Resection of pancreatic cancer following induction chemotherapy.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 406-406
Author(s):  
Walid Labib Shaib ◽  
Layal Sayegh ◽  
Olatunji Alese ◽  
Shishir Maithel ◽  
Kenneth Cardona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Borderline Resectable

406 Background: Survival of resectable pancreas cancer (RPC) treated with resection and adjuvant therapy is 22-28 months (mo). Locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treated with combination chemotherapy have a median survival of 24 mo. The objective of this project is to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant treatment on survival outcome of localized PC. Methods: Charts of localized PC patients treated at Emory University from 2009 to 2016 were reviewed. Information on demographics, stage and treatment was collected. Survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazard model was fitted to estimate the adjusted effect of treatment on overall survival(OS). Results: A total of 415 patients were included; 144 RPC, 158 borderline resectable (BRPC) and 108 LAPC. Stage was determined at the multidisciplinary conference. The median age was 67.7 years (30-92); 49% male, and 63% Caucasians. The median OS for RPC, BRPC, and LAPC was 16.9, 14.6 and 10.9 mo, respectively. Stage, type of chemotherapy and age were significant predictors of OS after adjusting for gender, race, age, surgery, stage, chemotherapy, margins and radiation. Of the 144 RPC, 137 underwent surgery and 3 received neoadjuvant treatment; 73 RPC were followed in outside facility with missing follow up data. Of the 71 RPC treated at Emory; 91% received adjuvant gemcitabine. Of the 158 BRPC, 84 underwent surgery; 44 received FOLFIRINOX neoadjuvant therapy, 23 received gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, and 16 received gemcitabine single agent. BRPC patients who underwent resection had a median OS of 18.5 mo (95%CI: 14.2, 26.4), significantly longer than RPC (P = 0.044). Combination chemotherapy was significantly associated with improved OS at 36 mo (38.9%) when compared to single agent gemcitabine (6.3% at 36 mo) (p = 0.009). BRPC patients who received FOLFORINOX and surgery had a median OS of 31.5 mo. Conclusions: Overall survival of BRPC patients who undergo resection after FOLFIRINOX is significantly improved (more than doubled) compared to upfront resection for RPC. Preoperative therapy provides the best approach for systemic disease early in the course of treatment.

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with borderline or locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Is it safe and feasible?

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 685-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Oba ◽  
Christopher Hanyoung Lieu ◽  
Cheryl Lauren Meguid ◽  
Sarah Lindsey Davis ◽  
Alexis Diane Leal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Survival Advantage ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

685 Background: For borderline resectable (BRPC) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), neoadjuvant (NAT) FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) are standard treatment options and these regimens have shown a survival advantage over single-agent gemcitabine. However, the role of these modern therapeutic regimens in elderly patients is debatable. In this analysis, we evaluated the outcomes of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) with combination chemotherapy in elderly patients. Methods: 230 consecutive patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment for BRPC/LAPC discussed and planned for NAT at the University of Colorado Cancer Center from January 2011 to March 2019 were reviewed. 214 patients who received FOLFIRINOX (n = 143) or GnP (n = 71) were eligible for analysis. We divided all patients into three groups ( < 70, 70-74, ≥75 years) and compared the short-term and long-term outcomes. Results: Of 214 patients, patients < 70 (n = 147) received FOLFIRINOX more frequently than the other groups (p < 0.001): FOLFIRINOX: 115 cases, GnP: 32 cases, 70-74 years (n = 33): FOLFIRINOX: 15 cases, GnP: 18 cases, and ≥75 years (n = 34): FOLFIRINOX: 13 cases, GnP: 21 cases. Resection rates were not statistically different between three groups ( < 70: 62%, 70-74: 70%, ≥75 years: 56%, p = 0.504). There was a slight trend towards worse survival in the two older groups (Median Survival Time [MST]: < 70: 23.2 mo., 70-74: 19.5 mo., ≥75 years: 17.6 mo., p = 0.075) The FOLFIRINOX group was superior to GnP group in all three groups (MST: < 70: 25.6 vs 18.2 mo., p = 0.017; 70-74: 33.2 vs 16.1mo., p = 0.029; ≥75 years: not reached vs 16.1 mo., p = 0.135). There were no toxic deaths or 30 day mortality after pancreatectomy in the study population. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy regimens were safe and feasible for elderly patients. Neoadjuvant therapy with FOLFIRINOX was associated with a survival advantage vs GnP and is an good option for fit and elderly patients ≥75 years.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced unresectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: oncological outcomes at a single academic centre

ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. e000929
Author(s):  
Susana Roselló ◽  
Claudio Pizzo ◽  
Marisol Huerta ◽  
Elena Muñoz ◽  
Roberto Aliaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Dismal Prognosis

IntroductionPancreatic cancer (PC), even in the absence of metastatic disease, has a dismal prognosis. One-third of them are borderline resectable (BRPC) or locally advanced unresectable PC (LAUPC) at diagnosis. There are limited prospective data supporting the best approach on these tumours. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ChT) is being increasingly used in this setting.MethodsThis is a retrospective series of consecutive patients staged as BRPC or LAUPC after discussion in the multidisciplinary board (MDB) at an academic centre. All received neoadjuvant ChT, followed by chemoradiation (ChRT) in some cases, and those achieving enough downstaging had a curative-intent surgery. Descriptive data about patient’s characteristics, neoadjuvant treatments, toxicities, curative resections, postoperative complications, pathology reports and adjuvant treatment were collected. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.ResultsBetween August 2011 and July 2019, 49 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and all of them received neoadjuvant ChT. Fluorouracil+folinic acid, irinotecan and oxaliplatin was the most frequently used scheme (77%). The most prevalent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (26.5%), neurotoxicity (12.2%), diarrhoea (8.2%) and nausea (8.2%). 18 patients (36.7%) received ChRT thereafter. In total, 22 patients (44,9%) became potentially resectable and 19 of them had an R0 or R1 pancreatic resection. One was found to be unresectable at surgery and two refused surgery. A vascular resection was required in 7 (35%). No postoperative deaths were observed. Postoperative ChT was given to 12 (66.7%) of resected patients. Median OS of the whole cohort was 24,9 months (95% CI 14.1 to 35.7), with 30.6 months for resected and 13.1 months for non-resected patients, respectively (p<0.001).ConclusionA neoadjuvant approach in BRPC and LAUPC was well tolerated and allowed a curative resection in 38.8% of them with a potential improvement on OS.

Decrease in CA-19-9 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy to predict survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
Jaswinder Singh ◽  
Syed Faisal Jafri ◽  
Maninder Pabla ◽  
Bradley L. Freilich ◽  
Joe Cates ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Borderline Resectable

12 Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is among the most lethal of human cancers. Data on overall survival rates of patients treated in the community hospital setting are limited. The purpose of this retrospective data collection study was to assess the CA19-9 change during the neo-adjuvant treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients and whether this test predicts the overall survival (OS). This study was conducted within a high volume community hospital setting. Methods: Eligibility included cytological or histological evidence of locally advanced, unresectable, and borderline resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, not amenable for surgical resection. Resectability was determined with EUS and CT scan/MRI and was discussed in the multi-disciplinary conference. Patients diagnosed before July 2009 were treated with continuous 5-FU 200mg/m2 for 5 weeks with radiation of 1.8 Gy per daily fraction, for a total dose of 50.4 Gy over 5.5 weeks. Patients diagnosed after July 2009 received gemcitabine 400mg/m2 intravenously (over 60 minutes) beginning on the first day of radiation therapy (before radiation), then weekly thereafter during radiation. Results: Data were abstracted on 64 patients (40 deceased; 24 alive) diagnosed between 6/2005 and 4/2011. The median age was 68 years (range 41-87), and 52% were male. The majority of patients (97%) were diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with biopsy. At diagnosis, 56 (88%) patients were locally advanced unresectable (without metastasis) or borderline resectable; 49 of these had neoadjuvant treatment, and 13 were later resected. Median OS for all 64 patients was 45.4 weeks (95% CI: 29.6-61.3), with no significant differences in OS by sex of patient (p = 0.210) or smoking history (p = 0.625). Twenty-two patients (34%) had >75% decreases in CA19-9 from baseline; median OS was 89.4 weeks in this group compared to 41.3 weeks in patients with changes in CA19-9 <75% (p = 0.025). Conclusions: This trial demonstrates improved overall survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, who had significant decrease in CA19-9 (>75% decreases in CA19-9 from baseline) in response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation.

Decrease in CA-19-9 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy to predict survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14632-e14632
Author(s):  
Jaswinder Singh ◽  
Syed Faisal Jafri ◽  
Maninder Pabla ◽  
Bradley L Freilich ◽  
Joe Cates ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Borderline Resectable

e14632 Background: Carcinoma of the pancreas is among the most lethal of human cancers. Data on the overall survival rates of patients treated in the community hospital setting are limited; the purpose of this retrospective data collection study was to assess – Does CA-19-9 change during the neo adjuvant treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients predicts the overall survival (OS) at high volume community hospital setting. Methods: Eligibility included cytological or histological evidence of locally advanced unresectable and borderline resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, not amenable for complete surgical resection. Their respectability was determined with EUS and CT scan / MRI and was discussed in the multi disciplinary conference. Patients diagnosed before July 2009 were essentially treated with continuous 5-FU 200 mg/m2 for 5 weeks with radiation of 1.8 Gy per daily fraction, for a total dose of 50.4 Gy over 5.5 weeks. Patients diagnosed after July 2009 received gemcitabine 400 mg/m2 intravenously (over 60 minutes) beginning on the first day of radiation therapy (before radiation), then weekly thereafter during radiation. Results: Data were abstracted on 64 patients (40 deceased; 24 alive) diagnosed between 6/2005 and 4/2011. The median age was 68 years (range: 41-87), and 52% were male. The majority of patients (97%) were diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with biopsy. At diagnosis, 56 (88%) patients were locally advanced unresectable(without metastasis) or borderline unresectable; 49 of these had neoadjuvant treatment, and 13 were later resected. Median OS for all 64 patients was 45.4 weeks (95% CI: 29.6-61.3), with no significant differences in OS by sex of patient (p = 0.210) or smoking history (p = 0.625). Twenty-two patients (34%) had >75% decreases in CA19-9 from baseline; median OS was 89.4 weeks in this group compared to 41.3 weeks in patients with changes in CA19-9 <75% (p = 0.025). Conclusions: This trial demonstrates improved overall survival in patients for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer , who had significant decrease in CA -19-9 (>75% decreases in CA19-9 from baseline) in response to neo adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation.

Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory C Wilson ◽  
Brent T Xia ◽  
Syed A Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Borderline Resectable

Despite decades of advancement and research into the multimodal care of pancreatic cancer, mortality after the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains grim. The role of adjuvant therapy following surgical resection has been well established in the literature. However, adjuvant therapy is imperfect, and outside of a clinical trial, there are high rates of omission or delayed initiation of therapy. Neoadjuvant treatment strategies continue to be explored in the management of resectable, borderline-resectable, and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. With improved resection rates and the possibility for tumor downstaging, neoadjuvant therapy has become standard for patients with borderline-resectable and locally advanced unresectable tumors. Additional benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of resectable tumors include improved completion rates of systemic therapy and R0 resection rates. Future clinical trials, including the use of novel treatment agents and combination treatment strategies in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens, will add value to the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Key words: adjuvant therapy, borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer, locally advanced pancreatic cancer, neoadjuvant therapy, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, resectable disease 

scholarly journals Current Clinical Strategies of Pancreatic Cancer Treatment and Open Molecular Questions

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (18) ◽  
pp. 4543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian Brunner ◽  
Zhiyuan Wu ◽  
Christian Krautz ◽  
Christian Pilarsky ◽  
Robert Grützmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Carcinoma ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Tumor Biopsies

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies and is associated with a poor prognosis. Surgery is considered the only potential curative treatment for pancreatic cancer, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, but surgery is reserved for the minority of patients with non-metastatic resectable tumors. In the future, neoadjuvant treatment strategies based on molecular testing of tumor biopsies may increase the amount of patients becoming eligible for surgery. In the context of non-metastatic disease, patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma might benefit from neoadjuvant chemo- or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgeryPatients with locally advanced or (oligo-/poly-)metastatic tumors presenting significant response to (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy should undergo surgery if R0 resection seems to be achievable. New immunotherapeutic strategies to induce potent immune response to the tumors and investigation in molecular mechanisms driving tumorigenesis of pancreatic cancer may provide novel therapeutic opportunities in patients with pancreatic carcinoma and help patient selection for optimal treatment.

Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Tipifarnib Compared With Gemcitabine Plus Placebo in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1430-1438 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Van Cutsem ◽  
H. van de Velde ◽  
P. Karasek ◽  
H. Oettle ◽  
W.L. Vervenne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose To determine whether addition of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib (Zarnestra, R115777; Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium) to standard gemcitabine therapy improves overall survival in advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients and Methods This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared gemcitabine + tipifarnib versus gemcitabine + placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma previously untreated with systemic therapy. Tipifarnib was given at 200 mg bid orally continuously; gemcitabine was given at 1,000 mg/m2 intravenously weekly × 7 for 8 weeks, then weekly × 3 every 4 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points included 6-month and 1-year survival rates, progression-free survival, response rate, safety, and quality of life. Results Six hundred eighty-eight patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two treatment arms. No statistically significant differences in survival parameters were observed. The median overall survival for the experimental arm was 193 v 182 days for the control arm (P = .75); 6-month and 1-year survival rates were 53% and 27% v 49% and 24% for the control arm, respectively; median progression-free survival was 112 v 109 days for the control arm. Ten drug-related deaths were reported for the experimental arm and seven for the control arm. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia grade ≥ 3 were observed in 40% and 15% in the experimental arm versus 30% and 12% in the control arm. Incidences of nonhematologic adverse events were similar in two groups. Conclusion The combination of gemcitabine and tipifarnib has an acceptable toxicity profile but does not prolong overall survival in advanced pancreatic cancer compared with single-agent gemcitabine.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer: An Emerging Strategy

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Bittoni ◽  
Matteo Santoni ◽  
Andrea Lanese ◽  
Chiara Pellei ◽  
Kalliopi Andrikou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Tumour Response ◽  
Tumour Regression ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Tumour Implantation

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths among men and women, being responsible for 6% of all cancer-related deaths. Surgical resection offers the only chance of cure, but only 15 to 20 percent of cases are potentially resectable at presentation. In recent years, increasing evidences support the use of neoadjuvant strategies in pancreatic cancer in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer as well as in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced PDAC in order to allow early treatment of micrometastatic disease, tumour regression, and reduced risk of peritoneal tumour implantation during surgery. Furthermore, neoadjuvant treatment allows evaluation of tumour response and increases patient’s compliance. However, most evidences in this setting come from retrospective analysis or small case series and in many studies chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapies used were suboptimal. Currently, prospective randomized trials using the most active chemotherapy regimens available are trying to define the real benefit of neoadjuvant strategies compared to conventional adjuvant strategies. In this review, the authors examined available data on neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer as well as in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced PDAC and the future directions in this peculiar setting.

scholarly journals Impact of New Chemotherapy Regimens on the Treatment Landscape and Survival of Locally Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Kieler ◽  
Matthias Unseld ◽  
Daniela Bianconi ◽  
Martin Schindl ◽  
Gabriela V. Kornek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line

Background: New chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer have changed the therapy paradigm. We aimed to assess their impact on the treatment landscape and clinical outcome at our academic institution. Methods: In this single institutional posthoc registry analysis, we assessed characteristics and survival rates from all patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer who started a systemic treatment between 01/2011 and 12/2017. Survival analyses were performed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards model. Results: A total of 301 patients started a systemic treatment in the observation period. In the first line treatment, we observed a shift from the four different main regimens (gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, modified FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine/oxaliplatin +/− erlotinib or gemcitabine alone) to gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel and modified FOLFIRINOX that add up to more than 80% of administered first line treatments in each of the time cohorts (2011–2013 vs. 2014–2017). The rate for first line modified FOLFIRINOX treatment was balanced between the two groups (19% and 15%). Median overall survival differed significantly between the two time cohorts (8.89 versus 11.9 months, p = 0.035). Survival rates for different first to second line treatment sequences (modified FOLFIRINOX to gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel to fluoropyrimidines plus nanoliposomal irinotecan, or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel to fluoropyrimidines plus oxaliplatin) were not significantly different and median overall survival ranged from 14.27 to 15.64 months. Conclusion: Our study provides real-world evidence for the effectiveness of the new chemotherapy regimens and underscores the importance of the choice of the front-line regimen when considering different sequencing strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document