Everolimus as second-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after one previous VEGF-targeted therapy: Final results of the noninterventional change study.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 469-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Goebell ◽  
Ulrich Kube ◽  
Michael Staehler ◽  
Christian Doehn ◽  
Thomas Steiner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

469 Background: The mTOR inhibitor everolimus is approved for the treatment of mRCC following failure of VEGF-targeted therapy. To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of everolimus following the first VEGF-targeted therapy in routine clinical practice, we conducted the prospective, noninterventional CHANGE study in Germany. Methods: Patients (pts) with mRCC (any histology) were registered at the time of everolimus initiation, or within 90 days thereof, following treatment with either VEGFR-TKI or bevacizumab. Other previous systemic therapies (e.g., cytokines) were permitted. Pts received everolimus 10 mg/d according to the summary product characteristics until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Study objectives included assessing treatment duration, time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and safety. Results: 334 pts were documented at 116 German sites between August 2009 and January 2012 (median age, 68 years; 75% male; median KPS, 80%; 88% clear cell histology). At the start of first-line therapy, MSKCC risk status was favorable in 35%, intermediate in 56%, and poor in 9%. Effectiveness results are shown in the table. In the safety population (n=318), median time to ≥10% deterioration in KPS was 8.4 months (95% CI, 6.1-10.1 months); the most common AEs (any grade) were dyspnea (17%), anemia (14%), and fatigue (12%). Treatment adherence was high, with <2% of patients per visit showing <50% intake of the expected doses. Conclusions: The CHANGE study demonstrates favorable effectiveness and tolerability for everolimus when given in routine clinical practice to pts with mRCC. Our data confirm the use of everolimus as a standard second-line therapy following VEGF-targeted treatment. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Protocol of the EFFORT study: a prospective study of FOLFIRI plus aflibercept as second-line treatment after progression on FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab or during maintenance treatment in patients with unresectable/metastatic colorectal cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironaga Satake ◽  
Koji Ando ◽  
Eiji Oki ◽  
Mototsugu Shimokawa ◽  
Akitaka Makiyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is used as a first-line therapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. However, there are no clear recommendations for second-line therapy after FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab combination. Here, we describe our planning for the EFFORT study to investigate whether FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for mCRC. Methods EFFORT is an open-label, multicenter, single arm phase II study to evaluate whether a FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for mCRC. Patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer who received FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as a first-line therapy will receive aflibercept and FOLFIRI (aflibercept 4 mg/kg, irinotecan 150 mg/m2 IV over 90 min, with levofolinate 200 mg/m2 IV over 2 h, followed by fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 46 h) every 2 weeks on day 1 of each cycle. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). To achieve 80% power to show a significant response benefit with a one-sided alpha level of 0.10, assuming a threshold progression-free survival of 3 months and an expected value of at least 5.4 months, we estimated that 32 patients are necessary. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, overall response rate, safety, and exploratory biomarker analysis for differentiating anti-VEGF drug in 2nd-line chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. Discussion This is the first study to investigate whether FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. Switching to a different type of anti-VEGF drug in second-line therapy after FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab appears to be an attractive treatment strategy when considering survival benefit. It is expected that this phase II study will prove the efficacy of this strategy and that a biomarker for drug selection will be discovered. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs071190003. Registered April 18, 2019.

Modified FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab followed by FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab beyond first progression in advanced colorectal cancer: CCOG-0801 study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 641-641
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi Ishigure ◽  
Goro Nakayama ◽  
Keisuke Uehara ◽  
Hiroyuki Yokoyama ◽  
Akiharu Ishiyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
To Receive

641 Background: Bevacizumab provides survival benefit as the first-line and second-line therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A large observational study suggested use of bevacizumab beyond first progression (BBP) improved survival. This prompted us to conduct a multicenter phase II study of mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab followed by FOLFIRI plus bevacizimab in mCRC to further explore the strategy of BBP in Japanese patients. Methods: Previously untreated patients with assessable disease were treated with mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab until tumor progression, followed by FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. The primary endpoint of the study was the second progression-free survival (2nd PFS), defined as duration from enrollment until progression after the second-line therapy. If the patient failed to receive the second-line treatment due to medical reasons or refusal, the PFS during the first-line therapy was used for analysis. Secondary endpoints were PFS, overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: In the first-line therapy, 47 patients treated with mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab achieved RR of 61.7%, DCR of 89.4% and median PFS of 11.7 months. Thirty patients went on to receive the second-line therapy with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab and achieved RR of 27.6%, DCR of 62.1%, and median PFS of 6.0 months. Median 2nd PFS was 16.2 months. Median survival time did not reach the median follow-up time of 27.4 months. Severe adverse events associated with bevacizumab during the first-line therapy were a venous thromboembolic event in one case (2%), a grade 2 bleeding event in one case (2%) and GI perforation in one case (2%). However, no critical events associated with bevacizumab were reported during the second-line therapy. Conclusions: The planned continuation of bevacizumab during the second line treatment is feasible in Japanese mCRC patients. A prospective randomized control study to confirm the efficacy has to be conducted in the future.

Progression-free survival in patients with cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements: An exploration of response to systemic therapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 588-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Bibeau ◽  
Luis Féliz ◽  
Scott Barrett ◽  
Ling Na ◽  
Christine Francis Lihou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

588 Background: Most cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients (pts) are diagnosed with advanced disease and are ineligible for surgery. FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements are present in 10–16% of pts with intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) and are reported to be oncogenic drivers. However, little data are available on the role of FGFR2 genetic alterations in the response to systemic cancer therapy. FIGHT-202 is a phase 2 study of pemigatinib (a selective, potent, oral FGFR1–3 inhibitor) in pts with previously treated advanced/metastatic CCA (NCT02924376); primary results were reported at ESMO 2019. FIGHT-202 enrolled pts who progressed on ≥1 prior therapy, allowing the examination of the role of FGFR2 alterations on the response to prior therapy. The objective of this post hoc analysis was to evaluate progression free survival (PFS) on standard systemic therapy received prior to study enrollment among pts with CCA harboring FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements ( FGFR2+). Methods: Case report forms were reviewed to determine disease history and exposure to prior lines of systemic cancer therapies (LOSCT) in the advanced setting before receiving pemigatinib. Only pts with sufficient data on prior LOSCT were included in this analysis. Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: 102 pts were included in this analysis (median age 54.5, 61.8% female). Median PFS on first-line therapy was 5.5 (95% CI: 4.0, 8.0) months. Among the 38 pts (37.3%) with ≥2 prior LOSCT, median PFS on second-line therapy was 4.4 (95% CI: 3.0, 5.3) months. Conclusions: This analysis provides data about PFS on standard systemic therapies for pts with FGFR2+ CCA. Median PFS on first-line therapy was lower than historical published data, and median PFS on second-line therapy was slightly longer than previously reported, in unselected CCA populations. Limitations of this analysis include retrospective examination of investigator reported data, and that clinical trial participants may not truly reflect a general CCA patient population. The short PFS on standard therapies in pts with FGFR2+ CCA highlights the need for development of other options including targeted therapies to improve outcomes.

scholarly journals Tolerance of ramucirumab in the second-line therapy of patients with disseminated gastric cancer in the routine clinical practice of Russia

2019 ◽  
pp. 104-113
Author(s):  
N. S. Besova ◽  
T. A. Titova ◽  
E. V. Artamonova ◽  
D. L. Stroyakovskiy ◽  
E. V. Perminova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

scholarly journals Characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with type 2 diabetes in Lebanon: the DISCOVER study

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 509-515
Author(s):  
Sami T. Azar ◽  
Akram Echtay ◽  
Mireille Amm ◽  
Hajar Ballout ◽  
Iskandar Cheaib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Glycaemic Control ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Background: Lebanon is part of the global DISCOVER study, a global, noninterventional, multicentre, prospective study with 3-years of follow-up. Aims: The aim of this study is to describe real-world clinical practice in terms of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) disease management and treatment patterns within Lebanon. Methods: Baseline demographic and clinical parameters were captured on a standardized case report form, according to routine clinical practice at each clinical site. Results: We recruited 348 patients. At the initiation of second-line therapy, mean duration of diabetes was 6.7 [standard deviation (SD) 6.5] years; mean HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose levels were 8.5% (SD 1.6%) and 178.7 (SD 56.5) mg/dL respectively. Almost half the patients were hypertensive (45.1%) or had dyslipidaemia (48.6%). Metformin monotherapy was used as first-line therapy in 56.9% of the patients and upfront dual therapy in 25%. The primary reason for changing first-line therapy was poor glycaemic control. The main factors in choosing the second-line therapy were efficacy, tolerability and hypoglycaemia. Conclusion: Clinical inertia was evident in this cohort of patients as they had suboptimal glycaemic control at the time of enrolment and the initiation of second-line therapy. Treatment intensification is required to reduce diabetes-related adverse outcomes.

Oral vinorelbine as a second-line chemotherapy option in advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20073-e20073
Author(s):  
Raul Rogelio Trejo Rosales ◽  
Jose Gustavo Nuñez Cerrillo ◽  
Juan Carlos Silva Godinez ◽  
Rodrigo Fernando Riera Sala ◽  
Maritza Peña Campos
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pleural Mesothelioma ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Oral Vinorelbine ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

e20073 Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an infrequent entity with a poor prognosis. Standard first line chemotherapy therapy is based on pemetrexed and cisplatin, however, there is no established standard second-line therapy. We report our experience with patients treated at a third-level referral center in Mexico, making emphasis in the use of oral vinorelbine. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of MPM patients treated between 2012 and 2018 at the Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, a third-level referral center in Mexico City. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of different second-line chemotherapy schemes in MPM patients. Results: A total of 143 patients were included. There were 47 women (32.8%) and 96 men (67.1%). Median age was 64 (range 39 - 86). The histological subtypes comprised of 73.4 % epitheloid, 9 % with a sarcomatoid component and 17.4% not otherwise specified. The majority of patients presented with advanced disease 32.1 stage III and 63.6 stage IV. 72% of patients had performance status 0-1, however 9.7% of patients had performance status 3-4 at diagnosis, and received only palliative care as treatment. A total of 125 patients received first-line chemotherapy, and 40 patients underwent second-line therapy. Usual schemes were based on pemetrexed, paclitaxel, gemcitabine and oral vinolrebine. Overall, partial response rate was 5% and stable disease was 35%. There were no statistical differences in response rates between schemes (p = 0.75). The most usual second-line scheme was oral vinolrebine. Progression-free survival was 4 months in vinolrebine-treated patients vs 2 months (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.86 – 1.25, p = 0.63) as compared with patients treated with other schemes. Conclusions: Our results are comparable with similar series in the second-line scenario. Oral-vinolrebine treatment progression-free survival was similar to other, more toxic drugs. However, we included few patients. More work is needed to identify the characteristics of benefitting patients.

Combination Antibiotic Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Non-Leukemic Patients

1989 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 443-448
Author(s):  
Giampietro Gasparini ◽  
Salvatore Turnolo ◽  
Giuseppe Toffoli ◽  
Renato Talamini ◽  
Alberto Vaglia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Duration ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Unknown Origin ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Neutropenic Patients

The use of more aggressive chemotherapies in the treatment of patients with some tumors has caused a higher frequency of neutropenia and subsequent serious infections. To verify the role in these patients of a combination therapy of amikacin (300 mg/m2 i.v. every 12 hours) plus ceftazidime (2 g/m2 i.v. every 8 hours) adminsitered as initial empiric treatment, followed in non-responsive cases by a second-line therapy with clindamycin (300 mg/m2 i.v. every 8 hours), we conducted a prospective study in 45 febrile episodes (temperature ≥38.5 °C) in neutropenic patients (neutrophils ≤500/ml). The patients' median age was 58 (range, 19-80); 29 were women and 16 were men. The median performance status was 50 (range, 30-90), and 71 % of the patients had progressive tumoral disease. Before antibiotic therapy the median duration of fever was 12 hours (range, 4-48 hours). The median granulocyte count was 350/ml (range, 100-500 cells/ml), and the median peak temperature was 38.8 °C (range, 38.5-41 °C). The median time for neutrophils to rise towards 1000/ml was 4 days (range, 2-12), and the median duration of therapy was 8 days (range, 3-12). Documented bacterial infections were present in 28 patients whereas 17 had clinically possible infections or fever of unknown origin. The infection sites in microbiologically documented infections were: septicemia (12), multiple sites (4), tonsillitis (4), urinary tract (4), pneumonia (2) and fistula (2). Complete response to first-line therapy was obtained in 36 out of 45 episodes (80 %; 95 % confidence limits from 65 % to 90 %). Five out of 8 cases responded to second-line therapy with clindamycin for an overall recovery rate of 91 %. The amikacin-ceftazidime combination followed by clindamycin in non-responsive cases is effective, with moderate toxicity in non-leukemic febrile neutropenic patients.

scholarly journals 1338. Analysis of Prescription Guideline Adherence in Pediatric Outpatient Pneumonia Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S680-S681
Author(s):  
Carly Heck ◽  
Judith Martin ◽  
Marcia Kurs-Lasky
Keyword(s):  
Drug Allergy ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Comparison Results ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Recommended Therapy

Abstract Background Background: Antibiotic resistance is a major public health concern. A modifiable intervention is outpatient antibiotic stewardship. The goal of this study was to review the electronic health records (EHR) of children diagnosed with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) to compare patients who received non-guideline concordant therapy with those prescribed recommended therapy. Methods Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of 300 children (6 months to 6 years old) with an outpatient diagnosis of CAP between July 2017 and June 2019. 45 Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh (CHP) and UPMC Children’s Community Pediatrics (CCP) practices were included. CHP practices are academic-based with trainees involved in visits, while CCP practices do not include trainees. First-line recommended therapy was defined as amoxicillin, second-line therapy as azithromycin or amoxicillin-clavulanate, and all other prescriptions were defined as other. Patients prescribed first-line therapy were compared to patients with second-line therapy or other. If first-line therapy was not prescribed, the EHR was manually reviewed for justification. If drug allergy was listed, the medication allergy and type of reaction were recorded. Results Results: In this study the minority of children (43%) were prescribed first-line therapy. This group was younger (57 vs. 63 months of age), more likely to be Non-white (80%), and seen at the CHP locations than those prescribed non-guideline concordant therapy. The average symptom duration was shorter, heart rate and respiratory rate were higher and the presence of fever was more common in the first-line therapy group. Justification for non-guideline therapy was most often reported as to provide coverage for atypical organisms. The most common drug allergy recorded was amoxicillin, and urticaria with unknown timing was the most common type of reaction. Demographics Comparison Results Justification for Second-line / Other Therapy and Drug Allergy Results Conclusion This project observed a high proportion of children being prescribed non-guideline concordant therapy for a diagnosis of CAP. Age, race, practice location, and severity of illness measures showed a statistically significant difference between groups. This study highlights the importance of education which reviews the current guidelines and the most likely pathogens for children with CAP. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Survival of Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Improves With the Availability of Fluorouracil-Leucovorin, Irinotecan, and Oxaliplatin in the Course of Treatment

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1209-1214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Grothey ◽  
Daniel Sargent ◽  
Richard M. Goldberg ◽  
Hans-Joachim Schmoll
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii Trials

Purpose Fluorouracil (FU)-leucovorin (LV), irinotecan, and oxaliplatin administered alone or in combination have proven effective in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Combination protocols using FU-LV with either irinotecan or oxaliplatin are currently regarded as standard first-line therapies in this disease. However, the importance of the availability of all three active cytotoxic agents, FU-LV, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin, on overall survival (OS) has not yet been evaluated. Materials and Methods We analyzed data from seven recently published phase III trials in advanced CRC to correlate the percentage of patients receiving second-line therapy and the percentage of patients receiving all three agents with the reported median OS, using a weighted analysis. Results The reported median OS is significantly correlated with the percentage of patients who received all three drugs in the course of their disease (P = .0008) but not with the percentage of patients who received any second-line therapy (P = .19). In addition, the use of combination protocols as first-line therapy was associated with a significant improvement in median survival of 3.5 months (95% CI, 1.27 to 5.73 months; P = .0083). Conclusion Our results support the strategy of making these three active drugs available to all patients with advanced CRC who are candidates for such therapy to maximize OS. In addition, our findings suggest that, with the availability of effective salvage options, OS should no longer be regarded as the most appropriate end point by which to assess the efficacy of a palliative first-line treatment in CRC.

Optimizing Second-Line Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Work in Progress

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.21.01552
Author(s):  
Nancy L. Bartlett
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Clinical Context ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Management Approaches ◽  
Grand Rounds

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document