Predictors of Outcome, Complications, and Recanalization of the Solitaire Device

Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Badih Daou ◽  
Nohra Chalouhi ◽  
Robert M. Starke ◽  
Richard Dalyai ◽  
Kate Hentschel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Cerebral Infarction ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
Flow Restoration ◽  
The Mean

Abstract BACKGROUND: The use of mechanical thrombectomy in the management of acute ischemic stroke is becoming increasingly popular. OBJECTIVE: To identify notable factors that affect outcome, revascularization, and complications in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with the Solitaire Flow Restoration Revascularization device. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients treated with the Solitaire Flow Restoration Revascularization device (ev3/Covidien Vascular Therapies, Irvine, California) were retrospectively analyzed. Three endpoints were considered: revascularization (Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction), outcome (modified Rankin Scale score), and complications. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were conducted to determine significant predictors. RESULTS: The mean time from onset of symptoms to the start of intervention was 6.7 hours. The average procedure length was 58 minutes. The mean NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 16 on arrival and 8 at discharge. Of the patients, 6.7% had a symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, 16.8% had fatal outcomes within 3 months post-intervention, and 81.4% had a successful recanalization. Thrombus location in the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery was associated with successful recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b/3) (P = .003). Of the patients, 56.6% had a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months: 0–2). In patients younger than 80 years of age, 66.7% had favorable outcome. Increasing age (P = .01) and NIHSS score (P = .002) were significant predictors of a poor outcome. On multivariate analysis, NIHSS score on admission (P = .05) was a predictor of complications. On univariate analysis, increasing NIHSS score from admission to 24 hours after the procedure (P = .05) and then to discharge (P = .04) was a predictor of complications. Thrombus location in the posterior circulation (P = .04) and increasing NIHSS score (P = .04) predicted mortality. CONCLUSION: The Solitaire device is safe and effective in achieving successful recanalization after acute ischemic stroke. Important factors to consider include age, NIHSS score, and location.

Abstract 268: Is There a Weekend Effect on Telestroke Code Time Metrics?

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ganesh Asaithambi ◽  
Amy L Castle ◽  
Emily H Marino ◽  
Bridget M Ho ◽  
Sandra K Hanson
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Weekend Effect ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Code Process

Background: It has been suggested that there is a “weekend effect” resulting in higher mortality rates for stroke patients admitted on weekends. We examine this phenomenon for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients presenting to telestroke (TS) sites to determine its effect on stroke code process times and outcomes. Methods: From October 2015-June 2017, we reviewed consecutive AIS patients receiving IV alteplase within our TS network who then were transferred to our CSC. We compared patients presenting to TS sites on weekdays (Monday 0700 to Friday 1859) to patients presenting on weekends (Friday 1900 to Monday 0659). We analyzed door to code activation, code activation to TS evaluation, door to imaging, and door to needle times. Rates of favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2) and death at 90 days were compared. Results: We identified 89 (54 weekday, 35 weekend) patients (mean age 71.8±13.3 years, 47.2% women) during the study period. Median door to code activation (15 [5, 27] vs 8 [1, 17] mins, p=0.01) and door to needle (61 [49, 73] vs 47 [35, 59] mins, p=0.003) times were significantly longer for patients presenting on weekends compared to weekdays. There were no significant differences in median door to imaging (weekend 17 [7, 30] vs weekday 11 [6, 21], p=0.1) and code activation to TS evaluation (weekend 7 [6, 10] vs weekday 5 [4, 9], p=0.14) times. The rates of favorable outcome (weekend 50% vs weekday 66.7%, p=0.18) and death (weekend 8.3% vs weekday 4.8%, p=0.56) at 90 days were not significantly different. Conclusion: While there were no significant differences in outcomes, the “weekend effect” results in slower door to code activation and door to needle times. Efforts to improve methods in increasing efficiency of care on weekends should be considered.

scholarly journals Clinical profile of patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis (rtPA-alteplase)

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 164
Author(s):  
Shiva Prasad Jagini ◽  
Suresh I.
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Clinical Profile ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Centre Hospital

Background: Stroke patients are at highest risk death in the first few weeks after the event, and between 20-50% die within first month depending on type, severity, age, co-morbidities and effectiveness of treatment of complications. Objective of this study was to clinical profile of patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis (rtPA-alteplase).Methods: Prospective Observational study of 26 cases of acute ischemic stroke receiving IV thrombolysis using rtPA-alteplase at Kovai Medical Centre Hospital, Coimbatore over a period of 1 year 9 months.Results: 21 cases had NIHSS score of range 10 to 22. The mean NIHSS score at admission is 13.5. 15 subjects (57.7%) had achieved primary outcome in this study. MRS Score of 0 to 2 is considered as favorable outcome. In this study 20 subjects (76.92 %) had favorable outcome at the end of 3 months.Conclusions: Majority of the patients receiving rtPA-alteplase had favorable outcome.

scholarly journals Weekday Versus Weekend Presentation in the Acute Management of Ischemic Stroke Through Telemedicine

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-117
Author(s):  
Ganesh Asaithambi ◽  
Amy L. Castle ◽  
Megan E. Tipps ◽  
Bridget M. Ho ◽  
Emily H. Marino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Weekend Effect ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Acute Management ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Intravenous Alteplase

A “weekend effect” resulting in higher mortality rates for patients with stroke admitted on weekends has been reported. We examine this phenomenon for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) presenting to telestroke (TS) sites to determine its effect on stroke alert process times and outcomes. From October 2015 to June 2017, we reviewed patients with AIS receiving intravenous alteplase within our TS network. We compared patients presenting to TS sites on weekdays (Monday 07:00 to Friday 18:59) to those presenting on weekends (Friday 19:00 to Monday 06:59). We analyzed door-to-alert activation, alert activation-to-TS evaluation, door-to-imaging, and door-to-needle times. Rates of favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2) and death at 90 days were compared. We identified 89 (54 weekday and 35 weekend) patients (mean age: 71.8 ± 13.3 years, 47.2% women) during the study period. Median door-to-alert activation ( P = .01) and door-to-needle ( P = .004) times were significantly longer for patients presenting on weekends compared to weekdays. There were no significant differences in median door-to-imaging ( P = .1) and alert activation-to-TS evaluation ( P = .07) times. Rates of favorable outcome ( P = .19) and death ( P = .56) at 90 days did not differ. While there were no significant differences in outcomes, patients presenting on weekends had longer door-to-alert activation and door-to-needle times. Efforts to improve methods in efficiency of care on weekends should be considered.

Comparison of Sub-Types and Severity of Ischemic Stroke among Both Genders

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1340-1344
Author(s):  
Q. Yusaf ◽  
A. Qayyum ◽  
E. U. Haq, Javaria ◽  
A. Yasir ◽  
H. A. Qayyum
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
P Value ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Female Case ◽  
The Mean

Background: It has been noted that there is an increased prevalence and serious clinical implications of stroke in women. However, local studies focused on stroke among female gender are still scarce. Aim: To find frequency of female patients with ischemic stroke and to compare the sub-types of ischemic stroke, mean NIHSS score and mean MRS scores among both genders. Methodology: This descriptive case series was conducted in indoor and outdoor department of Neurology at Mayo Hospital, Lahore for six months [Feb 6, 2018 till August 6, 2018]. After taking demographics and clinical characteristics of patients, the severity of stroke was taken using National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission in hospital. The functional outcome was measured using Modified Rankin Scale (MRS). Subtype of acute ischemic stroke was assigned using Oxfordshire classification for acute ischemic stroke. All data was taken on a structured proforma and was entered and analyzed using SPSS version 21. Results: The mean age of cases was 53.58 ± 9.42 years with 73(60.83%) male and 47(39.17%) female cases. Among TACS, there were 15(50%) female cases whereas 9(34.6%) female case were found in PACS and 10(33.3%) female cases were found in LACS. The frequency of gender in all subtypes was statistically same in both groups, p-value > 0.05. The mean modified Rankin scale in male and female cases was 2.93 ± 1.58 and 4.30 ±1.50 respectively with significantly higher mean MMR score in females than male cases, p-value < 0.05. Conclusion: This study concludes that females make up a considerable percentage of patients with ischemic stroke. Though, no statistically significant difference could be found in terms of subtypes of ischemic stroke, the mean NIHSS score and mean MRS were statistically higher among females compared to male cases. Keywords: Stroke, subtypes, severity, ischemia, gender difference, NIHSS, MRS

SAFETY, EFFECTIVENESS, AND PRACTICALITY OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY WITHIN THE FIRST 3 HOURS OF ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE ONSET

Neurosurgery ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 860-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlon S. Mathews ◽  
Jitendra Sharma ◽  
Kenneth V. Snyder ◽  
Sabareesh K. Natarajan ◽  
Adnan H. Siddiqui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Retrieval System ◽  
Stroke Onset ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Ischemic Events

Abstract OBJECTIVE This study assesses the safety, effectiveness, and practicality of endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke within the first 3 hours of symptom onset. METHODS A retrospective chart review (January 2000–July 2008) was performed of 94 consecutive patients who had endovascular therapy within 3 hours after acute ischemic stroke onset. Endovascular therapy was administered in patients in whom intravenous (IV) thrombolysis failed or was contraindicated. Outcome measures analyzed were recanalization rate, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) rate, procedural complications, modified Rankin Scale score, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and mortality rate. RESULTS The study included 41 male and 53 female patients with a mean age of 68 years (age range, 13–98 years). The mean NIHSS score at the time of admission was 14.7. Eight-three patients had anterior circulation ischemic events, and 11 had posterior circulation ischemic events. The cause was determined to be arterioembolic in 21 patients (22%), cardioembolic in 45 (48%), arterial dissection in 2, left-to-right cardiac shunt in 1, and unknown in 25 (27%). Endovascular interventions included intra-arterial (IA) pharmacological thrombolysis (n = 44), mechanical thrombolysis (Merci Retrieval System, intracranial or extracranial stent, microwire) (n = 79), and intracranial or extracranial angioplasty (n = 32) in various combinations. The mean time from stroke onset to angiogram was 72 minutes. Thirteen patients received a half dose (n = 8) or full dose (n = 5) of IV thrombolysis (tissue plasminogen activator [tPA]) in conjunction with endovascular therapy. Twenty-two patients received IA or IV adjunctive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (eptifibatide). Partial-to-complete recanalization (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction scale score of 2 or 3) was achieved in 62 of 89 of patients (70%) presenting with significant occlusion (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction scale score of 0 or 1). Postprocedure symptomatic ICH occurred in 5 patients (5.3%), which was purely subarachnoid hemorrhage in 3 patients. Of these, 2 received IA tPA in conjunction with Merci Retrieval System passes; the others each received IA tPA, mechanical thrombectomy (guidewire), or extracranial angioplasty. The total mortality rate including procedural mortality, progression of disease, and other comorbidities was 26.6%. Sixteen patients (17%) were discharged home, 49 (52%) to rehabilitation, and 4 (4%) to long-term care facilities. Overall, 36.7% had a modified Rankin Scale score of 2 or less at discharge. The mean NIHSS score at discharge was 6.5, representing an overall 8-point improvement on the NIHSS. CONCLUSION Endovascular therapy within the first 3 hours of stroke symptom onset in patients in whom IV tPA therapy is contraindicated or fails is safe, effective, and practical. The risk of symptomatic ICH is low and should be viewed relative to the poor prognosis in this group of patients.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Neuroprotective Drugs in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Is It Helpful?

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 576-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anish Mehta ◽  
Rohan Mahale ◽  
Kiran Buddaraju ◽  
Mahendra Javali ◽  
Purushottam Acharya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Neuroprotective Agents ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Neuroprotective Drugs ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Out of several neuroprotective drugs (NPDs) studied in animals and humans, four NPDs (citicoline, edaravone, cerebrolysin, and minocycline) have been found to have beneficial effects in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Objective The purpose is to evaluate the efficacy of citicoline, edaravone, minocycline, and cerebrolysin compared with placebo in patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory AIS. Materials and Methods This was a prospective, single center, single-blinded, and hospital-based study. One hundred patients with MCA territory AIS with 20 patients in each group including control group were included. Barthel index (BI), National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and modified Rankin Scale score were recorded at admission, at day 11 and after 90 days. Results The mean NIHSS score was significantly lesser at day 11 and after 90 days in citicoline, edaravone, and cerebrolysin group in comparison with placebo. Similarly, the mean BI score was significantly higher at day 11 and after 90 days in citicoline, edaravone, and cerebrolysin group in comparison with placebo. In minocycline group, there was no significant change in the NIHSS score and BI score at day 11 and after 90 days. Conclusion There was significant improvement in the functional outcome of patients with AIS involving MCA territory at 90 days receiving citicoline, edaravone, and cerebrolysin. However, minocycline did not offer the same efficacy as compared with other neuroprotective agents.

scholarly journals Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients Younger than 18 Years

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sibasankar Dalai ◽  
Uday Limaye ◽  
Satyarao Kolli ◽  
Mohan V. Sumedha Maturu ◽  
Randhi Venkata Narayana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
Arterial Recanalization ◽  
The Mean

AbstractRapid and effective revascularization is very important in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Endovascular treatment is a promising modality in the management of AIS in young patients. We evaluated the clinical and imaging records in 14 patients younger than 18 years presenting within 6 hours of AIS. They received endovascular therapy (ET) either by mechanical thrombectomy, thromboaspiration, or both (Solumbra) between July 2017 and June 2021 in our institute. The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was calculated on admission and before the discharge of all patients. The 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score on disability-free outcome was also evaluated. The mean preprocedure NIHSS score was 10.78 ± 2.11 that improved to 4.5 ± 1.88 after the procedure. Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) grade 2b and 3 blood flow could be established in 12 (85.72%) patients. One patient had TICI 2a flow and one patient had recurrent occlusion despite repeated recanalization (TICI grade 0). The disability-free outcome, mRS score at 90 days was 0 to 1 in 12 (85.72%) patients, mRS score 2 in one (7.14%) patient, and mRS score 3 in one patient (7.14%). We did not have any major complication related to the procedure. ET provides high rates of arterial recanalization and favorable disability-free outcomes in young patients with AIS.

Abstract 10: Predictors of Poor Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients after Successful Recanalization

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy K Starosciak ◽  
Italo Linfante ◽  
Gail Walker ◽  
Osama O Zaidat ◽  
Alicia C Castonguay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Cerebral Infarction ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Predictive Power ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Poor Outcome

Background: Recanalization of the occluded artery is a powerful predictor of good outcome in acute ischemic stroke secondary to large artery occlusions. Mechanical thrombectomy with stent-trievers results in higher recanalization rates and better outcomes compared to previous devices. However, despite successful recanalization rates (Treatment in Cerebral Infarction, TICI, score ≥ 2b) between 70 and 90%, good clinical outcomes assessed by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 2 is present in 40-50% of patients . We aimed to evaluate predictors of poor outcomes (mRS > 2) despite successful recanalization (TICI ≥ 2b) in the acute stroke patients treated with the Solitaire device of the North American Solitaire Stent Retriever Acute Stroke (NASA) registry. Methods: The NASA registry is a multicenter, non-sponsored, physician-conducted, post-marketing registry on the use of SOLITAIRE FR device in 354 acute, large vessel, ischemic stroke patients. Logistic regression was used to evaluate patient characteristics and treatment parameters for association with 90-day mRS score of 0-2 (good outcome) versus 3-6 (poor outcome) within patients who were recanalized successfully (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction or TICI score 2b-3). Univariate tests were followed by development of a multivariable model based on stepwise selection with entry and retention criteria of p < 0.05 from the set of factors with at least marginal significance (p ≤ 0.10) on univariate analysis. The c-statistic was calculated as a measure of predictive power. Results: Out of 354 patients, 256 (72.3%) were successfully recanalized (TICI ≥ 2b). Based on 90-day mRS score for 234 of these patients, there were 116 (49.6%) with mRS > 2. Univariate analysis identified increased risk of mRS > 2 for each of the following: age ≥ 80 years (upper quartile of data), occlusion site other than M1/M2, NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥ 18 (median), history of diabetes mellitus (DM), TICI = 2b, use of rescue therapy, not using a balloon-guided catheter (BGC) or intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV t-PA), and time to recanalization > 30 minutes (all p ≤ 0.05). Three or more passes was marginally significant (p=0.097). In multivariable analysis, age ≥ 80 years, site other than M1/M2, initial NIHSS ≥18, DM, absence of IV t-PA, use of rescue therapy and three or more passes were significant independent predictors of poor 90-day outcome in a model with good predictive power (c-index = 0.80). Conclusions: Age, occlusion site, high NIHSS, diabetes, not receiving IV t-PA, use of rescue therapy and three or more passes, were associated with poor 90-day outcome despite successful recanalization.

Acute intracranial stenting with mechanical thrombectomy is safe and efficacious in patients diagnosed with underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease

2021 ◽  
pp. 159101992110394
Author(s):  
Ameer E Hassan ◽  
Victor M Ringheanu ◽  
Laurie Preston ◽  
Wondwossen G Tekle ◽  
Adnan I Qureshi
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Cerebral Infarction ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Intracranial Stenting ◽  
Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

Objective To investigate whether significant differences exist in recanalization rates and primary outcomes between patients who undergo mechanical thrombectomy alone versus those who undergo mechanical thrombectomy with acute intracranial stenting. Methods Through the utilization of a prospectively collected endovascular database at a comprehensive stroke center between 2012 and 2020, variables such as demographics, co-morbid conditions, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, mortality rate at discharge, and good/poor outcomes in regard to modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score and modified Rankin Scale were examined. The outcomes between patients receiving acute intracranial stenting + mechanical thrombectomy and patients that underwent mechanical thrombectomy alone were compared. Results There were a total of 420 acute ischemic stroke patients who met criteria for the study (average age 70.6 ± 13.01 years; 46.9% were women). Analysis of 46 patients from the acute stenting + mechanical thrombectomy group (average age 70.34 ± 13.75 years; 37.0% were women), and 374 patients from the mechanical thrombectomy alone group (average age 70.64 ± 12.92 years; 48.1% were women). Four patients (8.7%) in the acute stenting + mechanical thrombectomy group experienced intracerebral hemorrhage versus 45 patients (12.0%) in the mechanical thrombectomy alone group ( p = 0.506); no significant increases were noted in the median length of stay (7 vs 8 days; p = 0.208), rates of modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2B-3 recanalization ( p = 0.758), or good modified Rankin Scale scores ( p = 0.806). Conclusion Acute intracranial stenting in addition to mechanical thrombectomy was not associated with an increase in overall length of stay, intracerebral hemorrhage rates, or any change in discharge modified Rankin Scale. Further research is required to determine whether mechanical thrombectomy and acute intracranial stenting in acute ischemic stroke patients is unsafe.

scholarly journals Recanalization and Angiographic Reperfusion Are Both Associated with a Favorable Clinical Outcome in the IMS III Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 118-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie L. Schmitz ◽  
Sharon D. Yeatts ◽  
Thomas A. Tomsick ◽  
David S. Liebeskind ◽  
Achala Vagal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Arterial Tree ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Optimal Thresholds ◽  
Favorable Clinical Outcome

Background: Prompt revascularization is the main goal of acute ischemic stroke treatment. We examined which revascularization scale - reperfusion (modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarctions, mTICI) or recanalization (Arterial Occlusive Lesion, AOL) - better predicted the clinical outcome in ischemic stroke participants treated with endovascular therapy (EVT). Additionally, we determined the optimal thresholds for the predictive accuracy of each scale. Methods: We included participants from the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III trial with complete occlusion in the internal carotid artery terminus or proximal middle cerebral artery (M1 or M2) who completed EVT within 7 h of symptom onset. The abilities of the AOL and mTICI scales to predict a favorable outcome (defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 3 months) were compared by receiver operating characteristic analyses. The maximal sensitivity and specificity for each revascularization scale were established. Results: Among 240 participants who met the study inclusion criteria, 79 (33%) achieved a favorable outcome. Higher scores of mTICI and AOL increased the likelihood of a favorable outcome (2.7% with mTICI 0 vs. 83.3% with mTICI 3, and 3.0% with AOL 0 vs. 43% with AOL 3). The accuracy of mTICI reperfusion and AOL recanalization for a favorable outcome prediction was similar, with optimal thresholds of mTICI 2b/3 and AOL 3, respectively. Conclusion: Reperfusion (mTICI) and recanalization (AOL) predicted a favorable clinical outcome with comparable accuracy in ischemic stroke participants treated with EVT. Optimal revascularization goals to maximize clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) consisted of complete recanalization (AOL 3) and reperfusion of at least 50% of the arterial tree of the symptomatic artery (mTICI 2b/3) in the IMS III trial setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document