A real-world application of liquid biopsy (LB) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 48-48
Author(s):  
Letizia Procaccio ◽  
Marzia Del Re ◽  
Stefania Crucitta ◽  
Giulia Gianfilippo ◽  
Francesca Daniel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Digital Pcr ◽  
Turnaround Time ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
First Line ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Tissue Recovery

48 Background: First-line decision making is the key to the successful management of mCRC patients (pts). RAS/BRAF status is essential to choose the best targeted agent. In hub centers, a not negligible proportion of pts referred from elsewhere may not have standard tissue-based (STB) molecular results available at the time of first oncologic visit (T0). LB may help circumvent these hurdles. Methods: A monoinstitutional prospective head-to-head comparison of LB versus (vs) STB testing was conducted in a real-world setting. Selection criteria included: mCRC with unknown RAS/BRAF status at T0, tissue from primary or metastases archived in external centers, no previous anti- EGFR agents. At T0, pts underwent plasma sampling for LB testing and procedure for tissue recovery. RAS/BRAF genotyping was carried out by droplet digital PCR on circulating-free (cf) DNA. Primary endpoint was the comparison of time to LB (T1) vs STB (T2) results. Secondary endpoints were the overall percent agreement (OPA), specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of LB. Urinary (u) cfDNA testing was also explored. Results: A total of 33 pts were included. Mean T1 was 7 (2-12) days (d) as compared to 22 (7-65) d mean T2. T2 included a mean time for tissue recovery of 17 d. The OPA between LB and STB analysis was 83%. Compared to STB testing, LB specificity and sensitivity were 90% and 80%, respectively, with a PPV of 94% and NPV of 69%. In detail, at STB and LB testing, RAS mutation was found in 50% and 43% of pts; BRAF mutation in 17% and 13%, respectively. LB results included 1 false positive and 4 false negative (FN). FN showed a significantly lower tumor burden (i.e. total tumor volume) at basal CT scan. Concordance between STB and ucfDNA testing was 89%, with a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 100% recorded for ucfDNA analysis. Conclusions: Faster turnaround time, high concordance and accuracy are 3 key-points supporting the adoption of LB in routinary mCRC care, in particular when decision on first-line is urgent and tissue recovery from external centers may require a long time. Results should be interpreted with caution in LB wild-type cases with low tumor burden.

scholarly journals A Real-World Application of Liquid Biopsy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Poseidon Study

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 5128
Author(s):  
Letizia Procaccio ◽  
Francesca Bergamo ◽  
Francesca Daniel ◽  
Cosimo Rasola ◽  
Giada Munari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Liquid Biopsy ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Digital Pcr ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
First Line ◽  
Percent Agreement ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Tissue Recovery

Background: First-line decision making is the key to the successful care of mCRC patients and RAS/BRAF status is crucial to select the best targeted agent. In hub centers, a relevant proportion of patients referred from small volume centers may not have standard tissue-based (STB) molecular results available at the time of the first visit (T0). Liquid biopsy (LB) may help circumvent these hurdles. Methods: A monoinstitutional prospective head-to-head comparison of LB versus (vs.) STB testing was performed in a real-world setting. Selection criteria included: mCRC diagnosis with unknown RAS/BRAF status at T0, tumoral tissue archived in external centers, no previous treatment with anti-EGFR. At T0, patients underwent plasma sampling for LB testing and procedure for tissue recovery. RAS/BRAF genotyping was carried out by droplet digital PCR on circulating-tumoral (ct) DNA. The primary endpoint was the comparison of time to LB (T1) vs. STB (T2) results using the Mann–Whitney U test. Secondary endpoints were the concordance between LB and STB defined as overall percent agreement and the accuracy of LB in terms of specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive value. We also performed an exploratory analysis on urinary (u) ctDNA. Results: A total of 33 mCRC patients were included. Mean T1 and T2 was 7 and 22 days (d), respectively (p < 0.00001). T2 included a mean time for archival tissue recovery of 17 d. The overall percent agreement between LB and STB analysis was 83%. Compared to STB testing, LB specificity and sensitivity were 90% and 80%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 94% and negative one of 69%. In detail, at STB and LB testing, RAS mutation was found in 45% and 42% of patients, respectively; BRAF mutation in 15%. LB results included one false positive and four false negative. False negative cases showed a significantly lower tumor burden at basal CT scan. Concordance between STB and uctDNA testing was 89%. Conclusions: Faster turnaround time, high concordance and accuracy are three key points supporting the adoption of LB in routinary mCRC care, in particular when decision on first-line therapy is urgent and tissue recovery from external centers may require a long time. Results should be interpreted with caution in LB wild-type cases with low tumor burden.

Real world treatment patterns of first-line combination therapies among BRAF+ metastatic melanoma patients stratified by tumor burden.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 198-198
Author(s):  
Sameer Ghate ◽  
Jackson Tang ◽  
Zhiyi Li ◽  
Antonio Reis Nakasato
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Discontinuation Rate ◽  
First Line ◽  
High Tumor Burden ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Measured Time

198 Background: For patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma (MM) and BRAF V600 mutation (BRAF+), options for first-line (1L) systemic combination therapy include immunotherapy (IO) or targeted therapy (TT). This study describes real world treatment patterns among BRAF+ MM pts treated with 1L ipilimumab+nivolumab (I+N) or dabrafenib+trametinib (D+T), stratified by tumor burden. Methods: A retrospective observational analysis used Flatiron Health’s electronic health record-derived database from Oct ’15 - Jul ’16. Pts were aged ≥18 years with a MM diagnosis, tested BRAF+ prior to therapy, and treated with ipilimumab+nivolumab (I+N) or dabrafenib+trametinib (D+T) as 1L therapy. Low tumor burden was defined as low/normal LDH (≤ 333 IU/L) and no brain metastasis. High tumor burden was defined as high LDH ( > 333 IU/L) or brain metastasis. Baseline characteristics and treatment patterns were descriptively assessed. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis measured time to discontinuation. Results: Among 76 BRAF+ pts, 38% (29) were treated with I+N as 1L, and 62% (47) were treated with D+T as 1L. Of these, 45% (13/29) of I+N vs. 32% (15/47) of D+T had low tumor burden, while 41% (12/29) of I+N vs. 49% (23/47) of D+T had high tumor burden. The two cohorts did not differ by age or gender. Treatment patterns are summarized below. Conclusions: Among pts with low tumor burden, I+N demonstrated shorter time to discontinuation and higher discontinuation rate relative to D+T. Treatment toxicity and progression was the main reason for discontinuation of I+N and D+T, respectively. Among pts with high tumor burden, I+N demonstrated longer time to discontinuation but higher discontinuation rate relative to D+T. Progression was the main reason for discontinuation of both I+N and D+T. [Table: see text]

Real-world efficacy and safety of lenvatinib-base therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in China: A multicenter retrospective analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16192-e16192
Author(s):  
Qicong Mai ◽  
Song Chen ◽  
Feng Shi ◽  
Zhiqiang Mo ◽  
Jian He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Real World ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3

e16192 Background: Lenvatinib has been approved as a first-line systemic for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after the randomized phase III REFLECT trial. The aim of this study was to assess the lenvatinib-base treatment patterns and safety in real-world clinical settings in China. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, A total of 278 patients with unresectable HCC were treated with lenvatinib-base treatment between October 2018 and November 2020 were analyzed. Therapeutic effect was determined using the RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria. Progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were also evaluated. Results: Of 278 unresectable HCC patients (median age: 56.1±11.9 years), 220 (79.1%) had cirrhosis caused by HBV infection. 215 (77.3%) and 63 (22.7%) patients were classified as Child-pugh A and B class, respectively. 233 (83.8%) and 45 (16.2%) patients received lenvatinib in first-line and second-line systemic therapies, respectively. 223 (80.2%) patients were treated with lenvatinib plus arterially directed therapy (TACE or HAIC of FOLFOX) and 55 (19.8%) were treated with lenvatinib alone. The objective response rate were 34.9% (RECIST) and 47.5% (mRECIST), while the disease control rate were 75.5%. With a median follow-up period of 12.8 months, the median PFS and OS were 7.8 months (95% CI 7.1–8.4) and 17.2 months (95% CI 14.9–19.6), respectively. Results from the multivariate analysis showed that the significant independent favorable prognosis factors were tumor burden< 50% (P=0.033), Child–Pugh A class (P<0.01), AFP level <200ng/mL (P=0.045), the combination with lenvatinib and arterially directed therapy (P<0.01). TRAE occurred in 219 of 278 patients (78.8%), most common TRAE were hypertension (n=118; 42.4%) and hand-foot skin reaction (n=91; 32.7%). The most common grade 3–4 TARE were hypertension (n=23; 8.3%), decreased appetite (n=18; 6.5%), AST elevation (n=14; 5%), and diarrhea (n=14; 5%) across all study patients. Conclusions: In this multicenter real-world study, lenvatinib-base treatment could be accomplished with well tolerated and response for unresectable HCC patients. Combination with arterially directed therapy could likely improve the overall survival.

scholarly journals First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for metastatic PD-L1-positive NSCLC: real-world analysis of time on treatment

Immunotherapy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 889-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vamsidhar Velcheti ◽  
Sheenu Chandwani ◽  
Xin Chen ◽  
M Catherine Pietanza ◽  
Thomas Burke
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
First Line

An Italian, multicenter, real-world, retrospective study of first-line pazopanib in unselected metastatic renal-cell carcinoma patients: the ‘Pamerit’ study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Mosca ◽  
Ugo De Giorgi ◽  
Giuseppe Procopio ◽  
Umberto Basso ◽  
Giacomo Cartenì ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Renal Cell Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

Abstract Objective Despite the current immunotherapy era, VEGFR inhibitors maintain effectiveness in metastatic renal cell cancer. Real-world data concerning pazopanib are limited. The aim of this study is to add information about efficacy and safety of pazopanib as first-line treatment in metastatic renal cell cancer patients not enrolled into clinical trials. Methods Retrospective analysis (the PAMERIT study) of first-line pazopanib in real-world metastatic renal cell cancer patients among 39 Centers in Italy. Outcomes were progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate and treatment-related adverse events. Kaplan–Meier curves, log-rank test and multivariable Cox’s models were used and adjusted for age, histology, previous renal surgery, International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium score and pazopanib initial dose. Results Among 474 patients, 87.3% had clear cell metastatic renal cell cancer histology. Most of them (84.6%) had upfront renal surgery. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 15.8 and 34.4 months, respectively, significantly correlating with International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium’s good prognosis (P &lt; 0.001), ECOG PS 0 (P &lt; 0.001), age (&lt;75 years, P = 0.005), surgery (P &lt; 0.001) and response to pazopanib (P &lt; 0.001). After 3 months of pazopanib, overall disease control rate have been observed in 76.6% patients. Among International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium’s favorable group patients, 57/121 (47%) showed complete/partial response. No unexpected AEs emerged. Conclusions In this real-world study, metastatic renal cell cancer patients treated with first-line pazopanib reached greater progression-free survival and overall survival than in pivotal studies and had high response rates when belonging to International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium’s favorable group, without new toxicities. Pazopanib has been confirmed a valid first-line option for International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium’s good prognosis metastatic renal cell cancer patients who cannot be submitted to immunotherapy.

scholarly journals First-line daratumumab shows high efficacy and tolerability even in advanced AL amyloidosis: the real-world experience

ESMO Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 100065
Author(s):  
G. Jeryczynski ◽  
M. Antlanger ◽  
F. Duca ◽  
C. Binder-Rodriguez ◽  
T. Reiter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
High Efficacy ◽  
First Line ◽  
The Real

scholarly journals POS0619 MODELLING OF DISEASE ACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY ARTHROPATHIES TREATED WITH ETANERCEPT ORIGINATOR OR BIOSIMILAR AS FIRST-LINE BIOLOGIC IN AN AUSTRALIAN REAL-WORLD DATASET

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 547.1-547
Author(s):  
C. Deakin ◽  
G. Littlejohn ◽  
H. Griffiths ◽  
T. Smith ◽  
C. Osullivan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Activity ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Real World ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Linear Quadratic ◽  
First Line ◽  
Modest Improvement ◽  
Over Time

Background:The availability of biosimilars as non-proprietary versions of established biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) is enabling greater access for patients with rheumatic diseases to effective medications at a lower cost. Since April 2017 both the originator and a biosimilar for etanercept (trade names Enbrel and Brenzys, respectively) have been available for use in Australia.Objectives:[1]To model effectiveness of etanercept originator or biosimilar in reducing Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C reactive protein (DAS28CRP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated with either drug as first-line bDMARD[2]To describe persistence on etanercept originator or biosimilar as first-line bDMARD in patients with RA, PsA or ASMethods:Clinical data were obtained from the Optimising Patient outcomes in Australian rheumatoLogy (OPAL) dataset, derived from electronic medical records. Eligible patients with RA, PsA or AS who initiated etanercept originator (n=856) or biosimilar (n=477) as first-line bDMARD between 1 April 2017 and 31 December 2020 were identified. Propensity score matching was performed to select patients on originator (n=230) or biosimilar (n=136) with similar characteristics in terms of diagnosis, disease duration, joint count, age, sex and concomitant medications. Data on clinical outcomes were recorded at 3 months after baseline, and then at 6-monthly intervals. Outcomes data that were missing at a recorded visit were imputed.Effectiveness of the originator, relative to the biosimilar, for reducing DAS28CRP over time was modelled in the matched population using linear mixed models with both random intercepts and slopes to allow for individual heterogeneity, and weighting of individuals by inverse probability of treatment weights to ensure comparability between treatment groups. Time was modelled as a combination of linear, quadratic and cubic continuous variables.Persistence on the originator or biosimilar was analysed using survival analysis (log-rank test).Results:Reduction in DAS28CRP was associated with both time and etanercept originator treatment (Table 1). The conditional R-squared for the model was 0.31. The average predicted DAS28CRP at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months were 4.0 and 4.4, 3.1 and 3.4, 2.6 and 2.8, 2.3 and 2.6, and 2.2 and 2.4 for the originator and biosimilar, respectively, indicating a clinically meaningful effect of time for patients on either drug and an additional modest improvement for patients on the originator.Median time to 50% of patients stopping treatment was 25.5 months for the originator and 24.1 months for the biosimilar (p=0.53). An adverse event was the reason for discontinuing treatment in 33 patients (14.5%) on the originator and 18 patients (12.9%) on the biosimilar.Conclusion:Analysis using a large national real-world dataset showed treatment with either the etanercept originator or the biosimilar was associated with a reduction in DAS28CRP over time, with the originator being associated with a further modest reduction in DAS28CRP that was not clinically significant. Persistence on treatment was not different between the two drugs.Table 1.Respondent characteristics.Fixed EffectEstimate95% Confidence Intervalp-valueTime (linear)0.900.89, 0.911.5e-63Time (quadratic)1.011.00, 1.011.3e-33Time (cubic)1.001.00, 1.007.1e-23Originator0.910.86, 0.960.0013Acknowledgements:The authors acknowledge the members of OPAL Rheumatology Ltd and their patients for providing clinical data for this study, and Software4Specialists Pty Ltd for providing the Audit4 platform.Supported in part by a research grant from Investigator-Initiated Studies Program of Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.Disclosure of Interests:Claire Deakin: None declared, Geoff Littlejohn Consultant of: Over the last 5 years Geoffrey Littlejohn has received educational grants and consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen, Sandoz, Sanofi and Seqirus., Hedley Griffiths Consultant of: AbbVie, Gilead, Novartis and Lilly., Tegan Smith: None declared, Catherine OSullivan: None declared, Paul Bird Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, abbvie, pfizer, BMS, UCB, Gilead, Novartis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document