Germline alterations in urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients with family history of UC.
474 Background: UC is associated with germline alterations in a small minority of patients (pts). The prevalence of germline alterations in those with familial UC is unknown. We identified genomic alterations among familial UC pts to provide insights into pathogenesis and improve management. Methods: We analyzed deidentified data for UC pts with germline multigene panel testing (Invitae) who had a family history of UC, defined as a 1st-3rd degree relative with UC. Massively parallel sequencing used customized capture bait-sets to analyze exonic regions, flanking intronic sequences, and copy number variations (CNVs) for 1-126 genes. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants underwent orthogonal confirmation, per standard policy, including single nucleotide variants (SNVs)/small indels/CNVs. Patient characteristics were compared using the Fisher’s Exact and Wilcoxon-Rank Sum test. Results: 79 UC pts with a family history of UC were identified (67 bladder, 6 upper tract, 6 unknown). Six patients (8%) were excluded as the relation of the family member was unknown. 48/73 (66%) pts had first-degree relatives (fdr) with UC (4 upper tract, 39 bladder, 5 unknown) and 25 (34%) had second-degree (or higher) relatives (sdr) (2 upper tract, 22 bladder, 1 unknown). 56 germline alterations were found in 38 (52%) pts. 14 known pathogenic alterations occurred in 13 (18%) pts: SDHC (1), MITF (2), BRIP1 (1), BRCA2 (1), MSH2 (3), BRCA1 (1), CHEK2 (1), PTCH (1), MUTYH (2), BAP1 (1). 8/48 (17%) pts with fdr had pathogenic variants vs. 5/25 (20%) pts with sdr or more. There was no difference in the prevalence of pathogenic variants based on gender (p=0.37) or age (p=0.77). The limitations are modest sample size and differences in panels of genes. Conclusions: This is the first study to our knowledge to report germline alterations in UC pts with a family history of UC. Pathogenic germline alterations were seen in 18% of pts, which were enriched for DNA damage repair gene alterations, and could have important therapeutic implications. Further study of germline alterations using larger panels in pts with family history of UC may provide novel insights, since most pts did not have pathogenic alterations.