Risk-assessed exercise and diet in prostate cancer survivors: Consequences of cancer treatment on cardiopulmonary fitness and cardiovascular risk.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 142-142
Author(s):  
Sara Faithfull ◽  
Jonathan Aning ◽  
Karen Poole ◽  
John Saxton ◽  
Bruce Griffin ◽  
...  

142 Background: Evidence from large observational studies suggests that men with prostate cancer have a higher risk of cardiovascular events due to accelerated atherosclerosis linked to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Adults > 70 years of age have poorer outcomes from cancer treatment in the UK. However, it is not yet clear what might be contributing to poorer outcomes among older men with prostate cancer. Thus the purpose of this study was to assess the health and fitness of a cohort of prostate cancer survivors, from 2 regions in the UK, and identify factors that may influence cardiovascular health. Methods: Baseline assessments from 83 men with prostate cancer with no evidence of distant disease particpated. Men undertook a Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET), sit to stand, step test, grip strength, hip to waist ratio, self-reported exercise questionnaire (Godin), and co-morbidity index. Men were 1-3 years post diagnosis. Age-group comparisons were made using analysis of covariance against cardiac risk profile (QRisk2). Results: Men who were older ( > 75) were more likely to have poorer cardiopulmonary fitness, as measured by VO2 Peak , and worse grip strength than age standardised values. Increased obesity across all groups (raised BMI) and higher B/P all contributed to a raised QRisk2 (mean: 36.9±6.1), which is higher than men of a similar age. Older men perceived themselves to be less physically active and were more likely to be on ADT. Conclusions: In our sample, men older than 75 had greater CVD risk, poorer physical function and lower strength. Improvements in diet and physical activity could improve physical function and reduce cardiovascular risk factors. Older men were more likely to be on ADT so to reduce long term co-morbidities other risk factors need to be addressed. More comprehensive functional health assessment at point of treatment could help clinicians optimise therapy to reduce long term comorbidities. [Table: see text]

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. iv35
Author(s):  
E. Verzoni ◽  
P. Grassi ◽  
R. Ratta ◽  
A. Mennitto ◽  
R. Montone ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Faithfull ◽  
Karen Poole ◽  
Agnieszka Lemanska ◽  
Bruce Griffin ◽  
Ralph Manders ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND The number of people living with and beyond a cancer diagnosis has increased, however survivors may experience long-term side-effects from treatment that can impact on physical fitness and cardiovascular health. Lifestyle interventions enhance outcomes after cancer treatment but innovations and technology are needed to provide consistency and scalability. Interventions to support exercise and dietary modification in secondary care settings have been limited by the lack of personalisation, clinician time and resources. Community pharmacies are well positioned to provide lifestyle advice for people with cancer and long-term conditions. This study is the first to develop a tailored lifestyle intervention using a computer algorithm to enable community pharmacists to provide personalised advice for cancer patients. OBJECTIVE To create a computer-based algorithm to support community pharmacists to deliver a tailored lifestyle intervention for men during and after treatment for prostate cancer. METHODS An observational study was conducted at two UK centres involving 83 men with prostate cancer who were 3-36 months’ post-diagnosis. Physical fitness, strength and cardiovascular health were assessed. Qualitative interviews were undertaken with 20 participants to understand their interpretation of the assessment and analysed using a framework analysis. These data were used to inform our computer-based algorithm and lifestyle prescriptions. RESULTS Physical fitness varied across participants. Limb strength was categorised with upper body strength low for 40% of men compared to their age (40 out of 83) and lower limb strength (44 of 83) 53% of men were low in comparison to age normative values. The Siconolfi step test provided classification of cardiopulmonary fitness with 26.5% (22 of 83) men unable to complete level 1 with very low physical fitness and 41% (34 of 83) of men moderate completing stage 2 of the test. Cardiovascular risk was categorised as high (>20% QRISK2) in 41% of men contributed to by the number of men who had a high hip to waist ratio 72 of 83 men (86.7%) indicating abdominal fat. Three emergent themes from the qualitative analysis highlighted different perceptions of the physical assessment experience. The algorithm provided a clear pathway for decision making, that it was safe and effective to enable community pharmacists to prescribe tailored lifestyle advice for men with prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS We have developed a computer algorithm that uses simple, safe and validated assessments to provide tailored lifestyle advice which addresses specific areas of cardiovascular risk, strength and physical fitness in men with prostate cancer. It generates a real-time lifestyle prescription at the point of care and has been integrated into the software platform used by pharmacies in the UK. The algorithm was integrated into the software platform used by pharmacies within the UK. CLINICALTRIAL The study was approved by the UK National Research Ethics Service REC 14/LO/0495 IRAS project ID 148309.


BMC Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Gong ◽  
Katie Harris ◽  
Sanne A. E. Peters ◽  
Mark Woodward

Abstract Background Sex differences in major cardiovascular risk factors for incident (fatal or non-fatal) all-cause dementia were assessed in the UK Biobank. The effects of these risk factors on all-cause dementia were explored by age and socioeconomic status (SES). Methods Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and women-to-men ratio of HRs (RHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), smoking, diabetes, adiposity, stroke, SES and lipids with dementia. Poisson regression was used to estimate the sex-specific incidence rate of dementia for these risk factors. Results 502,226 individuals in midlife (54.4% women, mean age 56.5 years) with no prevalent dementia were included in the analyses. Over 11.8 years (median), 4068 participants (45.9% women) developed dementia. The crude incidence rates were 5.88 [95% CI 5.62–6.16] for women and 8.42 [8.07–8.78] for men, per 10,000 person-years. Sex was associated with the risk of dementia, where the risk was lower in women than men (HR = 0.83 [0.77–0.89]). Current smoking, diabetes, high adiposity, prior stroke and low SES were associated with a greater risk of dementia, similarly in women and men. The relationship between blood pressure (BP) and dementia was U-shaped in men but had a dose-response relationship in women: the HR for SBP per 20 mmHg was 1.08 [1.02–1.13] in women and 0.98 [0.93–1.03] in men. This sex difference was not affected by the use of antihypertensive medication at baseline. The sex difference in the effect of raised BP was consistent for dementia subtypes (vascular dementia and Alzheimer’s disease). Conclusions Several mid-life cardiovascular risk factors were associated with dementia similarly in women and men, but not raised BP. Future bespoke BP-lowering trials are necessary to understand its role in restricting cognitive decline and to clarify any sex difference.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Bergum ◽  
I Sandven ◽  
TO Klemsdal

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): The Norwegian health department Background The evidence of the long-term effects of multiple lifestyle intervention on cardiovascular risk is uncertain. We aimed to summarize the evidence from randomized clinical trials examining the efficacy of lifestyle intervention on major cardiovascular risk factors in subjects at high cardiovascular risk. Methods  Eligible trials investigated the impact of lifestyle intervention versus usual care with minimum 24 months follow-up, reporting more than one major cardiovascular risk factor. A literature search updated April 15, 2020 identified 12 eligible studies. The results from individual trials were combined using fixed and random effect models, using the standardized mean difference (SMD) to estimate effect sizes. Small-study effect was evaluated, and heterogeneity between studies examined by subgroup and meta-regression analyses considering patient- and study-level variables. Results  Small-study effect was not identified. Lifestyle intervention reduced systolic blood pressure modestly with an estimated SMD of -0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.21 to -0.04, with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 59%), corresponding to a mean difference of approximately 2 mmHg (MD = -1.86, 95% CI: -3.14 to -0.57, p = 0.0046). This effect disappeared in the subgroup of trials judged at low risk of bias (SMD = 0.02, 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.11). For the outcome total cholesterol SMD was -0.06, 95% CI: -0.13 to 0.00, with no heterogeneity (I² = 0%), indicating no effect of the intervention. Conclusion  Lifestyle intervention resulted in only a modest effect on systolic blood pressure and no effect on total cholesterol after 24 months. Further lifestyle trials should consider the challenge of maintaining larger long-term benefits to ensure impact on cardiovascular outcomes.


Author(s):  
Sara Faithfull ◽  
Agnieszka Lemanska ◽  
Karen Poole ◽  
Jonathan Aning ◽  
Ralph Manders ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document