Phase Ib study of tepotinib in EGFR-mutant/c-Met-positive NSCLC: Final data and long-term responders.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8547-8547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Long Wu ◽  
Ross A. Soo ◽  
Dong-Wan Kim ◽  
James Chih-Hsin Yang ◽  
Jürgen Scheele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Good Tolerability ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Final Data ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Egfr Tki

8547 Background: Patients (pts) with NSCLC that is initially responsive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKI) typically develop resistance, often associated with aberrant c-Met activity. Dual inhibition of EGFR and c-Met is therefore a rational option to treat c-Met+ EGFR TKI-resistant NSCLC. Tepotinib is a highly selective c-Met inhibitor with good tolerability and promising activity against solid tumors. We report final data from a phase Ib trial of tepotinib + gefitinib in pts with c-Met+/EGFR-mutant NSCLC conducted in Asia. Methods: Eligible pts were adults with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC and ECOG PS 0–1. Tumors had to express EGFR with an activating mutation be resistant to EGFR TKI therapy and be c-Met+ by IHC. Pts received tepotinib 300 or 500 mg QD combined with gefitinib 250 mg QD (T300G250 or T500G250). The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of tepotinib in combination with gefitinib; secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and antitumor activity. Results: 18 pts were enrolled (median age 65 [41–78]; 8 male); 6 received T300G250, 12 T500G250. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and tepotinib 500 mg QD was confirmed as the RP2D. 17 pts experienced treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TRTEAEs), mostly grade ≤2 and most commonly diarrhea (12), rash (8), and amylase increase (6). Grade ≥3 TRTEAEs were increased amylase (n = 4), increased lipase (3), neutropenia (1), and hyperglycemia (1). The best overall response was partial response in 6 pts; 4/7 pts with IHC 3+ tumors responded (all treated with T500G250) vs 2/11 with IHC 2+ tumors. Response durations of pts with PR were 4.2–12.5 months. 4/18 pts (IHC 2+, n = 3) had stable disease. 8 pts experienced progression free survival > 5 months, 3 pts > 10 months. PK were as expected from previous studies. Conclusions: Tepotinib in combination with gefitinib was well tolerated. The RP2D of tepotinib for use in combination with gefitinib in NSCLC is 500 mg QD. T500G250 showed signs of activity against c-Met+ tumors. A phase II trial is randomizing ≈156 pts with c-Met+/T790M– tumors who have failed first-line EFGR TKI 2:1 to tepotinib + gefitinib or pemetrexed + cisplatin/carboplatin. Clinical trial information: NCT02864992.

Silmitasertib (CX-4945) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin as first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: A phase Ib/II study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 312-312
Author(s):  
Mitesh J. Borad ◽  
Li-Yuan Bai ◽  
Ming-Huang Chen ◽  
Joleen M. Hubbard ◽  
Kabir Mody ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Almost All

312 Background: Silmitasertib (CX-4945), an oral small molecule inhibitor of casein kinase 2 (CK2), has exhibited preclinical antitumor activity and strong synergism with gemcitabine + cisplatin. We investigated the safety and efficacy of silmitasertib in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Methods: S4-13-001 is a multicenter, open-label, phase Ib/II study of silmitasertib in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic CCA. The phase Ib portion included dose-escalation, expansion, and exploratory cohorts of silmitasertib with doses ranging from 200 to 1000 mg bid (6 days for the escalation/expansion cohorts and 10 and 21 days’ continuous dosing for the exploratory cohorts). In the phase II portion patients received silmitasertib 1000 mg bid for 10 days in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin on days 1 & 8 over a 21-day cycle. In this interim analysis, we present findings from the combined population of patients from the phase Ib and II portions of the study. Response to treatment was assessed by RECIST v1.1 every 6 weeks. Primary efficacy outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS). ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02128282). Results: A total of 87 patients were enrolled and received silmitasertib in the phase Ib (n=50) and phase II (n=37) portions of the study. Of these, 55 patients were evaluable for efficacy with details as follows: median PFS 11.1 (95% CI 7.6–14.7) months; median overall survival (OS) 17.4 (95% CI 13.4–25.7) months; overall response rate (ORR) 32.1%; and disease control rate (DCR) 79.3%. Almost all patients (79/87; 90.8%) evaluable for safety reported ≥1 treatment-related adverse event (TEAE). The most common TEAEs (all grades) with silmitasertib were diarrhea (65.5%), nausea (50.6%), vomiting (33.3%), fatigue (31.0%), and anemia (21.8%). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were diarrhea (13.8%), neutropenia (11.5%), nausea (9.2%), anemia (8.0%), and thrombocytopenia (8.0%). Eleven patients (12.6%) discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. Conclusions: Silmitasertib in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin yields promising preliminary evidence of efficacy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic CCA. Based on these data a randomized phase III trial is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT02128282.

IMAGE, a randomized phase Ib/II study of elisidepsin (E) as a single agent in pretreated advanced gastroesophageal (GE) cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 92-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Salazar ◽  
Jean Philippe Metges ◽  
David Alan Anthoney ◽  
Gianluca Laus ◽  
Maria Alsina Maqueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Flat Dose

92 Background: E is a new marine compound with broad in vitro/in vivo antitumor activity. Low μM concentrations lead to cell-death through membrane permeabilization. E has shown evidence of activity in pre-treated GE patients (pts) in phase I trials. Methods: The primary objective was to determine the tolerability and efficacy of E in pts with GE cancer after 1-2 prior chemotherapy (CT) lines. Initially, dose was optimized (Phase Ib) in two different schedules: a fixed flat dose (FD) of intravenous (i.v) E (8 and 10 mg), in 24h, biweekly (Arm A) and i.v E (3.0 and 3.75mg), in 3h, weekly (Arm B). After dose optimization patients were included and stratified by histology to each optimal dose (Phase II) to determine the rate of progression-free survival at week 16 ± 1 (PFS4) in an intention to treat analysis. If at least two out of 15 pts reached PFS4, recruitment would continue to a maximum of 40 pts per arm. Results: A total of 45 pts were recruited, 12 pts into Phase Ib (Arm A/B: 6/6 pts) and 33 pts into Phase II (Arm A/B: 15/18 pts). Median age was 60 years (35–81 years), 39 were males and ECOG PS was 1 in 75% of pts. Tumour sites were gastric (32% pts), esophageal (39% pts) and esophago-gastric junction (30% pts). Ninety percent of pts had metastatic disease, 31.8% of which had liver metastasis; 55% of pts had two prior lines of CT . No DLTs occurred during the first cycle in the Phase Ib. The optimal dose for Arm A was 10 mg FD, 24h, biweekly; the optimal dose for Arm B was 3.75mg FD, 3h, weekly. Two patients reached PFS4 in Phase Ib (Arm A). Only one patient reached PFS4 in Phase II (Arm A). No objective responses were observed. Therefore, protocol criteria for further recruitment were not met. The safety profile showed grade 1-2 toxicity pruritus (29.5%), nausea (15.9%), vomiting (6.8%) and fatigue (25%). Grade 3-4 toxicity consisted of asymptomatic reversible liver enzyme increases in 20.5% of patients. Conclusions: E is a very tolerable drug with a unique mechanism of action. In the current setting of non-stratified advanced GE patients, E has insufficient antitumor activity to warrant further investigation. Clinical trial information: 2010-020325-40.

Local ablative therapy (LAT) for oligoprogressive, EGFR-mutant, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after treatment with osimertinib.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20545-e20545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chul Kim ◽  
Nitin Roper ◽  
Chuong D. Hoang ◽  
Eva Szabo ◽  
Maureen Connolly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
T790m Mutation ◽  
Tki Treatment ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Egfr Tkis

e20545 Background: EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, but disease progression limits efficacy. Retrospective studies show a survival benefit to LAT in patients with oligoprogressive disease (progression at a limited number of anatomic sites). Methods: This is a prospective study of LAT in patients with oligoprogressive EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Patients with no prior EGFR-TKI therapy (cohort 1) or progression after 1st/2ndgeneration EGFR-TKIs with acquired T790M mutation (cohort 2) receive osimertinib. Upon progression, eligible patients with < = 5 progressing sites undergo LAT and resume osimertinib until disease progression. Patients previously treated with osimertinib qualifying for LAT upon disease progression are also eligible for treatment (cohort 3). Primary endpoint: evaluation of safety and efficacy of reinitiation of osimertinib after LAT (assessed by PFS). Additional goals are assessment of mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib by multi-omics analyses of tumor, blood, and saliva. Results: Between 04/2016 and 01/2017, 15 patients were enrolled (cohort 1: 9, cohort 2: 3, cohort 3: 3). Median age was 57 (range 36-71). Treatment was well tolerated. The most common adverse events (AEs) were rash, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, and alanine transaminase elevation. Grade 3/4 AEs were observed in 4 (27%) patients. Among evaluable patients, objective response rates prior to LAT in cohorts 1 and 2 were 71% (5/7) and 100% (2/2), respectively, with 6.8 months median PFS (95% CI: 3.4 months-undefined) in cohort 1 and no progressions in cohort 2. To date, 5 patients (33%; cohort 1: 2; cohort 3: 3) had LAT. Two patients with 3 progressing sites underwent a combination of surgery and radiation. Three patients with 1 progressing site underwent surgery alone. Post-LAT PFS and results of molecular analyses will be presented. Conclusions: Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and oligoprogression after EGFR-TKI therapy can be safely treated with LAT. In selected patients, this approach could potentially maximize duration of EGFR-TKI treatment and prevent premature switching to other systemic therapies. Clinical trial information: NCT02759835.

TAKTIC: A prospective, multicenter, uncontrolled, phase IB/II study of LY2780301 (LY) in combination with weekly paclitaxel (wP) in HER2-negative locally advanced (LA) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1091-1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecile Vicier ◽  
Nicolas Isambert ◽  
Florence Dalenc ◽  
Mario Campone ◽  
Christelle Levy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Comparative Genomic ◽  
Dual Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Cytotoxic Treatment

1091 Background: Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-pathway is frequently activated in HER2-negative breast cancer and may play a role in taxane-resistance. LY is a dual inhibitor of p70 S6 kinase and AKT. TAKTIC study aimed to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of the combination of LY with wP (phase Ib) and to estimate overall response rate (ORR) of this regimen (phase II) in HER2-negative LA or MBC patients, both in the overall patient population and in patients with activation of PI3K/AKT pathway (PI3KAKT+). Methods: HER2-negative inoperable LA or MBC patients (pts), with (phase Ib) or without (phase II) previous cytotoxic treatment for advanced disease were eligible. Oral LY (400 or 500mg) was administered daily in combination with intravenous wP (70 or 80mg/m2). A modified CRM using an adaptive Bayesian model guided the dose escalation of both agents. PI3KAKT+ was defined as activating mutation of PIK3CA and/or AKT by targeted NGS or homozygous loss of PTEN by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) or loss of PTEN by immunohistochemistry, as evaluated on available fresh tumor tissue. Results: A total of 12 and 35 patients (pts) were included in the phase Ib and II, respectively. In phase Ib, only 1 dose-limiting toxicity (confusion) was observed at the last dose level (LY, 500 + wP, 80), which was determined as RP2D. Main drug-related adverse events (AE) in phase Ib were skin toxicity (92% of pts, G3-4 in 33%), and paresthesia (50% of pts, G3-4 in 8%). In the phase II study, ORR was 62.9 % [44.9,78.5] including 1 CR and 21 PR in the overall population and 55.6 % [30.8,78.5] in PI3KAKT+ pts (10 PR in 18 pts). Median progression-free survival was 12.4 months [7.9,17.9] and 6-month clinical benefit rate was 82.9% [66.4,93.4]. AEs in phase II were similar to phase I part, except that 17% of pts experienced pneumonia (G3-4 in 9%). Conclusions: Combining LY and wP in HER2-negative LA or MBC was feasible with preliminary evidences of efficacy, independently of PI3K/AKT activation. Clinical trial information: NCT01980277.

Nazartinib (EGF816) in patients with treatment-naïve EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Updated phase II results.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9574-9574
Author(s):  
Daniel Shao-Weng Tan ◽  
Natasha B. Leighl ◽  
James Chih-Hsin Yang ◽  
Gregory J. Riely ◽  
Lecia V. Sequist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maculopapular Rash ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Egfr Mutant

9574 Background: Prior data from a phase I/II study showed durable responses, including efficacy in brain lesions, and a tolerable safety profile with nazartinib in treatment (tx)-naïve patients (pts) with EGFR-mutant (mut), locally advanced (adv)/metastatic NSCLC. Here we report updated phase II results, including overall survival (OS). Methods: Tx-naïve adult pts with activating EGFR-mut (L858R or ex19del), stage IIIB/IV adv NSCLC with neurologically stable and controlled brain metastasis (BM) received oral nazartinib 150 mg once daily (continuous schedule). Primary endpoint: overall response rate (ORR) by BIRC per RECIST v1.1; secondary endpoints: disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), time to response, progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and safety. Results: At data cut-off (Nov 1, 2019), 45 pts were enrolled (median [range] age: 64 [28–83] years; 26 pts [58%] ECOG PS 1; 18 pts [40%] had baseline BM). EGFR mutations: 56% ex19del, 40% L858R, 4% other. 26/45 pts (58%) discontinued tx, with the primary reason being progressive disease in 19 pts (42%); 2 pts (4%) discontinued tx due to AEs. Median (range) follow-up for OS: 25 (0–33) months (mo); and for PFS: 17 (0–33) mo. ORR by BIRC: 69%; median PFS by BIRC: 18 mo; median OS was NE and at 33 mo, 56% of pts were alive (Table). BIRC results by baseline BM are shown in the Table. Median (range) duration of exposure: 24 (0–34) mo. Most frequent AEs (≥20% all grade, all causality): diarrhea (47%), maculopapular rash (38%), pyrexia (29%), cough and stomatitis (27% each), decreased appetite and pruritus (24% each), and dermatitis acneiform (22%). Most frequent grade 3/4 AEs (≥10%, all causality): maculopapular rash (5 pts [11%]; all grade 3) and increased lipase (5 pts [11%]; 1 pt with grade 4; no clinical pancreatitis AE was observed). Conclusions: After additional follow-up, median OS was still not reached and the safety profile was manageable. Nazartinib is a promising 3rd generation EGFR TKI for tx-naïve pts with adv EGFR-mut NSCLC, including pts with baseline BM. Clinical trial information: NCT02108964 . [Table: see text]

LENVAGIST - A multicenter, comparative, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, phase II study of the efficacy of lenvatinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic GIST after failure of imatinib and sunitinib.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11568-TPS11568
Author(s):  
Axel Le Cesne ◽  
Claire Cropet ◽  
Julien Gautier ◽  
Stéphanie Gagne ◽  
Katia Francourt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Multicenter Trial ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Double Blinded

TPS11568 Background: GastroIntestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) are paradigmatic models of cancers with a driver mutation of an oncogene, in which imatinib is recommended as adjuvant therapy or treatment of locally advanced and metastatic forms. After failure of imatinib (either progression or toxicity), sunitinib and regorafenib are indicated as 2nd and 3rd lines, respectively. Beyond approved drugs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) can bring clinical benefit because some clones remain sensitive to TKI. Lenvatinib is a broad spectrum TKI targeting KIT, RET, PDGFRA, VEGFR 1-3 and FGFR 1-4, that is approved in the treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of Lenvatinib in adult GIST patients (pts) who failed at least to previous imatinib and sunitinib. Seventy-four pts will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either oral lenvatinib, at a daily dose of 24mg, or its matching placebo, continuously, until progression of disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Randomization will be stratified according to the number of different previous anticancer drugs (2 or > 2). The primary objective is to compare the Progression-free survival (PFS) between arms. The expected median PFS are 1.5 month in the control arm and 3.0 months in the experimental arm (HR = 0.5). Seventy one events will provide 90% power to show significant improvement in PFS, using a 2-sided log-rank test at a 10% level. Secondary endpoints include the overall survival, the objective response rate, the best overall response, the quality of life and the safety profile. Patients allocated in the placebo arm who experience PD (RECIST 1.1) may switch to active lenvatinib. Radiological endpoints will be evaluated using the RECIST 1.1. Translational objectives will be to identify blood and tumor parameters as predictive markers of lenvatinib efficacy. Recruitment has been activated in January 2020. Ten participating sites of the French Sarcoma Group will participate in the trial. Clinical trial information: NCT04193553 .

Randomized phase II study of vandetanib (VAN) alone or in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7544-7544 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Heymach ◽  
L. Paz-Ares ◽  
F. De Braud ◽  
M. Sebastian ◽  
D. J. Stewart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Circulating Endothelial Cells ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Biomarker Analysis

7544 Background: VAN (ZD6474) is a once-daily oral agent that selectively inhibits VEGFR, EGFR and RET signaling. This randomized phase II trial investigated VAN alone or in combination with CP vs CP. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic (IIIB-IV) NSCLC. The primary objective was to determine whether VAN (300 mg/day) ± CP (C, target AUCss = 6 mg/ml·min; P; 200 mg/m2 iv) prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs CP (75% power to detect 30% prolongation; 1-sided P=0.2). An initial run-in phase had established VAN 300 mg/day as an appropriate dose to be given with CP. Results: A total of 181 pts (median age 61 yrs, range 27–83) received VAN (n=73), VAN + CP (n=56) or CP (n=52). The primary objective was met, with VAN + CP prolonging PFS vs CP (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.50–1.15; P=0.098): median PFS = 24 wks (VAN + CP) and 23 wks (CP). The VAN monotherapy arm was stopped early after a planned interim PFS analysis met the criterion for discontinuation (HR > 1.33 vs CP). The objective response rates were 32%, 25% and 7% for VAN + CP, CP and VAN, respectively. Overall survival (OS), a secondary endpoint, was not significantly different between pts receiving VAN + CP or CP (HR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.63–1.81; P=0.595). Exploratory subgroup analyses suggest advantages in PFS and OS for VAN + CP vs CP for the 56 female pts. There was a higher incidence of some adverse events with VAN + CP vs CP, including rash (64% vs 33%), diarrhea (53% vs 32%), asymptomatic QTc-related events (22% vs 4%) and hypertension (32% vs 4%). Pts receiving VAN + CP, including 7 who entered with CNS metastases and 11 with squamous histology, did not experience any intracranial bleeding, or hemoptysis of CTC grade 2 or higher. A biomarker analysis, including circulating endothelial cells and 35 plasma angiogenic factors and cytokines, suggests several potential markers predictive of clinical outcome and will be reported separately. Conclusions: In this randomized phase II trial of 1st-line advanced NSCLC, VAN + CP met the primary endpoint of prolonging PFS vs CP alone but did not provide a detectable survival advantage. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II study of suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) in subjects with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6045-6045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscila Hermont Goncalves ◽  
Shivaani Kummar ◽  
Lillian L. Siu ◽  
Aaron Richard Hansen ◽  
Panayiotis Savvides ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Genomic Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Epigenetic Mechanism ◽  
Correlative Studies

6045 Background: SAHA is a small molecule inhibitor of histone deacetylases (HDAC). Based on confirmed responses noted in 2 ACC patients treated with SAHA at our institution; we initiated this phase II trial. Methods: Patients with LA, recurrent or metastatic ACC and adequate organ function were eligible. Any prior number of chemotherapy regimens was allowed. Tumor tissue and blood were collected for correlative studies. SAHA was administered orally 400 mg daily for 28 days. The primary objective was to evaluate response rate (RR). Secondary endpoints included: time to tumor response (TTR); response duration (RD); progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS); and adverse events (AE). 29 evaluable patients were needed in a Simon 2-stage optimal design to distinguish RR of at most 5% vs. at least 20%, with alpha = 0.15 and power = 0.90. Results: 30 evaluable patients (overenrolled by 1) were accrued from at 5 different centers between August 2010 and June 2012. Median follow up among the censored patients is 3.8 months for PFS, and 7.2 months for OS. 19 patients were female, 24 were Caucasian, median age was 53 years (range 21-73); 21 patients had a performance status of 1; 20 patients were chemo-naïve. The median number of cycles completed was 5 (range 1-27+). Lymphopenia (n=5), hypertension (n=3), oral pain (n=2), thromboembolic events (n=2) and fatigue (n=2) were the only grade 3 AEs that occurred in more than 1 patient. 5 patients were dose reduced due to AEs. At the time of data cut-off, 9/30/2012, 1 patient with lung metastasis had a PR, with RD of 11.2+ months. TTR was 7.7 months. SD was the best response in 25 patients. Median PFS is 12.7 months (90% confidence interval lower limit: 3.7 months). Median OS has not been reached. There were 6 patients with PFS > 1 year. The correlative studies results will be presented. Conclusions: SAHA shows promise in the treatment of ACC. We are awaiting genomic analysis of the tumors to study the basis of clinical benefit (PR and SD) of SAHA in ACC. Future drug combination studies in ACC are being considered focusing on the epigenetic mechanism of SAHA. Supported by 5U01CA062487/19. Clinical trial information: NCT01175980.

A phase Ib study of abemaciclib in combination with pembrolizumab for patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (NCT02779751): Interim results.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1051-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hope S. Rugo ◽  
Peter Kabos ◽  
Joseph Thaddeus Beck ◽  
Michael Jon Chisamore ◽  
Anwar Hossain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Metastatic Setting

1051 Background: Abemaciclib is an orally administered, selective small molecule cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4 and 6 inhibitor, approved to treat HR+, HER2- MBC patients (pts) on a continuous twice daily dosing schedule as monotherapy or in combination with an aromatase inhibitor as initial endocrine based therapy or in combination with fulvestrant. Abemaciclib monotherapy increased tumor immunogenicity and synergized with anti-PD-1 to boost antitumor efficacy in murine models. Here we report safety and antitumor activity of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab in HR+, HER2- MBC pts. Methods: This multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label, multi-cohort phase Ib study of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab enrolled a cohort of endocrine resistant HR+, HER2- MBC pts who had received 1 or 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for MBC. No prior CDK4/6 inhibitor was allowed. Patients received 150mg abemaciclib orally every 12 hours plus pembrolizumab 200mg IV on day 1 every 21 days. Primary objective was to characterize safety of the abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab combination. Secondary objectives included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 28 pts enrolled, 15 (54%) received 1 line and 10 (36%) 2 lines of prior systemic chemotherapy in the locally advanced/metastatic setting. Safety of the combination was generally consistent with known side effects of abemaciclib and pembrolizumab and was generally manageable. Grade 3/4 adverse events in >2 pts included neutropenia (8 pts/29%), AST increase (5 pts/18%), diarrhea, and ALT increase (3 pts/11% each). Eight pts had confirmed partial response (29% ORR), and disease control rate (complete response [CR]+partial response [PR]+stable disease [SD]) was 82%. Clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD persisting for ≥6 months) was 46%. Median PFS and OS were 8.9 months (95% CI 3.9, 11.1) and 26.3 months (95% CI 20.0, 31.0), respectively. Conclusions: Combination of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated a generally tolerable safety profile with numerically higher rate of transaminase elevations than reported for the individual treatments. Compared to historical data for abemaciclib monotherapy in a similar pt population, a numerically higher but not obviously different ORR, PFS, and OS was observed. Clinical trial information: NCT02779751 .

scholarly journals Therapeutic effect of whole brain radiotherapy on advanced NSCLC between EGFR TKI-naïve and TKI-resistant

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lihao Zhao ◽  
Xiaona Cai ◽  
Didi Chen ◽  
Xuxue Ye ◽  
Mengdan Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Whole Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Whole Brain ◽  
Naive Group ◽  
Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Resistant Group ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Egfr Tki

Abstract Background The development of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has dramatically improved the prognosis of patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical outcome with or without EGFR-TKI resistance before WBRT and the sequence between EGFT-TKIs and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who developed multiple brain metastases (BMs). Patients and methods Three hundred forty-four EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with multiple BMs were reviewed. Enrolled patients were divided into TKI-naïve group and TKI-resistant group. The intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed via the Kaplan-Meier method. Results For patients with multiple BMs treated by WBRT, the median intracranial PFS and OS were longer in the TKI-naïve group than those in the TKI-resistant group, but there were no statistically significant between two groups (Intracranial PFS: 7.7 vs. 5.4 months, p = 0.052; OS: 11.2 vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.106). For patients with Lung-molGPA 0–2, no significant differences in median intracranial PFS (6.2 vs. 5.2 months, p = 0.123) and OS (7.8 vs. 6.7 months, p = 0.514) between TKI-naïve and TKI-resistant groups. For patients with Lung-molGPA 2.5–4, intracranial PFS: 12.8 vs. 10.1 months; OS: 23.3 vs. 15.3 months. Conclusions Our study found that there were no difference in intracranial PFS and OS in all patients between the two groups of TKI-naïve and TKI-resistant. But for patients in subgroup of Lung-molGPA 2.5–4, there were a better intracranial PFS and OS in TKI-naïve group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document