From PRO screening to improved wellness: A nurse-led intervention.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 72-72
Author(s):  
Alison Morris ◽  
Erika L Tribett ◽  
Sandy Tun ◽  
Marcy Winget ◽  
Douglas W. Blayney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Outcome Measurement ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Care Pathways ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Oncology Practice

72 Background: Emotional and physical distress in cancer patients is underreported and undertreated. In effort to address this, the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) requires patients to be screened for emotional well-being and pain by their second oncology visit. This project details one cancer center’s quality improvement initiative to: (1) utilize patient reported outcomes (PRO) screening to identify patient distress, (2) develop adaptive nurse-led algorithms to assess and intervene for unmet needs. Methods: In June 2015, we launched electronic collection of PROs using the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Instrument System (PROMIS) global screen. Screening is completed via EMR patient portal prior to first return visit and 30-day intervals thereafter. A nurse-led algorithm categorizing distress was developed with evidence-based clinical pathways for care. Pathways optimize primary palliative care and referrals to specialist palliative services when appropriate. In August 2015, we will randomize four nurse navigators in gynecologic oncology to test the algorithm and make adaptations for scaling cancer center wide. We will assess the percent of patients screening positive for distress and the rate of primary palliative care interventions (e.g., symptom management and psychosocial support). We will also assess rate of referral to specialist palliative teams. Finally, we will interview a subset of patients to compare self-reported need, clinical management of needs, and whether needs were managed to the patient’s satisfaction. Results: We expect to report on adoption and adaptation of the algorithm for disease-specific groups. We will also report rates of primary palliative care interventions, referrals to specialist palliative care and PROs. Conclusions: Standard screening using PROs and clinical care pathways may foster early identification and management of patient’s psychosocial and physical needs. Support for oncology nurses to lead assessment and connect patients with resources is an opportunity to incorporate primary palliative care into oncology practice. The use of structured, adaptive, novel algorithms is a promising approach to meet patient needs and improve access to supportive resources.

Pathways, partners and payers: The trifecta of palliative care integration.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 129-129
Author(s):  
Diane G. Portman ◽  
Sarah Thirlwell
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Strategic Alliance ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Care Pathways ◽  
Disease States

129 Background: Moffitt Cancer Center has developed proprietary oncology clinical pathways. Multiple external partnership agreements which require adoption of these pathways have been completed. Our Center has enacted new cancer care delivery and payment arrangements with payers to foster cost and quality balance via use of the pathways and earlier involvement of palliative care (PC). Methods: Executive and PC leadership collaborated with the clinical pathways and strategic alliance teams to identify high priority disease states for integration of PC. Working with oncologist pathway developers, critical junctures in the pathways for inclusion of PC consultation were proposed and refined. EHR mechanisms to promote pathway adherence by clinicians were initiated. The value of pathway utilization and care coordination to involve PC was promoted to prospective oncology partners and payers. Results: PC has been mandated in oncology clinical care pathways, with a focus on thoracic, breast, gastrointestinal, prostate, gynecologic and hematologic malignancies, as directed by specific payer arrangements. Partnerships have expanded, resulting in greater utilization of PC by other centers as well. Increased referral volumes to PC, broader symptom control, and enhanced advance care planning have resulted. Conclusions: Incorporation of PC in oncologic clinical care pathways, with dissemination to internal providers, external partners and as part of novel payment models, optimizes PC integration. [Table: see text]

The Support, Education, and Advocacy (SEA) Program of Care for Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Nurse-Led Palliative Care Demonstration Program

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 864-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Reiser ◽  
Margaret Rosenzweig ◽  
Ann Welsh ◽  
Dianxu Ren ◽  
Barbara Usher
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Social Service ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Generalized Anxiety ◽  
Supportive Services ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: Women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) experience unique symptom management and psychosocial needs due to aggressive, yet palliative treatment with a progressive, chronic illness. Objective: This article describes the effect of a quality improvement project for coordination of supportive care in MBC. Program evaluations included referral rates for supportive services, patient-reported outcomes of symptom distress, generalized anxiety, and overall well-being. Design: An interdisciplinary Support, Education and Advocacy Program (MBC-SEA) was developed. The 1-hour, weekly, patient review included collaborative assessments to determine needs for social service, psychological counseling, and palliative care. A prospective pre- and postexperimental cohort design with convenience sampling was used. Analysis was conducted with paired t test analysis of pre- and postimplementation outcomes. Setting/Participants: Program outcomes of 118 women with MBC visiting an urban outpatient breast cancer clinic during September 2016 to November 2016 (pre) and January 2017 to March 2017 (post) were evaluated. Measurements: Referral rates to social work and palliative care, symptom, anxiety, and overall well-being scores. Results: Following program implementation, referrals to palliative care and social work supportive services increased significantly including patient-reported outcomes symptom distress scores mean difference 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.4306-2.6428), P = .004; generalized anxiety scores mean difference 1.5 (95% CI: 0.5406-2.5781), P = .003; and overall well-being mean difference of −0.7 (95% CI: −1.3498 to −0.0570), P = .03. Conclusions: Purposeful nurse-led assessment for social service and palliative care needs increases referrals with improvement in patient-reported outcomes.

scholarly journals Digital Phenotyping and Patient-Generated Health Data for Outcome Measurement in Surgical Care: A Scoping Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 282
Author(s):  
Prakash Jayakumar ◽  
Eugenia Lin ◽  
Vincent Galea ◽  
Abraham J. Mathew ◽  
Nikhil Panda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Outcome Measurement ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Health Data ◽  
The Body ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Digital Phenotyping ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Patient Reported

Digital phenotyping—the moment-by-moment quantification of human phenotypes in situ using data related to activity, behavior, and communications, from personal digital devices, such as smart phones and wearables—has been gaining interest. Personalized health information captured within free-living settings using such technologies may better enable the application of patient-generated health data (PGHD) to provide patient-centered care. The primary objective of this scoping review is to characterize the application of digital phenotyping and digitally captured active and passive PGHD for outcome measurement in surgical care. Secondarily, we synthesize the body of evidence to define specific areas for further work. We performed a systematic search of four bibliographic databases using terms related to “digital phenotyping and PGHD,” “outcome measurement,” and “surgical care” with no date limits. We registered the study (Open Science Framework), followed strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, performed screening, extraction, and synthesis of results in line with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. A total of 224 studies were included. Published studies have accelerated in the last 5 years, originating in 29 countries (mostly from the USA, n = 74, 33%), featuring original prospective work (n = 149, 66%). Studies spanned 14 specialties, most commonly orthopedic surgery (n = 129, 58%), and had a postoperative focus (n = 210, 94%). Most of the work involved research-grade wearables (n = 130, 58%), prioritizing the capture of activity (n = 165, 74%) and biometric data (n = 100, 45%), with a view to providing a tracking/monitoring function (n = 115, 51%) for the management of surgical patients. Opportunities exist for further work across surgical specialties involving smartphones, communications data, comparison with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), applications focusing on prediction of outcomes, monitoring, risk profiling, shared decision making, and surgical optimization. The rapidly evolving state of the art in digital phenotyping and capture of PGHD offers exciting prospects for outcome measurement in surgical care pending further work and consideration related to clinical care, technology, and implementation.

Barriers and Benefits to the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Clinical Care: A Qualitative Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey M. Philpot ◽  
Sunni A. Barnes ◽  
Rachel M. Brown ◽  
Jessica A. Austin ◽  
Cameron S. James ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Perceived Barriers ◽  
Perceived Benefits ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Patient Health

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide information on how health care affects patient health and well-being and represent a patient-centered approach. Despite this potential, PROs are not widely used in clinical settings. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with 3 stakeholder groups (patients, providers, and health care administrators) to determine the top 5 perceived barriers and benefits of PRO implementation. The Delphi technique was employed to obtain consensus and rank order responses. Patients perceived survey length to be important, whereas providers and administrators perceived time to collect data and patient health literacy, respectively, as the greatest barriers to PRO implementation. The greatest perceived benefits were the ability to track changes in clinical symptoms over time, improved quality of care, and better disease control among patients, providers, and administrators, respectively. These results may guide the development of novel frameworks for PRO implementation by addressing perceived barriers and building on the perceived benefits to encourage adoption of PROs.

Capturing and addressing emotional well-being: Utilization of ASCO’s Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) for performance improvement.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 207-207
Author(s):  
Patricia D. Hegedus ◽  
James D. Bearden ◽  
Bruce Grant
Keyword(s):  
Performance Improvement ◽  
Office Visit ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Psychological Services ◽  
Distress Thermometer ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Intervention Process ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Oncology Practice

207 Background: Palmetto Hematology Oncology (PHO) is the medical oncology practice of Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System (SRHS) and has participated in QOPI since 2009 and earned QOPI certification in September 2011. Emotional well-being assessments and documentation of interventions were selected for a performance improvement project based on QOPI measures from Fall 2009. Methods: Several articles were identified supporting the use of the NCCN Distress Thermometer following a comprehensive literature search and approval was obtained for use. The NCCN Distress Thermometer was administered to all new patients through inclusion in “new patient” paperwork packets. Two physician offices within the practice were piloted with the physicians reviewing the patient reported assessments and documenting any required interventions. All completed NCCN Distress Thermometer forms were also reviewed by the medical social work team, and for scores > 3, interventions by phone or face-to-face were completed by them and documented in the patients’ electronic medical records. Results: Due to the success of the pilot efforts the assessment/intervention process for emotional well-being was expanded throughout the PHO practice, the Gibbs Infusion Center, and Radiation Oncology. The QOPI emotional well-being indicator revealed an increase from the Fall 2009 to Spring 2012 of 36.25% to 96.25%. Conversely, our compliance with intervention by the second office visit decreased from 94.44% to 69.44%, respectively. Conclusions: Although PHO’s scores for the emotional well-being assessment have dramatically improved with implementation of the process improvement initiative, opportunity remains for improving emotional well-being intervention documentation. This initiative highlighted the lack of psychiatric/psychological services available to PHO patients. References: NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Distress Management, Version 3.2012; Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/distress.pdf . QOPI The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative; Available at: http://qopi.asco.org/program .

Determining priority symptoms of women with recurrent ovarian cancers: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 101-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi AS Donovan ◽  
Lari B. Wenzel ◽  
Sandra Ward ◽  
Susan M. Sereika ◽  
Robert P. Edwards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Sleep Disturbance ◽  
Symptom Severity ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology Group ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancers ◽  
Patient Reported

101 Background: The purpose of this study is to recommend a core set of priority symptoms to be assessed in research and clinical settings for women with recurrent ovarian cancers. Methods: We used baseline data of 497 women with recurrent ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer participating in a symptom management randomized clinical trial (GOG-0259) to identify a core index of patient-reported priority symptoms. We used the Symptom Representation Questionnaire to assess priority rankings of 28 symptoms based on four criteria: (1) symptom prevalence, (2) patient-reported symptom severity, (3) percentage of women identifying each symptom as one of top three symptoms “I would like to get better control over”, and (4) the association between symptom severity and functional wellbeing as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Ovarian. Final priority ranking included all symptoms that were ranked in the top 10 for any of the four criteria. Results: Of the original 28 symptoms, 19 were ranked in the top 10 for at least one criterion: fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, peripheral neuropathy, constipation, abdominal bloating, drowsiness, mood swings, memory problems, weight gain, nausea, sexual concerns, vomiting, hair loss, lymphedema, lack of appetite, shortness of breath, and depression. Fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain were each ranked one of the top 10 symptoms for all four criteria. Anxiety, peripheral neuropathy, and constipation were each ranked in the top 10 for three of the 4 criteria. Conclusions: We propose a core index of 19 patient-reported symptoms to be systematically assessed among patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. These symptoms are common, severe, poorly managed, and/or interfere with survivors’ functioning and can be efficiently assessed in 1-2 minutes. Systematic assessment in clinical and research settings could advance understanding about the predictors and consequences of poorly managed symptoms and could lead to more proactive, personalized interventions to improve functional well-being in this at-risk patient population.

scholarly journals Home respiratory rehabilitation: a purposes literature review focusing on the clinical pathway management

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Civitillo Claudio ◽  
Romano Angelo ◽  
Di Lorenzo Luigi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Care Pathways ◽  
Critical Pathways ◽  
Management Plans ◽  
Integrated Care Pathways ◽  
Care Maps ◽  
Respiratory Rehabilitation

Clinical Care pathways, also known as critical pathways, integrated care pathways, case management plans, clinical care pathways or care maps, are used to systematically plan and follow up a patient focused care program. Clinical pathways are used all over the world and so for respiratory rehabilitation pathways (RR) and the importance of knowledge and learning Evidence Based Practice (EBP) is well known and mandatory. However, the EBP acquisitions of the home RR model and the knowledge of Clinical Care Pathways (PCA) are poorly defined.

Toward proven and prioritized quality measures: Which ASCO QOPI and other supportive care measures associate with improved quality of life (QOL)?

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 165-165
Author(s):  
Arif Kamal ◽  
Janet Bull ◽  
Amy Pickar Abernethy
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Quality Measures ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
The Impact

165 Background: An expanding array of quality measures, including the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) metrics, is being developed for oncology. To date, evidence demonstrating the impact of each metric on outcomes, ultimately aiding in prioritization of individual measures, remains immature. We investigated the relationship between conformance with quality measures and higher patient QOL among cancer patients receiving palliative care. Methods: A comprehensive systematic review of PUBMED and the gray literature (1995-2012) identifed all described supportive care quality measures. Patients receiving palliative care in 4 community-based programs were entered into a longitudinal quality registry; analyses focused on cancer patients registered between 6/08-10/11. To find predictors of higher QOL, conformance cohorts were examined for demographic variables, performance status (measured by palliative performance scale, PPS) and provider estimation of prognosis and included in univariate and multivariate regression. Results: The systematic review yielded 303 quality measures. Of these, 18 measures, representing components of the ASCO QOPI, Hospice PEACE, and Cancer-ASSIST measure sets, were evaluable using registry data. 460 cancer patients were included. 60% of patients had weeks to 6 months expected prognosis. Among QOPI measures, conformance with two measures was significantly associated with better QOL: constipation assessment at time of narcotic prescription and emotional well-being assessment (both p<0.05). Other significant findings were conformance with screening of symptoms at first visit (p=0.017), timely treatment for uncontrolled dyspnea (p=0.005), and assessment of fatigue (p=0.007). In a multivariate model predicting higher QOL, measures involving emotional well-being assessment (OR 1.60; p=0.026) and screening of symptoms (OR 1.74, p=0.008) remained significant. Conclusions: Clinical care that conforms to quality measures reflecting regular symptom and emotional assessment is significantly associated with better patient experiences (QOL) and should be prioritized in quality assessment efforts.

Association between feeling of well-being and overall survival in advanced lung or non-colonic gastrointestinal patients receiving palliative care.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 199-199
Author(s):  
Sriram Yennu ◽  
Yu Jung Kim ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Ji Chan Park ◽  
David Hui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Advanced Lung Cancer ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Family Distress

199 Background: The aim of this study was to determine the association between feeling of well-being (FWB, 0= best, 10= worst) and overall survival in advanced lung or non-colonic gastrointestinal patients who were referred to an outpatient palliative care clinic (OPC). We also determined the predictors of severity of moderate or severe - feeling of well-being in advanced lung or non-colonic gastrointestinal patients presenting to palliative care. Methods: We reviewed the records of consecutive patients with incurable advanced lung cancer and non-colonic gastrointestinal cancer presenting to OPC. Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) scores were obtained at the initial visit between from Jan. 1, 2008-Dec. 31, 2013. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics. Clinically significant FWB was defined as ≥4/10. Overall Survival (OS) was calculated from the time of diagnosis of advanced cancer to death or last contact. Univariate analyses were performed and only significant variables were included in multivariate regression analysis to determine factors associated with severity OF FWB. Results: A total of 826 evaluable patients were analyzed (median age, 62 years; 57% male). Median ESAS FWB scores was 5 IQR (3-7). Worse FWB was significantly associated with OS (months) 6.33 (5.03, 8) vs 4.2 (3.37, 4.67) P=0.0003, from the time of diagnosis of advanced cancer. The final model of the Backwards Stepwise regression of factors associated with OS found that FWB (HR 1.09, p=0.3) was not an independent predictor of OS. ESAS FWB was significantly associated with ESAS fatigue (OR 2.31, p<0.001); anxiety (OR 1.98, p<0.001); anorexia (OR 2.31, p<0.001); CAGE positivity [alcoholism] (HR 1.80, p=0.008); and family distress (HR 1.93, p=0.002). Conclusions: Worse ESAS FWB showed univariate association with OS but it does not appear to be an independent predictor of OS when controlling for other known predictors. ESAS FWB was significantly associated with fatigue, anxiety, anorexia, CAGE positivity, and family distress, suggests that ESAS FWB may be a multidimensional screening measure for patient reported health related quality of life.

Understanding the challenges for oncologists in predicting the end-of-life phase of care in cancer patients with advanced solid tumor diagnoses.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 281-281
Author(s):  
Aaron J. Lyss ◽  
Cheryl A. Crouse ◽  
Natalie R. Dickson ◽  
Jeffrey Patton ◽  
Christopher A. Waynick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Life Phase ◽  
Community Oncology ◽  
Medicare Patients ◽  
Oncology Practice

281 Background: Early advanced care planning and palliative care improves outcomes during the end-of-life phase of care (EOL) for metastatic cancer patients. Identifying patients who are likely to transition to EOL is a necessary step to prioritize limited palliative care resources and is integral to success in value-based payment models. We analyzed whether physician documentation of prognosis in a clinical pathways system (CPS) could reliably predict when patients are nearing EOL for a large community oncology practice of more than 70 medical oncologists. Methods: Tennessee Oncology (TO) requires physicians to use CPS for all Medicare patients. CPS prompts physicians to answer the “prognostic question” “would you be surprised if this patient died in the next year?” for all OCM patients with advanced solid tumors at the beginning of treatment or at the time of a change in treatment plan. Prognostic question responses were compared to actual dates of death documented in the practice management system. Results: A total of 5,266 distinct patients were expected to trigger an OCM episode during 2017. The CPS prompted a response to the prognostic question for 1,228 (23%) of these OCM patients. There were 665 (54%) positive prognoses (expect patient to live more than 1 year) and 563 (46%) negative prognoses (expect patient to die within 1 year). Physicians documented accurate prognoses in 712 (58%) of cases. For patients with positive prognosis 557 (84%) were accurate. For patients with negative prognosis 155 (21.8%) were accurate. Conclusions: We found that for patients with terminal cancer, it is difficult for physicians to accurately predict prognosis. These findings support the importance of ASCO guidelines pertaining to patient access to palliative care during the entirety of cancer treatment for all patients with metastatic cancer. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document