Implementation of a multidisciplinary palliative and supportive care education lecture series.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 144-144
Author(s):  
Shawna Chan ◽  
Solomon Liao ◽  
Leslie M. Randall ◽  
Aaron Kheriaty ◽  
Rakhi Dayal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Spiritual Needs ◽  
Cultural Considerations ◽  
Lecture Series ◽  
Communication Goals ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Clinical Departments

144 Background: Nationwide surveys of residents including those in oncologic specialties reveal that trainees perceive their palliative and supportive care (PSC) educational curriculum as inadequate. For residents, PSC education varies from none at all to an organized department lecture series given by Palliative Medicine physicians. There have been no published experiences of institutional wide PSC lecture series open to all residents, fellows, and medical students. Methods: We piloted a monthly palliative care lecture series from August 2016 to June 2017 at UC Irvine. 12 physicians from 9 clinical departments provided monthly lectures on management of physical symptoms, psychosocial issues, cultural considerations, spiritual needs, care coordination, ethical/legal issues, communication/goals of care, and advance care planning. Lectures were advertised in advance to program directors and emails were sent the week prior to all trainees. At the end of each lecture, attendees were given a voluntary survey that consisted of 10 questions on self-perceived competency in PSC skills and 4 questions on attitudes toward PSC. Results: 143 (45 medical students, 98 residents) responses were received. Most residents (90.8%) and medical students (84.4%) viewed palliative care as an important competency. Only 16 responses from heme/onc, radiation, and gynecology oncology residents and fellows were received, comprising 11.2% of total responses. Residents characterized themselves as “not at all/minimally/somewhat confident” in their ability to care for patients with PSC issues in the following areas: management of opioids (44.2%), fatigue (82.7%), anorexia (79.6%), depression (65.3%), and prognostication (75.5%) Medical students characterized themselves as “not at all/minimally/somewhat confident” in the following areas: management of opioids (79.3%), fatigue (86.7%), anorexia (91.1%), depression (71.1%), and prognostication (91.1%). Conclusions: These findings suggest a need to further improve domains of palliative care training in residency programs and identify innovative ways to increase participation of residents and fellows from all oncologic specialties.

Palliative care issues encountered by radiation oncologists caring for advanced cancer patients.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14-14
Author(s):  
Gregory Parker ◽  
Virginia LeBaron ◽  
Monica Shalini Krishnan ◽  
Ron Y. Shiloh ◽  
Margarita Racsa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Coordination ◽  
Radiation Oncology ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Spiritual Needs ◽  
Goals Of Care ◽  
Cultural Considerations ◽  
Ethical And Legal Issues

14 Background: Palliative radiation therapy (PRT) is often administered to patients with advanced cancers. These patients may present to radiation oncology clinicians with other palliative care needs. To date, the types and frequencies of palliative care issues encountered in this setting have not been well characterized. Methods: This study assesses palliative care issues encountered by radiation oncology clinicians during PRT consults at 3 Boston-area, community and academic, hospital-based centers. For consecutive consults from 5/19/14 to 9/15/14, participating physicians and nurse practitioners complete a survey to identify and rank the relevance (5-point scale, 'not at all' to 'extremely') of palliative care issues. Eight domains adapted from national palliative care guidelines – physical symptoms, psychosocial issues, cultural considerations, spiritual needs, care coordination, advance care planning, goals of care, and ethical and legal issues – are evaluated. Preliminary descriptive statistics based on 51 completed surveys are reported (response rate = 94%; anticipated sample size = 198). Results: Most (82%) consults had 2 or more palliative care domains ranked as very or extremely relevant to patient care. The domains of physical symptoms (92%), care coordination (75%), and goals of care (57%) were very or extremely relevant in >50% of consults. Within these domains, the issues most often reported as relevant were interdisciplinary care coordination (92%), consideration of prognosis in treatment plan development (86%), pain management (71%), and discussion of patient values and priorities in treatment plan development (67%). Advanced care planning (24%), cultural considerations (10%), spiritual needs (10%), and ethical and legal issues (10%) were least commonly ranked as very or extremely relevant. Conclusions: Radiation oncology clinicians encounter multiple palliative care issues when consulting on patients for PRT. Clinicians identified physical symptoms, care coordination, and goals of care as the most relevant palliative care domains. These findings can help guide palliative care development within radiation oncology, including education and structures of care delivery.

Palliative medicine

2019 ◽  
pp. 547-556
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Occupational Therapists ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Spiritual Needs ◽  
Patient Symptom ◽  
Inpatient Nursing ◽  
Medical Teams

The chapter underlines the importance of early involvement of the palliative care team to help patients to live better and longer. Palliative care is a multidisciplinary specialty and the role of community and inpatient nursing staff, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, psychologists, and the bereavement, chaplaincy, and medical teams are discussed. The chapter also covers where palliative care is delivered, which can be at home as well as in a hospice or a hospital. Advice is given on where and when medical students can learn the most from the palliative care team, from listening to one of the palliative care consultants take a history to observing the palliative care team prescribing anticipatory medications for the dying patient. Symptom control, including pain, nausea and vomiting, anorexia, constipation, diarrhoea, and breathlessness are also discussed. The chapter focuses not only on the patient and her/his psychological and spiritual needs but also on family members and carers who might also have their own needs. The chapter underlines the importance of communication skills in palliative care and how medical students should observe carefully in either the hospice or in hospital to learn from interactions that are difficult as well as the ones that go well.

scholarly journals Advance care planning and palliative care in ACHD: the healthcare providers’ perspective

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 402-408
Author(s):  
Jill M. Steiner ◽  
Erwin N. Oechslin ◽  
Gruschen Veldtman ◽  
Craig S. Broberg ◽  
Karen Stout ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Psychosocial Needs ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Advance Care

ABSTRACTBackground:Advance care planning and palliative care are gaining recognition as critical care components for adults with CHD, yet these often do not occur. Study objectives were to evaluate ACHD providers’ 1) comfort managing patients’ physical symptoms and psychosocial needs and 2) perspectives on the decision/timing of advance care planning initiation and palliative care referral.Methods:Cross-sectional study of ACHD providers. Six hypothetical patients were described in case format, followed by questions regarding provider comfort managing symptoms, initiating advance care planning, and palliative care referral.Results:Fifty providers (72% physicians) completed surveys. Participants reported low levels of personal palliative care knowledge, without variation by gender, years in practice, or prior palliative care training. Providers appeared more comfortable managing physical symptoms and discussing prognosis than addressing psychosocial needs. Providers recognised advance directives as important, although the percentage who would initiate advance care planning ranged from 18 to 67% and referral to palliative care from 14 to 32%. Barriers and facilitators to discussing advance care planning with patients were identified. Over 20% indicated that advance care planning and end-of-life discussions are best initiated with the development of at least one life-threatening complication/hospitalisation.Conclusions:Providers noted high value in advance directives yet were themselves less likely to initiate advance care planning or refer to palliative care. This raises the critical questions of when, how, and by whom discussion of these important matters should be initiated and how best to support ACHD providers in these endeavours.

Provisional Educational Needs of Health Care Providers in Palliative Care in Three Nursing Homes in Ontario

1997 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 13-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Patterson ◽  
William Molloy ◽  
Rosalie Jubelius ◽  
G.H. Guyatt ◽  
M. Bédard
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Educational Needs ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Spiritual Needs ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Pharmacological Management ◽  
Traditional Lectures

Health care providers in three nursing homes in Ontario were surveyed to determine educational needs, barriers to meeting these needs, and the preferred format for education. Of the 415 health care providers asked to participate, 225 completed the questionnaire. Need was expressed for the majority of the 35 educational topics identified, including the role of the palliative care team, management of physical symptoms, pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of pain, stress management, spiritual needs, culture and death, and counseling. Group discussions and seminars were favored over traditional lectures. The primary factors influencing attendance at a palliative care workshop were loss of pay and time and location of the workshop.

Reducing patient suffering and preventing readmissions via supportive care screening: The James Cancer Hospital supportive-care screening model.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 33-33
Author(s):  
Sharla Wells-Di Gregorio ◽  
Alexandra Zaleta ◽  
Emily Porensky ◽  
Lisa Graham ◽  
Kelly McDowell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Distress Screening ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Screening Model ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Cancer Hospital

33 Background: Hospital admissions create physical, financial and emotional stress for oncology patients. Hospital avoidable readmissions are considered a marker of poorer quality patient care. To reduce readmissions, cancer hospitals must understand modifiable readmission risk factors AND establish screening systems to triage at-risk patients to outpatient palliative/supportive care services. The James Cancer Hospital is in Phase II development of a model to reduce patient suffering and readmission via the James Supportive Care Screening (JSCS), a 48-item validated clinical-research instrument. Methods: In 2013, the James Cancer Hospital began implementation of Supportive Care Screening to meet Standard 3.2 (Psychosocial Distress Screening) of the Commission on Cancer. The JSCS asks patients to rate distress in six palliative care domains including emotional concerns, physical symptoms, social/practical problems, spiritual problems, cognitive concerns, and healthcare decision-making/communication issues. Between January 2011 and December 2013, one-thousand and one patients completed the JSCS in the Outpatient Palliative Care clinic. During this period, 57 patients had at least one readmission. Hierarchical linear regression was used to predict the number of future readmissions with JSCS subscales as independent variables. Results: The overall model predicting readmissions was significant, F(7,959) = 37.074, p<.001. Time to readmission, physical symptoms, emotional concerns, spiritual concerns, and social concerns were significant predictors of patient readmission. We are currently examining palliative care outcomes in these domains and have found that outpatient palliative care significantly reduces suffering related to physical and emotional distress. Conclusions: Supportive care screening, can serve to reduce oncology readmissions and prevent patient suffering in six key palliative domains. During Phase II of the James Supportive Care Screening Model, we have identified several problem areas targeted to reduce readmissions and improve patient self-reported outcomes.

scholarly journals Innovative Models for High-Risk Patients Use Care Coordination and Palliative Supports to Reduce End-of-life Utilization and Spending

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Ruiz ◽  
Lynne Page Snyder ◽  
Katherine Giuriceo ◽  
Joanne Lynn ◽  
Erin Ewald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Care Coordination ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Care Transition ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Care Model ◽  
Advance Care

Abstract Background and Objectives Care coordination and palliative care supports are associated with reduced anxiety, fewer hospital admissions, and improved quality of life for patients and their families. Early palliative care can result in savings in the end-of-life period, but there is limited evidence that larger-scale models can improve both utilization and the cost of care. Three models that received Health Care Innovation Awards from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services aimed to improve quality of care and reduce cost through the use of innovative care coordination models. This study explores the total cost of care and selected utilization outcomes at the end-of-life for these innovative models, each of which enrolled adults with multiple chronic conditions and featured care coordination with advance care planning as a component of palliative care. These included a comprehensive at-home supportive care model for persons predicted to die within a year and two models offering advance care planning in nursing facilities and during care transitions. Research Design and Methods We used regression models to assess model impacts on costs and utilization for high-risk Medicare beneficiaries participating in the comprehensive supportive care model (N = 3,339) and the two care transition models (N = 587 and N = 277) who died during the study period (2013–2016), relative to a set of matched comparison patients. Results Comparing participants in each model who died during the study period to matched comparators, two of the three models were associated with significantly lower costs in the last 90 days of life ($2,122 and $4,606 per person), and the third model showed nonsignificant differences. Two of the three models encouraged early hospice entry in the last 30 days of life. For the comprehensive at-home supportive care model, we observed aggregate savings of nearly $19 million over the study period. One care transition model showed aggregate savings of over $500,000 during the same period. Potential drivers of these cost savings include improved patient safety, timeliness of care, and caregiver support. Discussion and Implications Two of the three models achieved significant lower Medicare costs than a comparison group and the same two models also sustained their models beyond the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services award period. These findings show promise for achieving palliative care goals as part of care coordination innovation.

Supportive care day hospital: A new tool for palliative care in cancer centers.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 170-170
Author(s):  
Carole Bouleuc
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Day Hospital ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
At Home

170 Background: In May 2005, the Curie Institute in Paris opened the first supportive care day hospital in France. This type of new ward is now very frequent in the French comprehensive cancer centers. Methods: Patients are managed by the palliative care team with a two-part team of a physician and a nurse in order to address their supportive care needs: advanced-care symptoms, psychosocial distress, medical questions and concerns, support need in decision making, end of life care preference and advance care plan when patients or caregivers when needed. Depending of the needs identified by the palliative care team assess, at least 2 of the following healthcare professionals will intervene: oncologist, pain physician, psycho-oncologist, dietitician, social worker, physiotherapist. Coordination with the home care team takes systematically place (with general practitioner, nurse and home palliative care team). New symptoms occurrence are explored with biological test or radiographic examination when necessary. Medical procedures are sometimes performed like venous perfusion therapy, blood transfusions, or draining effusion after ultrasonic tracking. It is possible to offer the patient hypnosis, relaxation or sophrology consultation. Eventually at the end of the in-patient stay, the patient is given a medical synthesis with therapeutic recommendations and personalized care plan. 1 Physician and two nurses are needed to manage 4 patients every day. Results: In 2016 we have admitted 350 patients and performed 948 stays in our supportive rand 55% of them have breast cancer. Median survival since the first day at supportive care day hospital is 65 days. Death at home occurred in 15% of patients and in hospice for 62%. Home death is more often when patients don’t have any dyspnea are included in a home palliative care network and when they receive the last chemotherapy more than 30 days before death. More date will be shown. Conclusions: Supportive care day hospital is really a good tool for integrated palliative care, promoting collaboration with oncologists, coordination with home care teams, and advance care planning, so that patients can longer stay at home as they often hope so.

Models for Operationalizing Supportive Care in Kidney Care

2020 ◽  
pp. 36-46
Author(s):  
Dale E. Lupu ◽  
Emma Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Program Success ◽  
Disease Case ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
The Impact

The field of kidney supportive care is in a period of innovation, with different models emerging from local efforts to improve care. We classify emerging models into six types: embedded, mobile/visiting, chronic kidney disease case management, medical management without dialysis, concurrent hospice/dialysis, and comprehensive regional or system-wide programs. Although individual programs have demonstrated positive impact on outcomes such as advance care planning and place of death, there is not yet systematic evidence comparing the impact of model type on effectiveness or cost effectiveness. Local considerations about need, resources, opportunities, and champions are key to planning a supportive kidney care strategy. Facilitators for program success include training for nephrology providers, active collaboration between nephrology and palliative care, local champions (often nurses), sensitive messaging about medical management without dialysis, and research to demonstrate program impact.

Lessons From the Development and Implementation of a Palliative Care Elective for Fourth-Year Medical Students: A Pilot Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katelyn D. Stepanyan ◽  
Timothy E. Weiss ◽  
Antonio M. Pessegueiro ◽  
Christopher J. Pietras
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Direct Observation ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Dying Patients ◽  
Powerful Learning ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Fourth Year Medical Students ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Future Work

Background: Although palliative care is recognized as an important component of medical school curricula, the content and structure of education in the field is variable and often lacks outpatient exposure. We aimed to develop and implement a palliative care clinical elective for fourth-year medical students incorporating both inpatient and outpatient learning. Methods: Fourteen medical students participated in a palliative care elective which included 2 weeks on an inpatient consult service and 1 week of outpatient clinic and home hospice visits. The elective was evaluated using a focus group and previously validated surveys assessing self-rated competency and attitudes toward caring for palliative care patients. Data were analyzed using paired t tests to compare survey response means before and after the elective. Results: Of the 14 participating students, 7 completed both the pre- and postelective surveys. Significant improvements in self-rated competency were seen in pain and symptom management ( P < .001), communication ( P < .001), and advance care planning ( P < .01). Survey results also showed improvement in attitudes toward caring for dying patients ( P < .001), with lower scores at the end of the elective suggesting reduced emotional distress. Although the outpatient component was hypothesized to be a major benefit of the curriculum, qualitative data revealed the most highly valued component to be direct observation and feedback during inpatient time. Conclusion: Given the highlighted importance of direct observation and feedback as a unique and powerful learning experience, future work should be targeted toward enhancing the quality and timeliness of feedback delivered by the palliative care interdisciplinary team.

scholarly journals Palliative care for people living with heart failure: European Association for Palliative Care Task Force expert position statement

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Z Sobanski ◽  
Bernd Alt-Epping ◽  
David C Currow ◽  
Sarah J Goodlin ◽  
Tomasz Grodzicki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Position Statement ◽  
Substantial Improvement ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Spiritual Needs ◽  
Emotional Healing ◽  
Incurable Disease ◽  
Advance Care

Abstract Contrary to common perception, modern palliative care (PC) is applicable to all people with an incurable disease, not only cancer. PC is appropriate at every stage of disease progression, when PC needs emerge. These needs can be of physical, emotional, social, or spiritual nature. This document encourages the use of validated assessment tools to recognize such needs and ascertain efficacy of management. PC interventions should be provided alongside cardiologic management. Treating breathlessness is more effective, when cardiologic management is supported by PC interventions. Treating other symptoms like pain or depression requires predominantly PC interventions. Advance Care Planning aims to ensure that the future treatment and care the person receives is concordant with their personal values and goals, even after losing decision-making capacity. It should include also disease specific aspects, such as modification of implantable device activity at the end of life. The Whole Person Care concept describes the inseparability of the physical, emotional, and spiritual dimensions of the human being. Addressing psychological and spiritual needs, together with medical treatment, maintains personal integrity and promotes emotional healing. Most PC concerns can be addressed by the usual care team, supported by a PC specialist if needed. During dying, the persons’ needs may change dynamically and intensive PC is often required. Following the death of a person, bereavement services benefit loved ones. The authors conclude that the inclusion of PC within the regular clinical framework for people with heart failure results in a substantial improvement in quality of life as well as comfort and dignity whilst dying.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document