Prevalence of radiologic evidence of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at first post-operative restaging studies in patients (pts) undergoing pancreatic cancer surgery with curative intent.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 225-225
Author(s):  
Sofia Palacio ◽  
Peter Joel Hosein ◽  
Joe U Levi ◽  
Jaime R. Merchan ◽  
Jorge Monge ◽  
...  

225 Background: Surgical resection is the only potentially curative modality for PDAC. However, even after a successful surgical resection outcomes are poor due to both local and distant disease recurrence. Patients with early recurrence likely derive no benefit from surgery and could be considered for a non-surgical approach as initial therapy. Since the incidence of recurrent/metastatic disease at first post-operative staging scan is not well documented, our aim was to determine this incidence. Methods: This IRB-approved analysis identified all pts diagnosed with resectable PDAC that underwent surgery with intent to cure at the University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2010 and 2012. Patients with imaging before and within 6 months after surgery were included. All post-operative CT scans performed within 3 months after surgery were reviewed for the presence of recurrent and/or metastatic disease. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Data from105 pts were analyzed. Mean age was 61, 63% were male, 91% had adenocarcinoma, 84% had disease in the head of the pancreas. 11 out of 85 (13%) pts had recurrent/metastatic disease detected on first post-operative CT scan; 64% stage IIB and 73% had positive lymph nodes. 54 out of 105 (51%) had disease progression. 60% had local recurrence, 40% had distant metastasis. The mean time from preoperative CT scan to surgery was 35 days. Patients with early and late recurrence had similar OS from diagnosis (median 27.7 and 27.1 months, respectively) but worse than those with no disease recurrence (median not reached, OS rate 78% at 36 months). Conclusions: The relatively high incidence (13%) of early recurrence in this retrospective cohort suggests that further studies aimed at improving patient selection for surgery are warranted and provides a strong rationale for the use of neoadjuvant therapy to select patients with early disease progression who would not have benefitted from surgery.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18610-e18610
Author(s):  
Khaled Alhamad ◽  
Nada Alrifai ◽  
Abraham Attah Attah ◽  
Karthik Shankar ◽  
Lynna Alnimer ◽  
...  

e18610 Background: Early stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) account for up to 30% of newly diagnosed patients. Until recently, the mainstay of treatment remained curative-intent surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. More recently, the incorporation of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has demonstrated clinical benefit. The two commonly used regimens are 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX), or Gemcitabine and nab-Paclitaxel. Limited data is available to differentiate outcomes between the 2 common NAT regimens. We conducted a retrospective review to assess the rates of disease recurrence and progression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to identify any associations that may predict early recurrence. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients diagnosed with PDAC from 2017-2019 at Allegheny General Hospital. Data analysis was completed using IBM SPSS v23. Disease recurrence or progression was assessed radiologically, and time to progression was calculated as time (months) since diagnosis to evidence of radiological progression. Results: Out of 171 patients reviewed, 56 were deemed resectable or borderline resectable and underwent curative-intent surgery and were included in the analysis. Median age was 68, and 12 (41%) were male. Majority of the patients were white (90%). 29 (52%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy: 16 (55%) received FOLFIRINOX, 12 (41%) received Gemcitabine with nab-Paclitaxel, and 1 received another regimen. 9 patients out of 16 (56%) that received FOLFIRINOX progressed, and 5 out of 12 patients (42%) who received Gemcitabine with nab-Paclitaxel progressed. Patterns of progression in those that received FOLFIRINOX: 1 (11%) within 6 months, 4 (44%) between 6-12 months, and 4 (44%) after 12 months. Of those that received Gemcitabine with nab-Paclitaxel, 2 (40%) progressed within 6 months, 1 (20%) progressed between 6-12 months, and 2 (40%) progressed after 12 months. On multivariate analysis, no association was identified to predict progression. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in disease progression rates among patients that received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine and nab-Paclitaxel (42% vs. 56%; p = 0.46). No predictive associations were identified in patients with disease recurrence. Study limitations include a low sample size and retrospective analysis. Further, larger scale studies are warranted to better assess the difference in rates of progression after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine and nab-Paclitaxel.[Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 123 (4) ◽  
pp. 815-822
Author(s):  
Joanne Guerlain ◽  
Fabienne Haroun ◽  
Alexandra Voicu ◽  
Charles Honoré ◽  
Franck Griscelli ◽  
...  

F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1445 ◽  
Author(s):  
LanLan Zhou ◽  
David T. Dicker ◽  
Elizabeth Matthew ◽  
Wafik S. El-Deiry ◽  
R. Katherine Alpaugh

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were added to the arsenal of clinical testing in 2004 for three cancer types: metastatic breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. CTCs were found to be an independent prognostic indicator of survival for these three diseases. Multiple enrichment/isolation strategies have been developed and numerous assay applications have been performed using both single and pooled captured/enriched CTCs. We have reviewed the isolation techniques and touched on many analyses. The true utility of a CTC is that it acts as a “silent” predictor of metastatic disease. The mere presence of a single CTC is an indication that disease has spread from the primary site. Comments and suggestions have been set forth for CTCs and cell-free DNA to be used as a screening panel for the early detection of disease recurrence and metastatic spread, providing the opportunity for early intervention with curative intent to treat metastatic disease.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16088-e16088
Author(s):  
Dwight Hall Owen ◽  
Sandipkumar Patel ◽  
John E Phay ◽  
Lawrence Andrew Shirley ◽  
Lawrence S Kirschner ◽  
...  

e16088 Background: ACC is a rare malignancy with limited data to guide management of metastatic disease. Prior research regarding survival has focused on pts with locoregional disease, but has not offered insight into the management and outcomes of pts with metastatic disease. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients (pts) with metastatic ACC who were treated with systemic therapy between January 2000 and October 2016 at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for survival analysis. Results: A total of 18 pts received systemic therapy for distant metastatic disease. Median age at diagnosis was 51 (range 31 – 72). Median overall survival (OS) from time of diagnosis of ACC was 15.5 months (95% CI 4.8 – 28.2), and from time of systemic treatment (ST) was 7.1 months (95% CI 3.3 – 26). A germline variant of uncertain significance in MSH2 (c.138C > G) was identified in one patient. Baseline FDG-PET scans were obtained in 11/18 pts, and demonstrated avidity in all patients. Maximum SUV ranged from 4.1 to 47.6, with a median of 15. First line therapy was etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and mitotane (EDPM) in 13/18 pts and clinical trial with IMC-A12 (IGF-1 receptor antibody) in four pts. Median duration of first line therapy was 1.8 months (95% CI 0.9 – 2.8). Survival was not statistically different for patients receiving EDPM as first or second line therapy (median OS 23.3 vs 12.0 months, p = 0.96). Additional lines of therapy included EDPM, IMC-A12, AT-101, mifepristone, OSI-906 (IGF-1R inhibitor), and nivolumab. Median lines of therapy given were 2. The presence of bone metastases (p = 0.69) or lung metastases (p = 0.21) at the time of initiation of ST was not associated with OS from ST. Conclusions: In our experience, the prognosis of pts with metastatic ACC receiving systemic therapy is poor with most pts receiving ≤ 2 lines of therapy. Patients receiving first or second line EDPM seemed to have worse outcomes than noted in previously published trials, possibly due to our patients being sicker at baseline. Metastasis to the lung or bone at initiation of ST did not impact OS.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 59-59
Author(s):  
Sheetal Mehta Kircher ◽  
Sofia M Garcia ◽  
Megan Rae Oden ◽  
Aubri Veneruso ◽  
June M. Mckoy ◽  
...  

59 Background: Standard 3.3 of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) patient-centered care guidelines requires that accredited institutions deliver SCPs to all patients completing cancer treatment with curative intent (10% of eligible patients in 2015 and increasing incrementally to 100% in 2019). Implementation of SCP delivery has been challenging and limited to date. We describe our implementation process at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center. Methods: We established a multidisciplinary working group that developed and administered a survey of providers’ attitudes towards SCPs and preferences for delivery, assessed clinical workflows, then developed and vetted customized SCP templates within the electronic health record (EHR) and two complimentary SCP delivery models. Results: Twelve providers completed the survey (6 physicians, 5 advanced practice providers [APPs], 1 nurse). 67% viewed SCPs as feasible within workflows, 75% felt designated survivorship clinicians were best equipped to deliver SCPs; All reported SCPs were beneficial to patients; and 92% felt SCPs were beneficial to inter-provider communication. Cited barriers were: time and staff required and non-optimal billing. To harmonize with existing workflows, we established two delivery models: (1) clinical groups with a low volume of survivors relative to available nursing staff complete and deliver SCPs themselves; (2) clinical groups with high volumes of survivors relative to available nursing staff refer patients to a centralized survivorship clinic where SCPs are delivered by designated survivorship APPs. All elements of the ASCO templates were incorporated into our EHR templates. We reduced free-text data entry by designing templates where 20% of the fields are auto-populated from existing EHR data and another 65% use drop-down menus. Mean completion time is 12 minutes (range 10-30 minutes; n= 30). Conclusions: CoC-accredited institutions across the nation are working to meet Standard 3.3. We present our experiences developing and implementing SCP delivery models, including lessons learned to inform models of survivorship care under development at other institutions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 163-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Small ◽  
Jeffrey Belkora ◽  
Melanie Catherine Majure ◽  
Amy Jo Chien ◽  
Michelle E. Melisko ◽  
...  

163 Background: ASCO recommends palliative care (PC) concurrently with oncologic treatment for patients with metastatic disease and there is emerging data about the benefits of early PC. However, little is known about referral patterns to specialty PC among patients who die of metastatic breast cancer. Methods: After years of offering a stand-alone outpatient PC consult service in our comprehensive cancer center, we established an integrated PC program in breast oncology (the “Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) Program”) with a care coordinator, PC physician, and co-location with oncology. Among patients who died, we analyzed referral patterns, program participation, and end-of-life quality outcomes from October 2014 through May 2015. Results: 38 of 108 patients (35.2%) referred to and seen in ABC died, with an average of 2.9 PC visits (range 1-17) and 7 months (range 0-20) between referral and death. Reasons for referral among ABC patients who died included: symptom management (15 patients, 39.5%); goals of care discussions (12, 31.6%); psychosocial support (5, 13.2%); discharge referral from the inpatient PC team (4, 10.5%); and new diagnosis of metastatic disease (3, 7.9%). At the time of referral, average time since metastatic diagnosis was 23.6 months (range: 0-106); 10 patients (26.3%) had received > 3 lines of treatment. 15 referred patients (13.9%) died but were not seen by ABC: of those, 6 initiated hospice before they could be seen; 5 initially declined or deferred the referral but then were too sick to be seen in clinic by the time they agreed; and 4 were unwilling to accept extra appointments or did not follow-up to repeated outreach. 24 ABC patients who died (63.2%) were seen early (> 90 days before death), whereas in the year prior to the ABC clinic, among patients who died, only 11 of 44 (25%) who had received PC consultation received it early. 19 of 33 (57.6%) ABC patients for whom data was available utilized hospice, with only 2 (5.3%) using hospice < 3 days. Conclusions: Embedding and integrating a PC practice in breast oncology resulted in patients being seen earlier. Future efforts should be directed at further increases in earlier referrals by oncologists and in facilitating patient acceptance of early referrals.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15736-e15736
Author(s):  
Siddharth Kunte ◽  
Swathi Sangli ◽  
Alejandro Lemor ◽  
Maeve Aine Lowery ◽  
Kenneth H. Yu ◽  
...  

e15736 Background: PDAC is a leading and rising cause of cancer-related mortality. There is infrequent description of patients and outcomes with PDAC diagnosed aged <=50 years old (Early onset PC: EOPC). We reviewed the epidemiology, risk factors, oncologic outcomes and genomic data of EOPC pts at MSKCC. Methods: Using an institutional dataline search, N=364 patients were identified with EOPC between 2008-2014 at MSKCC. N= 282 were included in final analysis based on data completeness. Results: Baseline characteristics are summarized in table 1. The average patient was male, aged between 40- 50 years, BMI 24 and had metastatic disease at diagnosis. Family history of malignancy was present in N= 216 patients. The median overall survival (OS) for stages IIA, IIB, III and IV was 19.2, 21.8, 18.8 and 9.7 months respectively. Age, gender, diabetes and smoking history did not have a significant impact on OS. No difference in OS was noted between the groups who received gemcitabine based first-line chemotherapy compared to those with 5-fluorouracil based regimen in metastatic disease (9.9 vs 12 months, p= 0.315). Conclusions: EOPC represents a small subset of patients with PDAC and very rarely arises < 30 years of age. For this MSKCC cohort, outcomes appear similar to patients with average age onset PDAC. Further analyses on genomic characteristics may provide insight into outcomes and genetic underpinnings of EOPC. [Table: see text]


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 123-123
Author(s):  
Umang Swami ◽  
Varun Monga ◽  
Yousef Zakharia ◽  
Mohammed M. Milhem

123 Background: Regulatory T cells are increased in melanoma pts and are postulated to impair objective response to immune therapies. Pembro blocks programmed death receptor-1, reverses T-cell suppression and induces antitumor activity. Continuous low dose TMZ has immunomodulatory effects resulting in selective CD4+ lymphopenia of which the T-reg population of CD4+/CD25+ T cells could be decreased significantly. TMZ has demonstrated dramatic responses after IL-2 in metastatic melanoma pts. We evaluated responses with sequential TMZ after progression on pembro in pts with metastatic melanoma. Methods: Medical records of pts with metastatic melanoma treated with pembro and TMZ at Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center between 1/1/2011 and 8/31/2016 were reviewed. Recorded data included BRAF mutation status, treatment doses, serological markers, duration of treatment and treatment related responses (immune RECIST and RECIST 1.1). Results: Overall 10 pts (7 males, 3 females) with metastatic melanoma received sequential pembro followed by TMZ after disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Eight were BRAF negative and 7 were pretreated with ipilimumab. Median age at time of initiating pembro (2 mg/kg every 3 weeks) was 64 years (range 33-75). Pts received a median of 4 doses (2-19). Median duration of treatment was 88 days (41-464) with stable disease in 3, progressive disease (PD) in 6 and 1 not evaluable for response. All pts thereafter received TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily for 6 weeks on 8 week cycle except 1 who received 200 mg/m2 for 5 days every 4 weeks) after a median of 21.5 days (12-34) from last pembro dose. Median duration on treatment with TMZ was 75 days (20-198) resulting in 1 complete response, 1 partial response, 6 PD and 2 not evaluable for response. Pts with response to TMZ had a higher median baseline lymphocyte count at the time of initiation of pembro (4131 vs. 1715 k/uL, p < 0.05) as well as TMZ (2335 vs. 965 k/uL, p = 0.08) as compared to pts without a response. Conclusions: TMZ is an interesting alternative for metastatic melanoma pts with disease progression on pembro. Our results show a 25% response rate. Further studies in this setting are warranted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document