Osteosarcoma, Chondrosarcoma, and Chordoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy S. Whelan ◽  
Lara E. Davis

Osteosarcoma (OS), chondrosarcoma, and chordoma are characterized by multiple challenges to the investigator, clinician, and patient. One consequence of their rarity among sarcomas, as well as their biologic and clinical heterogeneity, is that management guidelines are inadequate to inform the range of individual patient-treatment decisions from diagnosis, approaches to surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, treatment of recurrence, palliative care, and quality of survivorship. Of high-grade sarcomas, OSs are among the most curable, with more than two-thirds of patients with localized disease likely to achieve long-term survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprising cisplatin, doxorubicin, and methotrexate with intercalated surgery is the standard of care for resectable OS in those younger than 40 years. Outcomes for OS presenting with unresectable metastases or recurrent disease, or in those older than 40 years are generally poor. Overall results have improved little for all patients with OS, and new treatments are needed. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of management for chondrosarcoma and chordoma. However, the application of new biologic insights to therapeutic development indicates that improved treatments may soon be routine for patients with chondrosarcoma and chordoma for whom surgery alone is inadequate. For all these uncommon diseases, patients should be offered specialist expert care delivered by experienced multidisciplinary teams in high-volume centers.

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1961 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 985-992
Author(s):  
Richard J. Bailey ◽  
E. Omer Burgert ◽  
David C. Dahlin

On the basis of observations made on 76 children with malignant lymphoma, of whom 28 had Hodgkin's disease (25 with Hodgkin's granuloma and 3 with Hodgkin's sarcoma) and 48 had lymphosarcoma, the following conclusions are drawn: Hodgkin's granuloma has a fairly prolonged course in childhood with a relatively good outlook for 5-year survival, but late recurrences are more common than in the lymphosarcoma group. Lymphosarcoma, excluding giant follicular lymphoma, has a more rapidly malignant course than does Hodgkin's granuloma, but long-term survival does occur in instances of localized disease involving the peripheral nodes on the small intestine. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy provide effective means for controlling Hodgkin's disease and giant follicular lymphoma, even when disease is widespread. Localized disease, when it occurs in malignant lymphoma, requires vigorous radiation treatment. In selected cases, radical surgical removal prior to radiation is indicated. The outlook for these patients is good.


Author(s):  
Daniel H. Ahn ◽  
Andrew H. Ko ◽  
Neal J. Meropol ◽  
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab

Pancreatic cancer remains the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States with a dismal prognosis and a 5-year survival of less than 5% across all stages.1In 2014, there were approximately 46,420 new cases of pancreatic cancer with only 9% of patients having localized disease.2Given that the vast majority of patients present with advanced disease, much of the focus for drug development has been in the metastatic setting, which is evident with the advent of two combination chemotherapy regimens for this indication. Although conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the standard of care, an ongoing search for novel therapeutic approaches continues. We will highlight several new approaches here, with a particular emphasis on immunotherapeutic strategies. We will also introduce concepts regarding the potential economic effects associated with the development and implementation of new treatments in pancreatic cancer.


2015 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 825-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Weil ◽  
Gaurav G. Mavinkurve ◽  
Samuel T. Chao ◽  
Michael A. Vogelbaum ◽  
John H. Suh ◽  
...  

OBJECT The authors assessed the feasibility of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) using a portable radiation source to treat newly diagnosed, surgically resected, solitary brain metastasis (BrM). METHODS In a nonrandomized prospective study, 23 patients with histologically confirmed BrM were treated with an Intrabeam device that delivered 14 Gy to a 2-mm depth to the resection cavity during surgery. RESULTS In a 5-year minimum follow-up period, progression-free survival from the time of surgery with simultaneous IORT averaged (± SD) 22 ± 33 months (range 1–96 months), with survival from the time of BrM treatment with surgery+IORT of 30 ± 32 months (range 1–96 months) and overall survival from the time of first cancer diagnosis of 71 ± 64 months (range 4–197 months). For the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA), patients with a score of 1.5–2.0 (n = 12) had an average posttreatment survival of 21 ± 26 months (range 1–96 months), those with a score of 2.5–3.0 (n = 7) had an average posttreatment survival of 52 ± 40 months (range 5–94 months), and those with a score of 3.5–4.0 (n = 4) had an average posttreatment survival of 17 ± 12 months (range 4–28 months). A BrM at the treatment site recurred in 7 patients 9 ± 6 months posttreatment, and 5 patients had new but distant BrM 17 ± 3 months after surgery+IORT. Six patients later received whole-brain radiation therapy, 7 patients received radiosurgery, and 2 patients received both treatments. The median Karnofsky Performance Scale scores before and 1 and 3 months after surgery were 80, 90, and 90, respectively; at the time of this writing, 3 patients remain alive with a CNS progression-free survival of > 90 months without additional BrM treatment. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of resection combined with IORT at a dose of 14 Gy to a 2-mm peripheral margin to treat a solitary BrM. Local control, distant control, and long-term survival were comparable to those of other commonly used modalities. Surgery combined with IORT seems to be a potential adjunct to patient treatment for CNS involvement by systemic cancer.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2024-2024
Author(s):  
Ryan D. Gentzler ◽  
Andrew M. Evens ◽  
Alfred W. Rademaker ◽  
Bharat B Mittal ◽  
Adam M. Petrich ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2024 Background: For patients with relapsed or refractory HL, salvage chemotherapy followed by aHSCT is the standard of care. Our group previously reported excellent clinical outcomes with accelerated hyperfractionated TLI followed by high-dose chemotherapy and aHSCT (Ann of Oncol. 16:679, 2007). This strategy has been adopted as the standard at our institution for eligible individuals and we now report long-term outcomes of patients previously reported on the phase I/II clinical trial in addition to those who were subsequently treated as standard of care. Patients and methods: Patients with biopsy confirmed relapsed/refractory classical HL who previously received no more than 20 Gy were eligible. Salvage chemotherapy was chosen by the patient's treating physician. All patients received accelerated hyperfractionated TLI prior to transplantation administered twice daily at 150 cGy, five days/week for 10 days. The morning dose was delivered to all nodal sites including the spleen, and the afternoon dose was delivered to all sites of previous and current disease. The goal was to treat uninvolved nodal sites and spleen to 1500 cGy and sites of current and previous disease to 3000 cGy. Conditioning chemotherapy consisted of high-dose carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide. All patients received carboplatin 450 mg/m2 by continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) on days –6 to –4 (total dose = 1350 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg/day over 1 h on days –3 and –2 (total dose = 120 mg/kg). Patients on the phase I portion of the trial received escalating doses of etoposide by CIV from days –6 to –4. Initial dosing levels were 400 mg/m2/day, 450 mg/m2/day, 500 mg/m2/day, 600 mg/m2/day and 700 mg/m2/day. Those treated on the phase II portion of the clinical trial or subsequent to the closing of the trial were treated with etoposide 700 mg/m2/day for a total of 2100 mg/m2. Results: 52 patients with relapsed/refractory HL at Northwestern University were treated with TLI and aHSCT from 1993 to January 2011. One patient was lost to follow-up immediately post-transplant. 51 patients were included in this analysis and had a median follow-up of 47 months (range: 0.07–204 months). Thirty patients were treated on a previously reported prospective phase I/II clinical trial. Most patients had nodular sclerosis histology (n=39, 76%) and more than half had primary induction failure (PIF; n=29). Among patients who achieved a CR with induction, 62% relapsed within one year. The most common salvage regimens were ESHAP and ICE chemotherapy and most had received two lines of chemotherapy prior to aHSCT. Only 21 patients (41%) achieved a complete response (CR) with salvage therapy and in most cases (n=31, 61%), response was determined by functional imaging prior to aHSCT. The 10-year PFS and OS for all patients were 56% and 54%, respectively. Ten-year PFS and OS for patients with PIF was 53%, compared with 63% and 59%, respectively, for those with relapsed disease (p=0.13 and p=0.20, respectively). Patients who had incomplete responses to salvage therapy had a 10-year PFS and OS of 41% and 39%, respectively, compared to 76% and 81%, respectively, for those who achieved a CR (p=0.1 and p=0.056, respectively). Treatment-related mortality within the first 100 days was observed in one patient. Five patients (10%) developed secondary malignancies; three developed MDS (one who had received MOPP induction died with MDS; one had relapsed HL post-aHSCT and died of AML and one is alive with MDS 3+ yrs post-diagnosis). There was one case each of T-cell lymphoma (7 months post-aHSCT) and melanoma. Conclusions: Sequential TLI/chemotherapy conditioning for relapsed/refractory HL for patients with limited or no prior radiotherapy continues to be associated with excellent disease control and long-term survival rates including high-risk populations such as PIF and chemotherapy-resistant disease. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 426-426
Author(s):  
Manabu Kawai ◽  
Yoshiaki Murakami ◽  
Seiko Hirono ◽  
Ken-Ichi Okada ◽  
Fuyuhiko Motoi ◽  
...  

426 Background: There is a few reports that evaluates the association between pancreatic and long-term survival after pancreatectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to elucidate the oncological impact of pancreatic fistula (PF) on long-term survival after pancreatectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer by performing a survey of high volume centers for pancreatic resection in Japan. Methods: Between January 2001 and December 2012, 1,369 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer at 7 high-volume centers in Japan were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Pancreatic fistula(PF) occurred in 320 of 1,369 patients (23.5%), and these were classified based ISGPF as follows; grade A in 10.2%, grade B in 10.7%, and grade C in 2.6% of the patients. Median survival time (MST) in no fistula/grade A, grade B and grade C were 24.0, 26.3 and 11.0 months, respectively. MST in grade B PF was similar with that in no fistula/grade A. However, patients with grade C PF had a significantly poorer survival than those without (P<0.001). In the multivariate cox proportional hazard analysis, grade C PF was detected as an independent prognostic factor after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer (hazard ratio (HR) 2.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40-3.29; P< 0.001). Conclusions: Grade C PF adversely affects long-term survival of patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing pancreatectomy, although patients with grade B PF have similar prognosis with no fistula/grade A. Postoperative management to prevent grade C PF is important to improve prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing pancreatectomy.


Author(s):  
J.N. Scott ◽  
N.B. Rewcastle ◽  
P.M.A. Brasher ◽  
D. Fulton ◽  
N.A. Hagen ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT:Background:Long-term glioblastoma multiforme survivors (LTGBMS) are uncommon. The frequency which these occur in an unselected population and factors which produce these unusually long survivors are unknown.Objectives:To determine in a population- based study 1) the frequency of LTGBMS in a population and 2) identify which patient, treatment or tumor characteristics would predict which glioblastoma (GBM) patient would become a LTGBMS.Methods:The Alberta Cancer Registry was used to identify all patients diagnosed with GBM in southern Alberta between 1/1/75 - 12/31/91. Patient charts were reviewed and histology re-examined by a blinded neuropathologist. LTGBMS were defined as GBM patients surviving ≥ 3 years after diagnosis. Each LTGBMS was compared to three age-, gender-, and year of diagnosis-matched controls to compare patient, treatment, and tumor factors to GBM patients without long-term survival.Results:There were 279 GBMs diagnosed in the study period. Five (1.8%) survived ≥ three years (range, 3.2-15.8 years). Seven additional long-term survivors, who carried a diagnosis of GBM, were excluded after neuropathologic review; the most common revised diagnosis was malignant oligodendroglioma. LTGBMS (avg. age = 45 years) were significantly younger when compared to all GBM patients (avg. age = 59 years, p - 0.0001) diagnosed in the study period. LTGBMS had a higher KPS at diagnosis (p = 0.001) compared to controls. Tumors from LTGBMS tended to have fewer mitoses and a lower Ki-67 cellular proliferative index compared to controls. Radiation-induced dementia was common and disabling in LTGBMS.Conclusions:These data highlight the dismal prognosis for GBM patients who have both a short median survival and very small chance (1.8%) of long-term survival. The LTGBMS were younger, had a higher performance status, and their tumors tended to proliferate less rapidly than control GBM patients. When long-term survival does occur it is often accompanied by severe treatment-induced dementia.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raphaël A. Itzykson ◽  
Elise Fournier ◽  
Celine Berthon ◽  
Christoph Röllig ◽  
Thorsten Braun ◽  
...  

To design a simple and reproducible classifier predicting the overall survival (OS) of AML patients ≥ 60 years old treated with 7+3, we sequenced 37 genes in 471 patients from the ALFA1200 study (NCT01966497, median age 68 years). Mutation patterns and OS differed between the 84 patients with poor-risk cytogenetics and the 387 patients with good (N=13), intermediate (N=339) or unavailable (N=35) cytogenetic risk. TP53 (HR=2.49; P=0.0003) and KRAS (HR=3.60; P=0.001) mutations independently worsened OS of patients with poor-risk cytogenetics. In those without poor-risk cytogenetics, NPM1 (HR=0.57; P=0.0004), FLT3-ITDs with low (HR=1.85; P=0.0005) or high (HR=3.51; P&lt;10-4) allelic ratio, DNMT3A (HR=1.86; P&lt;10-4), NRAS (HR=1.54; P=0.019) and ASXL1 (HR=1.89; P=0.0003) mutations independently predicted OS. Combining cytogenetic risk and mutations in these 7 genes, 39.1% of patients could be assigned to a 'go-go' tier with a 2-year OS of 66.1%, 7.6% to the 'no-go' group (2-year OS 2.8%) while the 53.3% 'slow-go' patients had a 2-year OS of 39.1% (P&lt;10-5). Across three independent validation cohorts, 31.2-37.7% and 11.2-13.5% of patients were assigned to the 'go-go' and the 'no-go' tiers respectively, with significant differences in OS between tiers in all 3 cohorts (HDF, N=141, P=0.003, SAL N=466 and AMLSG N=223, both P&lt;10-5). The ALFA decision tool is a simple, robust and discriminant prognostic model for AML patients older than 60 years treated with intensive chemotherapy. This model can instruct the design of trials comparing the 7+3 standard of care with less intensive regimens.


2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arman Kilic ◽  
Thomas G Gleason ◽  
Hiroshi Kagawa ◽  
Ahmet Kilic ◽  
Ibrahim Sultan

Abstract OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of institutional volume on long-term outcomes following lung transplantation (LTx) in the USA. METHODS Adults undergoing LTx were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry. Patients were divided into equal size tertiles according to the institutional volume. All-cause mortality following LTx was evaluated using the risk-adjusted multivariable Cox regression and the Kaplan–Meier analyses, and compared between these volume cohorts at 3 points: 90 days, 1 year (excluding 90-day deaths) and 10 years (excluding 1-year deaths). Lowess smoothing plots and receiver-operating characteristic analyses were performed to identify optimal volume thresholds associated with long-term survival. RESULTS A total of 13 370 adult LTx recipients were identified. The mean annual centre volume was 33.6 ± 20.1. After risk adjustment, low-volume centres were found to be at increased risk for 90-day mortality, [hazard ratio (HR) 1.56, P < 0.001], 1-year mortality excluding 90-day deaths (HR 1.46, P < 0.001) and 10-year mortality excluding 1-year deaths (HR 1.22, P < 0.001). These findings persisted when the centre volume was modelled as a continuous variable. The Kaplan–Meier analysis also demonstrated significant reductions in survival at each of these time points for low-volume centres (each P < 0.001). The 10-year survival conditional on 1-year survival was 37.4% in high-volume centres vs 28.0% in low-volume centres (P < 0.001). The optimal annual volume threshold for long-term survival was 26 LTx/year. CONCLUSIONS The institutional volume impacts long-term survival following LTx, even after excluding deaths within the first post-transplant year. Identifying the processes of care that lead to longer survival in high-volume centres is prudent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document