Descriptive cross-sectional analysis of lung cancer screening in inner city resident run clinic.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18668-e18668
Author(s):  
Meghana Singh ◽  
Radhika Kulkarni ◽  
Nerea Lopetegui-Lia ◽  
James J. Vredenburgh
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Preventative Care ◽  
Cross Sectional

e18668 Background: Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. The 5-year survival rate is 19% but goes up to 57% if diagnosed at early stage. The recommendation for lung cancer screening is low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for adults of age 55 to 80 years who have a 30 pack-year smoking history and are currently smoking or have quit in the past 15 years. Unfortunately, less than 5% of eligible patients undergo LDCT. Methods: A retrospective chart review was done for patients with any smoking history, who had internal medicine residents as their primary care provider. The data collected included baseline characteristics and the rates of LDCT scan being ordered and completed. Results: 706 medical charts were reviewed. 178 patients (25.2%) qualified for LDCT screening. The average age of patients included was 64.41 years and average BMI was 28.8 kg/m2. 48.3% were female and 51.6% were male. 54% were current smokers and 46% were former smokers. The ethnic/racial distribution was as follows: 19% African American, 36.5% Hispanic,16.2% Caucasian and 27.5% belonging to other groups. The primary insurance was as follows: 48.8% Medicaid, 19.6% Medicare, 25.8% private insurance and 5% were uninsured. 95 patients (53.3%) had a LDCT scan ordered and 73/95 (76.8%) completed the LDCT scan. The rate of compliance among patients based on their race/ethnicity and primary insurance is detailed in the table. Only 30% of the patients initially screened had a follow up LDCT ordered in one year. Conclusions: Low screening rate LDCT may be due to new residents not prioritizing preventative care. Patients at this clinic belong to a lower socioeconomic class with limited resources. There may be barriers to completion of the ordered test, like poor health literacy, scheduling issues, transportation, fear of being diagnosed with cancer and poor understanding of preventative health. Residents need to be educated about the importance of lung cancer screening as early detection translates into better outcomes and lower mortality. Patients need to be informed of the benefit of screening to improve compliance rate. Assessing the barriers these patients face to completing the screening test should also be carefully evaluated to better identify areas of improvement.[Table: see text]

LOW-DOSE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN MOSCOW FOR LUNG CANCER SCREENING (LDCT-MLCS): BASELINE RESULTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-233
Author(s):  
Sergey Morozov ◽  
Viktor Gombolevskiy ◽  
Anton Vladzimirskiy ◽  
Albina Laypan ◽  
Pavel Kononets ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Malignant Neoplasms ◽  
Number Needed To Screen ◽  
Low Dose Computed Tomography

Study aim. To justify selective lung cancer screening via low-dose computed tomography and evaluate its effectiveness. Materials and methods. In 2017 we have concluded the baseline stage of “Lowdose computed tomography in Moscow for lung cancer screening (LDCT-MLCS)” trial. The trial included 10 outpatient clinics with 64-detector CT units (Toshiba Aquilion 64 and Toshiba CLX). Special low-dose protocols have been developed for each unit with maximum effective dose of 1 mSv (in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 2.2.1, Sanitary Regulations 2.6.1.1192-03). The study involved 5,310 patients (53% men, 47% women) aged 18-92 years (mean age 62 years). Diagnosis verification was carried out in the specialized medical organizations via consultations, additional instrumental, laboratory as well as pathohistological studies. The results were then entered into the “National Cancer Registry”. Results. 5310 patients (53% men, 47% women) aged 18 to 92 years (an average of 62 years) participated in the LDCT-MLCS. The final cohort was comprised of 4762 (89.6%) patients. We have detected 291 (6.1%) Lung-RADS 3 lesions, 228 (4.8%) Lung- RADS 4A lesions and 196 (4.1%) Lung-RADS 4B/4X lesions. All 4B and 4X lesions were routed in accordance with the project's methodology and legislative documents. Malignant neoplasms were verified in 84 cases (1.76% of the cohort). Stage I-II lung cancer was actively detected in 40.3% of these individuals. For the first time in the Russian Federation we have calculated the number needed to screen (NNS) to identify one lung cancer (NNS=57) and to detect one Stage I lung cancer (NNS=207). Conclusions. Based on the global experience and our own practices, we argue that selective LDCT is the most systematic solution to the problem of early-stage lung cancer screening.

scholarly journals Determining the perception of a lung cancer screening programme among high-risk patients in a tertiary referral centre, Kuala Lumpur

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
Wei Hao Kok ◽  
Andrea Ban Yu-Lin ◽  
Shamsul Azhar Shah ◽  
Faisal Abdul Hamid
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Screening Programme ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Willingness To Participate ◽  
Tertiary Referral Centre ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cancer Screening Programme

Background: Lung cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death and the third most common cancer in Malaysia. The rising prevalence of lung cancer suggests the need to consider disease screening for early detection, especially in the high-risk population, as it offers the best chance of cure. Objectives: The study aims to determine the willingness of high-risk respondents to participate in a lung cancer screening programme if made available to them, and to determine their attitude towards lung cancer screening and explore factors that might affect participation in a screening programme. Method: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study over 6 months conducted in adult patients attending medical clinics in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC) using face-to-face administered questionnaires. Results: In total 180 respondents were analysed. There were 177 (98.3%) males. Mean age was 59.8 ± 9.1 years. Of the respondents, 138 (76.7%) had poor knowledge about cancer screening. Former smokers comprised 119 (66.1%) of the participants, and 61 (33.9%) were current smokers. In total, 141 (78.3%) respondents indicated willingness to participate in a lung cancer screening programme. Out of this group, 68 (48.2%) respondents were unwilling to pay for the procedure. Only 18 (12.8%) were unwilling to undergo lung cancer treatment if detected early. Conclusions: Awareness about general cancer screening is low. Our study showed that when informed of their high-risk status, respondents were willing to participate in lung cancer screening. There should be more health programmes to promote and raise awareness about lung cancer.

scholarly journals Implementation of Shared Decision Making for Lung Cancer Screening Among the Privately Insured Nonelderly

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 238146832098477
Author(s):  
Ya-Chen Tina Shih ◽  
Ying Xu ◽  
Lisa M. Lowenstein ◽  
Robert J. Volk
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Coverage Policy ◽  
Privately Insured

Introduction. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services requires a written order of shared decision making (SDM) visit in its coverage policy for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening (LCS). With screening eligibility starting at age 55, private insurance plans will likely adopt this coverage policy. This study examined the implementation of SDM in the context of LCS among the privately insured. Methods. We constructed two study cohorts from MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database 2016-2017: a LDCT cohort who received LDCT for LCS and an SDM cohort who had an LCS-related SDM visit. For the LDCT cohort, we examined the trend and factors associated with the receipt of SDM within 3 months prior to LDCT. For the SDM cohort, we studied the trend and factors associated with LDCT within 3 months after an SDM visit. Results. For privately insured adults aged <64, 93% (19,681/21,084) of the LDCT cohort did not have a billing claim indicating SDM, although the uptake of SDM increased from 3.1% in 1Q2016 to 8.2% in 4Q2017 ( P < 0.0001). For the SDM cohort, 46% (948/2048) did not have a claim for an LDCT for lung cancer screening in the 3 months after the SDM visit; this percentage increased from 29.5% in 1Q2016 to 61.8% in 3Q2017 ( P < 0.0001). Limitations. Findings cannot be generalized to other nonelderly adults without private insurance. Additionally, the rate of SDM identified from claims may be underreported. Conclusions. We found a growing but low uptake of SDM among privately insured individuals who underwent LDCT. The higher rate of LDCT in the SDM cohort than the rate reported in national studies emphasized the importance of patient awareness.

Implementation of a Lung Cancer Screening Program in Two Federally Qualified Health Centers

2021 ◽  
pp. 003335492097171
Author(s):  
Lesley Watson ◽  
Megan M. Cotter ◽  
Shauna Shafer ◽  
Kara Neloms ◽  
Robert A. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Federally Qualified Health Centers ◽  
Cancer Society ◽  
Improved Outcomes

Using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) to screen for lung cancer is associated with improved outcomes among eligible current and former smokers (ie, aged 55-77, at least 30-pack–year smoking history, current smoker or former smoker who quit within the past 15 years). However, the overall uptake of LDCT is low, especially in health care settings with limited personnel and financial resources. To increase access to lung cancer screening services, the American Cancer Society partnered with 2 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Tennessee and West Virginia to conduct a pilot project focused on developing and refining the LDCT screening referral processes and practices. Each FQHC was required to partner with an American College of Radiology–designated lung cancer screening center in its area to ensure high-quality patient care. The pilot project was conducted in 2 phases: 6 months of capacity building (January–June 2016) followed by 2 years of implementation (July 2016–June 2018). One site created a sustainable LDCT referral program, and the other site encountered numerous barriers and failed to overcome them. This case study highlights implementation barriers and factors associated with success and improved outcomes in LDCT screening.

scholarly journals Perspectives of family physicians towards access to lung cancer screening for individuals living with low income – a qualitative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ambreen Sayani ◽  
Mandana Vahabi ◽  
Mary Ann O’Brien ◽  
Geoffrey Liu ◽  
Stephen W. Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Lung Cancer Risk ◽  
Family Physicians ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
Preventative Care ◽  
Systems Model

Abstract Background Individuals living with low income are less likely to participate in lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography. Family physicians (FPs) are typically responsible for referring eligible patients to LCS; therefore, we sought to understand their perspectives on access to lung cancer screening for individuals living with low income in order to improve equity in access to LCS. Methods A theory-informed thematic analysis was conducted using data collected from 11 semi-structured interviews with FPs recruited from three primary care sites in downtown Toronto. Data was coded using the Systems Model of Clinical Preventative Care as a framework and interpretation was guided by the synergies of oppression analytical lens. Results Four overarching themes describe FP perspectives on access to LCS for individuals living with low income: the degree of social disadvantage that influences lung cancer risk and opportunities to access care; the clinical encounter, where there is often a mismatch between the complex health needs of low income individuals and structure of health care appointments; the need for equity-oriented health care, illustrated by the neglect of structural origins of health risk and the benefits of a trauma-informed approach; and finally, the multiprong strategies that will be needed in order to improve equity in health outcomes. Conclusion An equity-oriented and interdisciplinary team based approach to care will be needed in order to improve access to LCS, and attention must be given to the upstream determinants of lung cancer in order to reduce lung cancer risk.

scholarly journals Surgically treated lung cancer patients: do they all smoke and would they all have been detected with lung cancer screening?

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 00001-2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanel Laisaar ◽  
Bruno Sarana ◽  
Indrek Benno ◽  
Kaja-Triin Laisaar
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Screening Trial ◽  
Lung Cancer Detection

Since publication of the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NLST) results early lung cancer detection has been widely studied, targeting individuals based on smoking history and age. However, over recent decades several changes in lung cancer epidemiology, including risk factors, have taken place. The aim of the current study was to explore smoking prevalence among lung cancer patients who had been treated surgically or undergone a diagnostic operation and whether these patients would have met the NLST inclusion criteria.All patients operated on for lung cancer in a university hospital in Estonia between 2009 and 2015 were included. Data were collected from hospital records.426 patients were operated on for lung cancer, with smoking history properly documented in 327 patients (87 females; median age 67 years). 170 (52%) patients were smokers, 97 (30%) patients were ex-smokers and 60 (18%) patients were nonsmokers. The proportion of females among smokers was 15%, among ex-smokers was 9% and among nonsmokers was 87%. 107 of our patients would not have met the NLST age criteria and 128 of our patients would not have met the NLST smoking criteria. In total, 183 patients (56% (79% of females and 48% of males)) would not have met the NLST inclusion criteria.Only half of surgically treated lung cancer patients were current smokers and more than half did not meet the NLST inclusion criteria.

scholarly journals Ten years of experience in lung cancer screening in Gdańsk, Poland: a comparative study of the evaluation and surgical treatment of 14 200 participants of 2 lung cancer screening programmes

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 266-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Ostrowski ◽  
Tomasz Marjański ◽  
Robert Dziedzic ◽  
Małgorzata Jelitto-Górska ◽  
Katarzyna Dziadziuszko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Screening Programme ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Diagnostic Work ◽  
Low Dose Computed Tomography ◽  
Tomography Scan

Abstract OBJECTIVES The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons’ recommendations confirm the implementation of lung cancer screening in Europe. We compared 2 screening programmes, the Pilot Pomeranian Lung Cancer Screening Programme (pilot study) and the Moltest Bis programme, completed in a single centre. METHODS A total of 8649 healthy volunteers (aged 50–75 years, smoking history ≥20 pack-years) were enrolled in a pilot study between 2009 and 2011, and a total of 5534 healthy volunteers (aged 50–79, smoking history ≥30 pack-years) were enrolled in the Moltest Bis programme between 2016 and 2017. Each participant had a low-dose computed tomography scan of the chest. Participants with a nodule diameter of >10 mm or with suspected tumour morphology underwent a diagnostic work-up in the pilot study. In the Moltest Bis programme, the criteria were based on the volume of the detected nodule on the baseline low-dose computed tomography scan and the volume doubling time in the subsequent rounds. RESULTS Lung cancer was diagnosed in 107 (1.24%) and 105 (1.90%) participants of the pilot study and of the Moltest Bis programme, respectively (P = 0.002). A total of 300 (3.5%) and 199 (3.6%) patients, respectively, were referred for further invasive diagnostic work-ups (P = 0.69). A total of 125 (1.5%) and 80 (1.5%) patients, respectively, underwent surgical resection (P = 0.74). The number of resected benign lesions was similar: 44 (35.0%) and 20 (25.0%), respectively (P = 0.13), but with a downwards trend. Lobectomies and/or segmentectomies were performed in 84.0% and 90.0% of patients with lung cancer, respectively (P = 0.22). Notably, patients in the Moltest Bis programme underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery more often than did those in the pilot study (72.5% vs 24.0%, P < 0.001). Surgical patients with stages I and II non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounted for 83.4% of the Moltest patients and 86.4% of the pilot study patients (P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS Modified inclusion criteria in the screening programme lead to a higher detection rate of NSCLC. Growing expertise in lung cancer screening leads to increased indications for minimally invasive surgery and an increased proportion of lung-sparing resections. A single-team experience in lung cancer screening does not lead to a major reduction in the rate of diagnostic procedures and operations for non-malignant lesions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document