Cabozantinib versus other TKIs after CPI treatment in the real-world management of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 293-293
Author(s):  
Florence Marteau ◽  
Brooke Harrow ◽  
Christine McCarthy ◽  
Joel Wallace ◽  
Alisha Monnette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
P Value ◽  
The Real ◽  
The Us

293 Background: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are a treatment option for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but there is limited clinical data on the efficacy of targeted therapies following CPI treatment. Cabozantinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets multiple receptor kinases implicated in tumorigenesis. In the US, cabozantinib is approved for use in patients with advanced RCC including after CPI treatment. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study (NCT04353765) evaluated outcomes associated with cabozantinib or other TKIs (axitinib, lenvatinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, sunitinib) in patients with mRCC following CPI treatment. Eligible patients initiated TKI therapy between May 1, 2016 and Sep 31, 2019 and had received a CPI as their last systemic treatment prior to TKI therapy. Patients were identified from the US Oncology Network iKnowMed electronic health record database through structured queries and a targeted chart review. The following real-world outcomes were assessed: 6-month response rate (RR6months; primary); overall response rate (ORR); overall survival (OS); time to treatment discontinuation (TTD); rates of dose reductions, and discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). The p value for RR6months was used to test for non-inferiority. Results: Eligible patients ( n = 247) had a mean (SD) age of 65.9 (10.5) years and 74.1% were male; 75.7% ( n = 187) received cabozantinib and 24.3% ( n = 60) received other TKIs. All patients had intermediate or poor MSKCC score; more poor-risk patients received cabozantinib than other TKIs (28.9% vs 20%). Outcomes data are shown in the Table. Compared with other TKIs, cabozantinib was associated with a significantly higher RR6months and ORR, and TTD was twice as long with cabozantinib. Discontinuation due to AEs was more frequent with other TKIs than with cabozantinib, although this was not statistically significant; 21.7% of discontinuations occurred during the first 3 months of treatment. AEs leading to discontinuation were consistent with the known safety profile of the products. Conclusions: In this mRCC population receiving routine care in the US, cabozantinib was used more frequently than other TKIs after CPI treatment. Cabozantinib was an effective and well tolerated option post-CPI, with a high response rate in the real-world setting.abozantinib was associated with a significantly higher response rate and a lower discontinuation rate due to AEs; TTD was double that of other TKIs. [Table: see text]

Cabozantinib versus other TKIs after CPI treatment in the real-world management of patients with mRCC.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16539-e16539
Author(s):  
Florence Marteau ◽  
Brooke Harrow ◽  
Christine McCarthy ◽  
Joel Wallace ◽  
Alisha Monnette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
P Value ◽  
The Real ◽  
The Us ◽  
Risk Patients

e16539 Background: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are a treatment option for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but there is limited clinical data on the efficacy of targeted therapies following CPI treatment. Cabozantinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets multiple receptor kinases implicated in tumorigenesis. In the US, cabozantinib is approved for use in patients with advanced RCC including after CPI treatment. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study (NCT04353765) evaluated outcomes associated with cabozantinib or other TKIs (axitinib, lenvatinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, sunitinib) in patients with mRCC following CPI treatment. Eligible patients initiated TKI therapy between May 1, 2016 and Sep 31, 2019 and had received a CPI as their last systemic treatment prior to TKI therapy. Patients were identified from the US Oncology Network iKnowMed electronic health record database through structured queries and a targeted chart review. The following real-world outcomes were assessed: 6-month response rate (RR6months; primary); overall response rate (ORR); overall survival (OS); time to treatment discontinuation (TTD); rates of dose reductions, and discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). The p value for RR6months (χ2 test) was used to test for non-inferiority. Results: Eligible patients ( n = 247) had a mean (SD) age of 65.9 (10.5) years and 74.1% were male; 75.7% ( n = 187) received cabozantinib and 24.3% ( n = 60) received other TKIs. All patients had intermediate or poor MSKCC score; more poor-risk patients received cabozantinib than other TKIs (28.9% vs 20%). Outcomes data are shown in the Table. Compared with other TKIs, cabozantinib was associated with a significantly higher RR6months and ORR, and TTD was twice as long with cabozantinib. Discontinuation due to AEs was more frequent with other TKIs than with cabozantinib, although this was not statistically significant; 21.7% of discontinuations occurred during the first 3 months of treatment. AEs leading to discontinuation were consistent with the known safety profile of the products. Conclusions: In this mRCC population receiving routine care in the US, cabozantinib was used more frequently than other TKIs after CPI treatment. Cabozantinib was an effective and well tolerated option post-CPI, with a high response rate in the real-world setting.abozantinib was associated with a significantly higher response rate and a lower discontinuation rate due to AEs; TTD was double that of other TKIs. Clinical trial information: NCT04353765. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: The CheckMate 016 Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (34) ◽  
pp. 3851-3858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans J. Hammers ◽  
Elizabeth R. Plimack ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
David F. McDermott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

Purpose Combination treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown enhanced antitumor activity compared with monotherapy in tumor types such as melanoma. The open-label, parallel-cohort, dose-escalation, phase I CheckMate 016 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in combination, and nivolumab plus a tyrosine kinase inhibitor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Safety and efficacy results from the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arms of the study are presented. Patients and Methods Patients with mRCC received intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg (N3I1), nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (N1I3), or nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (N3I3) every 3 weeks for four doses followed by nivolumab monotherapy 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until progression or toxicity. End points included safety (primary), objective response rate, and overall survival (OS). Results All patients in the N3I3 arm (n = 6) were censored at the time of analysis as a result of dose-limiting toxicity or other reasons. Forty-seven patients were treated in both the N3I1 and the N1I3 arm, and baseline patient characteristics were balanced between arms. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 38.3% and 61.7% of the patients in the N3I1 and N1I3 arms, respectively. At a median follow-up of 22.3 months, the confirmed objective response rate was 40.4% in both arms, with ongoing responses in 42.1% and 36.8% of patients in the N3I1 and N1I3 arms, respectively. The 2-year OS was 67.3% and 69.6% in the N3I1 and N1I3 arms, respectively. Conclusion Nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy demonstrated manageable safety, notable antitumor activity, and durable responses with promising OS in patients with mRCC.

scholarly journals Managing metastatic renal cell carcinoma-challenges, pitfalls, and outcomes in the real world

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 260
Author(s):  
KarnamAshok Kumar ◽  
Gundeti Sadashivudu ◽  
KV Krishnamani ◽  
VijayGandhi Linga ◽  
LakshmiSrinivas Maddali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
The Real

scholarly journals Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score associated with survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. e002851
Author(s):  
Jacqueline T Brown ◽  
Yuan Liu ◽  
Julie M Shabto ◽  
Dylan Martini ◽  
Deepak Ravindranathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Glasgow Prognostic Score ◽  
Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score

BackgroundThe modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) is a composite biomarker that uses albumin and C reactive protein (CRP). There are multiple immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations approved for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We investigated the ability of mGPS to predict outcomes in patients with mRCC receiving ICI.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients with mRCC treated with ICI as monotherapy or in combination at Winship Cancer Institute between 2015 and 2020. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were measured from the start date of ICI until death or clinical/radiographical progression, respectively. The baseline mGPS was defined as a summary score based on pre-ICI values with one point given for CRP>10 mg/L and/or albumin<3.5 g/dL, resulting in possible scores of 0, 1 and 2. If only albumin was low with a normal CRP, no points were awarded. Univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA) were carried out using Cox proportional hazard model. Outcomes were also assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.Results156 patients were included with a median follow-up 24.2 months. The median age was 64 years and 78% had clear cell histology. Baseline mGPS was 0 in 36%, 1 in 40% and 2 in 24% of patients. In UVA, a baseline mGPS of 2 was associated with shorter OS (HR 4.29, 95% CI 2.24 to 8.24, p<0.001) and PFS (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.01, p=0.006) relative to a score of 0; this disparity in outcome based on baseline mGPS persisted in MVA. The respective median OS of patients with baseline mGPS of 0, 1 and 2 was 44.5 (95% CI 27.3 to not evaluable), 15.3 (95% CI 11.0 to 24.2) and 10 (95% CI 4.6 to 17.5) months (p<0.0001). The median PFS of these three cohorts was 6.7 (95% CI 3.6 to 13.1), 4.2 (95% CI 2.9 to 6.2) and 2.6 (95% CI 2.0 to 5.6), respectively (p=0.0216). The discrimination power of baseline mGPS to predict survival outcomes was comparable to the IMDC risk score based on Uno’s c-statistic (OS: 0.6312 vs 0.6102, PFS: 0.5752 vs 0.5533).ConclusionThe mGPS is prognostic in this cohort of patients with mRCC treated with ICI as monotherapy or in combination. These results warrant external and prospective validation.

191 Association of immune related adverse events with the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A205-A206
Author(s):  
Vasilii Bushunow ◽  
Leonard Appleman ◽  
Roby Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Kaplan Meier

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are first-line therapy for tumors including metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Use of ICI is complicated by diverse immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can add significant morbidity but are also associated with improved efficacy of therapy.1 2 Risk factors for development of irAE are still poorly understood. We hypothesized that patients with mRCC treated with ICI as first-line therapy have higher rates of developing irAE’s than patients previously treated with other therapies.MethodsWe conducted a single-institution, retrospective medical record review of patients with mRCC treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors from March 2011 through April 15, 2020. We identified therapy duration, and presence, severity, and treatment of adverse events. We defined overall survival as time elapsed from date of diagnosis until death or until completion of study. We classified severity of adverse events according to CTCAE guidelines. Statistical methods included univariate Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models, and Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for subgroups.ResultsA total of 64 unique charts were reviewed. 18 patients (28%) of patients were treated with ICI as first-line therapy. 28 patients (44%) experienced immune-related adverse events with a total of 40 irAE’s identified. Most irAE were grade I-II (78%), with 7 (17%) grade III and 1 (2.4%) grade IV irAE’s. Most common sites were skin (29%), thyroid (20%) and gastrointestinal (15%). Patients with irAE had increased survival compared to those who did not have irAE (median survival not reached, vs 139 weeks, p=0.0004) (figure 1). This finding remained after excluding patients who had only experienced dermatologic irAE (median survival not reached in non-derm irAE subgroup, vs 144 weeks for dermatologic or no irAE, p=0.01) (figure 2). Patients treated with ICI as first line therapy had greater rates of developing irAE (72%) than those who had prior therapies (32%) (OR 5.4; p = 0.006). There was no association between histology type and rate of irAE.Abstract 191 Figure 1Kaplan-Meier survival plot of OS between patients with any irAE and those without any irAEAbstract 191 Figure 2Kaplan-Meier survival plot of OS between patients with non-dermatologic irAE and those without any irAE or only dermatologic irAEConclusionsThe development of irAE’s in patients with mRCC treated with ICI is associated with longer survival. This study joins the growing body of evidence showing that presence of irAE’s is associated with increased treatment efficacy. Use of ICI as first-line therapy is associated with higher risk of irAE. Given growing use of ICI as first-line therapy, further study to predict onset and severity of irAE’s is required.AcknowledgementsHong Wang, PhD, for statistical support.Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board. Approval number STUDY19100386.ReferencesElias R, Yan N, Singla N, Levonyack N, Formella J, Christie A, et al. Immune-related adverse events are associated with improved outcomes in ICI-treated renal cell carcinoma patients. J Clin Oncol 2019;37(7):S645.Verzoni E, Cartenì G, Cortesi E, et al. Real-world efficacy and safety of nivolumab in previously-treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and association between immune-related adverse events and survival: the Italian expanded access program. J Immunother Cancer 2019;7(1):99.

scholarly journals Checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium

Cancer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 124 (18) ◽  
pp. 3677-3683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven M. Yip ◽  
Connor Wells ◽  
Raphael Moreira ◽  
Alex Wong ◽  
Sandy Srinivas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors

scholarly journals MP25-05 THE IMPACT OF CYTOREDUCTIVE NEPHRECTOMY IN METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA – A REAL-WORLD INVESTIGATION IN THE TKI ERA

2019 ◽  
Vol 201 (Supplement 4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Janisch ◽  
Constantin Fühner ◽  
Christian P. Meyer ◽  
Tobias Hillemacher ◽  
Thomas Klotzbücher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Cytoreductive Nephrectomy ◽  
The Impact
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document