Tolerability of single agent nivolumab in cancer patients—A meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15146-e15146
Author(s):  
Judy Huang ◽  
Alejandro Ramon Carvajal ◽  
Shenhong Wu
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Discontinuation Rate ◽  
Relative Risks ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
American Society

e15146 Background: Nivolumab, a PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, is being widely utilized in a number of cancers as a single agent. Adverse events, including those that are immune mediated, have been reported that resulted in discontinuation of the drug. We conducted a meta-analysis of published clinical trials to further investigate the tolerability of nivolumab in cancer patients. Methods: Databases, including PubMed and abstracts presented at American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meetings from 2015 to December 2019 were searched to identify relevant studies. This included randomized controlled trials and single arm trials that reported a discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Incidences and relative risks were calculated based on the heterogeneity of included studies. Results: Seventeen studies published between 2015 and 2019 were selected, which included a total of 4216 patients. Overall, the discontinuation rate of nivolumab due to adverse events was 6.7% (95% CI 4.7-9.5%). The rate varied significantly with the type of cancer (p < 0.001). The lowest discontinuation rate was in NSCLC of 2.1% (95% CI 1.3-2.3%), and the highest discontinuation rate was in melanoma of 15.2% (95% CI 6.8-30.6%). In addition, significantly higher intolerability is associated with the fixed dose of nivolumab at 240 mg than 3 mg/kg (P = 0.004). In comparison with chemotherapy controls, the intolerability in the nivolumab group was not significantly different, with a relative risk of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.36-2.6). Conclusions: The intolerability of nivolumab as monotherapy may be similar to chemotherapy, and can be improved with dose adjustment.

Improving tolerability of pembrolizumab with weight based dosing: A meta-analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2639-2639
Author(s):  
Nabeela Khan Patail ◽  
Amna Falak Sher ◽  
Shenhong Wu
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Placebo Control ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Discontinuation Rate ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
American Society ◽  
The Impact

2639 Background: Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), has demonstrated significant clinical activity in various cancers. Despite a favorable toxicity profile, discontinuation due to adverse events including immune related adverse events (irAE) has been reported. We conducted a meta-analysis of published clinical trials to evaluate the tolerability of pembrolizumab in cancer patients. Methods: A systematic review was conducted of relevant studies from the databases of PubMed and abstracts presented at American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) from June 2015 until September 2020. Eligible studies included prospective clinical trials that reported a discontinuation rate due to adverse effects. Incidence, relative risk and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by employing fixed or random effects models. Results: A total of 6,380 patients with a variety of hematologic and solid malignancies from 20 studies of pembrolizumab were included for analysis. The overall rate of pembrolizumab discontinuation due to adverse events was 8.2% (95% CI: 6.4-10.4%). The discontinuation rate of pembrolizumab was not significantly lower than the chemotherapy controls, with RR of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.58-1.12, p = 0.33). However, the discontinuation rate of pembrolizumab was significantly higher compared to placebo control with RR of 2.20 (95% CI: 1.36-3.54, p < 0.001), and significantly lower compared to ipilimumab with RR of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.34-0.99, p = 0.04) respectively. The discontinuation rate varied widely among different tumor types with the lowest rate of 0.8% (95% CI: 0.2-3%) in gastric cancer, and the highest of 13.5% (95% CI: 10.8-16.8%) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Interestingly, the discontinuation rate varied with pembrolizumab dosing, with the fixed dosing of 200mg being 9.2% (95% CI: 6.9-12%) and the weight-based dosing being 6.5% (95% CI: 4.8-8.8%). The weight-based dosing was associated with a significantly lower discontinuation rate compared to controls with RR of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.47-0.81, p < 0.0001), while the fixed dosing had similar discontinuation rate with RR of 1.03 (95% CI: 0.89-1.20, p = 0.67). Conclusions: The tolerability of pembrolizumab may be comparable to chemotherapy in cancer patients and may vary with its dosing. Future studies are warranted to evaluate the impact of different dosing.

Risk of pneumonitis with mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors everolimus and temsirolimus.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13573-e13573
Author(s):  
Vishal Navnitray Ranpura ◽  
Shenhong Wu
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Cancer Therapeutics ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
American Society

e13573 Background: Pneumonitis is associated with the use of mTOR inhibitors, everolimus and temsirolimus, which have been used widely in cancer therapeutics and clinical trials. Currently, the overall risk of pneumonits in patients treated with mTOR inhibitors has not been defined. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical trials to assess the risk of pneumonitis in cancer patients treated with mTOR inhibitors. Methods: Databases from PUBMED, the Web of Science, and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology conferences until May 2012 were searched to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies included prospective clinical trials in which patients received treatment with everolimus or temsirolimus as a single agent or in combination with other agents. Summary incidence, relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated employing a fixed- or random-effects model based upon the heterogeneity of the included studies. Results: A total of 2,303 patients with a variety of tumors from 18 studies (everolimus: 12, temsirolimus: 6) were included for the analysis. The overall incidences of all-grade and high-grade pneumonitis with mTOR inhibitors were 6.5% (95% CI: 3.7-11.1%) and 2.5% (95% CI 1.2-5.4%) respectively. The risk of all-grade pneumonitis did not vary significantly with tumor types (P=0.079), but vary significantly with their combination with other agents (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between everolimus and temsirolimus in the incidence of all-grade (P=0.22) and high-grade (P=0.28) pneumonitis. In comparison with controls, mTOR inhibitors significantly increased the risk of all-grade (RR=5.2, 95% CI: 2.09-12.93, P<0.001) but not high-grade pneumonits (RR=2.63, 95% CI: 0.66-10.40, P=0.41). Conclusions: The risk of pneumonitis is increased in cancer patients receiving mTOR inhibitors without significant difference between everolimus and temsirolimus.

Fatal adverse events associated with pembrolizumab in cancer patients: A meta-analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2561-2561
Author(s):  
Gol Minoo Golshani ◽  
Amna Falak Sher ◽  
Shenhong Wu
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Programmed Cell Death 1 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
American Society ◽  
Fatal Adverse Events ◽  
Tumor Types

2561 Background: Pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) against programmed cell death-1(PD-1) protein has emerged as an effective treatment for many cancers. Although better tolerated than chemotherapy, it has unique immune related adverse event and little is known about its risk of fatal adverse events (FAE). Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of clinical trials to determine the incidence and risk of fatal adverse events with pembrolizumab. Methods: A systematic search for phase I-III clinical trials of pembrolizumab was conducted using databases from PUBMED, and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) conferences until October 2018. Eligible studies included prospective clinical trials of pembrolizumab with available data on FAE. Data on FAE was extracted from each study and pooled for calculations. Incidence, relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by employing fixed or random-effects models. Results: A total of 11 clinical trials of pembrolizumab, with 3713 patients were included for analysis. The overall incidence of FAE with pembrolizumab was 1.2% (95% CI: 0.5-2.8%).The incidence of FAE significantly varied among different tumor types (P=0.02), ranging from 0.2% in melanoma to 3.1% in breast cancer.The incidence of FAE was significantly higher (P<0.001) with chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab (7.0%, 95%CI: 4.9-10%) as compared to pembrolizumab alone (0.7%, 95% CI: 0.4-1.2, p=<0.001). There was no significant difference in the risk of FAEs when pembrolizumab was compared with chemotherapy with RR=1.24 (95% CI: 0.8-1.89, P=0.31). Conclusions: Pembrolizumab is similar to chemotherapy in the risk of fatal adverse events in cancer patients. Combination of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy increased the risk of FAE in comparison with pembrolizumab alone. Further studies are needed to identify risk factors. [Table: see text]

Tolerability of dual checkpoint blockade with nivolumab and ipilimumab: A meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15149-e15149
Author(s):  
Alejandro Ramon Carvajal ◽  
Judy Huang ◽  
Shenhong Wu
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Risk Mitigation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Discontinuation Rate ◽  
Fixed Effects Model ◽  
Increased Risk

e15149 Background: The dual checkpoint blockade of PD-1 and CTLA-4 with nivolumab and ipilimumab have been used extensively for cancer immunotherapy in clinical practice and trials due to its efficacy. A critical concern is the tolerability of the combination due to the increased risk of severe immune-mediated adverse events. A meta-analysis of clinical trials was performed to assess the treatment tolerability measured as discontinuation due to adverse events. Methods: A search through PubMed as well as abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) conferences until December 2019 was performed to identify clinical trials in which the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab was given to cancer patients. Eligible clinical trials reported a discontinuation rate due to adverse events for the groups of patients receiving nivolumab and ipilimumab. A random or fixed effects model was used to determine summary incidences, relative risks, and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Seven clinical studies which included a total of 3,213 patients (combo: 1746, control: 1467) with various cancers were selected. Overall, the intolerability of nivolumab and ipilimumab measured as the summary incidence of discontinuation due to adverse events was 25.1% (95% CI: 17.8-34.1%). The rate varied significantly with the type of cancer (P < 0.001). The lowest discontinuation rate was in uveal melanoma, with a rate of 11% (95% CI: 2.9-34.2%), and the highest discontinuation rate was in melanoma at 46.3% (95% CI: 36.6-56.4%). In comparison with chemotherapy controls from randomized controls, the intolerability was significantly higher with an relative risk of 2.1 (95% CI: 1.78-2.84) for the combination. Conclusions: There is a substantial risk for intolerability in cancer patients receiving the combination nivolumab and ipilimumab. Further studies are needed for risk mitigation.

Association Between Sex and Immune-Related Adverse Events During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Jing ◽  
Yongchang Zhang ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Kunyan Li ◽  
Xue Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Omics Data ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Abstract Background Accumulated evidence supports the existence of sex-associated differences in immune systems. Understanding the role of sex in immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is important for management of irAE in patients receiving immunotherapy. Methods We performed meta-analysis on published clinical study data and multivariable logistic regression on pharmacovigilance data and applied a propensity algorithm to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) omics data. We further validated our observations in two independent in-house cohorts of 179 and 767 cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Results A meta-analysis using 13 clinical studies that reported on 1,096 female patients (36.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 35.0%-38.5%) and 1,886 male patients (63.2%, 95% CI = 61.5%-65.0%) demonstrated no statistically significant irAE risk difference between the sexes (odds ratio [OR] = 1.19; 95% CI = 0.91-1.54; 2-sided P = 0.21). Multivariable logistic regression analysis of 12,225 patients from FAERS and 10,979 patients from VigiBase showed no statistically significant difference in irAEs by sex. A propensity score algorithm used on multi-omics data for 6,019 patients from TCGA found no statistically significant difference by sex for irAE-related factors/pathways. The retrospective analysis of two in-house patient cohorts validated these results (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 0.98-2.47; FDR = 0.13, for cohort 1; OR = 1.16, 95%CI = 0.86-1.57; FDR = 0.39, for cohort 2). Conclusion We observed minimal sex-associated differences in irAEs among cancer patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. It may be unnecessary to consider gender effects for irAE management in clinical practice.

Tolerability of axitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16536-e16536
Author(s):  
Bareia Chaudhry ◽  
Shenhong Wu
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Discontinuation Rate

e16536 Background: Axitinib has been used extensively as a single agent or in combination with immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. It can be often discontinued due to adverse events. A meta-analysis of clinical trials was performed to evaluate the overall tolerability of axitinib in this setting. Methods: PubMed (Up to November 2020) was searched to identify clinical trials of axitinib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Reported data was collected to include axitinib and control discontinuation due to adverse events. A random or fixed effects model was used to determine summary incidences, relative risks, and 95% confidence intervals depending on the heterogeneity of included studies. Results: A total of 11 studies including 4,056 patients (axitinib alone n = 1384, axitinib combination n = 987, control n = 1685) were included for analysis. The summary discontinuation rate for axitinib due to adverse events was 13.4% (95% CI; 11.7-15.2%) with 8.9% (95% CI: 5.3-14.6%) as a single agent and 26.6% (95% CI:17.8 –37.8%) in combination with other agents. In comparison with controls based on randomized controlled studies, axitinib overall has similar discontinuation rate due to adverse events (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.77-1.80). However, there was a significantly higher discontinuation rate with axitinib in combination with other agents including immunotherapeutic agents PD-L1 inhibitors than control treatment (RR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.24-1.86). Conclusions: The tolerability of axitinib may vary significantly with its use as a single agent or in combination in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Further studies are needed to improve its tolerability as a part of combination therapy.

scholarly journals The association between immune-related adverse events and the prognosis of solid cancer patients treated with immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592098054
Author(s):  
Huilin Xu ◽  
Ximing Xu ◽  
Wei Ge ◽  
Jinju Lei ◽  
Dedong Cao
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Good Survival ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Early Effect ◽  
Overall Response

Background: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are common during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment and reported to be associated with good survival. This study evaluated the association between onset timing of irAEs and survival of cancer patients treated with ICIs. Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched to retrieve clinical studies assessing the relationship between irAEs and survival in cancer patients with ICIs. The overall response rate for treatment response and hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using RevMan 5.3. Subgroup analysis in terms of cancer type, ICIs type, region, specific irAEs, accordingly. Results: A total of 34 studies were included. The HRs for OS and PFS in cancer patients with versus without irAEs were 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44, 0.74; p < 0.0001], and 0.50 (95% CI: 0.37, 0.67; p < 0.00001), respectively. The odds ratio for overall response in cancer patients with irAEs was 4.72 (95% CI: 3.48, 6.40; p < 0.00001) compared with those without irAEs. Subgroup analyses suggested that the prognostic role of irAEs was associated with cancer types and region, but not irAEs types. The landmark analysis of OS revealed that there is a non-proportional (early) effect of irAEs on OS in ICI-treated cancer patients (landmark >12 weeks, HROS = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.30; p = 0.46). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the occurrence of irAEs could be a prognostic factor for cancer patients who were treated with ICIs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document