Development of a multidisciplinary approach to supportive care for patients with genitourinary cancers.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 88-88
Author(s):  
Liana Yocavitch ◽  
Gregory D. Garber ◽  
Alison Petok ◽  
Brooke Worster ◽  
Nathan Handley
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Patient Journey ◽  
Personalized Care ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Optimal Screening ◽  
High Distress ◽  
Genitourinary Cancers

88 Background: Patients with cancer who engage early with palliative care may experience improved quality of life (QOL), increased overall survival (OS), and decreased acute care utilization. The Neu Center for Supportive Medicine and Cancer Survivorship (NCSMC) at Thomas Jefferson University is a program designed to identify patients who would benefit from early intervention palliative and supportive care and deliver appropriate services. After initial experience with the model in patients with gastrointestinal and head and neck malignancies, the NCSMC is expanding to patients with genitourinary cancers. Methods: A multidisciplinary team consisting of palliative care physicians, social work, psychology, and navigation conducts biopsychosocial screening (using the NCCN Distress Thermometer) and initiates a personalized care plan for each patient to clarify treatment goals and offer assistance. Prior to deploying the program, multiple stakeholders were engaged to discuss optimal screening points in the patient journey. Patients with a new cancer diagnosis are approached at a post-operative visit in the urology clinic; patients with high distress or significant barriers are discussed at a weekly interdisciplinary meeting with a team of physicians, nurses, social workers, and psychiatry. Patients are subsequently referred to services identified as potentially beneficial. Results: In the first 10 weeks of the program, 67 patients with new diagnoses of bladder (28, 41.8%), prostate (21, 31.3%), kidney (12, 17.9%), urothelial (5, 7.5%), and testicular (1, 1.5%) cancers were screened. 38 (59.4%) patients were identified as low distress; 24 patients (36%) were identified as high distress and offered NCSMC services. Two patients utilized services. Conclusions: Distress and barriers to care amongst patients with newly diagnosed genitourinary cancers are highly variable. While evaluating all patients in the immediate post-operative period is effective at identifying affected patients, the process is resource intensive. An iterative approach testing the intervention at different points in the patient journey is ongoing. As the program matures, impact on QOL, OS, and utilization will be measured.

Impact of mortality reviews on supportive care utilization, end-of-life care, and inpatient mortality.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 45-45
Author(s):  
Yasmin Karimi ◽  
Vasu Divi ◽  
Sandy Srinivas ◽  
Andrea Segura Smith ◽  
Jennifer Hansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Chi Square Analysis

45 Background: 22% of US patients with cancer die in a hospital setting. As part of an effort to reduce unexpected inpatient (inpt) mortality, we reviewed records of all inpt cancer deaths at Stanford Hospital and reported findings to the treatment teams. Methods: Deaths with a cancer related ICD 9/10 code between 5/2017 and 6/2019 were reviewed by a multidisciplinary team. Findings and potential opportunities for improvement were communicated to the pt’s primary outpt oncologist, inpt oncologists and other involved providers. Observed to expected (O:E) mortality for the year prior to the intervention (5/2016–4/2017), Year 1 (5/2017–4/2018) and Year 2 (5/2018–4/2019) of the intervention were compared with two sided t test, α=0.05 (Vizient Inc, Irving TX). Changes in supportive care utilization and end of life care between cases reviewed in Year 1 and Year 2 were compared with chi square analysis. Results: There were 236 inpatient deaths reviewed. The median age was 64 years; 76% had solid tumors; 68% had metastatic disease; 33% had a previous inpt admission; 34% received chemotherapy in the last 2 weeks of life. Median length of stay was 7 days and 37% were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The O:E mortality ratio significantly decreased between the year prior to intervention and Year 2 (0.95 vs. 0.69; p = .019), and Years 1 and 2 (0.90 vs. 0.69; p = .003). There was no noted difference in number of palliative care consults or resuscitation status at the time of death between Years 1 and 2. There was an increased frequency of advance care plan documentation on admission in Year 2 (p = .007). Conclusions: Cancer pts who die in the hospital have high rates of recent hospitalizations, chemotherapy/radiation use in the last 2 weeks of life and ICU admissions. Decrease in O:E is likely multifactorial. Potential factors are improved documentation of comorbidities, increased access to palliative care services, and facilitation of hospice referrals which were partially driven by results of our reviews and resulting awareness around end of life care. Work is ongoing to standardize documentation of goals of care conversations in the electronic medical record and employ lay health workers for earlier end of life discussions.

scholarly journals Recent advances in non-surgical management of cancer in the elderly

F1000Research ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 1793
Author(s):  
Emily J. Guerard ◽  
Gil E. Harmon ◽  
Kieran D. Sahasrabudhe ◽  
Noelle K. LoConte
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
The Body ◽  
The Other ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Chemotherapy Agents

This article summarizes the seminal publications from mid-2016 through 2017 in the area of medical care for older adults with cancer. Areas addressed include chemotherapy tolerance and efficacy in the aged, geriatric fitness assessments, and advancements in palliative and supportive care. The practice-changing finding from this past year’s publications is that antipsychotics should not be used in the management of terminal delirium in older adults receiving palliative care. The other trials demonstrated an improved understanding of the utility of geriatric assessments in patients with cancer, developed the body of information about which chemotherapy agents are safe and effective in older adults (and which are not), and expanded our understanding of good palliative and supportive care.

A randomized trial of a palliative care intervention for patients on phase I studies.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12001-12001
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Smith ◽  
Vincent Chung ◽  
Mark T. Hughes ◽  
Marianna Koczywas ◽  
Nilofer Saba Azad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Phase I Clinical Trials ◽  
Care Intervention

12001 Background: The purpose of this study was to test a Palliative Care Intervention for patients with solid tumors enrolled in phase I therapeutic trials. Methods: This randomized trial compared patients accrued to phase I Clinical Trials in groups of Usual Care compared to a Palliative Care Intervention (PCI) in two comprehensive cancer centers. The PCI included assessment of quality of life (QOL) and symptoms, an interdisciplinary meeting to discuss the care plan, including goals of care, and two nurse-delivered teaching sessions. Subjects (n=479) were followed for 24 weeks, with 12 weeks as the primary outcome point. Results: Outcomes revealed that relative to Usual Care, PCI subjects showed less Psychological Distress (1.9 in Intervention and 1.2 in Control pts, p=0.03) and a trend toward improved QOL (3.7 versus 1.6, p=0.07), with differences between sites. We observed high rates of symptom-management admissions (41.3%) and low rates of Advance Directive completion (39%), and use of supportive care services including hospice (30.7%, for only1.2 months duration), despite a median survival for all patients in both groups of 10.1 months from initiating a phase 1 study until death. Patient satisfaction with oncology care was already high at baseline, and we did not see clinically significant changes in those scores by week 12. Conclusions: Palliative care interventions can improve QOL outcomes and distress for patients participating in phase 1 trials. Greater integration of PC is needed to provide quality care to these patients and to support transitions from treatment to supportive care, especially at the end of life. Clinical trial information: NCT01828775 .

Using a supportive care framework to understand and improve palliative care among cancer patients in Africa

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 284-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Busolo ◽  
Roberta L. Woodgate
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
African Countries ◽  
Research Education ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
Palliative Care Services

ABSTRACTObjective:Cancer incidence and mortality are increasing in Africa, which is leading to greater demands for palliative care. There has been little progress in terms of research, pain management, and policies related to palliative care. Palliative care in Africa is scarce and scattered, with most African nations lacking the basic services. To address these needs, a guiding framework that identifies care needs and directs palliative care services could be utilized. Therefore, using the supportive care framework developed by Fitch (Fitch, 2009), we here review the literature on palliative care for patients diagnosed with cancer in Africa and make recommendations for improvement.Method:The PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Medline databases were searched. Some 25 English articles on research from African countries published between 2004 and 2014 were selected and reviewed. The reviewed literature was analyzed and presented using the domains of the supportive care framework.Results:Palliative care patients with cancer in Africa, their families, and caregivers experience increasing psychological, physical, social, spiritual, emotional, informational, and practical needs. Care needs are often inadequately addressed because of a lack of awareness as well as deficient and scattered palliative care services and resources. In addition, there is sparse research, education, and policies that address the dire situation in palliative care.Significance of Results:Our review findings add to the existing body of knowledge demonstrating that palliative care patients with cancer in Africa experience disturbing care needs in all domains of the supportive care framework. To better assess and address these needs, holistic palliative care that is multidomain and multi-professional could be utilized. This approach needs to be individualized and to offer better access to services and information. In addition, research, education, and policies around palliative care for cancer patients in Africa could be more comprehensive if they were based on the domains of the supportive care framework.

Patterns of palliative care utilization and end of life care in adult patients with cancer who died as inpatients at Mayo Clinic.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21681-e21681
Author(s):  
Collin Thomas Zimmerman ◽  
Shivani S. Shinde ◽  
Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi ◽  
Mark Robert Litzow ◽  
Jeanne M. Huddleston
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Mayo Clinic ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Patients With Cancer

Supportive care day hospital: A new tool for palliative care in cancer centers.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 170-170
Author(s):  
Carole Bouleuc
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Day Hospital ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
At Home

170 Background: In May 2005, the Curie Institute in Paris opened the first supportive care day hospital in France. This type of new ward is now very frequent in the French comprehensive cancer centers. Methods: Patients are managed by the palliative care team with a two-part team of a physician and a nurse in order to address their supportive care needs: advanced-care symptoms, psychosocial distress, medical questions and concerns, support need in decision making, end of life care preference and advance care plan when patients or caregivers when needed. Depending of the needs identified by the palliative care team assess, at least 2 of the following healthcare professionals will intervene: oncologist, pain physician, psycho-oncologist, dietitician, social worker, physiotherapist. Coordination with the home care team takes systematically place (with general practitioner, nurse and home palliative care team). New symptoms occurrence are explored with biological test or radiographic examination when necessary. Medical procedures are sometimes performed like venous perfusion therapy, blood transfusions, or draining effusion after ultrasonic tracking. It is possible to offer the patient hypnosis, relaxation or sophrology consultation. Eventually at the end of the in-patient stay, the patient is given a medical synthesis with therapeutic recommendations and personalized care plan. 1 Physician and two nurses are needed to manage 4 patients every day. Results: In 2016 we have admitted 350 patients and performed 948 stays in our supportive rand 55% of them have breast cancer. Median survival since the first day at supportive care day hospital is 65 days. Death at home occurred in 15% of patients and in hospice for 62%. Home death is more often when patients don’t have any dyspnea are included in a home palliative care network and when they receive the last chemotherapy more than 30 days before death. More date will be shown. Conclusions: Supportive care day hospital is really a good tool for integrated palliative care, promoting collaboration with oncologists, coordination with home care teams, and advance care planning, so that patients can longer stay at home as they often hope so.

scholarly journals Telehealth and Palliative Care for Patients With Cancer: Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udhayvir Singh Grewal ◽  
Stephanie Terauchi ◽  
Muhammad Shaalan Beg
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Supportive Care Needs ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
Oncology Providers

UNSTRUCTURED It has been reported that the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection is higher in patients with cancer than in the general population and that patients with cancer are at an increased risk of developing severe life-threatening complications from COVID-19. Increased transmission and poor outcomes noted in emerging data on patients with cancer and COVID-19 call for aggressive isolation and minimization of nosocomial exposure. Palliative care and oncology providers are posed with unique challenges due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Telepalliative care is the use of telehealth services for remotely delivering palliative care to patients through videoconferencing, telephonic communication, or remote symptom monitoring. It offers great promise in addressing the palliative and supportive care needs of patients with advanced cancer during the ongoing pandemic. We discuss the case of a 75-year-old woman who was initiated on second-line chemotherapy, to highlight how innovations in technology and telehealth-based interventions can be used to address patients’ palliative and supportive care needs in the ongoing epidemic.

scholarly journals Factors Influencing Palliative Care Utilization Among Patients With Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minenhle S. Dlamini ◽  
Khumbulani W. Hlongwana ◽  
Siyabonga B. Dlamini ◽  
Themba G. Ginindza
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Cancer Symptoms ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Factors Influencing

Abstract Background: Cancer remains a public health challenge in low-and-middle income countries (LMICs). Over 30% of those in need of palliative care (PC) worldwide suffer from cancer and 80% of patients with cancer in LMICs are diagnosed at advanced stages, by which time they can only benefit from PC services. The aim of this study was to determine factors influencing PC utilization among patients with cancer in KZN.Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was used among patients who had been diagnosed with different cancers and attending Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital (IALCH), Addington Hospital, Pietermaritzburg Grey’s hospital, Msunduzi and Chatsworth Hospices. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select participants. Structured questionnaires were administered to a total of 394 patients. The questionnaire included two open-ended questions and the generated data was analysed and presented into two formats; firstly, the textual data was entered into REDcap (v.8.11.7) and then exported to IBM SPSS Statistics (v.25) and recoded for emerging themes which were later presented in a graph format. Secondly, the thematic analysis was presented in textual format and supported with verbatims quotes. Results: The mean (+SD) age of the 394 participants was 51.89 (+14.67) years and about 22.9% were within the age-group 41–50 years. Majority of participants were females (77.7%) and were unmarried (60.6%). Most of the participants’ racial classification was black (81.5%) and 64.5% had primary education. More than four-fifths (82.7%) were unemployed, 55.8% lived in urban areas and 24.6% had cervical cancer. The analysis of the two open-ended questions incorporated into the questionnaire revealed five themes as major barriers preventing cancer patients from seeking PC services.Conclusion: Lack of knowledge and awareness about cancer symptoms and PC services could be addressed by better education of the public. Hence, utilization of PC could be maximized, thereby providing a better quality of life for the sufferers and their families until the end of life’s journey. The study also provides information that can be used to strengthen and/or to develop PC guidelines addressing PC issues. Keywords: Cancer, Palliative care, barriers, utilization, KwaZulu-Natal

Symptom burden in hospitalized patients with curable and incurable cancers.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 190-190
Author(s):  
Lauren Waldman ◽  
Richard Newcomb ◽  
Ryan David Nipp ◽  
Ephraim P. Hochberg ◽  
Vicki Jackson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Psychological Symptoms ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Care Utilization

190 Background: Inpatient supportive care interventions are targeted to patients with advanced solid tumors due to perceived higher symptom burden. Yet, few studies have characterized symptom prevalence in hospitalized patients with curable cancers. We aimed to describe and compare symptom burden and palliative care utilization in hospitalized patients with curable and incurable cancers to determine the allocation of such supportive care resources. Methods: We conducted a single center study of 1549 patients (238 curable hematologic, 239 curable solid, 123 incurable hematologic, 949 incurable solid cancers) who experienced an unplanned hospitalization between 9/14 - 4/17. On admission, we assessed patients’ physical symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System) and psychological distress (Patient Health Questionnaire - 4 and Primary Care PTSD Screen). Results: The median number of moderate to severe symptoms reported by patients with curable hematologic, curable solid, incurable hematologic, and incurable solid cancers were 5 [3-6], 5 [3-7], 5 [4-6], and 6 [4-7], respectively. Most patients reported moderate to severe fatigue (83.6%, 82.9%, 81.3%, 86.9%). Table 1 depicts rates of psychological distress. In adjusted analyses patients with incurable solid cancers reported higher symptom burden (β = 7.6, p < 0.01), depression (β = 0.4, p = 0.01), and anxiety (β = 0.3, p = 0.03) symptoms, but no difference in PTSD symptoms. Among patients in top quartile of symptom burden, palliative care was consulted in 16.2%, 7.9%, 23.8%, and 49.6% (p < 0.01) of patients with curable hematologic, curable solid, incurable hematologic, and incurable solid cancers, respectively. Conclusions: Hospitalized patients with solid and hematologic cancers experience substantial physical and psychological symptoms regardless of the curability of their illness. Palliative care is rarely consulted for highly symptomatic patients with curable cancers. Inpatient supportive care interventions should target the needs of all highly symptomatic patients with cancer. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document