Primary care vs. oncology-driven surveillance following adjuvant chemotherapy in resected pancreas cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18163-e18163
Author(s):  
Haider Samawi ◽  
Yaling Yin ◽  
Howard John Lim ◽  
Daniel John Renouf ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Pancreas Cancer ◽  
Surveillance Strategy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Assessments ◽  
Imaging Results ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
To Receive

e18163 Background: No standard surveillance strategy exists following resection of pancreas cancer. Our aims were to describe patterns of surveillance and to evaluate their impact on outcomes. Methods: Patients who received at least one cycle of adjuvant gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil monotherapy at any 1 of 5 cancer centers in British Columbia from 2004 to 2015 were included. Surveillance was divided into two groups: discharged to primary care physicians (PCP) or follow up with oncologists (ONC) that included regular clinical assessments, laboratory testing and/or imaging. Results: We identified 147 patients. Median age at diagnosis was 64 (range 38-85) years and 48% were men. More patients were followed by ONC than PCP (66% vs. 44%). ONC were more likely to follow patients with T3/4 (78% vs. 62%, P = 0.03), while all other prognostic factors were balanced between the two groups. At the time of analysis, 68% of patients had a documented recurrence and 59% died. The median overall survival (OS) was 2.82 (95% CI 2.17-3.32) years in the ONC group and 3.35 (95% CI 2.85-5.06) years in the PCP group while the median relapse free survival (RFS) was 1.4 (95% CI 1.37-1.77) and 2.4 (95% CI 2.07-4.59) years, respectively. On multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in OS between ONC and PCP-driven surveillance (HR 1.23; 95% CI 0.74-2.04, P = 0.4); however, RFS favored the PCP group (HR 1.62; 95% CI 1.01-2.56, P = 0.04, for oncology). On recurrence, 51% of patients received chemotherapy where the most common first line regimens were FOLFIRINOX (21%) and Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel (20%). Patients followed by ONC were more likely to receive chemotherapy on recurrence than those followed by PCP (58% vs. 34%, respectively, P = 0.03), however, there was no difference in survival after recurrence between PCP & ONC (recurrence to death, 5.7 vs 8.9 months, respectively (P = 0.21). Conclusions: Surveillance tests and imaging performed by ONC detected recurrences earlier and correlated with a higher likelihood of aggressive therapy when compared to follow up by PCPs, but this did not result in OS differences. PCPs may have a larger role in the follow up care of selected patients with resected pancreas cancer.

Primary care vs. oncology-driven surveillance following adjuvant chemotherapy in resected pancreas cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 421-421
Author(s):  
Haider H Samawi ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Pancreas Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Tumor Stage ◽  
Advanced Tumor ◽  
Imaging Results ◽  
Significant Difference

421 Background: Major oncology societies outline different recommendations following curative intent treatment for pancreas cancer and this has resulted in wide variations in practice among institutions. We aim to describe patterns of surveillance and evaluate their impact on outcomes. Methods: A total of 147 adult patients who received at least one cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil monotherapy at any of the British Columbia Cancer Agency centers between 2004 and 2015 were included in this analysis. Surveillance strategies were divided into two groups: discharged to primary care physicians (PCP) or follow up with oncologists that included regular clinical assessments, laboratory testing and/or diagnostic imaging. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 64 (range 38-85) years and 48% were men. More patients were followed by oncologists than PCP (66% vs. 44%). Among the measured prognostic factors, only patients with advanced tumor stage (T3/4) were more likely to be followed by cancer specialists (78% vs. 62%, P = 0.03), while age, gender, performance status, node status, pathologic grade and surgical margins were balanced between the two groups. In the entire cohort, 100 (68%) patients had a documented recurrence. Patient followed by oncologists were more likely to receive chemotherapy on recurrence than those followed by PCP (58% vs. 34%, respectively, P = 0.03). The median overall survival (OS) was 2.82 (95% CI 2.17-3.32) years in the oncology group and 3.35 (95% CI 2.85-5.06) years in the PCP group while the median relapse free survival (RFS) was 2.4 (95% CI 2.07-4.59) and 1.4 (95%CI 1.37-1.77) years, respectively. On multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in OS between oncology and PCP-driven surveillance (HR 1.23; 95% CI 0.74-2.04, P = 0.4); however, RFS favored the PCP group (HR 1.62; 95% CI 1.01-2.56, P = 0.04, for oncology). Conclusions: In this population-based analysis, surveillance tests and imaging performed by oncologists detected recurrences earlier when compared to follow up by PCPs, but this did not result in OS differences. PCPs may have a larger role in the follow up care of selected patients with resected pancreas cancer.

Follow-up Analysis of a Randomized Comparison of Prolonged Myelosuppressive Maintenance Therapy Versus Intensive Consolidation Therapy as Postremission Therapy in AML.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1056-1056
Author(s):  
Utz O. Krug ◽  
Maria Cristina Sauerland ◽  
Bernhard J Woermann ◽  
Wolfgang Berdel ◽  
Wolfgang Hiddemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Postremission Therapy ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Abstract 1056 Poster Board I-78 Introduction: We previously showed that a prolonged myelosuppressive maintenance chemotherapy was superior to S-HAM as a postremission therapy in patients > 16 years of age with AML after a TAD-HAM double induction therapy and TAD consolidation chemotherapy with regard to relapse-free survival (RFS) and borderline significance of the overall survival (OS) in responding patients (Buchner et al., JCO 2003, 21:4496-4504). Here we present long-term follow-up data with a median follow-up of 7.9 years from diagnosis and 7.1 years from the date of complete remission. Patients and Methods: Eight hundred thirty-two patients (median age, 54 years; range, 16 to 82 years) with de novo AML were upfront randomized in the AMLCG1992 study of the German AML Co-operative Group to receive 6-thioguanine, cytarabine, and daunorubicin (TAD) plus cytarabine and mitoxantrone (HAM; cytarabine 3 g/m2 [age < 60 years] or 1 g/m2 [age ≥ 60 years] x 6 (HAM in patients ≥ 60 years only in case of blast persistence on day 16 of therapy) induction, TAD consolidation, and monthly maintenance with cycles of cytarabine combined with either daunorubicin (course 1), 6-thioguanine (course 2), cyclophosphamide (course 3), and again 6-thioguanine (course 4), and restarting with course 1 for 3 years, or to receive TAD-HAM-TAD and one course of intensive consolidation with sequential HAM (S-HAM) with cytarabine 1 g/m2 (age < 60 years) or 0.5 g/m2 (age ≥ 60 years) x 8 instead of maintenance. Results: A total of 576 patients (69.2%) achieved a complete remission (CR) those were 294 of 429 (68.5%) patients randomized to receive maintenance and 282 of 403 (70.0%) patients randomized to receive intensive consolidation S-HAM (p=n.s.). 190 patients received maintenance therapy as intended and 135 patients received an intensive consolidation therapy as intended. This prolonged follow-up analysis verified the superior relapse-free survival in all patients in the maintenance arm (10-year RFS 30.0 ± 5.6 versus 19.9 ± 6.1 %, p = 0.015). Stratified by age, the 10-year RFS was superior in younger patients < 60 years (36.9 ± 7.1 versus 25.2 ± 8.0 %, p = 0.038) and borderline significant in elderly patients (17.2 ± 4.5 versus 6.8 ± 6.2 %, p = 0.075). A subgroup analysis of known risk groups (lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level < 700U/l versus ≥ 700U/l at diagnosis, cytogenetic risk profile, bone marrow blasts on day 16 after the start of the induction therapy) revealed a superior RFS in the subgroup of patients with LDH level > 700 U/l at diagnosis (33.5 ± 12.3 versus 18.2 ± 9.5 %, p = 0.043). This superior RFS also translated into a superior 10-year relapse-free interval (RFI) of all responding patients in the maintenance arm (35.7 ± 6.3 versus 27.6 ± 5.9 %, p = 0.015) with borderline significance in younger patients (42.9 ± 7.4 versus 35.0 ± 7.4 %, p = 0.053) and a significant difference in elderly patients (20.6 ± 10.0 versus 8.4 ± 7.5 %, p = 0.043). In this updated analysis, there was a trend, but no significant difference in the OS (maintenance arm: 10-year OS 24.3 ± 4.8, intensive consolidation arm: 19.7 ± 4.7 %, p = 0.148), and we verified a trend for a better OS in responding patients for the maintenance arm (10-year OS in responding patients 33.6 ± 7.5 versus 28.5 ± 6.2 %, p = 0.093). The event-free survival (EFS) also showed a trend towards better EFS in the maintenance arm (10-year EFS 20.7 ± 4.2 versus 14.8 ± 4.1 %, p = 0.082) which was significant in elderly patients (10-year EFS 10.5 ± 5.5 versus 3.9 ± 3.7 %, p = 0.044). Discussion: This updated analysis with a long-term follow-up of median 7.9 years from diagnosis and 7.1 years from CR verified the superior RFS and the trend for enhanced OS in responding patients. These results suggest the superiority of a prolonged monthly myelosuppressive maintenance therapy as compared to intensive consolidation S-HAM after TAD-HAM induction and TAD consolidation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Updated analysis of NCIC CTG MA.17 (letrozole vs. placebo to letrozole vs placebo) post unblinding

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 550-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. J. Robert ◽  
P. E. Goss ◽  
J. N. Ingle ◽  
D. Tu ◽  
L. Shepherd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Fractures ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Treatment Switch ◽  
Prolonged Delay ◽  
To Receive

550 Background: 5187 postmenopausal women were originally randomized to NCIC CTG MA.17 to receive letrozole (LET) or placebo (PLAC) after 5 years of tamoxifen. The hazard ratio (HR) for disease-free survival (DFS) was 0.58 (0.450.76, p=0.00004) after a median follow-up of 30 months (mo). The trial was unblinded in October 2003 after the first interim analysis. Women randomized to PLAC were offered LET at the time of unblinding. The goal of this analysis was to determine whether women switching from PLAC to LET benefit in terms of disease outcome and to evaluate treatment related toxicities. Methods: LET and PLAC-LET have been compared to PLAC, based on the hazard ratio and adjusting for baseline patient and disease variables including, among others, tumor size, nodal status and prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: Information about their follow-up treatment after unblinding was available on 2268 women originally assigned to PLAC and who were free of recurrence and alive at the time of unblinding. Among them, 1655 crossed over from PLAC to LET while 613 elected no treatment. With 54 mo f/up the HR for DFS was 0.31 (0.18, 0.55: p<0.0001) favoring patients who crossed over to LET compared to those who stayed on no treatment. The treatment switch was well tolerated with no significant difference in bone fractures or cardiovascular events. An updated analysis of DFS, DDFS and OS by nodal and tumor receptor status, prior chemotherapy, menopausal status at the start of tamoxifen, and duration of prior tamoxifen therapy will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: Women with hormone dependent breast cancer prescribed LET after a prolonged delay from completing tamoxifen experienced a significant improvement in outcome (DFS, DDFS, OS) and should be considered for this therapy. [Table: see text]

Results of a Randomized Study of Preradiation Chemotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Nonmetastatic Medulloblastoma: The International Society of Paediatric Oncology/United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group PNET-3 Study

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1581-1591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger E. Taylor ◽  
Clifford C. Bailey ◽  
Kath Robinson ◽  
Claire L. Weston ◽  
David Ellison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Study ◽  
Paediatric Oncology ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Study Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Radiotherapy Alone ◽  
To Receive

Purpose: To determine whether preradiotherapy (RT) chemotherapy would improve outcome for Chang stage M0–1 medulloblastoma when compared with RT alone. Chemotherapy comprised vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 weekly for 10 weeks and four cycles of etoposide 100 mg/m2 daily for 3 days, and carboplatin 500 mg/m2 daily for 2 days alternating with cyclophosphamide 1.5 g/m2. Patients and Methods: Patients aged 3 to 16 years inclusive were randomly assigned to receive 35 Gy craniospinal RT with a 20 Gy posterior fossa boost, or chemotherapy followed by RT. Results: Of 217 patients randomly assigned to treatment, 179 were eligible for analysis (chemotherapy + RT, 90 patients; RT alone, 89 patients). Median age was 7.67 years, and median follow-up was 5.40 years. Overall survival (OS) at 3 and 5 years was 79.5% and 70.7%, respectively. Event-free survival (EFS) at 3 and 5 years was 71.6% and 67.0%, respectively. EFS was significantly better for chemotherapy and RT (P = .0366), with EFS of 78.5% at 3 years and 74.2% at 5 years compared with 64.8% at 3 years and 59.8% at 5 years for RT alone. There was no statistically significant difference in 3-year and 5-year OS between the two arms (P = .0928). Multivariate analysis identified use of chemotherapy (P = .0248) and time to complete RT (P = .0100) as having significant effect on EFS. Conclusion: This is the first large multicenter randomized study to demonstrate improved EFS for chemotherapy compared with RT alone. It is anticipated that this regimen could reduce ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity compared with cisplatin-containing schedules. The importance of avoiding interruptions to RT has been confirmed.

scholarly journals Understanding the clinical reasoning processes involved in the management of multimorbidity in an ambulatory setting: study protocol of a stimulated recall research

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M.-C. Audétat ◽  
S. Cairo Notari ◽  
J. Sader ◽  
C. Ritz ◽  
T. Fassier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Clinical Reasoning ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Video Sequence ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Ambulatory Setting ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Stimulated Recall ◽  
Study Results

Abstract Background Primary care physicians are at the very heart of managing patients suffering from multimorbidity. However, several studies have highlighted that some physicians feel ill-equipped to manage these kinds of complex clinical situations. Few studies are available on the clinical reasoning processes at play during the long-term management and follow-up of patients suffering from multimorbidity. This study aims to contribute to a better understanding on how the clinical reasoning of primary care physicians is affected during follow-up consultations with these patients. Methods A qualitative research project based on semi-structured interviews with primary care physicians in an ambulatory setting will be carried out, using the video stimulated recall interview method. Participants will be filmed in their work environment during a standard consultation with a patient suffering from multimorbidity using a “button camera” (small camera) which will be pinned to their white coat. The recording will be used in a following semi-structured interview with physicians and the research team to instigate a stimulated recall. Stimulated recall is a research method that allows the investigation of cognitive processes by inviting participants to recall their concurrent thinking during an event when prompted by a video sequence recall. During this interview, participants will be prompted by different video sequence and asked to discuss them; the aim will be to encourage them to make their clinical reasoning processes explicit. Fifteen to twenty interviews are planned to reach data saturation. The interviews will be transcribed verbatim and data will be analysed according to a standard content analysis, using deductive and inductive approaches. Conclusion Study results will contribute to the scientific community’s overall understanding of clinical reasoning. This will subsequently allow future generation of primary care physicians to have access to more adequate trainings to manage patients suffering from multimorbidity in their practice. As a result, this will improve the quality of the patient’s care and treatments.

scholarly journals Cetuximab versus bevacizumab following prior FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab in postmenopausal women with advanced KRAS and BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer: a retrospective study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunlong Huang ◽  
Xiaoyuan Gu ◽  
Xianshang Zeng ◽  
Baomin Chen ◽  
Weiguang Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Inductive Treatment ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma

Abstract Background An upgraded understanding of factors (sex/estrogen) associated with survival benefit in advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC) could improve personalised management and provide innovative insights into anti-tumour mechanisms. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of cetuximab (CET) versus bevacizumab (BEV) following prior 12 cycles of fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) plus BEV in postmenopausal women with advanced KRAS and BRAF wild-type (wt) CRC. Methods Prospectively maintained databases were reviewed from 2013 to 2017 to assess postmenopausal women with advanced KRAS and BRAF wt CRC who received up to 12 cycles of FOLFOXIRI plus BEV inductive treatment, followed by CET or BEV maintenance treatment. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate. The secondary endpoint was the rate of adverse events (AEs). Results At a median follow-up of 27.0 months (IQR 25.1–29.2), significant difference was detected in median OS (17.7 months [95% confidence interval [CI], 16.2–18.6] for CET vs. 11.7 months [95% CI, 10.4–12.8] for BEV; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44–0.89; p=0.007); Median PFS was 10.7 months (95% CI, 9.8–11.3) for CET vs. 8.4 months (95% CI, 7.2–9.6) for BEV (HR, 0.67; 95% CI 0.47–0.94; p=0.02). Dose reduction due to intolerable AEs occurred in 29 cases (24 [24.0%] for CET vs. 5 [4.8%] for BEV; p< 0.001). Conclusions CET tends to be superior survival benefit when compared with BEV, with tolerated AEs.

scholarly journals Optimizing childhood oncology care transition from pediatric to adult settings: A survey of primary care physicians’ and residents’ perspectives

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. E14-23
Author(s):  
Sophie Marcoux, MD, PhD Marcoux ◽  
Caroline Laverdière
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Childhood Cancer ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Adult Survivors ◽  
Likert Scale ◽  
Care Transition ◽  
Term Care

Purpose: The majority of childhood cancer survivors suffer from late adverse effects after the completion of treatment. The prospect of most survivors reaching middle-age is a relatively new phenomenon, and the ways by which current and future primary care physicians (PCPs) will address this novel public health challenge are uncertain. Methods: A survey assessing knowledge level and information delivery preferences regarding long-term follow-up guidelines for adult patients having survived a childhood cancer was distributed by e-mail through the Quebec (Canada) national associations of PCPs and residents (n=238). Results: Participants reported an estimated average of 2.9 ± 1.9 cancer survivors in their yearly caseload, and only 35.3% recalled having provided services to at least one survivor in the last year. Most participants indicated ignoring validated follow-up guidelines for these patients (average score 1.66 on a Likert scale from “1—totally disagreeing” to “5—totally agreeing”). Scarce access to personalized follow-up guidelines and lack of clinical exposure to cancer survivors were identified as main obstacles in providing optimal care to these patients (respective averages of 1.66 and 1.84 on a Likert scale from “1— is a major obstacle” to “5—is not an obstacle at all”). Conclusion: The PCPs and residents rarely provide care for childhood cancer adult survivors. On an individual basis, there is a clear need for increased awareness, education and collaboration regarding long-term care of childhood cancer adult survivors during medical training. On a more global basis, structural, organizational and cultural changes are also needed to ensure adequate care transition.

scholarly journals Outcomes of decentralizing hypertension care from district hospitals to health centers in Rwanda, 2013–2014

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 142-147
Author(s):  
G. Ngoga ◽  
P. H. Park ◽  
R. Borg ◽  
G. Bukhman ◽  
E. Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Communicable Disease ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Blood Pressure Targets ◽  
District Hospitals ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Stage 1 ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Non Communicable Disease

Setting: Three district hospitals (DHs) and seven health centers (HCs) in rural Rwanda.Objective: To describe follow-up and treatment outcomes in stage 1 and 2 hypertension patients receiving care at HCs closer to home in comparison to patients receiving care at DHs further from home.Design: A retrospective descriptive cohort study using routinely collected data involving adult patients aged 18 years in care at chronic non-communicable disease clinics and receiving treatment for hypertension at DH and HC between 1 January 2013 and 30 June 2014.Results: Of 162 patients included in the analysis, 36.4% were from HCs. Patients at DHs travelled significantly further to receive care (10.4 km vs. 2.9 km for HCs, P < 0.01). Odds of being retained were significantly lower among DH patients when not adjusting for distance (OR 0.11, P = 0.01). The retention effect was consistent but no longer significant when adjusting for distance (OR 0.18, P = 0.10). For those retained, there was no significant difference in achieving blood pressure targets between the DHs and HCs.Conclusion: By removing the distance barrier, decentralizing hypertension management to HCs may improve long-term patient retention and could provide similar hypertension outcomes as DHs.

Efficacy of avelumab plus axitinib (A + Ax) versus sunitinib (S) by number of IMDC risk factors and tumor sites at baseline in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Extended follow-up results from JAVELIN Renal 101.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 302-302
Author(s):  
Yoshihiko Tomita ◽  
Robert J. Motzer ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Hideaki Miyake ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
To Receive

302 Background: In the phase III JAVELIN Renal 101 trial (NCT02684006), A + Ax demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) benefit across IMDC risk groups (favorable, intermediate, and poor) vs S in patients with previously untreated aRCC. Here we report efficacy of A + Ax vs S by number of IMDC risk factors (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4-6) and target tumor sites (1, 2, 3, and ≥4) at baseline from the second interim analysis of overall survival (OS). Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive A 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 wk + Ax 5 mg orally twice daily or S 50 mg orally once daily for 4 wk (6-wk cycle). PFS and ORR per independent central review (RECIST 1.1) and OS were assessed. Results: At data cut-off (Jan 2019), median (m) follow-up for OS and PFS was 19.3 vs 19.2 mo and 16.8 vs 15.2 mo for the A + Ax vs S arm, respectively. The table shows OS, PFS, and ORR by number of IMDC risk factors and target tumor sites at baseline. A + Ax generally demonstrated efficacy benefit vs S across subgroups. Conclusions: With extended follow-up, A + Ax generally demonstrated efficacy benefit vs S across the number of IMDC risk factors and tumor sites at baseline in aRCC. OS was still immature; follow-up for the final analysis is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02684006 . [Table: see text]

Improved survival for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 560-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
A J Mitus ◽  
K B Miller ◽  
D P Schenkein ◽  
H F Ryan ◽  
S K Parsons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Acute Myelogenous ◽  
To Receive

PURPOSE Despite improvement in chemotherapy and supportive care over the past two decades, overall survival for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) remains poor; only 25% to 30% of individuals with this disorder will be cured. In 1987, we initiated a prospective multiinstitution study designed to improve long-term survival in adults with AML. METHODS We modified the usual 7-day treatment scheme of daunorubicin and cytarabine with high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) on days 8 through 10 (3 + 7 + 3). Allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) was offered to all patients who entered complete remission (CR) to decrease the rate of leukemic relapse. Data were analyzed by intention to treat. RESULTS CRs were achieved in 84 of 94 patients (89%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 83 to 95). Because of the high remission rate, factors previously thought to predict outcome, such as cytogenetics, WBC count, French-American-British (FAB) classification, sex, and age, were not useful prognostic variables. The overall survival rate for the entire cohort of patients from data of diagnosis is 55% at 5 years. Sixty percent of all patients who achieved a CR underwent marrow grafting. There was no significant difference in event-free survival (EFS) at 5 years comparing patients assigned to receive allogeneic BMT with patients assigned to receive autologous BMT (56% v 45%, P = .54). CONCLUSION The long-term disease-free survival observed in this study is excellent compared with historical data. This improvement in survival is probably due to the high rate of remission induction, as well as to the effective nature of the consolidation therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document