scholarly journals 506 IGNYTE: an open-label, multicenter, phase 1/2 (Ph 1/2) clinical trial of RP1 ± nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A538-A538
Author(s):  
Mark Middleton ◽  
Mohammed Milhem ◽  
Francesca Aroldi ◽  
Joseph Sacco ◽  
Ari VanderWalde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
List Type ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Simplex Virus

BackgroundRP1 is an enhanced potency oncolytic HSV-1 which expresses a fusogenic glycoprotein (GALV-GP R-) and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF).1 In pre-clinical studies, RP1 demonstrated potent GALV-GP R-enhanced anti-tumor activity and immunogenic cell death. This Phase 1/2 (Ph 1/2) study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RP1 ± nivolumab (nivo) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors, including pts whose disease failed prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and has reported promising interim data in a number of tumor types including cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) and anti-PD1 failed melanoma to date.2MethodsThis is a multi-center, first-in-human, open label, multi-cohort, non-randomized Ph1 study of RP1 alone and combined with nivo followed by Ph2 in combination with nivo in pts with recurrent advanced solid tumors including those that progressed after prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. The Ph 1 monotherapy dose escalation (n=14) and RP-1 combination expansion (n=22) cohorts are fully enrolled. Approximately 260 pts are expected to be enrolled in the ongoing Ph 2 portion across five cohorts; melanoma (n=30, enrollment complete), non-melanoma skin cancer (n=45, to include 15 pts with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 failed disease), anti-PD-1 failed MSI-H/dMMR tumors (n=30), anti-PD-1/PD-L1-failed non-small-cell lung cancer (n=30) and a registration-directed cohort in anti-PD-1 failed cutaneous melanoma (n=125). Pts in the Ph 2 portion receive up to 10 mL of RP1 intratumorally into one or more superficial or deep seated/visceral lesions at the recommended Ph 2 dose (1x10^6 PFU/mL × 1 followed by 1x10^7 PFU/mL × 7, Q2W). Following the first dose of RP1, nivo (240 mg IV Q2W for 4 months then 480 mg IV Q4W for up to 2 years) is subsequently administered in combination. Pts may receive up to 8 additional doses of RP1 if they meet protocol-specified criteria. Tumor assessments are performed Q8W. The primary objectives of the Ph 2 part of the study are to assess the safety, tolerability, and overall response rate (ORR) of RP1 in combination with nivo, by independent review for the anti-PD1 failed melanoma cohort. Secondary objectives include duration of response, complete response rate, disease control rate, PFS, 1-year and 2-year survival rates. Exploratory objectives include biodistribution and shedding analysis of RP1 and biomarker studies, including analyses of tumor biopsies and blood samples. Enrollment is currently ongoing in the UK and US, with additional sites in the EU (including France and Spain) are expected to open in 2021.Trial RegistrationNCT03767348ReferencesThomas S, Kuncheria L, Roulstone V, Kyula JN, Mansfield D, Bommareddy PK, Smith H, Kaufman HL, Harrington KJ, Coffin RS. Development of a new fusion-enhanced oncolytic immunotherapy platform based on herpes simplex virus type 1. J Immunother Cancer 2019;7(1):214.Coffin R, Astley-Sparke P, and Middleton M (2021, June 3rd). Retrieved from https://ir.replimune.com/static-files/f4fe3349-e082-4d41-94a1-106ce7e78a23Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by institutional review board or the local ethics committee at each site. Informed consent was obtained from patients prior to enrollment.

scholarly journals 417 Design and rationale of a phase 1 study evaluating AMG 256, a novel, targeted, IL-21 receptor agonist and anti-PD-1 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A443-A443
Author(s):  
Gregory Durm ◽  
Sophia Frentzas ◽  
Erik Rasmussen ◽  
Saltanat Najmi ◽  
Nooshin Sadraei
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Immunity ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
List Type ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Drug Study ◽  
Interleukin 21

BackgroundCheckpoint inhibitors are a promising therapy for patients with solid tumors; however, many patients require additional therapies to maximize clinical benefit or overcome resistance.1 The type-1 cytokine interleukin-21 (IL-21) is a promising candidate for combination and has shown clinical activity in melanoma and renal cell cancer.2 IL-21 has also shown improved efficacy when combined with anti-programmed death (PD)-1 antibodies in preclinical models.3 4 AMG 256 is a mutated IL-21 cytokine fused to an anti-PD-1 antibody to combine IL-21 pathway stimulation with checkpoint inhibition—a strategy that is designed to prime and extend the activity of cytotoxic and memory T cells and induce anti-tumor immunity. This first-in-human (FIH) study will assess safety, tolerability, and estimated dosing of AMG 256 monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.MethodsThis is a FIH, multicenter, non-randomized, open-label, phase 1 study (NCT04362748) of AMG 256 in patients with advanced solid tumors. The planned sample size is approximately 100 patients in two parts: part 1 will evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), part 2 will evaluate the MTD determined in part 1 to further characterize the safety profile and preliminary tumor response. AMG 256 will be delivered by intravenous (IV) infusion. Enrollment criteria include adults with life expectancy of > 3 months, ECOG performance status ≤ 2, histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors not amenable to curative treatment with surgery or radiation, and at least one measurable lesion ≥ 10 mm that has not undergone biopsy within 3 months of screening scan. Exclusion criteria include primary brain tumor, untreated or symptomatic brain metastases, currently receiving treatment in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 28 days since ending treatment on another investigational device or drug study, history of solid organ transplantation or major surgery within 28 days of study day 1, live vaccine therapy within 4 weeks prior to study day 1, and active infection requiring oral or IV therapy. The primary endpoints are incidence of dose-limiting toxicities and adverse events, MTD, and recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives will evaluate PK parameters, preliminary antitumor activity (objective response, duration of response, progression-free survival, disease control rate, duration of stable disease, overall survival), and immunogenicity of AMG 256 via incidence of anti-AMG 256 antibodies.ResultsN/AConclusionsN/AAcknowledgements• The authors thank the investigators, patients, and study staff who are contributing to this study.• The study was sponsored and funded by Amgen Inc. • Medical writing support was provided by Christopher Nosala (Amgen Inc.).Trial RegistrationNCT04362748Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by all institutional ethics boards.ReferencesKluger HM, Tawbi HA, Ascierto ML, et al. Defining tumor resistance to PD-1 pathway blockade: recommendations from the first meeting of the SITC Immunotherapy Resistance Taskforce. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8:e000398.Thompson JA, Curti BD, Redman BG, et al. Phase I study of recombinant interleukin-21 in patients with metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:2034–2039.Lewis KE, Selby MJ, Masters G, et al. Interleukin-21 combined with PD-1 or CTLA-4 blockade enhances antitumor immunity in mouse tumor models. Oncoimmunology. 2017;7:e1377873.Shen S, Sckisel G, Sahoo A, et al. Engineered IL-21 cytokine muteins fused to anti-PD-1 antibodies can improve CD8+ T cell function and anti-tumor immunity. Front Immunol 2020;11:832.

scholarly journals A phase 1, open-label, drug–drug interaction study of rucaparib with rosuvastatin and oral contraceptives in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingxiang Liao ◽  
Krzysztof G. Jeziorski ◽  
Monika Tomaszewska-Kiecana ◽  
István Láng ◽  
Marek Jasiówka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Oral Contraceptives ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Drug Drug Interaction

Abstract Purpose This study aimed at evaluating the effect of rucaparib on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin and oral contraceptives in patients with advanced solid tumors and the safety of rucaparib with and without coadministration of rosuvastatin or oral contraceptives. Methods Patients received single doses of oral rosuvastatin 20 mg (Arm A) or oral contraceptives ethinylestradiol 30 µg + levonorgestrel 150 µg (Arm B) on days 1 and 19 and continuous doses of rucaparib 600 mg BID from day 5 to 23. Serial blood samples were collected with and without rucaparib for pharmacokinetic analysis. Results Thirty-six patients (n = 18 each arm) were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of study drug. In the drug–drug interaction analysis (n = 15 each arm), the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of maximum concentration (Cmax) with and without rucaparib was 1.29 for rosuvastatin, 1.09 for ethinylestradiol, and 1.19 for levonorgestrel. GMR of area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to last quantifiable measurement (AUC0–last) was 1.34 for rosuvastatin, 1.43 for ethinylestradiol, and 1.56 for levonorgestrel. There was no increase in frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) when rucaparib was given with either of the probe drugs. In both arms, most TEAEs were mild in severity and considered unrelated to study treatment. Conclusion Rucaparib 600 mg BID weakly increased the plasma exposure to rosuvastatin or oral contraceptives. Rucaparib safety profile when coadministered with rosuvastatin or oral contraceptives was consistent with that of rucaparib monotherapy. Dose adjustments of rosuvastatin and oral contraceptives are not necessary when coadministered with rucaparib. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03954366; Date of registration May 17, 2019.

Phase 1 open-label study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of dilpacimab in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
pp. molcanther.0985.2020
Author(s):  
Michael S. Gordon ◽  
John Nemunaitis ◽  
Minal Barve ◽  
Zev A. Wainberg ◽  
Erika P. Hamilton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Label Study

Phase I open-label, dose escalation of YH003, an anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody in combination with toripalimab (anti-PD-1 mAb) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2580-2580
Author(s):  
Jermaine Coward ◽  
Afaf Abed ◽  
Adnan Nagrial ◽  
Ben Markman
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Label Dose ◽  
Febrile Episodes ◽  
Antigen Presenting

2580 Background: YH003, a recombinant, humanized agonistic anti-CD40 IgG2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) specifically recognizes and agonizes CD40 on the antigen-presenting cells to enhance immune responses. Preclinical data have shown potent anti-cancer activity when combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies. Methods: This is an ongoing phase 1 dose-escalation study. Patients with advanced solid tumors receive YH003 by IV administration Q3W as monotherapy at 0.03 to 3.0 mg/kg for the first cycle (21 days) then in combination with Toripalimab at 240 mg Q3W for the 4 subsequent cycles in an accelerated “3+3” design. The safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy data will be analyzed. Results: As of 31 Dec 2020 data cutoff, 9 patients (pts) were enrolled and treated at 0.03 mg/kg (n = 3), 0.1mg/kg (n = 3), and 0.3mg/kg (n = 3). The median age was 63 years (range 33-68). Baseline ECOG scores were 0 (7 pts) and 1 (2 pts) with a median of 2 prior lines therapy (range 1-7). 5 pts had received prior immunotherapy (PD-1/PD-L1 or PD-1+CTLA-4). As of data cutoff, no dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed. No Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were reported. Four drug related AEs were reported including one Grade 1 (G1) choroidal thickening (related to YH003) at 0.03 mg/kg, one G1 fatigue (related to YH003) at 0.1 mg/kg, two G1 febrile episodes (one related to YH003 and the other related to combination treatment) at 0.3 mg/kg. Among 5 patients assessable for response, there were 2 SD (one with anti-PDL1 refractory Merkel cell carcinoma at 0.03 mg/kg and one with anti-PD1 refractory NSCLC at 0.1 mg/kg) and 1 PR with anti-PD1/anti-CTLA4 refractory ocular melanoma at 0.1 mg/kg. Conclusions: YH003 was well tolerated up to 0.3 mg/kg dose levels when combined with Toripalimab and has shown encouraging antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT04481009.

A phase 1, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation, safety, pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic study of Q702 with a cohort expansion at the RP2D in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2673-TPS2673
Author(s):  
Angela Tatiana Alistar ◽  
Anthony B. El-Khoueiry ◽  
Devalingam Mahalingam ◽  
Monica M. Mita ◽  
Hwankyu Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Cell Activation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Innate Immune ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Label Dose

TPS2673 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors directly targeting T cell activation have been successfully used in the treatment of various malignancies, nevertheless, the durable ORRs are low for certain indications. The low ORRs have been attributed to the immune suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), composed of innate immune suppressive components such as tumor associated macrophages (TAM) and myeloid-derived suppression cells (MDSC). The potential contributions of innate immune modulation to anti-tumor immunity, suggest the need for the novel strategies to elicit a more efficient/robust immune response against the targeted malignant cells. Axl, Mer and CSF1R receptor tyrosine kinases play vital roles in promoting an immune suppressive TME by affecting TAM and MDSC populations and by decreasing antigen presentation on tumor cells. Q702 is a novel Axl/Mer/CSF1R inhibitor, able to modulate the TAM and MDSC population leading to CD8+ T cell activation and to increase antigen presentation of the tumor cells in syngeneic animal models. Q702, as a monotherapy, shows significant tumor growth inhibition in multiple syngeneic tumor models, and demonstrates synergistic effects with anti-PD-1 treatment particularly in high myeloid containing tumor models. Interestingly, intermittent administration of Q702 monotherapy demonstrates a more favorable immune cell population changes, possibly through preventing immune exhaustion secondary to negative feedback with continuous activation. These results suggest that Q702 monotherapy or in combination with existing therapies have a good potential to become a novel treatment strategy for patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: “A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-label, Dose-Escalation, Safety, Pharmacodynamic, Pharmacokinetic Study of Q702 with a Cohort Expansion at the RP2D in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. (NCT04648254)” is open and recruiting patients at 4 US investigative sites. Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic solid tumors, that have progressed following SOC or for which there is no SOC which confers clinical benefit are being enrolled in this study. The study follows a standard dose escalation. The study will enroll up to 78 patients. The primary endpoint is to establish safety, PK profile and define the recommended phase 2 dose. The secondary and exploratory endpoints include establishing pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship, potential biomarkers and preliminary anti-tumor activity. Clinical trial information: NCT04648254.

scholarly journals Tislelizumab in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors: an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000437
Author(s):  
Lin Shen ◽  
Jun Guo ◽  
Qingyuan Zhang ◽  
Hongming Pan ◽  
Ying Yuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Dose Verification ◽  
Open Label

BackgroundTislelizumab is an investigational, humanized, IgG4 monoclonal antibody with high affinity and binding specificity for programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) that was engineered to minimize binding to FcγR on macrophages in order to abrogate antibody-dependent phagocytosis, a mechanism of T-cell clearance and potential resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy.MethodsThe purpose of this phase 1/2, open-label, non-comparative study was to examine the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of tislelizumab in adult (≥18 years) Chinese patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced solid tumors with measurable disease. The phase 1 portion of the study consisted of a dose-verification study and a pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy; phase 2 was an indication-expansion study including 11 solid tumor cohorts. Patients previously treated with therapies targeting PD-1 or its ligand, programmed cell death ligand-1 were excluded. During dose-verification, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were monitored; safety and tolerability were examined and the previously determined recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was verified. The primary endpoint of phase 2 was investigator-assessed objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1.ResultsAs of December 1, 2018, 300 patients were treated with tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks (Q3W). Median duration of follow-up was 8.1 months (range 0.2–21.9). No DLTs were reported during the phase 1 dose-verification study and the RP2D was confirmed to be 200 mg intravenously Q3W. Most treatment-related adverse events (62%) were grade 1 or 2, with the most common being anemia (n=70; 23%) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (n=67; 22%). Of the 251 efficacy evaluable patients, 45 (18%) achieved a confirmed clinical response, including one patient from the PK substudy who achieved a complete response. Median duration of response was not reached for all except the nasopharyngeal carcinoma cohort (8.3 months). Antitumor responses were observed in multiple tumor types.ConclusionsTislelizumab was generally well tolerated among Chinese patients. Antitumor activity was observed in patients with multiple solid tumors.Trial registration numberCTR20160872.

First-in-human phase I study of an oral HSP90 inhibitor, TAS-116, in advanced solid tumors.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2546-2546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriko Yanagitani ◽  
Atsushi Horiike ◽  
Satoru Kitazono ◽  
Fumiyoshi Ohyanagi ◽  
Shunsuke Kondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Repeated Administration ◽  
Hsp90 Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Hsp70 Protein ◽  
Flat Dose ◽  
The Uk

2546 Background: TAS-116 is an oral non-ansamycin, non-purine, and non-resorcinol highly selective inhibitor of HSP90α/β. The objective of this FIH study was to determine the MTD and investigate the safety, tolerability, PK, PD (HSP70 protein levels in PBMCs), and antitumor activity of TAS-116. Methods: The study is being conducted in Japan and the UK. Patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating doses of TAS-116 once daily (QD) with an accelerated titration design. After the MTD was determined, safety and tolerability of 5 days on / 2 days off per week administration (QDx5) at the MTD in QD was explored. In parallel, the MTD with every other day administration (QOD) was evaluated by using a 3 + 3 design. Results: As of 20 September 2016, 52 patients were enrolled. TAS-116 was evaluated at doses of 4.8 to 150.5 mg/m2/day in the QD schedule and doses of 107.5 to 295.0 mg/m2/day in the QOD schedule. The MTD was 107.5 mg/m2/day with QD and 210.7 mg/m2/day with QOD. QDx5 at the MTD in QD using a flat dose of 160 mg was evaluated. The most common adverse events in all regimens were gastrointestinal disorders and increased creatinine. DLTs were observed in 4 patients in QD (night blindness, visual disorder, AST/ ALT/gamma-GTP elevations, and anorexia) and in 2 patients in QOD (platelet count decreased, febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and septic shock). Reversible eye disorders were observed in all schedules, but those observed in QDx5 were limited to grade 1. The PK level demonstrated dose proportionality without unexpected accumulation under repeated administration. Dose-related HSP70 induction of PBMCs was observed. As of 20 September 2016, three confirmed durable PRs by RECIST were observed (239 days in GIST and 173 days in NSCLC with QD; 293 + days in NSCLC with QOD). PR and SD ≥ 12 weeks were observed in 15 out of 47 patients. Conclusions: TAS-116 had an acceptable safety profile under all schedules, especially QDx5. Preliminary antitumor activity was demonstrated with evidence of target engagement. Dose expansion at the MTD in this phase 1 study and the phase 2 study in patients with GIST are ongoing. Parts of this study will be expanded to the US with an amended study protocol. Clinical trial information: NCT02965885.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document