Outcomes and safety analysis of a phase IB trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to all sites of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer combined with durvalumab and tremelimumab.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21212-e21212
Author(s):  
Michael Frederick Bassetti ◽  
Nan Sethakorn ◽  
Joshua Michael Lang ◽  
Jennifer L. Schehr ◽  
Zachery Schultz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Metastatic Sites

e21212 Background: Combining local ablative and systemic therapies in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC leads to improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The potential immunostimulatory effects of ablating all visible disease with SBRT in combination with dual immune checkpoint inhibition has prompted interest, but the toxicity and benefit are unknown. Methods: We conducted a phase Ib study to investigate the safety of SBRT, with doses between 30 and 50 Gy in five fractions to all sites of disease, followed by durvalumab 1500 mg IV in combination with tremelimumab 75 mg IV every 4 weeks x 4 cycles, followed by durvalumab maintenance until progression. Eligible patients had 1-6 extracranial metastatic sites, allowing multiple metastases per location, with all lesions suitable for SBRT, ECOG performance status 0-1, no actionable driver mutation, and no prior immunotherapy. The primary endpoint was safety of this combination. Secondary endpoints include PFS and OS. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (any Grade ≥ 3 toxicity) were evaluated from the first administration of SBRT until 28 days post start of durvalumab and tremelimumab. Baseline tumor mutational burden, PD-L1 expression on post-SBRT biopsy and circulating tumor cells will be correlated with outcomes. In this first cohort analysis, we assess the safety and outcomes of the first 17 patients. Results: From 2/2018-2/2021, the first 17 pts were enrolled. Characteristics of those enrolled included: median age 68 years, female/male 4/13, squamous/non-squamous 2/15, median number of non-central nervous system (CNS) metastatic sites 2 (1-5), median number of non-CNS metastatic lesions 2 (1-9), CNS involvement 6/17 (35.3%), previous treatment 4/17 (23.5%). DLTs were seen in 2/17 (11.8%) patients; DLTs were autoimmune hepatitis and autoimmune pancreatitis. Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade (G) 1/2. TRAEs included: all TRAEs n = 188, 88.2% (of patients); G 3 n = 17, 29.4%; G 4 n = 1, 5.8%. There were no treatment-related deaths. Five patients discontinued treatment due to grade 3/4 immune related adverse events (IRAE). At a median follow up of 20 months 11/17 (64.7%) patients are alive with 10/17 (58.8%) with no evidence of disease (NED). Six of 17 (35.2%) patients experienced disease progression and 4/17 (23.5%) patients died of disease progression. Median PFS and OS are not yet reached. Conclusions: There were no unexpected safety signals in the cohort of patients enrolled. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 IRAEs is similar to the treatment of advanced NSCLC and no additional toxicity was observed with the addition of SBRT. Clinical outcomes look promising with median OS and PFS not yet reached at 20 months median follow up. The study continues to enroll a second cohort and results will be updated. Clinical trial information: NCT03275597.

Preliminary results for the combination of docetaxel, oxaliplatin and capecitabine as a first-line treatment for metastatic oesophagogastric cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14076-14076
Author(s):  
S. Viteri ◽  
J. Rodríguez ◽  
M. González Cao ◽  
J. De La Cámara ◽  
A. Chopitea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Median Number ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Metastatic Sites ◽  
Ecog Ps

14076 Background: Chemotherapy remains the main treatment option for metastatic oesopagogastric cancer (MOC) patients (Pts). First-line regimens have proved a slight but significant increase in quality of life and survival, but a standard regimen has not been defined yet. Several new drugs, as Docetaxel (D), Oxaliplatin (O) and Capecitabine (C) have demostrated activity in MOC. They have shown synergy in preclinical models and activity in previous phase II trials. The purpose of our study is to asses activity and feasibility of the combination of D, O and C as first-line chemotherapy in MOC patients. Methods: MOC patients, with good ECOG performance status and chemonaive are eligible. Pts receive D 60 mg/m2 day 1, O 85 mg/m2 day 1 and oral C 650mg/m2 bid d1–14 every 3 weeks. Primary endpoints are response according to WHO criteria and toxiciy assesment according to NCI.CTCAE v3.0. Results: From November 2004 to December 2005, 17 Pts have been enrolled. Median ECOG PS is 1 (0–2) M/F:9/8. Median age is 57 years (38–68) Primary tumor are gastric carcinomas (82%) and lower oesofagus carcinomas (18%). Metastatic sites included peritoneum 58%, liver 23% and lung 23%. Median number of cycles is 5 (1–7) Treatment is well tolerated with no toxic deaths. NCI grade 3–4 toxicities include 2 Pts (11.8%) with grade 4 neutropenia and one of them developed septic shock; 2 Pts with grade 3 asthenia, 1 Pt with grade 3 vomiting and 1 patient with grade 3 neurotoxicity. Main NCI grade 2 toxicities are dhiarrea (35.3%) and neurotoxicity (23.5%). 13 Pts have been evaluated for response until now: 9 Pts have a confirmed Partial Response (69.2%) and 2 of them underwent salvage surgery; 3 Pts have Stabilized Disease and 1 Pt Progression Disease. Median time to progression and median overall survival have not been reached yet and the study is still ongoing. Conclusions: The combination of D, O and C at the dosses and schedule used in this trial is effective in MOC with a manageable toxicity profile No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Decitabine in Low- or Intermediate 1-Risk MDS

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4377-4377
Author(s):  
Zhijian Cao ◽  
Jun Ma
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Neutropenic Fever ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract OBJECTIVES: Decitabine has been approved in China for treatment with high-risk Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients (pts) in 2008. However data of decitabine on efficacy and safety of low-dose decitabine in low- or intermediate 1-risk MDS was absence. Herein,3 years datas in our centre of low- or intermediate 1-risk MDS treated with decitabine were analysed to evaluate the efficacy and safety in two subgroups. METHODS: Inclusion Criteria:Patients of age > 18; Patients with low-or intermediate 1-risk MDS. The IPSS is used to classify patients with MDS across disease subgroups. ECOG performance status ≤ 2. And normal hepatic,renal and cardiac function. Study Design: Decitabine 20mg/m2 intravenously (IV) over the course of one hour daily for 3 days. Courses were repeated every 28 days when possible. Dose reductions for grade 3 and 4 toxicities were allowed for decitabine (to 10 mg/m2 or 15 mg/m2). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: In total, 37 patients were enrolled and treated from September 2014 to October 2017 in our center. The median follow-up was 26 months (range, 4-49 months). The median time from diagnosis to therapy with decitabine was 3 weeks (range, 1-52 weeks). Their F/M ratio was 16/21 and the median age of the enrolled population was 58 years (range, 40-71 years). More than 70% of patients had 2 to 3 cytopenias, and 43% were transfusion dependent at enrollment. Most patients had intermediate 1-risk MDS by IPSS (n=29). Next-generation sequencing was performed in 35 patients (90%). The most frequently detected mutations included TET2 (n=15; 41%), SF3B1 (n=7; 19%), ASXL1 (n=5, 13%), RUNX1 (n= 5, 13%), and SRSF2 (n=3, 8%). The ORR after 2 cycles of decitabine was 65% (24/37),with 35% of patients (13/35) achieving a CR. Hematologic improvement was seen in 19%(7/37). The median time to best response was 3 months (range, 1-12 months). The median number of cycles received was 5 (range, 1-13 cycles). 19% of patients (7/37) became transfusion independent. The EFS and OS were 68% and 78% respectively in 1 year. The treatment was well-tolerated, with most adverse events being of grade 1 to 2, Nausea (24%), Fatigue (14%), Infection/Neutropenic fever (19%), Constipation (6%), Diarrhea (6%). Grade 3 and higher nonhematologic adverse events were rare. Grade 3 adverse events were Infection/Neutropenic fever (6%), but rare, and no grade 4 adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm that decitabine is a feasible and effective agent for low- or intermediate 1-risk MDS pts, and its need longer time to response (more than 2 cycles). Safety profile was acceptable and the most adverse events were Nausea, Fatigue, and Infection/Neutropenic fever. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

First-line nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) plus two cycles of chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo alone (4 cycles) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Two-year update from CheckMate 9LA.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9000-9000
Author(s):  
Martin Reck ◽  
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu ◽  
Manuel Cobo ◽  
Michael Schenker ◽  
Bogdan Zurawski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

9000 Background: In the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 9LA trial (NCT03215706), first-line NIVO + IPI combined with 2 cycles of chemo significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) vs chemo alone (4 cycles). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level and histology. Here we report data with 2 years’ minimum follow-up from this study. Methods: Adult patients (pts) with stage IV / recurrent NSCLC, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, and no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were stratified by PD-L1 (< 1% vs ≥ 1%), sex, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 360 mg Q3W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W + chemo (2 cycles; n = 361) or chemo alone (4 cycles; n = 358). Pts with non-squamous NSCLC in the chemo-alone arm could receive pemetrexed maintenance. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included PFS and ORR by blinded independent central review, and efficacy by different PD-L1 levels. Safety was exploratory. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 24.4 months for OS (database lock: Feb 18, 2021), pts treated with NIVO + IPI + chemo continued to derive OS benefit vs chemo, with a median OS of 15.8 months vs 11.0 months, respectively (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.61–0.86]); 2-year OS rates were 38% vs 26%. Median PFS with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was 6.7 months vs 5.3 months (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56–0.79]); 8% and 37% of pts who had disease progression received subsequent immunotherapy, respectively. ORR was 38% with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs 25% with chemo. Similar clinical benefit with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was observed in all randomized pts and across the majority of subgroups, including by PD-L1 expression level (Table) or histology. Any grade and grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 92% and 48% of pts in the NIVO + IPI + chemo arm vs 88% and 38% in the chemo arm, respectively. Conclusion: With 2 years’ minimum follow-up, first-line NIVO + IPI + chemo demonstrated durable survival and benefit versus chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC; no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03215706. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals The Outcomes of Nivolumab Fixed Dose 40 Mg Therapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 6-6
Author(s):  
Liudmila Fedorova ◽  
Kirill Lepik ◽  
Polina Kotselyabina ◽  
Elena Kondakova ◽  
Yuri Zalyalov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Published Data ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

Background Currently, the recommended dose of nivolumab for patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (r/r сHL) is 3 mg/kg. Nevertheless, published clinical cases indicate the possible efficacy of lower doses of nivolumab. Moreover, experimental studies provided the rationale for possible reduction of nivolumab dose in patients with solid tumors (Agrawal et al. 2016). The presented data creates prerequisites for studying the lower nivolumab doses efficacy and safety in the r/r cHL therapy. Patients and Methods This study included 42 patients (14 male/28 female) with r/r cHL who were treated with nivolumab 40 mg every 2 weeks. The median age of patients was 36 (22-53) years. The median number of prior therapy lines was 4 (2-7). Prior treatment contained high dose chemotherapy with ASCT in 9 pts (21%), brentuximab vedotin in 14 pts (33%) and allo-HSCT in 1 pt (2%). Four pts (9,5%) had the partial response (PR) and the remaining 38 pts (90,5%) had the disease progression (PD) at the moment of nivolumab initiation. B-symptoms were present in 23 pts (55%), ECOG status was grade 0-I in 25 pts (59,5%), grade II in 12 pts (29%), grade III in 4 pts (9,5%) and grade IV in 1 pt (2%). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) determined by positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using LYRIC criteria every 3 months. Key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Adverse events (AE) were evaluated according to CTCAE 4.03. The patient group characteristics were evaluated using descriptive statistics methods, the survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meyer method (SPSS Statistics v.17). Results The median number of nivolumab cycles was 24 (2-38). The response was evaluated in 41 out of 42 pts. The ORR was 66%. The best response included complete response (CR) in 39%, PR in 27%, stable disease in 5%, PD in 2%, indeterminate response (IR) in 27% of pts. With a median follow-up of 27,5 mo (11,3-34,5) 41 pts (97,6%) were alive, the median OS was not reached. The 2-year PFS was 44,5% (95% CI, 28,2-59,6) The nivolumab therapy was discontinued in 39 pts (93%) due to scheduled discontinuation in 14 pts (33%), PD in 13 pts (31%), grade 3-4 AE in 2 pts (5%), change of therapy because of insufficient response in 6 pts (14%) and other reasons in 4 pts (10%). The progression of disease during nivolumab therapy was present in 14 (33%) pts and after nivolumab discontinuation in 6 (14%) pts. After disease progression 30 pts (71%) were retreated with nivolumab monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. The median time to additional therapy was 14,5 mo (4,2 -32,9). The adverse events of any severity were observed in 30 pts (71%). Grade 3 or higher AE were present in 4 pts (9,5%), including grade 3 arthralgia, grade 3 anemia, grade 4 pneumonia and pneumonitis, grade 4 increased level of alanine aminotransferase and grade 5 MDS in 1 pt. A significant reduction of PD1+CD3+ cell population of peripheral blood lymphocytes was observed after first nivolumab cycle (median 0.7% (0-1.7) versus 33% (15.7-80.1) before therapy initiation, p = 0.02, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Conclusion Our study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab 40 mg therapy. The presented results are comparable to previously published data of nivolumab 3 mg/kg therapy in patients with r/r cHL. Thus, this creates a basis for further direct comparative study of nivolumab efficacy in different doses Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Docetaxel With or Without Gefitinib in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1405-1414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanassios Argiris ◽  
Musie Ghebremichael ◽  
Jill Gilbert ◽  
Ju-Whei Lee ◽  
Kamakshi Sachidanandam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose We hypothesized that the addition of gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, to docetaxel would enhance therapeutic efficacy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients and Methods Patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2, or patients with ECOG performance status of 0 to 2 but were previously treated with chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive weekly docetaxel plus either placebo (arm A) or gefitinib 250 mg/d, orally (arm B) until disease progression. At the time of progression, patients in the placebo arm could receive single-agent gefitinib. EGFR, c-MET, and KRAS mutations and polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters were evaluated by pyrosequencing. Results Two hundred seventy patients were enrolled before the study was closed early at interim analysis (arm A, n = 136; arm B, n = 134). Median overall survival was 6.0 months in arm A versus 7.3 months in arm B (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.21; P = .60). An unplanned subset analysis showed that gefitinib improved survival in patients younger than 65 years (median 7.6 v 5.2 months; P = .04). Also, there was a trend for improved survival in patients with c-MET wild-type (5.7 v 3.6 months; P = .09) regardless of treatment. Grade 3/4 toxicities were comparable between the two arms except that grade 3/4 diarrhea was more common with docetaxel/gefitinib. Of 18 eligible patients who received gefitinib after disease progression in arm A, one patient had a partial response. Conclusion The addition of gefitinib to docetaxel was well tolerated but did not improve outcomes in poor prognosis but otherwise unselected patients with SCCHN.

Fludarabine and Mitoxantrone for the Refractory Relapse Treatment of B-Cell Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL): LACOHG First Interim Report (Latin American Cooperative Oncology Hematology Group).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4665-4665
Author(s):  
Severiano Baltazar-Arellano ◽  
Patricia Pimentel ◽  
Luis Vera ◽  
Fernando Bezares ◽  
Jose Málaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Ann Arbor ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: fludarabine (F) is licensed for the management of indolent non Hodgkin’s lymphoma in countries such as Canada and Switzerland. Clinical evidence suggests that fludarabine monotherapy is as least as effective, than conventional therapies such as cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (CVP) for the first and second line treatment of B-cell low grade NHL achieving objective response rates. Better response rates can be achieved combining F with Mitoxantrone (M) in low grade NHL even in refractory relapsed (RR) patients (pts). The Latin American Cooperative Oncology Hematology Group (LACOHG) proposed a multicenter study in Latin American countries in 2002 to use FM in RR B-cell low grade NHL. Aims: to assess the response rate, safety, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of FM in RR B-cell low grade NHL during (2003–2006). Methods: Forty-eight patients in the period of January 2003 to February 2006 were evaluated. Forty-four pts. had follicular lymphoma and 4 small lymphocytic lymphoma. Median age 63.5 years old (range: 24–83). Gender: female 56% and male 44%. Inclusion criteria for low grade NHL-LG was: any previous treatment excluding autologous transplantation, Ann Arbor stage II to IV, age &gt; 18 years old, ECOG performance status 0–2 and written informed consent. ECOG performance status 0: 2%, 1: 71% and 2: 27%. Ann Arbor staging: II: 2%, III: 29% and IV: 69%. International Prognostic Index (IPI): 0–1: 19%, 2–3: 71% and 4–5: 10%. Median previous treatment was 1 (range: 1–3). FM treatment consisted of F 25 mg/m2 i.v. (day 1–3) and M 10 mg/m m2 i.v. (day 1) each 28 days for 6–8 cycles. Results: on this low grade NHL cohort the overall response rate (ORR was 81%; progressive disease and non-response 19%. With a median follow up of 17 months, OS at 24 months was 86% (DE 5.2%) and DFS at 24 months 57.1% (DE 11.3%). LDH in serum was not an adverse prognostic factor for DFS and OS. Safety: on the 286 cycles in 48 pts, the toxicity was: 18 episodes of grade 3-4 neutropenias, 15 episodes of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia, 7 episodes of grade 1–2 nausea/vomiting, grade 1–2 diarrhea in 4 pts, 8 pts were admitted to the clinic, 11 fever episodes, 2 allopecia, 4 pts developed grade 1–2 peripheral neuropathy and infections 7%: one case herpes zoster. Mortality rate: 12,5% (6/48 patients), 5 of them because progressive disease. No cardiac toxicity was reported. Conclusions: FM is an effective and safe treatment for RR low grade NHL. A longer follow up and a larger trial, might be needed to confirm these results in a multicenter, randomized study. DFS with FM in RR low grade NHL : LACOHG DFS with FM in RR low grade NHL : LACOHG

A phase I clinical study of biweekly carboplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12024-12024
Author(s):  
P. Kumar ◽  
M. Keshtgarpour ◽  
H. Kumar ◽  
A. Dudek
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dose Levels

12024 Background: Carboplatin (CBDCA) and gemcitabine (GEM) in combination is used commonly in lung cancer and is administered on a 21 day cycle. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CBDCA and GEM administered on a biweekly schedule and to assess safety and efficacy of this schedule. Methods: GEM was given intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes followed by CBDCA also given IV over 30 minutes. This combination was given on day 1 every 2 weeks. The dose levels examined are shown in the Table . A total of 26 patients were studied (18 male, 8 female) with median age of 56 (range 41–83 years); ECOG performance status of 24 patients were 0 (5), 1 (16), 2 (2), 3 (1); prior chemotherapy ranged from 0 to 4 regimens; median number of cycles administered per patient was 3 (range 1–9) with a total of 81 cycles. The primary tumors were lung (11), melanoma (4), head and neck (3), squamous cell penile/toe (2), bladder (2), kidney (1), gastric (1), esophageal (1) and ovary (1). Results: No DLTs were seen in any of these patients and the MTD was not reached. Delay in treatment was seen in total of 6 cycles due to myelosuppression and 1 cycle due to nausea and anorexia. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity rates: anemia - 3/81 cycles (3.7%), neutropenia - 20/81 cycles (25%), and thrombocytopenia - 4/81 cycles (5%). Non-hematological toxicity was mild. The median time to progression was 40 days (range 4–133) and of 18 evaluable patients partial response or stable disease was seen in 7 (38.8%). Conclusions: Even at maximum tested dose of GEM at 2000 mg/m2 and CBDCA at AUC of 3.0, this schedule is well tolerated. Hematological toxicity such as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was minimal. We plan to study this schedule of GEM and CBDCA in appropriate tumor types in combination with biologic agents. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Pemetrexed (MTA) and carboplatin (CBDCA) in the treatment of advanced pleural mesothelioma (MPM)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7093-7093 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Castagneto ◽  
M. Mencoboni ◽  
D. Degiovanni ◽  
A. Muzio ◽  
L. Giaretto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Entire Group ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

7093 Background: Aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of MTA and CBDCA combination as first line chemotherapy in advanced MPM. Methods: Chemonaive patients (pts) with histologically proven, an ECOG performance status (PS) 0–2, and measurable advanced MPM were considered. The schedule of administration was: pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 in combination with CBDA AUC 5, once every 21 days for 8 cycles. Results: From July 2003 to March 2005 76 pts (54 male and 22 female) have been treated with this combination chemotherapy. Median age was 62.7 years (range 40–70); median PS 0 (range 0–3); epithelial histologic findings were in 57 (75%), mixed in 13 (17.1%), sarcomatous in 3 (3.9%), and unspecified in 3 (3.9%) pts. A total of 537 cycles was administered (median 7, range 1 to 13). Grade 3 hematologic toxicity according to WHO criteria was seen in 43 (56.6%) pts (neutropenia in 30, thrombocytopenia in 8, and anemia in 5); grade 4 hematologic toxicity in 5 (6.6%) pts. The most common nonhematologic events were grade 3 nausea/vomiting in 10 (13.1%), and fever in 4 (5.3%) pts. 74 pts were evaluable for clinical response. There were 16 (21.%) partial responses (PR) and 3 (3.9%) complete responses (CR), for an overall response rate of 23.9%. 29 (38.2%) pts reported stable disease (SD). The overall survival was considered from date of diagnosis to date of death from any cause or to date of last follow-up. The median survival time for the entire group was estimated at 23 months. Conclusions: The results of this phase II study indicate that, at this dose and schedule, the combination of CBDCA and MTA is moderately active and that the profile of toxicity is acceptable in pts with advanced MPM. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A randomized, double-blind phase II study of the oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) axitinib (AG-013736) in combination with docetaxel (DOC) compared to DOC plus placebo (PL) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1003-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. S. Rugo ◽  
A. Stopeck ◽  
A. A. Joy ◽  
S. Chan ◽  
S. Verma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Grade 3

1003 Background: Single-agent DOC is commonly used to treat MBC. Axitinib (AG) is a potent TKI of VEGFRs. A phase I lead-in study identified 80 mg/m2 q3wks of DOC in combination with 5 mg BID of AG as the recommended phase 2 dose. The primary objective was to determine whether the time to progression (TTP) of AG+DOC arm is superior to DOC+PL. Methods: Pts with no prior chemotherapy for MBC and =12 mos from adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT), measurable disease, ECOG performance status (PS) of 0–2, and no uncontrolled brain metastases were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive treatment with either DOC+AG or DOC+PL without prophylactic growth factor in cycle 1. Tumor measurements were performed q9wks. Pts were stratified according to estrogen receptor (ER) status, prior aCT and PS (0–1 or 2). Results: A total of 168 pts were randomized. 92 pts had received prior aCT, 27 of whom received a prior taxane. Treatment arms were well balanced for prior adjuvant and taxane therapy. A median of 7 cycles of AG+DOC (range: 1–18) and 7 cycles of DOC+PL (range: 1–23) were administered. The most common non-hematologic adverse events observed in the AG+DOC arm included diarrhea (60%), nausea (53%), alopecia (51%), fatigue (49%), stomatitis (44%) and vomiting (40%). Grade 3/4 adverse events that were increased with AG+DOC vs DOC included febrile neutropenia (16 vs 7%), fatigue (13 vs 5%), stomatitis (13 vs 2%), diarrhea (11 vs 0%) and hypertension (5 vs 2%). Other grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were similar in both arms. The median TTP (by RECIST) was 8.2 mo with AG+DOC arm and 7 mo with DOC+PL arm with a hazard ratio of 0.73 (prespecified, one-sided p=0.052). The overall response rate (ORR) was 40% for AG+DOC arm and 23% for DOC+PL arm (p=0.038). In a hypothesis-generating subgroup analysis, the median TTP in patients receiving prior aCT was 9.0 mo with AG+DOC arm and 6.3 mo with DOC+PL arm with a hazard ratio of 0.54 (p=0.012). Within this stratum, ORR was 45% for AG+DOC arm and 13% for DOC+PL arm (p=0.003). Conclusions: The anti-angiogenic TKI AG combined with DOC (80 mg/m2 q3wks) as first line therapy for MBC has an acceptable safety profile and promising anti-tumor activity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II trial of gemcitabine, docetaxel, and bevacizumab (GDB) in metastatic pancreas cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4606-4606
Author(s):  
V. J. Picozzi ◽  
L. A. Canlas ◽  
P. L. Sicuro ◽  
T. W. Malpass
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Marker ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Pancreas Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Ca 19.9 ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3

4606 Background: Metastatic pancreas cancer (MPC) remains identified with poor outcome. Benchmark response statistics in MPC include response rate (RR) 20–30%, time to disease progression (TTP) 3.5–5.5 mo, median overall survival (OS) 6–9 mo and 1- year (yr) OS 20–30%. At our center, adding docetaxel (D) to G in MPC produced 6.0 mo TTP and 10.5 mo OS (Jacobs et.al. Canc Invest 2004). As bevacizumab (B) added to combination chemotherapy has produced major improvement in OS for other cancers (e.g. colon cancer), we chose to study the GDB regimen in MPC. Methods: Our study was phase II, single-phase. Eligiblity criteria included 1) diagnosis of MPC, 2) chemotherapy naivity, 3) ECOG performance status 0 /1, 4) organ function adequate for therapy. Therapy included G 1000 mg/m2 IV bolus, D 40 mg/m2 IV and B 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks (wks) for 1 yr unless disease progression or prohibitive treatment toxicity occurred. Patients were radiographically restaged every 8 wks. Primary endpoint was TTP. Secondary endpoints included therapy toxicity, radiographic RR (RECIST criteria), tumor marker RR (CA 19.9) and OS. Results: Of 27 enrolled patients (pts), 25 pts are currently evaluable for response, 24 pts for TTP. Median age is 58 yrs. Primary metastatic disease sites were liver (n=18), peritoneum ( n=6), lymph node ( n=2) and lung (n=1). 7/27 pts (26%) experienced grade 3 or higher treatment-related toxicity, including pulmonary (n=3), neutropenia (n=3), bleeding events (n=3), VTE (n=2), hypertension (n=1), hypokalemia (n=1) and skin rash (n=1). 1 pt died from respiratory failure, possibly therapy-related. To date, disease control at 8 wks is 100% (24/24 pts) radiographic RR is 48% (12/25 pts) and tumor marker RR is 95% (18/19 evaluable pts expressed CA19.9, median decline 80%, 5 pts normalized) . Of 24 pts evaluable for TTP, 9/18 (50%) initial pts achieved > 9 mo TTP (range 9.2–18.5 mo); the remaining 6 pts continue progression-free on therapy (range 2+-7+ mo). Median OS has not been reached and will be > 8.3 mo. Response data will be updated at the meeting. Conclusions: 1) The GDB regimen is overall well-tolerated; pulmonary toxicity was the major therapy-related toxicity concern. 2) GDB is significantly active in MPC as witnessed by response rates achieved. 3) Further study of the GDB regimen in MPC is warranted. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document