Fixed-duration venetoclax-obinutuzumab for previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Follow-up of efficacy and safety results from the multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III CLL14 trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8027-8027
Author(s):  
Othman Al-Sawaf ◽  
Can Zhang ◽  
Maneesh Tandon ◽  
Arijit Sinha ◽  
Anna Maria Fink ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Fixed Duration ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Minimal Residual

8027 Background: The CLL14 trial demonstrated significant improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) with fixed-duration venetoclax-obinutuzumab (VenG) as compared to chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (ClbG) in patients with previously untreated CLL and coexisting conditions. Here, we report follow-up data on safety and efficacy. Methods: Patients with previously untreated CLL and coexisting conditions were randomized 1:1 to receive 12 cycles of venetoclax with 6 cycles of obinutuzumab or 12 cycles of chlorambucil with 6 cycles of obinutuzumab. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Key secondary endpoints were response rates, rates of minimal residual disease (measured every 6 months up to 5 years after last patient enrolment) and overall survival. Follow-up is ongoing but all patients are off study treatment. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02242942. Results: Of the 432 enrolled patients, 216 were randomly assigned to receive VenG and 216 to receive ClbG. After a median follow-up of 39.6 months (interquartile range 36.75 - 43.04), progression-free survival continued to be superior for VenG as compared to ClbG (median not reached vs 35.6 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.31 [0.22-0.44], p < 0.001). At 3 years, the estimated progression-free survival rate was 81.9% in the VenG arm and 49.5% in the ClbG arm. This benefit was consistently observed across all clinical and biological risk groups, including patients with TP53 mutation/deletion and unmutated IGHV status. Of note, PFS was also significantly longer for VenG treated patients with mutated IGHV status. Assessment of minimal residual disease 18 months after end of treatment showed that 47.2% of patients in the VenG arm had undetectable (u) uMRD ( < 10−4), 13% had low (L)-MRD (≥ 10−4 and < 10−2) and 7.9% high (H)-MRD (≥ 10−2), compared to 7.4% uMRD, 17.1% L-MRD, 26.9% H-MRD in the ClbG arm. No difference has been observed (HR 1.027, 95% CI 0.602-1.753, p = 0.921) for overall survival; median overall survival has not been reached in either group. Second primary malignancies were reported in 36 (17%) patients in the VenG arm and 22 (10.3%) in the ClbG arm. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: The results suggest that the superior efficacy and deep remissions after fixed-duration VenG are maintained during extended follow-up, and show the long-term benefits of 12 cycles of VenG across all known risk categories. Clinical trial information: NCT02242942 .

scholarly journals Final Results of the IELSG-19 Randomized Trial of Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma: Improved Event-Free and Progression-Free Survival With Rituximab Plus Chlorambucil Versus Either Chlorambucil or Rituximab Monotherapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (17) ◽  
pp. 1905-1912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele Zucca ◽  
Annarita Conconi ◽  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Reda Bouabdallah ◽  
Alessandra Tucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Lymphoid Tissue ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Final Sample ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
To Receive

Purpose There is no consensus on the optimal systemic treatment of patients with extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. The IELSG-19 phase III study, to our knowledge, was the first such study to address the question of first-line treatment in a randomized trial. Patients and Methods Eligible patients were initially randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either chlorambucil monotherapy (6 mg/m2/d orally on weeks 1 to 6, 9 to 10, 13 to 14, 17 to 18, and 21 to 22) or a combination of chlorambucil (same schedule as above) and rituximab (375 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 13, 17, and 21). After the planned enrollment of 252 patients, the protocol was amended to continue with a three-arm design (1:1:6 ratio), with a new arm that included rituximab alone (same schedule as the combination arm) and with a final sample size of 454 patients. The main end point was event-free survival (EFS). Analysis of chlorambucil versus the combination arm was performed and reported separately before any analysis of the third arm. Results At a median follow-up of 7.4 years, addition of rituximab to chlorambucil led to significantly better EFS (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.77). EFS at 5 years was 51% (95% CI, 42 to 60) with chlorambucil alone, 50% (95% CI, 42 to 59) with rituximab alone, and 68% (95% CI, 60 to 76) with the combination ( P = .0009). Progression-free survival was also significantly better with the combination ( P = .0119). Five-year overall survival was approximately 90% in each arm. All treatments were well tolerated. No unexpected toxicities were recorded. Conclusion Rituximab in combination with chlorambucil demonstrated superior efficacy in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma; however, improvements in EFS and progression-free survival did not translate into longer overall survival.

Detection and impact of minimal residual disease on outcome of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

2012 ◽  
Vol 153 (41) ◽  
pp. 1622-1628
Author(s):  
Márk Plander ◽  
Judit Skrapits ◽  
Tünde Bozsó ◽  
Tamás Szendrei ◽  
János László Iványi
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Minimal Residual

Introduction: Minimal residual disease is associated with longer overall survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Aim: The aim of the authors was to determine the clinical significance of remission and minimal residual disease on the survival of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Methods: Data from 42 first-line treated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia were analyzed. Minimal residual disease was determined by flow cytometry. Results: Overall response and complete remission was achieved in 91%, 86%, 100% and 87%, 0%, 60% of patients with fludarabine-based combinations, single-agent fludarabine and cyclophosphamide + vincristin + prednisolone regimen, respectively. Minimal residual disease eradication was feasible only with fludarabine-based combinations in 60% of these cases. The ratio of minimal residual disease was 0.5% on average. During a median follow-up period lasting 30 months, the overall survival of patients with fludarabine-resistant disease proved to be significantly shorter (p = 0.04), while complete remission without minimal residual disease was associated with significantly longer progression free survival (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Only fludarabine-based combinations were able to eradicate minimal residual disease in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Complete remission without minimal residual disease may predict longer progression free survival in these patients. Orv. Hetil., 2012, 153, 1622–1628.

Favorable Impact of Post-ASCT Consolidative Immunotherapy with RITUXIMAB, rINF-a2b and rIL2 on Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival in Advanced Stage or Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Results of a Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3066-3066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Richard Eveillard ◽  
Jean-Christophe Ianotto ◽  
Adrian Tempescul ◽  
Gaelle Guillerm ◽  
Florence Dalbiès ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Subcutaneous Injections ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 3066 Introduction: Advanced stage III/IV or relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) can hardly be cured with conventional chemotherapy and patients, even after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), experience innumerable relapse events occurring at decreasing progression-free intervals. Important progress was made since the introduction of RITUXIMAB as part of frontline chemoimmunotherapy or as maintenance after frontline treatment with or without ASCT. But, whatever the policy applied, no plateau is observed regarding overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Disease relapse, even in patients with documented complete remission (CR), is thought to be induced both by resistant minimal residual tumor cells and the lack of immunocompetent mechanisms to contain or eliminate them. Thus, it has been postulated that post-ASCT consolidative immunotherapy might eradicate minimal residual disease, based on antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) mechanism, and have a favorable impact on relapse rate and even OS. This view has led to a considerable interest in immunotherapy as a promising therapeutic line to restore and enhance the impaired anti-tumor immune surveillance in the context of post-ASCT low tumor burden. Purpose: We conducted a phase II study to compare OS and PFS between patients with advanced or relapsed/refractory FL receiving consolidative immunotherapy combining recombinant interleukine-2 (rIL-2), recombinant interferon- α-2b (rINF- α-2b) and RITUXIMAB after ASCT, with the aim of controlling minimal residual disease, and other counterparts with FL receiving no further treatment after ASCT. Patients and Methods: From August, 1995, to October, 2009, 139 patients with FL were autografted in complete remission ≥1 or partial remission. Of these patients, 66 were considered eligible for immunotherapy. On adequate post-ASCT hematologic reconstitution, they received 4 weekly IV injections of RITUXIMAB administered on an outpatient fashion. This was followed by a home-based program of subcutaneous injections of rIL2 (6 million UI × 3 / week in 1st cycle; 9 million × 3 / week in 2d) and rINF- α-2b (1.5 million UI × 3 / week in 1st cycle; 3 million × 3 / week in 2d) administered over two 7-week cycles. These two cycles were separated by a two-week free interval. The other 73 patients did not receive any additional treatment after ASCT and served as controls. Results: The two groups were comparable regarding demographic characteristics, disease profile and treatment course, except that the control group had significantly less transformed FL (p =0.0156) and a higher mean treatment line number (p =0.018). Median OS and PFS were not reached in either the study group or the control group. OS, initially not different between the 2 groups (p =0.21), was found significantly higher in the study group after a cut-off follow-up time point of 86.6 months (p =0.017). A significantly higher PFS was also noted in favor of the study group over the control group (p =0.0131). With a median follow-up of 60 months (10 to 136) in the study group and of 82 months (0.7 to 174) in the control group, survival rate was 90.9% and 71.2%, respectively (p= 0.0034) and the overall relapse rate was 19.7% (13 patients) and 41.1% (30 patients), respectively (p= 0.0064). Adverse events were generally mild, consisting essentially of fever and chills with the rIL-2 and rINF- α-2b subcutaneous injections (rapidly controlled with PARACETAMOL), fatigue, grade 2 abnormal liver function tests in one third of patients and grade 2 or 3 cytopenias (anemia or neutropenia) in 40% of patients. Conclusion: These results confirm that post-ASCT immunotherapy with rIL2, rINF- α-2b and RITUXIMAB has a statistically significant impact on OS and PFS. In view of its tolerability, it appears to be quite feasible and safe and might be seen as a promising line of treatment designed for eradicating post-ASCT minimal residual disease and worth being tested within the frame of a randomized trial for validation as an essential step in the treatment algorithm of FL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Efficacy of avelumab plus axitinib (A + Ax) versus sunitinib (S) by number of IMDC risk factors and tumor sites at baseline in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Extended follow-up results from JAVELIN Renal 101.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 302-302
Author(s):  
Yoshihiko Tomita ◽  
Robert J. Motzer ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Hideaki Miyake ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
To Receive

302 Background: In the phase III JAVELIN Renal 101 trial (NCT02684006), A + Ax demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) benefit across IMDC risk groups (favorable, intermediate, and poor) vs S in patients with previously untreated aRCC. Here we report efficacy of A + Ax vs S by number of IMDC risk factors (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4-6) and target tumor sites (1, 2, 3, and ≥4) at baseline from the second interim analysis of overall survival (OS). Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive A 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 wk + Ax 5 mg orally twice daily or S 50 mg orally once daily for 4 wk (6-wk cycle). PFS and ORR per independent central review (RECIST 1.1) and OS were assessed. Results: At data cut-off (Jan 2019), median (m) follow-up for OS and PFS was 19.3 vs 19.2 mo and 16.8 vs 15.2 mo for the A + Ax vs S arm, respectively. The table shows OS, PFS, and ORR by number of IMDC risk factors and target tumor sites at baseline. A + Ax generally demonstrated efficacy benefit vs S across subgroups. Conclusions: With extended follow-up, A + Ax generally demonstrated efficacy benefit vs S across the number of IMDC risk factors and tumor sites at baseline in aRCC. OS was still immature; follow-up for the final analysis is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02684006 . [Table: see text]

Efficacy of Melphalan and Prednisone Plus Thalidomide in Patients Older Than 75 Years With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: IFM 01/01 Trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (22) ◽  
pp. 3664-3670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyrille Hulin ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Philippe Rodon ◽  
Brigitte Pegourie ◽  
Lotfi Benboubker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Until recently, melphalan and prednisone were the standards of care in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. The addition of thalidomide to this combination demonstrated a survival benefit for patients age 65 to 75 years. This randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial investigated the efficacy of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in patients older than 75 years with newly diagnosed myeloma. Patients and Methods Between April 2002 and December 2006, 232 previously untreated patients with myeloma, age 75 years or older, were enrolled and 229 were randomly assigned to treatment. All patients received melphalan (0.2 mg/kg/d) plus prednisone (2 mg/kg/d) for 12 courses (day 1 to 4) every 6 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg/d of oral thalidomide (n = 113) or placebo (n = 116), continuously for 72 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. Results After a median follow-up of 47.5 months, overall survival was significantly longer in patients who received melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide compared with those who received melphalan and prednisone plus placebo (median, 44.0 v 29.1 months; P = .028). Progression-free survival was significantly prolonged in the melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide group (median, 24.1 v 18.5 months; P = .001). Two adverse events were significantly increased in the melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide group: grade 2 to 4 peripheral neuropathy (20% v 5% in the melphalan and prednisone plus placebo group; P < .001) and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (23% v 9%; P = .003). Conclusion This trial confirms the superiority of the combination melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide over melphalan and prednisone alone for prolonging survival in very elderly patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Toxicity was acceptable.

Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone-Thalidomide Followed by Maintenance With Bortezomib-Thalidomide Compared With Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone for Initial Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Updated Follow-Up and Improved Survival

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 634-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Davide Rossi ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) has improved overall survival in multiple myeloma. This randomized trial compared VMP plus thalidomide (VMPT) induction followed by bortezomib-thalidomide maintenance (VMPT-VT) with VMP in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Patients and Methods We randomly assigned 511 patients who were not eligible for transplantation to receive VMPT-VT (nine 5-week cycles of VMPT followed by 2 years of VT maintenance) or VMP (nine 5-week cycles without maintenance). Results In the initial analysis with a median follow-up of 23 months, VMPT-VT improved complete response rate from 24% to 38% and 3-year progression-free-survival (PFS) from 41% to 56% compared with VMP. In this analysis, median follow-up was 54 months. The median PFS was significantly longer with VMPT-VT (35.3 months) than with VMP (24.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; P < .001). The time to next therapy was 46.6 months in the VMPT-VT group and 27.8 months in the VMP group (HR, 0.52; P < .001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was greater with VMPT-VT (61%) than with VMP (51%; HR, 0.70; P = .01). Survival from relapse was identical in both groups (HR, 0.92; P = .63). In the VMPT-VT group, the most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse events included neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (22%), peripheral neuropathy (11%), and cardiologic events (11%). All of these, except for thrombocytopenia, were significantly more frequent in the VMPT-VT patients. Conclusion Bortezomib and thalidomide significantly improved OS in multiple myeloma patients not eligible for transplantation.

Eradication of Minimal Residual Disease in B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia After Alemtuzumab Therapy Is Associated With Prolonged Survival

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (13) ◽  
pp. 2971-2979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Moreton ◽  
Ben Kennedy ◽  
Guy Lucas ◽  
Michael Leach ◽  
Saad M.B. Rassam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Group Response ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Purpose To test whether eradication of minimal residual disease (MRD) in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) by alemtuzumab is associated with a prolongation of treatment-free and overall survival. Patients and Methods Ninety-one previously treated patients with CLL (74 men and 17 women; median age, 58 years [range, 32 to 75 years]; 44 were refractory to purine analogs) received a median of 9 weeks of alemtuzumab treatment between 1996 and 2003. Regular bone marrow assessments by MRD flow cytometry were performed with the aim of eradicating detectable MRD (< 1 CLL cell in 105 normal cells). Results Responses according to National Cancer Institute-sponsored working group response criteria were complete remission (CR) in 32 patients (36%), partial remission (PR) in 17 patients (19%), and no response (NR) in 42 patients (46%). Twenty-two (50%) of 44 purine analog-refractory patients responded to alemtuzumab. Detectable CLL was eradicated from the blood and marrow in 18 patients (20%). Median survival was significantly longer in MRD-negative patients compared with those achieving an MRD-positive CR, PR, or NR. Patients achieving an MRD-negative CR had a longer treatment-free survival than patients with MRD-positive CRs, PR, or NR: MRD-negative CRs, not reached; MRD-positive CRs, 20 months; PRs, 13 months; NR, 6 months (P < .0001). Overall survival for the 18 patients with MRD-negative remissions was 84% at 60 months. Eight (47%) of the MRD-negative patients converted to MRD positivity at a median of 28 months. Conclusion MRD-negative remission in CLL is achievable with alemtuzumab, leading to an improved overall and treatment-free survival.

scholarly journals Clinical implications of loss of bone marrow minimal residual disease negativity in multiple myeloma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meera Mohan ◽  
Samantha Kendrick ◽  
Aniko Szabo ◽  
Naveen K Yarlagadda ◽  
Dinesh Atwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Clinical Relapse ◽  
Landmark Analyses ◽  
Minimal Residual

Multiple myeloma (MM) patients frequently attain a bone marrow (BM) minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity status in response to treatment. We identified 568 patients who achieved BM MRD negativity following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and maintenance combination therapy with an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. BM MRD was evaluated by next generation flow cytometry (sensitivity of 10-5 cells) at 3 to 6 months intervals. With a median follow up of 9.9 years from diagnosis (range, 0.4 - 30.9), 61% of patients maintained MRD negativity, while 39% experienced MRD conversion at a median of 6.3 years (range, 1.4 - 25). The highest risk of MRD conversion occurred within the first 5 years after treatment and was observed more often in patients with abnormal metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities (95%vs. 84%; P = 0.001). MRD conversion was associated with a high risk of relapse and preceded it by a median of 1.0 year (range, 0 - 4.9). However, 27% of MRD conversion positive patients had not yet experienced a clinical relapse with a median follow-up of 9.3 years (range, 2.2 - 21.2). Landmark analyses using time from ASCT revealed patients with MRD conversion during the first 3 years had an inferior overall and progression-free survival compared to patients with sustained MRD negativity. MRD conversion correctly predicted relapse in 70%, demonstrating the utility of serial BM MRD assessment to complement standard laboratory and imaging to make informed salvage therapy decisions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document