scholarly journals SAT-175 Trial in Progress Interim Report: A Phase II Clinical Trial Using Single Agent Cabozantinib in Advanced Adrenocortical Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Shokry Daniel Bedrose ◽  
Lina Altameemi ◽  
Marilyne Daher ◽  
Gina Tamsen De Rosa ◽  
Jeena Mary Varghese ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) in an aggressive malignancy with suboptimal response to frontline chemotherapy and without established second line treatment. cMET activation is associated with ACC resistance to chemotherapy. Cabozantinib is a multi-kinase inhibitor that targets the VEGFR, c-MET, AXL, and RET receptors. We report interim data about using cabozantinib in ACC through a prospective phase II clinical trial. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated, open label clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib in patients with unresectable/metastatic ACC (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03370718). The primary objective is 4-month progression-free survival rate (PFS4). Participants are ≥ 18 years old with histologically confirmed ACC. Subjects who used mitotane within 6 months of consent must have mitotane serum level of < 2 mg/L. Cabozantinib starting dose is 60 mg daily with possible dose reductions. Subjects stopped treatment at time of disease progression, death, or occurrence of severe adverse events. Objective tumor responses were assessed per RECIST v.1.1 criteria. Adverse effects were graded per CTCAE v.4.03 Results: At time of data cut off (Oct 28, 2019), we screened 16 patients for enrollment. Ten patients (3 females) received cabozantinib out of whom 5 had history of mitotane use. Nine patients were eligible for response evaluation, defined as having at least one follow up imaging. One patient was taken off study after one week due to hypertensive crisis. Median age at time of diagnosis was 45 years (range 32 - 72). Five patients had hormonally active ACC. Median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 2 (range 0 -5). Median duration of cabozantinib therapy was 6.6 months (range 0.7 -11.3). Eight patients (80%) were without evidence of progression at 4 months (achieved study endpoint). At time of data cut off, 1 patient had partial response (53% reduction over 8.8 months and ongoing), 3 patients had stable disease, and 5 patients had progressive disease. Nine patients were alive with disease and one patient died (not drug related). Grade 3/4 clinical adverse events included thromboembolic events (3 patients), severe hypertension (1 patient), intracranial hemorrhage secondary to hypertensive crisis (1 patient), weight loss (1 patient), and abdominal pain (1 patient). Grade 3/4 laboratory adverse events included increased AST (2 patient), increased ALT (1 patient), increased GGT, increased amylase (1 patient), increased lipase (1 patient) and hyponatremia (1 patient). Conclusions: In this interim analysis of phase II study, majority of subjects reached the study primary endpoint (PFS4). These data are in favor of continuing study accrual to assess magnitude of response to therapy and safety profile in ACC. Aggressive blood pressure management and close monitoring of liver enzymes are crucial to ensure the safety of study subjects.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2628-2628
Author(s):  
Aasems Jacob ◽  
Alexander Kreimer ◽  
Jing Wei ◽  
Jianrong Wu ◽  
Lauren Corum ◽  
...  

2628 Background: Preclinical models demonstrate that combined RT with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) results in specific CD8+ T-cell phenotype associated with a tumor-reactive population resulting in significant tumor response. Sequential treatment could allow radiation to release tumor antigens from immune inaccessible areas and provide robust anti-tumor immune response with ICI. We report an interim analysis of the phase II clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of the combination. Methods: Advanced NSCLC and HNSCC patients who had initiated on FDA approved single-agent ICI were eligible. Patients were given SBRT (BED>100Gy) or 30 Gy fractionated RT delivered as a 3-dimensional dose to a single metastatic site within 14 days of the first ICI dose. Primary objective was 6-month PFS and secondary objectives were safety and tolerability, 1Y PFS and OS. This interim analysis was done after enrollment of 43 patients. Results: Between 10/2017 to 1/2021, 43 patients were enrolled, and 38 included in this analysis. Median age was 62 years; 26 patients were male. 9 patients received ICI for NSCLC as first-line, 7 for NSCLC second-line and 22 for HNSCC second-line. 24 patients received pembrolizumab and 14 nivolumab; 21 had SBRT and 17 fractionated RT. Median follow up duration was 11.8m (range: 2.7 - 31.4m) for patients without progressive disease (PD). 10 patients were off-study, 7 continuing treatment. 15 died and 26 had PD. 14 patients died of malignancy and cause of death for one patient was unknown. 6-month PFS was 49.19% with median PFS of 5.5 months. (table) Fifty-two grade-3-5 adverse events (AEs) were reported among 21 subjects. Most common were transaminitis (n=15), lymphopenia (n=8), and GI side effects (n=4). Treatment related AEs included 19 grade-3 events, and none were grade 4/5. Two grade-5 AEs were from PD (oral bleeding and unspecified). There were 20 grade-1/2 and 3 grade-3 immune related adverse events (IRAEs). No grade-4/5 IRAEs were reported. Two patients discontinued treatment due to grade 3 transaminitis. Conclusions: Interim analysis shows that 6m PFS was acceptable with majority of patients being second-line metastatic HNSCC who historically had mPFS of 2.1-2.3 months and mOS 7.7-8.4 months in Checkmate-141/KEYNOTE-040 trials. Hence, the combination is of further interest and accrual will continue to reach the goal. The combination therapy was tolerable without unexpected AEs. Majority of deaths were from disease progression. No treatment related grade 4/5 adverse events were reported. Two patients discontinued treatment due to grade-3 IRAE. Clinical trial information: NCT03313804. [Table: see text]


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 59-59
Author(s):  
S. Niraula ◽  
U. Emmeneger ◽  
L. Adams ◽  
I. Tannock ◽  
S. S. Sridhar ◽  
...  

59 Background: Other than the androgen receptor, the TMPRSS2-ERG genomic aberrations in prostate cancer provide the first recent opportunity to target therapy in castration refractory prostate cancer (CRPC). We initiated a phase II clinical trial of cytarabine in docetaxel refractory CRPC on the basis of microarray, in vitro and case report evidence that cytarabine may be particularly effective in men harbouring abnormalities of the ERG oncogenes. Embedded in this clinical trial was the first use of blood mRNA levels of prostate cancer related genes as biomarkers of response and prognosis. Methods: Patients with docetaxel refractory progressive CRPC received intravenous cytarabine at doses between 1g/m2-0.25 g/m2 q3 weekly. Responses were defined according to PCWG2C. 10 patients were enrolled between June 2007 and January 2010. TMPRSS2:ERG, PSA and PCA3 mRNA copies in whole blood collected with PAXgene tubes at the beginning of each cycle and at trial termination were quantified using transcription-mediated amplification assays. The prototype TMPRSS2:ERG assay detects the gene fusion isoform TMPRSS2 exon1 to ERG exon4. Results: No patients demonstrated a serum PSA response (PCWG2C). The average number of cycles administered was 2.6. Significant toxicities including grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (2) and grade 3-4 neutropenia (3). These toxicities necessitated several dose reductions in the protocol, however most patients were removed from trial for serum PSA progression alone. PCA3 and PSA mRNAs were detectable in 8/10 and 9/10 cases, respectively; there was no correlation between serum PSA and PCA3 or PSA mRNA copy levels in blood. Testing for TMPRSS2:ERG in blood was able to predict the presence or absence of the TMPRSS2-ERG rearrangement in 9/10 cases when compared to 3 colour FISH carried out on baseline biopsies/ prostatectomies (2/10 positive for Exon 4:Exon 1 deletion). Conclusions: Cytarabine administation is ineffective in docetaxel refractory CRPC. Blood mRNA levels of prostate cancer genes reveal novel aspects of prostate cancer biology and have implications for the understanding of circulating tumour cells. [Table: see text]


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 253-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Park ◽  
H. Kim ◽  
J. Shim ◽  
S. Woo ◽  
J. Choi ◽  
...  

253 Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the palliative treatment for patients with unresectable HCC. TACE-induced ischemic injury is known to increase circulating VEGF and related with poor prognosis.The aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of combined TACE with sorafenib, VEGFR inhibitor in unresectable HCC patients. Methods: This study is a non-randomized, open-labeld, single-arm, phase II investigator-initiated clinical study. Estimated number of subjects was 50 under the assumption of 3.2 months of median time to progression (TTP) with TACE alone. All patients are Child-Pugh class A or superb B. Sorafenib begins to be administered on 3 days after the first session of TACE and will be subsequently administered up to 24 weeks. Efficacy of TACE was evaluated after 4 weeks from TACE by dynamic CT. Repeated TACE is performed “on demand” in case of PR or SD according to CT/MRI evaluation. Results: A total of 50 patients were enrolled for this interim analysis. Male was 84% and mean age was 61.5years. Causes of underlying chronic liver disease were HBV in 28 patients (65.1%). Patients were categorized into modified UICC stage II (15, 30.0%), III (24, 48.0%) and IVA (11, 22.0%). Median follow-up period was 5.3 months (range, 1.0–13.1). The size of index lesions was ranged from 1.0 cm to 13.1 cm, and number of lesions was between 1 and 5. Number of TACE sessions was 1.0 (range, 1–4). Common adverse events (AE) during sorafenib therapy were elevation of serum AST/ALT (96.8%), hypocalcemia (90.0%), thrombocytopenia (84.0%), and hyperbilirubinemia (76.0%). Hand-foot skin reaction was most frequently observed among AE of NCI CTCAE grade 3 or higher (40.0%), followed by elevation of serum ALT (38.0%). Dose reduction of sorafenib was needed most commonly due to hand-food skin reaction (n=29). Median TTP was 5.1 months (range, 3.8–6.3). Conclusions: Adverse events were approved as acceptable by independent monitoring system. Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity was also observed. This trial can be safely performed with close monitoring in inoperable and/or unresectable HCC patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2537-2537
Author(s):  
Jaleh Fallah ◽  
Rekha T. Chaudhary ◽  
Lisa R. Rogers ◽  
Wei Wei ◽  
Cathy J. Brewer ◽  
...  

2537 Background: Clinical trials of bevacizumab monotherapy and TTFields monotherapy have shown activity but limited clinical benefit in patients (pts) with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM), with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2-4 months and median overall survival (OS) of 6-9 months with either treatment modality. In a single-arm phase II clinical trial, the efficacy of the combination of bevacizumab and TTFields in pts with recurrent GBM was investigated. Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed GBM or other grade IV gliomas, who had disease progression after chemoradiation were enrolled in a phase II trial of the combination of bevacizumab and TTFields. Bevacizumab was given at a dose of 10 mg/Kg intravenously every 2 weeks and TTFields was worn by the pts continuously for more than 18 hours per day. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were PFS at 6 months and OS at 12 months. Survival outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log rank test. Treatment-related adverse events were reported according to CTCAE, v4.0 criteria. Results: From April 2013 to December 2017, 25 pts were enrolled and 23 were evaluable: 18 (78%) men and 5 (22%) women, median age 60 years (range 17–78). 21 pts were Caucasian, 1 was African American and 1 of unknown race. After a median follow up of 31.6 months (range: 4.1-59.0 months), 21 out of 23 pts died (4 women and 17 men). The median PFS was 4.1 months (95%CI, 3.6-9.5) and the median OS was 10.5 months (95% CI, 8.2-14.9). The PFS rate at 6 and 12 months were 33% and 19%, respectively. The OS rate at 6 and 12 months were 82% and 46%, respectively. Women had better OS and PFS compared to men, however, the difference was not statistically significant which can be due to the small study population (table). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities considered definitely or probably related to the treatment included hypertension (n = 1) and cerebral infarction (n = 1). Other reported grade 3-4 toxicities (n = 7) included cough, dysphagia, muscle weakness, hyperglycemia, psychosis, seizure, lymphopenia, transaminitis, and muscle weakness considered unlikely to be treatment-related. Conclusions: The combination of bevacizumab and TTFields in is safe and feasible and has clinical efficacy in pts with recurrent GBM. Clinical trial information: NCT01894061 . [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8033-8033
Author(s):  
Yuqin Song ◽  
Jun Zhu ◽  
Ningjing Lin ◽  
Mingzhi Zhang ◽  
Hai Bai ◽  
...  

8033 Background: classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) are characterized by genetic alterations at the 9p24·1 locus and PD-L1 ligand overexpression. GLS-010 is a novel fully human anti-PD-1 mAb and exhibited favorable result in previous Phase I study. This multi-center, single-arm Phase II clinical trial is aimed to further evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of GLS-010 in Chinese patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory cHL. Methods: All pts enrolled received GLS-010 240mg every 2 weeks until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity or withdraw from the study. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) per Lugona 2014. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI CTCAE v4.03. Results: 85 pts with relapsed or refractory cHL who had received at least 2 lines of prior systemic chemotherapies were enrolled and treated. As of August 2 2019, data cutoff, pts received a median of 8 treatment cycles (1 cycle include 2 injections), with 12 pts discontinued and 73 pts were still in treatment. At a median follow-up of 6.57 months, an ORR was reported in 78 of 85 patients (91.76%, 95%CI, 83.77-96.62), by an IRC assessment, including 30(35.3%) pts with a complete response (CR) and 48 pts (56.5%) with a partial response (PR). Median duration of response (DoR) and progression free survival (PFS) were not reached yet. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 77 (90.6%) of 85 patients, most of which were Grade 1-2.The most common TRAEs were fever (26/85, 30.6%), neutrophil count decreased (16/85, 18.82%), white blood cell count decreased (15/85, 17.65%). ≥ Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 23 (27.06%) pts, most commonly, hepatic function abnormal (5/85, 5.88%), hyperuricaemia (4/85, 4.71%). Conclusions: GLS-010 showed impressive anti-tumor activity (ORR = 91.96%) and manageable safety profile in Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory cHL, which could be a new safe and effective treatment option in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT03655483 .


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3205-3205
Author(s):  
Kartik Sehgal ◽  
Mehmet H. Kocoglu ◽  
Yanhong Deng ◽  
Rakesh Verma ◽  
Lin Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Pomalidomide (POM) is a novel IMiD(r) immunomodulatory agent with clinical activity in relapsed / resistant myeloma (RRMM) refractory to both lenalidomide and bortezomib. In prior phase II studies, the clinical activity of POM has been demonstrated using both continuous and intermittent dosing schedules. However the optimal dosing regimen for POM remains to be clarified and prospective data comparing these dosing schedules is limited. Herein we report the results of a randomized phase II clinical trial comparing the two POM dosing schedules. The primary objective was to compare clinical response to therapy (greater than or equal to partial response (PR) according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria). Patients (n=39) with RRMM documented to be refractory to lenalidomide were randomized to therapy with POM 2 mg/day for 28/28 days (Arm A, n=19) or POM 4 mg/day for 21/28 days (Arm B, n=20) of a 28 day cycle. All patients (pts) received POM alone at 2 or 4 mg for cycle 1, followed by the addition of dexamethasone at 40 mg weekly in subsequent cycles in both arms. Aspirin was utilized for thromboprophylaxis in both arms. Toxicity consisted primarily of myelosuppression which was manageable and similar in both cohorts. The incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) was 36% in arm A and 55% in arm B. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (common toxicity criteria v4.0) was the most common toxicity and was observed in 42% and 45% of patients in arm A and arm B respectively. There was no treatment-emergent grade 3 or 4 neuropathy observed in either arm. Only one patient (in arm B) experienced grade 3 / 4 thromboembolic complication. Overall, objective response to therapy (greater than or equal to PR by IMWG criteria) was observed in 21% (4/19 patients) in arm A and 45% (9/20 patients) in arm B (p=0.18). There were no complete remissions in either cohort. Patients in arm B did have greater maximal reduction in measurable disease compared to arm A (percent maximal reduction mean (+ SD) 54% (+ 34%) in arm B versus 28% (+ 35%) in arm A, p=0.02). However both cohorts had comparable event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). The mean EFS in arm A and arm B was 4.4 months (95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.21 months, 7.67 months) and 5.1 months (95% CI 3.4 months, 9.2 months) respectively (p=0.56). Similarly the median OS in the arm A (17.7 months, 95% CI 10.02, not reached) was similar to that in arm B (17.7 months, 95% CI 9.98, not reached)(p=0.73). These data demonstrate in the context of a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial that both continuous (28/28) and intermittent (21/28) dosing regimens of POM with dexamethasone have remarkable clinical activity in this heavily pretreated MM population. These data provide further support towards the choice of POM at 4 mg/day for 21/28 days for phase III testing. The finding that intermittent dosing at 4 mg/day led to greater maximal cytoreduction of measurable disease compared to continuous dosing at 2 mg/day, without any differences in survival suggests that understanding the biology of residual disease will be essential to further improving outcome in these patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 499-499
Author(s):  
Takashi Iwata

499 Background: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in rectal cancer reduces the local recurrence rate after operation and preserves the anus, but it is difficult to predict the effects of CRT. Multicenter randomized phase II clinical trial of preoperative chemoradiotherapy by S-1 vs UFT for rectal cancer was conducted to compare the toxicity and efficacy of CRT using oral DPD-inhibitory fluoropyrimidines (UFT versus S-1, (UMIN ID: 000001704)) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: In this randomized phase II study, during April 2008 to October 2010, rectal cancer patients (n=59) who underwent preoperative CRT were randomly divided into two groups; S-1 group (n=30, 80 mg/m2/day, 5 days/w x 4 w), and UFT (n=29, 300 mg/m2/day, 5 days/w x 4 w). Both groups were combined with 40Gy radiotherapy (2 Gy ×5 days/w × 4 weeks,total 40 Gy). The pathological response rate, clinical response rate by RECIST, and frequency of adverse events of CRT were compared between S-1 group and UFT group. Results: Response to CRT determined by histopathologic examination of surgically resected specimens and RECIST were as follows: responders (grade 2 or 3) were 60% (S-1) and 52% (UFT) (p=0.52). S-1 group showed 54% of response rate in pathological response, whereas UFT group showed 45% (p=0.43). In adverse events, frequence of Grade 2 and 3 diarrhea was significantly higher in S-1 group compared with UFT group. There was no difference between the two groups in compliance (S-1group: 83%, UFT group: 97%). Conclusions: Both S-1 and UFT were safely used for preoperative CRT. S-1 tended to show higher response rate than UFT, although diarrhea in S-1 was higher than in UFT. Clinical trial information: 000001704.


Author(s):  
Mouhammed Amir Habra ◽  
Bettzy Stephen ◽  
Matthew Campbell ◽  
Kenneth Hess ◽  
Coya Tapia ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline Byakika-Kibwika ◽  
Christine Sekaggya-Wiltshire ◽  
Jerome Roy Semakula ◽  
Jane Nakibuuka ◽  
Joseph Musaazi ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundSeveral repurposed drugs such as hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have been investigated for treatment of COVID-19, but none was confirmed to be efficacious. While in vitro studies have demonstrated antiviral properties of HCQ, data from clinical trials were conflicting regarding its benefit for COVID-19 treatment. Drugs that limit viral replication may be beneficial in the earlier course of the disease thus slowing progression to severe and critical illness. DesignWe conducted a randomized open label Phase II clinical trial from October -December 2020.MethodsPatients diagnosed with COVID-19 using RT-PCR were included in the study if they were 18 years and above and had a diagnosis of COVID-19 made in the last 3 days. Patients were randomized in blocks, to receive either HCQ 400mg twice a day for the first day followed by 200mg twice daily for the next 4 days plus standard of care (SOC) treatment or SOC treatment alone. SARS COV-2 viral load using nasal/orapharyngeal swabs was performed at baseline, day 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10. The primary outcome was median time from randomization to SARS COV-2 viral clearance by day 6.ResultsOf the 105 participants enrolled, 55 were assigned to the intervention group (HCQ plus SOC) and 50 to the control group (SOC only). Baseline characteristics were similar across treatment arms. Viral clearance did not differ by treatment arm, 20 and 19 participants respectively had SARS COV-2 viral load clearance by day 6 with no significant difference, median (IQR) number of days to viral load clearance between the two groups was 4(3-4) vs 4(2-4): p=0.457. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes (symptom resolution and adverse events) between the intervention group and the control group. There were no significant differences in specific adverse events such as elevated alkaline phosphatase, prolonged QTc interval on ECG, among patients in the intervention group as compared to the control group.ConclusionOur results show that HCQ 400mg twice a day for the first day followed by 200mg twice daily for the next 4 days was safe but not associated with reduction in viral clearance or symptom resolution. Trial registration: NCT04860284


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document