The evolution of the education module for men with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) in the prostate cancer supportive care (PCSC) program.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 279-279
Author(s):  
Jennifer Marie Rauw ◽  
Sunil Parimi ◽  
Nikita Ivanov ◽  
Jessica Noble ◽  
Eugenia Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Oncology Nurse ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Medical Oncologists ◽  
Hormone Sensitive ◽  
Virtual Platform ◽  
Satisfaction Surveys

279 Background: The PCSC Program was initiated in 2013 at the Vancouver Prostate Centre to provide a comprehensive program for patients and partners with prostate cancer. This program provides educational sessions (ES) and clinical services, including decision-making for primary therapy, sexual health, pelvic floor physiotherapy, hormone therapy, counseling, exercise, and nutrition for patients in BC, Canada. In 2016, the PCSC Program expanded to BC Cancer Victoria and in 2017 to other BC Cancer sites. In 2018, medical oncologists (MDs) in Victoria (JR, SP) developed an Education Module addressing treatment options for men with metastatic hormone sensitive (mHSPC) and metastatic castration resistant (mCRPC) disease. MDs delivered in-person ES in Victoria in 2018 and, in 2019, added a virtual platform (VP) option. From 3-5/2020, the ESs were on hold due to the COVID pandemic and parental leaves. In 6/2020, the ESs resumed only on VP, and the PCSC Oncology Nurse Practitioner (NP), NI, gave the presentations for the MDs on leave. In 10/2020, due to a changing standard of care for mHSPC, the PCSC team consolidated the two ESs into one. We report on the evolution of this Education Module in response to both the changing standard of care and the COVID pandemic. Methods: We prospectively collected attendance and patient characteristic metrics from all ES for men with mPC. We tracked presenter type (MD vs. NP) and prospectively collected anonymous patient satisfaction questionnaires. Results: From 1/2018 to 1/2021, 100 men registered for 27 ES; 81 men, 41 partners, and 2 family members actually attended. 48/75 (64%) men were white, 39/75 (52%) retired, and 56/75 (74.7%) married. 47 men attended 12 mHSPC ES, 13 men attended ten mCRPC ES, and 17 attended four consolidated ES. MDs presented 15 ES, and the NP presented 12 ES. Responses to questions on 70 satisfaction surveys were similar for MD vs. NP presenters. 9 responders to the recently added VP-specific questions said they agreed (4) or strongly agreed (5) that it was beneficial to watch the ES at home on a computer. The Table below shows attendance per site per year. Conclusions: The ESs for men with mPC were well-received. Although there was a VP option before COVID, attendance increased significantly after the lockdown as patients and providers became more familiar with VPs. Satisfaction surveys confirmed that an NP could deliver the ES rather than MD. Consolidation of the mHSPC and mCRPC ES reflected the changing standard of care and resulted in more efficient use of presenter time. Virtual delivery of the sessions provided greater access to those living in distant or remote areas of the province and those in lockdown during the COVID pandemic. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Efficacy of enzalutamide in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive and castration-refractory prostate cancer: authors’ experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 130-136
Author(s):  
T. V. Ustinova ◽  
L. V. Bolotina ◽  
A. A. Paichadze ◽  
A. A. Kachmazov ◽  
A. A. Fedenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Case ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Male Population ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Age Of Diagnosis ◽  
Hormone Sensitive ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
New Generation

Prostate cancer is one of the most common neoplasms in men. It currently ranks second in Russian Federation amongst male population in overall number of cases after only lung cancer and third in cancer mortality. Prostate cancer is rarely diagnosed in patients younger than 40 years old, with overage age of diagnosis being between 50 and 70 years. A lot of different new treatment options were developed in the last decade for patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC). Despite androgen-deprivation remaining the standard of therapy, it has been proven that the addition of cytotoxic and hormonal drugs of new generation improves overall survival of patients with castration-sensitive and castration-resistant metastatic disease. Recently, enzalutamide became the new standard of care not only in castration-resistant mPC, but also in the setting of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer, due to the data acquired in two large randomized trials ARCHES and ENZAMET. This article provides clinical examples demonstrating the effectiveness of enzalutamide in various forms of prostate cancer. In the first clinical case enzalutamide was used in the treatment of castration-sensitive mPC. Currently, patient continues to receive this therapy with progression-free interval exceeding 11  months. In  the  second clinical case, enzalutamide has shown its efficacy in  the  setting of  castration-resistant PC. Stable disease was achieved and as of  right now patient has shown no signs of  progression for 9 months, which is already a significantly better result in comparison with previous lines of treatment. 

scholarly journals Discovery of primary prostate cancer biomarkers using cross cancer learning

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaiyue Zhou ◽  
Suzan Arslanturk ◽  
Douglas B. Craig ◽  
Elisabeth Heath ◽  
Sorin Draghici
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cancer Genes ◽  
Cancer Disease ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Primary Prostate Cancer ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Novel Biomarkers ◽  
Hormone Sensitive

AbstractProstate cancer (PCa), the second leading cause of cancer death in American men, is a relatively slow-growing malignancy with multiple early treatment options. Yet, a significant number of low-risk PCa patients are over-diagnosed and over-treated with significant and long-term quality of life effects. Further, there is ever increasing evidence of metastasis and higher mortality when hormone-sensitive or castration-resistant PCa tumors are treated indistinctively. Hence, the critical need is to discover clinically-relevant and actionable PCa biomarkers by better understanding the biology of PCa. In this paper, we have discovered novel biomarkers of PCa tumors through cross-cancer learning by leveraging the pathological and molecular similarities in the DNA repair pathways of ovarian, prostate, and breast cancer tumors. Cross-cancer disease learning enriches the study population and identifies genetic/phenotypic commonalities that are important across diseases with pathological and molecular similarities. Our results show that ADIRF, SLC2A5, C3orf86, HSPA1B are among the most significant PCa biomarkers, while MTRNR2L1, EEPD1, TEPP and VN1R2 are jointly important biomarkers across prostate, breast and ovarian cancers. Our validation results have further shown that the discovered biomarkers can predict the disease state better than any randomly selected subset of differentially expressed prostate cancer genes.

scholarly journals Choice of treatment options for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. 90-99
Author(s):  
R. A. Gafanov ◽  
A. G. Dzidzaria ◽  
I. B. Kravtsov ◽  
S. V. Fastovets
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
The Past ◽  
Choice Of Treatment ◽  
Hormone Sensitive ◽  
The Impact

The arsenal of available treatments and treatments for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHRPC) has increased significantly over the past 5 years. Although androgen-preferential therapy (ADT) remains the mainstay of treatment, the addition of docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, or local external beam radiation therapy improves the outcome of patients with mHRPC and becomes the standard of care. Choosing a therapy to improve treatment outcomes for patients with mHRPC is becoming increasingly challenging as there are different options for this stage of the disease. This article provides an overview of clinical trials that included ADT in combination with chemotherapy, new hormonal therapy, and radiation therapy. We will also consider recent advances in the choice of treatment for men diagnosed with mHPCR and the impact of previous therapy on the subsequent biology of the disease. Options include chemohormone therapy, androgen receptor (AR) targeted therapy in addition to ADT or, less commonly, ADT alone. The choice of treatment should be based on a consideration of the clinical characteristics and characteristics of the disease, as well as taking into account the patient’s preferences, territorial constraints and financial resources.

AR Copy Number and AR Signaling-directed Therapies in Castrationresistant Prostate Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 869-876
Author(s):  
Samanta Salvi ◽  
Vincenza Conteduca ◽  
Cristian Lolli ◽  
Sara Testoni ◽  
Valentina Casadio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Clinical Trial Design ◽  
Complete Information ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Hormone Sensitive ◽  
Predictive And Prognostic Biomarker

Background: Adaptive upregulation of Androgen Receptor (AR) is the most common event involved in the progression from hormone sensitive to Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC). AR signaling remains the main target of new AR signalling-directed therapies such as abiraterone and enzalutamide in CRPC patients. Objective: In this review, we discuss general mechanisms of resistance to AR-targeted therapies, with a focus on the role of AR Copy Number (CN). We reported methods and clinical applications of AR CN evaluation in tissue and liquid biopsy, thus to have a complete information regarding its role as predictive and prognostic biomarker. Conclusion: Outcomes of CRPC patients are reported to be highly variable as the consequence of tumor heterogeneity. AR CN could contribute to patient selection and tumor monitoring in CRPC treated with new anti-cancer treatment as abiraterone and enzalutamide. Further studies to investigate AR CN effect to these agents and its potential combination with other prognostic or predictive clinical factors are necessary in the context of harmonized clinical trial design.

Treatment Given Near the End of Life in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 536-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna A. Zaghloul ◽  
Jose R. Murillo
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Impact On Survival ◽  
New Treatments

Chemotherapy treatment options are limited for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The purpose of this study is to report treatment use and adverse effects (AEs) within the last three months of life in patients with CRPC. Of the 88 patients identified, 32% received treatment within 3 months of death, and documented AEs occurred in 25% of patients. Of those, neutropenia (18.3%), nausea/vomiting (18.3%), and febrile neutropenia (13.6%) were the most frequent. Results of this study show high treatment utility towards the end-of-life in patients with CRPC, with one fourth of patients experiencing AEs. Attention to health-related quality of life becomes increasingly important as new treatments appear to have small impact on survival, and AEs of those treatments may significantly impact patient quality of life.

scholarly journals Three-month early change in prostate-specific antigen levels as a predictive marker for overall survival during hormonal therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shotaro Nakanishi ◽  
Masato Goya ◽  
Mitsuyoshi Tamaki ◽  
Takuma Oshiro ◽  
Seiichi Saito
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Pretreatment Level ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Hormone Sensitive

Abstract Objective: To date, there are no useful markers for predicting the prognosis of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). We evaluated the effect of early changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) progression and overall survival (OS) in mHSPC patients. Results: In 71 primary mHSPC patients treated with ADT, the median times to CRPC and OS were 15 months and 92 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a Gleason score of ≥8 (p = 0.004), an extent of disease value (EOD) of ≥2 (p = 0.004), and a 3-month PSA level >1% of the pretreatment level (p = 0.017) were independent predictors of shorter time to CRPC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was feasible at 0.822. For OS, a 3-month PSA level >1% of the pretreatment level was an independent predictor of time to CRPC (p = 0.004).Three factors were independent predictors of shorter time to CRPC. A 3-month PSA level >1% of the pretreatment level correlated with poor a prognosis.

scholarly journals A A Canadian consensus forum on the management of patients with advanced prostate cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred Saad ◽  
Christina Canil ◽  
Antonio Finelli ◽  
Sebastien J. Hotte ◽  
Shawn Malone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Research Education ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Medical Oncologists ◽  
Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Scientific Group ◽  
High Level

Introduction: The management of advanced prostate cancer (PCa) continues to evolve with the emergence of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. As a result, there are multiple areas in this landscape with a lack of high-level evidence to guide practice. Consensus initiatives are an approach to establishing practice guidance in areas where evidence is unclear. We conducted a Canadian-based consensus forum to address key controversial areas in the management of advanced PCa. Methods: As part of a modified Delphi process, a core scientific group of PCa physicians (n=8) identified controversial areas for discussion and developed an initial set of questions, which were then reviewed and finalized with a larger group of 29 multidisciplinary PCa specialists. The main areas of focus were non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), oligometastatic prostate cancer, genetic testing in prostate cancer, and imaging in advanced prostate cancer. The predetermined threshold for consensus was set at 74% (agreement from 20 of 27 participating physicians). Results: Consensus participants included uro-oncologists (n=13), medical oncologists (n=10), and radiation oncologists (n=4). Of the 64 questions, consensus was reached in 30 questions (n=5 unanimously). Consensus was more common for questions related to biochemical recurrence, sequencing of therapies, and mCRPC. Conclusions: A Canadian consensus forum in PCa identified areas of agreement in nearly 50% of questions discussed. Areas of variability may represent opportunities for further research, education, and sharing of best practices. These findings reinforce the value of multidisciplinary consensus initiatives to optimize patient care.

scholarly journals Strategies for Optimizing the Clinical Impact of Immunotherapeutic Agents Such as Sipuleucel-T in Prostate Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1505-1512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi A. Madan ◽  
Thomas Schwaab ◽  
James L. Gulley
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Immune Responses ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Therapeutic Vaccines ◽  
Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
New Strategies

Sipuleucel-T is a therapeutic cancer vaccine that has shown improved survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. As a first-in-class agent, it has been met with both fan-fare and controversy. A broad review of immune-based therapies may reveal the delayed clinical impact of sipuleucel-T to be a class effect. As new strategies of immune-based therapy are developed, their effects can be optimized through better understanding of how they affect disease differently from more standard therapeutics. Furthermore, combination therapy with agents that can either work synergistically with immune-activating therapies or deplete immune-regulating cells may result in more vigorous immune responses and improved clinical outcomes. In addition, therapeutic vaccines may be ideal candidates to safely combine with standard-of-care therapies because of their nonoverlapping toxicity profile. The ultimate role of immunotherapy may not be to supplant standard therapies, but rather to work in concert with them to maximize clinical benefit for patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document