questionnaires were successfully applied in surgical oncology. Postoperative complications do not affect health-reported quality-of-life or common cancer symptoms following major cancer surgery. The feasibility of student-led multicenter clinical research was demonstrated, but might be enhanced by improved student training.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 373
Author(s):  
Sophit Korpunsilp ◽  
Tipaporn Pongmesa

Objective: To assess quality of life (QoL) of female breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with a fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) regimen.Material and Method: This prospective analytical study was performed among 40 Thai female patients receiving the FAC regimen at Pranangklao Hospital, Nonthaburi province. Their QoL was assessed using the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Breast Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-BR23).Results: Most patients were aged 50 years or over (77.5%) and had been diagnosed with stage 2 breast cancer (47.5%). According to the EORTC QLQ-C30, the patients’ QoL significantly decreased compared to the baseline after cycle 3 for global health status (p-value=0.002) and QoL (p-value=0.001), as well as physical functioning (p-value=0.015) and role functioning (p-value=0.001), while symptoms of fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and appetite loss increased (p-value<0.001). After cycle 5, the patients’ QoL was still significantly lower than at baseline, for physical functioning (p-value=0.009) and symptoms of fatigue, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss (p-value<0.001) and dyspnea (p-value=0.005). The EORTC QLQ-BR23 reported significantly worse systemic therapy side effects for both cycles 3 and 5 (p-value<0.001), and distress due to hair loss also appeared after cycle 5 (p-value=0.016). No significant differences were revealed on any scales between cycles 3 and 5.Conclusion: The patients’ QoL significantly decreased after chemotherapy with the FAC regimen, with some side effects from treatment and reduction in some functioning.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2062-2062
Author(s):  
Monica Else ◽  
Alastair G. Smith ◽  
Sue M. Richards ◽  
Kim Cocks ◽  
Shirley Crofts ◽  
...  

Abstract There is little systematic information about the experience of patients with active untreated CLL and its impact on their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire we measured HRQoL in patients requiring first-line treatment for CLL, at the time of randomisation into the LRF CLL4 trial. Patients were scored 0–100 within each of 15 different domains. Tests of significance used were Mann-Whitney U-test (comparing 2 categories) or Kruskall-Wallis test (3 or more categories). Only p-values ≤0.01 are reported here. A difference between groups of ≥10 points was deemed clinically significant and is indicated below by an asterisk. 431 patients completed a baseline questionnaire before the start, or on the first day, of therapy. Of these 131 had Binet stage C disease, 186 stage B and 114 stage A-progressive. Stage A-progressive was defined by at least one of the following: persistent rise in lymphocyte count with doubling time &lt;12 months; a downward trend in hemoglobin and/or platelets; &gt;50% increase in the size of liver and/or spleen and/or lymph nodes, or appearance of these signs if not previously present; constitutional symptoms attributable to the disease. Hemoglobin &lt;11g/dl and Binet stage C were each associated with lower (poorer) HRQoL scores in physical (p&lt;0.001, p=0.001) and role (p&lt;0.001*, p=0.003*) functioning and global QoL (p=0.001, p=0.01) and with greater dyspnoea (p=0.001, p=0.001*). Hemoglobin &lt;11g/dl was also associated with poorer social functioning (p=0.01). Mean scores for Stage A-progressive were higher than for stage C but lower than stage B in all these domains and not significantly different from either, possibly due to the constitutional symptoms experienced by some patients in this group. Fatigue was reported by 81% of patients, compared to the next most common symptoms: insomnia (56%) and dyspnoea (49%). Hemoglobin &lt;11g/dl was associated with further increased fatigue (p=0.004), in addition to the effect of the disease itself. Women reported more insomnia than men (p=0.005*). Older age (≥70 years) was associated with lower physical functioning scores (p&lt;0.001) and fewer financial difficulties (p&lt;0.001*). Thrombocytopenia (platelets &lt;100×109/l) was only associated with dyspnoea (p=0.01*). There was no association between spleen, liver or lymph node enlargement, or lymphocytosis, and HRQoL. No other significant differences between groups were found in any HRQoL domain, including emotional and cognitive functioning, nausea and vomiting, pain, appetite loss, constipation and diarrhea. Patients classified as stage C because of thrombocytopenia alone did not have different scores in any domain compared to stage A-progressive and B patients. On the other hand, stage C patients with hemoglobin &lt;10g/dl had significantly lower scores than stage A-progressive and B patients in physical (p&lt;0.001*), role (p=0.001*) and social (p=0.01) functioning and global QoL (p=0.001*) and more dyspnoea (p=0.003*). The highest mean HRQoL scores, and the least fatigue and dyspnoea, were seen in stage B patients with hemoglobin ≥12g/dl. These findings confirm the need to begin treatment for CLL when haemoglobin levels fall in order to improve quality of life for patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 3813-3818
Author(s):  
Thenmozhi P ◽  
Simeon I

Quality of life is a significant part of patient care among cancer patients. Toxicities and adverse impacts of chemotherapy influence personal satisfaction in disease patients, and it likewise makes challenges in satisfying family and social jobs. Hence the study aimed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Cross-sectional research design was employed with 50 samples which matched the inclusion criteria were selected by convenience sampling technique. Demographic variables data were collected by using a structured questionnaire followed by assessing the quality of life by using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The findings of the study revealed the highest median value in the cognitive functioning, social functioning, role functioning and also in physical functioning compared symptom scale and in which the lowest score in the symptoms of nausea & vomiting, loss of craving, fatigue, diarrhea and constipation and face many challenges related to finance. Based on findings, further studies can be conducted to correlate the quality of life with clinical assessment and focus on the mind-body exercise such as yoga, meditation and physical therapy like exercise, massage to enhance the quality of life and to complete the entire cycle of chemotherapy.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4605-4605
Author(s):  
David Grinblatt ◽  
Mohit Narang ◽  
James Malone ◽  
David Sweet

Abstract Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of myeloid neoplasms characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and peripheral cytopenias. Treatment decisions are often based on age, performance status (PS), cytopenias, International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) classification, and MDS subtype. Patient-reported results from a few clinical trials suggest that MDS can have a negative effect on a patient’s quality of life (QoL) with responses to treatment having a positive effect. Azacitidine (Vidaza) is a hypomethylating agent approved in the US for the treatment of MDS. In a phase III study, patients (pts) treated with azacitidine experienced significantly greater improvement in QoL compared with supportive care (Kornblith AB, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2441). Evaluation of QoL in MDS pts treated in community-based hematology clinics is not well characterized. Azacitidine is approved for a dosing schedule of 75 mg/m2/day x 7 day q 28 days. However, the dose and schedule of azacitidine used in clinical practice varies. AVIDA is a unique, longitudinal, multicenter patient registry designed to prospectively collect data from community-based hematology clinics on the natural history and management of pts with MDS and other hematologic disorders, including acute myeloid leukemia, who are treated with azacitidine. It aims to further the understanding of current azacitidine treatment patterns in the community, identify common care procedures and concomitant treatments, explore correlation between duration and number of treatment cycles with ongoing clinical response, and to investigate the effect of azacitidine on patient satisfaction and QoL. Patient-reported QoL will be based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire with QoL measures obtained at baseline and at quarterly intervals for 2 years. Scores on the EORTC QLQ-C30 range from 0 to 100. Higher scores on the global health and functioning scales indicate better QoL in each measure/domain. Lower scores on the symptom and single-item scales indicate less impairment due to that symptom/single item. To date, 47 pts (34 males, 13 females; mean age, 73.2 years) with predominantly low-risk MDS have been enrolled in the registry. The majority (90%) is white and has an ECOG PS of 0 or 1. Median time from first MDS diagnosis is 2.2 months (mean, 14 months); 43 have primary and 4 have secondary MDS. IPSS is known for 36 pts; low for 8 pts, intermediate-1 for 21 pts, intermediate-2 for 6 pts, and high for 1 patient. Baseline QoL data are currently available for 42 pts. At baseline, pts reported a lower level (mean score) of global health (52), physical functioning (66) and role functioning (61) compared with cognitive (81), emotional (76), and social (71) functioning. Among the symptom/single item scales, fatigue scored the worst with a mean score of 48. Other symptom/single item scales that indicated pts were experiencing a moderate level of the measure included dyspnea (37), insomnia (29), and pain (22). Constipation (17), appetite loss (15), financial difficulties (15), and nausea/vomiting (8) were reported at lower levels. Ongoing results from this patient registry will provide insight into the QoL of pts with MDS and other hematologic malignancies in the real-world setting, and will explore any change in QoL associated with treatment and/or disease progression.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20070-e20070
Author(s):  
Vincent Lin ◽  
Bhagyashree Oak ◽  
Julia Snider ◽  
Josh Epstein

e20070 Background: CAR T therapy is being investigated as 2nd line therapy in RR-DLBCL. To evaluate its impact on patients’ HRQOL, it is essential to understand the HRQOL of patients receiving current standard of care (SOC) therapy for DLBCL and NHL patients. Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) of studies reporting HRQOL in RR-DLBCL patients was conducted in March 2019 (updated to include RR-NHL in May 2019) using EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane (all from 2007), Northern Light and International Society for Quality of Life Research abstracts (both from 2017). A targeted literature review (TLR) for untreated or 1st line patients was conducted in July 2019 using PubMed. Search terms included diseases, lines of therapy and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Abstracts and publications were screened for eligibility and data were extracted. Results: Of the 977 publications screened for the SLR, 26 met the inclusion criteria. Another 18 studies were included from the TLR. The most commonly used PRO measures were the SF-36 (10 studies), EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-Lym (8 studies each). The EORTC QLQ-C30 showed statistically significant or clinically meaningful changes in a greater number of domains (86%) than the FACT-Lym (75%) and SF-36 (62%). Additional results in table. Conclusions: While research is limited, RR-DLBCL patients receiving current SOC therapy report decreases in HRQOL and health utility. Further research is needed on how existing and future therapies may affect HRQOL among RR-DLBCL patients. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4039-4039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Kopetz ◽  
Axel Grothey ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Rona Yaeger ◽  
Harpreet Singh Wasan ◽  
...  

4039 Background: In the BEACON CRC study, the triplet regimen of encorafenib (ENCO) + binimetinib (BINI) + cetuximab (CETUX) significantly improved overall survival (OS, HR:0.52, P < 0.0001) and objective response rates (ORR, 26% vs 2%, P < 0.0001) in patients (pts) with BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) compared with current standard of care. This analysis focuses on the patient-reported quality of life (QOL) assessments from this study. Methods: The BEACON CRC study was a randomized, open-label, 3-arm, phase 3 global study which evaluated triplet (ENCO+BINI+CETUX) or doublet (ENCO+CETUX) vs. investigator’s choice of irinotecan + CETUX or FOLFIRI + CETUX in pts with BRAFV600E mCRC. QOL assessments (secondary endpoints in the trial) included the EORTC QOL Questionnaire (QLQ C30), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Colon Cancer (FACT C), EuroQol 5D 5L, and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). The primary assessment for the QOL variables was the time to definitive 10% deterioration. The study is ongoing. Results: 665 pts were randomly assigned to receive either triplet (n = 224), doublet (n = 220), or control (n = 221). Reduction in the risk of QOL deterioration was an estimated 45% (HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.70) and 52% (HR 0., 9485% CI: 0.38, 0.62) in EORTC QLQ C30 and FACT C assessments, respectively, in favor of the triplet regimen over control. For the doublet vs. control, reduction in risk of QOL deterioration was an estimated 46% (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.69) and 54% (HR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.59) in EORTC QLQ C30 and FACT C, respectively in favor of the doublet. Similar results were observed in EuroQol 5D 5L and PGIC assessments. There were no overall differences in QOL between triplet and doublet across the 4 instruments. Conclusions: In BEACON CRC, triplet and doublet demonstrated substantial improvement in patient-reported QOL assessments over the current standard of care in pts with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic CRC whose disease had progressed after 1 or 2 prior regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT02928224 .


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Kopetz ◽  
Axel Grothey ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Rona Yaeger ◽  
Harpreet Singh Wasan ◽  
...  

8 Background: In the BEACON CRC study, the triplet regimen of encorafenib (ENCO) + binimetinib (BINI) + cetuximab (CETUX) significantly improved overall survival (OS, HR:0.52, P < 0.0001) and objective response rates (ORR, 26% vs 2%, P < 0.0001) in patients (pts) with BRAF V600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) compared with current standard of care. This analysis focuses on the patient-reported quality of life (QOL) assessments from this study. Methods: The BEACON CRC study was a randomized, open-label, 3-arm, phase 3 global study which evaluated triplet (ENCO+BINI+CETUX) or doublet (ENCO+CETUX) vs. investigator’s choice of irinotecan + CETUX or FOLFIRI + CETUX in pts with BRAFV600E mCRC. QOL assessments (secondary endpoints in the trial) included the EORTC QOL Questionnaire (QLQ C30), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Colon Cancer (FACT C), EuroQol 5D 5L, and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). The primary assessment for the QOL variables was the time to definitive 10% deterioration between arms. Results: 665 pts were randomly assigned to receive either triplet (n = 224), doublet (n = 220), or control (n = 221). Reduction in the risk of QOL deterioration was an estimated 45% (HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.70) and 44% (HR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.71) in EORTC QLQ C30 and FACT C assessments, respectively, in favor of the triplet regimen over control. For the doublet vs. control, reduction in risk of QOL deterioration was an estimated 46% (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.69) and 43% (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.72) in EORTC QLQ C30 and FACT C, respectively in favor of the doublet. Similar results were observed in EuroQol 5D 5L and PGIC assessments. There were no overall differences in QOL between triplet and doublet across the 4 instruments. Conclusions: In BEACON CRC, triplet and doublet demonstrated substantial improvement in patient-reported QOL assessments over the current standard of care in pts with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic CRC whose disease had progressed after 1 or 2 prior regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT02928224.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi205-vi205
Author(s):  
Tobias Walbert ◽  
Lonni Schultz ◽  
James Snyder ◽  
Aarushi Suneja

Abstract BACKGROUND Health-related quality of life (QoL) and patient reported outcomes are essential to guide patient-care. The NIH sponsored electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is well established in multiple cancers but not in Glioblastoma (GBM). The aim of this study was to analyze the association of the PROMIS measures with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core instrument (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and the brain tumor specific EORTC QLQ-BN20 questionnaire (EORTC-BN20) in GBM patients. METHODS Newly diagnosed patients with GBM were enrolled prospectively to assess association between both tools. The PROMIS modules were selected to reflect the quality of life domains assessed in the EORTC- QLQ-C30 and EORTC-BN20 questionnaires. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were computed between the PROMIS and EORTC-C30/ EORTC-BN20 measures. Due to multiple responses over time, the p-values for the correlation coefficients were adjusted. Because of the large number of correlations computed and many with p-values less than 0.05, the magnitude of the correlation was considered. Correlations greater than 0.5 or less than -0.5 were consider to be “strong” associations, while correlations between 0.3 and 0.499 (or -0.3 and -0.499) were consider to be “moderate”. RESULTS 43 patients with 124 PROMIS/EORTC responses were included in this analysis. The PROMIS measures had strong associations with the QoL functioning and fatigue measures from the EORTC-C30 and future uncertainty, communication deficit, motor dysfunction, social satisfaction and drowsiness from the EORTC-BN20 (all p< 0.001 and correlation >0.5). CONCLUSIONS There are strong and moderate correlations in the majority of PROMIS assessments and the EORTC tools. The PROMIS toolkit may be used to assess core features of the EORTC surveys. GI symptoms, seizures and itchy skin do not correlate. Given the prior documented shorter assessment time, the PROMIS toolkit may be a feasible alternative to established legacy tools to assess QoL in GBM patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document