A restrospective analysis of toxicities encountered with palliative epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (EOX) chemotherapy for advanced esophagogastric cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 162-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelize Sadrudin Khakoo ◽  
Alexandros Georgiou ◽  
Justin S. Waters
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Neutropenic Sepsis ◽  
Treatment Interruptions ◽  
Prophylactic Measures ◽  
Esophagogastric Cancer ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Practice Methods

162 Background: Palliative chemotherapy for advanced gastric and gastro-oesophageal junctional (GEJ) carcinoma improves tumour related symptoms and overall survival compared to best supportive care alone. EOX has been established as one of the most effective regimens in randomised clinical trials, but produced significant toxicity. We wished to examine the tolerability of EOX in everyday practice. Methods: A retrospective search was conducted to identify patients with advanced gastric or GEJ cancer, treated at our institution with at least one cycle of first line palliative EOX between 2009 and 2012. Patient baseline characteristics, toxicities (graded according to CTCAEv.4), dose reductions, treatment interruptions and discontinuations were analysed. Results: We identified 60 patients, 83% were male, and the median age was 64 years (age range18-82 years). 85% had a baseline performance status (PS) of 1, 10% PS of 2 and 5% PS of 0. 75% had GEJ cancer and the remainder had gastric cancer. 82% were commenced on standard EOX (1250mg/m2 capecitabine, 130mg/m2 oxaliplatin and 50mg/m2). 80% of patients experienced grade 3 or worse toxicity. 27% discontinued treatment due to excessive toxicity and 37% due to progressive disease. Significant toxicities (at least grade 3) were: 28% neutropenia, 27% diarrhoea, 23% fatigue, 10% vomiting, 10% anaemia, 8% neutropenic sepsis, 8% nausea, 5% thrombocytopenia, 5% peripheral neuropathy, 3% mucositis and 3% chest pain. 47% of patients required a dose reduction of at least 1 drug. 66% of patients completed 3 cycles, 35% completed 6 cycles and 18% completed 8 cycles. The mean progression free survival for patients completing 8 cycles was 4.6 months. Conclusions: EOX improves tumour related symptoms and overall survival but the benefits are often short-lived and in some patients it is associated with unacceptable toxicity, given their limited life expectancy. More thought needs to be given to prophylactic measures and modification of the EOX regimen to improve tolerability without compromising efficacy.

Efficacy study of metronomic chemotherapy in metastatic NSCLC.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19092-e19092
Author(s):  
B. J. Srinivas ◽  
Nayak Radheshyam ◽  
C. Gunasagar ◽  
Eriat Govind ◽  
Veldore H. Vidya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Metronomic Chemotherapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Metastatic Lung ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Grade 3

e19092 Background: Metastatic lung cancer patients are at best treated palliatively. We evaluated the effects of metronomic chemotherapy on survival outcomes in this population. Methods: Thirty four subjects with treatment refractory (n=26) and treatment naive (n=7) metastatic lung cancer were included in a open label single arm efficacy study of metronomic chemotherapy. Patients were given a chemotherapy regimen of Tab. Cyclophsophamide 50 mg once daily and cap. etoposide 50 mg once daily, 3 weeks on and one week off in 28 day cycle over a minimum period of 3 months or until the progression of their disease whichever was earlier. Patients were assessed for treatment response using RECIST criteria (version 1.1) and duration of progression free survival and overall survival. Data were analysed using Kaplan Meier survival analysis. Results: The mean age of the study population was 63.4 ±11.2 years. The mean duration of metronomic chemotherapy was 94.9 ±60.4 days. Overall 64.7% had progressive disease and 26.5% had stable disease. There was a significant improvement in overall survival in those with ECOG performance status of 1 compared to ECOG status of 2 (median survival =240 vs.52 days, Log Rank Mantel Cox =11.32, p=0.001) and pathology grade 2 compared to grade 3 (median survival =200 vs. 37 days, Breslows Wilcoxon =5.76, p=0.02) and stable disease on RECIST compared to progressive disease following metronomic chemotherapy (Median survival =360 vs. 50 days, Log Rank Mantel Cox =8.68, p=0.003). There was also a significant improvement in progression free survival in those with ECOG performance status of 1 compared to ECOG status of 2 (median survival =98 vs. 52 days, Log Rank Mantel Cox =6.62, p=0.001) and in grade 2 compared to grade 3 disease (mean survival =97 vs.32 days, Log Rank Mantel Cox =4.73, p=0.03). Tumor load and multiple organ sites of disease did not seem to influence survival. Conclusions: The results suggest stable response in about one third of study population, favorable progression free and overall survival rates following metronomic chemotherapy. Performance status is important predictors in this category of population.

Observational Study Of VMP (Bortezomib, melphalan, prednisolone) Regimen For Newly Diagnosed Korean Myeloma Patients Who Are Not Eligible For Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5379-5379
Author(s):  
Kihyun Kim ◽  
Mark Lee ◽  
Hyo Jung Kim ◽  
Yang Soo Kim ◽  
Keon Woo Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Common Cause ◽  
Prophylactic Measures ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background VMP regimen for newly diagnosed myeloma patients is well-documented treatment. However patients in real practice generally have worse performance status and less attention than those in clinical trials. Thus we conducted observational study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of VMP treatment in newly diagnosed Korean myeloma patients. Patients and Methods Data were prospectively collected from 39 hospitals. One hundred seventy three patients who started VMP as first line from 2011 May to 2012 April were included for analysis. Results Median age was 71 and 22.5% were more than 75 years old. Fifty-seven per cent were male sex. IgG type was most common (61.9%) and IgA 24.9%. ISS stage I was 13.8% and III was 51.5%. Patients with high risk FISH (Del17p, t(4;14), and t(4;16)) were 4.1%, 4.1%, and 2.3% respectively. Dose and schedule was followed original VISTA trial except for use of prednisolone instead of prednisone. Median 5cycles (range 1-9) were given and 105 patients stopped in the course of treatment. Most common cause were adverse event (28.8%) followed by disease progression or no response (19.6%). Twenty-five mortality cases were reported and 22 were in the course of treatment. The most common cause of mortality was infection (61%) followed by disease progression (13%). Overall response rate was 72.3% and response more than VGPR was 37.6%. Median progression free survival is 455 days and median OS was 504 days. One year PFS was 80.9 % and one year OS was 83.4%. Most common toxicity was cytopenia, peripheral neuropathy, and gastrointestinal toxicities such as nausea and diarrhea. Peripheral neuropathy of all grade and grade 3 or more was 58.6% and 6.36%, respectively Discussions Even though patients with higher proportion of ISS stage, efficacy of VMP regimen was considerable in Korean patients. With relatively high mortality due to infection in the course of treatment prophylactic measures for infection need to be developed. To reduce the incidence of peripheral neuropathy, close observation and intervention are needed to prevent aggravation of neuropathy. Disclosures: Off Label Use: lenalidomide in newly diagnosed myeloma. Kwak:celgene: Research Funding.

Phase I randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine, erlotinib, and cixutumumab versus gemcitabine plus erlotinib as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (SWOG-0727).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 198-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Agop Philip ◽  
Bryan H. Goldman ◽  
Ramesh K. Ramanathan ◽  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
Andrew M. Lowy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Complex Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Fasting Blood Glucose ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Grade 3

198 Background: Targeting a single pathway in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) did not impact the natural history of this molecularly complex disease. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeting with erlotinib marginally improved the outcome of patients with advanced disease. We tested the hypothesis that if the EGFR and IGF-1R pathways are simultaneously blocked then progression free survival (PFS) would be significantly improved by abrogating reciprocal signaling. Methods: S0727 was a phase I/randomized phase II (RP2) study testing the anti-IGF-1R monoclonal antibody cixutumumab combined with erlotinib and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic PAC. The control arm was erlotinib plus gemcitabine. The primary endpoint of the RP2 portion of the study was PFS. Eligibility included patients with untreated metastatic disease, performance status 0/1, fasting blood glucose less than institutional upper limit of normal, and willingness to provide tissue and blood specimens for correlative studies. Results: In Phase I portion (n=10) safety of cixutumumab 6 mg/kg IV/wk, erlotinib 100 mg/day orally and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV D 1,8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle was established. In the RP2 portion (n=124) 114 eligible patients (median age 63) were included. On the cixutumumab arm, 59% of patients were female vs. 41% on control arm. Median PFS and overall survival were 4 and 7 months, respectively, in both arms. Four patients on cixutumumab remain on treatment; sensitivity analyses show no impact on the conclusions. Major grade 3 and 4 toxicities were (cixutumumab/control) elevation of transaminases (12%/6%), fatigue (24%/21%), gastrointestinal (35%/28%), and hematologic (53%/39%). Grade 3/4 hyperglycemia was seen in 27% of patients on cixutumumab. Grade 3 or 4 kin toxicity was similar in both arms of the study (< 5%). Five treatment-related deaths were reported: 2 cardiac on each arm, 1 pulmonary on cixutumumab. Conclusions: IGF-1R inhibitor cixutumumab did not improve the progression free or overall survival in patients with metastatic PAC treated with erlotinib and gemcitabine in a molecularly unselected population.

Randomized phase II trial comparing the efficacy of standard-dose with high-dose twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in limited disease small-cell lung cancer (LD SCLC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9007-9007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjorn Henning Gronberg ◽  
Kristin Toftaker Killingberg ◽  
Øystein Fløtten ◽  
Maria Moksnes Bjaanæs ◽  
Tesfaye Madebo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cranial Irradiation ◽  
Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Grade 3

9007 Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment of LD SCLC. Some patients are cured, but most relapse and better treatment is needed. 45 Gy in 30 fractions BID is the most recommended TRT-schedule. Studies suggest that a higher TRT-dose might prolong survival, but hitherto, this has not been confirmed in randomized trials. We aimed to investigate whether high-dose BID TRT of 60 Gy in 40 fractions was feasible, tolerated, and improved survival. Methods: Patients > 18 years, performance status (PS) 0-2 and confirmed LD SCLC were to receive 4 courses of platinum/etoposide and were randomized to BID TRT of 60 or 45 Gy. Responders were offered prophylactic cranial irradiation of 25-30 Gy. Primary endpoint was 2-year survival; secondary endpoints were toxicity, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). To demonstrate a 25% improvement of 2-year survival from 53% to 66% with a one-sided α = .10 and β = .80, 75 patients were required on each arm. Results: Between 2014-2018, 176 patients were enrolled at 22 Scandinavian hospitals. 160 completed TRT per protocol and were eligible for the present analyses (60 Gy: n = 84, 45 Gy: n = 76). Median age was 65, 58% women, 90% PS 0-1. There were no significant differences in grade 3–4 esophagitis (60 Gy: 19%, 45 Gy: 18%, p = .92) or grade 3–4 pneumonitis (60 Gy: 4%, 45 Gy: 0%, p = .10). There was a trend towards more neutropenic infections on the 45 Gy arm (60 Gy: 21%, 45 Gy: 36%, p = .05). There were no significant differences in other grade 3-4 toxicity. Three patients died during the study treatment period (60 Gy: one neutropenic infection and one aortic dissection; 45 Gy: one thrombocytopenic bleeding). There were no statistically significant differences in response rates (60 Gy: 88% [95% CI 81-95], 45 Gy: 85% [95% CI 76-93], p = .52) or median PFS (60 Gy: 20 months [95% CI 11-29], 45 Gy: 14 months [95% CI 10-19], p = .31). Significantly more patients on the 60 Gy arm were alive after 2 years (60 Gy: 73% [95% CI 63-83], 45 Gy: 46% [95% CI 36-60], p = .001), and they had a significantly longer median overall survival (60 Gy: 42 months [95% CI 32-51], 45 Gy: 23 months [95% CI 17-28], HR .63 [95% CI .41-.96], p = .031). Conclusions: LD SCLC patients who received BID TRT of 60 Gy had a statistically significant and numerically substantial benefit in terms of 2-year survival (primary endpoint) and median overall survival compared with those who received BID TRT of 45 Gy. The higher TRT dose did not cause more toxicity than the standard dose. Clinical trial information: NCT02041845.

A retrospective comparison study of docetaxel and paclitaxel for patients with advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer who previously received fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based chemotherapy.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 112-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi Shirakawa ◽  
Ken Kato ◽  
Naoki Takahashi ◽  
Hirokazu Shoji ◽  
Tetsuji Terazawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hospital Performance ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3

112 Background: Fluoropyrimidine plus platinum (FP)-based chemotherapy has been widely used as a first-line regimen for advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer (EC). Although the taxanes have shown efficacy in esophageal cancer after FP-based chemotherapy, there is no standard regimen for second-line chemotherapy (SLC). We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the clinical features of taxane therapy in SLC of EC. Methods: The selection criteria were pathologically proven EC; advanced or recurrent disease that had previously been treated with FP at our hospital; performance status 0-2; and adequate organ functions. The FP regimens used included 5-FU or S-1 and cisplatin or nedaplatin. Docetaxel (DTX) was administerd at 70mg/m2 triweekly for 6 weeks with 1 week’s rest. Paclitaxel (PTX) was administered at 100mg/m2 weekly with the same schedule. Overall survival of PTX was compared to DTX with baseline prognostic factors adjusted, using Cox proportional hazard model. Results: The analysis covered 110 patients over the period from August 2006 to June 2012. The median age was 64 years (range 39-83); 97 males and 13 females; 108 squamous cell carcinomas and 2 adenocarcinomas; 34 advanced and 76 recurrent; cStage I/II/III/IV at diagnosis 8/21/49/32; PS 0/1/2 score 20/81/9; DTX treatment 82 patients and PTX treatment 28. Progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.3 & 6.1 months with PTX and 2.8 and 6.9 months with DTX (no significant difference). The response rates were PTX/DTX/Total 11.1%/3.7%/5.5%. Hazard ratio of overall survival between DTX and PTX was 1.054 with adjusted by PS, sex and number of metastasis. The rate of grade 3-4 neutropenia was higher with DTX (28%) than with PTX (7%). Grade 3 febrile neutropenia was seen in 3.7% of DTX-treated patients but in no PTX patients. Grade 2 or more fatigue was seen in 16% of DTX patients and 10% of PTX ones, and grade 2 or more neuropathy was seen in 1.2% of DTX patients and 32% of PTX ones. Conclusions: PTX and DTX were both effective in SLC of EC, but the toxicity profiles of the two regimens differed. In terms of febrile neutropenia or fatigue, PTX seems more appropriate for SLC of EC.

Dual blockade of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 (IGF-1R) signaling in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Phase I/randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine, erlotinib, and cixutumumab versus gemcitabine plus erlotinib (SWOG-0727).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4019-4019
Author(s):  
Philip Agop Philip ◽  
Bryan H. Goldman ◽  
Ramesh K. Ramanathan ◽  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
Andrew M. Lowy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Fasting Blood Glucose ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Grade 3

4019 Background: Targeting a single pathway in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) is unlikely to impact its natural history. EGFR targeting with erlotinib added to gemcitabine (G) marginally improved the outcome of patients with advanced disease. We tested the hypothesis that if the EGFR and IGF-1R pathways are simultaneously blocked then progression free survival (PFS) would be significantly improved by abrogating reciprocal signaling that leads to resistance to either drug. Methods: This was a phase I/randomized phase II (RP2) study testing the anti-IGF-1R monoclonal antibody cixutumumab combined with erlotinib and G in patients with metastatic PAC. The control arm was erlotinib plus G. The primary endpoint of the RP2 portion of the study was PFS. Eligibility included patients with untreated metastatic disease, performance status 0/1, fasting blood glucose less than institutional upper limit of normal, and willingness to provide tissue and blood specimens for correlative studies. Results: In phase I portion (n=10) safety of cixutumumab 6 mg/kg IV/wk, erlotinib 100 mg/day orally and G 1000 mg/m2 IV D 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle was established. In the RP2 portion (n=124) 114 eligible patients (median age 63) were included. On the cixutumumab arm, 59% of patients were female vs. 40% on control arm. Median PFS and overall survival were 3.7 and 6.7 months, respectively, in both arms of the study. Major grade 3 and 4 toxicities were (cixutumumab/control) elevation of transaminases (12%/6%), fatigue (16%/12%), gastrointestinal (35%/28%), neutropenia (21%/10%), and thrombocytopenia (16%/7%). Grade 3/4 hyperglycemia was seen in 16% of patients on cixutumumab. Grade 3 or 4 kin toxicity was similar in both arms of the study (< 5%). Five treatment-related deaths were reported: 2 cardiac on each arm, 1 pulmonary on cixutumumab. Conclusions: IGF-1R inhibitor cixutumumab did not improve the progression free or overall survival of patients with metastatic PAC treated with erlotinib and G in a molecularly unselected population.

Concurrent cetuximab (CTX) and nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): Results of phase II study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6515-6515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine H. Chung ◽  
Marcelo Raul Bonomi ◽  
Conor Ernst Steuer ◽  
Michael J. Schell ◽  
Jiannong Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Infusion Reaction ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Grade 3

6515 Background: While anti-Programmed Death-1 (anti-PD-1) inhibitors have efficacy, only some patients (pts) with R/M HNSCC achieve clinically significant benefits. We designed the study to determine the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate of concurrent CTX and NIVO in patients who had progressed on at least one prior treatment for their R/M HNSCC. Methods: Pts were treated with CTX 500 mg/m2 IV on Day (D) -14 as a lead-in followed by CTX 500 mg/m2 IV and NIVO 240 mg/m2 IV on D1 and D15 every 28-D cycle (C). Pts with CTX infusion reaction or who did not receive C1D1 for any reason were non-evaluable and replaced. NIVO dose reduction was not allowed but withheld/discontinued based on adverse event (AE) severity. Results: Total 47 pts are enrolled. 2 pts are non-evaluable. 45 evaluable pts are analyzed. Median age is 64 (24-77). ECOG performance status at baseline is 0 (9, 20%), 1 (33, 73%), and 2 (3, 7%). Primary sites are oral cavity 10 (22%), oropharynx 24 (53%), hypopharynx 3 (7%), larynx 6 (13%), and unknown primary 2 (4%). p16 status is available in 33 (73%). Prior treatments before the study enrollment are: chemotherapy (CT) 42 (93%), no CT 3 (7%), radiotherapy (RT) 38 (84%), no RT 7 (16%), checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) 23 (51%), and no CPI 22 (49%). PD-L1 combined positive scores (CPS) is available in 30 (67%). Median follow up time for overall survival (OS) is 12.6 months. The most common grade 3 treatment-related AE (TRAE) occurring ≥2 are fatigue 6 (13%) and rash-acneiform 2 (4.4%). The only grade 4 TRAE is CTX infusion reaction in 1 (2.2%). The most common grade 3 immune-related AE (IRAE) occurring ≥2 is fatigue 3 (6.7%). No grade 4 IRAE is observed. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and median OS are summarized in Table. Pts with no prior exposure to CPI have favorable PFS and OS relative to pts with prior CPI (PFS: HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25-0.97, p=0.04 and OS: HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.22-1.14, p=0.09). Conclusions: Our data suggest the combination of CTX and NIVO is active in pts without prior CPI exposure and overall well tolerated in all pts. These preliminary results support further evaluation of the combination in CPI naïve pts. Clinical trial information: NCT03370276 . [Table: see text]

Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Patients Treated with NAb-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: The NAPA Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 887-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Catalano ◽  
Giandomenico Roviello ◽  
Raffaele Conca ◽  
Alberto D’Angelo ◽  
Valeria Emma Palmieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Prognostic And Predictive Markers

Background: The phase III MPACT trial demonstrated the superiority of gemcitabine (Gem) combined with Nab-paclitaxel (Nab-P) versus gemcitabine alone in previously untreated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of Gem/Nab-P in routine clinical practice. Methods: From January 2015 to December 2018, patients with metastatic PDAC receiving firstline treatment with a combination of gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel were included in a multicentre retrospective observational study. Exploratory analyses of efficacy, and prognostic and predictive markers, were performed. Results: The cohort comprised 115 patients (median age 65 [range 50-84] years) with good performance status (ECOG PS 0-1). The median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (95% CI; 9-13) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6 months (95% CI 5-7). Partial response and stable disease were achieved in 44 and 30 patients, respectively, yielding an overall disease control rate (DCR) of 64.3%. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity frequency was 22.61% for neutropenia, 5.22% for anemia, and 3.48% for thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 asthenia was recorded in 2.61% of patients. No grade 4 non-hematological events were reported. Dose reduction was necessary in 51.3% of the patients. Conclusions: Our results confirm the efficacy and safety of a first-line regimen comprising gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel in metastatic PDAC in a real-life population.

scholarly journals Evaluation of efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab combined with or without docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Wang ◽  
Jun Nie ◽  
Ling Dai ◽  
Weiheng Hu ◽  
Jie Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Doublet Chemotherapy ◽  
Platinum Doublet

Abstract Background The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and chemotherapy has been clinically confirmed to be beneficial as the first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. This study aimed to assess the effect of nivolumab + docetaxel versus nivolumab monotherapy in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy. Materials and methods The efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab + docetaxel combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy were compared in this retrospective study. Primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results Between November 2017 and December 2019, 77 patients were included in this study, with 58 patients in the nivolumab group and 19 in the nivolumab + docetaxel group. The median follow-up was 18 months, and the PFS was 8 months for patients receiving nivolumab + docetaxel and 2 months for those receiving nivolumab alone (p = 0.001), respectively. Nivolumab + docetaxel showed superior OS compared with nivolumab, with the median OS unreached versus 7 months (p = 0.011). Among patients without EGFR/ALK variation, compared to nivolumab monotherapy, nivolumab + docetaxel showed better PFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p  = 0.05). There was no significant difference in grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) between the two groups (p = 0.253). Conclusions The combination of nivolumab and docetaxel demonstrated a meaningful improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival compared to nivolumab monotherapy, in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy, irrespective of EGFR/ALK variation status.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document