Small cell carcinoma of the prostate: National patterns of care and outcomes.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Zachary D. Horne ◽  
Ryan P Smith ◽  
Sushil Beriwal ◽  
Ronny Kalash ◽  
Ashwin Shinde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Cancer Data

9 Background: Small cell prostate cancer (SCPC) is a rare entity with treatment patterns extrapolated from small cell cancer of the lung. Outcomes have been evaluated in small series but prognostic factors are relatively poorly defined. Methods: We utilized the National Cancer Data Base to analyze men diagnosed with SCPC from 2004-2015. Only men with known clinical TNM staging, treatment modalities, and follow up were included. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed and compared with Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and Cox proportional hazards ratios. Associations with baseline and tumor properties were performed with Chi-squared, independent t-test, and bivariate regression analyses. Results: 800 men with SCPC were identified. Median PSA was 79.0 ng/dL. 55.6% of men had cM1 disease at diagnosis, 31.4% had cN0M0 disease, and 13.0% were cN1M0. Median follow up was 12.4 months for all patients and 19.3 months for cM0 patients. Median survival for cM1, cN0M0, and cN1M0 patients was 9.8, 28.5, and 17.1 months, respectively (p<0.001). In cM0 patients, 66 (18.7%) underwent radical prostatectomy (RP), 177 (50.1%) received radiation therapy (XRT), and 195 (45.2%) received chemotherapy (CT). Median survival for men undergoing RP was not reached vs those who did not undergo RP (p<0.001). XRT also showed a trend towards improved median OS (25.2 vs. 19.1 months, p=0.139). On multivariable analysis for cM0 men, only age (HR 1.044 [95% CI 1.025-10.64] p<0.001), cN1 (HR 1.378 [95% CI 1.001-1.898] p=0.050, RP (HR 0.429 [95% CI 0.259-0.709] p=0.001), and XRT (HR 0.520 [95% CI 0.384-0.704] p<0.001) were predictive for overall survival. When examining only men who received systemic therapy, XRT was the only additional treatment modality to exhibit a survival benefit (HR 0.623 [95% CI 0.425-0.912] p=0.015). Of men with cM1 disease, 78 (17.5%) underwent definitive local therapy (RP/XRT), but no difference in OS was observed. Conclusions: Small cell prostate cancer is an aggressive disease with the majority of men presenting with metastases. In those with pelvis-confined disease who are fit for systemic therapy, radiation therapy to the primary should be considered.

scholarly journals MBCL-14. A STUDY OF LOW-DOSE CRANIOSPINAL RADIATION THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED AVERAGE-RISK MEDULLOBLASTOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii390-iii391
Author(s):  
Aaron Mochizuki ◽  
Anna Janss ◽  
Sonia Partap ◽  
Paul Fisher ◽  
Yimei Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Average Risk ◽  
Craniospinal Radiation ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Therapy Studies ◽  
Do So

Abstract INTRODUCTION Medulloblastoma is one of the most common malignant brain tumors in children. To date, the treatment of average-risk (non-metastatic, completely resected) medulloblastoma includes craniospinal radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Modern treatment modalities and now risk stratification of subgroups have extended the survival of these patients, exposing the long-term morbidities associated with radiation therapy. METHODS We performed a single-arm, multi-institution study, seeking to reduce the late effects of treatment in patients with average-risk medulloblastoma prior to advances in molecular subgrouping. To do so, we reduced the dose of craniospinal irradiation by 25% to 18 gray with the goal of maintaining the therapeutic efficacy as described in CCG 9892 with maintenance chemotherapy. RESULTS 28 patients aged 3–30 years were enrolled across three institutions between April 2001 and December 2010. Median age at enrollment was 9 years with a median follow-up time of 11.7 years. The 3-year relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 78.6% (95% CI 58.4% to 89.8%) and 92.9% (95% CI 74.4% to 98.2%), respectively. The 5-year RFS and OS were 71.4% (95% CI 50.1% to 84.6%) and 85.7% (95% CI 66.3% to 94.4%), respectively. Toxicities were similar to those seen in other studies; there were no grade 5 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS Given the known neurocognitive adverse effects associated with cranial radiation therapy, studies to evaluate the feasibility of dose reduction are needed. In this study, we demonstrate that select patients with average-risk medulloblastoma may benefit from reduced craniospinal radiation dose of 18 gray without impacting relapse-free or overall survival.

scholarly journals Event-Free Survival, a Prostate-Specific Antigen–Based Composite End Point, Is Not a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Radiation

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (26) ◽  
pp. 3032-3041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanling Xie ◽  
Meredith M. Regan ◽  
Marc Buyse ◽  
Susan Halabi ◽  
Philip W. Kantoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
End Point

PURPOSE Recently, we have shown that metastasis-free survival is a strong surrogate for overall survival (OS) in men with intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer and can accelerate the evaluation of new (neo)adjuvant therapies. Event-free survival (EFS), an earlier prostate-specific antigen (PSA)–based composite end point, may further expedite trial completion. METHODS EFS was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of first evidence of disease recurrence, including biochemical failure, local or regional recurrence, distant metastasis, or death from any cause, or was censored at the date of last PSA assessment. Individual patient data from trials within the Intermediate Clinical Endpoints in Cancer of the Prostate–ICECaP–database with evaluable PSA and disease follow-up data were analyzed. We evaluated the surrogacy of EFS for OS using a 2-stage meta-analytic validation model by determining the correlation of EFS with OS (patient level) and the correlation of treatment effects (hazard ratios [HRs]) on both EFS and OS (trial level). A clinically relevant surrogacy was defined a priori as an R2 ≥ 0.7. RESULTS Data for 10,350 patients were analyzed from 15 radiation therapy–based trials enrolled from 1987 to 2011 with a median follow-up of 10 years. At the patient level, the correlation of EFS with OS was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.44) as measured by Kendall’s tau from a copula model. At the trial level, the R2 was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.60) from the weighted linear regression of log(HR)-OS on log(HR)-EFS. CONCLUSION EFS is a weak surrogate for OS and is not suitable for use as an intermediate clinical end point to substitute for OS to accelerate phase III (neo)adjuvant trials of prostate cancer therapies for primary radiation therapy–based trials.

Prostate-directed radiation therapy and overall survival for men with M1a prostate cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 101-101
Author(s):  
David Dewei Yang ◽  
Santino Butler ◽  
Vinayak Muralidhar ◽  
Brandon Arvin Virgil Mahal ◽  
Neil E. Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Androgen Deprivation Therapy ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
Gleason Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Metastatic Burden

101 Background: A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated that radiation therapy to the prostate improves overall survival for men with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer with a low metastatic burden. Most patients in this trial had bony metastases (stage M1b). The benefit of prostate-directed radiation therapy for men with metastases limited to non-regional lymph nodes (stage M1a) is unknown. We investigated the association between prostate-directed radiation therapy and overall survival for men with M1a prostate cancer. Methods: We identified 2,079 men from the National Cancer Database who were newly diagnosed with M1a prostate adenocarcinoma from 2004 through 2014 and had data on the use of androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Median follow-up was estimated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. The association between radiation therapy to the prostate and overall survival was examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: Overall, 12.7% (264) of patients received radiation therapy to the prostate. Median follow-up was 4.6 years (95% confidence interval 4.3-4.8 years). On multivariable analysis, when accounting for the use of androgen deprivation therapy and chemotherapy, Gleason grade group, clinical tumor and nodal stage, and prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis, the use of radiation therapy to the prostate was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.74, P<0.001). Adjusted median overall survival was 3.3 years for patients who did not receive radiation therapy to the prostate compared to 5.5 years for patients who did. Conclusions: Similar to newly diagnosed M1b prostate cancer with a low metastatic burden, patients with M1a prostate cancer may also derive a significant overall survival benefit from receiving radiation therapy to the primary prostate tumor. The use of prostate-directed radiation therapy for M1a patients should be further investigated.

Ten-Year Follow-Up of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 92-02: A Phase III Trial of the Duration of Elective Androgen Deprivation in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15) ◽  
pp. 2497-2504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric M. Horwitz ◽  
Kyounghwa Bae ◽  
Gerald E. Hanks ◽  
Arthur Porter ◽  
David J. Grignon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
End Points

PurposeTo determine whether adding 2 years of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) improved outcome for patients electively treated with ADT before and during radiation therapy (RT).Patients and MethodsProstate cancer patients with T2c-T4 prostate cancer with no extra pelvic lymph node involvement and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) less than 150 ng/mL were included. All patients received 4 months of goserelin and flutamide before and during RT. They were randomized to no further ADT (short-term ADT [STAD] + RT) or 24 months of goserelin (long-term ADT [LTAD] + RT). A total of 1,554 patients were entered. RT was 45 Gy to the pelvic nodes and 65 to 70 Gy to the prostate. Median follow-up of all survival patients is 11.31 and 11.27 years for the two arms.ResultsAt 10 years, the LTAD + RT group showed significant improvement over the STAD + RT group for all end points except overall survival: disease-free survival (13.2% v 22.5%; P < .0001), disease-specific survival (83.9% v 88.7%; P = .0042), local progression (22.2% v 12.3%; P < .0001), distant metastasis (22.8% v 14.8%; P < .0001), biochemical failure (68.1% v 51.9%; P ≤ .0001), and overall survival (51.6% v 53.9%, P = .36). One subgroup analyzed consisted of all cancers with a Gleason score of 8 to 10 cancers. An overall survival difference was observed (31.9% v 45.1%; P = .0061), as well as in all other end points herein.ConclusionLTAD as delivered in this study for the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer is superior to STAD for all end points except survival. A survival advantage for LTAD + RT in the treatment of locally advanced tumors with a Gleason score of 8 to 10 suggests that this should be the standard of treatment for these high-risk patients.

scholarly journals Anemia Is a Predictive Factor for Overall Survival Rate in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidekazu Tanaka ◽  
Taiki Ono ◽  
Yuki Manabe ◽  
Miki Kajima ◽  
Koya Fujimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung

Abstract Purpose: Anemia has been associated with poor prognosis in patients with cancer across several cancer types. It has been identified as a prognostic factor in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have undergone surgery or chemoradiotherapy. However, there are only a few reports that have evaluated the prognostic significance of anemia in patients with NSCLC undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Material and Methods: A total of 77 patients were enrolled this study. The pretreatment hemoglobin (Hb) levels, within 2 weeks before SBRT, were available for all patients. The median age of the participants (56 men, 21 women) was 80 (range, 50-90) years. The median Hb level was 12.8 (range, 7.8-18.3) g/dL. The median follow-up period was 24 (range, 1-87) months. Results: Local recurrence was observed in 8 (10.4%) cases during the follow-up period. The 1- and 2-year local control (LC) rates were 94.8 and 86.4%, respectively. Seventeen (22.1%) patients died during the follow-up period. The 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 93.1 and 85.2%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified anemia and body mass index as significant prognostic factors for predicting OS. On multivariate analysis, anemia was confirmed to be the only significant factor (p = 0.02469). Conclusion: Our data suggest that anemia is a prognostic factor for predicting the OS rate in patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with SBRT.

Oncological outcomes of 356 patients undergoing salvage focal ablative HIFU or cryotherapy following radiation failure.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5582-5582
Author(s):  
Deepika Reddy ◽  
Taimur T. Shah ◽  
Marieke van Son ◽  
Stephanie Guillaumier ◽  
Feargus Hosking-Jervis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Fistula Formation ◽  
Time To Failure ◽  
Ablative Therapy ◽  
Oncological Outcomes

5582 Background: Patients that have previously failed radiotherapy for prostate cancer is usually limited to systemic therapy due to morbidity from salvage prostatectomy. We reviewed the outcomes following focal salvage ablative therapy with HIFU or cryotherapy within the UK’s HEAT and ICE registries. Methods: 356 consecutive patients underwent focal ablative treatment after initial radiation treatment failure (28/1/2004-1/10/2019, 194 (54.5%) underwent HIFU (posterior recurrence) and 162 (45.5%) underwent cryotherapy (mostly anterior or T3b). Primary outcome was failure-free survival (FFS) defined as no systemic therapy, whole-gland treatment, metastases or prostate cancer-specific death. Secondary outcomes were adverse events and overall survival. Results: Median (IQR) age was 69years (65-73) and PSA (IQR) was 4.0ng/ml (1-7-7.2). Overall median (IQR) follow-up was 41.3 months (21.4-58.5). Quadrant ablation was performed in 128 (36.0%), hemi-ablation performed in 64 (18.0%), hockey-stick in 5 (1.4%) and 159 (43.8%) had unknown ablative patterns. Due to histological or MRI proven recurrence/residual disease, 31 (8.7%) underwent further focal salvage re-treatment. FFS (95%CI) at 3 and 6 years were 81% (76-87%) and 75% (68-83%) respectively. Median (IQR) time to failure was 15.5 months (19.7). Overall survival (95%CI) at 3 and 6 years were 97% (95-100%) and 88% (81-96%) respectively. Prostate-specific mortality was 2.8%. Overall 3 (0.8%) patients were managed for fistula formation, 16 (4.5%) were treated for UTIs. Conclusions: Salvage focal ablative therapy for radio-recurrent prostate cancer is safe and provides good short to medium-term oncological control. The FORECAST study is awaited to further determine oncological outcomes in this cohort.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Treatment for Melanoma Brain Metastases

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Mantas Janavicius ◽  
Nadezda Lachej ◽  
Giedre Anglickiene ◽  
Ieva Vincerzevskiene ◽  
Birute Brasiuniene
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Clinicopathological Parameters ◽  
Care Group ◽  
Modern Radiotherapy Technique

Background. Historically, melanoma with brain metastases has a poor prognosis. In this retrospective medical record review, we report basic clinicopathological parameters and the outcomes of patients with melanoma and brain metastases treated with different treatment modalities before the era of immunotherapy and modern radiotherapy technique. Methods. Patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with surgery, radiotherapy, and/or systemic therapy from 1998 to 2017. In our study, they were identified and stratified depending on treatment methods. Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of brain metastases to the death or last follow-up (2019 June 1st). Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method that was employed to calculate the hazard ratio. Results. Six (12%) of 50 patients are still alive as of the last follow-up. The median overall survival from the onset of brain metastases was 11 months. The longest survival time was observed in patients treated by surgery followed by radiotherapy, surgery followed by radiotherapy and systemic therapy, and also radiotherapy followed by systemic therapy. The shortest survival was observed in the best supportive care group and patients treated by systemic therapy only. Conclusions. Patients with brain metastases achieved better overall survival when treated by combined treatment modalities: surgery followed by radiotherapy (26.6 months overall survival), combining surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy (18.7 months overall survival), and also radiotherapy followed by systemic therapy (13.8 months overall survival).

Racial disparities in stage IV prostate cancer outcomes in the Veterans Affairs hospital system.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 199-199
Author(s):  
I. Al-Howaidi ◽  
L. Shatat ◽  
T. Tashi ◽  
W. Gonsalves ◽  
P. T. Silberstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Racial Disparities ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Hospital System ◽  
Significant Difference

199 Background: Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that African-American (AA) men with prostate cancer have lower overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates than Caucasian (CA) men with prostate cancer. We aim to assess whether racial disparities exist for prostate cancer within an equal access health care system like the Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals. Methods: A retrospective analysis of AA and CA with metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 1995 to 2007 via the Veterans Affairs Central Cancer Registry was conducted. Age, Race and type of treatment received were studied with respect to overall survival by using log-rank and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: A total of 8,195 patients with advanced prostate cancer were analyzed, majority of them where CA (66.32%), 30.8% were AA and 2.8% belonged to other races. The median survival for AA was 2.71 years, 2.88 years in CA and 4.02 years in other races (P value <0.0001). Subgroup analysis based on treatment modality used showed the following median survival rates in years: No treatment (CA: 1.73, AA: 1.39, other races: 3.79, P<0.816), Hormonal therapy alone (CA: 2.51,AA: 2.45, Others:3.72, P<0.022), Radiation therapy alone (CA: 2.2, AA: 2.7, Others: 2.26, P<0.832), combined hormone and radiation therapy (CA: 2.71, AA: 2.31, Others: 6.64, P<0.029). However when CA and AA survival were compared excluding other races there was no statistically significant difference in survival irrespective of type of therapy received. Conclusions: In advanced prostate cancer, AA and CA have uniformly poor prognosis. Type of therapy received did not influence the survival of both races. The numbers for other races is too small to make a definitive conclusion regarding their prognosis. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Impact of age at diagnosis on overall and disease-free survival in men with prostate cancer following conformal 3D radiation therapy

2012 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 722-727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Maggio ◽  
Rocco Panaia ◽  
Elisabetta Garibaldi ◽  
Sara Bresciani ◽  
Giuseppe Malinverni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Age At Diagnosis ◽  
Conformal Radiation Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
3D Conformal Radiation Therapy ◽  
Disease Free

Aims and background The impact of age on prostate cancer outcome has been controversial. The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of age on overall survival and disease-free survival in patients affected by prostate cancer when treated with 3D conformal radiation therapy. Methods and study design From 1999 to 2005, 1002 patients with T1–T3 prostate cancer were treated with 3D conformal radiation therapy, delivering a median dose of 75.6, 66.6 and 45 Gy to the prostate, seminal vesicles and pelvic nodes (if necessary), respectively. Patients were divided into four groups (<65, 65–70, 70–75, >75 years) according to age at diagnosis. The relationship between age and both overall survival and disease-free survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and the comparison between curves was performed by the logrank test. ROC analysis allowed assessment of the best age cutoff. Results Mean age was 71 ± 6 years (median, 72). Median and mean follow-up was 71.4 and 69 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in the distribution of disease risk between age groups. Analysis demonstrated that older age is a strong positive predictor of survival (odds ratio for stratified patients older than 70 years was <1). In fact, at the 90 month follow-up, overall survival and disease-free survival varied with age, increasing from 85% to 95% and from 78% to 94%, respectively. ROC curve analysis yielded a cutoff age value discriminating overall survival and disease-free survival of 72 years. Conclusions Age is a strong positive predictor of overall survival and disease-free survival, playing a protective role for stratified patients up to 72 years of age.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document