Identifying gaps in the coverage of survivorship care services.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6583-6583
Author(s):  
Anne Hudson Blaes ◽  
Maysa M. Abu-Khalaf ◽  
Catherine M. Bender ◽  
Susan Faye Dent ◽  
Chunkit Fung ◽  
...  

6583 Background: Despite advancements in reimbursement, anecdotal evidence suggests patients are not able to access guideline concordant survivorship care services due to a lack of coverage by payers. We present the results of a mixed methods study aimed to determine the practice-reported rates and sources of delay/denial on evidence-based, guideline concordant survivorship care services. Methods: A quantitative survey was developed by ASCO’s Cancer Survivorship Committee (CSC) to assess which services are being denied by payers for coverage/reimbursement. Questions were limited to disease sites for which practice guidelines exist. 533 ASCO members who provide survivorship care were surveyed, with a focus on obtaining representation from rural/urban, academic/private practice, pediatric/adult, and geographic location across the U.S. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted in October and November 2020 with geographic sub sample representation to further explore the nature of and extent to which coverage barriers are experienced for guideline-concordant care, specific to the provider or clinic’s primary disease site or specialty. Results: 120 responses from 50 states were included. Respondents were primarily clinicians (88%) with the majority treating patients with Medicare/Medicaid/CHIP (60%), followed by private/employer insurance (38%). There was little issue with coverage of hormone therapies. One-third reported issues some of the time with maintenance chemotherapy (38%) and immunotherapy (35%). Coverage denials for screening for recurrence for breast cancer (MRI, 63.5%), Hodgkin Lymphoma (PET/CT 47%; Breast MRI, 44.4%), and lung cancer (Low-dose CT 37.4%) were common. Half of the survey respondents reported denials for supportive care/symptom management services (Table). Private or employer-based insurance denials were most often the source of barriers (57.7%). Through interviews, denials were found to be the same across sites and not unique to a single payer or region. Most had a process to appeal denials for evidence-based services. Conclusions: Denial for survivorship care, particularly supportive care services, is common. There is a need for better advocacy with payers, improved policy, and support for providers/practices to implement protocols to obtain coverage for services, particularly in the face of burnout.[Table: see text]

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 200-200
Author(s):  
Julia Rabin ◽  
Katharine Quain ◽  
Nora Horick ◽  
Garrett Chinn ◽  
Allison McDonough ◽  
...  

200 Background: Despite the recognized need for high quality survivorship care, barriers to identifying and addressing patients’ needs still remain. We sought to evaluate cancer survivor care priorities, awareness of available services, and factors associated with care and informational needs. Methods: A needs assessment survey was distributed to patients presenting for routine follow-up care in adult oncology clinics at the MGH Cancer Center between February and August of 2016. The survey assessed sociodemographic characteristics, and preferences for care and communication. Care priorities were selected from a list of options including open ended response. Discussion of supportive care services was assessed by the item “have any of your providers informed you about the types of supportive care services that are available to cancer patients" with response options of “yes,” “no” or “don’t know.” Results: Among 637 total respondents, 339 patients with early stage cancer completed the survey. The majority of participants were between 50-69 years old (54%), white (89%), female (64%), and college educated (80%). Breast (32%) and hematological malignancies (21%) were the most prevalent diagnoses. Commonly endorsed priorities for care included: emotional concerns related to cancer (40%), strategies to increase self-care (33%), and management of physical cancer symptoms (30%). Demographic and clinical factors associated with endorsing emotional concerns as a care priority included female gender, and moderate or greater levels of fatigue, depression, or anxiety (all p< 0.01). Factors associated with endorsing management of physical cancer symptoms as a care priority included younger age, and moderate or greater levels of fatigue or depression (all p≤0.01). Despite these priorities for care, only 41% of patients reported receiving information from providers about available supportive care services. Conclusions: Cancer survivors’ preferences for emotional support and symptom management are strongly associated with self-reported depression and fatigue. Routine screening for these issues and improvement in communication regarding available services should be prioritized in survivorship care.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14-14
Author(s):  
Rachée Hatfield ◽  
Rupa Ghosh-Berkebile ◽  
Denise Schimming ◽  
Kristine Browning ◽  
Kristina Mathey ◽  
...  

14 Background: Holistic oncology care combines cancer treatment with supportive care to meet the physical and psychosocial needs of the cancer survivor. Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) are prepared to deliver high-quality, comprehensive oncology care and are vital to survivorship care as the number of cancer survivors continues to rise. At a Midwest Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC), an APP oncology-specific fellowship is an innovative year-long postgraduate clinical training program. For the first time, a 2 week rotation through this CCC’s survivorship department will be piloted to provide the fellow with a basic immersion into survivorship care. Methods: APP oncology fellowship graduates completed an open ended survey. They were asked to reflect on their experiences during the fellowship and provide feedback on how to improve course content, and resources that are essential to the delivery of survivorship care. APPs within the survivorship department and the APP fellowship lead educator were asked what objectives they thought were important to be met. Results: APPs fellowship graduates desired to learn more about the philosophy of survivorship care, latent and long term side effect management, creation and delivery of a treatment summary and survivorship care plan (TS/SCP), and specific strategies for executing a meaningful survivorship care visit. Networking with oncology providers was also important. Survivorship department APPs and the fellowship lead thought it was important to know how to do a holistic and supportive care assessment, create a TS/SCP, interpret and manage a distress screening tool and make appropriate supportive care referrals. Conclusions: Cancer survivorship is an integral part of holistic oncology care. As the number of cancer survivors continues to increase, so does the need for supportive care services throughout the cancer continuum. Feedback from those surveyed was used to help develop a survivorship specific curriculum for APP oncology fellows. Educating future APPs in the principles of survivorship care and available supportive care services will result in expert clinicians in survivorship care, and improve overall well-being and quality of life of cancer survivors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Murray ◽  
D. Sivajohanathan ◽  
T. P. Hanna ◽  
S. Bradshaw ◽  
N. Solish ◽  
...  

Objective The purpose of the present work was to develop evidence-based indications for Mohs micrographic surgery in patients with a diagnosis of skin cancer.Methods The guideline was developed by Cancer Care Ontario’s Program in Evidence-Based Care, together with the Melanoma Disease Site Group and the Surgical Oncology Program, through a systematic review of relevant literature, patient- and caregiver-specific consultation, and internal and external reviews.Recommendation 1 Given a lack of high-quality, comparative evidence, surgery (with postoperative or intraoperative margin assessment) or radiation (for those who are ineligible for surgery) should remain the standard of care for patients with skin cancer.Recommendation 2 Mohs micrographic surgery is recommended for patients with histologically confirmed recurrent basal cell carcinoma of the face and is appropriate for primary basal cell carcinomas of the face that are larger than 1 cm, have aggressive histology, or are located on the H zone of the face.Recommendation 3 Mohs micrographic surgery should be performed by physicians who have completed a degree in medicine or equivalent, including a Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Specialist Certificate or equivalent, and have received advanced training in Mohs micrographic surgery.


Praxis ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 91 (34) ◽  
pp. 1352-1356
Author(s):  
Harder ◽  
Blum

Cholangiokarzinome oder cholangiozelluläre Karzinome (CCC) sind seltene Tumoren des biliären Systems mit einer Inzidenz von 2–4/100000 pro Jahr. Zu ihnen zählen die perihilären Gallengangskarzinome (Klatskin-Tumore), mit ca. 60% das häufigste CCC, die peripheren (intrahepatischen) Cholangiokarzinome, das Gallenblasenkarzinom, die Karzinome der extrahepatischen Gallengänge und das periampulläre Karzinom. Zum Zeitpunkt der Diagnose ist nur bei etwa 20% eine chirurgische Resektion als einzige kurative Therapieoption möglich. Die Lebertransplantation ist wegen der hohen Rezidivrate derzeit nicht indiziert. Die Prognose von nicht resektablen Cholangiokarzinomen ist mit einer mittleren Überlebenszeit von sechs bis acht Monaten schlecht. Eine wirksame Therapie zur Verlängerung der Überlebenszeit existiert aktuell nicht. Die wichtigste Massnahme im Rahmen der «best supportive care» ist die Beseitigung der Cholestase (endoskopisch, perkutan oder chirurgisch), um einer Cholangitis oder Cholangiosepsis vorzubeugen. Durch eine systemische Chemotherapie lassen sich Ansprechraten von ca. 20% erreichen. 5-FU und Gemcitabine sind die derzeit am häufigsten eingesetzten Substanzen, die mit einer perkutanen oder endoluminalen Bestrahlung kombiniert werden können. Multimodale Therapiekonzepte können im Einzellfall erfolgreich sein, müssen jedoch erst in Evidence-Based-Medicine-gerechten Studien evaluiert werden, bevor Therapieempfehlungen für die Praxis formuliert werden können.


Author(s):  
Sonja Heinzelmann ◽  
Daniel Böhringer ◽  
Philip Christian Maier ◽  
Berthold Seitz ◽  
Claus Cursiefen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Penetrating keratoplasty (PK) gets more and more reserved to cases of increasing complexity. In such cases, ocular comorbidities may limit graft survival following PK. A major cause for graft failure is endothelial graft rejection. Suture removal is a known risk factor for graft rejection. Nevertheless, there is no evidence-based regimen for rejection prophylaxis following suture removal. Therefore, a survey of rejection prophylaxis was conducted at 7 German keratoplasty centres. Objective The aim of the study was documentation of the variability of medicinal aftercare following suture removal in Germany. Methods Seven German keratoplasty centres with the highest numbers for PK were selected. The centres were sent a survey consisting of half-open questions. The centres performed a mean of 140 PK in 2018. The return rate was 100%. The findings were tabulated. Results All centres perform a double-running cross-stitch suture for standard PK, as well as a treatment for rejection prophylaxis with topical steroids after suture removal. There are differences in intensity (1 – 5 times daily) and tapering (2 – 20 weeks) of the topical steroids following suture removal. Two centres additionally use systemic steroids for a few days. Discussion Rejection prophylaxis following PK is currently poorly standardised and not evidence-based. All included centres perform medical aftercare following suture removal. It is assumed that different treatment strategies show different cost-benefit ratios. In the face of the diversity, a systematic analysis is required to develop an optimised regimen for all patients.


2021 ◽  
pp. 174077452098486
Author(s):  
Charles Weijer ◽  
Karla Hemming ◽  
Spencer Phillips Hey ◽  
Holly Fernandez Lynch

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the challenges of evidence-based health policymaking, as critical precautionary decisions, such as school closures, had to be made urgently on the basis of little evidence. As primary and secondary schools once again close in the face of surging infections, there is an opportunity to rigorously study their reopening. School-aged children appear to be less affected by COVID-19 than adults, yet schools may drive community transmission of the virus. Given the impact of school closures on both education and the economy, schools cannot remain closed indefinitely. But when and how can they be reopened safely? We argue that a cluster randomized trial is a rigorous and ethical way to resolve these uncertainties. We discuss key scientific, ethical, and resource considerations both to inform trial design of school reopenings and to prompt discussion of the merits and feasibility of conducting such a trial.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Chesi ◽  
Natale Vazzana ◽  
Claudio Giumelli

Sepsis is a complication of severe infection associated with high mortality and open diagnostic issues. Treatment strategies are currently limited and essentially based on prompt recognition, aggressive supportive care and early antibiotic treatment. In the last years, extensive antibiotic use has led to selection, propagation and maintenance of drug-resistant microorganisms. In this context, several biomarkers have been proposed for early identification, etiological definition, risk stratification and improving antibiotic stewardship in septic patient care. Among these molecules, only a few have been translated into clinical practice. In this review, we provided an updated overview of established and developing biomarkers for sepsis, focusing our attention on their pathophysiological profile, advantages, limitations, and appropriate evidence-based use in the management of septic patients.


2009 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-35
Author(s):  
George Ehringer ◽  
Barbara Duffy

ABSTRACT Defining how preprinted physician orders are developed within a hospital has the potential to positively affect care, services, reimbursement, safety and patient outcome. When they are well designed, preprinted physician orders have the potential to improve interdisciplinary integration in care, promote accurate communication and reduce variation by combining pertinent reminders, safety alerts and “best practice” into a just-in-time process. Whether in electronic or paper format, preprinted physician orders can transform evidence-based knowledge into practice.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. 887-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Feudtner ◽  
D. A. Christakis ◽  
F. J. Zimmerman ◽  
J. H. Muldoon ◽  
J. M. Neff ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Amanda Halliwell

The Care Quality Commission's eighth COVID-19 insight report continues to highlight how providers are coping in the face of the pandemic. This time, the focus is on emergency care services. Amanda Halliwell investigates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document