Combined use of two monoclonal antibodies in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis and cardiac involvement.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8009-8009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amandeep Godara ◽  
Nauman Saleem Siddiqui ◽  
Lisa Lee ◽  
Denis Toskic ◽  
Teresa Fogaren ◽  
...  

8009 Background: Systemic AL amyloidosis (AL) is a rare disease in which circulating immunoglobulin light chains misfold, are directly toxic to key organs and also cause organ failure by mass effect. Patients with cardiac involvement have a poor prognosis; 25% of them die within 6 months of diagnosis. Depth of hematologic and organ response has prognostic significance and as new therapies become available, combining targeted therapies might hold the key to improve survival and deepen responses. Methods: We report the outcomes of 9 patients with AL amyloidosis who simultaneously received dual monoclonal antibody therapy with daratumumab and the investigational anti-fibril antibody NEOD001 at our institution. We also provide a descriptive comparison of 10 other AL amyloidosis patients who received treatment with daratumumab alone. Results: Of these 9 patients, there were 4 men/5 women with a median age of 68 years (range, 52-75) and a median of 261 days from diagnosis (range, 51-2037). Median NT-proBNP was 3807 pg/ml (range, 1326-13193). These 9 patients did not respond to initial therapy with a bortezomib-based regimen. Infusions of both monoclonals were separated by 2 days and were well tolerated without any unexpected toxicity. 88% of patients achieved ≥VGPR with daratumumab+NEOD001 in a median of 33 days and cardiac responses were achieved in < 90 days. In contrast, patients receiving daratumumab alone (n=10) achieved hematologic and cardiac responses at later times (Table). Conclusions: In conclusion, dual monoclonal antibodies targeting different epitopes can be safely combined in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis. Although this report features a small number of patients, high rates of hematologic and cardiac responses achieved suggest that this combination should be studied further, possibly in a prospective randomized trial. [Table: see text]

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1867-1867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veerpal Singh ◽  
Ayman Saad ◽  
Jeanne Palmer ◽  
Jasleen K Randhawa ◽  
Parameswaran N. Hari

Abstract Abstract 1867 Poster Board I-892 Bortezomib has been shown to have significant activity in the suppression of light chain production and induction of responses in patients with relapsed refractory AL Amyloidosis. We analyzed the outcomes of 16 (9 male) newly diagnosed biopsy proven AL Amyloidosis patients treated with Bortezomib based regimens at our institution. All patients received initial therapy with Bortezomib and dexamethasone (dex). Patients with a Karnofsky performance score ( KPS) >70 received Bortezomib at starting doses of 1.3 mg/m2 along with dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1,4,8, 11 ( with a 10 day rest period). Patients with a lower KPS received Bortezomib/Dex on a weekly schedule as tolerated. Dose adjustments were made based on side effects such as neuropathy, hypotension, GI disturbances or electrolyte imbalances. Patients tolerating Bortezomib/dex with improvement in KPS had cyclophosphamide (4) or lenalidomide (1) added to their initial therapy. Patients: Median age was 64 years (39–88). Nine had kappa light chain involvement. Organ involvement was renal (73%), cardiac (63%), hepatic (25%), tongue or soft tissue (20%), GI (30%). Median KPS was 70 (50 –100). Ten of the 16 patients were treated as in-patients due to multi-organ dysfunction. Five patients required hemodialysis within a month of diagnosis. Cardiac involvement was stage 3 (Mayo risk group) in 25%. Three patients were unevaluable: 2 dying before 2 cycles and 1 discontinued therapy (Grade 3 liver dysfunction). Median follow up was 5 months (range 2–33 mo). Results: Evaluable (receiving at least 2 cycles) patients have all had a free light chain response. The overall hematological response rate was 100% with 55% partial remission (PR) and 45% complete remission (CR). Median cycles to achievement of a light chain response was 2 (range 1–4). Four patients underwent autologous stem cell transplantation with no mortality. Five (40%) of the responders have had an organ response (3 renal, 1 macroglossia, 1 cardiac) with only patients alive for >5 months having any evidence of organ response. Five (40%) of the evaluable patients have died with progressive cardiac involvement (2), relapsed disease (2) or renal failure (1) with refusal of dialysis. In patients receiving at least one dose of bortezomib, non-hematologic toxicity (>grade 2) included -neuropathy (20%), hypotension (20%), severe diarrhea (12%), sepsis (12%), paralytic ileus (6%), liver dysfunction (6%), sudden death (6%). Conclusions: Bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone has a high response rate in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. This regimen was well tolerated in a cohort of severe, multisystem amyloidosis patients with low treatment related mortality. Light chain responses were fast whereas organ responses were not seen prior to 5 months of therapy. The regimen also served as a platform for further intensification with the addition of lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide or autologous transplant in responders. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Bortezomib for the therapy of amyloidosis. Hari:Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2135-2135
Author(s):  
Joan Blade ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Juan José Lahuerta ◽  
Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽  
Javier de la Rubia ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Treatment with oral melphalan and dexamethasone has been adopted as the standard of care for newly diagnosed patients with immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis not eligible for high-dose melphalan and stem cell transplantation (HDM/SCT). However, new treatment options are still needed for this patient population. Aim: Based on the activity of IMiDs® immunomodulatory drugs in relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis, we designed a multicenter prospective, phase II trial with lenalidomide, dexamethasone and cyclophosphamide for newly diagnosed patients not eligible for autologous transplant. Patients and methods: The main inclusion criteria were newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis confirmed by biopsy, significant organ involvement, cardiac ejection fraction over 50%, serum creatinine below 3 mg/dL, and not being eligible for autologous transplant. Treatment schedule consisted of 6 cycles of lenalidomide at 15 mg orally (po) on days 1 to 21, dexamethasone at 20 mg po on days 1 to 4 and 9 to 12, and cyclophosphamide at 300 mg/m2 intravenously (iv) on days 1 and 8 every 28 days, followed by 6 more cycles of lenalidomide at the same dose, dexamethasone at 20 mg po on days 1 to 4 and cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 iv on day 1. After these 12 cycles, maintenance with lenalidomide (10 mg po on days 1 to 21) and dexamethasone (20 mg po on days 1 to 4) was planned for three additional years or until discontinuation due to intolerance or disease progression. All patients received prophylaxis of thromboembolic events with oral aspirin (100 mg po daily) or subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin. The primary endpoint was hematologic response. Diagnosis of AL amyloidosis, definition of organ involvement and response criteria followed the Consensus Opinion from the Xth International Symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis (Gertz et al, Am J Hematol 2005), adding the very good partial response category included in the recently reported criteria (Palladini et al, J Clin Oncol 2012). Assessments of response were performed at the beginning of each cycle during the treatment period and every 3 months during the maintenance phase. Results: From September 2010 to December 2012, 28 patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty-three patients had cardiac involvement, with cardiac stage 3 in 14 of them. The overall hematologic response rate was 46%, including 7 patients (25%) with complete response, 5 patients (18%) with very good partial response and 1 patient (3%) with partial response. The organ response rate was 46% and was only observed among patients who achieved hematologic response. The organ response was reached in 10 (43%) of the 23 patients with renal involvement and 6 (26%) of the 23 patients with cardiac involvement. In 4 patients lenalidomide was reduced or discontinued due to toxicity. A therapy-related serious adverse event was reported in 6 patients. No significant cytopenias and no second primary malignancies (SPM) were observed. So far, 11 patients remain on the study. Seventeen (60%) have been discontinued mostly due to death secondary to cardiac or renal AL-related late events (8 patients), progression or lack of response (4), and toxicity (3). After a median follow up of 24 months, the median PFS and OS have not been reached, being significantly longer in responders. The estimated probability of PFS and OS for responders was 92% at 34 months. In contrast, the median PFS and OS for non-responders were only 1.9 and 2.4 months, respectively. Finally, according to Mayo Clinic risk stratification based on cardiac biomarkers, median OS for patients with stage I-II has not been reached (the 2-year estimate was 100%), and was 2.2 months for stage III (p <0.001; Figure 1). Conclusions: Our results support the efficacy and safety of the combination lenalidomide, dexamethasone and cyclophosphamide as a new treatment option for patients with AL amyloidosis not eligible for ASCT, without the risk of neuropathy associated with bortezomib-based therapies. However, this regimen should be preferably used when the organ function is still preserved since patients with advanced stage disease, particularly those with severe cardiac involvement, are unlikely to benefit. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Blade: Janssen, Celgene and Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide. First-line therapy in combination for AL amyloidosis.. Oriol:Janssen and Celgene: Honoraria. Lahuerta:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Mateos:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. de la Rubia:Janssen and Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fernandez de Larrea:Janssen and Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. San Miguel:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cibeira:Janssen and Celgene: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3048-3048
Author(s):  
Efstathios Kastritis ◽  
Maria Roussou ◽  
Magdalini Migkou ◽  
Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽  
Constantinos Pamboukas ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3048 Until recently, patients with AL amyloidosis had limited treatment options, especially those who were not candidates for high dose therapy, those with severe cardiac involvement or patients who relapsed after initial treatment or never responded to first line alkylators with steroids. Bortezomib (B) with dexamethasone (D) has shown significant activity in patients with AL amyloidosis in patients who relapsed or even those who were refractory to initial treatment. We and others have presented data indicating that BD is active in newly diagnosed patients with AL, inducing responses rapidly but also associated with high rates of complete responses. However, data about long-term follow-up of these patients are limited. Thus, we updated a series of 24, previously untreated patients who received frontline BD. In all patients, treatment started with B at a dose of 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8 & 11 and D was given for 4 consecutive days at a dose of 40 mg per day (days 1–4), every 21 days for up to 6 cycles. The median age of these patients was 70 years (range 42–82) and 46% were males. The median number of involved organs was 2; heart was involved in 83% and kidneys in 63%. Fifty-seven percent were Mayo stage II and 26% were Mayo stage III while 67% had impaired ECOG performance status ≥ 2. The first patient started treatment with BD on September 2005. A median of 5 cycles of BD was given (range 1–6) and 57% of patients received the planned 6 cycles. On intent to treat and according to criteria published by Gertz et al in 2005, 77% of patients achieved a hematologic response including 36% with a hematologic CR. Most of the responses occurred after the first cycle of BD (median time to first response <1 month), while a median of two cycles of BD was needed for CR (median time to CR was 42 days, range 21–84). In 54% of patients an organ response was recorded: 47% of patients with a cardiac involvement achieved a cardiac response and 77% had a reduction of NTproBNP ≥ 30% (which was at least 300 pg/ml), while 60% of patients with a kidney involvement achieved an organ response. Three patients received high dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplant (HDM-ASCT) after they had completed 6 cycles of BD, 2 while in CR and one in PR. All these 3 patients had achieved organ responses before ASCT. The median follow up for all patients is 31 months. Thirteen patients (54%) have died; most of them due to complications of cardiac amyloidosis and the median survival is estimated to exceed 36 months (patients who underwent ASCT were censored at the time of HDM). Baseline NT-proBNP was the most significant factor independently associated with survival. There were no differences in the baseline characteristics of patients who achieved CR compared to those who achieved a PR as best hematologic response. The median follow up for patients who achieved a CR is 31 months (range 2–55 months). One patient died early due to complications of cardiac amyloidosis, while she had achieved a CR. Among the rest of the patients who achieved a CR but did not receive HDM, all remain alive and without progression for a median of 32 months. Similarly none of the patients who received HDM has relapsed. Among patients who achieved a PR as their best response, 4 (50%) have relapsed and the median progression free survival (PFS) for these patients is 9 months and their median survival is 34 months. In conclusion, BD induces high rates of CRs, in unselected, patients with previously untreated AL amyloidosis, most of whom had features of advanced disease and elevated cardiobiomarkers. i.e. patients that may be excluded form clinical trials. The severity of cardiac involvement remains the most important prognostic factor despite the rapid responses and the high rates of hematologic CRs. It is also of interest to note that CRs may persist even in patients who did not receive any alkylating agents or consolidation with high dose melphalan. A CR is associated with improved survival and should be the primary goal of treatment in patients with AL. Our data indicate that primary treatment with bortezomib based regimens should be evaluated in a phase III trial. Disclosures: Dimopoulos: Ortho-Biotech: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4525-4525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Kaufman ◽  
Ronald Witteles ◽  
Matthew Wheeler ◽  
Patricia Ulloa ◽  
Marie Lugtu ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: In immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis, cardiac involvement is the primary cause of premature death. Light chain suppression, with therapies targeting the underlying plasma cell clone producing amyloidogenic free light chains, has been difficult to achieve in a relapsed/refractory disease setting. Hematologic response is required to obtain a cardiac organ response, which is predictive of survival and is an important, if not primary, therapeutic goal. We have previously reported rapid and favorable hematologic response rates with the monoclonal anti-CD38 antibody daratumumab in a cohort of heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory AL patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate cardiac organ response following light chain suppressive therapy with daratumumab in patients with relapsed/refractory AL. Materials & Methods:Consecutive patients with biopsy-proven AL and cardiac involvement, followed at the Stanford University Amyloid Center, who received daratumumab were retrospectively evaluated for hematologic and cardiac organ response. In accordance with IRB approval, demographic and clinical information was obtained from medical records. Hematologic and cardiac organ response criteria were defined per consensus guidelines in AL (Comenzo et al, Leukemia 2012). Results: Twelve patients with previously treated AL with cardiac involvement received a median of 12 doses (range 5-18) of single agent daratumumab. The antibody was given intravenously at 16 mg/kg weekly for 8 weeks, followed by every other week infusion for 8 doses and then monthly infusions. The median patient age was 67 and 75% of patients were male. The median number of lines of prior therapy was 3; notably, none of the patients had previously achieved a hematologic complete response to prior therapy including high dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplant in 2 patients. Ten of 12 patients (83%) achieved a partial hematologic response or better with daratumumab (3 complete responses (25%), 3 very good partial responses (25%), and 4 partial responses (33%)). Median NT-pro BNP was 2516 pg/mL prior to daratumumab therapy. Of all 12 treated patients, seven patients were evaluable for cardiac response based on baseline NT-proBNP >650 ng/L. Of these, 3 patients achieved a cardiac organ response by NT-pro BNP criteria (>30% reduction and >300 ng/l decrease). Two patients had cardiac progression by NT-pro BNP criteria (no echocardiographic progression was observed) despite hematologic response with one patient discontinuing therapy to pursue hospice care. Infusion reactions were observed in 8/12 patients with only 1 grade 3 infusion reaction. Conclusions: Daratumumab yielded rapid and significant hematologic responses in our retrospective single institution cohort of heavily pretreated AL patients. At a median daratumumab duration of therapy of only 4 months, evidence of cardiac organ improvement was observed. Daratumumab represents a well tolerated and exceptionally promising new treatment for patients with AL amyloidosis; larger prospective trials to evaluate this agent are warranted. Disclosures Liedtke: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 405-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Efstathios Kastritis ◽  
Ioannis Papassotiriou ◽  
Evangelos Terpos ◽  
Maria Roussou ◽  
Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽  
...  

Key Points Serum levels of VWF antigen are elevated in AL amyloidosis, reflecting endothelial dysfunction. High VWF levels predict for poor outcome in patients with cardiac involvement and discriminate high-risk patients even within stage IIIB.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 184-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amandeep Godara ◽  
Nauman Saleem Siddiqui ◽  
Lisa X. Lee ◽  
Denis Toskic ◽  
Teresa Fogaren ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 865-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Ute Hegenbart ◽  
Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽  
Giampaolo Merlini ◽  
Giovanni Palladini ◽  
...  

AbstractThis first prospective phase 2 study of single-agent bortezomib in relapsed primary systemic AL amyloidosis evaluated the recommended (maximum planned) doses identified in phase 1 testing (1.6 mg/m2 once weekly [days 1, 8, 15, and 22; 35-day cycles]; 1.3 mg/m2 twice weekly [days 1, 4, 8, and 11; 21-day cycles]). Among all 70 patients enrolled in the study, 44% had ≥ 3 organs involved, including 73% and 56% with renal and cardiac involvement. In the 1.6 mg/m2 once-weekly and 1.3 mg/m2 twice-weekly groups, the hematologic response rate was 68.8% and 66.7% (37.5% and 24.2% complete responses, respectively); median time to first/best response was 2.1/3.2 and 0.7/1.2 months, and 78.8% and 75.5% had response durations of ≥ 1 year, respectively. One-year hematologic progression-free rates were 72.2% and 74.6%, and 1-year survival rates were 93.8% and 84.0%, respectively. Outcomes appeared similar in patients with cardiac involvement. Among all 70 patients, organ responses included 29% renal and 13% cardiac responses. Rates of grade ≥ 3 toxicities (79% vs 50%) and discontinuations/dose reductions (38%/53% vs 28%/22%) resulting from toxicities appeared higher with 1.3 mg/m2 twice-weekly versus 1.6 mg/m2 once-weekly dosing. Both bortezomib dose schedules represent active, well-tolerated regimens in relapsed AL amyloidosis. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00298766.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4064-4064
Author(s):  
Victor H Jimenez-Zepeda ◽  
Donna Reece ◽  
Suzanne Trudel ◽  
Christine I. Chen ◽  
Rodger E. Tiedemann ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4064 The spectrum and severity of organ involvement, especially cardiac involvement, usually dictate early outcome, with cardiac biomarkers such as cTnT, NT-ProBNP, and serum uric acid; median survival is only 5.8 months in patients (pts) with high-stage cardiac biomarkers. Since novel therapies have been now been tried in AL amyloidosis, we performed a retrospective review of two different treatment approaches to explore whether the more rapid hematological (HR) that can result from novel therapy produces improved cardiac responses (CardR) and organ responsse (OR) and translates into a greater benefit for pts with poor cardiac reserve. Methods: Pts with documented symptomatic AL with cardiac involvement based on functional studies and/or serum biomarkers who received treatment with bortezomib–containing (Bor) regimens or melphalan and dexamethasone (MD) were identified from our institutional amyloidosis database. TnI and BNP values at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months were recorded. HR, CardR and OR were assessed according to the more recent validation of the criteria response (Leukemia, 2012). Results: Thirty-eight pts meeting inclusion criteria were identified, with 25 pts treated with Bor and 13 pts treated with MD from 12/2005 to 10/2011. Clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Bor was given as upfront therapy in 9 pts, as second-line in 13 pts and third-line in 3. After a median of 7 cycles of Bor regimens (1–56) and 6 cycles of MD (1–9), a HR was seen in 23 cases (92%) and 13 cases (100%), including: CR in 32% and 31%, VGPR in 56% and 54% and PR in 4% and 15%, respectively, (p=0.491). Pts treated with Bor achieved HR at a median of 6 weeks compared to 10 weeks for MD (p=0.001); 16 patients treated with Bor had already achieved ≥PR at 6 weeks. OR at 6 months was documented in 20 cases treated with Bor (80%) and 3 cases with MD (23%). With respect to cardiac response, a ≥50% decrease of Troponin-I was seen in 9 of 13 and 4 of 11 evaluable patients treated with Bor and MD respectively, while a decrease of BNP of ≥50% was observed in 11 of 13 evaluable cases treated with Bor and 10 of 13 treated with MD at a median of 6 and 5 months in the Bor group and 12 and 12 months in the MD group, respectively (p=0.001). In the Bor group, 23 patients remained progression-free, versus 7 patients in the MD group (p=0.01). In conclusion, Bor is a safe and well-tolerated therapy for AL patients and shows faster HR and cardiac responses assessed by BNP and TnI than MD. Although this retrospective study has the limitations of selection bias, small numbers, variable entry criteria, and slight differences in treatment regimen, we show that the overall HR and OR rates are similar with both Bor and MD regimens but, importantly, the rapidity of response is better with bortezomib therapy. This is meaningful for patients with poor cardiac reserve in whom a fast response is needed to avoid cardiac complications/early death. Further prospective comparative studies are required with a focus on longer-term outcomes such as overall survival. Disclosures: Jimenez-Zepeda: MMRF: Research Funding; Janssen Ortho: Honoraria. Reece:Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millinneum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Chen:Roche: Honoraria; Johnson & Johnson, Lundbeck, Celgene: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Tiedemann:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Kukreti:Roche: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2025-2025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Aadil Rahman ◽  
Ali Younas Khan ◽  
Awais Ijaz ◽  
Muhammad Junaid Tariq ◽  
Muhammad Usman ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a low burden plasma cell disorder, characterized by deposition of misfolded lambda or kappa light chains. Kidney dysfunction is present in almost two-thirds of patients at the time of initial presentation, followed by diastolic heart failure in about 50% of cases, which is responsible for 75% of deaths in these patients. Autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT) remains the gold standard for the management of AL amyloidosis but is often impractical to perform by virtue of patients' age, medical comorbidities including cardiac involvement. Methods We conducted a literature search using three databases (PubMed, Embase,Web of Science). Our search strategy included MeSH terms and key words such as AL amyloidosis, daratumumab and darzalex from date of inception to March 2018. After excluding duplicates, reviews and non-relevant articles, we selected eight studies, including two case reports, two phase II prospective trials and four retrospective trials. Results Data on 129 patients was included, there ages ranged from 43-83 years. Median number of prior therapies were 3 (range: 2-6), 106 (82%) received proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib) based therapy, and 69 (53.5%) received immunomodulatory (lenalidomide) based therapy. Another 41 (32%) received high dose melphalan (HDM) followed by auto-SCT. The time from the diagnosis of AL to the start of daratumumab therapy varied from 0.7-150 months. Eighty-nine (69%) patients had cardiac and 64 (49.6%) patients had renal involvement. A total of 114 (88%) patients received a daratumumab dose of 16 mg/kg weekly for 8 weeks followed by every 2 weeks for the next 8 weeks. A total of 104 patients were evaluable for hematological response, assessed by improvement in free light chain (FLC) levels. Daratumamab achieved an impressive overall response rate (ORR) of 72% (n=75). Complete remission (CR) in 15 (14%) of patients, very good partial response (VGPR) in 44 (42%) and a partial response (PR) in 16 (15%) of patients was noted. Thirty-four patients with cardiac involvement and 26 patients with renal amyloidosis were assessed for organ response across four studies. Thirteen (38%) patients with cardiac amyloidosis demonstrated an improvement in N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. Ten (38%) patients with renal involvement responded according to consensus criteria [Palladini et al 2014] for organ response. Another two had improvement in serum creatinine levels. Among the 129 patients treated with daratumumab for AL amyloidosis, 36 (32%) reported infusion related reactions (IRR). Most were mild (grade 1-2). Daratumumab infusion was well tolerated in patients with cardiac (n=54) and renal involvement (n=48). Only one patient needed adjustment in his diuretic dose, another one developed decompensated heart failure and one died due to progression of cardiac disease. Seven patients had worsening of their NT-proBNP levels. Similarly, no dose adjustments were required for patients with renal amyloidosis and one patient tolerated daratumumab infusion at a GFR<20 mL/min without any complications. Conclusion Daratumumab monotherapy is associated with deep and prompt hematological responses in patients with heavily pretreated AL amyloidosis, at the standard dosing regimens used for multiple myeloma, with a favorable safety profile. Furthermore, daratumumab performed well in patients with cardiac amyloidosis even though there is an increased risk of volume overload and infusion related morbidity. Given the high incidence of peripheral neuropathy with bortezomib, cardiotoxicity with carfilzomib based regimens in amyloidosis patients, daratumumab appears to be a suitable alternative. It has already been approved for relapsed amyloidosis (AL) patients in the European Union. Currently, it is being investigated as monotherapy for AL amyloidosis in phase 2 trials (NCT02841033 and NCT02816476) and in combination with bortezomib, cytoxin and dexamethasone (VCd) in a phase III trial (NCT03201965). Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 44-45
Author(s):  
Monique C. Minnema ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Giampaolo Merlini ◽  
Raymond L. Comenzo ◽  
Efstathios Kastritis ◽  
...  

Background: The extent of cardiac involvement has a major impact on clinical outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed light chain (AL) amyloidosis. Here, we present the hematologic responses, major organ deterioration progression-free survival (MOD-PFS) and event-free survival (MOD-EFS), and organ responses by cardiac stage in patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis treated with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (VCd) with or without daratumumab subcutaneous (DARA SC) in the ANDROMEDA trial (NCT03201965). Methods: Key eligibility criteria included newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis with measurable hematologic disease, ≥1 involved organ, cardiac stage I-IIIA (based on the European Modification of the Mayo staging system), eGFR ≥20 mL/min, and absence of symptomatic multiple myeloma. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive DARA-VCd or VCd alone. All patients received bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 SC weekly), cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2 oral [PO] or intravenous [IV] weekly [500 mg maximum]), and dexamethasone (20-40 mg PO or IV weekly) for six 28-day cycles. DARA SC (1800 mg, co-formulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 in 15 mL) was administered by injection weekly in Cycles 1-2, every 2 weeks in Cycles 3-6, and every 4 weeks thereafter for up to 24 cycles. Disease evaluations occurred every 4 weeks (Cycles 1-6) and every 8 weeks (after Cycle 7) until major organ deterioration, hematologic progression, death, end of study, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was overall (ie, at any time) hematologic complete response (CR) rate. Secondary endpoints included MOD-PFS, MOD-EFS, organ response rate, time to hematologic response, survival, and safety. Analyses of hematologic CR and MOD-PFS were performed on the intent-to-treat analysis set; cardiac response analyses were based on patients who were evaluable for cardiac response, defined as patients with baseline NT-ProNBP value ≥650 ng/L or baseline NYHA class 3 or 4 and received at least 1 administration of study treatment. Patients without a baseline assessment or post-baseline assessment were censored at randomization for the MOD-PFS analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize overall CR rate and organ response rate. Hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were estimated based on Cox proportional hazard model. Results: A total of 388 patients were randomized to receive DARA-VCd (n=195) or VCd alone (n=193). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between treatment groups. The median age was 64 years and the proportions of patients with cardiac stage I, II, and III were 23%, 40%, and 37%, respectively. The median duration of treatment was 9.6 months for DARA-VCd and 5.3 months for VCd. Median follow-up was 11.4 months (range, 0.03-21.3+). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced across cardiac stages, except increasing cardiac stage was associated with older age (≥65 years), worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, more advanced renal failure (CrCl ≤30), and functionally worse heart failure (NYHA IIIA). Hematologic CR rates were higher in the DARA-VCd group than in the VCd group in patients with cardiac stages I, II, and III at baseline (Table). Cardiac and renal response rates at 6 months were also higher in the DARA-VCd group regardless of cardiac stage at baseline (Table). The hazard ratios (HRs) for MOD-PFS were 0.33, 0.55 and 0.66 for cardiac stages I, II and III, respectively, favoring DARA-VCd. Corresponding HRs for MOD-EFS were 0.24, 0.39, and 0.48, respectively. Rates of any grade adverse events (AEs) were similar in patients with and without cardiac involvement at baseline. Across both treatment arms, rates of serious treatment-emergent AEs were higher in patients with cardiac involvement at baseline than in those without. Conclusions: The benefit of DARA-VCd was retained over VCd alone across cardiac stages for hematologic CR, MOD-PFS, MOD-EFS, and organ responses. Disclosures Minnema: Kite, a Gilead Company: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other: travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy. Dispenzieri:Alnylam: Research Funding; Intellia: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Comenzo:Unum: Consultancy; Prothena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Caleum: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kastritis:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Wechalekar:Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory; Caelum: Other: Advisory. Witteles:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maurer:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alnylam: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ionis: Research Funding; Eidos: Research Funding; Akcea: Research Funding. Tran:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Qin:Janssen: Current Employment. Vasey:Janssen Research & Development: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Tromp:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Weiss:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Vermeulen:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Jaccard:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: A.J. has served in a consulting or advisory role for Janssen and has received honoraria from, received research funding from, and had travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid for or reimbursed by Janssen., Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: A.J. has served in a consulting or advisory role for Janssen and has received honoraria from, received research funding from, and had travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid for or reimbursed by Celgene., Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document