Irinotecan (Iri) and buparlisib (B) in previously treated patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 655-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joaquina Celebre Baranda ◽  
Greg Reed ◽  
Stephen K. Williamson ◽  
Raymond P. Perez ◽  
Maxine L. Stoltz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Complete Analysis ◽  
Dose Titration ◽  
Human Trial ◽  
Ffpe Samples ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

655 Background: The PIK3CA pathway has oncogenic role in mCRC. Buparlisib is an oral pan-class PIK3CA inhibitor. It is currently being studied in combination trials for various malignancies. The primary objective of this phase I trial was to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for Iri plus B in pts with previously treated mCRC, with or without previous Iri therapy. We also performed PK analysis of each drug alone and in combination, determined clinical response to the combination, and evaluated achieval FFPE samples for somatic mutations in a panel of cancer associated genes, including PIK3CA for clinical correlation. Methods: A 3+3 dose titration method was used. Iri was administered intravenously every 14 days (one cycle) and B orally daily. Pts received the first dose of Iri on Cycle1 Day1. B was started 24 hours after the first dose of Iri. Safety and toxicity assessments were performed every cycle. Results: Twenty patients were enrolled: 4 in cohort 0 (Iri 120 mg/m2 + B 50 mg/d), 11 in cohort 1 (Iri 150 mg/m2 + B 50 mg/d), 5 in cohort 2 (Iri 150 mg/m2 + B 80 mg/d). The most common Grades 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia and abdominal pain. The MTD was Iri 150 mg/m2 + B 50 mg/d. The DLTs include male genital mucositis, grade 3 diarrhea, and asymptomatic grade 3 hyponatremia. In cohort 1, one pt experienced grade 2 delirium and a pt in cohort 2 had grade 3 psychosis. Of the 4 pts who received 4 cycles of therapy 2 had stable and 2 had progressive disease. No objective responses were seen. There is no significant change in the PK of Iri between Cycles 1 and 2. B at 50 mg had no consistent effect on the disposition of Iri given at 120 mg/m2 and 150 mg/m2. The Cmax and AUC for B show clear dose proportionality. Using targeted re-sequencing, a 48-gene panel that included AKT1, BRAF, KRAS, and PTEN was performed. The complete analysis of the correlative study will be presented in the meeting. Conclusions: This first human trial established that Buparlisib (50 mg qd) and Iri (150 mg/m2 q14d) are tolerable in combination. However, it is too early to determine the activity of this combination in the treatment of mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT01304602.

Trial of sequential trimetrexate, fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin in previously treated patients with gastrointestinal carcinoma.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 695-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Conti ◽  
N Kemeny ◽  
K Seiter ◽  
E Goker ◽  
W Tong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rest Period ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Gastrointestinal Carcinoma ◽  
Significant Toxicity ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Almost All

PURPOSE Trimetrexate (TMTX) is a dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, which, like methotrexate (MTX), has been shown to potentiate fluorouracil (FU) cytotoxicity by increasing phosphoribosylpyrophosphate (PRPP) levels. We investigated the safety and efficacy of a sequential TMTX/FU/leucovorin (LV) combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-one patients with advanced gastrointestinal carcinoma (mostly colorectal) received variable doses of TMTX followed 24 hours later by FU/LV (500 mg/m2 of each drug). Almost all patients had received previous chemotherapy. The initial 19 patients were treated on a 3-week-on/1-week-off schedule without any significant toxicity; the remaining patients were treated for 6 consecutive weeks followed by a 2-week rest period. TMTX was escalated in 30-mg/m2 increments from 20 to 110 mg/m2 in separate patient cohorts. When the 110-mg/m2 dose of TMTX was reached, the FU dose was escalated from 500 mg/m2 to 600 mg/m2. RESULTS The partial response (PR) rate in assessable patients with colorectal cancer (all previously treated) was 20% (seven of 35; 95% confidence interval, 7% to 33%), and with other gastrointestinal cancers was one of four patients. Median survival has not been reached with a median follow-up of 13.5 months. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was 110 mg/m2 for TMTX, 500 mg/m2 for FU, and 500 mg/m2 for LV on a 6-weeks-on/2-weeks-off cycle. The principal toxicities were grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, which occurred in 17% of patients, and hypersensitivity reactions, which occurred in 26% of patients. CONCLUSION TMTX can be administered at maximal doses in combination with FU and LV without increasing toxicity. The PR rate of 20% in advanced colorectal carcinoma patients previously treated with chemotherapy is encouraging and merits further study.

Ramucirumab (R) plus pembrolizumab (P) in treatment naive and previously treated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma: A multi-disease phase I study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4046-4046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Chau ◽  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Emiliano Calvo ◽  
Rafael Santana-Davila ◽  
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Duration ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

4046 Background: Angiogenesis and immunosuppression are hallmarks of tumor growth. This is the first study to combine R (anti-VEGFR2) with P (anti-PD-1) to simultaneously target both processes in the tumor microenvironment. Methods: Ongoing, multi-cohort, phase 1a/b trial enrolled pts with G/GEJ adenocarcinoma, measurable disease, ECOG PS 0-1, previously treated (Cohorts A and B) or untreated (Cohort A2) for advanced disease. PD-L1 was positive (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥1%) or negative (TPS < 1%) using the DAKO PD-L1 22C3 IHC pharmDx assay. R was administered at 8 mg/kg on Days 1&8 (Cohorts A and A2) or 10 mg/kg on Day 1 (Cohort B) with P 200 mg on Day 1 q3W. Primary objective- assess safety and tolerability of R+P; preliminary efficacy will be examined. Results: As of 21-Nov-2016, 41 previously treated G/GEJ pts were enrolled. Median age was 58 y, 76% male, 66% had ECOG PS of 1, 46% were PD-L1+, and 59% received study treatment as third or subsequent line. Median duration on therapy was 2.8 mo and 4.1 mo for A and B, respectively. Overall, 33 (80%) pts experienced a treatment-related AE (TRAE) and similar between cohorts A and B. Ten (24%) pts experienced grade 3-4 TRAEs, most commonly colitis (7%) and hypertension (7%). One treatment-related death occurred (pneumonitis and pulmonary sepsis). Responses occurred in 3 (7%) pts with 46% disease control rate (DCR). Progression-free and overall survival rates at 6 mo were 22.4 % (95% CI, 9.8-38.0) and 51.2% (95% CI, 33.9-66.1) respectively. Nine (22%) pts remain on treatment. Eighteen of 25 planned treatment naïve G/GEJ pts were enrolled. Median age was 70 yr, 83% male, 56% had ECOG PS of 0, and PD-L1 status is pending. Median duration on therapy was 2.1 mo. Twelve (67%) pts experienced a TRAE. Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 5 (28%) pts (hypertension [n = 3], diarrhea, and acute kidney injury). No grade 4-5 events occurred. Preliminary efficacy data showed 3 (17%) pts responded with 50% DCR. Median PFS is immature and 89% of pts remain on treatment. Conclusions: R+P generated no new safety signals and demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in treatment naïve and previously treatedadvanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Clinical trial information: NCT02443324.

RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab + ipilimumab combination in patients (pts) with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results of the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 101-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romain Cohen ◽  
Jaafar Bennouna ◽  
Julie Henriques ◽  
Christophe Tournigand ◽  
Christelle De La Fouchardiere ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

101 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICKi) are highly effective for MSI/dMMR mCRC pts. RECIST1.1 criteria are reported to underestimate response to ICKi. The GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study aimed to evaluate disease control rate (DCR) using RECIST1.1 and iRECIST for MSI/dMMR mCRC pts treated with nivolumab (NIVO) and ipilimumab (IPI). Methods: MSI/dMMR mCRC pts previously treated with fluoropyrimidines (FP), oxaliplatin (OX) and irinotecan (IRI) ± targeted therapies received NIVO 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W for 4 cycles then NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W until progression or a maximum of 20 cycles. CT-scan tumor assessments were done every 6 weeks during 24 weeks and then every 12 weeks. Primary objective was DCR at 12 weeks (12wDCR) according to RECIST1.1 and iRECIST by central review. Response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) by central review were secondary objectives. A one-stage Fleming design was used with a targeted improvement of 12wDCR from 70% to 85%. Results: Of 57 pts included between Dec 2017 and Nov 2018, 43.9% had received ≥ 3 prior lines including FP (100%), OX (100%), IRI (95.5%), antiangiogenics (57.9%) and anti-EGFRs (45.6%). 17.5% of pts had BRAF mutation and 27.5% Lynch syndrome. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 49.1% of pts, mainly hepatitis (12.3%). 12wDCR was 86.0% and 87.7% using RECIST1.1 and iRECIST respectively, with only 1 pseudo-progression (1.8%) observed during the first 12 weeks, and one later. Kappa coefficient between RECIST and iRECIST 12wDCR was 0.92 (95%CI 0.77-1.0). Best observed responses with RECIST1.1/iRECIST were: 2/2 complete responses (3.5/3.5%), 19/19 partial responses (33.3/33.3%), 30/31 stable diseases (52.6/54.4%) and 3/2 disease progressions (5.3/3.5%), with 3 pts not evaluable (cancer-related deaths before first evaluation). Conclusions: Combination of NIVO and IPI in MSI/dMMR mCRC is associated with a low frequency of pseudo-progression and high DCR rate. PFS will be evaluated in Dec 2019, with all pts having completed the predefined 1-year of ICKi therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT033501260.

Effective Dosing of Topotecan With Carboplatin in Relapsed Ovarian Cancer: A Phase I/II Study

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (13) ◽  
pp. 3255-3259 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bowman ◽  
T. Rye ◽  
G. Ross ◽  
A. Wheatley ◽  
J. F. Smyth
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Nonhematologic Toxicity ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Carboplatin Auc

PURPOSE: This phase I/II study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of administering the topoisomerase inhibitor topotecan in combination with carboplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Topotecan was given as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days, with carboplatin given immediately after topotecan on day 5. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. Carboplatin and then topotecan were escalated in sequential cohorts of three to six patients. Four dosage combinations of topotecan days 1 to 5 and carboplatin (day 5) were tested: 0.5 mg/m2/d and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) of 4, topotecan 0.5 mg/m2/d and carboplatin AUC of 5, topotecan 0.75 mg/m2/d and carboplatin AUC of 5, and topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d and carboplatin AUC of 5. RESULTS: Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was common at doses of 0.75 mg/m2/d and above, but dose-limiting hematologic toxicity occurred in only one patient. The most common reason for dose reduction or delay was failure of myelosuppression to resolve by day 21. Nonhematologic toxicity was generally mild. The maximum-tolerated dose as defined in the protocol was not reached, but topotecan dose escalation was stopped at 1.0 mg/m2/d, because delayed neutrophil recovery precluded re-treatment on a 21-day schedule. CONCLUSION: Hematologic toxicity was common but rarely serious, and the combination of topotecan with carboplatin on this schedule was safe and well tolerated. Giving carboplatin to patients after topotecan on day 5, rather than on day 1, allowed dose escalation beyond the levels reported in other studies. The recommended doses for previously treated patients are topotecan 0.75 mg/m2/d, days 1 to 5, with carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 following topotecan on day 5. The combination of topotecan 1 mg/m2/d, days 1 to 5, followed on day 5 by carboplatin at an AUC of 5, merits further examination in untreated patients.

scholarly journals Effective Dosing of Topotecan with Carboplatin in Relapsed Ovarian Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-36
Author(s):  
Md Dayem Uddin ◽  
Shafayat Habib ◽  
Shakera Sultana ◽  
Khan MMR ◽  
MN Islam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Neutrophil Recovery ◽  
Nonhematologic Toxicity ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Carboplatin Auc

Patients and Methods: Topotecan was given as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days, with carboplatin given immediately after topotecan on day 5. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. Carboplatin and then topotecan were escalated in sequential cohorts of three to six patients. Four dosage combinations of topotecan days 1 to 5 and carboplatin (day 5) were tested: 0.5 mg/m2/d and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) of 4, topotecan 0.5 mg/m2/d and carboplatin AUC of 5, topotecan 0.75 mg/m2/d and carboplatin AUC of 5, and topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d and carboplatin AUC of 5.Results: Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was common at doses of 0.75 mg/m2/d and above, but dose-limiting hematologic toxicity occurred in only one patient. The most common reason for dose reduction or delay was failure of myelosuppression to resolve by day 21. Nonhematologic toxicity was generally mild. The maximum-tolerated dose as defined in the protocol was not reached, but topotecan dose escalation was stopped at 1.0 mg/m2/d, because delayed neutrophil recovery precluded re-treatment on a 21-day schedule.Conclusion: Hematologic toxicity was common but rarely serious, and the combination of topotecan with carboplatin on this schedule was safe and well tolerated. Giving carboplatin to patients after topotecan on day 5, rather than on day 1, allowed dose escalation beyond the levels reported in other studies. The recommended doses for previously treated patients are topotecan 0.75 mg/m2/d, days 1 to 5, with carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 following topotecan on day 5. The combination of topotecan 1 mg/m2/d, days 1 to 5, followed on day 5 by carboplatin at an AUC of 5, merits further examination in untreated patients.TAJ 2016; 29(2): 31-36

scholarly journals Belinostat in combination with standard cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone as first-line treatment for patients with newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell lymphoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick B. Johnston ◽  
Amanda F. Cashen ◽  
Petros G. Nikolinakos ◽  
Anne W. Beaven ◽  
Stefan Klaus Barta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Belinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor approved for relapsed refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of belinostat combined with CHOP (Bel-CHOP). Secondary objectives included safety/tolerability, overall response rate (ORR), and belinostat pharmacokinetics (PK). Methods Patients were ≥ 18 years with histologically confirmed, previously untreated PTCL. Patients received belinostat (1000 mg/m2 once daily) + standard CHOP for 6 cycles with varying schedules using a 3 + 3 design in Part A. Part B enrolled patients at MTD dose. Results Twenty-three patients were treated. One patient experienced DLT (Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity) on Day 1–3 schedule, resulting in escalation to Day 1–5 schedule (n = 3). No DLTs were observed and Day 1–5 schedule with 1000 mg/m2 was declared as MTD. Twelve additional patients were enrolled in Part B using MTD. Median relative dose intensity was 98%. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), including nausea (78%), fatigue (61%), and vomiting (57%). Serious AEs occurred in 43%, with febrile neutropenia (17%) and pyrexia (13%). Overall ORR was 86% with 71% reported CR at MTD. Belinostat PK parameters were similar to single-agent. Conclusions Bel-CHOP was well tolerated and MTD in CHOP combination was the same dose and schedule as single agent dosing. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01839097.

Endometriumkarzinom: Kombination aus Lenvatinib und Pembrolizumab zeigt Wirksamkeit unabhängig vom Mikrosatellitenstatus

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Sarah Matz
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Carcinoma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Prior Systemic Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

<b>Purpose:</b> Patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma have limited treatment options. We report final primary efficacy analysis results for a patient cohort with advanced endometrial carcinoma receiving lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in an ongoing phase Ib/II study of selected solid tumors. <b>Methods:</b> Patients took lenvatinib 20 mg once daily orally plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks, in 3-week cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) at 24 weeks (ORRWk24); secondary efficacy end points included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Tumor assessments were evaluated by investigators per immune-related RECIST. <b>Results:</b> At data cutoff, 108 patients with previously treated endometrial carcinoma were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 18.7 months. The ORRWk24 was 38.0% (95% CI, 28.8% to 47.8%). Among subgroups, the ORRWk24 (95% CI) was 63.6% (30.8% to 89.1%) in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high tumors (n = 11) and 36.2% (26.5% to 46.7%) in patients with microsatellite-stable tumors (n = 94). For previously treated patients, regardless of tumor MSI status, the median DOR was 21.2 months (95% CI, 7.6 months to not estimable), median PFS was 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 8.7 months), and median OS was 16.7 months (15.0 months to not estimable). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 83/124 (66.9%) patients. <b>Conclusion:</b> Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma who have experienced disease progression after prior systemic therapy, regardless of tumor MSI status. The combination therapy had a manageable toxicity profile. <b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02501096.

Pentostatin and Cyclophosphamide: An Effective New Regimen in Previously Treated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 1278-1284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Weiss ◽  
Peter G. Maslak ◽  
Joseph G. Jurcic ◽  
David A. Scheinberg ◽  
Timothy B. Aliff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Severe Nausea ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Purine Analogs ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose: Purine analogs and alkylators are important agents in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Previously, combinations of fludarabine and chlorambucil were abandoned because of increased toxicity from overlapping myelosuppression and immunosuppression. Of the purine analogs active in CLL, pentostatin may be least myelosuppressive. We hypothesized that combining pentostatin with cyclophosphamide would have less myelotoxicity than combinations using other purine analogs. Patients and Methods: We studied 23 patients with previously treated CLL. All patients received pentostatin 4 mg/m2. Seventeen patients received cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, and six patients received cyclophosphamide 900 mg/m2. Both drugs were administered on day 1 of each cycle, and cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for six treatments. Filgrastim, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, and acyclovir were administered prophylactically. The median number of prior treatment regimens was three (range, one to five) with 13 patients (57%) refractory to prior fludarabine therapy. Results: The cyclophosphamide 900 mg/m2 dose level was associated with moderate to severe nausea, and we chose cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 as the dose for further study. There were 17 responses (74%; 95% confidence interval, 63% to 85%), including four complete responses. The response rate was 77% in fludarabine-refractory patients. Myelosuppression was acceptable with grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, seen in 35% and 30% of patients, respectively. The relative sparing of thrombopoiesis can be seen in that only one patient (5%) with an initial platelet count of more than 20,000 required platelet transfusions while receiving therapy. Conclusion: Pentostatin 4 mg/m2 with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 is safe and effective in previously treated patients with CLL. On the basis of these results, we are currently studying pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (PCR) therapy in patients with CLL.

Phase I clinical and pharmacologic study of weekly cisplatin combined with weekly irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 3858-3865 ◽  
Author(s):  
L B Saltz ◽  
D Spriggs ◽  
L J Schaaf ◽  
G K Schwartz ◽  
D Ilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Irinotecan Dose ◽  
Pharmacologic Study

PURPOSE In vitro synergy between cisplatin and irinotecan (CPT-11) has been reported. We designed a combination schedule of these agents to maximize the potential for synergistic interaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS To maximize the opportunity for synergy, we divided the cisplatin into four consecutive weekly treatments, followed by a 2-week rest. Each dose of cisplatin was immediately followed by a dose of irinotecan. The dose of cisplatin was fixed at 30 mg/m2/wk. The initial irinotecan dose was 50 mg/m2/wk and this was escalated by 30% increments in successive cohorts of three to six patients to establish the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G), were analyzed. RESULTS Of 35 patients with solid tumors enrolled onto this trial, 30 were assessable for toxicity and response. The MTD for this regimen was 30 mg/m2/wk of cisplatin plus 50 mg/m2/wk of irinotecan in previously treated patients and 30 mg/m2/wk of cisplatin plus 65 mg/m2/wk of irinotecan in chemotherapy-naive patients. Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) encountered in this trial. Diarrhea was infrequent and rarely dose-limiting. Seven of 30 assessable patients achieved a partial response. No alteration in irinotecan, SN-38, or SN-38G pharmacokinetics resulted from the administration of cisplatin with irinotecan. CONCLUSION The administration of cisplatin and irinotecan on this weekly schedule provides a practical and well-tolerated regimen that has the potential to maximize any clinical synergy between the two agents. Evidence of substantial clinical activity was seen in this phase I study.

Phase I evaluation of AZD2171, a highly potent and selective inhibitor of VEGFR signaling, in combination with selected chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3034-3034 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Lorusso ◽  
E. Heath ◽  
M. Valdivieso ◽  
M. Pilat ◽  
A. Wozniak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Selective Inhibitor ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

3034 Background: AZD2171 is an oral, potent, selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR). Trials have demonstrated that inhibition of the VEGF pathway, in combination with certain chemotherapy, provides benefit to patients with a broad range of solid tumors. Methods: This Phase I trial was conducted in heavily pretreated solid tumor patients. In a single protocol, escalating doses of AZD2171 were evaluated (20, 30 and 45 mg) in combination with four separate chemotherapy regimens: mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2; 5-FU 400 mg/m2; leucovorin 400 mg/m2 q2 weeks; Arm 1); irinotecan 300 mg/m2 q3 week (Arm 2); docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (Arm 3) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (Arm 4). The primary objective was to evaluate safety and tolerability of the combinations and secondary objective to evaluate pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction and clinical efficacy. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) toxicity was defined through two cycles. Results: 46 patients have been enrolled: 28/35 evaluable for efficacy/toxicity. The MTD has been reached in two arms: Arm 2 - 20 mg AZD2171 and Arm 4 - 30 mg AZD2171. Arm 3 enrollment continues at 45 mg AZD2171. Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in eight patients at 30 mg AZD2171 in Arm 1. Enrollment of an additional cohort of less heavily pre-treated patients is ongoing to determine the tolerability of 30 mg AZD2171 with FOLFOX. DLTs have included grade 3 fatigue in Arms 1, 2 & 4; grade 3 diarrhea in Arm 1; grade 3 hand-foot syndrome & grade 4 neutropenic fever in Arm 2; and grade 3 hypertension in Arm 4. AZD2171 did not appear to have a major effect on the PK profile of any chemotherapy regimen tested. Steady-state values are comparable with AZD2171 monotherapy. There have been 13 responses (minor response, n=5; partial response, n=6; complete response, n=2; stable disease ≥ 4 cycles, n=6) in heavily pretreated patients, some having demonstrated resistance to identical chemotherapies. Duration of response has been impressive (4-22+ cycles). Conclusions: AZD2171 combinations have been well tolerated with expected toxicities and encouraging responses. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document