A GITIL Prospective Randomized Multicenter Phase III Study of High Dose Sequential Chemotherapy with Rituximab (R-HDS) and Autologous Transplantation (ASCT) of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Versus CHOP and Rituximab Delivered Every 14 Days (R-CHOP-14) in High-Risk Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas (DLBCL): Interim Analysis on Feasibility and Toxicity (Protocol R-HDS 0305).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1898-1898
Author(s):  
Sergio Cortelazzo ◽  
Atto Billio ◽  
Alessandro Rambaldi ◽  
Corrado Tarella ◽  
Ingnazio Majolino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Bulky Disease ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Ecog Ps

Abstract R-HDS 0305 (Clinical Trials. gov. number NCT00355199) is a multi-centre, unblinded, randomized controlled phase III trial involving 240 patients in 3 years from 16 Italian Cancer Centres, with DLBCL without CNS involvement, advanced stage (stage ≥IIB, bulk), age from 18 to 60 years with ECOG-PS=0–3 and aaIPI=2–3 or age from 61 to 65 years with ECOG-PS=0–2 and IPI 3–5. The control group received R-CHOP-14, which comprised 8 courses of chemotherapy every 14 days, supported by GCSF (day 7–11)±IFRT, if they achieved at least a PR after 4 cycles. Cases refractory to R-CHOP-14 were given R-HDS as salvage therapy. Experimental arm consisted in a R-HDS program, including a debulking phase of 3 courses of doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy (APO), followed by high-dose (HD)-cyclophosphamide (CTX) 7g/sqm, HD-Ara-C (2 g/sqm every 12 hours for 6 days), HD-etoposide 2g/sqm+Cisplatin 100 mg/sqm. After HDS chemotherapy, HD-mitoxantrone plus melphalan (60 and 180 mg/sqm) or a BEAM (BCNU 300 mg/sqm, etoposide 200 mg/sqm, Ara-C 4000 mg/sqm, L-PAM 140 mg/sqm) conditioning regimen with ASCT±IFRT was planned. Rituximab (375 mg/sqm) is given for a total of 6 doses, twice after HD-CTX and HD-Ara-C, as in vivo purging before CD34+ cells harvest, and twice after ASCT. The primary outcomes of the study are complete remission and disease-free survival, overall survival, event-free survival and toxicity. From July 2005 to July 2007, 89 patients were enrolled in the study (R-CHOP-14=43; R-HDS=46). The median age was 51 (range 19–65 years), 11 (12%) had ≥60 years and the M/F was 1.3. Patients presented with adverse features such as advanced stage (88%), BM infiltration (28%), bulky disease (71%), elevated LDH (84%), poor ECOG-PS (55%) and >1 extranodal sites (59%). Until now only 3 patients (3.4%) were refractory to planned treatment: 1/43 (2%) patients belonging to R-CHOP-14 arm shifted to R-HDS salvage treatment and other 2 patients died from lymphoma progression. The main G 3–4 WHO toxicity was haematological: anemia, granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 8%, 18% and 13% of patients, respectively. Grade 2–3 gastrointestinal toxicity and infectious episodes were recorded in 6% and 9% of patients, respectively. Two patients recovered from acute respiratory distress and 2 died of treatment-related toxicity (2.2%). In conclusion, if the R-HDS trial confirms earlier results, preliminary data show that intensive programs such as dose-dense chemo-immunotherapy and R-HDS with ASCT are feasible until 65 years with an acceptable toxic profile, also on the multi-centre basis. At completion of the trial we will assess the role of R-HDS and ASCT on the outcome of high-risk patients with DLBCL.

ABVD Versus Escalated Beacopp in Advanced Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results from a Retrospective, Multicenter European Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1565-1565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrizia Mondello ◽  
Irene Dogliotti ◽  
Jan-Paul Bohn ◽  
Federica Cavallo ◽  
Simone Ferrero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Purpose: Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable disease even in advanced-stage, with >90% of long-term survivors. Currently, the standard of care is ABVD (doxorubicin, etoposide, vinblastine and dacarbazine), as it is less toxic and as effective as other more intensive chemotherapy regimens. Alternatively, BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone) has been proposed as front-line intensified regimen with a better initial disease control and prolonged time to relapse when compared to ABVD. However, this advantage is associated with higher rates of severe hematologic toxicity, treatment-related deaths, secondary neoplasms and infertility. To date, the debate regarding which regimen should be preferred as first line for advanced-stage HL is still ongoing. To shed some light on this open question we compared efficacy and safety of both regimens in clinical practice. Patients and Methods: From October 2009 to October 2018, patients with HL stage III-IV treated with either ABVD or BEACOPP escalated (BEACOPPesc) were retrospectively assessed in 7 European cancer centers. Results: A total of 372 consecutive patients were included in the study. One-hundred and ten patients were treated with BEACOPPesc and 262 with ABVD. The baseline characteristics of the two groups did not differ significantly, except for a higher rate of high-risk patients in the BEACOPPesc group in contrast to the ABVD one (47% vs 18%; p= 0.003). Complete response rate (CR) assessed by PET imaging at the end of the second cycle was 67% and 78% for the ABVD and BEACOPPesc group (p= 0.003), respectively. Thirteen patients of the ABVD group achieved stable disease (SD) and 6 had a progression disease (PD). On the other hand, 4 of the patients in the BEACOPPesc group progressed, another 2 interrupted therapy because life-threatening toxicity. At the end of the therapy, CR was 76% in the ABVD group and 85% in the BEACOPPesc group (p= 0.01). A total of 20% patients in the ABVD group and 14% patients in the BEACOPPesc group received consolidation radiotherapy on the mediastinal mass at the dose of 30Gy. After radiotherapy, the number of patients with CR increased to 79% and 87% in the two groups (p= 0.041), respectively. Thirty-nine patients (35%) in the BEACOPPesc group required dose reduction of chemotherapy due to toxicity compared to 12 patients (5%; p= <0.001) in the ABVD group. Overall, the rate of severe toxicities was higher in the BEACOPPesc group in comparison with the ABVD cohort. In particular, there was a significant increased frequency of acute grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events (neutropenia 61% vs 24%; anemia 29% vs 4%; thrombocytopenia 29% vs 3%), febrile neutropenia (29% vs 3%), severe infections (18% vs 3%). Myeloid growth factors were administered to 85% and 59% of patients in the BEACOPPesc group compared to the ABVD group. Blood transfusions were required in 51% and 6% of patients in the BEACOPPesc group compared to the ABVD cohort. Progression during or shortly after treatment occurred in 5 patients in the BEACOPPesc group (4%) and in 16 patients in the ABVD group (6%; p= 0.62). Among the 96 patients who achieved a CR after BEACOPPesc and radiotherapy, 8 relapsed (8%), compared to 29 of 208 patients in the ABVD group (14%; p= 0.04). At a median follow-up period of 5 years, no statistical difference in progression free survival (PFS; p=0.11) and event-free survival (EFS; p=0.22) was observed between the BEACOPPesc and ABVD cohorts. Similarly, overall survival (OS) did not differ between the two groups (p=0.14). The baseline international prognostic score (IPS <3 vs ≥ 3) significantly influenced the EFS with an advantage for the high-risk group treated with BEACOPPesc (Figure 1A; p=0.03), but not the PFS (Figure 1B; p=0.06) and OS (Figure 1C; p=0.14). During the follow-up period, in the BEACOPPesc group one patient developed myelodysplasia and one acute leukemia. Second solid tumors developed in one patient in the ABVD group (lung cancer) and one in BEACOPPesc group (breast cancer). Conclusion: We confirm that the ABVD regimen is an effective and less toxic therapeutic option for advanced-stage HL. Although BEACOPP results in better initial tumor control especially in high-risk patients, the long-term outcome remains similar between the two regimens. Disclosures Ferrero: EUSA Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Martinelli:BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Willenbacher:European Commission: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Myelom- und Lymphomselbsthilfe Österreich: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Science: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; IQVIA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; oncotyrol: Employment, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Fujimoto: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tirol Program: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Randomized, phase III study of early intervention with venetoclax and obinutuzumab versus delayed therapy with venetoclax and obinutuzumab in newly diagnosed asymptomatic high-risk patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL): EVOLVE CLL/SLL study (SWOG S1925, NCT#04269902).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS7567-TPS7567
Author(s):  
Deborah Marie Stephens ◽  
Anna Moseley ◽  
Brian T. Hill ◽  
John M. Pagel ◽  
Mazyar Shadman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Intervention ◽  
High Risk ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

TPS7567 Background: Currently, asymptomatic patients with CLL/SLL are observed without treatment until development of symptoms or cytopenias. Historically, early intervention studies with chemoimmunotherapy have not resulted in an overall survival (OS) benefit and have resulted in toxicity. The introduction of targeted therapies, such as venetoclax and obinutuzumab (VO), have provided tolerable/efficacious options for CLL patients. In the CLL14 study, symptomatic CLL patients receiving frontline therapy with VO had longer progression-free survival (PFS) and deeper remissions [more minimal residual disease-undetectable (MRDu)] compared with those receiving chlorambucil and obinutuzumab (Fischer 2019). The CLL-International Prognostic Index (CLL-IPI; Table) is a validated prognostic model to predict which patients are highest risk for a shorter time to first therapy and shorter OS. We aim to use VO as early intervention in asymptomatic, high-risk patients with CLL to potentially lengthen OS and thus alter the natural history of the disease. Methods: On 12/14/20, we activated the S1925 study for adult patients with CLL or SLL, who were diagnosed within 12 months of enrollment. Eligible patients have a CLL-IPI score ≥ 4 (Table) or complex cytogenetics (≥3 cytogenetic abnormalities) and do not meet any criteria for initiation of treatment by the International Working Group for CLL (IWCLL; Hallek 2018) guidelines. Enrolled patients are randomized in a 2:1 manner to early versus delayed (at the time IWCLL indication for treatment is met) therapy with VO. VO is administered for a fixed duration of 12 months as previously described (Fischer 2019). The primary endpoint is OS. We hypothesize that early intervention with VO will improve the rate of 6-year OS from 60% to 80%. This design requires 222 eligible patients for 88% power (2-sided α=0.05) for the primary comparison. To allow for 10% ineligibility, we will enroll 247 patients. Estimated accrual time is 4 years. Secondary endpoints include: rates of response, PFS, and relapse-free survival; safety; time to 2nd CLL-directed therapy; and quality of life (FACT-Leukemia total score). The primary translational objective is to evaluate the prognostic association between OS and peripheral blood MRD status at 15 months after treatment initiation by flow cytometry. Additional exploratory objectives include the association of other clinical outcomes, baseline prognostic factors, and IWCLL-defined response with MRD status at multiple timepoints. Currently, enrollment is open. Clinical trial information: NCT04269902. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Randomized Trial Comparing R-CHOP Versus High-Dose Sequential Chemotherapy in High-Risk Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (33) ◽  
pp. 4015-4022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Cortelazzo ◽  
Corrado Tarella ◽  
Alessandro Massimo Gianni ◽  
Marco Ladetto ◽  
Anna Maria Barbui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
B Cell ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphomas ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Intent To Treat ◽  
Large B Cell

Purpose The benefit of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) as first-line treatment in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphomas is still a matter of debate. To address this point, we designed a randomized phase III trial to compare rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP)-14 (eight cycles) with rituximab plus high-dose sequential chemotherapy (R-HDS) with ASCT. Patients and Methods From June 2005 to June 2011, 246 high-risk patients with a high-intermediate (56%) or high (44%) International Prognostic Index score were randomly assigned to the R-CHOP or R-HDS arm, and 235 were analyzed by intent to treat. The primary efficacy end point of the study was 3-year event-free survival, and results were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis. Results Clinical response (complete response, 78% v 76%; partial response, 5% v 9%) and failures (no response, 15% v 11%; and early treatment-related mortality, 2% v 3%) were similar after R-CHOP versus R-HDS, respectively. After a median follow-up of 5 years, the 3-year event-free survival was 62% versus 65% ( P = .83). At 3 years, compared with the R-CHOP arm, the R-HDS arm had better disease-free survival (79% v 91%, respectively; P = .034), but this subsequently vanished because of late-occurring treatment-related deaths. No difference was detected in terms of progression-free survival (65% v 75%, respectively; P = .12), or overall survival (74% v 77%, respectively; P = .64). Significantly higher hematologic toxicity ( P < .001) and more infectious complications ( P < .001) were observed in the R-HDS arm. Conclusion In this study, front-line intensive R-HDS chemotherapy with ASCT did not improve the outcome of high-risk patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphomas.

CODOX-M/IVAC (NCI 89-C-41) for Children and Adolescents with Small Non-Cleaved and Large B-Cell Lymphomas. A 14 Years Monocentric Experience.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3308-3308
Author(s):  
Maria Luisa Moleti ◽  
Anna Maria Testi ◽  
Luigi Malandruccolo ◽  
Elisabetta Todisco ◽  
Edoardo Pescarmona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Over the last 14 years, at our Institute, we have used the NCI 89-C-41 protocol designed by I. Magrath in children and adolescents with small non-cleaved cell (SNCL) and large B-cell (LBCL) lymphomas. In the 1996 paper (J Clin Oncol 1996, 14: 925–34), Magrath et al reported an event-free survival of 92% at 2 years, in adults and children with SNCL. In this protocol, patients with a single extra-abdominal mass or completely resected abdominal disease and LDH <350 IU/L are classified as low-risk; all other patients are defined as high-risk. Low-risk patients receive 3 cycles of the CODOX-M regimen, a combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone, vincristine, high-dose methotrexate and intrathecal therapy. High-risk patients receive 4 alternating CODOX-M and IVAC regimens. The IVAC protocol includes ifosfamide, etoposide, high-dose cytarabine and intrathecal methotrexate. We describe hereby the results obtained in 35 patients younger than 21 years with SNCL and LCBL, seronegative for the HIV, treated with the NCI 89-C-41 protocol between September 1989 and March 2003 at our Institute. Median age at presentation was 12.1 years, ranging form 2.6 to 21 years. Thirty patients had SNCL and 5 LBCL. According to Murphy’s staging system, 17 were classified as stage II, 9 as stage III and 9 as stage IV (all with bone marrow involvement that was >25% in 3; 1 with associated CNS disease). Two patients were defined as low risk, while 33 were high-risk. The CNS+ patient received additional IT therapy. G-CSF was given in case of neutropenia associated to severe infections. Thirty-two of the 35 patients (91%) achieved a CR. The remaining 3 patients (SNCL, stages II, III and IV) obtained a PR after the first 2 cycles, but the disease rapidly progressed and led to death in all 3. One patient with stage IV SNCL died in CR of fungal meningitis, during the fourth cycle neutropenia. Three complete responders (SNCL, stage III) relapsed after 2, 2 and 33 months from the end of therapy. Only 1 of them is alive and well in second CR after a stem cell transplant. A life-threatening tumor lysis syndrome was observed in 2 patients; metabolic alterations caused seizures in 1 of them that resolved without sequelae. The hematological toxicity was acceptable; in low-risk patients no thrombocytopenias were observed and neutropenia lasted from 0 to 3 days. For high-risk patients, the median time to PMN >0.5 x 109/L after each cycle was 7, 6, 6 and 6 days (range 0–19), respectively, and to PLTS >50 x 109/L was 6 days (range 0–36). Infections were observed only in high-risk patients with 13 bacterial sepsis, 1 disseminated fungal infection and 12 localized infections. Mucositis (WHO >2) was the main extra-hematological side-effect occurring usually after the CODOX-M regimen; transient peripheral neuropathy occurred in 4 patients after the CODOX-M cycle. No acute and late liver, pulmonary and cardiac toxicities were registered. The 7-years overall survival and event free-survival are 83 and 80%. The results of our study indicate that the NCI 89-C-41 protocol, originally designed for SNCL patients, has confirmed its feasibility and documented its long-term efficacy in a series of children and adolescents with both SNCL and LBCL managed at a single center and with a median follow-up extended to 10 years.

High Dose Intensive Chemotherapy, as Is Standard in Childhood Leukemia, Is Feasible and Efficacious in Adult Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) up to the Age of 40: Results From the Dutch-Belgian HOVON-70 Study.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 323-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W Rijneveld ◽  
B. van der Holt ◽  
S. M. G. J. Daenen ◽  
B. J. Biemond ◽  
A. A van de Loosdrecht ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Treatment Regimen ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cell Phenotype ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Abstract 323 Event-free survival (EFS) at 5 years in pediatric ALL is > 80% with dose intensive multi-agent chemotherapy. In contrast, adult ALL still has an unsatisfactory outcome, which may partly be due to less cumulative dosing of chemotherapeutic agents and less strict adherence to timing of successive cycles of chemotherapy. Given the earlier reported feasibility of pediatric schedules in adolescent patients, the HOVON group performed a prospective multicenter phase II trial to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of an intensified treatment regimen in adult patients with newly diagnosed ALL aged 18–40 years. The treatment regimen was based on the French FRALLE-2000 protocol, including dose intensification for steroids, vincristine, L-asparaginase, and high dose methotrexate (MTX). Fifty-four patients, median age 26 years (range 17–39) were enrolled in 15 centres in the Netherlands and Belgium between December 2005 and August 2007. After a prednisolon prephase and a multidrug remission-induction (prednisolon, daunorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and L-asparaginase), patients received consolidation containing 5000 mg/m2 MTX twice, two intensifications with intensified L-asparaginase, interspersed by an interphase with again two times high dose MTX, and maintenance chemotherapy (oral MTX and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) with reinduction with vincristine and prednisolon) for two years. CNS prophylaxis with MTX was delivered intrathecally 18 times. Standard risk patients with an HLA-identical sibling stem cell donor proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) after the first intensification, high risk patients received alloSCT from either sibling or unrelated donors. Adherence to the treatment schedule was urged by defining a strict timetable. Feasibility was defined by completion of chemotherapeutic and alloSCT protocol treatment within this a pre-defined timeframe. Thirty-five patients (65%) had B-cell phenotype ALL, 17 (31%) had T-cell phenotype and 2 (4%) had biphenotypic leukemia. Moreover, 23 patients (43%) had high risk disease, of whom 9 patients with BCR-ABL positive ALL. In total 33 patients fully completed treatment as scheduled, including 18 alloSCT recipients. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 91% (95% CI: 80–97). After a median follow-up of 26 months (range 15–36 months), 2-year event-free-survival (EFS) is 68% (95% CI: 53–78), 2-year disease free survival (DFS) 74% (95% CI: 59–84) and the 2-year overall survival (OS) 70% (95% CI: 55–81). Fifteen patients (28%) died, including 8 due to relapsed/refractory ALL, 3 due to infection, 3 due to toxicity and 1 due to graft versus host disease. CTC grade 4-5 toxicities (mainly liver/kidney function abnormalities and peripheral neuropathy) were observed in 15% during induction and 13% during consolidation. Severe infections (CTC grade 3-4) primarily occurred during induction (41%) and consolidation (39%). Failures were due to not reaching CR in 5 patients, early relapse in 2, severe extramedullary drug toxicity in 3, excessive delay in 7 and other reasons not otherwise specified (but most likely due to toxicity) in 4 patients. In conclusion, these data show that a dose-intensified chemotherapeutic regimen based on a pediatric schedule is safe and feasible in most adult ALL patients up to the age of 40, although a delay of subsequent cycles was frequently observed. Early efficacy data suggest a high CR rate and favourable DFS and OS. Based on this experience, a randomised phase III trial has recently been initiated. This trial was supported by the Dutch Cancer Foundation (CKTO 2005-08), EudraCT number 2005-000919-96 Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals A Novel Epigenetic Machine Learning Model to Define Risk of Progression for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 1075
Author(s):  
Luca Bedon ◽  
Michele Dal Bo ◽  
Monica Mossenta ◽  
Davide Busato ◽  
Giuseppe Toffoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Functional Enrichment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Of Progression ◽  
Risk Patients

Although extensive advancements have been made in treatment against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the prognosis of HCC patients remains unsatisfied. It is now clearly established that extensive epigenetic changes act as a driver in human tumors. This study exploits HCC epigenetic deregulation to define a novel prognostic model for monitoring the progression of HCC. We analyzed the genome-wide DNA methylation profile of 374 primary tumor specimens using the Illumina 450 K array data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. We initially used a novel combination of Machine Learning algorithms (Recursive Features Selection, Boruta) to capture early tumor progression features. The subsets of probes obtained were used to train and validate Random Forest models to predict a Progression Free Survival greater or less than 6 months. The model based on 34 epigenetic probes showed the best performance, scoring 0.80 accuracy and 0.51 Matthews Correlation Coefficient on testset. Then, we generated and validated a progression signature based on 4 methylation probes capable of stratifying HCC patients at high and low risk of progression. Survival analysis showed that high risk patients are characterized by a poorer progression free survival compared to low risk patients. Moreover, decision curve analysis confirmed the strength of this predictive tool over conventional clinical parameters. Functional enrichment analysis highlighted that high risk patients differentiated themselves by the upregulation of proliferative pathways. Ultimately, we propose the oncogenic MCM2 gene as a methylation-driven gene of which the representative epigenetic markers could serve both as predictive and prognostic markers. Briefly, our work provides several potential HCC progression epigenetic biomarkers as well as a new signature that may enhance patients surveillance and advances in personalized treatment.

scholarly journals Audio-guided self-hypnosis for reduction of claustrophobia during MR imaging: results of an observational 2-group study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriane E. Napp ◽  
Torsten Diekhoff ◽  
Olf Stoiber ◽  
Judith Enders ◽  
Gerd Diederichs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Mr Imaging ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Waiting Room ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Imaging Results ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
And Coping

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the influence of audio-guided self-hypnosis on claustrophobia in a high-risk cohort undergoing magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Methods In this prospective observational 2-group study, 55 patients (69% female, mean age 53.6 ± 13.9) used self-hypnosis directly before imaging. Claustrophobia included premature termination, sedation, and coping actions. The claustrophobia questionnaire (CLQ) was completed before self-hypnosis and after MR imaging. Results were compared to a control cohort of 89 patients examined on the same open MR scanner using logistic regression for multivariate analysis. Furthermore, patients were asked about their preferences for future imaging. Results There was significantly fewer claustrophobia in the self-hypnosis group (16%; 9/55), compared with the control group (43%; 38/89; odds ratio .14; p = .001). Self-hypnosis patients also needed less sedation (2% vs 16%; 1/55 vs 14/89; odds ratio .1; p = .008) and non-sedation coping actions (13% vs 28%; 7/55 vs 25/89; odds ratio .3; p = .02). Self-hypnosis did not influence the CLQ results measured before and after MR imaging (p = .79). Self-hypnosis reduced the frequency of claustrophobia in the subgroup of patients above an established CLQ cut-off of .33 from 47% (37/78) to 18% (9/49; p = .002). In the subgroup below the CLQ cut-off of 0.33, there were no significant differences (0% vs 9%, 0/6 vs 1/11; p = 1.0). Most patients (67%; 35/52) preferred self-hypnosis for future MR examinations. Conclusions Self-hypnosis reduced claustrophobia in high-risk patients undergoing imaging in an open MR scanner and might reduce the need for sedation and non-sedation coping actions. Key Points • Forty percent of the patients at high risk for claustrophobia may also experience a claustrophobic event in an open MR scanner. • Self-hypnosis while listening to an audio in the waiting room before the examination may reduce claustrophobic events in over 50% of patients with high risk for claustrophobia. • Self-hypnosis may also reduce the need for sedation and other time-consuming non-sedation coping actions and is preferred by high-risk patients for future examinations.

scholarly journals The role of idecabtagene vicleucel in patients with heavily pretreated refractory multiple myeloma

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204062072110196
Author(s):  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Laura Abril ◽  
Anna Torrent ◽  
Gladys Ibarra ◽  
Josep-Maria Ribera
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Development ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Acceptable Safety Profile ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

The development of several treatment options over the last 2 decades has led to a notable improvement in the survival of patients with multiple myeloma. Despite these advances, the disease remains incurable for most patients. Moreover, standard combinations of alkylating agents, immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies targeting CD38 and corticoids are exhausted relatively fast in a proportion of high-risk patients. Such high-risk patients account for over 20% of cases and currently represent a major unmet medical need. The challenge of drug resistance requires the development of highly active new agents with a radically different mechanism of action. Several immunotherapeutic modalities, including antibody–drug conjugates and T-cell engagers, appear to be promising choices for patients who develop resistance to standard combinations. Chimeric antigen-receptor-modified T cells (CAR-Ts) targeting B-cell maturation antigen have demonstrated encouraging efficacy and an acceptable safety profile compared with alternative options. Multiple CAR-Ts are in early stages of clinical development, but the first phase III trials with CAR-Ts are ongoing for two of them. After the recent publication of the results of a phase II trial confirming a notable efficacy and acceptable safety profile, idecabtagene vicleucel is the first CAR-T to gain regulatory US Food and Drug Administration approval to treat refractory multiple myeloma patients who have already been exposed to antibodies against CD38, proteasome inhibitors, and immunomodulatory agents and who are refractory to the last therapy. Here, we will discuss the preclinical and clinical development of idecabtagene vicleucel and its future role in the changing treatment landscape of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Is high-dose nafamostat mesilate effective for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis, especially in high-risk patients?

Pancreatology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. e42
Author(s):  
D.H. Kang ◽  
C.W. Choi ◽  
S.B. Park ◽  
H.W. Kim ◽  
J.H. Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Nafamostat Mesilate ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract 2471: Contemporary Results of Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients in the Context of Emerging Percutaneous Approaches

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Voisine ◽  
Siamak Mohammadi ◽  
Josep Rodés-Cabau ◽  
Patrick Mathieu ◽  
Jean Perron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Perioperative Mortality ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Related Mortality ◽  
Parsonnet Score

Percutaneous aortic valve replacement (AVR) is emerging as an alternative therapeutic approach for high-risk surgical patients, but criteria for patient selection are not clearly established. We sought to evaluate the perioperative and mid-term outcomes in a contemporary cohort of high-risk patients undergoing isolated AVR. Between 1997 and 2006, 855 consecutive patients underwent isolated AVR at our institution. High-risk patients (n=162, 19%) were defined by a preoperative Parsonnet score ≥ 30 or Euroscore ≥ 9. The remaining 693 patients (81%) composed the control group for comparison of perioperative mortality and mid-term freedom from all-cause and cardiac-related mortality. Mean follow up was 2.9±2.1 years. Perioperative mortality was 8.6% in the high-risk and 2.9% in the control group (p=0.0007), lower than that predicted by both scores (p<0.05). Freedom from all-cause mortality at 1 and 5 years were 94% and 82% for the control group and 87% and 65% for high-risk patients (p<0.0001). Freedom from cardiac-related mortality was also higher in the control (96% at 1 year, 91% at 5 years) than the high-risk (89% and 82%, p=0.0003) group. When considering patients who survived the 3-month perioperative period (537 in control, 114 in high-risk group), freedom from all-cause mortality was still higher in the former group at 1 and 5 years (99% vs 99% and 85% vs 75%, respectively, p=0.005), but freedom from cardiac-related mortality was not different (99% vs 100% and 94% vs 92%, respectively, p=0.3). By multivariate analysis, chronic renal failure, emergent procedures and reoperations were identified as independent predictors of mortality in high-risk patients. Contemporary perioperative mortality for isolated AVR in high-risk patients is lower than predicted by the Parsonnet score and Euroscore. Five-year survival in these patients is acceptable, and survivors of the operation experience the same cardiac-related survival benefit as those with standard perioperative risk. The perioperative survival benefit of percutaneous approaches for high-risk patients undergoing AVR remains to be demonstrated and, if present, should be weighed against mid-term outcome benefits of conventional surgical AVR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document