Comparison of the real-world adherence and compliance patterns with trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and regorafenib (REG) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 666-666
Author(s):  
Anuj K. Patel ◽  
Mei Sheng Duh ◽  
Victoria Barghout ◽  
Mihran Ara Yenikomshian ◽  
Yongling Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Medication Possession Ratio ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
The Us ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Observation Period

666 Background: FTD/TPI and REG both prolong survival in refractory mCRC and have similar indications with different side effect profiles. This study compares real-world treatment patterns with FTD/TPI and REG for mCRC in a large, representative US claims database. Methods: Retrospective data from 10/2014 to 7/2016 from the US Symphony Health Solutions’ Integrated Dataverse (IDV®) database were analyzed for patients receiving FTD/TPI or REG. The index date was the date of first FTD/TPI or REG prescription. Patients were included if: 1) age ≥18 years old, 2) ≥1 CRC diagnosis, 3) no diagnosis of gastric cancer or gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and 4) continuous clinical activity for ≥3 months before and after index date. The observation period spanned from index date to end of data, end of continuous clinical activity, or switch to another mCRC treatment. Adherence was assessed using medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥0.80 and proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥0.80 at 3 months. Compliance was assessed using time to discontinuation over the observation period using allowable gaps of 45, 60, or 90 days. Patients who never discontinued therapy were censored at the end of the observation period. Outcomes were compared between FTD/TPI and REG using multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for demographic and clinical baseline characteristics. Results: A total of 1,630 FTD/TPI patients and 1,425 REG patients were identified. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of FTD/TPI patients was 61.0 ± 11.0 compared to 62.8 ± 10.9 for REG patients (p < 0.001). FTD/TPI patients were 80% more likely to have a MPR ≥0.80 compared to those on REG (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.80, p < 0.001) and more than twice as likely to have a PDC ≥0.80 (OR = 2.66, p < 0.001) at 3 months. FTD/TPI patients were 37% less likely to discontinue their treatment compared to those on REG when using gaps of 60 days (Hazard Ratio = 0.63, p < 0.001). Similar results were found with 45 and 90 days. Conclusions: In this retrospective study of mCRC patients, patients on FTD/TPI were significantly more likely to adhere and comply with therapy compared to those on REG.

Abstract P005: Comparative Effectiveness of Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 133 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Faye L Norby ◽  
Lindsay G Bengtson ◽  
Lin Y Chen ◽  
Richard F MacLehose ◽  
Pamela L Lutsey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Real World ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Gi Bleeding ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
The Us

Background: Rivaroxaban is a novel oral anticoagulant approved in the US in 2011 for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Information on risks and benefits among rivaroxaban users in real-world populations is limited. Methods: We used data from the US MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases between 2010 and 2013. We selected patients with a history of NVAF and initiating rivaroxaban or warfarin. Rivaroxaban users were matched with up to 5 warfarin users by age, sex, database enrollment date and drug initiation date. Ischemic stroke, intracranial bleeding (ICB), myocardial infarction (MI), and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding outcomes were defined by ICD-9-CM codes in an inpatient claim after drug initiation date. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between rivaroxaban vs. warfarin use and outcomes adjusting for age, sex, and CHA2DS2-VASc score. Separate models were used to compare a) new rivaroxaban users with new warfarin users, and b) switchers from warfarin to rivaroxaban to continuous warfarin users. Results: Our analysis included 34,998 rivaroxaban users matched to 102,480 warfarin users with NVAF (39% female, mean age 71), in which 487 ischemic strokes, 179 ICB, 647 MI, and 1353 GI bleeds were identified during a mean follow-up of 9 months. Associations of rivaroxaban vs warfarin were similar in new users and switchers; therefore we pooled both analyses. Rivaroxaban users had lower rates of ICB (hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) = 0.72 (0.46, 1.12))) and ischemic stroke (HR (95% CI) = 0.88 (0.68, 1.13)), but higher rates of GI bleeding (HR (95% CI) = 1.15 (1.01, 1.33)) when compared to warfarin users (table). Conclusion: In this large population-based study of NVAF patients, rivaroxaban users had a non-significant lower risk of ICB and ischemic stroke than warfarin users, but a higher risk of GI bleeding. These real-world findings are comparable to results reported in published clinical trials.

Real-world adherence and treatment discontinuation with trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD-TPI) compared with regorafenib (REG) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15000-e15000
Author(s):  
Anuj K. Patel ◽  
Mei Sheng Duh ◽  
Victoria E. Barghout ◽  
Mihran Ara Yenikomshian ◽  
Yongling Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Real World ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Medication Possession Ratio ◽  
Treatment Discontinuation ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Nationally Representative ◽  
Observation Period

e15000 Background: FTD-TPI and REG both prolong survival in refractory mCRC. Both agents have the benefit of oral administration but with distinct side effect profiles. This study aims to compare real-world treatment patterns following initiation of FTD-TPI or REG for mCRC in a large, nationally representative US claims database. Methods: Retrospective data from 10/2014 to 7/2016 from the US Symphony Health Solutions’ Integrated Dataverse (IDV®) database were analyzed for patients (pts) receiving FTD-TPI or REG. The index date was the date of first FTD-TPI or REG prescription. Pts were included if: 1) age ≥18 years old, 2) ≥1 CRC diagnosis, 3) no diagnosis of gastric cancer or gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and 4) continuous clinical activity for ≥3 months before and after index date. The observation period spanned from index date to end of data, end of continuous clinical activity, or switch to another mCRC treatment. Medication adherence was assessed by medication possession ratio (MPR), with MPR ≥80% as the defined threshold for adherence, as well as by proportion of days covered (PDC) at 3 months. Between treatment groups, binary endpoints were compared using Chi-square tests and mean and median time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) were compared using t-test and Wilcoxon test, respectively. Results: The study population consisted of 1,630 FTD-TPI pts and 1,425 REG pts. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of FTD-TPI pts was 61 ± 11 and REG pts was 63 ± 11 (p < 0.01). Mean ± SD length of observation period in days was 161 ± 59 for FTD-TPI pts and REG pts was 212 ± 113 (p < 0.01). 84% of FTD-TPI and 74% of REG pts reached MPR ≥80% (p < 0.01). FTD-TPI pts had higher mean PDC (71% vs 59%, p < 0.01) than REG pts. Mean and median TTD were significantly longer for FTD-TPI than REG pts (mean: 101 vs. 88 days, p < 0.01; median: 97 vs. 69 days, p < 0.01). Conclusions: In this analysis of real-world medication utilization for mCRC pts, those pts started on FTD-TPI had significantly higher medication adherence and longer TTD than those on REG.

scholarly journals Effectiveness and safety of apixaban versus warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in “real-world” clinical practice

2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (06) ◽  
pp. 1072-1082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Li ◽  
Steve Deitelzweig ◽  
Allison Keshishian ◽  
Melissa Hamilton ◽  
Ruslan Horblyuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Real World ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Haemorrhagic Stroke ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Warfarin Treatment

SummaryThe ARISTOTLE trial showed a risk reduction of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients treated with apixaban compared to warfarin. This retrospective study used four large US claims databases (MarketScan, PharMetrics, Optum, and Humana) of NVAF patients newly initiating apixaban or warfarin from January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2015. After 1:1 warfarin-apixaban propensity score matching (PSM) within each database, the resulting patient records were pooled. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) of stroke/SE and major bleeding (identified using the first listed diagnosis of inpatient claims) within one year of therapy initiation. The study included a total of 76,940 (38,470 warfarin and 38,470 apixaban) patients. Among the 38,470 matched pairs, 14,563 were from MarketScan, 7,683 were from PharMetrics, 7,894 were from Optum, and 8,330 were from Humana. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two cohorts with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 71 (12) years and a mean (SD) CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3.2 (1.7). Apixaban initiators had a significantly lower risk of stroke/SE (HR: 0.67, 95 % CI: 0.59–0.76) and major bleeding (HR: 0.60, 95 % CI: 0.54–0.65) than warfarin initiators. Different types of stroke/SE and major bleeding – including ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, SE, intracranial haemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, and other major bleeding – were all significantly lower for apixaban compared to warfarin treatment. Subgroup analyses (apixaban dosage, age strata, CHA2DS2-VASc or HAS-BLED score strata, or dataset source) all show consistently lower risks of stroke/SE and major bleeding associated with apixaban as compared to warfarin treatment. This is the largest “real-world” study on apixaban effectiveness and safety to date, showing that apixaban initiation was associated with significant risk reductions in stroke/SE and major bleeding compared to warfarin initiation after PSM. These benefits were consistent across various high-risk subgroups and both the standard-and low-dose apixaban dose regimens.Note: The review process for this manuscript was fully handled by Christian Weber, Editor in Chief.Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

Association of circulating tumor cells (CTC) with survival outcomes in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) in a real-world cohort.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 59-59
Author(s):  
Umang Swami ◽  
Taylor Ryan McFarland ◽  
Benjamin Haaland ◽  
Adam Kessel ◽  
Roberto Nussenzveig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Risk Of Progression ◽  
The Relationship

59 Background: In mCSPC, baseline CTC counts have been shown to correlate with PSA responses and progression free survival (PFS) in small studies in the context of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) without modern intensification with docetaxel or novel hormonal therapy. Similar correlation of CTC count with PSA responses and PFS was recently reported from an ongoing phase 3 trial in mCSPC setting (SWOG1216) without reporting the association in the context of ADT intensification. Furthermore, none of these studies correlated CTCs with overall survival (OS). Herein we evaluated whether CTCs were associated with outcomes including OS in a real world mCPSC population treated with intensified as well as non-intensified ADT. Methods: Eligibility criteria: new mCSPC receiving ADT with or without intensification and enumeration of baseline CTCs by FDA cleared Cell Search CTC assay. The relationship between CTC counts (categorized as: 0, 1-4, and ≥5/7.5 ml) and both PFS and OS was assessed in the context of Cox proportional hazards models, both unadjusted and adjusted for age, Gleason, PSA at ADT initiation, de novo vs. non-de novo status, and ADT intensification vs. non-intensification therapy. Results: Overall 99 pts were identified. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table. In unadjusted analyses, CTC counts of ≥5 as compared to 0 were strongly associated with inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.38, 95% CI 1.85-6.18; p < 0.001) and OS (HR 4.44 95% CI 1.63-12.10; p = 0.004). In multivariate analyses, CTC counts of ≥5 as compared to 0 continued to be associated with inferior PFS (HR 5.49, 95% CI 2.64-11.43; p < 0.001) and OS (HR 4.00, 95% CI 1.31-12.23; p = 0.015). Within the ADT intensification subgroup also, high CTC counts were associated with poor PFS and OS. For PFS, the univariate HR for CTC ≥5 vs. 0 was 4.87 (95% CI 1.66-14.30; p = 0.004) and multivariate HR for CTC ≥5 vs. 0 was 7.43 (95% CI 1.92-28.82; p = 0.004). For OS, the univariate HR for CTC ≥5 vs. 0 was 15.88 (95% CI 1.93-130.58; p = 0.010) and multivariate HR for CTC ≥5 vs. 0 was 24.86 (95% CI 2.03-304.45; p = 0.012). Conclusions: To best of our knowledge this is the first study to show that high baseline CTC counts are strongly associated with inferior PFS as well as OS in pts with newly diagnosed mCSPC, even in those who received intensified ADT therapy. Identifying these pts at highest risk of progression and death can help with counselling and prognostication in clinics as well as design and enrollment in future clinical trials. [Table: see text]

The impact of sorafenib on the treatment and survival of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2014.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15682-e15682
Author(s):  
Aman Opneja ◽  
Gino Cioffi ◽  
Asrar Alahmadi ◽  
Nirav Patil ◽  
David Lawrence Bajor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Time Frames ◽  
The Impact

e15682 Background: HCC is a common cause of mortality in the U.S. among men and women (5thand 7th, respectively) with overall five-year survival of ~18%. Sorafenib was the only FDA approved therapy for advanced HCC from 2007 until 2018. This study analyzes trends in the treatment and survival of advanced HCC before and after sorafenib approval. Methods: Adult patients ( > 18 years) with diagnosis of HCC treated with only chemotherapy from 2004 – 2014 were identified in NCDB database. Comparisons were made between 3 time frames: 2004 – 2007 (pre-sorafenib), 2008 – 2011 (early sorafenib) and 2012 – 2014 (late sorafenib). Patients treated with single or multi-agent chemotherapy were analyzed. Cox proportional hazards models were used for univariate and multivariable analyses. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Results: The NCDB contained 33,136 patients with HCC diagnosed between 2004 – 2014 and treated with chemotherapy alone. Patients were generally men (77.4%), over the age of 50 years (92.4%), with an elevated AFP at diagnosis (64.4%), and had limited co-morbidities (76.0%, Charlson/Deyo score of 0-1). The T-stages were T1 (26.3%), T2 (20.5%), T3 (25.6%), and T4 (16.2%). The number and proportion of patients treated with single agent chemotherapy increased significantly during the study period: 2,733 (45.3%) pre-sorafenib, 9,723 (72.7%) early sorafenib, and 13,502 (86.1%) late sorafenib. The proportion of all HCC patients in the NCDB receiving only chemotherapy increased from 17.2% to 26.4% to 28.3% across the 3 time frames. The survival of patients with advanced HCC treated only with chemotherapy improved significantly in the early and late sorafenib cohorts compared to the pre-sorafenib cohort (10.3 months (95% CI: 9.8-10.6) vs. 12.3 months (12.0-12.7) vs. 15.5 months (15.1-15.9), p-value < 0.001). Age > 70 years, male sex, higher Charlson/Deyo score ( > 1), elevated AFP at diagnosis, and higher T-stage were associated with worse survival (p value < 0.001). Conclusions: The approval of sorafenib has dramatically increased the use of chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced HCC and has resulted in a significant survival advantage.

scholarly journals Effects of dose titration on adherence and treatment duration of pregabalin among patients with neuropathic pain: A MarketScan database study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0242467
Author(s):  
Yu-Chen Yeh ◽  
Joseph C. Cappelleri ◽  
Xiaocong L. Marston ◽  
Ahmed Shelbaya
Keyword(s):  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Treatment Adherence ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Medication Possession Ratio ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Continuous Treatment ◽  
Dose Titration ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Physician Awareness

Objective To examine pregabalin dose titration and its impact on treatment adherence and duration in patients with neuropathic pain (NeP). Methods MarketScan database (2009–2014) was used to extract a cohort of incident adult pregabalin users with NeP who had at least 12 months of follow-up data. Any dose augmentation within 45 days following the first pregabalin claim was defined as dose titration. Adherence (measured by medication possession ratio/MPR) and persistence (measured as the duration of continuous treatment) were compared between the cohorts with and without dose titration. Logistic regressions and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify the factors associated with adherence (MPR ≥ 0.8) and predictors of time to discontinuation. Results Among the 5,186 patients in the analysis, only 18% of patients had dose titration. Patients who had dose titration were approximately 2.6 times as likely to be adherent (MPR ≥ 0.8) (odds ratio = 2.59, P < 0.001) than those who did not have dose titration. Kaplan-Meier analysis shows that the time to discontinuation or switch was significantly longer among patients who had dose titration (4.99 vs. 4.04 months, P = 0.009). Conclusions Dose titration was associated with improved treatment adherence and persistence among NeP patients receiving pregabalin. The findings will provide valuable evidence to increase physician awareness of dose recommendations in the prescribing information and to educate patients on the importance of titration and adherence.

Outcomes of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with pazopanib after progression on other targeted therapies (TT): Updated results.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 367-367
Author(s):  
Marc Ryan Matrana ◽  
Cihan Duran ◽  
Aditya Shetty ◽  
Lianchun Xiao ◽  
Bradley J. Atkinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Pancreatic Metastases ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Treatment Naïve

367 Background: Pazopanib is an multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor shown to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) compared to placebo in treatment-naive and cytokine-refractory mRCC. Outcomes and safety on its use after TT are limited. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of consecutive pts with mRCC who were treated with pazopanib between November 2009-November 2011 after having progressive disease (PD) with other TT. Radiographic response was assessed by a blinded radiologist using RECIST v1.1 criteria. PFS and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated by fitting univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the association of PFS with patient co-variates. Results: 112 pts (median age 63 years, 67% male, 83% clear cell) met inclusion criteria. Median number of previous TT was 2 (range 1-5). 85 events (PD or death) occurred. 14 pts (12.5%) had a partial response. Median PFS was 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.3-8.9 months). PFS was significantly associated with male gender (HR=0.55; 95% CI: 0.34-0.87; p=0.011), clear-cell histology (HR=0.42; 95% CI: 0.24-0.74; p=0.0031), number of metastatic sites (HR= 1.26; 95% CI: 1.05-1.52; p=0.0123), pancreatic metastases (HR=0.40; 95% CI: 0.18-0.85;p=0.0185), Karnofsky PS< 80 (HR=2.07; 95% CI: 1.22-3.48; p=0.0062), and elevated LDH (HR=1.63; 95% CI: 1.03-2.573; p=0.035). Median OS was 16.9 months (95% CI: 10.3–21.9). 26% of pts were still receiving pazopanib at the time of analysis. 51% discontinued pazopanib due to PD and 12% died of PD on treatment. 11% discontinued pazopanib due to adverse events (AEs). There were no treatment related deaths. Common AEs included fatigue (43%), increase LFTs (34%), diarrhea (28%), nausea/vomiting (14%), anorexia (14%), hypertension exacerbation (12%), and hypothyroidism (11%). 89% of AEs were grade 1/2. Conclusions: Pazopanib demonstrated meaningful clinical activity in heavily pretreated pts with mRCC following PD with other TT. AEs were mild/moderate and manageable.

Impact of facility type, insurance status, and income on use of single agent chemotherapy (SACT) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (AHCC): Analysis of National Cancer Database (NCDB).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 504-504
Author(s):  
Richard T. Lee ◽  
Gino Cioffi ◽  
Aman Opneja ◽  
Asrar Alahmadi ◽  
Nirav Patil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Integrated Network ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Facility Type ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Time Frames

504 Background: This study analyzes the pattern of use of SACT in the treatment and survival of AHCC before and after sorafenib was FDA approved in late 2007. Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with HCC and treated with only chemotherapy (CT) from 2004 – 2014 were identified in NCDB database. Patients were analyzed during 3 time frames: 2004–2006 (pre-sorafenib (PS), 2007–2011 (early sorafenib (ES) and 2012–2014 (late sorafenib (LS)). Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier method were used for analyses. Results: The NCDB contained 31,107 patients with HCC diagnosed from 2004–2014 and treated with CT alone. Patients were generally men (77.3%), >50 years of age (92.5%), and with a variety of T-stages - T1 (31.0%), T2 (23.9%), T3 (28.3%), and T4 (16.9%). The use of SACT was only 6.2% in the PS period, increased to 15.5% in the ES period, and to 22.3% in the LS period (p<0.0001). During this later period, the highest proportion of SACT is among academic and integrated network facilities (23.4%) as compared to community facilities (16.4%, p<0.0001). The MS of patients with AHCC treated only with CT has improved significantly over the study periods from 10 months (m) (95% CI: 9.5-10.6) to 12.5m (12.0-12.9) to 16m (15.6-16.4, p< 0.001). Significant differences in MS were found between facility types in all time frames (Table). Multivariate analysis indicates worse outcomes for patients treated at community cancer programs (HR 1.66, 1.53-1.79) as compared to academic programs as well as for no insurance (HR 1.13, 1.05-1.22) and estimated household income of <$63,000 (HR 1.09, 1.05-1.13). Conclusions: Despite an overall improvement in survival for AHCC patients treated with only CT, significant differences in the utilization of SACT and survival exist by facility type, insurance status, and income. [Table: see text]

Abstract 20218: Comparative Effectiveness of Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay Bengtson ◽  
Lin Chen ◽  
Richard MacLehose ◽  
Pamela Lutsey ◽  
Alvaro Alonso
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Real World ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Intracranial Bleeding ◽  
Gi Bleeding ◽  
Pharmacy Claims ◽  
The Us

Background: In randomized trials, the new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) dabigatran and rivaroxaban have been at least as efficacious as warfarin in the prevention of ischemic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Information on the effectiveness of NOACs versus warfarin in real-world populations in the US is more limited. Methods: We used data from the US MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases in the period 2010-12. We selected patients initiating oral anticoagulants after NVAF diagnosis, and with at least 6 months of enrollment before first anticoagulant use. Patients initiating dabigatran or rivaroxaban were matched with up to 5 warfarin users by age, sex, and time in the database. Outcomes of interest (ischemic stroke, intracranial bleeding, and gastrointestinal [GI] bleeding) were defined according to validated algorithms. Information on other comorbidities and medication use was obtained from inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy claims. High-dimensional propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the association of NOACs vs warfarin with each outcome of interest. Results: The analysis included 32,918 dabigatran, 3,301 rivaroxaban and 92,633 warfarin users with NVAF. During an average 13-month follow-up (6 for rivaroxaban, 15 for dabigatran), 1035 ischemic strokes, 225 intracranial bleeds, and 1842 GI bleeds were identified. Rate of ischemic stroke was similar in patients initiating NOACs compared to those on warfarin. However, rate of intracranial bleeding was lower in patients using NOACs compared to warfarin users, while GI bleeding rate was higher in dabigatran users than warfarin users (Table). Conclusion: In this large real-world patient population, effectiveness of NOACs (compared to warfarin) for diverse outcomes was comparable to efficacy reported in the RE-LY and ROCKET-AF trials.

scholarly journals Association between the psoas muscle index and hospitalization for pneumonia in patients undergoing hemodialysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosei Yamaguchi ◽  
Mineaki Kitamura ◽  
Takahiro Takazono ◽  
Shuntaro Sato ◽  
Kazuko Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Muscle Mass ◽  
Skeletal Muscle Mass ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Psoas Muscle ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Dialysis Vintage ◽  
Observation Period

Abstract Background Although muscle mass loss and pneumonia are common and crucial issues in hemodialysis (HD) patients, few reports have focused on their association, which remains unclear. This study assessed the association between skeletal muscle mass and the incidence of pneumonia in HD patients using the psoas muscle index (PMI). Methods This retrospective study included 330 patients on HD who were treated at a single center between July 2011 and June 2012. The observation period was between July 2011 and June 2021. Demographic, clinical, and HD data were collected, and the associations between PMI and hospitalization due to bacterial pneumonia were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for patients’ background data. Additionally, the correlation between patient characteristics and PMI was evaluated using multivariable linear regression. Results Among 330 patients (mean age, 67.3 ± 13.3; 56.7% male; median dialysis vintage 58 months, (interquartile range [IQR] 23–124), 79 were hospitalized for pneumonia during the observation period (median observation period was 4.5 years [IQR 2.0–9.1]). The multivariable Cox proportional analysis, which was adjusted for age, sex, dialysis vintage, diabetes mellitus, and stroke history and considered death as a competing risk, indicated that decreased PMI/(standard deviation) was closely associated with the development of pneumonia (hazard ratio: 0.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.47–0.95, p = 0.03). Conclusions Skeletal muscle mass was associated with the development of pneumonia in patients on HD and could be a useful marker for the risk of pneumonia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document