Final analysis of overall survival (OS) and relapse-free-survival (RFS) in the intergroup S1404 phase III randomized trial comparing either high-dose interferon (HDI) or ipilimumab to pembrolizumab in patients with high-risk resected melanoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9501-9501
Author(s):  
Kenneth F. Grossmann ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Sapna Pradyuman Patel ◽  
Ahmad A. Tarhini ◽  
Vernon K. Sondak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Investigational Drug ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Node Positive Disease ◽  
Adequate Surgery

9501 Background: We assessed whether or not adjuvant pembrolizumab given over 1 year would improve OS and RFS in comparison to high dose ipilimumab (ipi10) or HDI - the two FDA-approved adjuvant treatments for high risk resected melanoma at the time of study design. Methods: Patients age 18 or greater with resected stages IIIA(N2), B, C and IV were eligible. Patients with CNS metastasis were excluded. At entry, patients must have had complete staging and adequate surgery to render them free of melanoma including completion lymph node dissection for those with sentinel node positive disease. Prior therapy with PD-1 blockade, ipilimumab or interferon was not allowed. Two treatment arms were assigned based on stratification by stage, PD-L1 status (positive vs. negative vs. unknown), and intended control arm (HDI vs. Ipi10). Patients enrolled between 10/2015 and 8/2017 were randomized 1:1 to either the control arm [(1) interferon alfa-2b 20 MU/m2 IV days 1-5, weeks 1-4, followed by 10 MU/m2/d SC days 1, 3, and 5, weeks 5-52 (n=190), or (2) ipilimumab 10 mg/kg IV q3w for 4 doses, then q12w for up to 3 years (n=465)], or the experimental arm [pembrolizumab 200 mg IV q3w for 52 weeks (n=648)]. The study had three primary comparisons: 1) RFS among all patients, 2) OS among all patients, 3) OS among patients with PD-L1+ baseline biopsies. Results: 1,426 patients were screened and 1,345 patients were randomized with 11%, 49%, 34%, and 6% AJCC7 stage IIIA(N2), IIIB, IIIC and IV, respectively. This final analysis was performed per-protocol 3.5 years from the date the last patient was randomized, with 512 RFS and 199 OS events. The pembrolizumab group had a statistically significant improvement in RFS compared to the control group (pooled HDI and ipi10) with HR 0.740 (99.618% CI, 0.571 to 0.958). There was no statistically signifcant improvement in OS in the 1,303 eligible randomized overall patient population with HR 0.837 (96.3% CI, 0.622 to 1.297), or among the 1,070 (82%) patients with PD-L1 positive baseline biopsies with HR 0.883 (97.8% CI, 0.604 to 1.291). Gr 3/4/5 event rates were as follows: HDI 69/9/0%, ipi10 43/5/0.5% and pembrolizumab 17/2/0.3%. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab improves RFS but not OS compared to HDI or ipi10 in the adjuvant treatment of patients with high-risk resected melanoma. Pembrolizumab is a better tolerated adjuvant treatment regimen than HDI or Ipi10. Support: NIH/NCI NCTN grants CA180888, CA180819, CA180820, CA180863; and in part by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Editorial Acknowledgement: With special thanks to Elad Sharon, MD, MPH, and Larissa Korde, MD, MPH. National Cancer Institute, Investigational Drug Branch, for their contributions to this trial, as well as Nageatte Ibrahim, MD, and Sama Ahsan, MD Merck. Clinical trial information: NCT02506153.

A GITIL Prospective Randomized Multicenter Phase III Study of High Dose Sequential Chemotherapy with Rituximab (R-HDS) and Autologous Transplantation (ASCT) of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Versus CHOP and Rituximab Delivered Every 14 Days (R-CHOP-14) in High-Risk Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas (DLBCL): Interim Analysis on Feasibility and Toxicity (Protocol R-HDS 0305).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1898-1898
Author(s):  
Sergio Cortelazzo ◽  
Atto Billio ◽  
Alessandro Rambaldi ◽  
Corrado Tarella ◽  
Ingnazio Majolino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Bulky Disease ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Ecog Ps

Abstract R-HDS 0305 (Clinical Trials. gov. number NCT00355199) is a multi-centre, unblinded, randomized controlled phase III trial involving 240 patients in 3 years from 16 Italian Cancer Centres, with DLBCL without CNS involvement, advanced stage (stage ≥IIB, bulk), age from 18 to 60 years with ECOG-PS=0–3 and aaIPI=2–3 or age from 61 to 65 years with ECOG-PS=0–2 and IPI 3–5. The control group received R-CHOP-14, which comprised 8 courses of chemotherapy every 14 days, supported by GCSF (day 7–11)±IFRT, if they achieved at least a PR after 4 cycles. Cases refractory to R-CHOP-14 were given R-HDS as salvage therapy. Experimental arm consisted in a R-HDS program, including a debulking phase of 3 courses of doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy (APO), followed by high-dose (HD)-cyclophosphamide (CTX) 7g/sqm, HD-Ara-C (2 g/sqm every 12 hours for 6 days), HD-etoposide 2g/sqm+Cisplatin 100 mg/sqm. After HDS chemotherapy, HD-mitoxantrone plus melphalan (60 and 180 mg/sqm) or a BEAM (BCNU 300 mg/sqm, etoposide 200 mg/sqm, Ara-C 4000 mg/sqm, L-PAM 140 mg/sqm) conditioning regimen with ASCT±IFRT was planned. Rituximab (375 mg/sqm) is given for a total of 6 doses, twice after HD-CTX and HD-Ara-C, as in vivo purging before CD34+ cells harvest, and twice after ASCT. The primary outcomes of the study are complete remission and disease-free survival, overall survival, event-free survival and toxicity. From July 2005 to July 2007, 89 patients were enrolled in the study (R-CHOP-14=43; R-HDS=46). The median age was 51 (range 19–65 years), 11 (12%) had ≥60 years and the M/F was 1.3. Patients presented with adverse features such as advanced stage (88%), BM infiltration (28%), bulky disease (71%), elevated LDH (84%), poor ECOG-PS (55%) and >1 extranodal sites (59%). Until now only 3 patients (3.4%) were refractory to planned treatment: 1/43 (2%) patients belonging to R-CHOP-14 arm shifted to R-HDS salvage treatment and other 2 patients died from lymphoma progression. The main G 3–4 WHO toxicity was haematological: anemia, granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 8%, 18% and 13% of patients, respectively. Grade 2–3 gastrointestinal toxicity and infectious episodes were recorded in 6% and 9% of patients, respectively. Two patients recovered from acute respiratory distress and 2 died of treatment-related toxicity (2.2%). In conclusion, if the R-HDS trial confirms earlier results, preliminary data show that intensive programs such as dose-dense chemo-immunotherapy and R-HDS with ASCT are feasible until 65 years with an acceptable toxic profile, also on the multi-centre basis. At completion of the trial we will assess the role of R-HDS and ASCT on the outcome of high-risk patients with DLBCL.

High-Dose Interferon Alfa-2b Does Not Diminish Antibody Response to GM2 Vaccination in Patients With Resected Melanoma: Results of the Multicenter Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase II Trial E2696

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 1430-1436 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Kirkwood ◽  
Joseph Ibrahim ◽  
David H. Lawson ◽  
Michael B. Atkins ◽  
Sanjiv S. Agarwala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interferon Alfa ◽  
Immunoglobulin M ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Risk Melanoma ◽  
Risk Melanoma ◽  
High Dose Interferon ◽  
Very High

PURPOSE: High-dose interferon alfa-2b (IFNα2b) is the only established adjuvant therapy of resectable high-risk melanoma. GM2-KLH/QS-21 (GMK) is a chemically defined vaccine that is one of the best developed of a range of vaccine candidates for melanoma. A single-institution phase III trial conducted at Memorial Hospital served as the impetus for an intergroup adjuvant E1694/S9512/C509801 trial, which recently completed enrollment of 880 patients. To build on the apparent benefit of IFNα2b in resectable high-risk American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IIB or III melanoma, this phase II study was designed to evaluate the combination of GMK and IFNα2b. The E2696 trial was undertaken to evaluate the toxicity and other effects of the established adjuvant high-dose IFNα2b regimen in relation to immune responses to GMK and to evaluate the potential clinical and immunologic effects of the combined therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This trial enrolled 107 patients with resectable high- or very high–risk melanoma (AJCC stages IIB, III, and IV). RESULTS: The results demonstrate that IFNα2b does not significantly inhibit immunoglobulin M or G serologic responses to the vaccine and that the combination of high-dose IFNα2b and GMK is well tolerated in this patient population. CONCLUSION: Cox analysis of the results of the combination with IFNα2b show improvement in the relapse-free survival of patients with very high–risk melanoma (including those with resectable M1 disease).

A Pilot Clinical Trial of Surgical Adjuvant Treatment with High-Dose 6S-Leucovorin/5-Fluorouracil and Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Rectal Carcinoma

1994 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 335-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Cascinu ◽  
Antonio Veraldi ◽  
Gian Paolo Foglietti ◽  
Roberto Ghiselli ◽  
Vittorio Saba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Rectal Carcinoma ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Radiotherapy Alone ◽  
The Mean

Aims and background The study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of combining leucovorin (LV) with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and radiation therapy as adjuvant treatment for high-risk rectal carcinoma. Methods Twenty-five patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum, at high-risk of recurrence after potentially curative resection (T3 NO, T any N1-2; MO), received 5FU (370 mg/m2) and 6S-LV (100 mg/m2) on days 1-5, 4 and 8 weeks after surgery. On treatment day 64, radiotherapy on the pelvis (50 Gy) was initiated. Finally, three further courses of 5FU/LV were given at intervals of 4 weeks beginning 28 days after the completion of radiotherapy. Results The treatment was generally well tolerated. We observed only 2 cases of grade III toxicity (diarrhea) during the third cycle of chemotherapy. No severe complications were recorded following the use of radiotherapy. The mean overall 5FU dose intensity was 92%. After a median follow-up of 24 months, 4 patients had relapsed (liver, lung, and pelvis, 2 cases). Conclusions The association of LV to 5FU and radiation therapy seems to be feasible, with acceptable toxicity. The advantage of this combination, in terms of recurrence rate and survival with respect to 5FU/radiotherapy alone, will have to be evaluated in randomized trials.

Imatinib 800 mg: Preliminary Results of a Phase II Trial of the GIMEMA CML Working Party in Intermediate Sokal Risk Patients and Status-of-the-Art of an Ongoing Multinational, Prospective Randomized Trial of Imatinib Standard Dose (400 mg Daily) vs High Dose (800 mg Daily) in High Sokal Risk Patients.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1098-1098
Author(s):  
Gianantonio Rosti ◽  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Nicoletta Testoni ◽  
Giorgina Specchia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract The conventional treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in early chronic phase (ECP) is imatinib 400 mg daily. The estimated rates of major (MCgR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCgR) at 42 months are 91% and 84%, respectively (IRIS Trial - F Guilhot, ASH 2004), with a survival free from accelerated and blastic phase of 84%. The rates of CCgR are significantly different according to Sokal score, being 91%, 84% and 69% for low, intermediate and high risk categories. Phase I and II trials of imatinib have clearly shown a dose-response effect; more importantly, a single center phase II trial of imatinib 800 mg in ECP showed significantly better results vs standard dose, in terms of CCgR (90% vs 74%) and of complete molecular response (28% vs 7% at 18 months) [H. Kantarjian et al, Blood 103 (8), 2004]. The GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell’Adulto) CML WP is conducting a phase II trial of imatinib 800 mg in intermediate Sokal risk in ECP (trial CML/021). Overall, 89 pts (mean age 53 yrs) have been enrolled. Fourty-four patients completed 6 months of treatment: the complete hematological response rate is 100%; the MCgR and CCgR are 90% and 81%, respectively. The 6 months CCgR rate of this trial parallels the IRIS trial one in intermediate risk cases (84%), with a much shorter treatment period. The major molecular response rate at 6 months (RTQ-PCR as ratio BCR-ABL/ABL) is 56% (cut-off ≤ 0.12%) or 41% (cut-off ≤0.05%). The compliance to the treatment improved time by time, being 47% the patients receiving ≥ 80% of the scheduled dose between months 1–3 and 60% between months 4 - 6. A second project, exploring imatinib high dose, is reserved to high risk cases: a multinational working group, within the frame of Leukemianet CML WP, is conducting a phase III randomized trial (1:1) of imatinib 400 mg vs 800 mg in high Sokal risk in ECP. By July 31, 2005, 80 patients have been enrolled: GIMEMA CML WP (44 pts), Nordic Countries - Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland (25 pts), Turkey (10 pts) and Israel (1 pt).

Outcome of Children with T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL) and Standard Risk (SR) Features: Results of CCG-1952, CCG-1991 and POG 9404.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 680-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yousif Matloub ◽  
B.L. Asselin ◽  
Linda C. Stork ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
Harland Sather ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Intensive Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Intensified Chemotherapy ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Children with T-ALL have generally had a poorer prognosis than patients with precursor-B ALL. Patients with T-ALL are more likely than those with B-precursor ALL to be > 9 years and present with WBC > 50,000/ul, bulky lymphadenopathy and mediastinal mass. Since 1996, the former CCG has stratified protocol eligibility for patients with ALL based on NCI defined Standard Risk (SR = age between 1-9.99 years; WBC < 50,000/ul) or High Risk (HR) groups, regardless of immunophenotype. In contrast, the former POG has treated all T-cell patients on protocols separate from those for precursor-B ALL. This report compares the outcomes among children with T-cell ALL treated on recently completed or ongoing CCG and POG phase III trials for ALL. CCG-1952 enrolled 2176 eligible children with SR ALL between 1996 and 2000; 106 (5%) had T-cell immunophenotype. Treatment was a standard BFM regimen with prednisone and 2 phases of delayed intensification (DI) with a 2x2 randomization of IT methotrexate (MTX) v ITT and MP v TG. From June 2000 to March 2004, CCG-1991 has enrolled 1794 SR ALL patients: 80 (4%) had T-ALL. Treatment included a similar BFM backbone with substitution of dexamethasone and a 2x2 randomization between escalating IV v oral MTX and 1 v 2 DIs. POG-9404 (opened 1996; closed 2001) was developed exclusively for T-cell disease and enrolled 363 patients with T-ALL; 84 (23%) fit the NCI SR group criteria. On the latter protocol, patients received treatment similar to that developed by the Dana-Farber Leukemia Consortium for high risk B-precursor ALL, with randomization to ± 4 cycles of high dose MTX (5 Gm/m2) and leucovorin. All patients on 9404 received 1800 cGy prophylactic cranial radiation while CCG patients did not. Outcome for T-ALL on CCG-1952 is substantially worse than for B-precursor ALL, with 5 year event-free survival (EFS) of 73% compared to 82% (p = 0.007). Interim analysis of CCG-1991 also shows a significantly worse outcome for T-ALL compared to B-precursor ALL: 3y estimated EFS 78% v 90%, p = 0.0002. In contrast, estimated 5y EFS for patients with SR T-ALL on POG-9404 is 88% (90% on the superior high dose MTX regimen). Comparison of the SR v HR T-ALL patients treated on POG 9404 shows a significant advantage for the SR group (5y EFS of 90% v 75%, p < 0.004). This is in contrast to comparison of T-ALL patients on CCG-1952 (SR) v the concurrent CCG-1961 HR study where T-ALL patients have similar outcome (5y EFS 73% v 72%, p = 0.77). These data suggest that patients with T-ALL and SR features have better EFS when treated with more intensified chemotherapy regimens. Because early EFS for T-cell patients treated on CCG-1991 is worse than on POG 9404, the former study was closed to further accrual of patients with T-ALL. The COG ALL Committee is developing a study for exclusive enrollment of patients with T-ALL using intensive therapy based on the current COG HR ALL regimen, regardless of SR or HR features.

Phase III Randomized Stem Cell Mobilization Trial Comparing Standard Vs Double-Dose G-CSF Vs Standard Doses of G-CSF Plus GM-CSF in Hard to Mobilize Patients Undergoing An Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3228-3228
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Berger ◽  
Christopher Seet ◽  
Mala Parthasarathy ◽  
Tulio Rodriguez ◽  
Scott E. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract Abstract 3228 Poster Board III-165 Introduction Using standard dose G-CSF (10 μg/kg) for stem cell mobilization, 25-40% of patients, deemed to be hard to mobilize based on prior therapy, will not collect sufficient HSC (> 2-2.5 × 106 CD34/kg) to proceed to a prompt autotransplant. Strategies to improve CD34/kg yields have included dose escalating G-CSF up to 30 μg/kg or combining G-CSF and GM-CSF. While dose escalated G-CSF is effective in increasing CD34 yields in normal donors as is the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF, their comparative value in pre-treated patients has not been tested. To determine the value of these strategies, we performed a randomized comparison of high dose G-CSF (30 μg/kg as 2 doses 12 hours apart), to the combination of simultaneous single daily doses of G-CSF (10 μg/kg) plus GM-CSF (5 μg/kg), to a control group receiving G-CSF at an equivalent total dose of cytokine to the combination arm (15μg/kg) as a single dose. Patients and Methods Patients were eligible if heavily pre-treated, defined as: a minimum of 10 total cycles of combination chemotherapy and two prior regimens, or a total of 6 chemotherapy cycles if the patient also received RT to marrow bearing sites, platinum-based chemotherapy or 2 or more cycles of any BCNU or fludarabine containing regimen. Baseline WBC had to be > 3000/μl, ANC > 1500/μl and a platelets > 100,000/μl. Twelve liter aphereses began on day 5 of mobilization, and continued until ≥ 4 × 106 CD34/kg were collected or a maximum of 5 aphereses. Patients typically proceeded to transplant if they had ≥ 2.5 × 106 CD34/kg collected and were always re-mobilized if they collected < 2.0 × 106 CD34/kg. CD34 subsets (CD34+/CD33- and CD34+/CD38-) were also assessed for the 3 groups to determine if more primitive HSC were mobilized by the 2 novel strategies. The sample size was calculated based as follows: 60% of the control group would collect 2.5 × 106 CD34/kg and this would rise to 90% in one or both study arms. The detection of such differences with a power of 80% and a 2-sided alpha level of 0.025 required a total sample of 120 patients. Results A total of 120 patients were randomized; 119 were eligible. Patient demographics, shown in the Table, were matched among the three groups: The % of patients collecting ≥2.5 × 106 CD34/kg was: standard G: 60%, high dose G: 57% (p = 1.0), G + GM: 41% (p = 0.1). Median CD34 collected in first mobilization were, 3.6 × 106/kg, 3.0 × 106/kg (p = 0.22) and 2.0 × 106/kg (p = 0.05) respectively in a median of 4, 4, and 5 aphereses (p = NS). Re-mobilization rates: standard G; 37.5%, high dose G: 35%; G + GM: 50% (p = NS). Total median CD34 collected from first and any second mobilizations were: standard G: 4.8 × 106/kg, high dose G: 3.9 × 106/kg, and G + GM: 3.5 × 106/kg. One patient in the standard G arm and 3 in high dose G did not proceed to transplant due to poor initial mobilization and progression in 2, and one each for progression or poor mobilization alone. There were no significant differences in median engraftment times: for ANC, 10, 11 and 15 days respectively for the standard G-, high dose G- and G + GM arms and for platelets, 11, 13 and 14 days respectively. The overall survivals @ the median f/u time of 37 months were 59.8%, 61.8% and 48.1% respectively (p = 0.272) for the three groups. The % primitive HSC (CD34+/CD33- and CD34+/CD38-) from the first mobilization were identical in the 3 patient groups. Conclusions We found no advantage to dose escalated G-CSF nor to the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF to mobilize HSC for autotransplantation in heavily pre-treated patients. We also did not find higher numbers of more primitive CD34 subsets mobilized by these newer strategies. Alternative approaches, e.g. the combination of plerixifor + standard dose G-CSF (Stiff et al: BBMT; 15:249-56, 2009) would appear to be the preferred method of initial HSC mobilization for heavily pre-treated patients. Disclosures Stiff: Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Survival of patients (pts) treated with high-dose radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent chemotherapy for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7544-7544
Author(s):  
S. Schild ◽  
D. Graham ◽  
S. Hillman ◽  
S. Vora ◽  
G. Yolanda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Technological Improvements ◽  
Improve Disease Control

7544 Background: NCCTG N0028 was a trial that determined the MTD of RT that could be given with carboplatin & paclitaxel was 74 Gy/34 fractions. This secondary analysis was performed to determine the survival of pts treated on this trial. Methods: Eligible pts had medically or surgically unresectable NSCLC, PS=0–1, weight loss <10% in the prior 3 months(mo), no prior therapy, adequate laboratory & pulmonary functions. Included were 25 pts with clinical stages I (4pts), II (1 pt), IIIa (12 pts), & IIIb (8 pts). Treatment included: weekly I.V. paclitaxel (50mg/m2) & carboplatin (AUC=2) during RT. The RT included 2 Gy daily to an initial dose of 70 Gy. The total dose was increased in 4 Gy increments until the MTD was determined. RT was delivered with 3-D treatment planning but no elective nodal RT. Three pts received 70 Gy, 18 pts received 74 Gy, & 4 pts received 78Gy. Results: Pts were followed until death or from 10–67 mo (median: 28mo) in those alive at last evaluation. The median survival (MS) of the entire cohort was 42mo. The 5 stages I-II pts had a MS of 53 mo & the 20 stage III pts had MS of 42mo. Conclusions: Standard dose RT is unable to sterilize disease in the majority of pts with unresectable NSCLC. While the addition of chemotherapy has significantly improved survival of these pts, the MS is generally 15–24 mo. These preliminary results suggest higher than standard doses of RT may improve disease control & prolong survival. A phase III trial comparing standard-dose RT(60Gy) to high-dose RT (74Gy) is open and should more definitively address the issue of RT dose with concurrent chemotherapy for unresectable NSCLC. Future technological improvements in imaging & targeting will provide methods to safely administer even greater RT doses which will likely further improve disease control. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document