scholarly journals Promising Immunotherapy in Metastatic Testicular Sex Cord Stromal Tumours After First-Line Chemotherapy

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingqing Shang ◽  
Chuanzhen Cao ◽  
Weixing Jiang ◽  
Hongzhe Shi ◽  
Xingang Bi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Chemotherapy Resistance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
First Line ◽  
Experienced Grade ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

BackgroundTesticular sex cord stromal tumours (TSCSTs) are rare, with few studies focusing on the metastatic TSCST prognosis. The value of treatments, including radical orchiectomy (RO) and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), in preventing metastasis is controversial. Additionally, metastatic TSCSTs are resistant to chemotherapy. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy in metastatic TSCSTs after first-line chemotherapy.MethodsWe retrospectively screened patients with testicular tumours undergoing testis surgery between January 2005 and January 2019. Patients with TSCSTs who had undergone testis-sparing surgery (TSS) or RO were identified. The malignant type was defined as metastasis confirmed by pathology. Treatment responses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety were analysed.ResultsAmong the 494 testicular tumour patients who received TSS or RO, 11 (2.2%) patients with histologically proven TSCSTs were identified. At the last follow-up, 7 patients survived without tumours, and 4 patients developed metastasis and received first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy, with 1 of them achieving an objective response. Their PFS times were 1.5, 2.2, 9.0, and 17.0 months, respectively. Two patients received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after developing chemotherapy resistance and achieved a partial response up to the last follow-up; one of them experienced Grade 1 adverse events, and the other experienced Grade 2 adverse events during immunotherapy. The median OS time of the 4 patients with metastatic TSCSTs was 32 months.ConclusionsTSCSTs are rare, and most are benign with a good prognosis. ICIs represent a promising option for improving clinical outcomes in metastatic TSCSTs.

Efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with sarcomatoid and/or rhabdoid (S/R) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 66-66
Author(s):  
Ziad Bakouny ◽  
Sarah Abou Alaiwi ◽  
Amin Nassar ◽  
John A. Steinharter ◽  
Xiao X. Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Logistic Regressions

66 Background: Patients with mRCC with S/R components tend to have a poor prognosis with few therapeutic options available. Recent data suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies may be especially effective for these patients. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of ICI-based therapies in patients with S/R mRCC. Methods: We retrospectively assessed objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) & overall survival (OS) of patients with S/R mRCC treated at our institution with first-line ICI-based therapies and compared these to those of patients treated with first-line non-ICI-based therapies. Univariable and multivariable (adjusted for IMDC group) Cox and logistic regressions were performed. Results: 92 patients (70 S, 9 R, and 13 S&R) patients were included, of which 74 with a clear-cell component. For all patients (regardless of therapy), 74 (80.4%) patients experienced a PFS event (progression or death) and 52 (56.5%) died at 25.3 months (m) median follow-up. Overall median PFS was 5.3 m (95% CI= 3.4–7.2) and 24 m OS rate was 39.5% (27.4–51.7). Out of 78 patients in whom response was evaluable, ORR was 30.8% (20.4–41.2). Patients treated with ICI-based therapies had significantly better ORR, PFS, and OS on multivariable analysis (table). Conclusions: mRCC patients with S/R components have significantly better ORR, PFS, and OS with first-line ICI-based compared to non-ICI-based therapies. These data support the use of ICI-based therapies for patients with S/R mRCC. [Table: see text]

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib for the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic, Recurrent Cervical Cancer after Failure of Radiotherapy and First-Line Chemotherapy: A Prospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 649-655
Author(s):  
Xiaoping Xia ◽  
Wenjing Jiang ◽  
Wencai Qi ◽  
Baoli Hong ◽  
Weidong Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Recurrent Cervical Cancer ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> As a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), apatinib has shown a survival benefit in multiple solid tumors. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with metastatic, recurrent cervical cancer after failure of radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 42 patients between June 2018 and March 2019 were involved in this study. All patients orally received apatinib once daily in a 4-week cycle until disease progression or adverse events that prohibit further therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adverse events. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During a median follow-up of 13 months, 8 patients achieved a partial response and 24 cases achieved stable disease. None of them reported a complete response. The ORR and DCR were 19.0 and 76.2%, respectively. The median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI 4.9–7.1), and the median OS was 12.0 months (95% CI 10.1–13.9). The global health score/HRQoL improved significantly following 3-cycle treatment (50.4 ± 12.5 vs. 60.1 ± 11.8; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01). The most frequent grade 3–4 adverse events were hand-foot syndrome, hypertension and fatigue. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Apatinib should be an effective and tolerable treatment option for patients with metastatic, recurrent cervical cancer after failure of radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy.

scholarly journals SAT0540 ONE-YEAR OUTCOMES AFTER RHEUMATIC IMMUNE-RELATED ADVERSE EVENTS FROM CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1227.2-1227
Author(s):  
E. Berard ◽  
T. Barnetche ◽  
L. Rouxel ◽  
C. Dutriaux ◽  
L. Dousset ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Symptomatic Treatment ◽  
Musculoskeletal Symptoms ◽  
Day Range ◽  
One Year

Background:Description and initial management of rheumatic immune-related adverse-events (irAEs) from cancer immunotherapies have been reported by several groups but to date, few studies have evaluated the long-term outcomes and management of rheumatic irAEs (1).Objectives:To describe the long-term management and assess the one-year outcomes of patients who experienced rheumatic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).Methods:This was a single-centre prospective observational study including patients referred for musculoskeletal symptoms while treated with ICI. After baseline rheumatological evaluation defining the clinical entity presented, follow-up visits were organised according to the type and severity of irAE. At one year, persistence of irAE, ongoing treatment, as well as cancer outcomes were assessed.Results:63 patients were included between September 2015 and June 2018. 24 patients (38%) presented with non-inflammatory musculoskeletal conditions managed with short-term symptomatic treatment and did not require specific follow-up. 39 patients (62%) experienced inflammatory manifestations, mimicking either rheumatoid arthritis (RA, n=19), polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR, n=16), psoriatic arthritis (PsA, n=3) and one flare of a preexisting axial spondyloarthritis. Overall, 32 patients (82%) received systemic glucocorticoids, with a median rheumatic dosage of 15mg/day (range: 5-60mg/day). None of the patients had to permanently discontinue ICI therapy for rheumatic irAE. 20 patients (67%) were still receiving glucocorticoids at one year, with a median dosage of 5mg/day (range: 2-20mg/day). Glucocorticoids were more frequently discontinued for patients with RA-like condition (44%) than PMR-like condition (23%), but no other predictive factor of glucocorticoids withdrawal could be identified. At one year, overall survival and progression-free survival were comparable between patients who were still receiving glucocorticoids for rheumatic irAE and patients who have discontinued. Eight patients required csDMARDs.Conclusion:At one year, a majority of patients required long-term low-dose glucocorticoids for chronic rheumatic irAE, which seems not altering oncological control.References:[1]Braaten TJ, Brahmer JR, Forde PM, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced inflammatory arthritis persists after immunotherapy cessation. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Sep 20.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

First-line nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) plus two cycles of chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo alone (4 cycles) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Two-year update from CheckMate 9LA.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9000-9000
Author(s):  
Martin Reck ◽  
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu ◽  
Manuel Cobo ◽  
Michael Schenker ◽  
Bogdan Zurawski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

9000 Background: In the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 9LA trial (NCT03215706), first-line NIVO + IPI combined with 2 cycles of chemo significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) vs chemo alone (4 cycles). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level and histology. Here we report data with 2 years’ minimum follow-up from this study. Methods: Adult patients (pts) with stage IV / recurrent NSCLC, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, and no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were stratified by PD-L1 (< 1% vs ≥ 1%), sex, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 360 mg Q3W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W + chemo (2 cycles; n = 361) or chemo alone (4 cycles; n = 358). Pts with non-squamous NSCLC in the chemo-alone arm could receive pemetrexed maintenance. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included PFS and ORR by blinded independent central review, and efficacy by different PD-L1 levels. Safety was exploratory. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 24.4 months for OS (database lock: Feb 18, 2021), pts treated with NIVO + IPI + chemo continued to derive OS benefit vs chemo, with a median OS of 15.8 months vs 11.0 months, respectively (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.61–0.86]); 2-year OS rates were 38% vs 26%. Median PFS with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was 6.7 months vs 5.3 months (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56–0.79]); 8% and 37% of pts who had disease progression received subsequent immunotherapy, respectively. ORR was 38% with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs 25% with chemo. Similar clinical benefit with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was observed in all randomized pts and across the majority of subgroups, including by PD-L1 expression level (Table) or histology. Any grade and grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 92% and 48% of pts in the NIVO + IPI + chemo arm vs 88% and 38% in the chemo arm, respectively. Conclusion: With 2 years’ minimum follow-up, first-line NIVO + IPI + chemo demonstrated durable survival and benefit versus chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC; no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03215706. [Table: see text]

Tailored immunotherapy approach with nivolumab in advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TITAN-TCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 446-446
Author(s):  
Marc-Oliver Grimm ◽  
Bernd Schmitz-Dräger ◽  
Uwe Zimmermann ◽  
Barbara Grün ◽  
Gustavo Bruno Baretton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Third Line

446 Background: Several PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors including Nivolumab (Nivo) are approved in urothelial cancer. Recently, in the front line setting, improved activity of combined PD-L1 and CTLA4 immune-checkpoint inhibition has been reported and a phase III trial with Nivolumab + Ipilimumab (Nivo+Ipi) is ongoing. Here we report a response-based tailored approach starting treatment with Nivo monotherapy using Nivo+Ipi as immunotherapeutic “boost”. Methods: Between July 2017 and April 2019 86 patients were enrolled and treated according to protocol version 3 (cohort 1). Patients started with Nivo 240 mg Q2W induction. After 4 dosings and tumor assessment at week 8 (i) responders (PR/CR) to Nivo monotherapy continued with maintenance while (ii) patients with stable (SD) or progressive disease (PD) received 2 cycles Nivo3+Ipi1 followed by another 2 cycles Nivo1+Ipi3 if not responding. Median follow-up is 8.7 months. The primary endpoint is confirmed investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST1.1. Secondary endpoints include activity of Nivo monotherapy at week 8, remission rate with Nivo+Ipi “boosts”, safety, overall survival and quality of life. Results: Of the patients 42, 39 and 5 were first, second and third line, respectively. Median age was 67 years (range 45-84), 61 patients (71 %) were male and 25 female. ORR with Nivo monotherapy at first assessment (week 8) was 29 % and 23 % in first and second/third line, respectively. Of the patients 41 received Nivo+Ipi “boosts” after week 8 while 12 received later “boosts”. Best overall response (BOR) rate with Nivo induction ± Nivo+Ipi “boosts” was 48 % and 27 % in first and second/third line, respectively. In first line 7/17 (41 %) patients receiving Nivo+Ipi after week 8 had an improved response compared to 2/24 (8.3 %) in second/third line. Of the patients who continued with Nivo maintenance after week 8 and received later “boosts” 2/12 (17 %) had a PR and 2/12 (17 %) improved to SD. Treatment-related AEs will be presented. Conclusions: TITAN–TCC explores a response-driven use of Nivo+Ipi as an immunotherapeutic “boost”. In first line, this significantly improved ORR compared to the expected response rate of Nivo monotherapy, providing further evidence to the added value of Ipi in combination with Nivo. Further follow-up is ongoing to characterize duration and depth of response. Clinical trial information: NCT03219775 . Research Sponsor: Bristol-Myers Squibb[Table: see text]

scholarly journals The Efficacy of Ramucirumab in the Treatment of Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Hongqiong Yang ◽  
Yaojun Zhou ◽  
Liangzhi Wang ◽  
Tianyi Gu ◽  
Mengjia Lv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Five electronic databases were searched for eligible records. Outcomes were presented and analyzed according to the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) rate, and overall survival (OS) rate. Five records involving 2,024 participants were included in the study. The pooled analysis of OS and PFS were longer with ramucirumab (RAM) therapy than without RAM for OS (odds ratio OR = 0.90 , 95% confidence interval CI = 0.82 – 1.00 , p = 0.05 ) and PFS ( OR = 0.74 , 95 % CI = 0.57 – 0.96 , p = 0.02 ). Moreover, compared with the current first-line chemotherapy, the OS ( OR = 0.93 , 95 % CI = 0.83 – 1.04 , p = 0.19 ) and PFS ( OR = 0.82 , 95 % CI = 0.64 – 1.06 , p = 0.13 ) results were not significantly higher with RAM. The ORRs of the patients in the RAM therapy groups were significantly higher than those in the groups without RAM ( OR = 1.40 , 95 % CI = 1.14 – 1.73 , p = 0.001 ).

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus recombinant human endostatin in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A prospective and multicenter phase 2 trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21079-e21079
Author(s):  
Weize Lv ◽  
Beilong Zhong ◽  
Wenhua Zhao ◽  
Zhong Lin ◽  
Xiaofeng Pei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Recombinant Human Endostatin ◽  
Phase 2 Trial

e21079 Background: Although the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antiangiogenic agents in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been well established, evidence supporting the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus antiangiogenic drugs in previous treatment patients with advanced NSCLC is insufficient. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab combined with recombinant human endostatin (rh-Endostatin) as second-line or later treatment for advanced NSCLC. Methods: In this prospective and multicentre phase 2 trial we enrolled patients with advanced NSCLC who had not responded to standardized first-line treatment regimen from two cancer centres in China. Eligible patients were those aged 18-75 years without ICIs in first-line treatment who received nivolumab (3mg/kg, intravenous drip, day 1) every 2 weeks and rh-Endostatin (30 mg, 24-hour continous intravenous infusion，day 1–7) every 4 weeks till disease progression or discontinuation. The primary end points were objective response rate and safety. This study is registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, number ChiCTR1900023664. Results: A total of 35 patients (median age, 60 years; range, 37-72 years) received nivolumab and rh-Endostatin. Median previous treated line of eligible patients was 2 lines (range, 1-7 lines). Patients received a median of 2 cycles of therapy (range, 1-14 cycles). Eleven of 33 evaluable patients achieved confirmed partial response with an objective response rate of 33.3% (11/33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.2% – 49.4%) and disease control rate of 60.6% (20/33,95%CI:43.9%–77.3%). Median follow-up was 8.2 months (range: 0.9 –17.1). Median progression-free survival was 7.1 months (95% CI: 1.2m–13.0m), median overall survival was not reached and the 6-month overall survival rate was 54.5% (95% CI:37.6%–71.4%). The predominant grade 1-2 adverse events were thyroiditis, arrhythmia, hypertension. The grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were pneumonitis (3/35, 8.6%), hypertension (1/35, 2.9%) and atrial fibrillation (1/35, 2.9%), respectively. No grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events were observed. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective study that assessed nivolumab combined with rh-Endostatin as second-line or later treatment in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. In view of its encouraging efficacy and safety profile, nivolumab plus rh-Endostatin represents a promising treatment regimen in this patient population. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900023664.

Incorporation of Pazopanib in Maintenance Therapy of Ovarian Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30) ◽  
pp. 3374-3382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas du Bois ◽  
Anne Floquet ◽  
Jae-Weon Kim ◽  
Joern Rau ◽  
Josep M. del Campo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

PurposePazopanib is an oral, multikinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) -1/-2/-3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) -α/-β, and c-Kit. Preclinical and clinical studies support VEGFR and PDGFR as targets for advanced ovarian cancer treatment. This study evaluated the role of pazopanib maintenance therapy in patients with ovarian cancer whose disease did not progress during first-line chemotherapy.Patients and MethodsNine hundred forty patients with histologically confirmed cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum, International Federation Gynecology Obstetrics (FIGO) stages II-IV, no evidence of progression after primary therapy consisting of surgery and at least five cycles of platinum-taxane chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to receive pazopanib 800 mg once per day or placebo for up to 24 months. The primary end point was progression-free survival by RECIST 1.0 assessed by the investigators.ResultsMaintenance pazopanib prolonged progression-free survival compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.91; P = .0021; median, 17.9 v 12.3 months, respectively). Interim survival analysis based on events in 35.6% of the population did not show any significant difference. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events of hypertension (30.8%), neutropenia (9.9%), liver-related toxicity (9.4%), diarrhea (8.2%), fatigue (2.7%), thrombocytopenia (2.5%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (1.9%) were significantly higher in the pazopanib arm. Treatment discontinuation related to adverse events was higher among patients treated with pazopanib (33.3%) compared with placebo (5.6%).ConclusionPazopanib maintenance therapy provided a median improvement of 5.6 months (HR, 0.77) in progression-free survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who have not progressed after first-line chemotherapy. Overall survival data to this point did not suggest any benefit. Additional analysis should help to identify subgroups of patients in whom improved efficacy may balance toxicity (NCT00866697).

scholarly journals Checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. FSO421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aung Myint Tun ◽  
Kyaw Zin Thein ◽  
Wai Lin Thein ◽  
Elizabeth Guevara
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Background: We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of upfront add-on immunotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Methods: We performed a literature search on first-line chemotherapy ± immunotherapy in NSCLC. We utilized Revman version 5.3 to calculate the estimated pooled hazard ratio for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and pooled risk ratio for objective response rate (ORR), all-grade and high-grade adverse events with 95% CI. Results: We analyzed 4322 patients. The pooled hazard ratios for OS, PFS and ORR were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62–0.88; p = 0.0007), 0.62 (95% CI: 0.57–0.68; p = 0.00001) and 1.51 (95% CI: 1.3–1.74; p = 0.00001), respectively. The pooled risk ratios for all-grade and high-grade adverse events were 1.01 (95% CI: 0.99–1.03; p = 0.27) and 1.17 (95% CI: 1.07–1.28; p = 0.0006), respectively. Conclusion: Add-on immunotherapy significantly improves PFS, OS and ORR for the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with a reasonable safety profile.

Impact of liver fibrosis on effects and adverse effects of unresectable colorectal cancer under first line chemotherapy including CPT-11.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 556-556
Author(s):  
Masashi Yahagi ◽  
Masashi Tsuruta ◽  
Hirotoshi Hasegawa ◽  
Koji Okabayashi ◽  
Ryo Seishima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Liver Dysfunction ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

556 Background: Liver dysfunction is one of the irritating adverse effects in chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. Polymorphisms of UGTIA1, which is related to metabolism of CPT-11 in the liver, cause severe adverse events. In addition, long-term induction of CPT-11 may involve steatohepatitis. Thus, it is critical to surrogate liver dysfunction in chemotherapy including CPT-11. In this current study, we evaluated whether NAHLD fibrosis score (NFS) which is liver fibrosis marker of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, is feasible for predicting the effects and adverse events of chemotherapy including CPT-11 for colorectal cancer. Methods: From January 2007 to May 2013, of 118 patients who were diagnosed with unresectable advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer in our hospital, we retrospectively analyzed 89 patients who underwent first line chemotherapy including CPT-11. We statistically analyzed the value of the pretreatment NFS on response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and hematologic or non-hematologic toxicity of chemotherapy including CPT-11. Results: The median NFS was -1.302 (range=-5.158 to 2.62). Multivariate analysis revealed that NFS was an independent negative predictive marker for RR (coef -0.373 (-0.712 to -0.035), p = 0.031), although no contribution of NFS was observed to PFS (coef 0.958(0.786|1.168), p=0.672). In terms of the adverse events, high value of NFS is an independent risk factor in hematological toxicity (coef 0.93 (0.20 to 1.65), p = 0.012), while not in non-hematological toxicity (coef 0.198 (-0.218|0.613), p=0.351). Conclusions: The pretreatment NFS might be a feasible for predicting response and hematological toxicity in first line chemotherapy including CPT-11 against colorectal cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document