The impact of HPV infection on survival of patients with non-oropharyngeal head and neck cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6048-6048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samer Alsidawi ◽  
Gustavo Figueiredo Marcondes Westin ◽  
Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar ◽  
Scott H. Okuno ◽  
Katharine Andress Rowe Price
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Hpv Infection ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Hpv Status ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Impact

6048 Background: The role of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection in non-oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (non-OPSCC) of the head and neck is unknown. Current available studies have yielded conflicting results due to limited number of patients. We present a large analysis from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) evaluating HPV-positive non-OPSCC. Methods: Using the NCDB registry, we included adults diagnosed with non-OPSCC from 2004-2012 with available HPV status. A cohort of patients with OPSCC was analyzed for HPV prevalence comparison. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method and stratified using HPV-status. The prognostic effect of variables was studied using Cox proportional hazards models. The JMP software was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 8726 non-OPSCC patients were identified and primary sites included the oral cavity (50%), larynx (41%) and hypopharynx (9%). 11% of non-OPSCC patients had evidence of infection with high-risk HPV strains compared to 61% of OPSCC patients. HPV-positive non-OPSCC patients presented at slightly younger age, had more advanced stage and higher tumor grade compared to HPV-negative patients (P < 0.01). HPV-positive non-OPSCC patients had better survival than HPV-negative patients (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.93, P < 0.01) and this was most pronounced in patients with locally advanced disease (5-year survival 50% versus 40%, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.6-0.8, P < 0.01). A univariate and multivariate analysis were performed adjusting for age, sex, race, stage, primary site, Charlson/Deyo comorbidity score, financial income, tumor grade, surgery, radiation and chemotherapy administration. Smoking history was unavailable. HPV positivity was an independent predictor of better survival in non-OPSCC in multivariate analysis (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59-0.8, P < 0.01). Conclusions: HPV infection is seen in a subset of patients with non-OPSCC head and neck cancer and these present with more advanced tumors. The survival of patients with HPV-positive non-OPSCC is significantly better than HPV-negative tumors. Routine HPV testing and enrollment in treatment de-intensification clinical trials similar to OPSCC might be appropriate for this patient population.

Critical Impact of Radiotherapy Protocol Compliance and Quality in the Treatment of Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: Results From TROG 02.02

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18) ◽  
pp. 2996-3001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lester J. Peters ◽  
Brian O'Sullivan ◽  
Jordi Giralt ◽  
Thomas J. Fitzgerald ◽  
Andy Trotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Treatment Center ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Protocol Compliance ◽  
The Impact

Purpose To report the impact of radiotherapy quality on outcome in a large international phase III trial evaluating radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin plus tirapazamine for advanced head and neck cancer. Patients and Methods The protocol required interventional review of radiotherapy plans by the Quality Assurance Review Center (QARC). All plans and radiotherapy documentation underwent post-treatment review by the Trial Management Committee (TMC) for protocol compliance. Secondary review of noncompliant plans for predicted impact on tumor control was performed. Factors associated with poor protocol compliance were studied, and outcome data were analyzed in relation to protocol compliance and radiotherapy quality. Results At TMC review, 25.4% of the patients had noncompliant plans but none in which QARC-recommended changes had been made. At secondary review, 47% of noncompliant plans (12% overall) had deficiencies with a predicted major adverse impact on tumor control. Major deficiencies were unrelated to tumor subsite or to T or N stage (if N+), but were highly correlated with number of patients enrolled at the treatment center (< five patients, 29.8%; ≥ 20 patients, 5.4%; P < .001). In patients who received at least 60 Gy, those with major deficiencies in their treatment plans (n = 87) had a markedly inferior outcome compared with those whose treatment was initially protocol compliant (n = 502): −2 years overall survival, 50% v 70%; hazard ratio (HR), 1.99; P < .001; and 2 years freedom from locoregional failure, 54% v 78%; HR, 2.37; P < .001, respectively. Conclusion These results demonstrate the critical importance of radiotherapy quality on outcome of chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Centers treating only a few patients are the major source of quality problems.

scholarly journals 489 Assessing the Impact Of COVID-19 On Head and Neck Cancer Treatment and Preparing for The Next Wave

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Daga ◽  
L Argus ◽  
J Goswami
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Tnm Staging ◽  
World Health ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction As of 11th of March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) a pandemic. It is estimated that urgent cancer referrals have reduced 70-89% across hospitals in England during the COVID-19 pandemic, in addition to reductions in attendance for the different treatment arms. The aim of our investigation is to assess the impact of COVID-19 on MDT outcomes and patients attending/receiving treatment as compared to before for head and neck cancer. Method Data was collected retrospectively over a period of 203 days (7th January to 28th July 2020), including 66 patients prior to COVID-19 being declared a pandemic and 116 patients since, at a regional cancer centre. A total of 182 patients undergoing treatment were identified. These patients were assessed by TNM staging, MDT outcomes and final initial treatment intents, which were compared to pre-COVID outcomes. Results With respect to MDT outcomes, there was an increase in the number of patients decided for surgery from 10.61% to 23.28% (p = 0.78) during the first wave of the pandemic. Patients decided for radiotherapy and chemotherapy increased by 12.49% and 4.31% respectively. Notably, there was a decrease in further investigations and referrals from 37.88% to 18.10%. Moreover, an increase in palliative treatment intent by 10.55% was noted during the pandemic. Conclusions As the UK enters into the next peak of the pandemic, with reduced capacity for elective surgery and outpatient clinics, it is essential to consider its impact on the standard of care delivered to current cancer patients.

scholarly journals Evaluating predictive factors for toxicities experienced by head & neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xenia Ray ◽  
Whitney Sumner ◽  
Leisa Sutton ◽  
Parag Sanghvi ◽  
Ida Deichaite ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Hpv Status ◽  
Dose Metrics ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Dysphagia Outcomes

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate if HPV status serves as an independent predictor of early and late dysphagia outcomes when considered alongside standard patient characteristics and dose metrics for head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Methods and materials The age, sex, smoking history, cancer type (oropharyngeal vs non-oropharyngeal), HPV status, and early and late dysphagia outcomes were obtained for 99 retrospective head and neck cancer patients treated at our clinic with radiotherapy. Additionally for each patient, the mean radiation dose to the pharynx, superior/middle/inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscles, and cricopharyngeus was calculated. The predictive power of these clinical characteristics and radiation metrics was evaluated using chi-square tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. Then multi-variate logistic models were built for each outcome using a single dose metric at a time, and either HPV status, cancer type, or both. Multi-variate models were built using both top-down and bottom-up technique to establish the most predictive independent covariates. Results In the univariate analysis for early dysphagia, cancer type (p = 0.04) and four dose metrics (p ≤ 0.02) were significantly associated with outcome, while for late dysphagia, only cancer type (p = 0.04) was associated with outcome. In the multivariate analysis for early dysphagia, cancer type, smoking history, and mean dose to the five structures were consistently selected as covariates. For late dysphagia, either HPV status or cancer type was selected in each model and the mean dose to the cricopharyngeus was selected in one model. Conclusion While HPV is a known contributing factor for tumor prognosis in oropharyngeal cancers, its role in normal tissue toxicities for head and neck cancers has not previously been evaluated. Our results indicate having an oropharyngeal cancer may increase a patient’s risk of high-grade early and late dysphagia while HPV status was seldom selected.

The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on suspected head and neck cancer two-week-wait referrals

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
N Bhamra ◽  
B Gorman ◽  
W Arnold ◽  
A Rajah ◽  
K Jolly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Increasing Mean Age of Head and Neck Cancer Patients at a German Tertiary Referral Center

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 832
Author(s):  
Julius M. Vahl ◽  
Marlene C. Wigand ◽  
Michael Denkinger ◽  
Dhayana Dallmeier ◽  
Chiara Steiger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Catchment Area ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Tertiary Referral ◽  
Tertiary Referral Center ◽  
Referral Center ◽  
The Impact

Background: The impact of demographic change on the age at diagnosis in German head and neck cancer (HNC) patients is unclear. Here we present an evaluation of aging trends in HNC at a tertiary referral center. Methods: Retrospective cohort study on aging trends at the initial diagnosis of newly diagnosed patients with HNC between 2004 and 2018 at the head and neck cancer center Ulm in relation to demographic data of the catchment area. Results: The study population consisted of 2450 individuals diagnosed with HNC with a mean age of 62.84 (±11.67) years. We observed a significant increase in annual incidence rates and mean age over time. Mean age among HNC patients increased significantly more than among the population in the catchment area. Whereas the incidence rate of patients <50 years did not change, the incidence of HNC patients aged ≥70 years increased the most. The mean patient age in the main tumor sites increased significantly. Surprisingly, HPV-positive patients were not younger than HPV-negative patients, but showed a non-significant trend towards a higher mean age (63.0 vs. 60.7 years). Conclusions: Increasing incidence rates in older patients pose a challenge for health care systems. A nationwide study is needed to assess the dynamics and impact of aging on the incidence of HNC.

scholarly journals Impacts of Environmental Factors on Head and Neck Cancer Pathogenesis and Progression

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 389
Author(s):  
Marisol Miranda-Galvis ◽  
Reid Loveless ◽  
Luiz Paulo Kowalski ◽  
Yong Teng
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Environmental Factors ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Environmental Drivers ◽  
Cancer Pathogenesis ◽  
Gene Environment ◽  
The Impact

Epidemiological and clinical studies over the past two decades have provided strong evidence that genetic elements interacting with environmental components can individually and collectively influence one’s susceptibility to cancer. In addition to tumorigenic properties, numerous environmental factors, such as nutrition, chemical carcinogens, and tobacco/alcohol consumption, possess pro-invasive and pro-metastatic cancer features. In contrast to traditional cancer treatment, modern therapeutics not only take into account an individual’s genetic makeup but also consider gene–environment interactions. The current review sharpens the focus by elaborating on the impact that environmental factors have on the pathogenesis and progression of head and neck cancer and the underlying molecular mechanisms involved. Recent advances, challenges, and future perspectives in this area of research are also discussed. Inhibiting key environmental drivers of tumor progression should yield survival benefits for patients at any stage of head and neck cancer.

Lymphoedema after head and neck cancer treatment: an overview for clinical practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (Sup4) ◽  
pp. S24-S29
Author(s):  
Claire Jeans ◽  
Bena Brown ◽  
Elizabeth C Ward ◽  
Anne E Vertigan
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Lymphatic System ◽  
Review Article ◽  
Psychological Issues ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Face ◽  
Protein Rich ◽  
The Impact

Lymphoedema is a disorder of the lymphatic system that presents as an atypical swelling and accumulation of protein-rich fluid within the interstitial spaces. Head and neck lymphoedema (HNL) is highly prevalent in patients who have been treated for head and neck cancer (HNC) and may manifest externally on the face and neck; internally within the oral cavity, pharynx or larynx; or as a combination of both. HNL is known to contribute to a wide range of physical, functional and psychological issues, and presents several unique challenges in terms of its management. This review article provides an overview of HNL for clinicians and aims to improve awareness of this condition and the impact it has on patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document