Assessment of objective response rate (ORR) by investigator versus blinded independent central review in pivotal trials of drugs approved for solid tumor indications.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13570-e13570
Author(s):  
Marjorie E. Zettler ◽  
Choo H. Lee ◽  
Ajeet Gajra ◽  
Bruce A. Feinberg
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
The Mean

e13570 Background: Objective response rate (ORR), defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response or partial response to treatment according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), is the most common endpoint used in pivotal trials supporting FDA approval of cancer drugs for solid tumor indications. Blinded independent central review (BICR) is frequently employed in clinical trials to minimize bias in evaluation of response rate, as historically, assessment of response by investigators (INV) has been shown to overestimate treatment effect. In this study, we analyzed the variability in assessment of ORR between INV and BICR in trials supporting recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of drugs for solid tumor indications. Methods: The FDA’s novel drug approvals (2015-2019) were reviewed to identify drugs receiving primary approval for solid tumor indications. Drug approval packages accessed via the Drugs@FDA database and primary publications for the pivotal trials accessed via PubMed were reviewed for investigator-assessed and BICR-assessed ORR. For trials reporting both assessments, the difference between INV and BICR ORR was determined across all study arms. Data are presented using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 36 drugs received primary approval for the treatment of solid tumors between 2015 and 2019. Of the 40 supporting trials, ORR was the primary endpoint for 21 (52.5%), progression-free survival for 13 (32.5%), and overall survival for 2 (5.0%). ORR was evaluated in 35 of the 40 trials (87.5%). Eight (22.9%) of the 35 trials evaluated INV ORR only, 5 (14.3%) evaluated BICR ORR only, and 22 (62.9%) evaluated both INV and BICR ORR. Among the 22 trials (29 arms in total), the mean difference between BICR- and INV-assessed ORR was -4.3% (95% CI: -6.4, -2.3); the range was -13.1 to 5. INV-assessed ORR was greater than BICR-assessed ORR in 22 of 29 arms (75.9%). The mean difference between BICR- and INV-assessed ORR among the 6 arms representing placebo or active control was -6.0 (95% CI: -11.0, -0.9), compared with -3.9 (95% CI: -6.3, -1.5) among the 23 experimental arms. Conclusions: Compared with BICR, INV overestimated ORR in three-quarters of the trial arms, including those representing control and experimental treatments. Despite this variability, for one fifth of the trials supporting approval of drugs to treat solid tumors, INV was the only method used to assess ORR. For consistency, and the ability to make relative cross-trial comparisons of ORR between agents, BICR should be considered for evaluation of tumor response in all registrational trials.

scholarly journals Pembrolizumab in Relapsed or Refractory Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (34) ◽  
pp. 3291-3299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Armand ◽  
Scott Rodig ◽  
Vladimir Melnichenko ◽  
Catherine Thieblemont ◽  
Kamal Bouabdallah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
End Points ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Duration Of Response

PURPOSE Patients with relapsed or refractory primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (rrPMBCL) have a poor prognosis, and their treatment represents an urgent and unmet need. Because PMBCL is associated with genetic aberrations at 9p24 and overexpression of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) ligands (PD-L1), it is hypothesized to be susceptible to PD-1 blockade. METHODS In the phase IB KEYNOTE-013 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01953692 ) and phase II KEYNOTE-170 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02576990 ) studies, adults with rrPMBCL received pembrolizumab for up to 2 years or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end points were safety and objective response rate in KEYNOTE-013 and objective response rate in KEYNOTE-170. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory end points included association between biomarkers and pembrolizumab activity. RESULTS The objective response rate was 48% (7 complete responses; 33%) among 21 patients in KEYNOTE-013 and 45% (7 complete responses; 13%) among 53 patients in KEYNOTE-170. After a median follow-up time of 29.1 months in KEYNOTE-013 and 12.5 months in KEYNOTE-170, the median duration of response was not reached in either study. No patient with complete response experienced progression, including 2 patients with complete response for at least 1 year off therapy. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 24% of patients in KEYNOTE-013 and 23% of patients in KEYNOTE-170. There were no treatment-related deaths. Among 42 evaluable patients, the magnitude of the 9p24 gene abnormality was associated with PD-L1 expression, which was itself significantly associated with progression-free survival. CONCLUSION Pembrolizumab is associated with high response rate, durable activity, and a manageable safety profile in patients with rrPMBCL.

Phase II study of sorafenib combined with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Preliminary results

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16093-e16093
Author(s):  
L. Hongyun ◽  
C. Zhihong ◽  
Y. Xiangqing ◽  
S. Lu ◽  
C. Chuanliang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Eligibility Criteria

e16093 Background: The tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib and sunitinib have been approved for use in patients with advanced RCC and have supplanted immunotherapy as first-line therapy. Nevertheless, complete responses have been observed only rarely with these agents and only 10% of patients experience PR. The vast majority of responding patients will ultimately progress despite continued therapy. In order to improve the objective response rate and the durability of those responses in patients, we conducted a single-institution, single-arm phase II trial of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with sorafenib in patients with RCC. Methods: Eligibility criteria included advanced, histologically confirmed RCC; age >18 years; ECOG PS ≤ 2, adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function; measurable/evaluable lesions. Gemcitabine was administered at 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 min i.v. on days 1 and 8, followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2 i.v. bolus on day 1 and 1,200 mg/m2/day × 2 days continuous infusion (28-day cycle). From day 1 of cycle 1, 400 mg sorafenib was continuously given twice daily. The sample size of 21 patients was sufficient to provide 80% power to detect an objective response rate that was greater than 10% with significance that 0.05 level. Results were expressed as mean±SD or median ± 95% CI. The primary study endpoint was objective response rate and the secondary were toxicity, progression-free survival and overall survival. Results: Patients (n = 21) were enrolled from May 2006 to Dec. 2007. The rate of objective response and disease control (including stable disease, complete responses and partial responses) were 38% (95% CI, 18–62%) and 86% (95% CI, 64–97%), respectively. Among them, there is 1 complete response and 2 pts occurred completely liquefaction deliquesce in metastatic lesions. The median PFS time is longer than 13 months, with 6/21 patients remaining progression free at 2008.12.26 the data were compiled for this report (three are longer than 26 months and there other three longer than 13 months ). The median OS time have not yet been reached, because of the amount of censoring data. Conclusions: The combination of sorafenib with gemcitabine and 5-FU shows promising activity for patients with metastatic RCC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Salvage therapy for multiple myeloma with thalidomide and CED chemotherapy

Blood ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 98 (13) ◽  
pp. 3846-3848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Moehler ◽  
Kai Neben ◽  
Axel Benner ◽  
Gerlinde Egerer ◽  
Fatime Krasniqi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
World Health ◽  
Remission Induction

Abstract The feasibility and efficacy of a combination of thalidomide, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and dexamethasone were studied in 56 patients with poor-prognosis multiple myeloma. Of 50 patients evaluable for response, 4% achieved complete response (CR), 64% partial response (PR), 18% minimal response (MR), 6% stable disease (SD), and 8% progressive disease (PD), resulting in an objective response rate (≥ MR) of 86.0% (76.7% overall objective response rate in intent-to-treat analysis; n = 56). Subsequent to successful remission induction, 18 patients received autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The median progression-free survival in all patients was 16 months. The median overall survival time could not be calculated, since the last observed death occurred after 16 months of follow-up (median follow-up of 14 months) with a corresponding estimated survival probability of 55%. Severe adverse effects (World Health Organization III/IV) included infectious complications (35.7%) and cardiovascular events (7.1%). The data suggest that Thal improves antitumor activity of salvage chemotherapy regimens in poor-prognosis multiple myeloma.

Effects of adding necitumumab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1331-1342
Author(s):  
Irena Ilic ◽  
Sandra Sipetic ◽  
Jovan Grujicic ◽  
Milena Ilic
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

Introduction Almost half of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Our aim was to assess the effects of adding necitumumab to chemotherapy in patients with stage IV NSCLC. Material and methods A comprehensive literature search was performed according to pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data on overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate and adverse events were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for time-to-event data and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes. Results The meta-analysis included four randomized clinical trials with 2074 patients. The pooled results showed significant improvement for overall survival (HR = 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.95), p = 0.004) when necitumumab was added to chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. No statistically significant improvement was noted for progression-free survival and objective response rate (HR = 0.83 (95% CI 0.69–1.01), p = 0.06 and OR = 1.46 (95% CI 0.90–2.38), p = 0.13, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that in patients with non-squamous NSCLC, there was no benefit in overall survival and objective response rate. Patients with advanced NSCLC who received necitumumab were at the highest odds of developing a skin rash (OR = 14.50 (95% CI 3.16–66.43), p = 0.0006) and hypomagnesaemia (OR = 2.77 (95% CI 2.23–3.45), p < 0.00001), while the OR for any grade ≥3 adverse event was 1.55 (95% CI 1.28–1.87, p < 0.00001). Conclusions The addition of necitumumab to standard chemotherapy in a first-line setting in patients with stage IV NSCLC results in a statistically significant improvement in overall survival, while the results were not significant for progression-free survival and objective response rate.

scholarly journals Phase Ib/II Study of Pembrolizumab and Pegylated-Interferon Alfa-2b in Advanced Melanoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (35) ◽  
pp. 3450-3458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diwakar Davar ◽  
Hong Wang ◽  
Joe-Marc Chauvin ◽  
Ornella Pagliano ◽  
Julien J. Fourcade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pegylated Interferon ◽  
Gene Signature ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Phase Ib

Purpose Objective responses are reported in 34% to 37% of patients with programmed death-1 (PD-1)–naïve advanced melanoma treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Pre-existing CD8+ T-cell infiltrate and interferon (IFN) gene signature correlate with response to PD-1 blockade. Here, we report a phase Ib/II study of pembrolizumab/pegylated (PEG)-IFN combination in PD-1–naïve advanced melanoma. Patients and Methods PEG-IFN (1, 2, and 3 μg/kg per week) was dose escalated using a modified toxicity probability interval design in three cohorts of four patients each, whereas pembrolizumab was dosed at 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks in the phase Ib portion. Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the phase II portion. Primary objectives were safety and incidence of dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary objectives included objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. Results Forty-three patients with stage IV melanoma were enrolled in the phase Ib and II portions of the study and included in the analysis. At the data cutoff date (December 31, 2017), median follow-up duration was 25 months (range, 1 to 38 months). All 43 patients experienced at least one adverse event; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 21 of 43 patients (48.8%). Objective responses were seen at all three dose levels among 43 evaluable patients. The objective response rate was 60.5%, with 46.5% of patients exhibiting ongoing response. Median PFS was 11.0 months in all patients and unreached in responders, whereas median overall survival remained unreached in all patients. The 2-year PFS rate was 46%. Conclusion Pembrolizumab/PEG-IFN demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile with promising evidence of clinical efficacy in PD-1–naïve metastatic melanoma. These results support the rationale to further investigate this pembrolizumab/PEG-IFN combination in this disease.

Venetoclax for Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia With 17p Deletion: Results From the Full Population of a Phase II Pivotal Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (19) ◽  
pp. 1973-1980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Stilgenbauer ◽  
Barbara Eichhorst ◽  
Johannes Schetelig ◽  
Peter Hillmen ◽  
John F. Seymour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose Venetoclax is an orally bioavailable B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor. US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval for patients with 17p deleted relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia [del(17p) CLL] was based on results from 107 patients. An additional 51 patients were enrolled in a safety expansion cohort. Extended analysis of all enrolled patients, including the effect of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity on outcome, is now reported. Patients and Methods Overall, 158 patients with relapsed/refractory or previously untreated (n = 5) del(17p) CLL received venetoclax 400 mg per day after an initial dose ramp up. Responses were based on 2008 International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia criteria, with monthly physical exams and blood counts. Computed tomography scan was mandatory at week 36, after which assessment made was by clinical evaluation. Marrow biopsy was performed when complete remission was suspected. MRD was assessed by flow cytometry. Results Patients had a median of two prior therapies (range, zero to 10 therapies), 71% had TP53 mutation, and 48% had nodes that were ≥ 5 cm. Median time on venetoclax was 23.1 months (range, 0 to 44.2 months) and median time on study was 26.6 months (range, 0 to 44.2 months). For all patients, investigator-assessed objective response rate was 77% (122 of 158 patients; 20% complete remission) and estimated progression-free survival at 24 months was 54% (95% CI, 45% to 62%). For 16 patients who received prior kinase inhibitors, objective response rate was 63% (10 of 16 patients) and 24-month progression-free survival estimate was 50% (95% CI, 25% to 71%). By intent-to-treat analysis, 48 (30%) of 158 patients achieved MRD below the cutoff of 10−4 in blood. Common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were hematologic and managed with supportive care and/or dose adjustments. Conclusion Venetoclax achieves durable responses and was well tolerated in patients with del(17p) CLL. A high rate of blood MRD < 10−4 was achieved in this high-risk population.

HALO 202: Randomized Phase II Study of PEGPH20 Plus Nab-Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine Versus Nab-Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine in Patients With Untreated, Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil R. Hingorani ◽  
Lei Zheng ◽  
Andrea J. Bullock ◽  
Tara E. Seery ◽  
William P. Harris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Event Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
End Points ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is characterized by excessive hyaluronan (HA) accumulation in the tumor microenvironment, elevating interstitial pressure and impairing perfusion. Preclinical studies demonstrated pegvorhyaluronidase alfa (PEGPH20) degrades HA, thereby increasing drug delivery. Patients and Methods Patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to treatment with PEGPH20 plus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (PAG) or nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (AG). Tumor HA levels were measured retrospectively using a novel affinity histochemistry assay. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS; overall) and thromboembolic (TE) event rate. Secondary end points included overall survival, PFS by HA level, and objective response rate. An early imbalance in TE events in the PAG arm led to a clinical hold; thereafter, patients with TE events were excluded and enoxaparin prophylaxis was initiated. Results A total of 279 patients were randomly assigned; 246 had HA data; 231 were evaluable for efficacy; 84 (34%) had HA-high tumors (ie, extracellular matrix HA staining ≥ 50% of tumor surface at any intensity). PFS was significantly improved with PAG treatment overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.00; P = .049) and for patients with HA-high tumors (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.00; P = .048). In patients with HA-high tumors (PAG v AG), the objective response rate was 45% versus 31%, and median overall survival was 11.5 versus 8.5 months (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.61). The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events with significant differences between arms (PAG v AG) included muscle spasms (13% v 1%), neutropenia (29% v 18%), and myalgia (5% v 0%). TE events were comparable after enoxaparin initiation (14% PAG v 10% AG). Conclusion This study met its primary end points of PFS and TE event rate. The largest improvement in PFS was observed in patients with HA-high tumors who received PAG. A similar TE event rate was observed between the treatment groups in stage 2 of the trial.

Clinical effectiveness of bevacizumab in patients with recurrent brain tumours: A population-based evaluation

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mário L de Lemos ◽  
Adeline Markarian ◽  
Esther Chan ◽  
Kimberly Schaff ◽  
Susan Walisser
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Brain Tumour ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Brain Tumour

Background Bevacizumab is an antiangiogenic agent active in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas. However, evidence for its clinical efficacy is relatively limited so that bevacizumab is approved for this indication in Canada and the United States, but not in the European Union. We reviewed the effectiveness of bevacizumab in patients with recurrent brain tumour using a large population database. Methods This was a retrospective, multicentre, study conducted at the BC Cancer Agency, a public cancer care organisation for the residents of the Canadian province of British Columbia. Cases were identified from the provincial registry and drug database. Patients were eligible if they were treated with bevacizumab with or without lomustine or etoposide for recurrent brain tumour between April 2011 and March 2014. The primary end points were progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and objective response rate. Results A total of 160 patients were included, with a median age of 55 years. The most common diagnosis was glioblastoma multiforme (70.6%), followed by oligodendroglioma (10.6%). Half of the patients had prior metronomic dosing of temozolomide. The median duration of therapy was 3 months. The median progression-free survival was 4.0 months and the 6-month progression-free survival was 29.4%. The median overall survival was 7 months and the 9-month and 12-month overall survival was 28.1% and 20.6%, respectively. The objective response rate was 23.1%. The most common documented reason for bevacizumab discontinuation was disease progression (66.9%), followed by toxicity (6.9%). Conclusions Bevacizumab therapy seems to be effective in delaying disease progression in patients with recurrent brain tumour, but with limited benefits on the overall survival, when used outside the clinical trial setting.

Phase II Results of Bendamustine in Combination with Rituximab in Relapsed Indolent and Mantle-Cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2710-2710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard H. Van der Jagt ◽  
Philip Cohen ◽  
Bruce D. Cheson ◽  
Anil Tulpule ◽  
Jordan A. Herst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Prior Chemotherapy ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bendamustine HCl (TREANDA®) in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Background: Bendamustine is a novel hybrid, alkylating agent with single-agent activity in multiple hematologic and solid tumors. It induces cell death via both apoptosis and the apoptosis-independent pathway of mitotic catastrophe. The combination of bendamustine and rituximab has been shown to exhibit a synergistic antitumor effect on NHL cells. Methods: This Phase II, multicenter study enrolled adult patients with relapsed, indolent B-cell or mantle-cell NHL who were not refractory to rituximab (defined as progression ≤6 months of last rituximab dose). Patients received rituximab 375 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 and bendamustine 90 mg/m2 IV on days 2 and 3 of a 28-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles. An additional dose of rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV was given 1 week before the first cycle of bendamustine and 4 weeks after the last cycle. Results: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included 66 patients (59% men) with a median age of 60 years (range, 40–84). Indolent histologic phenotype was seen in 54 patients with the following histologic subtypes: follicular center cell (61%), small lymphocytic (15%), lymphoplasmacytic (3%), and marginal zone (3%); 18% had mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL). A total of 85% of patients had stage III/IV disease. These patients relapsed from a median of 1 prior chemotherapy (range: 0–5), with 56% having had prior treatment with rituximab. Patients with no prior chemotherapy relapsed following biologic therapy. In the ITT population, the overall objective response rate (ORR) was 94% (complete response [CR]/complete response unconfirmed [CRu], 41%; partial response [PR], 53%); 6% had stable disease. The ORR for the 12 MCL patients was 92% (CR/CRu, 42%; PR 50%). For all patients, the median duration of response and progression-free survival has not been reached after a median follow-up of 8.3 months (range, 0.14–31 months). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 41% of patients (7%, febrile neutropenia). Common nonhematologic toxicities (grade 1/2, grade 3, grade 4) were nausea (68%, 0%, 0%) and fatigue (53%, 5%, 0%); one patient had grade 3 sepsis. No alopecia was observed. Conclusions: Bendamustine administered in combination with rituximab produced a high objective response rate and was generally well tolerated in patients with relapsed indolent and mantle-cell NHL who were not refractory to rituximab. These results suggest that the combination of bendamustine and rituximab may be comparable in activity to R-CHOP, and further studies of this combination are warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document