Prognosis of leptomeningeal metastases from melanoma: A case series of 28 patients.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13550-e13550
Author(s):  
Sarah Oinino ◽  
Isabelle Rodrigues ◽  
Thomas Boulanger ◽  
Charles Andre ◽  
Jacques Bonneterre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Melanoma Diagnosis ◽  
Systemic Treatments ◽  
First Line Treatment

e13550 Background: Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) are reported in 5-25% of patients with melanoma. However, only very few large contemporary cohorts of melanoma patients with LM have been published. Methods: We report on a case series of 28 consecutive patients with LM from melanoma (BRAF mutated in 14 cases, of 19 tested) diagnosed between April 2007 and April 2016, and treated for LM using a combination of systemic treatment, intra-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) therapy and radiotherapy according to prior treatments and the presentation of LM. Results: The median age at LM diagnosis was 49.5 years (range 27-73). Median ECOG-performance status was 2 (0-4). Concomitant brain metastases were present in all but 4 patients at LM diagnosis. LM was the first site of metastatic disease for only 2 patients. Median time from melanoma diagnosis to LM diagnosis was 0.33 years in patients with metastatic disease at melanoma diagnosis (4 patients) and 4.5 years in patients without metastatic disease at melanoma diagnosis (24 patients). First line treatment for LM was a combination of intra-CSF (liposomal cytarabine) and systemic treatments in 25 cases, and systemic treatment alone in 3 cases. Systemic treatments include chemotherapy (n = 18), targeted therapy (BRAF inhibitor n = 9; MEK inhibitor, n = 3) and immunotherapy (n = 4). No radiotherapy was performed. Ten patients received more than one line of treatment for LM. Median progression-free survival with first line treatment was 1.75 months. Responses or stabilization (for at least 2 months) were observed in only 7 patients. Median overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort was 3.08 months. Conclusions: The prognosis of patients with LM from melanoma remains poor. The role of new agents such as targeted therapies and immunotherapy for the treatment of LM is still not well defined. Adequate use of intrathecal chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy could improve the survival of these patients.

scholarly journals Pembrolizumab as first line treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma patients – a case series of patients with various co-morbidities

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 793-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessa Bystrup Boyles ◽  
Mette Schødt ◽  
Helle Westergren Hendel ◽  
Anders Krarup-Hansen ◽  
Niels Junker
Keyword(s):  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Merkel Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Merkel Cell ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Economic burden of adverse events in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16573-e16573
Author(s):  
May Hagiwara ◽  
Rohit Borker ◽  
Gerry Oster
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
First Line Treatment

e16573 Background: To estimate costs associated with adverse events (AEs) in patients receiving targeted therapies indicated for first-line treatment of mRCC. Methods: A retrospective study using a large US healthcare claims database (PharMetrics) from 1/2000 to 12/2009 was conducted. Study subjects were aged ≥18 years, had mRCC, and received first-line treatment with targeted therapies. AEs of interest comprised abdominal pain, back pain, diarrhea, dyspnea, extremity pain, fatigue/asthenia, hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, lymphopenia, nausea/vomiting, neutropenia, and proteinuria. Patients receiving care for these AEs were identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis/procedure codes on healthcare claims. Costs were examined over a 30-day period, beginning with date of first mention of each AE; non-evented patients were assigned a “shadow” index date for comparison purposes. We estimated total costs over 30 days following the index date for patients with and without AEs, on both unadjusted basis and following adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics using a generalized linear model (GLM). Direct costs of targeted therapy were not considered. Results: Among patients receiving targeted therapy for mRCC, 64% had healthcare encounters for one or more AEs. AEs occurring with frequency >20% included severe abdominal pain, back pain, fatigue/asthenia, and nausea/vomiting, respectively; 10-20% of patients had encounters for diarrhea, dyspnea, and extremity pain, respectively. Mean [SD] total costs of care during the 30-day, post-index period were substantially higher among patients with AEs ($12,177 [$19,621] vs $4070 [$8142] for those without AEs). Adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, the estimated cost difference (95% CI) was $11,373 ($5286 - $21,419). Conclusions: Costs associated with AEs of first-line targeted therapies are substantial in patients with mRCC. Efforts to prevent and/or better manage these events may reduce healthcare costs.

Predictors of disease control in patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapies for metastatic squamous-cell esophageal cancer: First results of the e-DIS trial.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 95-95
Author(s):  
Antoine Adenis ◽  
Jaafar Bennouna ◽  
Marie-Pierre Galais ◽  
Emmanuelle Tresch ◽  
Eric Francois ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Disease Assessment ◽  
Concomitant Disease ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
First Line Treatment

95 Background: There is little evidence that chemotherapy (CT) impacts on outcome of patients with MSEC. We designed an ongoing randomized phase 2 trial to detect a progression-free survival benefit of CT continuation over CT discontinuation in disease-controlled and ECOG≤2 patients at 6 weeks after an initial CT treatment. The aim of the present study was to identify predictors of disease control at 6 weeks (DC6wkx) in MSEC patients receiving platinum-based CTs as first-line treatment for metastatic disease. Methods: Among 68/70 evaluable patients included between 1/2011 and 7/2013 who received at least 1 CT cycle, 58 were evaluable for disease assessment at 6 weeks. Ten patients were not evaluable (early death: 4, patient’s decision: 2, concomitant disease 1, early progressive disease 1, other reasons: 2). Baseline demographic, clinical, biological, and tumor characteristics were tested for prediction of DC6wkx. Significant variables for DC6wkx were identified with the chi-squared test and logistic regression. Results: Baseline patients characteristics were as follows: median age: 61.5yo; male: 57/68; ECOG 0/1/2: 13/42/13; metachronous/synchronous MSEC: 38/30; number of metastatic sites 1/2/>2: 35/20/13; metastatic location: lung 36, liver 23, bone 11, nodes 37, other 11; prior exposure to CT: 37/68; time from previous CT exposure: ≤ 6m 6/37, 6-12m 14/37, > 12m 17/37; gr>2 dysphagia (Atkinson) 19/67; BMI<18.5kg/m²: 13/68. Current CTs were FU-CDDPq3w 2/68, LV5FU2-CDDPq2w 15/68, FOLFOX 51/68, and patients received the following number of cycles 1/2/>2: 5/7/54. DC6wkx rate was 65.7%, with 16/68 PR (23.5%) and 28/68 SD (42.2%). Albumin (p<0.01), BMI (p<0.02), bone metastases (p<0.005), gender (p<0.047) and ECOG status (p<0.05) were predictive of DC6wkx. Normal or overweight BMI, grade 0 albumin, and no bone metastases, were predictive of DC6wkx in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: DC at 6 wks was 65.7% in MSEC receiving platinum-based CTs as first line treatment for metastatic disease. Normal or overweight BMI, normal albumin, and the absence of bone metastasis were significant predictors of DC6wkx in this prospective phase 2 trial. Clinical trial information: NCT01248299.

Predictors of first line systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in IMDC favorable risk patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17086-e17086
Author(s):  
Ryuichi Mizuno ◽  
Kimiharu Takamatsu ◽  
Nobuyuki Tanaka ◽  
Nozomi Hayakawa ◽  
Takeo Kosaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Baseline Serum ◽  
Female Age ◽  
Serum Crp ◽  
First Line Treatment

e17086 Background: With the induction of molecular targeted agents, which interfere with proteins that play critical roles in tumor growth and progression, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), the scenario of systemic treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have dramatically been changed with improved survival. Prognostic risk assessment is essential for choosing the most appropriate first line treatment option, with selection based on International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) Risk Category. This study was designed to evaluate the actual efficacy of systemic therapy in the IMDC favorable risk group patients with mRCC. Methods: A total of 218 patients with mRCC who received systemic therapy were retrospectively reviewed (Institutional review board approval No 2013-0425). Among them, 55 (25%) patients were classified as favorable risk group based on the IMDC Risk Category. These mRCC patients in the favorable risk were divided into 2 groups by following factors; gender (male or female), age (≥70, or not), baseline serum CRP levels (≥0.6, and < 0.6 mg/dl), metastatic sites (exclusive lung, or lung and others), BMI (≥22, or < 22), respectively. The overall survival (OS) of patients in the favorable risk group were compared between the two cohorts. Results: The median PFS for first line treatment and OS of patients in favorable risk group were 31.6 (95% CI 19.9–33.7)) and 85.8 (56.8-NE) months, respectively. The median OS in patients with BMI≥22 and < 22 was 65.6 (95% CI 56.8–NE) and 56.8 (95% CI 30.8–NE) months, respectively (p = 0.0497). The median OS in patients with exclusive lung metastasis, and lung and other metastases were 115.1 (95% CI NE) and 65.6 (95% CI 43.9–NE) months, respectively (p = 0.0073). No significant difference was found in OS between male and female, age≥70 and < 70, and baseline serum CRP levels ≥0.6 mg/dl and < 0.6, respectively. Conclusions: The first line systemic treatment for mRCC patients in IMDC favorable risk group was feasible and effective in patients with BMI≥22 or exclusive lung metastasis.

A nationwide population-based study comparing survival in unresectable advanced or synchronous metastatic esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 308-308
Author(s):  
Marieke Pape ◽  
Pauline A.J. Vissers ◽  
David Bertwistle ◽  
Laura McDonald ◽  
Hanneke W.M. Van Laarhoven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Tumor Characteristics ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Netherlands Cancer Registry ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Line Treatment

308 Background: Similarities between esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas have been identified in terms of genomic characteristics. There is however no consensus on the combined or stratified inclusion of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) within gastric cancer (GC) clinical trials. The aim of our study was to compare patient and tumor characteristics, first-line treatment regimens and overall survival (OS) of patients with EAC and GC. Methods: We selected patients with unresectable advanced and/or synchronous metastatic EAC (n = 1554) or GC (including junction tumors; n = 2095) diagnosed in the period 2015-2017 from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients with a positive HER2 test result and/or receiving trastuzumab as a first-line treatment were excluded. Data on OS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves with Log-Rank test. Results: The EAC patient population had significantly more male patients (83% vs 66%), lower median age (68 vs 71 years) and higher median BMI (25.4 vs 24.5). Significant differences in location of metastases were identified, with higher percentages in non-regional lymph nodes (48% vs 28%), liver (50% vs 35%), lung (21% vs 9%) and bone (19% vs 7%) and lower in peritoneum (5% vs 42%), in EAC versus GC patients respectively. EAC patients more often received any type (supportive or active systemic) of treatment (76% vs 60%). Median OS was longer in EAC than GC patients (EAC: 4.8 vs GC: 4.1 months; p < 0.01). The percentages of patients receiving first-line systemic treatment were equal in both groups (43%). The number of patients receiving CapOx or FOLFOX was not significantly different (43% vs 47%). Carboplatin+paclitaxel was more frequently given in EAC versus GC (34% vs 3%), while EOX or ECC was given less frequently (12% vs 30%). No significant difference was observed in median OS between EAC and GC patients receiving first-line active systemic treatment (8.0 vs 7.6 months; p = 0.28). Conclusions: Patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, treatment regimens and OS differ between EAC and GC patients. Despite these differences, in patients receiving first-line active systemic treatment no significant differences in OS were found.

Somatic Treatment of Catatonia

1995 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 345-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Hawkins ◽  
Katharine J. Archer ◽  
Stephen M. Strakowski ◽  
Paul E. Keck
Keyword(s):  
Case Reports ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Positive Outcome ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Frequency Of Use ◽  
Specific Symptoms ◽  
First Line Treatment ◽  
Malignant Catatonia

Objective: The authors reviewed the recent literature regarding the treatment of catatonia as a syndrome of multiple etiologies. Given the historical and clinical association of catatonia with schizophrenia, the authors' examined the assumption that the first-line treatment of catatonia is antipsychotic medication. Methods: Articles published between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 1994 were located using the Paperchase® medical literature search system. Additionally, references from those identified articles were examined for possible inclusion in this review. To be included in this review, articles had to be written in English and report specific symptoms of catatonia to determine, retrospectively, if DSM-IV criteria for catatonia were met. Results: Seventy publications met inclusion criteria and reported on a total of 178 patients and included 270 separate treatment episodes. Most of the articles were case-reports, although a few case-series were identified. Multiple causes of catatonia were identified in these reports. The most commonly reported treatment for catatonia was with benzodiazepines which were effective in 70 percent of the cases, with lorazepam demonstrating the highest frequency of use and a 79 percent complete response rate. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) was also efficacious (85%) and was more likely to provide a positive outcome in cases of malignant catatonia. Antipsychotics demonstrated poor efficacy. Conclusions: Catatonia is a nonspecific syndrome with multiple etiologies. Treatment of catatonia should be based on the underlying cause when it is identifiable. Lorazepam appears to offer a safe, effective first-line treatment of catatonia. ECT should be considered when rapid resolution is necessary (e.g., malignant catatonia) or when an initial lorazepam trial fails.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document