Evaluation of cardiovascular status in clinical trials in breast cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14038-e14038
Author(s):  
Ohad Oren ◽  
Michal Oren
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
P Value ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Cardiac Status

e14038 Background: With the expansion of treatment options in oncology, patients are now increasingly exposed to potentially cardio-injurious compounds. Nevertheless, many clinical trials do not assess the cardiac status of participants, from time of enrollment to study completion. Methods: We reviewed the landmark clinical trials of each of the single-agent chemotherapies specified by the NCCN for use in locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer. We analysed the cardiovascular exclusion criteria, baseline cardiac evaluation as well as cardiac surveillance of patients in each study. We then investigated the literature in the years following each index publication, scrutinising for evidence of cardiac toxicity. Results: 14 phase 2/3 studies were analysed. The total number of patients was 2,522. 42.8% (6/14) of the studies excluded patients with clinically-determined cardiovascular disease, 66.6% (4) of which specified normal EF as a pre-requisite for enrollment. 42.8% (6/14) of the studies evaluated the baseline cardiovascular function of participants using EKG or TTE. 35.7% (4/14) of the studies included a more rigorous monitoring that included serial EKGs and/or TTEs. New Heart Failure (HF) occurred in 1.63% (20/1226) and 0.87% (9/1024) of patients in the more- and less- rigorous trials, respectively (P value = 0.11). Subsequent follow-up studies (published a mean of 8.5 years later) disclosed significantly higher incidence of symptomatic HF (range 2.3-28.0%) with 3 (of 4) chemotherapies in the more-rigorous study group (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, epirubicin) and 1 (of 10) chemotherapies in the less-rigorous group (docetaxel). Conclusions: The majority of clinical studies in breast cancer do not prospectively assess cardiac status beyond a pure clinical assessment. The discrepancy between the toxicity profile shown by original studies and that detected in subsequent investigations implies that the tools currently used to evaluate the cardiovascular status of enrollees may be insufficiently sensitive in predicting the development of HF. Novel tools (circulating markers, imaging) and longer follow-up periods are needed to ascertain the cardiotoxic profile of new chemotherapies.

Ixabepilone Plus Capecitabine for Metastatic Breast Cancer Progressing After Anthracycline and Taxane Treatment

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (33) ◽  
pp. 5210-5217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva S. Thomas ◽  
Henry L. Gomez ◽  
Rubi K. Li ◽  
Hyun-Cheol Chung ◽  
Luis E. Fein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival

PurposeEffective treatment options for patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes are limited. Ixabepilone has single-agent activity in these patients and has demonstrated synergy with capecitabine in this setting. This study was designed to compare ixabepilone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in anthracycline-pretreated or -resistant and taxane-resistant locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.Patients and MethodsSeven hundred fifty-two patients were randomly assigned to ixabepilone 40 mg/m2intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2orally on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle, or capecitabine alone 2,500 mg/m2on the same schedule, in this international phase III study. The primary end point was progression-free survival evaluated by blinded independent review.ResultsIxabepilone plus capecitabine prolonged progression-free survival relative to capecitabine (median, 5.8 v 4.2 months), with a 25% reduction in the estimated risk of disease progression (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.88; P = .0003). Objective response rate was also increased (35% v 14%; P < .0001). Grade 3/4 treatment-related sensory neuropathy (21% v 0%), fatigue (9% v 3%), and neutropenia (68% v 11%) were more frequent with combination therapy, as was the rate of death as a result of toxicity (3% v 1%, with patients with liver dysfunction [≥ grade 2 liver function tests] at greater risk). Capecitabine-related toxicities were similar for both treatment groups.ConclusionIxabepilone plus capecitabine demonstrates superior efficacy to capecitabine alone in patients with metastatic breast cancer pretreated or resistant to anthracyclines and resistant to taxanes.

scholarly journals How shall we treat locally advanced triple negative breast cancer?

F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 1649
Author(s):  
Paulo Luz ◽  
David Dias ◽  
Ana Fortuna ◽  
Luis Bretes ◽  
Beatriz Gosalbez
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Near Future

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been shown to respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). It has been established that achieving pathological complete response (pCR) for certain aggressive subtypes of breast cancer, including HER-2 (over-expressed) and TNBC, provides an important surrogate marker for predicting long-term clinical response and survival outcomes. How to increase the number of patients that achieve pCR remains challenging. Platinum-based NACT seems to be part of the solution and capecitabine, an active drug in metastatic breast cancer, but not a standard one in earlier stages may have found its place in the adjuvant setting. In the near future immunotherapy can play a role in early TNBC

Triple Negative Breast Cancer Pathologic Diagnosis and Current Chemotherapy Treatment Options

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Bernardo L Rapoport ◽  
Simon Nayler ◽  
Georgia S Demetriou ◽  
Shun D Moodley ◽  
Carol A Benn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Pathologic Diagnosis ◽  
Metastatic Setting

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) comprises 12–20 % of all breast cancers and are a heterogeneous group of tumors, both clinically and pathologically. These cancers are characterized by the lack of expression of the hormone receptors estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), combined with the lack of either overexpression or amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER2)gene. Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and DNA damaging agents continue to be the mainstay of treatment of this disease in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic setting. The lack of predictive markers in identifying potential targets for the treatment of TNBC has left a gap in directed therapy in these patients. Platinum agents have seen renewed interest in TNBC based on an increasing body of preclinical and clinical data suggesting encouraging activity. However, comparisons between chemotherapy regimens are mostly retrospective in nature and the best agents or drug combinations for TNBC have not been established in prospective randomized trials. Numerous studies have now shown that TNBC has significantly higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rates compared with hormone receptor positive breast cancer when treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and pCR correlates well with better outcomes for these patients. Patients with TNBC account for a larger number of deaths in the setting of metastatic breast cancer. There is no preferred treatment for the first-line metastatic setting. Although individual agents are recommended, given the often aggressive nature of TNBC and the presence of extensive visceral disease, the use of a combination of drugs, rather than a single agent, is often advocated. This review article will outline the pathologic diagnosis of TNBC and the treatment options available to these patients in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic setting, including an assessment of future directions of treatment.

Gemcitabine plus docetaxel versus docetaxel in patients (pts) with HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC): A randomized phase III study

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1015-1015
Author(s):  
D. L. Nielsen ◽  
S. T. Langkjer ◽  
K. Bjerre ◽  
S. Cold ◽  
L. Stenbygaard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Grade 3

1015 Background: Gemcitabine (G), either as a single agent or in combination with taxanes, has demonstrated efficacy in MBC in phase II and III studies. We conducted a phase III study to compare time to progression (TTP) of G plus docetaxel (T) versus (vs.) T alone. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity. Methods: Females with HER-2-negative locally advanced or MBC and a WHO performance status ≤ 2 were randomized to GT (G 1,000mg/m2 day 1 + 8; T 75mg/m2 day 1) or T (100mg/m2 day 1) every 21 days. Pts were previously untreated, had prior anthracycline-based (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy or had received a single prior anthracycline-bsed chemotherapy regimen for MBC. Time-to-event endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was applied for comparisons between regimens. The planned sample size was 254 evaluable pts with α I and β of 0.05 and 0.90, respectively. Results: A total of 336 pts were randomized (170 GT; 166 T), data from one centre are yet missing and the present evaluation is based on data from 306 pts (155 GT; 151 T). The pts had a median age of 58 years in both regimens; range 36–73 years and 30–74 years, respectively. The median TTP was 7.5 months for the GT regimen vs. 6.5 months for the T regimen. The GT arm demonstrated an ORR of 44% vs. 38% in the T arm with 4 and 3 % complete responses, respectively. The OS was 13.4 vs. 13.2 months in the GT and T arm, respectively. Hematologic toxicity was common, especially grade 3–4 neutropenia (GT = 69%; T = 61%); infection was reported in 22 and 20% of the pts, respectively (none of the pts received G-CSF). The most commonly reported non-hematologic toxicities of grade 3–4 included mucositis (GT = 2%; T = 5%), diarrhea (GT = 4%; T = 7 %), fatigue (GT = 6%; T = 11%), oedema (GT = 10%; T = 3%), and peripheral neuropathy (GT = 9%; T = 28%). Conclusions: Preliminary data of GT as first- or second-line chemotherapy demonstrates a TTP advantage among HER-2-negative pts with advanced breast cancer. Updated results and proper statistical analyses will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Real-word incidence and management of durable complete response in de novo metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13017-e13017
Author(s):  
Claire Elizabeth Powers Smith ◽  
Paul Kelly Marcom ◽  
Zahi Ibrahim Mitri
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Number Of Patients

e13017 Background: HER2-directed therapies enable a small number of patients with de novo HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to achieve long term durable responses (DR). However, clinic-pathologic factors that correlate with DRs in de novo HER2+ MBC are unknown. Expert opinion dictates indefinite HER2-directed therapies for patients who achieve DRs, but real-world examples of this practice, especially the effect on cardiotoxicity, are lacking in the literature. Methods: This is a retrospective case control study of patients with de novo HER2+ MBC who received treatment with trastuzumab at two NCI designated cancer centers between the years 2012-2017. Patients were included if ≥2 years of follow up data were available or if patients were deceased. DRs are defined as radiographic complete or partial response without progression or death at any point after diagnosis. Controls are patients with evidence of radiographic progression or death any point after diagnosis. Age at diagnosis, ER/PR status, site of metastasis, and initial treatment were analyzed. An un-paired T test for age and fisher exact test for categorical variables were used. Results: A total of 96 patients with de novo HER2+ MBC, 28 with DRs and 68 with progression, were identified. Average follow up length for patients with DR was 90 months (range 27-224 months). Patients who progressed had a mPFS of 17.5 months and a mOS of 60 months. Results are shown in Table. Additionally, six patients (6.3%) developed reduced ejection fraction, one with DR, five with progression. Nine patients have been receiving trastuzumab for over ten years with no evidence of disease. Only one patient opted to discontinue this therapy a year after complete response and is disease free five years from diagnosis. Conclusions: Nearly a third of patients with de novo metastatic HER2+ MBC in our dataset achieved DR. Factors that predict DRs include single organ involved by metastatic disease and more intensive upfront chemotherapy including trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The majority of patients with DR continued HER2 directed therapy indefinitely with minimal cardiotoxicity. In the absence of predictive biomarkers of DRs, indefinite trastuzumab administration is common practice for these patients. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Taxanes Alone or in Combination With Anthracyclines As First-Line Therapy of Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 1980-1986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martine J. Piccart-Gebhart ◽  
Tomasz Burzykowski ◽  
Marc Buyse ◽  
George Sledge ◽  
James Carmichael ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Hazard Ratios

Purpose Taxanes (paclitaxel or docetaxel) have been sequenced or combined with anthracyclines (doxorubicin or epirubicin) for the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. This meta-analysis uses data from all relevant trials to detect any advantages of taxanes in terms of tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and survival. Patients and Methods Individual patient data were collected on eight randomized combination trials comparing anthracyclines + taxanes (+ cyclophosphamide in one trial) with anthracyclines + cyclophosphamide (+ fluorouracil in four trials), and on three single-agent trials comparing taxanes with anthracyclines. Combination trials included 3,034 patients; single-agent trials included 919 patients. Results Median follow-up of living patients was 43 months, median survival was 19.3 months, and median PFS was 7.1 months. In single-agent trials, response rates were similar in the taxanes (38%) and in the anthracyclines (33%) arms (P = .08). The hazard ratios for taxanes compared with anthracyclines were 1.19 (95% CI, 1.04 to 1.36; P = .011) for PFS and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.16; P = .90) for survival. In combination trials, response rates were 57% (10% complete) in taxane-based combinations and 46% (6% complete) in control arms (P < .001). The hazard ratios for taxane-based combinations compared with control arms were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85 to 0.99; P = .031) for PFS and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.03; P = .24) for survival. Conclusion Taxanes were significantly worse than single-agent anthracyclines in terms of PFS, but not in terms of response rates or survival. Taxane-based combinations were significantly better than anthracycline-based combinations in terms of response rates and PFS, but not in terms of survival.

scholarly journals Prophylactic Effect of Memantine in Docetaxel Induced Neuropathy in Patients With Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pegah Mohammadzadeh ◽  
Elnaz Shaseb ◽  
Zohreh Sanaat ◽  
Parvin Sarbakhsh ◽  
Nasrin Gholami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Control

Abstract Purpose Peripheral neuropathy is a complication of taxane that in severe cases can limit the optimal treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of memantine in prevention of docetaxel induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with breast cancer. Methods In this randomized clinical trial, 40 women between the ages of 18 and 64 years with non-metastatic breast cancer (stages I to III) were included (registry number: IRCT20160310026998N9 and registry date: 26 March 2019). All patients were treated with the AC-T regimen (with docetaxel). Patients in intervention group received memantine at a dose of 20 mg for 8 weeks at the beginning of the first cycle of docetaxel. Patients in control group did not take any medication for neuropathy prevention. To assess the neuropathy, DN4 and CTCAE questionnaires were used at baseline, one months, three months and six months after the intervention. Results The DN4 questionnaire score was remarkably less in memantine group in follow up one (p-value: 0.033) and three (p < 00.1). The CTCAE follow up score did not change during study. The Neuropathy duration and Neuropathy onset, were shown significant difference between the intervention and control groups, p = 0.050 and p = 0.001, respectively. From 40 patients, 8 (40%) in memantine group and 2 (10%) in control group, did not experience any kind of neuropathy. Conclusion Data showed that prophylactic administration of memantine 20 mg/day has been effective in prevention of severity and incidence of docetaxel induced neuropathy in patients with breast cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document