Real-world outcomes with immuno-oncology (IO) therapies: A prospective, observational cohort study in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (OPTIMIzE).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14144-e14144
Author(s):  
John M. Kirkwood ◽  
Lisa A. Kottschade ◽  
Robert R. McWilliams ◽  
Nikhil I. Khushalani ◽  
Sekwon Jang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Grade 3

e14144 Background: There is little real-world evidence evaluating treatment patterns and outcomes with IO therapies for pts with advanced melanoma (aMEL). We present results from the OPTIMIzE (NCT02780089) study in pts with aMEL receiving IO therapies. Methods: OPTIMIzE is a US-based multisite (150 sites), community-based study of adult pts with aMEL. Pts receiving first-line (1L) nivolumab (NIVO)+ipilimumab (IPI), anti-PD-1 (NIVO/pembrolizumab), or IPI between 2011-2018 with a minimum 1 y of follow-up were included. Baseline characteristics, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and quality of life (QoL) were analyzed. QoL assessments included the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Melanoma (FACT-M), EQ-5D index, and visual analog scale (VAS). Results: Cohort size: 81 NIVO+IPI, 147 anti-PD-1, and 16 IPI (IPI arm not included in the analysis). Overall, mean age was 64.5 y; 42% had BRAF mutation. Mean follow-up was 14.1 mo. Pts in the NIVO+IPI group were younger, had better ECOG performance status, and a higher likelihood of M1c disease and elevated LDH vs the anti-PD-1 group. ORR was higher for pts treated with NIVO+IPI vs anti-PD-1 (48% vs 33%, P= 0.08). Unadjusted 1-y OS was 78.4% for NIVO+IPI and 73.1% for anti-PD-1. In multivariate Cox model analysis, the hazard ratio for OS for NIVO+IPI vs anti-PD-1 was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.46–1.33; P= 0.36). Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 53% and 22% of pts in the NIVO+IPI and anti-PD-1 groups, respectively ( P˂0.001). QoL changes from baseline were clinically meaningful for EQ-5D VAS and FACT-M in the NIVO+IPI group at 12 mo (Table). After adjusting for baseline covariates, the difference at 12 mo between NIVO+IPI vs anti-PD-1 was 6.7 ( P= 0.04) for EQ-5D VAS and 8.8 ( P= 0.02) for FACT-M. Conclusions: Safety and efficacy outcomes from this prospective real-world study are consistent with those reported in prior clinical trials in treatment-naive aMEL pts. No clinically meaningful deterioration in QoL measures was observed in either group. Clinical trial information: NCT02780089. [Table: see text]

First-line nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) plus two cycles of chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo alone (4 cycles) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Two-year update from CheckMate 9LA.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9000-9000
Author(s):  
Martin Reck ◽  
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu ◽  
Manuel Cobo ◽  
Michael Schenker ◽  
Bogdan Zurawski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

9000 Background: In the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 9LA trial (NCT03215706), first-line NIVO + IPI combined with 2 cycles of chemo significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) vs chemo alone (4 cycles). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level and histology. Here we report data with 2 years’ minimum follow-up from this study. Methods: Adult patients (pts) with stage IV / recurrent NSCLC, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, and no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were stratified by PD-L1 (< 1% vs ≥ 1%), sex, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 360 mg Q3W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W + chemo (2 cycles; n = 361) or chemo alone (4 cycles; n = 358). Pts with non-squamous NSCLC in the chemo-alone arm could receive pemetrexed maintenance. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included PFS and ORR by blinded independent central review, and efficacy by different PD-L1 levels. Safety was exploratory. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 24.4 months for OS (database lock: Feb 18, 2021), pts treated with NIVO + IPI + chemo continued to derive OS benefit vs chemo, with a median OS of 15.8 months vs 11.0 months, respectively (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.61–0.86]); 2-year OS rates were 38% vs 26%. Median PFS with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was 6.7 months vs 5.3 months (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56–0.79]); 8% and 37% of pts who had disease progression received subsequent immunotherapy, respectively. ORR was 38% with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs 25% with chemo. Similar clinical benefit with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was observed in all randomized pts and across the majority of subgroups, including by PD-L1 expression level (Table) or histology. Any grade and grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 92% and 48% of pts in the NIVO + IPI + chemo arm vs 88% and 38% in the chemo arm, respectively. Conclusion: With 2 years’ minimum follow-up, first-line NIVO + IPI + chemo demonstrated durable survival and benefit versus chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC; no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03215706. [Table: see text]

Nivolumab (NIVO) + low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) as first-line (1L) therapy in microsatellite instability-high/DNA mismatch repair deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Clinical update.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3521-3521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
Sara Lonardi ◽  
Vittorina Zagonel ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
M. Luisa Limon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
Grade 3

3521 Background: In the phase 2 CheckMate 142 trial, NIVO + low-dose IPI provided robust and durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as 1L therapy for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC (Lenz et al. Ann Oncol 2018;29:LBA18). Longer follow-up data will be presented. Methods: Patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC and no prior treatment for metastatic disease received NIVO 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks + low-dose IPI 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Results: For all 45 patients (median follow-up was 13.8 months), ORR was 60% (95% CI 44.3–74.3). Responses were consistent with the overall population across subgroups including age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy, and mutation status (Table). Seven patients (16%) had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); 3 (7%) had any grade TRAEs leading to discontinuation. Updated response, survival, and safety data after a longer follow-up (median 19.9 months) will be presented. Conclusions: NIVO + low-dose IPI demonstrated robust and durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated. Evaluated subgroups had responses consistent with the overall population. NIVO + low-dose IPI may represent a new 1L treatment option for patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT02060188. [Table: see text]

The efficacy and safety analysis of PD-1 inhibitor combined with interferon-α1b: A real-world study in Chinese metastatic melanoma patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21507-e21507
Author(s):  
Guannan Zhu ◽  
Qiong Shi ◽  
Chunying Li ◽  
Tianwen Gao
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Melanoma Patients ◽  
Grade 3

e21507 Background: Clinical data on PD-1 inhibitor combined with interferon in metastatic melanoma treatment were still limited. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitor/interferon-α1b combination therapy for Chinese metastatic melanoma patients in the real world. Methods: We reviewed patients diagnosed as metastatic melanoma and had received PD-1 inhibitor (pembrolizumab, 2 mg/kg, every 3 weeks, intravenously or toripalimab 240mg every 2 weeks, intravenously) combined with interferon-α1b(10μg/kg, every other day, subcutaneously) in Xijing Hospital from Dec 2018 to Nov 2020. Efficacy and safety profiles were evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, respectively. Results: In total 65 patients were reviewed in this study, including 13 cases with ECOG performance status ≥2. Acral and mucosal cases accounted for 47.7% and 23.1% respectively. In 27(41.5%) patients, the combination therapy was used as the first line treatment, whereas in the rest 38 patients as second or subsequent lines. The median follow-up period was 8 months (1.5-21 months). Median OS was 15 months (95CI%: 10.62-19.38 months). Median PFS was 6 months (95CI%: 2.54-9.46 months). 6-month and 1-year PFS rate were 48.1% and 35.3%. 6-month and 1-year OS rate were 80.9% and 59.8%. Objective response was seen in 18.46% cases, with 12.31% of patients exhibiting ongoing response. The best confirmed disease control rate was 73.85%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that overall survival was significantly associated with ECOG performance status ≥2 (OR=3.32，95%CI=1.14-9.66 ), regardless of age(≥65), elevated LDH, PD-1 inhibitor type and the line of the combination therapy. Select treatment related AEs (TRAEs) of any grade were observed in 57(87.69%) patients. The leading 3 TRAEs were lymphopenia, fatigue and fever. Grade 3 to 4 TRAEs were recorded in 2 cases. Grade 4 hyponeutrophilia occurred in a patient with ECOG status 3 using interferon-α1b plus toripalimab and resulted in discontinuation of both PD-1 inhibitor and IFN-α1b. Grade 3 headache was reported by one patient using interferon-α1b plus pembrolizumab and was solved with celecoxib 200mg daily. No drug-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: PD-1 inhibitor combining interferon-α1b therapy shows promising efficacy and acceptable toxicity in this real-world cohort of Chinese metastatic melanoma patients.[Table: see text]

Gemcitabine plus carboplatin versus gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin in cisplatin unfit patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: A randomized phase II study (COACH, KCSG GU10-16).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4534-4534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Lyun Lee ◽  
Bong-Seog Kim ◽  
Ho Yeong Lim ◽  
Hee Jun Kim ◽  
Inkeun Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

4534 Background: We investigated the activity and safety of first-line gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (GemOx) compared with gemcitabine-carboplatin (GCb) in cisplatin-ineligible patients with advanced UCCC. Methods: Treatment naïve, cisplatin-ineligible patients with advanced UCCC were randomly assigned to GemOx [gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2, oxliplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 (D1) every 2 weeks] or GCb (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on D1 and D8, carboplatin AUCC 4.5 on D1 every 3 weeks) stratified by ECOG performance status (PS) and visceral metastases. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Between January 2011 and Mar 2017, 80 patients were enrolled; 39 patients and 40 patients were allocated to GCb and GemOx arm, respectively. Median age was 72 years (range 46-84) in GCb arm and 72.5 (55-85) in GemOx arm. ECOG PS was 2 in 41% (GCb arm) and 43% (GemOx arm), and median GFR was 45 ml/min (interquartile range 36-56) in GCb and 47 ml/min (37-56) in GemOx arm. ORR were 48.7% and 55.0% in GCb and GemOx, respectively. With a median follow-up duration of 37.8 months, median PFS and OS in GCb and GemOx arm were 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.8-6.2) vs. 4.4 months (95% CI, 2.7-6.1) and 9.1 months (95% CI, 5.2-13.0) vs. 11.0 months (95% CI, 6.9-15.0), respectively. Grade 3 leukopenia, neutropenia and fatigue were significantly more common in GCb arm (26% vs. 3%, p=0.003; 33% vs. 10%, p=0.014; 15% vs. 3%, p=0.057) while any grade neuropathy was more common in GemOx (8% vs. 60%, p<0.001). Conclusions: GemOx has showed comparable efficacy with GCb and favorable hematologic toxicity profile. GemOx may be used as a new option for UCCC patients who are not suitable for platinum-containing chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01487915.

Association between complete response and survival in advanced melanoma treated with talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) plus ipilimumab (ipi).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10029-10029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Alan Chesney ◽  
Igor Puzanov ◽  
Frances A. Collichio ◽  
Mohammed M. Milhem ◽  
Axel Hauschild ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Kaplan Meier

10029 Background: This is the first randomized trial testing the addition of an oncolytic virus to an immune checkpoint inhibitor for advanced melanoma. At the 3-year (yr) follow-up, the combination (combo) of T-VEC and ipi demonstrated durable and statistically superior objective response rate (ORR) over ipi alone (36.7% vs. 16.0%; odds ratio, 3.0; 95% Cl, 1.6–6.0; P = 0.002). Complete response (CR) rate was 21.4% with the combo and 6.0% with ipi. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in either arm. In this post hoc analysis, we utilized the 3-yr landmark data to explore the relationship between CR and OS in the combo arm. Methods: Pts with unresectable, stage IIIB-IV melanoma were randomized 1:1 to receive combo or ipi alone. T-VEC was administered intratumorally on day 1 of week (wk) 1 at 106 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL followed by subsequent doses at 108 PFU/mL on day 1 of wk 4, and every 2 wks thereafter. Ipi (3 mg/kg) was given every 3 wks starting on day 1 of wk 6 for up to 4 doses. Response was assessed by investigators per immune-related response criteria every 12 wks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was ORR; key secondary endpoints were OS, progression-free survival, and safety. Results: 198 pts were randomized (98 to combo; 100 to ipi). As of February 25, 2019, the median follow-up time was 40.0 mos (range: 0.2–63.7) for the combo arm. Among 98 pts who received combo, 21 (21.4%) had a best overall response of CR including 8 who converted from an initial partial response (PR), 15 (15.3%) had PR, 19 (19.4%) had stable disease, 30 (30.6%) had progressive disease, and 13 (13.2%) were unevaluable. Of 21 pts achieving CR, 17 (81%) had ECOG status of 0, 16 (76.2%) had stage IIIB-IVM1a disease, and 16 (76.2%) had no visceral metastases. Median duration of CR was not reached (range: 5.4[+]–58.2[+] mos); 19 of 21 CRs lasted more than 6 months. The baseline tumor burden was lower in pts with CR than in those with non-CR. Median OS was not reached in pts with CR (range: 25.1[+]–63.7[+] mos) and was 47.6 mos (range: 0.2[+]– 63.7[+] mos) in pts with non-CR (Log-rank P = 0.0005). The Kaplan–Meier estimated 3-year OS rate was 100.0% for patients with CR and 52.3% for those with non-CR. Conclusions: CR rate was higher with T-VEC plus ipi than with ipi alone in pts with advanced melanoma (21.4% vs. 6.0%). In the combo arm, CR was associated with prolonged OS, and pts with CR tended to have better ECOG performance status, earlier-stage disease, and lower baseline tumor burden, as compared with those with non-CR. Clinical trial information: NCT01740297.

Clinical activity of fianlimab (REGN3767), a human anti-LAG-3 monoclonal antibody, combined with cemiplimab (anti-PD-1) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9515-9515
Author(s):  
Omid Hamid ◽  
Ding Wang ◽  
Tae Min Kim ◽  
Sang-We Kim ◽  
Nehal J. Lakhani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3

9515 Background: Fianlimab and cemiplimab are two high-affinity, fully human, hinge-stabilized IgG4 monoclonal antibodies. In a Phase 1 dose escalation study, fianlimab combined with cemiplimab showed an acceptable safety profile and some clinical activity in pts with advanced malignancies. Here, we present safety and clinical activity data from two expansion cohorts of pts with advanced melanoma (anti–programmed cell death/ligand-1 [anti–PD-(L)1] naïve or experienced) who were treated with fianlimab + cemiplimab and had an opportunity for first on-treatment tumor assessment (cut-off date: Jan 4, 2021). Methods: Pts with advanced melanoma who had no prior anti–PD-(L)1 treatment (naïve) or prior anti–PD-(L)1 treatment within 3 months of screening (experienced) received fianlimab 1600 mg + cemiplimab 350 mg by IV infusion every 3 weeks. Tumor measurements were performed every 6 weeks for the first 24 weeks and subsequently every 9 weeks per RECIST v1.1. Results: 48 pts with advanced melanoma were treated with the combination therapy: 33 were anti–PD-(L)1 naïve and 15 were anti–PD-(L)1 experienced (median age: 69 years vs 59 years; male: 66.7% vs 46.7%; Caucasian: 87.9% vs 60%). The safety profile (including immune-related adverse events [AEs]) of fianlimab + cemiplimab combination therapy was similar to that of anti–PD-1 monotherapy with one exception. The rate of adrenal insufficiency, 8.3% (4/48) of pts, is similar to the rate previously observed with anti–PD-1 + anti–cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) combination therapy but higher than that observed with anti–PD-1 monotherapy. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 35.4% (17/48) of patients; Grade ≥3 serious TEAEs occurred in 22.9% (11/48) of patients; 8.3% (4/48) of patients discontinued treatment due to a TEAE. The most common TEAEs were fatigue (n = 15, 31.3%) and rash (n = 11, 22.9%). By investigator assessment, objective response rate (includes unconfirmed complete [CR] and partial responses [PR]) was 63.6% (3 CRs and 18 PRs) for anti–PD-(L)1 naïve pts and 13.3% (1 CR and 1 PR) for anti–PD-(L)1 experienced pts. Median progression-free survival and median duration of response for the anti–PD-(L)1 treatment naïve cohort have not been reached. Prognostic clinical markers and tumor biomarkers such as expression of LAG-3, PD-L1, and major histocompatibility complex II are being evaluated. Recruitment is ongoing. Conclusions: The safety profile of fianlimab + cemiplimab is similar to that observed with cemiplimab monotherapy and other anti–PD-1s, with the exception of higher rate of adrenal insufficiency. Fianlimab + cemiplimab combination has shown clinical activity for pts with advanced melanoma that is similar to anti–PD-1 + CTLA-4 combination therapy, but with lower demonstrated rates of TEAEs. Clinical trial information: NCT03005782.

DREAMseq (Doublet, Randomized Evaluation in Advanced Melanoma Sequencing): A phase III trial—ECOG-ACRIN EA6134.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (36_suppl) ◽  
pp. 356154-356154
Author(s):  
Michael B. Atkins ◽  
Sandra J. Lee ◽  
Bartosz Chmielowski ◽  
Antoni Ribas ◽  
Ahmad A. Tarhini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Treatment Sequence ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Evaluation ◽  
Alternate Therapy ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3

356154 Background: Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) blocking PD-1 and CTLA-4 or BRAF/MEK inhibitors have both shown significant antitumor efficacy and overall survival (OS) benefit in patients (pts) with BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma (MM), leading to broad regulatory approval. Little prospective data exists to guide the choice of one over the other as initial therapy or the preferred treatment sequence in this population. The DREAMseq Trial was designed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of the sequence of nivolumab/ipilimumab (N/I) followed by dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) to the converse sequence. Methods: Eligible pts with treatment-naive BRAFV600-mutant MM were stratified by ECOG Performance Status (PS) 0 or 1 and LDH level and randomized 1:1 to receive Step 1 with either N/I (Arm A) or D/T (Arm B) and at disease progression (PD) were enrolled in Step 2 receiving the alternate therapy, D/T (Arm C) or N/I (Arm D), respectively. Pts received N (1mg/kg)/I (3 mg/kg) q3 wks x 4 doses followed by N 240 IV q2 wks for up to 72 wks (Arms A and D) or D 150 mg po BID and T 2 mg po qD until PD (Arms B and C). In 2019, investigators were given the option to use alternate induction dosing of N (3mg/kg)/I (1 mg/kg) q3 wks x 4 doses for Arms A and D. Cycles were every 6 wks and imaging was obtained at baseline and q12 wks on each arm. Primary endpoint was 2-year OS. At the 4th Interim Analysis with 59% of pts being 2 yrs from enrollment, the DSMC and NCI CTEP recommended halting accrual and releasing the data. Results: Beginning 7/2015, 265 out of a proposed 300 pts were enrolled (133 Arm A and 132 Arm B). Median age was 61 (25-85) and 63% were male. Demographics for Arm A and B were balanced with 67% PS 0 and 60% with normal LDH. As of 7/16/21, at a median follow-up of 27.7 mos, 27 pts had switched to Arm C and 46 to Arm D. Overall Grade 3+ toxicity was 60% in Arm A and 52% in Arm B. Grade 5 treatment-related AEs included 2 on Arm A and 1 on Arm C. ORR to date is: Arm A 46% (52/113), Arm B 43% (49/114), Arm C 48% (11/23) and Arm D 30% (8/27). 37/42 assessed pts in Arm A and 19/37 in Arm B remain in response. Median DOR: Arm A- Not reached; Arm B-12.7 mos (95% CI: 8.2, -) (p <0.001). There were 100 deaths (Arm A to C- 38/Arm B to D- 62). 2-yr OS rate for those starting with Arm A was 72% (95% CI: 62-81%) and for Arm B 52% (95% CI: 42-62%) (log-rank p= 0.0095). PFS showed a trend in favor of Arm A (log-rank p=0.054). Both the PFS and OS curves show a biphasic pattern with Arm B being above Arm A until 6 and 10 mos, respectively. For the 115 pts with documented progression on Step 1 (Arm A-44/Arm B-71), 60 (52%) had registered for Step 2. The principal reason for not enrolling on Step 2 was death from PD within 6 mos (Arm A:15/23; Arm B: 25/32). Conclusions: For pts with advanced BRAFV600-mutant MM, the treatment sequence beginning with the CPI combination of N/I resulted in superior OS, which became evident at 10 mos, with longer Step 1 DOR and more ongoing responses than the treatment sequence beginning with D/T. Clinical trial information: NCT02224781.

scholarly journals Real-World Experience of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Patients with Recurrent or Persistent Cervical Cancer: A Korean Multi-Center Retrospective Study (KGOG1041)

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Chul Choi ◽  
Yong-Man Kim ◽  
Jeong-Won Lee ◽  
Yong Jae Lee ◽  
Dong Hoon Suh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Real World ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Recurrent Cervical Cancer

This study investigated the antitumor activity and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent cervical cancer in real-world practice. We conducted a multi-center retrospective study of patients with recurrent or persistent cervical cancer treated with pembrolizumab at sixteen institutions in Korea between January 2016 and March 2020. The primary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Data were available for 117 patients. The median age was 53 years (range, 28–79). Sixty-four (54.7%) patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≥2. Forty-nine (41.9%) patients were stage ≥III at diagnosis. Eighty-eight (75.2%) patients had squamous cell carcinoma. The median number of prior chemotherapy lines was two (range, 1–6). During the median follow-up of 4.9 months (range, 0.2–35.3), the ORR was 9.4%, with three complete responses and eight partial responses. The median time to response was 2.8 months (range 1.3–13.1), and the median duration of response (DOR) was not reached. In the population of patients with favorable performance status (ECOG ≤1) (n = 53), the ORR was 18.9%, and the median DOR was 8.9 months (range, 7.3–10.4). Adverse events occurred in 55 (47.0%) patients, including eight (6.8%) patients who experienced grade ≥3 events, and two of them were suspicious treatment-related deaths. Pembrolizumab had modest antitumor activity in patients with recurrent cervical cancer comparable to that found in previously reported clinical trials. However, in patients with favorable performance status, pembrolizumab showed effective antitumor activity. Some safety profiles should be carefully monitored during treatment.

scholarly journals Real-world efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a study by the Korean Cancer Study Group

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591987112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changhoon Yoo ◽  
Hyeon-Su Im ◽  
Kyu-pyo Kim ◽  
Do-Youn Oh ◽  
Kyung-Hun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan

Background: Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) was effective and well-tolerated in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC) that progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy in the global NAPOLI-1 trial. Real-world data may further clarify the outcomes and safety profile of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV in clinical practice. Methods: This retrospective analysis included patients with mPAC who received nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV following gemcitabine-based therapy under a Managed Access Program in Korea. Results: From January 2017 to April 2018, 86 patients across 10 institutions received nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV (median age, 61 years; 60% male; ECOG performance status, 0–1). A total of 35 (41%) and 51 (59%) patients had received less than two and two or more lines of chemotherapy before inclusion, respectively. At a median follow up of 6.4 months, median overall survival (OS) was 9.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.4–11.4) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months (95% CI 1.3–5.7). Six-month OS and PFS rates were 65.1% and 37.5%, respectively. Objective response and disease control rates were 10% and 55%, respectively. Most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (37.2%), nausea (10.5%), vomiting (9.3%), anorexia (8.1%) and diarrhoea (4.7%). Conclusion: Real-life data for Korean patients indicate that, consistent with NAPOLI-1, nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV is effective and well-tolerated in patients with mPAC that progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy.

Fludarabine and Mitoxantrone for the Refractory Relapse Treatment of B-Cell Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL): LACOHG First Interim Report (Latin American Cooperative Oncology Hematology Group).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4665-4665
Author(s):  
Severiano Baltazar-Arellano ◽  
Patricia Pimentel ◽  
Luis Vera ◽  
Fernando Bezares ◽  
Jose Málaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Ann Arbor ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: fludarabine (F) is licensed for the management of indolent non Hodgkin’s lymphoma in countries such as Canada and Switzerland. Clinical evidence suggests that fludarabine monotherapy is as least as effective, than conventional therapies such as cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (CVP) for the first and second line treatment of B-cell low grade NHL achieving objective response rates. Better response rates can be achieved combining F with Mitoxantrone (M) in low grade NHL even in refractory relapsed (RR) patients (pts). The Latin American Cooperative Oncology Hematology Group (LACOHG) proposed a multicenter study in Latin American countries in 2002 to use FM in RR B-cell low grade NHL. Aims: to assess the response rate, safety, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of FM in RR B-cell low grade NHL during (2003–2006). Methods: Forty-eight patients in the period of January 2003 to February 2006 were evaluated. Forty-four pts. had follicular lymphoma and 4 small lymphocytic lymphoma. Median age 63.5 years old (range: 24–83). Gender: female 56% and male 44%. Inclusion criteria for low grade NHL-LG was: any previous treatment excluding autologous transplantation, Ann Arbor stage II to IV, age &gt; 18 years old, ECOG performance status 0–2 and written informed consent. ECOG performance status 0: 2%, 1: 71% and 2: 27%. Ann Arbor staging: II: 2%, III: 29% and IV: 69%. International Prognostic Index (IPI): 0–1: 19%, 2–3: 71% and 4–5: 10%. Median previous treatment was 1 (range: 1–3). FM treatment consisted of F 25 mg/m2 i.v. (day 1–3) and M 10 mg/m m2 i.v. (day 1) each 28 days for 6–8 cycles. Results: on this low grade NHL cohort the overall response rate (ORR was 81%; progressive disease and non-response 19%. With a median follow up of 17 months, OS at 24 months was 86% (DE 5.2%) and DFS at 24 months 57.1% (DE 11.3%). LDH in serum was not an adverse prognostic factor for DFS and OS. Safety: on the 286 cycles in 48 pts, the toxicity was: 18 episodes of grade 3-4 neutropenias, 15 episodes of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia, 7 episodes of grade 1–2 nausea/vomiting, grade 1–2 diarrhea in 4 pts, 8 pts were admitted to the clinic, 11 fever episodes, 2 allopecia, 4 pts developed grade 1–2 peripheral neuropathy and infections 7%: one case herpes zoster. Mortality rate: 12,5% (6/48 patients), 5 of them because progressive disease. No cardiac toxicity was reported. Conclusions: FM is an effective and safe treatment for RR low grade NHL. A longer follow up and a larger trial, might be needed to confirm these results in a multicenter, randomized study. DFS with FM in RR low grade NHL : LACOHG DFS with FM in RR low grade NHL : LACOHG

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document